Critical thinking at postgraduate level



Similar documents
Module Handbook. Literature Review Project (Nursing) NM3733. RN/BSc (Hons) Nursing 2009 Curriculum. Research Theme. September 2008 cohort

Developing your Graduate Attributes: MA in Marketing

Course Specification MSc Accounting (MSACT)

How To Be A Successful Marketing Consultant

Critical analysis. Be more critical! More analysis needed! That s what my tutors say about my essays. I m not really sure what they mean.

Teaching and Learning Methods

MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis

Library, Teaching and Learning. Writing Essays. and other assignments Lincoln University

English 101, WB12: Academic Writing University of Maryland, College Park Summer Session I 2015 Course Policies

Teaching institution: Institute of Education, University of London

The College Standard

Critical Thinking. I m not sure what they expect when they ask us to critically evaluate

MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management

MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management

Pearson Edexcel BTEC Level 7 Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership

Nottingham Trent University Course Specification

UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON. POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MRes Clinical research. Final award Intermediate awards available N/A.

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR

[C115/SQP220] NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS. Advanced Higher English Principles of Marking [C115/SQP220] 33

Programme name Mathematical Science with Computer Science Mathematical Science with Computer Science with Placement

HENLEY BUSINESS SCHOOL DOCTORAL PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis

COURSE SYLLABUS PHILOSOPHY 001 CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING SPRING 2012

Programme Specification Postgraduate Programmes

MA in Health and Social Care

Plymouth University. Programme Specification. Faculty of Business. Master of Business Administration Plymouth Graduate School of Management

Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University. A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15

MA/Postgraduate Diploma in Counselling

Philosophical argument

Department/Academic Unit: Economics Degree Program: MA

IAM Levels 4 and 5. Certificate in Business and Administrative Management. Qualification handbook edition

UNIVERSITY OF READING

MSc in International Marketing Course Handbook 2015/16

master s courses fashion & law

Planning a Critical Review ELS. Effective Learning Service

Lancaster University Doctoral Programme in Clinical Psychology Guidelines for Thesis Format: Advice to internal and external examiners

Programme Specification BA (Hons) Business and Management

BA (Hons) Business Administration

Criteria for the Accreditation of. MBM Programmes

Specialist Certificate in Business Relationship Management Syllabus. Version 1.2

master s courses fashion promotion, communication & media

Programme Specification. Doctor of Education. Valid from: Sept 2015 Programme Code: PX3AA

Undergraduate Psychology Major Learning Goals and Outcomes i

Doctor of Philosophy. Programme of Study for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

HOW TO WRITE A CRITICAL ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. John Hubert School of Health Sciences Dalhousie University

MASTER S COURSES FASHION RETAIL MANAGEMENT

ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

GRADE 11 English Language Arts Standards Pacing Guide. 1 st Nine Weeks

master s courses fashion photography

2012/2013 Programme Specification Data. Financial Management

HIGHER DIPLOMA BUSINESS FINANCE

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for BA (Hons) International Business

BUSINESS REPORTS. The Writing Centre Department of English

Integrated degree of PhD and LLM (Legal Studies) 1

Literature survey: historical and theoretical background. The chapter requires you to have done some library and company research to:

British School of Commerce

Assoc Degree Applic. - Transfer to UC/CSU/Private

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Design Engineering and Manufacturing Management

MSc Logistics and Supply Chain Management

MSc Construction Project Management

Critical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean?

