2c: Managing Classroom Procedures. The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson



Similar documents
LOUISIANA TEACHER. Performance Evaluation Rubric

Domains 2 and 3 Critical Attributes and Possible Examples

The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation

SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Enhancing Professional Practice: Overview of the Framework for Teaching. 1 of 25

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION REPORT. Levels of Performance

Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

A Framework for Professional Practice

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators. DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

Educator Effectiveness Administrative Manual Part 1

Marzano Center Non-Classroom Instructional Support Member Evaluation Form

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

SASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date

Effective teaching and learning. The Critical Role of Classroom Management. What is a poorly managed classroom like?

Association of Indiana School Library Educators School Librarian Evaluation Rubric

Professional Online Educator: Assessing Knowledge and Skills in the Online Learning Environment 12 weeks

Colchester School District Teacher Evaluation Model. Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice

Classroom Management

Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Improving Classroom Management

Teacher S Web Site Development courses

Educator Effectiveness Administrative Manual

Professional Development Electronic Plan for Teachers

EDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 CERTIFIED EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PLAN

ARCHDIOCESE OF LOUISVILLE PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN FOR TEACHERS

Professional Online Educator: Online Course Design Practicum 12 weeks

Special Education Teacher

TEACHNJ ACT. New Evaluation Implementation School Year Required by State of NJ

n Starter n The Paper Flow n What? When? n Create a System n Conclusion n Questions for Assessment

School Nurse Evaluation Rubric

Early Childhood Education: Introduction to Early Childhood Education

Early Childhood Education: Health, Safety, and Nutrition

The performance assessment shall measure the extent to which the teacher s planning:

Master of Arts Program in Teaching English as a Foreign Language

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

WEST VIRGINIA VIRTUAL SCHOOL (WVVS) ONLINE TEACHER EVALUATION. (Form modified from:) West Virginia Board of Education Policy 5310 TEACHER EVALUATION

NYSED/NYCDOE JOINT INTERVENTION TEAM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

University of North Texas at Dallas Summer I 2015 SYLLABUS STEM Literacy Across the Disciplines/3Hrs

Professional Online Educator: Instructional Design for Online Learning Environments 12 weeks

Educational Leadership: Human Resource Administration

School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Such alternatives to the above qualifications as the board may find appropriate and acceptable.

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

North Carolina. Teacher Working Conditions Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Commission

Pre-service Performance Assessment Professional Standards for Teachers: See 603 CMR 7.08

Participant Guidebook

RATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL. Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous

PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.

Early Childhood Education: Curriculum in Early Childhood

The information and application for completing the Coaching and Mentoring models application is available to you from several sources:

Classroom Management Training. Final Report of the

Rodel Exemplary Teacher Initiative

Effectiveness of Direct Strategy Instruction through SIOP

PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION

The Danielson Group Behavior Specialists

Completed Formal Classroom Observation Form

Tulsa Public Schools Teacher Observation and Evaluation System: Its Research Base and Validation Studies

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 2 Course Index

1-to-1 Classroom Routines and Instructional Routines

Library Media Specialist Rubric

Developing (3.0 to 3.4 points) (B, B+) 1a.2) Uses language somewhat appropriate to developmental & skill level. developmental & skill level

DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS

Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument

School Law for Teachers Understanding Rights and Responsibilities Online Participant Syllabus

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

Tips on Building Classroom Procedures and Routines: How to have a well-managed classroom. Teacher Resources

Marion County Instruction Evaluation System

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION HANDBOOK FOR TEACHERS

Studying Skillful Teaching

CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Office of Human Resources Evaluation: Observation of Instruction Form Online Class

Classroom Management Plan

Submitted for Review and Approval Florida Department of Education 5/1/2012

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

Technology Changes in the Classroom: In search of effective, flexible solutions. T. V. Joe Layng, Ph.D. Director of Learning Sciences, Mimio

Wyoming City Schools Master Teacher Committee Bylaws

SLO Training 2015 Secondary Evaluation

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

19K660. Brooklyn, NY Jocelyn Badette

AR TESS SCHOOL COUNSELOR RUBRIC

Elementary Education. Field Experience Manual

RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT COACHING AND PERFORMANCE GEORGIA PERIMETER COLLEGE

Greenville City Schools. Teacher Evaluation Tool

Educational Leadership Organizational Behavior 12 weeks

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

Master s Degree Portfolio Project

Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

Fridley Alternative Compensation Plan Executive Summary

Department of Secondary Education Kutztown University of Pennsylvania. Master s Degree Portfolio Project

