The tax audit environment has changed

Oct.-Nov. 2014 Pilla Talks Taxes Dan Pilla s Monthly Tax and Financial Bulletin Vol. E3 Issue 52 MY NEW BOOK IS GETTING CLOSER! Here s Your Chance to Order Now The tax audit environment has changed considerably in the past ten years. That s why I ve been working hard on a new book that talks about audit defense strategy in the modern world. The book is called, How to Win Your Tax Audit: An Insider s Guide to Successfully Negotiating with the IRS. What follows here is an excerpt from the book, which deals with appealing tax audit decisions. This except is taken from chapter 13, entitled Appealing Tax Audit Decisions. What you see here is just a small taste of the mountain of hard, timely and effective information you ll get from How to Win Your Tax Audit. This is vital information every taxpayer and tax pro needs to know. CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions The IRS s mission is to collect the proper amount of taxes at the least cost to the federal government and taxpayers. However, due to the complexity of the tax law and the conflicting incentives that IRS employees face in administering the law, it is impossible to determine the proper amount of tax that should be collected United States Government Accountability Office September 1994 Contents MY NEW BOOK IS GETTING CLOSER! Here s Your Chance to Order Now...1 CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions...1-5 YEAR-END TAX PLANNING Nine Simple Steps to Cut Taxes and Avoid Pain...5-8 ORDER DAN PILLA S NEW BOOK NOW!...6 A NOTE FROM DAN PILLA...8 CAN IRS LEVY 100% OF A TAXPAYER S SOCIAL SECURITY? by Paul R. Tom, at Law...9-10 Dan Pilla probably knows more about the IRS than the commissioner of the IRS. Associated Press.

CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions, Cont. If the above statement were compelling in 1994 when published (and it certainly was), than it must be even more compelling today. Following the publication of that statement, there were three major tax reform acts during the three years from 1996 through 1998 that changed more than 750 code sections. The string was capped by the massive IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. Most people cannot even name the three acts, never mind any of the specific changes brought about by any one of those acts. But Congress was just getting warmed up when it came to changing the law. According to the National Taxpayer Advocate s 2012 Annual Report to Congress, during the period from 2001 to December 2012 (the date of that report), there were more than 4,680 changes to the tax code, an average of more than one a day. Ibid, pg 6. The frequency of tax law changes, coupled with the scope and complexity of the tax code, inflicts significant, even unconscionable, burden on taxpayers Ibid, pg 4. This is why it is impossible for the IRS to determine the correct tax owed and one key reason why auditors so often make mistakes in the audit process. This is also why it is critical to understand that a tax auditor s decision is never final. Too many people believe it is and end up paying taxes they do not owe. The IRS s Appeals Office reviews audit decisions. The Appeals Office is separate from other enforcement functions, such as Examination and Collection. The express function of Appeals is to negotiate settlements with citizens who disagree with the decisions of enforcement officers, such as tax auditors. In chapter 4 we learned that in 2013, 91 percent of all face-to-face audits resulted in a tax debt. The average tax debt thus generated was about $16,000. However, historically, only about 3 percent of people audited ever appeal their case. This testifies to the degree to which the IRS has people convinced they cannot win when challenging an audit decision. In fact, as the National Taxpayer Advocate pointed out in her 2013 Annual Report, most people do not even know what their rights are when it comes to challenging the IRS. Ironically, on appeal, well over 80 percent of all cases are settled satisfactorily each year. The magnitude of errors committed by the Exam function is shocking, even to me. In one report on Appeals Office casework, the GAO tracked the changes made by Appeals to audits that taxpayers challenged. The GAO examined tax disputes involving fourteen of the most common code sections. Among them are sections 61, 162, 167 and 311, each of which I explain below. The GAO s independent report forms the basis of the claim that I have made for years that IRS auditors are wrong 60-90 percent of the time in the audit decisions they make. Code section 61 defines gross income. It is the touchstone from which all income tax assessments flow. If an item is not considered income, it is not taxed. When the IRS makes a claim of unreported income, it cites code section 61 for its authority. According to the GAO, Appeals cut Examination s claims of unreported income by about 57 percent more than fifty cents of