Case 1:12-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40 Filed 03/14/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID: 497 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VINCINAGE OF CAMDEN



Similar documents
Case 5:10-cv OLG Document 150 Filed 11/12/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv Document 37 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 43 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 254

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 29 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: <pageid>

Case 2:08-cv LDD Document 17 Filed 02/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. CASE NO. 3:01-cv-1275-J-25 HTS

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

Ecug!2<25.ex TDY!!!Fqewogpv!9!!!Hkngf! !!!Rcig!2!qh!6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:03-cr JES Document 60 Filed 02/19/08 Page 1 of 7 PageID 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LUCINDA G. MILLER; ELAINE KING-MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees

Case: 1:07-cv Document #: 44 Filed: 03/12/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:<pageid>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

The State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS

Case 1:03-cv HHK Document Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:07-cv GMS Document 18 Filed 04/07/2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Court of Appeal No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES EX REL. JEFFREY E. MAIN Plaintiff/Appellant

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.

Case: 1:12-cv SJD-KLL Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/28/12 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 108

Case 1:12-cv BAH Document 34 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ORAL ARGUMENT IN CASE NO SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 21, Case Nos and

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 3:06-cv P Document 13 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 5 PageID 59

Case 1:08-cv JEI-KMW Document 31 Filed 06/05/2009 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:11-cv WHW -MCA Document 17 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 199 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

How To Get The Lesser Prairie Chicken To Live Outside Of The Coon Line

How To Sue The State Of Pennsylvania For Disability Discrimination

Case RTL Doc 176 Filed 01/06/12 Entered 01/06/12 11:51:48 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

jurisdiction is DENIED and plaintiff s motion for leave to amend is DENIED. BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Case l:ll-cv yk Document 15 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv Document 490 Filed in TXSD on 08/22/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 48 Filed: 03/12/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:<pageid>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 3:05-cv SRC-JJH Document 19-1 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Tucker, J. October, Presently before this Court are Plaintiff s Motion to Remand to State Court and

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 49 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:<pageid>

Case 6:10-cv DNH-ATB Document 76-1 Filed 08/22/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:11-cv D Document 11 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID 62

Case 1:14-cv JEB Document 17 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS

Case: 2:04-cv JLG-NMK Doc #: 33 Filed: 06/13/05 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: <pageid>

Case 8:13-cv VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 11-AA Petition for Review of a Decision of the Compensation Review Board (CRB )

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 63 Filed 05/08/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY Office of Administrative Law Judges WASHINGTON, D.C

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 45 Filed: 03/22/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:299

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Case 8:11-cv RWT Document 18 Filed 09/15/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 5:11-cv TBR Document 18 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1349

CASE 0:11-cv MJD-FLN Document 96 Filed 07/11/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:05-cv JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG)

Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint

Case 1:12-cv JSR Document 77 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 8

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CHRISTIAN M. RANDOLPH,

Case: 5:10-cv DAP Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/14/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 358 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M. STENGEL, J. November, 2005

Case 5:09-cv TJC-JRK Document 30 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Ocala Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE

Case 2:10-cv GMN-LRL Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NO DOROTHY AVICOLLI, Appellant

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV /27/2011 HONORABLE DEAN M. FINK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:07cv257

Case 3:13-cv L Document 22 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 220

ORIGINAL. Beatrice Herrera None Present CLERK. U.S.DISTRICT COURT

Case 8:11-ap KRM Doc 14 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RJS Document 16 Filed 08/12/13 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 4:09-cv Document 37 Filed in TXSD on 08/16/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv SRD-JCW Document 61 Filed 08/20/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 1:13-cv GBL-TRJ Document 54 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 318

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. RALPH MONTANO and ELSIE MONTANO, Plaintiffs, v. No S

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 5:14-cv BO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:08-cv DRH-WDW Document 36-1 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 291

Case 2:05-cv JES-SPC Document 14 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID 59

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER

Case 2:14-cv DGC Document 38 Filed 08/25/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No (DSD/FLN) This matter is before the court upon the objection by

Transcription:

Case 112-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40 Filed 03/14/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 497 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VINCINAGE OF CAMDEN Teresita Carey, by and through her guardian, Jim Carey, et. al., Plaintiffs, HON. RENEE MARIE BUMB, U.S.D.J. v. Civil Action No. 112-cv-02522 Christopher Christie, Governor of the State of New Jersey, et. al. Defendants. NOTICE OF INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The United States files this Notice of Interest, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 517, 1 to alert this Court that it has an interest in this matter. Plaintiffs are seven women with intellectual disabilities who currently reside in Vineland Developmental Center ( Vineland ), a large state-operated institution. Their Complaint alleges that, through the actions of Defendants, Plaintiffs may be forced to move from Vineland at some time in the future, and that this move would violate their rights under title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12131 et seq. ( ADA ), Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794, the Medicaid Act, 42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq., and the United States Constitution. Amended Compl. 92-127. 1 Under 28 U.S.C. 517, [t]he Solicitor General, or any officer of the Department of Justice, may be sent by the Attorney General to any State or district in the United States to attend to the interests of the United States in a suit pending in a court of the United States, or in a court of a State, or to attend to any other interest of the United States.

