January, 2009. Prepared By. Steve Haze, Program Director. Fresno, California



Similar documents
Building Resilient Infrastructure for the 21 st Century

The Budget: Effectively Implementing The 2014 Water Bond

Cross-Valley Contractors Interim Renewal Contracts

Municipal Water District of Orange County. Regional Urban Water Management Plan

GIS MAPPING FOR IRRIGATION DISTRICT RAPID APPRAISALS Daniel J. Howes 1, Charles M. Burt 2, Stuart W. Styles 3 ABSTRACT

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Flood Damage Reduction Technical Appendix

Bill Swanson MWH Water Resources Practice Leader

Securing California s Water Future

WATER QUALITY, SUPPLY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF Funding Summary

Agriculture Technology Economic Cluster Wireless Broadband Infrastructure ROBERT TSE

GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

DWR Drops State Water Project Allocation to Zero, Seeks to Preserve Remaining Supplies

Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

Roosevelt Water Conservation District ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

CALIFORNIA WATER SOLUTIONS NOW

ELIMINATE STORM WATER FROM ENTERING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS

Introduction. So, What Is a Btu?

Water Security Agency. Plan for saskatchewan.ca

The Planning Process. 1 O WOW 1.0 Plan Moving Towards Sustainability

PHOTO: Jon Waterman THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA, CIRCA NOW OPEN BOOKLET TO SEE CHANGE

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Water Utility Financial Plan and Rates Study

ELMER AVENUE. Water Augmentation Study NEIGHBORHOOD RETROFIT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

NEVADA CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT INQUIRY

Energy and Cost Required to Lift or Pressurize Water

Greater Los Angeles County Region

DIRECT POTABLE REUSE: A PATH FORWARD:

~xccuti\lc :Bcpertmcnt


NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

HOW TO FUND BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS? Invest in IWRM - it pays back!

Subsidence Mitigation Through Rice Cultivation Research Project Goals:

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

BUDGET GLOSSARY. Acre-Foot/Acre-Feet (AF). A unit of measure equivalent to 325,851 gallons of water.

The Bathtub Ring. Shrinking Lake Mead: Impacts on Water Supply, Hydropower, Recreation and the Environment

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

Introduction to Rainwater Harvesting. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Texas A&M University

Ring s Reflections. by Bob Ring. Tucson s Waterworld

C alifornia needs a statewide water policy that gives all Californians

Resolving complex issues with large scale river restoration; a case study: the San Joaquin River in California

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

LDPCSD Water Supply Emergency Response Plan Status Update

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

California Future Water Demand Projections (WEAP Model): Implications on Energy Demand

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

MONTEREY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESERVOIR OPERA TIO NS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS

NOTICE TO STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS

Sihwa Tidal Power Plant: a success of environment and energy policy in Korea

Station #1 Interpreting Infographs

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

PROPOSED REHABILITATION SAN CARLOS IRRIGATION PROJECT FACILITIES. Pinal County, Arizona. Scoping Information and Opportunity to Comment

Plan Groundwater Procurement, Implementation and Costs, prepared for the Brazos River Authority, July 2005.

Foothill Municipal Water District Recycled Water Project

City of Cambridge Climate Protection Action Committee. Recommendations for Adaptation to Climate Change. Purpose

RECLAMATION. Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study. Managing Water in the West. Executive Summary

Energy Measurements and Conversions


CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 2009 GENERAL RATE CASE CHAPTER: 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF APPLICATION

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. Walgreens Drug Store 3315 South H Street Bakersfield, CA 93304

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study


How To Improve Water Resources Information And Analysis For Integrated Water Management

Addressing Declining Elevations in Lake Mead

Pay Later: The Cost of Inaction. Climate change will have a negative impact on many of the industries that

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ANGEL SLOUGH SUBINVENTORY UNIT. Butte County Water Advisory Committee Member Catherine Cottle

Transcription:

TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Water Quality, Quantity and Reliability A Concept Proposal that supports Safe, Clean, Reliable Drinking Water Supplies and Regional Self-Sufficiency in the San Joaquin Valley January, 2009 Prepared By Steve Haze, Program Director Fresno, California