every dollar when citizens appealed. Unfortunately, the vast majority of citizens do not appeal. GAO, Recurring Tax Issues Tracked by IRS Office of Appeals, GAO/GGD-93-101, May 1993, pg 17. I explained code section 162 in the previous chapter. It allows a deduction to businesses for all expenses incurred in earning income. If the expense is ordinary and necessary, it is allowed. According to the GAO, the Appeals Office reversed 71 percent of the business expense disallowances issued by Examination. Ibid, pg 15. The depreciation expense deduction under code section 167 is another recurring issue tracked by the GAO. According to the report, the Appeals Office reversed audit decisions in this area by a factor of more than 99 percent! Ibid, pg 19. Still another recurring issue arises under code section 311, relating to the taxability of corporate distributions to shareholders. The Appeals Office reduced 100 percent of those adjustments. Ibid, pg 31. Let me reemphasize that these cuts occurred only for those who appealed their audit decision. The majority of citizens do not appeal. These facts should make it clear to even the most casual observer why so many people reach amicable settlements with Appeals whereas they cannot with Examination. What can possibly account for this wild spread in the results between the two functions? For starters, never lose sight of the main purpose of the Examination function. As stated by the GAO, the main purpose of Exam is to protect the government s revenue. GOA/GGD-94-70, September 1994, pg 4. Said another way, the job of tax auditors is to get the money. On the other hand, the function of the Appeals Office is much different. As the GAO states, the key function of Appeals is to resolve tax controversies without litigation to the extent possible while being fair and impartial to both the government and the taxpayer. Ibid. This attitude is best expressed by the language of Revenue Regulation section 601.106(f), which sets forth the rules of procedure for Appeals Officers. Rule I states: An exaction by the U.S. Government, which is not based upon law, statutory or otherwise, is a taking of property without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Accordingly, an Appeals representative in his or her conclusions of fact or application of the law, shall hew to the law and the recognized standards of legal construction. It shall be his or her duty to determine the correct amount of the tax, with strict impartiality as between the taxpayer and the Government, and without favoritism or discrimination as Pilla Talks Taxes page 2

CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions, Cont. between taxpayers. Regulation section 601.106(f)(1), Rule I (Emphasis added.) As you can plainly see, Appeals Officers are under strict regulatory authority regarding the settlement of cases. They must not be driven by the desire to simply get the money. Rather, their function is to determine the actual facts of the case and correctly apply the law to those facts. This process usually leads to a correct determination, not a falsely inflated one designed only to fill the Treasury s coffers. For this reason, I often say that the purpose of the Examination function is to cause problems with citizens, while the purpose of Appeals is to solve them. Which one would you rather deal with? Too often, citizens fail to appeal because they believe it will only make matters worse. They believe an Appeals Officer might reopen issues previously accepted or not reviewed by the auditor, or worse, will start an audit for another tax year. However, Revenue Regulation section 601.106(d)(1) stipulates that while the case is under consideration, the Appeals Officer is not to either reopen an issue agreed on at the audit level or to raise a new issue. Moreover, IRS Policy Statement 8-2 expressly states: Appeals will not raise new issues. IRM sec. 1.2.17.1.2. And the Policy Statement further provides that Appeals will not reopen an issue on which the taxpayer and the Service are in agreement. Ibid. Thus, any concerns about making matters worse are simply unfounded. The fact is you are always better offer appealing a tax audit decision than agreeing to it. This of course assumes that the decision is not 100 percent accurate, which in my experience, is always true. How to Appeal In any tax audit case, you enjoy the absolute right to appeal an unagreed case. Revenue Regulation section 601.103(c)(1). You file an appeal by submitting a timely protest letter. While not all cases require that the protest be in writing, I submit that it is always best to make your request in writing, for two reasons. First, the procedure is very simple and requires very little effort. And second, it eliminates the potential for miscommunication. The time for making the appeal is set by Revenue Regulation section 601.105(d)(1)(iv). It provides that when an examination is complete, the revenue agent must communicate his findings to