DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS



Similar documents
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

Chapter 3.26 CAR RENTAL OCCUPATION TAX

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code through *

PUBLIC ENTITY POLICY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM OCCURRENCE COVERAGE

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Delaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq.

Introduction (916) (800)

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

Information for Worker s Compensation Clients

CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION COMMISSION - GUAM OPERATIONAL RULES AND REGULATIONS

RECOMMENDED ORDER AND DECISION

Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance.

STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER JB-05-5 (A. 9-11)

A New Headache For Employers: Whistleblower Claims Under the Affordable Care Act

Home Builder Licensing Law July 1, For the purposes of this chapter, the following words shall have the meanings ascribed herein:

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

PART IV GEORGIA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Key Provisions of Tennessee Senate Bill 200 Effective July 1, 2014, through July 1, 2016

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

AN ACT RELATING TO LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT; AMENDING THE MINIMUM WAGE ACT TO CREATE A PREFERENCE FOR CIVIL ACTIONS AND APPEALS

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

Disability Discrimination in the Workplace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BILL ANALYSIS. C.S.S.B By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Part 700 Tribal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (TOSHA)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION Student Hearing Office 810 First Street, NE, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20002

Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP

LAFOURCHE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #3 CIVIL SERVICE BOARD RULES RULE I

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Below is an overview of the Molex lease process as it applies to Molex Application Tooling equipment.

CHAPTER 167. AN ACT concerning the rights of residents of continuing care retirement communities and amending and supplementing P.L.1986, c.103.

NATURAL GAS ACT. (Note: All underlined material was added to the Natural Gas Act by the Energy Policy Act of 2005)

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830

Minnesota False Claims Act

WORKERS' COMPENSATION SECURITY FUND ACT Act of Jul. 1, 1937, P.L. 2532, No. 470 Cl. 77 AN ACT

CHAPTER OCCUPATIONAL THERAPISTS

GUIDANCE REGARDING EEO PROCEDURES (1/25/2000)

EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE PART ENDORSEMENT

(a) The title of this section and is and may be cited as the Tennessee Medicaid False Claims Act.

Jury/Witness duty leave

CONSUMER LOAN BROKER ACT Investigation of applicant; issuance or denial of license; time limit for acting on applications.

ISSUING AGENCY: New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Insurance Division. [7/1/97; NMAC - Rn & A, 13 NMAC 12.3.

CHAPTER HUMAN RIGHTS

Rules & Regulations Governing the Prescription Drug Program for the Uninsured

General complaint form for video/cable customers

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box Washington, DC Thuressa Ballard-Freeman, Complainant,

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 51 1

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. No.

Case 1:15-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 71

Arkansas Medicaid Fraud False Claims Act*

The False Claims Act: A Primer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM. JURY INFORMATION FOR EMpLOYERS

Regular Session, ACT No To amend and reenact R.S. 9:3573.1, (A), (1), (8), (9) and (10), ,

MARCH 5, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation.

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 93A Article 2 1

002 Applicant - Applicant shall mean any victim or other eligible party who has properly applied for compensation under the Act.

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico

OFFICE OF CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION

MARYLAND CODE Family Law. Subtitle 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

ERISA Causes of Action *

SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, and CITY EEO LAWS

TITLE 102 PROCEDURAL RULE WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW SERIES 1 RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

BILL ANALYSIS. Senate Research Center C.S.S.B By: Wentworth Jurisprudence 4/5/2007 Committee Report (Substituted)

CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES

Compulsory Arbitration

HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT

Policy Wording. Directors and Officers Liability and Company Reimbursement. Issued to Eligible Emergency Resource Providers by VMIA

Chapter II The Moratorium on Debt Repayment Section 1. Granting of Deferment of Payment and its Consequences

CITY OF NEWPORT, OREGON PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT

Chapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

NEW YORK FALSE CLAIMS ACT

TRIBAL COURT CODE CHAPTER 93 WORKERS COMPENSATION No Waiver of Sovereign Immunity or Application of State Law.

Page 291 TITLE 31 MONEY AND FINANCE 3730

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

CITY ADMINISTRATOR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

Claims for Compensation. PTO Approach 2. Claims the PTO may consider. Claims the PTO will not consider DECEMBER 2013

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/29/15 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSIOURI EASTERN DIVISION

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 1996 SESSION

Chapter VI Court Costs of Indigent Persons Fund. Assigned Counsel Manual Table of Contents CPCS Home Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Services Agreement Instruction Sheet

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

CHAPTER 234 HOUSE BILL 2131 AN ACT AMENDING SECTIONS , AND , ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO TAX ADJUDICATIONS.