Tulare Lake Restoration Concept Proposal Techniicall,, Enviironmentall and Fiinanciiall Based Synopsiis A Catalyst for moving towards Regional Self-Sufficiency In the San Joaquin Valley There are a number of significant challenges facing California when it comes to managing our precious water resources in all regions of the state including most importantly the overwhelming pressures being placed upon the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This has been demonstrated through programs such as CALFED a State and Federal Consortium and more recently the Governor s Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. Additional pressures are now being placed on the delta to move massive amounts of water southward with the resurrection of what is known as the Peripheral Canal. The restoration of the Tulare Lake basin in the San Joaquin Valley is a unique opportunity to provide for the quality, quantity and reliable regional sourcing and use of water for agricultural, economic development and environmental needs on a self-sufficiency basis. At one time, Tulare Lake was the largest freshwater body west of the Mississippi River storing up to 25 million acre feet. The concept proposal based upon technical, financial and environmental analysis is superior to the only other storage proposal currently under study within the San Joaquin Valley known as Temperance Flat on the Upper San Joaquin River above Millerton Lake/Friant Dam. As an example, the restoration of just 10% of the historic Tulare Lake would be nearly twice the surface storage capacity of Temperance Flat let alone the fact that the Tulare Lake basin provides ground water storage capabilities as well and Temperance does not. Another important distinction between Temperance Flat versus Tulare Lake is the fact that the Tulare Lake basin can support the collection and management of flood waters from at a minimum of four south Sierra river systems Kings, Kaweah, Tule, and Kern as well as the upper San Joaquin. Temperance Flat would only support the flood waters of the upper San Joaquin River. With a $42.5 Billion budget imbalance and with the taxpayers of California being fatigued by expensive bond measures, the Tulare Lake concept proposal can be developed for less than 1/5 th the cost of Temperance Flat which is now hovering at $5 Billion and climbing. Imagine with the development of Tulare Lake, that the people of California can get twice the storage; four times the flood water management capability; save taxpayers over 80% of the construction costs; be a catalyst for regional self-sufficiency and relieve the amount of pressure being placed on the delta environmentally and on south delta exports.

Comparison of Temperance versus Millerton Enlargement and Tulare Lake Basin Surface Storage Facility Benefit or Impact Temperance Tulare Cost >$5 Billion < $1 Billion Maxiimum Storage 1.3M acre Ft 2.5M acre Ft or greater 5 Rivers Fllexiibiilliity of Conveyance None 3 Canals Use of exiistiing Maximum Minimal iinfrastructure Leverage Fllood Controll - Riivers 1 4 Liink to Calliiforniia Aqueduct None Yes Loss of Cllean Yes 216 Giga Hydroellectriiciity Watt Hours / year No Loss Groundwater storage / rechargiing None Yes Bii-Diirectiionall movement of water None Yes 2 Enviironmentall IImpacts Significant Minimal Enviironmentall IImprovements None Significant

CREATING FEASIBLE SURFACE STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA The Challenges: 1). Save money 2). Leverage finances for best return on investment for taxpayers 3). Assure flexibility of new infrastructure 4). No direct or indirect impact to the environment 5). Minimize or reduce the impact of greenhouse gases and global warming 6). Complete projects on time, to cost and to specification 7). Work toward minimizing deficit spending or raising taxes 8). Pay as you go 9). Long term capital improvement with low cost maintenance 10). Multiple benefits to all Californians 11). Leverage off of existing infrastructure Tulare Basin Background and Overall CVP/SWP System Benefits Historic Tulare Lake was once the largest freshwater lake west of the Mississippi River Historic Tulare Lake was 50 miles by 100 miles or 5,000 square miles Historic Tulare Lake covered over 3,200,000 acres with a depth ranging from 6 to 25 feet The Historic Tulare Lake stored approximately 25,600,000 acre feet of water - or 8.345 Trillion Gallons of water The storage capacity of the historic lake would serve the water needs of 26 to 40 million people in California -- and nearly all of agriculture's need At just 10% of its potential capacity - Tulare Lake could store over 2.56 Million acre feet of water This equates to the water needs of 2.6 to 4.0 million people This equates to nearly twice the storage capability of the largest dam being built at Temperance Flat Temperance Flat is now estimated to cost $5 Billion Dollars for a 1.3 million acre foot storage or $3,850 an acre ft. Tulare lake as managed storage and 10% increment would be 2.56 million acre feet or 2 times greater than Temperance Flat for only $195 an acre foot or @ 6.5% of the cost The capital outlay for the total system enhancements would be $313 an acre foot or 10.4% of the cost of a Temperance Flat Capital Outlays would not only systematically benefit the San Joaquin River - but also the Kings River, Kaweah, Tule and the California Aqueduct - thus allowing for greater flexibility in moving water around in a timely, reliable, cost effective and efficient way CALSIM II and/or CALSIM III could be enhanced to simulate system enhancements and performance Imagine if the Salton sea could store fresh water - and then imagine that Tulare Lake at one time was the largest freshwater lake in California - and can again be serving a thriving and growing California