the citizen in the form of a revenue agent s report (RAR). The worksheets presented with the RAR state the basis of the proposed adjustments. The RAR must be accompanied by a thirty-day letter. The regulation describes the thirty-day letter as a form letter which states the determination proposed to be made. Ibid; emphasis added. The form letter is usually IRS Letter 950. Notice that the thirty-day letter is not a final assessment. Tax Freedom Institute Consulting Members Name Donald MacPherson Scott MacPherson Dana Ronald Lawrence Stephens Julius Janusz Steven Klitzner Darrin Mish Thomas Buck Glenn Miller Patricia Gentile Thomas Quade Chris Churchwell Chris Ratcliff Gary Gilliland Dana Ronald Ed Zelazo Paul Tom Mitchell Gerstein Terry Griffith Kenneth Eichner Marc Enzi Judy Johnson Frank Rooney Ability Level, Accountant Territory (City located) AZ (Glendale) CA (Redondo Beach) CA SW (Orange Cty) CA:Northern (Modesto) CT (New Britain) FL (Miami ) FL (Tampa) IA (Schaller) IL (Loves Park) MA (Chelmsford) MN (Roseville) MO (Joplin) MO (St Louis) NC (Greenville) NV (Las Vegas) NH, ME,VT (Dover NH) OK (Tulsa) PA (Blue Bell) TN (Memphis) & MS TX (Houston) TX (Houston) TX (Midland) VA (Arlington), MD & DC Phone 800-BEAT IRS 800-BEAT IRS (714) 794-4680 (209) 543-0490 (860) 225-2867 (800) 219-1118 (813) 229-7100 (888) 364-4496 (815) 282-0411 (978) 454-1145 (651) 481-7933 (417) 623-2505 (314) 570-1299 (252) 355-0605 (702) 217-0660 (603) 749-4434 (918) 743-2000 (267) 419-1622 (662) 470-4132 (713) 781-8892 (832) 391-3600 (432) 687-1175 (703) 527-2660 Email mac@beatirs.com scott@beatirs.com Dana@taxcrisisinstitute.com lhs@saccon.com tax@jjtax.com ocaydoke1@aol.com dmishesq@getirshelp.com tom@buckcpa.com glenncpafish@aol.com PGentile@comcast.net tjjq@comcast.net cdchurchwell@mcmcpapc.com ratclifflaw@att.net garygtfi@use-email.net Dana@taxcrisisinstitute.com epzjr@aol.com paultom@tax-amnesty.com mitch.gerstein@cliftonlarsonallen.com terry@griffithfirm.com kde@kdepc.com marc.enzi@taxss.com jj851@apex2000.net rooneyf@irsequalizer.com Pilla Talks Taxes page 3

CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions, Cont. Rather, that letter is merely the process of communicating the reasons why the agent believes you owe more tax. The thirty-day letter must also inform you of appeal rights available if [you] disagre[e] with the proposed determination. Ibid. The thirty-day letter asks you to agree with the auditor s findings and sign the waiver included. The waiver is Form 870, Waiver of Restrictions on Assessment and Collection and Acceptance of Overassessment. You have no legal obligation to sign it and the IRS cannot punish you if you refuse. If you do sign it, the IRS assesses the tax and proceeds with collection. Your right of appeal is not lost, but the manner of prosecuting it is significantly altered and generally requires that you first pay the tax in full. This option is simply not practical for most people. If you disagree with all or part of the proposal, you are usually presented with three options. The first is to submit additional information relevant to the agent s findings. If you have additional data that has not been presented, now is the time to do so. The second option is to request a meeting with the agent s supervisor. This too can be helpful and should be considered. Note, however, that in most cases, an agent s manager has already reviewed a thirty-day letter before it was issued. It is not likely that you will achieve measurable results by meeting with a manager. The final choice is to submit a protest letter asking for an appeal. If you have exhausted all possible remedies at the Examination level, this is the course to pursue. You have thirty days from the date of Letter 950 in which to submit your written protest. Drafting the protest letter is simple. The first step in the process is to identify the specific issues in question. To do this, carefully review two IRS forms that are provided as part of the RAR. The first is Form 4549, Income Tax Discrepancy Adjustments. This is a two-page form that shows you exactly what the IRS did to compute the additional tax. Items shown on line 1 of that form are the adjustments to taxable income as computed by the agent. Any income added to your return and any disallowed deductions are identified in line 1 along with the amount of the adjustment. For example, if the agent disallowed $5,000 of mortgage interest deductions, the notation on line 1 will say something like mortgage interest and the corresponding dollar amount shown in the adjacent column will be $5,000. Income adjustments are shown in various ways, depending upon the situation. If you are self-employed, the adjustment will be shown as Schedule C gross receipts. If you are a farmer, the adjustment will be shown as Schedule F gross receipts. If the income comes from alleged unreported interest or capital gains, the entry on line 1 will so state. There may be one or more adjustments shown on line 