Transcription:

2c: Managing Classroom Procedures The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 1

} Understand the elements of 2c } Distinguish the difference in levels of performance } Review examples of 2c behavior } Identify individual levels of performance on 2c } Incorporate strategies to improve individual levels of performance in 2c 2

} A smoothly functioning classroom is a prerequisite to good instruction and high levels of student engagement. } Teachers establish and monitor routines and procedures for smooth operation of the classroom and the efficient use of time. 3

} Non-instructional tasks are completed effectively. } Management of transitions between activities and materials and supplies is done to maintain momentum and maximize instructional time. 4

} The establishment of efficient routines, and teaching students to employ them, may be inferred from the sense that the class runs itself. } A hallmark of a well-managed classroom is students working productively in instructional groups even when not under direct supervision of the teacher. } At the highest level, students themselves contribute to the use of these routines. 5

Management of Instructional Groups Much classroom work occurs in small groups Small groups enable students to work with their classmates. Small groups can discuss possible approaches to a problem. Small groups help students benefit from one another s thinking. Students cannot be expected to automatically know how to work productively in small groups. Skills for working in groups must be taught. Students work independently in groups with little supervision from the teacher in a well-run classroom. This component centers on the procedures students have been taught for working in groups; however, 3c focuses on student engagement in groups. 6

Management of Transitions Many lessons engage students in different types of activities-large group, small group, independent work. Transitions between these different activities and grouping patterns should proceed easily and smoothly. Students move from one activity to another with little instructional time lost. Students know the process and execute it seamlessly. 7

Management of Materials and Supplies A clear indication of a teacher s skill lies in the procedures for distribution and collection of materials. Experienced teachers have all necessary materials at hand and have taught students to implement the routines with little disruption to the flow of instruction. 8

Performance of Non-Instructional Duties Accomplished teachers are masters of multitasking. They take attendance, for example, while students are beginning a task written on the board. Where appropriate, students themselves contribute to the design and execution of routine matters, such as the lunch count or the return of permission slips for activities. Little instructional time is lost in such matters. 9

} One member of each small group collects materials for the table. } This observation is an indication that the teacher has established a procedure for how materials and supplies are managed in the classroom and that students follow the established procedure. 10

} Roll-taking consumes much time at the beginning of the lesson and students are not working on anything. } This observation demonstrates that too much class time is dedicated to non-instructional duties. Having too much instructional time lost to non-instructional duties is an indication of a lower level of performance for Managing Classroom Procedures. 11

} In small-group work, students have established roles; they listen to one another, summarize different views, etc. } This observation serves as evidence that the teacher has established effective practices for managing instructional groups. These observations indicate a higher level of performance. 12

Look and plan for these indicators during a lesson. } Smooth functioning of all routines } Little or no loss of instructional time } Students play an important role in carrying out the routines } Students know what to do, where to move 13

Levels of Performance Answers } A. Distinguished (Level 4) } B. Proficient (Level 3) } C. Unsatisfactory (Level 1) } D. Basic (Level 2) 14

Level 3 Proficient: Critical Attributes } Students are productively engaged during small group work. } Transitions between large and small group activities are smooth. } Routines for collecting and distributing materials and supplies work effectively. } Classroom routines work smoothly. 15

Level 2 Basic: Critical Attributes } Procedures for transitions and for distribution/collection of materials seem to have been established, but their operation is rough. } Classroom routines function unevenly. } Small groups are only partially engaged while not working directly with the teacher. 16

Level 1 Unsatisfactory: Critical Attributes } Students not working with the teacher are not productively engaged or are disruptive to the class. } There are no established procedures for distributing or collecting materials. } Procedures for other activities are confused or chaotic. 17

Level 4 Distinguished: Critical Attributes In addition to characteristics of Level 3 performance, Students themselves ensure that transitions and other routines are accomplished smoothly. Students take initiative in distributing and collecting materials efficiently. Students take the initiative with their classmates to ensure that their time is used productively. 18

To what extent do you: teach your students how to transition from one activity to another? have them practice the routines? give them feedback? What procedures can you teach your students so they assume responsibility for materials and supplies? 19