Transcription:

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS CHAPTER 2: GUIDELINES FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, CIVIL PENALTIES, AND ATTORNEY S FEES UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 1977 4 DCMR 200 et seq. (1999) 200 PURPOSE 200.1 This chapter establishes the substantive and procedural requirements for awards of compensatory damages, civil penalties, and attorney s fees pursuant to 2-1403, 13(a) (1) of the D.C. Code, 2001 Ed. 200.2 It is the intent of the Commission in promulgating these guidelines to insure payment to persons aggrieved by unlawful discrimination of all expenses and damages fairly and reasonably attributable to unlawful discriminatory acts or practices. 200.3 The damages for which an award may be made shall include all of the damages enumerated herein, if proved, but shall not be limited thereto; it being the Commission s intent to award damages of any nature whatever which can be fairly proved to have resulted from acts of discrimination. 201 LOST INCOME AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 201.1 Every prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to all income that would have been received from an employer or any other source of income, whether or not that employer or source of income is a respondent hereunder, absent the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent during the period of violation. 201.2 Included therein shall be income for overtime work that have been available to the complainant under normal work conditions and work routine, on an estimated basis, during the period of violation. 201.3 This category shall also include the monetary equivalent of all sick leave, annual

leave, retirement benefits, annuities, health benefits, and every other normal and usual employee benefit lost during the period of violation as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent. 201.4 Any determination of damages for lost income shall be reduced by all other income received by the prevailing complainant from alternative employment during the period of violation. 202 EXCESSS HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL SPACE COSTS 202.1 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required, in order to satisfy his or her housing or commercial space needs, to pay rent in excess of that which he or she would have paid but for the unlawful discrimination, and upon proof of being so required, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to the amount actually paid in excess over the rent for a comparable space during the period of violation, or during the period for which the prevailing complainant was obligated by lease to pay rent to a third party, whichever is greater; provided that if the lease period exceeds the period of violation by more than two (2) years from the end of the period of violation. 202.2 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant suffered a demonstrable loss of income as a result of delays occasioned in the obtaining of commercial space in which to conduct his or her business, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to such lost income as can be reasonably proved. 202.3 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required to pay a purchase price for housing or commercial property in excess of prices contemporaneously paid for similar housing or commercial property in the same or similar area or neighborhood by persons not unlawfully discriminated against, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to the excess price actually paid. 202.4 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was prohibited from making an offer to purchase housing or commercial property, or if an offer of the prevailing complainant to purchase housing or commercial property was rejected for an equal or lower offer from another purchaser; the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to the difference between his or her actual or intended offer and the actual sales price of the housing or commercial property to the purchaser. 202.5 If the housing or commercial property for which the prevailing complainant intended to make an offer, or for which his or her offer was unlawfully rejected,

is not eventually sold; or if the eventual sales price is equal to above his or her offer; the complainant shall not be entitled to damages unless he or she was required to pay more than his or her original or intended offer for similar housing or commercial property, in which event he or she shall be entitled to damages equal to the excess of the amount paid for similar housing or commercial property over the original or intended offer. 202.6 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant or his or her family or his or her business were required to move or store all of part of his, her or his personal property, or to secure temporary quarters for his or her family, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to reimbursement of such moving or storage expenses or expenses for such temporary quarters. 203. DENIAL OF FULL ENJOYMENT OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS 203.1 If the prevailing complainant or his or her family were denied the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation in violation of 2-1402.31 of the D.C. Code, 2001 Ed; he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement the of all expenses and compensation for all damages resulting from the unlawful discrimination including, but not limited to, the following provisions: 203.2 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required to pay prices or charges for the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation in excess of those prices or charges normally levied by the place of public accommodation, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to the excess prices or charges actually paid. 203.3 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was denied the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, and he or she thereby lost an expected financial benefit or was otherwise hindered or damaged in his or her trade or occupation, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages in compensation for such losses. 203.4 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant or his or her family was denied the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, and he or she or his or her family was inconvenienced thereby, whether through the necessity of seeking other non-discriminating places or public accommodation or otherwise, the

prevailing complainant shall be entitled to such damages as are proved by competent evidence as defined in 213. 204 DENIAL OF USE OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS 204.1 If the prevailing complainant was denied or restricted in his or her use of or access to the facilities and services of an educational institution in violation of 2-1402.41 of the D.C. Code, 2001 Ed., he or she shall be entitled to reimbursementof all expenses and compensation for all damages resulting from the unlawful discrimination, including, but not limited to, the damages specified in 204.2 and 204.3. 204.2 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required to pay prices or charges for the use of or access to any facility or service of an educational institution in excess of those charges normally levied by the educational institution, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to damages equal to the excess prices or charges actually paid. 204.3 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was denied or restricted in his or her use of or access to any facility or service of an educational institution whether through the necessity of seeking other nondiscrimination educational institutions or otherwise, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to such damages as are proved by competent evidence as defined in 213. 205 DAMAGES RESULTING FROM MEDICAL DISABILITY 205.1 If the prevailing complainant suffered any physiological, psychological, or emotional problems as a result of the violation of the Human Rights Act of 1977 and incurred expenses or damages therefrom, he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement of such expenses or compensation for such damages based on competent medical evidence thereof, including, but not limited to, the damages specified in this section. 205.2 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant incurred any medical or hospital expenses, including, but not limited to, hospitalization, examination, or psychiatric services, he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement of such expenses. 205.3 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant suffered any physiological, psychological, or emotional problems, and as a result of such problems, suffered consequential damages such as lost employment, he or she shall be entitled to compensation for such damages.