1. In each case, a few words will identify exactly what was adjusted and the amount. Line 4 shows the corrected taxable income per the auditor s adjustments. Line 16 shows the amount of tax you owe as a result of the adjustments. Line 17 identifies what if any penalties were added and the amounts. And line 19 itemizes the total owed, including penalties (from line 17) and interest. Line 19e gives the total amount owed. The second form to review is Form 886-A, Explanation of Items. This form provides the agent s reasoning behind all of the adjustments. If the adjustment was to add alleged unreported income, Form 886-A explains the basis (such as it exists) for the decision. Likewise, the reasoning behind any disallowed deduction is stated on an item-by-item basis. In the case of disallowed charitable contribution deductions, for example, the explanation may be something like, Taxpayer failed to provide sufficient proof of charitable contributions. By reviewing these two forms carefully, you will know exactly what the examiner did and why he did it. This gives you the tools you need to craft a proper protest letter. Your protest letter should be set up in letterhead fashion, with your name, address, social security number, phone number and the date at the top. It should be addressed to the person to contact identified on the thirty-day letter you received. That person is generally the auditor who handled your case. Your letter should be laid out in paragraph format, with each separate paragraph corresponding to the following items: 1. A statement that you want to appeal the examination findings to the Appeals Office. This should be a one-line statement, in bold letters, centered across the page under the name and address of the agent to whom the letter is addressed; 2. The date and symbols from the thirty-day letter showing the proposed changes. The symbols come from the lower-right margin of the thirty-day letter. As stated above, the typical thirtyday letter carries the designation Letter 950. The date is found at the top of the letter; 3. The tax periods involved. These are shown on Form 4549, under the heading Period Ended, which is found on line 1 of the form; 4. An itemized schedule of the changes with which you disagree. After carefully reviewing Forms 4549 and 886-A you will be able to see what the agent did and therefore decide exactly what you disagree with. You cannot simply say, I disagree with the report. Rather, you might say, I disagree with the decision to disallow my mortgage interest deduction. If there are several issues at stake, you can say, I disagree with the following adjustments: and list each one separately. If you agree with one or more adjustments, simply do not include any reference to them in your protest letter; 5. A statement of facts supporting your position on any issue with which you disagree. This statement must be sufficient to show the Appeals Office the basis of your case. This statement need not be extensive or elaborate, as you will have a separate opportunity to present detailed facts and evidence to support your position. The statement need only be sufficient to show the Appeals Office your Pilla Talks Taxes page 4

CHAPTER 13 Appealing Tax Audit Decisions, Cont. factual basis for challenging the agent s decision. 6. A statement of the law or other authority on which you rely. Likewise, this does not have to be an extensive analysis of tax law. In most cases, simply referring to the relevant tax code section is sufficient. For example, if the IRS disallowed certain business expenses, you might cite code section 162 to support your claim that the tax code allows the expenses. If you are unsure which code section supports your deductions, refer to the IRS publication that addresses your issue. For example, in the case of mortgage interest, Publication 17, Your Income Tax, has a chapter that addresses the deduction for mortgage interest. You can cite to Pub 17 as your authority. While it is true that IRS publications are not law, they are sufficient authority for purposes of your protest letter. You can search the IRS s web site for references to all of its publications. For more information on the appeals process, see IRS Publication 5, Appeal Rights and Preparation of Protests for Unagreed Cases and Publication 4227, Appeals. Your protest letter must have a perjury clause above your signature. This clause states that the facts presented under paragraph 5 are true under penalties of perjury. Your perjury clause should read as follows: Under the penalties of perjury, I declare that the facts presented in this protest letter are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, correct and complete. Without such a declaration, your protest is considered inadequate. Your signature must appear below the perjury clause. Your protest letter is now complete and ready to go. You do not have to provide any documents or other proof with the letter. That will come later, during