San Joaquin Valley Tulare Basin Surface Storage and Conveyance Enhancement Capital Improvements Proposal (ILLUSTRATIVE ANALYSIS) Item Description Benefit Budget 1 Raise Millerton 25 Feet 1). Increase flood control by 130,000 acre ft. or 25% $ 220,000,000 2). Increase average new water by 25,000 acre feet per year 3). Utilize dead storage area of 135,000 acre ft. 4). Total average additional water for river restoration 150,000 acre feet. 5). Total average additional flood control range 235,000 acre ft. or 50% 2 Enhance Fresno Slough / James Bypass Intertie 1). Increase bi-directional conveyance between San Joaquin and Kings River Basins $ 50,000,000 2). Little or no environmental impact 3 Re-establish Tulare Lake as freshwater storage facility 1). Scalable Run-off Capture and Surface storage transfer facility $ 500,000,000 Feasibility, environmental, planning, engineering and Implementation 2). Capture run-off from both Kings and San Joaquin River Basins 3). Public Resource Declaration under California State Constitution 4). Conservation Easement Overlay 5). Scalable or incremental storage facility 6). Groundwater recharge and storage feature 7). Recreation, Tourism, Wildlife Refuge, Agriculture (e.g. rice growing) 8). Little or no environmental impact 9). Creates new habitat for various species 10). Contribute to cooling valley and reducing the creation of harmful ozone 11). No loss - or required replacement of hydroelectric power 12). Gravity Flow system - no significant requirement for additional electricity 13). No requirement for using electricity to pump into groundwater/water bank storage facility 14). Very little time to construct - natural berm 15). Do not have to compete for concrete, steel and aggregate - and drive up costs and create inflation in other sectors of the economy - such as roads, buildings and housing 4 Tulare Lake Storage Facility - California Aqueduct Intertie 1). Establish bi-directional conveyance and storage transfer next to Aqueduct $ 25,000,000 5 Tulare Lake Storage Facility - Friant-Kern Canal Intertie 1). Establish gravity flow conveyance off of Friant-Kern Canal to Tulare Lake surface storage $ 5,000,000 Total Estimated Capital Outlay (illustrative analysis) $ 800,000,000

TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Conveyance Hub with River and Canal Interties San Joaquin / Kings Intertie Friant-Kern Canal Kings River Intertie CA Aqueduct Intertie Tule River Cross Valley Canal

TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Conveyance Hub with River and Canal Interties Schematic Friant-Kern Kings Intertie Kings River Kaweah River Tule River San Joaquin / Kings Intertie Surface Groundwater Cross Valley Canal CA Aqueduct Intertie CA Department of Water Resources CALSIM-II

Contact Information Steve Haze, Program Director (559) 970-6320 34876 SJ and E Road Auberry, CA 93602 stevehaze007@gmail.com Principals Chris Acree Walt Shubin Richard Sloan Gary Temple Technical Advisors Dr. John Suen, California State University Fresno Sargeant Green Consultant to California Water Institute CSUF (Former GM Tranquility Irrigation District; Former Chair FCWA) Communications Advisor Dr. G. Gary Manross, PhD Strategy Research Institute

Reference Materials Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation (USJRBSI) Winter Newsletter 2005-2006 GIGAWATT (GW) - One thousand megawatts (1,000 MW) or, one million kilowatts (1,000,000 kw) or one billion watts (1,000,000,000 watts) of electricity. One gigawatt is enough to supply the electric demand of about one million average California homes. GIGAWATT-HOUR (GWH) - One million kilowatt-hours of electric power. California generated about 290,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2004.