206 TRAVEL EXPENSES 206.1 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required to incur travel expenses between his or her residence and his or her place of employment during the period of violation in excess of travel expenses that would have been incurred absent the unlawful discrimination, he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement of such excess expenses. 206.2 If the daily additional travel required was ten (10) miles or more, or if the total additional travel required was one hundred (100) miles or more, the complainant shall be entitled to compensation for the use of his or her automobile at the Government of the District of Columbia prevailing rate for reimbursement or mileage. 206.3 Double recovery of such expense shall not be allowed. 206.4 If the prevailing complainant has already been reimbursed for such excess travel expenses from another source, he or she shall not be entitled to such compensation. 207 REASONABLE EXPENSES INCURRED AS A RESULT OF PURSUING REMEDIES UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 1977 207.1 If, as a result of the prevailing complainant s efforts to obtain relief before the Commission, including reimbursement for expenses incurred at the investigative stage prior to the certification of the complaint to the Commission, lost income or other compensation, incurred travel expenses including parking expenses, or incurred excess expenses for food or lodging, the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to reimbursement of such expenses. 207.2 The prevailing complainant shall be entitled to reimbursement of all reasonable costs of prosecuting his or her claim for relief, including, but not limited to, filing fees; witness fees (including expert witness fees); photocopying, transportation of self, witnesses, or representatives to and from hearings; telephone expenses; and postages fees. 208 EXCESS EXPENSE RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT 208.1 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent,

the prevailing complainant was denied employment and necessarily incurred expenses in order to secure other employment, including, but not limited to employment agency fees, training fees, certification fees, and the cost of uniforms or other equipment necessitated by the other employment, he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement for such expenses. 208.2 If the prevailing complainant was denied employment and thereafter permanently lost the benefit of expenses incurred in anticipation of gaining said employment, he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement for such expenses, including, but not limited to, employment agency fees, training fees, certification fees, and the cost of uniforms or other equipment necessary for the employment. 209 PROPERTY DAMAGE 209.1 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant s property was damaged, or the complainant was forced to take action which resulted in damage to his or her property; he or she shall be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses actually incurred in repairing the damage or in replacing the property, if such replacement is found by the Commission to be necessary. 210 MENTAL AND PHYSICAL ANGUISH, PAIN AND SUFFERING 210.1 If, as a result of the unlawful discriminatory acts of practices of the respondent, the prevailing complainant was required to undergo medical or psychiatric treatment, or, where no medical treatment was undergone, there exists evidence of anguish, pain and suffering (e.g., headache, nausea, nervousness, insomnia, irritability, loss of weight), he or she shall be entitled to damages proved by competent medical evidence thereof, as defined in 213, in addition to any actual costs for medical attention as defined in 205. 211 EMBARRASSMENT, HUMILIATION, AND INDIGNITY 211.1 The natural and unavoidable consequences of any unlawful discriminatory act or practice are personal embarrassment, humiliation, and indignity, and the prevailing complainant shall be entitled to such damages as are proved by competent evidence as defined in 213. 211.2 In awarding damages for embarrassment, humiliation, or indignity; the Commission shall consider whether the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices were accompanied by aggravating factors including but not limited to any of the following:

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Untrue derogatory statements by the respondent regarding the complainant; Demotion or termination of the complainant; Racial, ethnic, religious, sexual, or other epithets regarding the complainant; Occurrence of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent publicly, or within the knowledge of the awardee s family, friends, peers, or acquaintances; and Willfulness, recklessness, or repetition of the unlawful discriminatory acts or practices of the respondent to the extent that they constituted harassment or caused unusual inconvenience. 212 CIVIL PENALTIES 212.1 If, as a result of an unlawful discriminatory act or practice of the respondent, the Commission finds that the respondent engaged in outrageous conduct, the respondent shall be assessed with civil penalties. 212.2 In determining whether the respondent engaged in outrageous conduct, the Commission shall consider whether the conduct was the result of: (a) (b) an evil or intentional act or practice, or reckless or callous indifference tot the rights of the complainant. 212.3 An evil or intentional act or practice is conduct reflecting a malicious, wanton, fraudulent or willfull intent, violence or oppression. 212.4 Reckless or callous indifference is conduct reflecting a conscious indifference to the rights of complainant for which respondent is or should be aware. 212.5 Absent direct proof, the requisite intent may be inferred from all of the surrounding facts and circumstances. 212.6 Civil penalties shall be assessed in accordance with the following schedule: (a) (b) An amount not to exceed $10,000 if the respondent has not been adjudged by the Commission to have committed any prior violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977. An amount not to exceed $25,000 if the respondent has been adjudged by