your conference with an Appeals Officer. Mail the letter via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person to contact identified in the thirty-day letter. Be sure to keep a signed copy of the letter and be sure to keep the postal receipts for certified mail showing when and where you mailed the letter. YEAR-END TAX PLANNING Nine Simple Steps to Cut Taxes and Avoid Pain With the end of the year fast approaching, you re probably wondering what you can do to cut your taxes. Remember: if you wait until April to start thinking about this, it s just too late. Here are some ideas to get you moving in the right direction now. 1. Pay state income taxes before December 31. Many people wait until April 15 to pay their state income taxes, since that s when they file their state tax returns. However, if you pay your state income taxes in 2015, you can t claim the deduction for those taxes until you file your 2015 income tax return. That doesn t happen until April 2016. Thus, you have to wait an entire year before getting the tax benefit of the expense. By paying your state taxes now, you get a deduction for those taxes in 2014. That means you get the benefit of the expense more than one year sooner than you d otherwise realize. For 2014, you have the option to claim a deduction for either the state income tax or you may claim the general sales tax deduction, whichever is higher. For those who live in a state with no income tax (such as Florida, Texas or South Dakota), you should claim the general sales tax deduction. There are two ways you can claim the deduction. The first is to use the tables provided by the IRS. See IRS Publication 600, State and Local General Sales Taxes. The tables calculate the deduction based on the state you live in, your gross income and the number of dependent exemptions you re entitled to. The second way is to claim the actual sales tax paid by accumulating all your receipts. While this is obviously more tedious, it might pay off in a big way if you purchased one or more big-ticket items during the year. For example, if you bought a new vehicle or made substantial improvements to your home, these items might push you over the standard deduction allowed by the tables. But the key is to have the records to prove the deduction and you should start now getting them organized. 2. Review your wage withholding or estimated payments. Eighty-five percent of all taxpayers get a tax refund when they file their tax returns. The average refund is now more than $3,000. If you get a tax refund, it doesn t mean the government got religion and decided to give you free money. It means you paid more taxes than you owe. If you got a refund in 2014 for your 2013 taxes, you need to examine your withholding situation going into 2015 to make sure you don t overpay. Whether you re an employee subject to wage withholding or you make estimated tax payments as a self-employed person, sit down now and do some preliminary calculations on your tax liability. Figure out if you ve overpaid. If so, you need to adjust Form W-4 (for wage earners) or your estimated tax payment pattern (for self-employed persons). Keep in mind that no law requires you to pay more taxes than you owe. For withholding purposes, you avoid under-withholding penalties if you pay either 100 percent of last year s tax (2013) or 90 percent of this year s tax (2014), whichever is less. Use that yardstick to guide you in adjusting your withholding. Pilla Talks Taxes page 5

ORDER DAN PILLA S NEW BOOK NOW! HOW TO WIN YOUR TAX AUDIT An Insider s Guide to Successfully Negotiating with the IRS ORDER YOUR COPY NOW AT THIS SPECIAL PRE-PUBLICATION PRICE BY CALLING: SPECIAL PRE-PUBLICATION OFFER Dan Pilla s new book How to Win Your Tax Audit will be released later this fall. This is your first opportunity to order the book at special pre-publication prices. Once the book is in print before the end of the year, you will not be able to order at this special rate. The normal retail price for this book is $29.95. Order now at this limited-time price, for just $19.95 plus 3.95 shipping. Order two copies now for the special price of just $39.95 and that includes shipping! In this powerful and informative book, you ll learn these insider tactics and strategies to guarantee that you ll NEVER FEAR THE IRS AGAIN! 7 Ways the IRS Attacks Your Tax Return and How to Counter How to Stop the IRS From Contacting Your Bank, Employer, Friends or Neighbors 10 Ways to Prove Deductions and Verify Income 15 IRS Bluffs and Intimidations and How to Counter 11 Essential Taxpayers Rights and How to Assert Them 11 Ground Rules to Establish Before Your Audit 14 Secrets to Effective Communication And much more! Plus, a special feature dealing with one of the fastest growing IRS problems, How to Prevent and Solve Identity Theft. 800-346-6829 OR GO TO WWW.TAXHELPONLINE.COM DON T WAIT. This offer won t be around long. Once the book is in print, you ll pay the full retail price.

