Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/29/15 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSIOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 5:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/08/14 1 of 14. PageID #: 1

)

UNITEDSTATESDISTRlCTCOURT ~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RlCHMOND DIVISION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. No.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1of10 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION 2Dub APR - 3 PI: 41 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

II. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THIS CHARGE

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/10/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA COMPLAINT

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff United States of America ( United States"), alleges:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORIGIA-~~T ~:J,-~T,>cURT SAVANNAH DIVISION j Ga. NATURE OF THE ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 1:12-cv BEL Document 1 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Northern Division)

unlawful employment practices on the basis of disabilityand to provide appropriate relief to

Case 3:12-cv REP Document 1 Filed 05/31/12 Page 1 of 29 PagelD# 1

Case 1:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2013 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

Case 3:14-cv H-JMA Document 1 Filed 03/24/14 Page 1 of 11. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.

Case 2:15-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 1

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

: : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

O8. RECEIVED Civil Clk' Office. JUN Superior Court of th District of Cohmibja

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 4:15-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/24/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 3:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:08-cv WMS Document 2 Filed 12/23/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

1. This is a civil action brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services Employment and. Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C ( USERRA ).

Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case 1:14-cv PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONSENT DECREE. Introduction

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ) ) ) FHEO No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUIDANCE ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR ALL EMPLOYERS IN NEW YORK STATE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Fraud - Trading Commodity Futures

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Woman From Being Fired From A Prison

Case 2:05-cv JDB-tmp Document 41 Filed 07/12/2006 Page 1 of 15

Case 4:08-cv MHS-ALM Document 58 Filed 06/30/2009 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

HOUSING RIGHTS FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, SEXUAL ASSAULT AND STALKING SURVIVORS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ST ATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO. COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON. March 17, 2007, persons have gathered on the public sidewalk at 9 th and SW Morrison near the

Case 1:15-cv RP Document 1 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2: 15-cv JFW-FFM Document 16 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:248 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : :

Plaintiff Carol Parker ( Plaintiff ), residing at 32 Coleman Way, Jackson, NJ 08527, by her undersigned counsel, alleges the following upon personal

Case 2:02-cv WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. SUMMARY

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,

Transcription:

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. DALE VANDERVENNEN JACK VANDERVENNEN, LINDA VANDERVENNEN, DDJ RENTAL REAL ESTATE, LLC CALCUTTA ASSOCIATES, LLC, and LLJ, LLC, Defendants. COMPLAINT The United States of America alleges as follows: 1. This action is brought by the United States to enforce the provisions of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the Fair Housing Act), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1345 and 42 U.S.C. 3614(a). 3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) because the actions and omissions giving rise to the United States allegations occurred in the Western District of Michigan, and Defendants reside and/or do business in the Western District of Michigan. 1

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 2 of 8 Page ID#2 THE PARTIES 4. Defendant Jack VanderVennen is a resident of Byron Center, Michigan. 5. Defendant Linda VanderVennen is a resident of Byron Center, Michigan. 6. Defendant Dale VanderVennen is a resident of Grandville, Michigan. 7. Defendant DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC is a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Michigan and has its principal place of business located at 1500 76th Street, SE, Byron Center, Michigan 49315. Defendant Jack VanderVennen is the president of and resident agent for DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC. Defendant Dale VanderVennen is a manager and/or member of DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC. 8. Defendant Calcutta Associates, LLC is a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Michigan and has its principal place of business located at 1500 76th Street, SE, Byron Center, Michigan 49315. Defendant Jack VanderVennen is an officer of and resident agent for Calcutta Associates, LLC. Defendant Dale VanderVennen is a manager and/or member of Calcutta Associates, LLC. 9. Defendant LLJ, LLC is a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Michigan and has its principal place of business located at 1500 76th Street, SE, Byron Center, Michigan 49315. Defendant Jack VanderVennen is an officer of and resident agent for LLJ, LLC. Defendant Dale VanderVennen is a member and/or owner of LLJ, LLC. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 10. Alger Meadow Apartments consists of sixteen multi-family residential buildings located in Grand Rapids, Michigan. 2

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 3 of 8 Page ID#3 11. At all times relevant to this action, Defendant Dale VanderVennen has managed and continues to manage residential rental properties, including Alger Meadow Apartments, throughout the Grand Rapids metropolitan area ( Subject Properties ). 12. At all times relevant to this action, Defendants Jack VanderVennen (individually) and Linda VanderVennen (jointly with Defendant Jack VanderVennen) have owned and operated residential rental properties in or around the Grand Rapids metropolitan area, including ten of the sixteen buildings at Alger Meadow Apartments. 13. At all times relevant to this action, Defendant DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC has owned and operated residential rental properties in or around the Grand Rapids metropolitan area, including five of the sixteen buildings at Alger Meadow Apartments. 14. At all times relevant to this action, Defendant Calcutta Associates, LLC has owned and operated residential rental properties in or around the Grand Rapids metropolitan area, including one of the sixteen buildings at Alger Meadow Apartments. 15. The rental units at the Subject Properties are dwellings within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. 3602(b). 16. At all times relevant to this action, Defendants Jack VanderVennen, Linda VanderVennen, DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC, LLJ, LLC, and Calcutta Associates, LLC (collectively, Owner-Manager Defendants ) have employed Defendant Dale VanderVennen as their agent to manage the Subject Properties. 17. At all times relevant to this action, the Owner-Manager Defendants have provided Defendant Dale VanderVennen, in his capacity as property manager, with the actual or apparent authority to receive applications for tenancy; to accept or reject prospective tenants; to use keys to access residents apartments; to collect rents and fees; to make repairs in residents 3