the Commission to have committed during the five (5) year period ending on the date of the filing of the current complaint one (1) other violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977. (c) An amount not to exceed $50,000 if the respondent has been adjudged to have committed during the seven (7) year period ending on the date of the filing of the current complaint two (2) or more violations of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977. 212.7 The payment of civil penalties shall be deposited into the District of Columbia General Fund and not be paid to the individual complainant. 213 ATTORNEY S FEES 213.1 If the prevailing complainant was represented by a privately retained attorney in any case in which the Commission has found that the respondent engaged in discriminatory acts of practices in violation of the Human Rights Act of 1977, the complainant shall be entitled to a reasonable attorney s fee for the number of hours reasonably expended by the complainant s attorney on claims upon which the complainant prevailed. 213.2 The reasonable hourly rate multiplied by the reasonable number of hours expended upon successful claims is presumed to be the reasonable attorney s fee. 213.3 In determining a reasonable hourly rate, the Commission shall consider the hourly rate, the Commission may also consider rates charged in the community for similar legal work by attorneys of comparable skill, experience, and reputation. 213.4 The prevailing complainant shall bear the burden of demonstrating that an upward adjustment of the presumed reasonable attorney s fee is necessary to provide fair compensation to the prevailing attorney. 213.5 The unsuccessful respondent shall bear the burden of demonstrating that a downward adjustment of the presumed reasonable attorney s fee is necessary to avoid a windfall to the prevailing attorney. 213.6 In determining whether an adjustment of the presumed reasonable attorney s fee is warranted, the Commission shall be guided by Supreme Court decisions interpreting the attorney s fee provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 1988 (1982); and other similar federal fee-shifting laws. 213.7 The complainant s attorney s fee petition shall be filed with the Commission no earlier than twenty (20) days after the issuance of the Commission s Final Decision and Order and no later than thirty (30) days after the issuance of the Commission s Final Decision and Order is appeal to the District of Columbia

Court of Appeals. 213.8 If a motion for reconsideration is filed, then the complainant shall file his or her attorney s fee petition no earlier than twenty (20) days after the issuance of the Commission s Final Decision and Order on Motion for Reconsideration and no later than (30) days after the issuance of the Commission s Final Decision and Order for Reconsideration. Supplemental petitions may be filed as in accordance with 213.7. 214 MISCELLANEOUS 214.1 An award of compensatory damages, civil penalties or attorneys fees pursuant to these guidelines shall be made only upon written petition of the prevailing complainant, specifying the type and amount of damages claimed. Such petition may be contained in the complainant s pre-hearing statement as outlined in the Commission s Rules of Procedure for Contested Cases, 4 DCMR 413.3. 214.2 Any award made for expenses compensable under 202, 203, 204, 205, and 206 of this guidelines shall be made only upon the production of documentary evidence of such expenses, including, but not limited to bills, receipts, canceled checks, and invoices. 214.3 If such documentation cannot reasonably be produced, an award may be made upon reasonable and credible testimony and evidence. 214.4 Any award of damages or other compensation under 201, 202, 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, and 213 of these guidelines shall be made only upon reliable and probative evidence that will permit the Commission to ascertain a reasonable basis for assessing the amount of the damages or other compensation. 214.5 If and award of damages is made, the respondent shall pay the complainant interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum on out of pocket expenses, from the date incurred to the date of payment, and if the total award is not paid within thirty (30) days from the date of issuance of the Commission s Final Decision and Order, the respondent shall pay interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum until paid.

299 DEFINITIONS 299.1 In addition to the definitions contained in 499 of the District of Columbia Commission on Human Rights Rules of Procedure for Contested Cases, 4 DCMR, chapter 4, the following terms and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed: Damages A monetary award made to a prevailing complainant and assessed against a respondent to compensate for injuries sustained as a result of discriminatory acts or practices found by the Commission to be unlawful under the Human Rights Act of 1977. Civil Penalties A monetary penalty assessed against the respondent which is paid into the District of Columbia General Fund as a result of the Commission s finding that the respondent s discriminatory acts or practices violated the Human Rights of 1977 and those acts or practices are found to be one of the acts enumerated under 212 of these guidelines. Period of Violation The period of time between the initial instance of the respondent s unlawful discrimination against the complainant as determined by the Commission and the date upon which the respondent ceases the discriminatory practice and offers remedy and relief in accordance with this chapter pursuant to an order issued by the Commission under 2-1403.13 of the D.C. Code, 2001 Ed.