YEAR-END TAX PLANNING Nine Simple Steps to Cut Taxes and Avoid Pain, Cont. 3. Count your money now. Each year, millions of people are blindsided come April 15 with surprise tax liabilities they don t have the capacity to pay. Don t wait until March or April to start figuring your tax, especially if 2014 was an unusual year somehow. It is important for you sit down now and examine your 2014 financial situation. If there were substantial changes to your economic condition in 2014, they may have the impact of increasing your tax burden. If you don t have the money to cover the tax, you could wind up as one of the millions of taxpayers facing enforced tax collection action. Unusual circumstances that might lead to a surprise tax liability include the following: A distribution from an IRA or 401(k), The receipt of unemployment compensation for which there was no withholding, The sale of appreciated business or investment property, The foreclosure on a home or other asset*, Settling a lawsuit, The forgiveness of credit card or other debt*, Sales of securities not included in a qualified retirement plan, The receipt of year-end bonuses for which there was no withholding, and The receipt of alimony due to a divorce during 2014. *If you faced either of these situations, you must read my book, How to Eliminate Taxes on Debt Forgiveness, to determine whether these events indeed create a tax liability in your case. This list is not exhaustive. There are a litany of factors that bear on whether you might end up with a tax debt beyond what you expected. The only way to know for sure is to carefully review your situation and in the process, get advice from an experienced tax pro. That way, you ll have a good handle on what you re going to owe. If you figure it out now, you have four and a half months to put together a plan to pay the tax. If you don t, you could be hit over the head in April. In my experience, it s that kind of shock that causes people to start making critical mistakes in how they handle their tax burdens. Often, it leads to years of hassle and harassment from the IRS. 4. Review your financial portfolio. One of the biggest problems with our tax system is the unfair treatment it affords to investment gains and losses. If you win with your investment, the IRS stands next to you with its hand out to get it s share of your success. If you lose, you are, for the most part, on your own. The reason is that capital gains are subject to tax in their entirety in the year they are realized. However, capital losses are subject to a $3,000 ceiling in a given year. That means if you lose $15,000 in an investment, you can only deduct $3,000 at a time. This means it takes you five years to fully write off your loss. This is true unless you have both capital gains and capital losses in the same year. If that s that case, you offset your gains against your losses, plus you can take an extra $3,000 of loss. Suppose you have $10,000 of capital gains and $12,000 of losses. In that case, the $10,000 of gains are offset against the first $10,000 of losses, and thus not taxed. Then, you get the additional $2,000 of losses as a deduction that offsets other income. In order to best utilize this rule, you might consider selling investments that are down in 2014 so that you can offset that loss against any investments that made money during 2014. This allows you to effectively increase the allowable capital loss deduction, thereby recovering your losses much faster than you otherwise would. 5. Consider making equipment purchases. If you own a small business, now is the time to consider purchasing any equipment you might need for your business. A special tax code section creates an advantage for business equipment. Code section 179 allows you to claim a full deduction for the cost of business tools and equipment placed in service in the year in question. Ordinarily, the cost of such equipment must be depreciated over the useful life of the equipment. For example, if you purchase a copier for $5,000, you would normally have to depreciate that copier over three years. In that case, you get a deduction of $1,667 for each of three years. But under section 179, you can fully expense up to $25,000 of equipment placed in service in 2014. This allows you to get the full benefit of the deduction in the year of the purchase, rather than having to spread the recovery over several years. The bad news is that this benefit was cut from $500,000 for prior years. $25,000 is the level the deduction was at prior to the Bush tax reform measures. This is just one of the tax breaks for the rich that the president eliminated. 6. Fund a Health Savings Account (HSA). One of the bestkept secrets in tax planning remains the Health Savings Account. This account allows you to set aside money that is earmarked to pay medical expenses not covered by insurance (other than the insurance policy itself). By placing the money in a specially designated savings account, the contribution to the account is tax deductible, up to certain limits. It works much like an IRA or 401(k), except that you don t have to pay taxes on the money when it s distributed, provided you use it for medical expenses that are not covered by insurance. You can fund this account right up to December 31, 2014, and get a deduction for the money you put in, even if it s not used for medical expenses in 2014. What s more, any amounts left in the account at the end of the year carryover to 2015 and remain in your account, under your control. You don t lose the money. It s always available to pay medical bills not covered by insurance. If you don t have an HSA, you need to look into getting one. Pilla Talks Taxes page 7

