TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES



Similar documents
EMPLOYEES GUIDE TO APPEALING A WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIM DENIAL

28 Texas Administrative Code

WORKERS COMPENSATION FUNDAMENTALS. Know How to Navigate Your Claim

How To File A Family Law Case In California

CIVIL TRIAL RULES. of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS. Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS. Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PROCEDURAL RULES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION HEARINGS

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA PROTOCOL FOR THE USE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEO CONFERENCING CIVIL

2013 Amendments to Local Rules and Invitation to Comment

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GOVERNING EXPERT DISCOVERY

RULE 10 FUNDS HELD BY THE CLERK

(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE SAM SPARKS

FACT SHEET FOR JUDGE ORLANDO GARCIA

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

Title 40 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Part I. Workers' Compensation Administration Subpart 2. Hearing Rules. Chapter 55. General Provisions

NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Copyright 2013 by the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law

CHAPTER 13 RULES FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC SUBSTANCE ABUSERS

Article 1. Definitions. (b) Administrative director means the administrative director of the Division of Workers Compensation or his or her designee.

The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer

State of Delaware Industrial Accident Board

LEGISLATIVE BILL 951

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

RULE 7 PROBATE CASES. RULE 7.10 Probate Courts/Session

RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS TAXATION OF COURT COSTS IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice.

RULES OF THE TAX APPEAL COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

ORDER I. COURT ADMINISTRATION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION

PART 3 CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES (Revised) APROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN MAY 2002

PROCEDURE FOR ADJUSTING GRIEVANCES FOR SUPPORT STAFF

Transport Accident Act No Fault Dispute Resolution Protocols 1 March 2005 (amended as from August 2008)

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

COMMON INTEREST AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTICIPATING AGENCIES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bylaws of the Lawyer-Client Fee Dispute Resolution Committee of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association. Enacted November 18, 2015

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

DWC FORM-152 (Application for Attorney's Fees)

Last amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011.

Current Workers Compensation Law Compared to the 2013 Workers Compensation Reform Act

COMBUSTION ENGINEERING 524(g) ASBESTOS PI TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES

Terms and Conditions for Tax Services

Parsonage Vandenack Williams LLC Attorneys at Law

SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY PROBATE DIVISION

SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

PRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES

INDEPENDENT CITIES RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY WORKERS COMPENSATION LITIGATION MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 6: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE MICHIGAN COURT RULES OF 1985

HOME WARRANTY COMPANY ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS March 15, 2016 Copyright by CDRS 2006 all rights reserved

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY TAX OVERSIGHT PROGRAM CREATING RULE CHAPTER 12D-9

IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL MEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

HOME WARRANTY COMPANY ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS JANUARY 1, 2007 Copyright by CDRS 2006 all rights reserved

[Additions to the text are indicated in underlining and deleted text is shown by strikeover.]

S.B th General Assembly (As Introduced)

AN ACT. To amend chapter 383, RSMo, by adding thereto thirteen new sections relating to the Missouri health care arbitration act.

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND

JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes

WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION STANDARDS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box th Street Boulder, CO

-Send this copy back to Southern Credit Repair- Consumer Credit File Rights Under State and Federal Law

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016

Discovery Depositions 1 Part I: Practical Considerations in Planning and Preparing to Take a Discovery Deposition

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

118 MISSISSIPPI HEALTHCARE DATA REGISTRY SYSTEM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

Rule 1. Procedures Before the Board; Compensation Payments; Reports; Second Injury Fund

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION

LOCAL RULES of THE CIVIL COURTS OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS -- including revisions approved by the Texas Supreme Court 12/7/05

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

CHAPTER 60Q-6 FLORIDA RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION ADJUDICATIONS

Exhibit A PROCEDURES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE CONASAUGA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF GEORGIA FOR ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

STUDENT LOAN DEFAULT MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT Between. and HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Local Court Rules for the 27 th Judicial District

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT RULES - for - THE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION of THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Guilford County, North Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION

Hon. Maria S. Vazquez-Doles, J.S.C. Orange County Supreme Court 285 Main Street Goshen, NY Part Rules (Effective September 29, 2014)

ORDER GRANTING TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY / HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE S MOTION TO INTERVENE

FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR DIVORCE CASES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Rule 6 Adopted at a joint meeting of the District and County Court at Law Judges of Webb County on December 2, 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO

DIVORCE ANSWER PACKET

Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010)

HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i

New Jersey No-Fault PIP Arbitration Rules (2013)

Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court

Investment Advisory Services Agreement Participant Directed Accounts

CHAPTER 11 APPEALS AND DISPUTES

Discussion. Discussion

APPEAL NO FILED JUNE 4, 1997

Transcription:

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES The following practices and procedures are effective for all benefit review conferences (BRCs). The purpose is to facilitate the orderly conduct of BRCs statewide through uniform practices and procedures. Some BRCs may be conducted by telephone or videoconference. A separate section is included to set out the different procedures for those BRCs. I. PRE-BRC MATTERS CANCELING OR RESCHEDULING BRCs Under Rule 141.2, the Division may cancel or reschedule a BRC (1) on its own motion; (2) at the request of the party who requested the conference; or (3) at the mutual request of the parties. Cancellation requests made within 10 days of a party s receipt of the BRC set notice are unrestricted. Thereafter, the Division shall grant a cancellation only if it determines that there is good cause. For such reason, requests for cancellation or rescheduling after that 10-day period, including those which are agreed to or unopposed, shall be granted only for good cause to cancel or reschedule the BRC. TRIAL OR SOCIAL SECURITY HEARING CONFLICTS When a cancellation is requested due to counsel for one of the parties having been set for trial, a request should provide the following information, to the extent known: Style, Cause Number and Court Coordinator s (or Clerk s) name and telephone number Date of trial setting (or date range of docket) Case position on the docket With this information, the Benefit Review Officer or docket clerk can verify the conflict if they choose to do so. If there is insufficient information provided to verify the court setting or assignment, the Benefit Review Officer may deny the cancellation and request such additional information as necessary. Requests for cancellation or rescheduling must be granted for docket conflicts in federal courts, state courts, county courts, city courts, and Social Security administrative hearings. EARLY REQUESTS FOR CANCELLATION OR RESCHEDULING ENCOURAGED A request for cancellation or rescheduling prior to a BRC should be submitted to the Division as early as possible. The Division has a limited capacity to conduct BRCs. If a cancellation or rescheduling request is granted 20 days or more before the scheduled BRC date, there is a reasonable chance for another BRC to be scheduled in its place. When a BRC is cancelled or rescheduled and another BRC cannot be scheduled in its place, the Division s capacity to conduct BRCs is diminished, compromising its ability to meet the requirement to schedule a BRC within 40 days after the date the BRC was requested. FIRMS WITH MULTIPLE ATTORNEYS Firms with multiple attorneys are not required to provide a substitute attorney if the request confirms that no other attorney is reasonably available to handle the BRC.

PRE-BRC PREPARATION AND DISCOVERY REQUESTS With the current limitation of two BRCs, it is critical that parties thoroughly evaluate their cases so their information regarding the issues in dispute is fully developed before the BRC. In addition to exchanging pertinent information as required by rule 141.4, before requesting a BRC, it would be prudent for all parties to: Request the appointment of a designated doctor when desired (A designated doctor is required for all maximum medical improvement and impairment rating disputes.) Request any needed clarification from the designated doctor Subpoena evidence not otherwise available to support their position Subpoena requests should be submitted with a proper order and subpoena form, if applicable, attached. Subpoenas should be submitted in completed form ready for signing by the Hearing Officer. Copies of approved or suggested forms for such documents are attached for the convenience of BRC participants, although use of any legally sufficient form is appropriate and nothing herein should be construed as requiring the exclusive use of the attached forms. II. BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES IN THE FIELD OFFICE WITH PARTIES PRESENT TIME ALLOCATED FOR BRCs The time allocated for BRCs is 45 minutes or 1hour; however, where deemed reasonable and necessary, additional time for the BRC will be allowed by the Benefit Review Officer. EXCHANGE OF PERTINENT INFORMATION Parties should exchange pertinent information in accordance with Rule 141.4. To the extent practical, duplicates should be removed. Parties exchanges will not be retained by the Division as a part of the claim file. FOREIGN LANGUAGE EXCHANGES Exchanges in a language other than English should be accompanied by an English translation. EXCHANGE SUMMARIES Where they will enhance the understanding of the facts, summaries are encouraged. Summaries in accounting formats are particularly helpful regarding financial matters such as wages and establishing regular support for dependents. ELECTRONIC EXCHANGES Exchanges in electronic form must be in a format that is compatible with electronic players available to the Benefit Review Officer. At this time Benefit Review Officers have video tape players, DVD players, and compact disc players. The party offering electronic exchange should identify relevant portions by, for example, time and/or counter number display so that such portions may be easily accessed and identified. WITNESS STATEMENTS Electronically recorded witness statements should be transcribed. Witnesses may appear in person or telephonically at the discretion of the Benefit Review Officer. 2