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 4 of 8 Page ID#4 apartments; to charge tenants fees for repairs or other issues related to their housing; to make adjustments to the amounts of rent, fees, or security deposits; and to evict tenants or otherwise enforce lease provisions. 18. Since at least 2008 through the present, Defendant Dale VanderVennen has subjected, and continues to subject, female tenants and prospective tenants of the Subject Properties to discrimination on the basis of sex, including severe, pervasive, and unwelcome sexual harassment, on multiple occasions. Such conduct has included, but is not limited to: a. Making unwelcome sexual comments and unwelcome sexual advances to female tenants or prospective female tenants, including subjecting female tenants to unwanted sexual touching; b. Touching himself in a sexual manner in the presence of female tenants; c. Entering the residences of female tenants without permission or notice; d. Conditioning or offering tangible housing benefits in exchange for sexual acts; and e. Taking adverse housing actions, or threatening to take such actions, against female tenants or prospective female tenants who have objected to and/or would not continue to grant sexual favors. 19. In addition, Defendant Dale VanderVennen has regularly expressed a preference for female tenants. 20. The discriminatory incidents described herein occurred while Defendant Dale VanderVennen was exercising his authority as property manager at Alger Meadow Apartments, including but not limited to discussing rental applications with prospective tenants, using the 4

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 5 of 8 Page ID#5 keys given to him by the Owner-Manager Defendants to enter apartments, making repairs to units, and/or enforcing lease provisions. 21. Defendants Jack and Linda VanderVennen, and Defendants Calcutta Associates, LLC, DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC, and LLJ, LLC, are liable for the actions of their agent, Dale VanderVennen. The Owner-Manager Defendants hired Dale VanderVennen to serve as the property manager for the Subject Properties that they own or manage, and Defendants Jack and Linda VanderVennen, and Defendants Calcutta Associates, LLC, DDJ Rental Real Estate, LLC, and LLJ, LLC, by and through the knowledge of its officers, knew or should have known of Dale VanderVennen s discriminatory conduct, had the authority to take preventive and corrective action, yet failed to take reasonable preventive or corrective measures. CAUSE OF ACTION 22. By the actions and statements described above, Defendants have: a. Denied housing or otherwise made housing unavailable because of sex, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 3604(a); b. Discriminated in the terms, conditions, or privileges of the rental of dwellings, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of sex, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 3604(b); c. Made statements with respect to the rental of dwellings that indicate a preference, limitation, or discrimination based on sex, in violation 42 U.S.C. 3604(c); and d. Coerced, intimidated, threatened, or interfered with persons in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of their having exercised or enjoyed, their rights granted or protected by Section 804 of the Fair Housing Act, in violation of 42 U.S.C. 3617. 5

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 6 of 8 Page ID#6 23. Defendants conduct described above constitutes: a. A pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of the rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq., or b. A denial to a group of persons of rights granted by the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq., which denial raises an issue of general public importance. 24. Female tenants, prospective tenants, and persons associated with them have been injured by the Defendants discriminatory conduct. Such persons are aggrieved persons as defined in 42 U.S.C. 3602(i), and have suffered damages as a result of Defendants conduct. 25. The Defendants conduct was intentional, willful, and/or taken in reckless disregard of the rights of others. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the United States requests that the Court enter an Order that: a. Declares that Defendants discriminatory practices violate the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.; b. Enjoins Defendants, their agents, employees, and successors, and all other persons in the active concert or participation with them from: i. Discriminating on basis of sex, including engaging in sexual harassment, in any aspect of the rental of a dwelling; ii. Interfering with or threatening to take any action against any person engaged in the exercise or enjoyment of rights granted or protected by the Fair Housing Act, as amended; iii. Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to restore, as nearly as practicable, the victims of Defendants past unlawful 6

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 7 of 8 Page ID#7 practices to the position they would have been in but for the discriminatory conduct; and iv. Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to prevent the recurrence of any discriminatory conduct in the future and to eliminate, as nearly as practicable, the effects of Defendants unlawful practices; c. Awards monetary damages to each person aggrieved by Defendants discriminatory conduct, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3614(d)(1)(B); d. Assesses civil penalties against Defendants in order to vindicate the public interest, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3614(d)(1)(c); and e. Awards such additional relief as the interests of justice may require. 7

Case 1:13-cv-01069 Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 8 of 8 Page ID#8 Dated: September 30, 2013 Respectfully submitted, ERIC HOLDER Attorney General PATRICK A. MILES, JR. United States Attorney _s/jocelyn Samuels JOCELYN SAMUELS Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division _s/agnes M. Kempker-Cloyd AGNES M. KEMPKER-CLOYD Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney s Office Western District of Michigan 330 Ionia Avenue N.W Suite 501 Phone: (616) 808-2067 Fax: (616) 456-2408 _s/steven H. Rosenbaum STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM Chief Housing and Civil Enforcement Section _s/mary J. Hahn TIMOTHY MORAN Deputy Chief MARY J. HAHN DC Bar No. 500193 Trial Attorney Housing and Civil Enforcement Section Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Northwestern Building, 7th Floor Washington, DC 20530 Phone: (202) 305-0921 Fax: (202) 514-1116 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 8