YEAR-END TAX PLANNING Nine Simple Steps to Cut Taxes and Avoid Pain, Cont. It is available for anybody who has a high-deductible health plan and is not covered by another health plan, such as an employer provided plan. 7. Fund a retirement account. An IRA, 401(k) or other retirement account can be funded anytime during 2014, and you ll get a deduction for the contribution (within limits) in 2014. In fact, for most retirement accounts, you have up to April 15 of the following year to contribute. You can get a deduction for the prior year simply by designating the contribution to apply to the prior year. That means a contribution made in 2015 can still apply to and be deductible in 2014. 8. Consider restructuring your business. There are millions of people operating small businesses in the form of sole proprietorships. And while this is probably the best way to start a new business, it may not be the best way to continue an existing business into the future. Various forms of business entities are available, including a small business corporation, partnership and LLC. Depending upon the nature of your business and your non-tax considerations, one or more of the available entities might be a better idea than continuing as a sole proprietorship. January 1 is generally the most convenient time to change the structure of an existing business but you should get help with this process. Talk to an experienced tax pro who can point out the advantages and disadvantages of each business structure. Also see my special report, entitled, Dan Pilla s Guide to Starting Your Own Business, available at no charge on my web site here: http://taxhelponline.com/resources-and-publications/ research-reports/guide-to-starting-a-business.html 9. Catch up on your charitable contributions. If you make it a practice to give generously, make another contribution before December 31. This gives you further opportunity to cut taxable income and help those in need around you at the same time. When making significant charitable contributions, note that you must have a contemporaneous acknowledgement from the donee organization if your contribution is for $250 or more. This applies to one-time contributions, not a total of contributions to a given organization over the span of one year. If you don t have the proper acknowledgement in hand by the time you file your tax return, the deduction is not allowed, even if you have your canceled check and even you get the statement later. That s why they call it a contemporaneous acknowledgement. Happy New Year and the best to you in 2015. A NOTE FROM DAN PILLA If you missed the 2014 Defense Conference in Las Vegas, you missed a tremendous conference. We had informative sessions on the Collection Due Process appeal and our live CDP role-playing presented eight different fact scenarios with eight different, experienced TFI members playing the roles of IRS settlement officers. It was great a tremendous learning experience for everyone. In fact, the response was so overwhelmingly positive that I made up my mind to include some role-playing in the 2015 Defense Conference. I m already thinking about how to incorporate different scenarios for next year. If you missed the conference, all is not lost. Right now, Jean is working on the CD set that you can purchase immediately. The CDs will include: All my live session presentations on CD, All the written handout material, and A quizzer. Complete and return the quizzer and get nine hours of CE credit from the IRS. Just call the TFI office at 800-346-6829 to order your set. What you will miss is the role-playing sessions and our debriefing session, but that s exactly why you have to make a commitment to attend the conference. Already the dates are set for the 2015 Defense Conference, so there s not excuse for missing it. Plan now and don t be left out of this dynamic and informative seminar. Dan Pilla Pilla Talks Taxes page 8

CAN IRS LEVY 100% OF A TAXPAYER S SOCIAL SECURITY? By Paul R. Tom, at Law I m sure everyone reading this article has experienced this: Client receives a notice from the IRS that it issued a levy to the Social Security Administration. The notice (either a CP91 or a CP298) states that IRS is authorized under IRC 6331(h) to levy up to 15% of client s Social Security benefit payments. The notice further states that your client can avoid the Social Security levy by: 1) full paying the liability within 30 days after the notice, or 2) contacting IRS and presenting income and expense information showing that the Social Security levy creates an undue financial hardship and should be released. At the recent November 2014 Taxpayers Defense Conference, a few of the tax professionals in attendance reported that they have represented clients who have had far more than 15% of their Social Security benefit payments levied. A couple of professionals even reported that IRS levied 100% of their client s Social Security benefit payments. OUCH! Everyone in attendance at the Conference agreed that a 100% Social Security levy is unfair, but we disagreed about whether it s legal. After all, IRC 6331(h) states: If the Secretary approves a levy under this subsection, the effect of such levy on specified payments to or received by a taxpayer shall be continuous from the date such levy is first made until such levy is released. Notwithstanding section 6334, such continuous levy shall attach to up to 15 percent of any specified payment due to the taxpayer. Social Security benefit payments do qualify as specified payments. Therefore, if the levy is approved under IRC 6331(h), isn t IRS limited to a levy of just 15% of the payment? There is no question that a 6331(h) Social Security levy is statutorily limited to 15%. So how can IRS legally levy more than 15% of my client s Social Security benefit payments? Section 6331(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, the general levy section, authorizes IRS to issue levies as follows: If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and such further sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property (except such property as is exempt under section 6334) belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary makes a finding that the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate payment of such tax may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, collection thereof by levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in this section. We ve all seen 6331(a) levies served on the taxpayer s bank. The levy is a one-time-hitter, meaning that on the date the levy is received by the bank, the bank will pay IRS the balance of the bank account or the entire tax balance due, whichever is less. Deposits made into the bank account on the day after the levy hits are not affected. A section 6331(a) levy is also issued to collect money in a brokerage account or an IRA and payments due to an independent contractor for work performed. When the taxpayer receives Social Security and owes federal taxes, IRS typically uses a 6331(h) levy to collect the tax, and limits its collection to 15%. But 6331(h) is not the only way IRS can collect against Social Security. Occasionally, IRS will levy Social Security pursuant to 6331(a), and if they do that, they are legally authorized to collect up to 100% of each and every Social Security payment until the entire tax debt, including penalties and interest, is paid in full. A 100% levy against Social Security is punitive, harsh, unfair, Draconian and, unfortunately, entirely legal! Several federal court cases have held that IRS is not statutorily limited to collecting only 15% of a taxpayer s Social Security payments. If the IRS levy issued pursuant to IRC 6331(a), it reaches 100% of each Social Security payment and continues until the entire assessed balance of tax penalty and interest is collected. In Hines v. United States, 658 F. Supp. 2d 139 (DDC 2009), Hines owed taxes for tax years 1996 through 2001 and 2003. IRS levied Hines income, including 100% of each of his monthly Social Security benefit payments. Hines sued IRS in the Washington D.C. federal court and alleged, among other things, that IRS was limited by IRC 6331(h) to collecting only 15% of his monthly Social Security payments. IRS answered Hines allegations, counterclaimed to reduce the tax assessment to a judgment, and quickly filed a motion for summary judgment on all outstanding issues. Pilla Talks Taxes page 9

CAN IRS LEVY 100% OF A TAXPAYER S SOCIAL SECURITY? by Paul R. Tom, at Law, Cont. In his response to IRS s Motion for Summary Judgment, Hines argued that IRS s levy on his Social Security benefits violated the 15% cap on continuous levies against specified payments imposed by IRC 6331(h). IRS countered Hines argument by stating that the levy it issued against Hines was not a continuous levy, and therefore it was not limited to 15% of each payment. In its opinion, the Court discussed the history of the continuous wage levy, the 15% limitation on 6331(h) levies, and the fact that IRS has the discretion whether to levy Social Security under 6331(h) subject to the 15% cap or under 6331(a) which is not subject to a cap. The Court also held that IRS has the authority under 6331(a) to levy 100% of both current and all future Social Security payments, because: Social Security benefits are vested in the taxpayer and create a current obligation for the United States; Social Security benefits are fixed because they are based on the beneficiary s average lifetime employment earnings; and Social Security benefits are determinable and can be calculated using the statutory benefits formula set forth in 42 USC 402 et seq. Having found that Hines Social Security payments are fixed and determinable obligations, the Court held that: The Social Security Administration s ongoing payment of a specific amount of retirement benefits to plaintiff every month therefore was an obligation existing at the time the levies attached under 26 U.S.C. 6331(b). After concluding that IRS was entitled to 100% of Hines Social Security, the Court pounded the final nail in Hines coffin by granting IRS summary judgment on its counterclaim reducing Hines tax assessment to a judgment. Tax judgments, unlike tax assessments, are not subject to the normal 10-year statute of limitations on collection. Judgments are subject to a 20-year collection statute. IRS frequently levies on Social Security benefits, but Social Security levies are almost always sought pursuant to IRC 6331(h) and limited to 15%. One hundred percent Social Security levies pursuant to IRC 6331(a) are rare. In fact, you may have represented taxpayers for many years and never seen one. But the fact that they are rare doesn t mean they are unlawful. Just ask Mr. Hines. Unfortunately, the answer to the title question of this article is Yes! Editor s Note: Paul Tom is a long-time member of the Tax Freedom Institute and frequent contributor to this newsletter. You can reach Paul as follows: Paul R. Tom 2727 E. 21 st Street, Suite 604 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 (918) 743-2000 paultom@tax-amnesty.com Pilla Talks Taxes is a monthly publication designed to enlighten the American public on matters tax law, procedure, philosophy, accounting and general financial issues. Subscription Rate: One Year/10 issues $99 Editorial and Subscription Offices: 215 W. Myrtle Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone: 651-439-1606 Fax: 651-439-3998 Publisher: Winning Publications, Inc. How You Can Ask Dan Pilla a Question If you have questions or problems you d like Dan Pilla to address, please write to Dan at: 215 W. Myrtle Street Stillwater, MN 55082 or e-mail to: denise@taxhelponline.com Write the word newsletter in the subject line. www.taxhelponline.com Editor/Feature Writer: Daniel J. Pilla Copyright (c) 2014 Winning Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Pilla Talks Taxes page 10