PROGRAMMME SPECIFICATION FOR MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES)

Same-Sex Marriage: Breeding Ground for Logical Fallacies

Doctor of Education - Higher Education

Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

MASTER S COURSES FASHION & LUXURY BRAND MANAGEMENT

master s courses fashion & luxury brand management

Cleveland College of Art & Design BA (Hons) Fashion Enterprise Programme Handbook

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Programme name International Business Law (distance learning)

3. Programme accredited by Currently accredited by the BCS. 8. Date of programme specification Students entering in October 2013

Section 1: Programme Specification 1. Award - BA (Hons)

MSc in Management and Entrepreneurship

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Chartered Institute of Management Accounting (CIMA) Certificate Level (C01 to C05)

Intermediate Certificate in Energy and Cost Management in the Data Centre Syllabus

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Programme Specification

Section 1: Programme Specification 1. Award - BA (Hons)

Procedures for Submission and Examination of Doctoral Degrees in University College Cork. October 2014

Business School Writing an Essay

MSc in Physics Research For students entering in 2006

PGCert/PGDip/MA Education PGDip/Masters in Teaching and Learning (MTL) Programme Specifications

Programme Title: MSc/Diploma/Certificate in Advancing Nursing Practice

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for BA (Hons) Business Management (Marketing)

Criteria for the Accreditation of. DBA Programmes

Transcription:

GET AHEAD POSTGRADUATE SUMMER PROGRAMME 2015 Critical thinking at postgraduate level Sara Steinke s.steinke@bbk.ac.uk

Aims of the session a) What is meant by critical thinking - b) the importance of critical thinking skills for postgraduate study - c) questions for undertaking critical analyses of yours and other s work a) What is meant by academic argument - b) the role of academic argument in advanced critical thinking in postgraduate study Recognise what makes a sound academic argument Reflect on how you can develop your critical thinking skills

What is critical thinking? (1) Cottrell, S. The Study Skills Handbook 1. Stand back from the information given 2. Examine it in detail from many angles 3. Check whether it is accurate 4. Check each statement follows logically 5. Look for possible flaws in the reasoning / evidence / conclusion 6. Compare the same issue from point of view of theorists / writers

What is critical thinking? (2) 7. Explain why different people arrive at different conclusions 8. Argue why one opinion /result /conclusion is preferable to another 9. Be on guard for devices that encourage the reader to take questionable statements at face value 10. Check for hidden assumptions 11. Check for attempts to lure the reader into agreement

Critical thinking involves Agreeing or disagreeing with a point of view Conceding that an argument may have this merit but Comparing different view points Proposing a different point of view Bringing together differing points view by adding a new perspective Applying your knowledge to different contexts Coming to a conclusion and being able to make inferences

Process of critical thinking 1. Analyse (take apart) Look at the key points, arguments and underlying assumptions Comprehend the key points and arguments Compare and contrast arguments Look at the different components of the argument and how they relate to each other 2. Synthesise (put together) Pull together different arguments to express an idea Make logical connections to serve one argument 3. Evaluate (create your own) Criticise views you do not agree with Weigh up and come to your own judgement Justify your view with the evidence you have found and develop your own arguments

Think about the following You have been asked to read an article in preparation for a lecture. What questions might you ask in order to think critically about the article? 1. What is the main argument of the article? 2. What are the reasons given to justify the argument? 3. What evidence has been used? 4. What do you know about the author? 5. What audience is the author addressing? 6. What sources has the author used?

Importance of critical thinking Cornerstone of all academic activity Helps you to adopt a critical distance towards yours and other peoples work / ideas Means of pushing the boundaries of knowledge forward by examining the messy, grey area Goes hand-in-hand with academic content Essential for developing other academic skills Promotes an (pro)active, independent and reflective approach to learning Transferable skill to the workplace

Importance of advanced critical thinking for postgraduate study (1) 1. Greater engagement with methodology 2. Required to write a literature review 3. Knowledge management / problem solving in the research process 4. Reflected in the structure of a dissertation 5. Related to improved motivation, time management - and battle against procrastination, isolation

Importance of advanced critical thinking for postgraduate study (2) 5. Preparing for / defending your thesis in your viva 6. Presentation skills - conference / teaching 7. Research ethics 8. Managing discussion in small groups 9. Writing for different audiences 10. Creative thinking 11. Managing your supervisor

Key aspects of advanced critical Identifying arguments thinking Structure, logic, consistency and reasoning Identifying assumptions - premises and connotations Identifying flaws in arguments - false analogies, emotive, tautology, misrepresentation Providing evidence - authentic, valid, reliable, robust and current

Think about the following 1. What is the difference between personal opinion and academic argument? Academic argument = effort to convince; presentation of support 2. What is the difference between academic argument and disagreement?