Case 112-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40 Filed 03/14/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 498 The Department of Justice has authority to enforce title II of the ADA, and to issue regulations implementing the statute. The Department frequently provides guidance in federal courts regarding the meaning of the ADA and its regulations, and its views have been accorded respect. Olmstead v. L.C., 527 U.S. 581, 597-598 (1999) ( Because the Department is the agency directed by Congress to issue regulations implementing Title II, its views warrant respect. ) (citation omitted); Pashby v. Delia, 2013 WL 791829 *10 (4th Cir. 2013) ( Because Congress instructed the DOJ to issue regulations regarding Title II, we are especially swayed by the DOJ's determination ); M.R. v. Dreyfus, 663 F.3d 1100, 1117 (9th Cir. 2011), opinion amended and superseded on other grounds upon denial of rehearing, 697 F.3d 706, 735 (9th Cir. 2012) (opinions deferring to DOJ s views regarding title II and its regulations, stating that [a]n agency s interpretation of its own regulation is controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. ) (citations omitted). Plaintiffs allegations, on their face, are not ripe for adjudication. 2 However, should the Court determine it is necessary to reach the merits of Plaintiffs claims, the United States respectfully requests an opportunity to submit a Statement of Interest to vindicate its interest in the proper interpretation of federal law, and in particular, title II of the ADA and its regulations. The United States is not a party to the case and just learned of the scheduled oral argument date. The United States would be prepared to submit a Statement of Interest on the merits at a date set 2 A claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all. Gov t Emples. Ret. Sys. v. Turnbull, 134 Fed. Appx. 498, 500 (3d Cir. 2005) (quoting Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998)); Porter-Bey v. Bledsoe, 456 Fed. Appx. 109, 110-111 (3d Cir. 2012) (same); Disabled in Action v. SEPTA, 539 F.3d 199, 217 (3d Cir. Pa. 2008) (citing Texas, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (rejecting an argument contingent on anticipated events that may not occur and that if adopted, would encourage unripe ADA claims). See also Hoxha v. Levi, 465 F.3d 554, 565 (3d Cir. Pa. 2006) (citing Texas, 523 U.S. at 300) (rejecting a claim as unripe when an agency has not yet acted upon a petitioners claim). Defendants have shown that there are no plans to close Vineland or to move Plaintiffs from Vineland over their objections. Deft. Br. at 1, 8-9 (Doc. #33-1).

Case 112-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40 Filed 03/14/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 499 by this Court, should the Court not dismiss the claims as not ripe. FOR THE UNITED STATES Respectfully submitted, PAUL J. FISHMAN United States Attorney District of New Jersey THOMAS E. PEREZ Assistant Attorney General EVE HILL Senior Counselor to the Assistant Attorney General ALISON N. BARKOFF Special Counsel for Olmstead Enforcement SUSAN MENAHEM Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney s Office JONATHAN SMITH 970 Broad Street Chief Newark, NJ 07102 Telephone (973) 645-2843 Facsimile (973) 297-2010 MARY R. BOHAN Email susan.menahem@usdoj.gov Deputy Chief Telephone (202) 616-6255 /s Christopher N. Cheng CHRISTOPHER N. CHENG Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone (202) 514-8892 Fax (202) 514-4883 Christopher.cheng@usdoj.gov Dated March 14, 2013

Case 112-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40-1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 500 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VINCINAGE OF CAMDEN Teresita Carey, by and through her guardian, Jim Carey, et. al., Plaintiffs, HON. RENEE MARIE BUMB, U.S.D.J. v. Civil Action No. 112-cv-02522 Christopher Christie, Governor of the State of New Jersey, et. al. Defendants. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 14, 2013, I electronically filed the United States' Notice of Interest with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the following Attorneys for Plaintiffs Teresita Carey et al Thomas A. Archer NJ Attorney I.D. 054321994 3401 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110-0950 (717) 232-5000 Fax (717) 236-1816 taarcher@mette.com Thomas B. York PA Attorney I.D. No. 32522 3511 North Front Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 (717) 236-9675

Case 112-cv-02522-RMB-AMD Document 40-1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 501 Fax (717) 236-6919 tyork@yorklegalgroup.com Attorney for Defendants Christopher Christie, Governor of New Jersey, et al Gerard Hughes, Esquire Office of the New Jersey Attorney General Division of Law 26 Market Street P.O. Box 112 Trenton, NJ 08625-0112 Respectfully submitted, s/christopher N. Cheng CHRISTOPHER N. CHENG Attorney U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington D.C. 20530 Phone (202) 514-8892 Fax (202) 514-6273 E-mail christopher.cheng@usdoj.gov PA Bar No. 69066