CONDUCT BY PARTIES IN A BRC Parties and participants shall conduct themselves with dignity, shall show courtesy and respect for one another and for the Benefit Review Officer, and shall follow the decorum prescribed by the Benefit Review Officer. ACCOMMODATIONS BY TELEPHONE AT BRCs Telephone attendance at a BRC may be provided as an accommodation to a party. The Benefit Review Officer has the discretion to determine when telephone attendance will be allowed at a BRC. The Benefit Review Officer's determination will depend on several factors including: the facts of the case, the parties involved the exchange and availability of pertinent information, and any other extenuating circumstances (scheduling conflicts, illness, emergency situations, etc.). Parties may request to have a witness attend by speaker telephone. Whenever possible, parties should request approval for telephone attendance for a specified witness or witnesses before the BRC with notice to the other parties. STATEMENT OF POSITION The Benefit Review Officer will elicit each party's statement of position regarding each disputed issue Where there is a question of law, it is appropriate for the parties to address it in the statement of position and give references to applicable portions of the Act, Rules, Appeals Panel Decision Manual, appeals court decisions and Appeals Panel Decisions. The Benefit Review Officer shall determine, within his or her discretion, the order in which statements of positions will be offered. INTERLOCUTORY ORDERS An interlocutory order is a temporary order; effective only until it expires by its terms, is revoked by the Division or is superseded by agreement of the parties or decision and order of a hearing officer. A party may request an interlocutory order during the Benefit Review Conference verbally or by completing form DWC-058 when the issues in dispute are proceeding to Contested Case Hearing. The opposing party will be given an opportunity to respond to the request. The decision of whether to issue an order is left to the discretion of the benefit review officer. The officer has three (3) days to make a determination and will do so based on their knowledge of workers compensation law, rules, AP decisions, policy and review of information presented at the Benefit Review Conference. PROPOSED STIPULATIONS Parties ready and willing to stipulate to facts not in dispute that are required to be established to support any CCH issue may use proposed stipulations to document those facts at the BRC. BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCE REPORT The Benefit Review Conference Report identifies issues resolved at the BRC and disputed issues that are proceeding to CCH. The Benefit Review Officer will identify each disputed issue using Standard Issue Statements whenever possible. Issues raised by the parties that are not identifiable as a specific standard issue may, at the discretion of the Benefit Review officer, be identified as separate issue or, if subsumed in the standard issue statement, be included in the parties position. Parties may respond to the Benefit Review Conference report in accordance with Rule 142.7 to request the Hearing Officer include issue(s) not identified as unresolved. 3

III. TELEPHONIC AND VIDEOCONFERENCE BENEFIT REVIEW CONFERENCES Benefit Review Conferences in which the parties appear by telephone or videoconference equipment shall be conducted pursuant to the practices and procedures set out above, except as provided below: TELEPHONIC BRCs Texas Labor Code, 410.005 allows the Division to conduct BRCs telephonically with the injured employee's agreement. Requests for Telephonic Benefit Review Conferences made pursuant to 410.005 shall be made in the form and manner prescribed by the Division. If the injured employee is requesting or is agreeable to a telephonic BRC, the conference may be conducted with all parties attending by telephone. In accordance with 410.005, the Division has the discretion to determine when a telephonic BRC will be held. TELEPHONIC BRC SET NOTICES Set notices for telephonic BRCs will indicate that the parties need not attend in person. Telephonic BRC instructions will be provided to the parties prior to the BRC or with the BRC set notice. PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR THE TELEPHONIC BRC Parties shall ensure that their respective exchanges are received by the benefit review officer and all other parties at least two working days prior to the date of the BRC as exchanges cannot reasonably be made at the BRC. TELEPHONE CALL FOR THE BRC The benefit review officer will set up the conference call between the parties. Parties may participate by cellular telephone but must have a landline available should the cellular transmission be unsatisfactory. CONFIDENTIALITY The right of the Claimant to confidentiality of claim file information is not waived by a telephonic conference, and only persons entitled to attend the BRC may be present for the teleconference. Each party shall announce the names of all persons in his or her respective office. PROCEDURES DURING THE BRC Each party shall participate in the same manner as it would if the proceeding were conducted with the Benefit Review Officer and parties in the same room. If any situation arises that cannot be resolved by electronic means at the time of the BRC, the Benefit Review Officer may reset the conference to another date, by either teleconference or BRC in the field office with the parties in attendance VIDEOCONFERENCE BRC BRCs may be conducted by videoconference. However, equipment, space and support personnel are limited making this a rare option. The foregoing provisions pertaining to telephonic BRCs shall also apply to a videoconference BRC. SCHEDULING TELEPHONIC CCHs Telephone CCHs may be scheduled at the conclusion of a BRC if the parties agree to a telephone CCH at the benefit review conference. This procedure will be offered by the Benefit Review Officer only under the following circumstances: a) the claimant is represented by an attorney; 4

b) no interpreter is needed; c) no witness other than the claimant is expected to offer testimony; d) the evidence is not voluminous; and e) contentious litigation is not anticipated. The Benefit Review Officer may schedule a telephone CCH upon agreement of the parties in the event no Hearing Officer is assigned to the field office where venue is proper or because no hearing date is available within the 60-day statutory timeframe in the field office where venue is proper. 5