The main difference between argument and opinion is 'Opinions are personal beliefs' and 'Arguments are reasons (which can include facts) given to support a point of view'. Stella Cottrell (2003, p179). By this definition, opinions, in general are unsubstantiated claims. However, when substance, in the form of 'evidence' is applied to these claims, they can become arguments... As such, opinions in general do not try to change other people's point of view. However it is for this reason the premise of argument exists, to change other people's perspective or view on an issue... http://www.markedbyteachers.com/

Position = a point of view Agreement = to concur with someone else s point of view Disagreement = to hold a different point of view from someone else Argument = using reasons to support a point of view, so that known or unknown audiences may be persuaded to agree. An argument may include disagreement, but is more than simply disagreement if it is based on reasons.

In your written work you should always be trying to construct sound arguments. Unsound arguments will attract poor grades from assessors. Learning in Higher Education involves more than the memorisation of large amounts of information and its subsequent accurate regurgitation during examinations or assignments. In many subjects the process of assessment involves taking information and assembling, synthesising and rearranging it into new patterns that both form sound arguments and solve the problems set in assignments titles and examination questions. http://www.staffs.ac.uk

Think about the following 1. What are the differences between a sound and an unsound academic argument?

A sound argument is a point of view that has been developed through the application of reasoning and critical analysis, drawing conclusions from the available evidence, and doing so using logic, objectivity, and other agreed intellectual standards. An unsound argument, on the other hand, is a point of view that is in some way flawed. It could be that it is weak and unconvincing, or is based on an unbalanced analysis of the available evidence. It could also be that there is a mistake in reasoning - a so called logical fallacy. http://www.essex.ac.uk/

Developing critical thinking skills Take the time to pause and reflect - go over notes and what you have written Engage actively in your learning - use colour markers when reading, check your understanding Question what you read / hear - be ready to disagree Trust your own judgement - even if that seems risky. Critical thinking is about taking risks. Talk to your peers - check each others understanding, have a constructive argument

Use critical skills when Reading for academic purposes Note-making for academic purposes Writing in an academic style

Useful books Cottrell, S. (2005) Critical Thinking Skills (London: Palgrave) Roy van den Brink-Budgen (2000) Critical Thinking for Students: learn the skills of critical assessment and effective argument 3 rd edition (Oxford: HowToBooks) Roy van den Brink-Budgen (2010) Advanced Critical Thinking Skills (Oxford: HowToBooks)

Useful websites http://warren.ucsd.edu/_files/writing-center/academic arguments.pdf http://www.essex.ac.uk/myskills/skills/thinking/identifyevaluateargume nt.asp http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1503447.files/other%20hand outs/elements.pdf http://library.bcu.ac.uk/learner/writingguides/1.15.htm http://www.palgrave.com/skills4study/studyskills/thinking/index.asp

Useful activities http://www.palgrave.com/skills4study/mp3s.asp#critical 12 minute audio file based on Cottrell s Critical Thinking Skills http://www.bbk.ac.uk/mybirkbeck/get-ahead-stay ahead/skills/critical-thinking 5 minute interactive tutorials supporting this Student Orientation programme http://www.bbk.ac.uk/mybirkbeck/studyskills/course_tim etable academic skills workshops dealing with critical thinking skills -and other academic skills - in greater detail

Recap of the session Do you understand what is meant by advanced critical thinking, in particular what is meant by a sound academic argument? Are you clear about the importance of advanced critical thinking for postgraduate study? Have you identified ways to develop your critical thinking skills and powers of argument and persuasion?