NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION



Similar documents
NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS

NOTICE OF APPROVED SETTLEMENTS IN ZUNGUI HAIXI CORPORATION SECURITIES CLASS ACTION READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS

ROUGE RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT FEE CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL

Summary of Proposed Settlement

PER SESSION PAY CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Superior Court of Cobb County, State of Georgia In re Cobb EMC Class Action, Case No. 10: NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE MATTER OF THE PHOENIX FINANCIAL CLASS ACTION LITIGATION NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS CLASS ACTION THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS; PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DOROTHY YOUNG SHELL CANADA LIMITED. Brought under the Class Proceedings Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.

ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT

TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET ADDRESS

All persons who: CLASS MEMBERS:

LCD CANADIAN PRICE-FIXING CLASS ACTION FAQ

CASH STORE SECURITIES LITIGATION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION OF IKO ORGANIC SHINGLES CLASS ACTION IN CANADA

PLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.

CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT. This contingency fee retainer agreement is. Tel: Fax: Toll Free:

THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL CANADIAN CLASS ACTION RE: UNPAID MECHANICAL AND VIDEO ROYALTIES AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

XL FOODS CLASS ACTION

Management liability - Employment practices liability Policy wording

ONTARIO COURT (GENERAL DIVISION)

SETTLEMENT DISCLOSURE NOTICE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING

Memorial Hermann Employer Occupational Accident Program Houston, Texas

Nortel Compensation Claims Process Webinar. September 22 and 30, 2011

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL IN THE MATTER OF METHIONINE CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

Errors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition

Frequently Asked Questions About the Honda Odometer Class Action Settlement

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

ARIZONA TITLE 12 - COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS, CHAPTER 20, STRUCTURED SETTLEMENTS, ARTICLE 1, GENERAL PROVISIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY

United Healthcare Corporation Class Action Litigation

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-BT-CTL

CAR ACCIDENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MICHAEL MOSEY. - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO (ONTARIO MINISTRY OF LABOUR) STATEMENT OF CLAIM

* DEC , '' \(I\

FILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

If You Lived at Huronia Regional Centre or are the Family Member of Someone Who Did

RE: ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.

RAYMOND MICHAEL TOTH. and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ORDER. UPON motion in writing made by the Plaintiff, Raymond Michael Toth, for an order

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

How To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns

CANADIAN LCD PRICE-FIXING CLASS ACTIONS NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL & CLAIMS PROCESS

Case 3:06-cv MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Independent Contractor Agreement (ICA)

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

ORDER WITH RESPECT TO DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT FUNDS AND RELATED MATTERS

RETAINER AGREEMENT: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md MJP. Lead Case No. C MJP

Case 3:11-cv RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Tax Information and Legal Matters

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing

Case 1:12-cv ADS-AKT Document 88-1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 56 of 64 PageID #: 1018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

NFL, RETIRED PLAYERS RESOLVE CONCUSSION LITIGATION; COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATOR HAILS HISTORIC AGREEMENT. Thousands of Retirees and Families to Benefit

You have been identified as a member of a Class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may affect your rights.

CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Edward Killough, Patricia Nicholson, Irene Fead, Daphne Martin, Deborah Lutz, and Melanie Crehan PLAINTIFFS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

(ONTARIO) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND CLAIMS PROCESS IN THE CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS CLASS ACTION LITIGATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ASHLAND DIVISION

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 106

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

St. Thomas University

GM Ignition Compensation Claims Resolution Facility FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Case 1:11-cv LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LIABILITY COVERAGE

FEATURE ARTICLES. Closing Adjustment Provisions in M&A Transactions: Avoiding Common Disputes

MARCH 9, Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to workers compensation.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1999 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 746

LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ALL PERSONS THAT PURCHASED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, YAHOO! PAY-PER-CLICK TEXT ADVERTISING IN THE U.S.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

A. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

FLORIDA WRONGFUL DEATH ACT

8:11-mn JMC Date Filed 04/22/15 Entry Number 150 Page 1 of 8

ERISA Causes of Action *

Transcription:

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Joseph Michael O Neill v. General Motors of Canada Limited Court File No. CV-10-40251500CP PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS THE COURT HAS APPROVED A SETTLEMENT IN THIS CASE THE MANNER IN WHICH CLASS MEMBERS WILL BE COMPENSATED IS DESCRIBED BELOW This Notice is published by order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice In May 2010 a class action was commenced against General Motors of Canada Limited ( GMCL ) on behalf of former salaried and executive employees who retired between January 1, 1995 and October 20, 2011. The class action concerns reductions that GMCL made to the retirement benefits of Class Members. The parties have reached an agreement to settle the class action. This settlement has been approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. This notice describes the settlement in greater detail, including who it applies to, the details of the settlement, and the process by which Class Members will be compensated. 1. WHO DOES THE SETTLEMENT APPLY TO? The settlement applies to all persons who are members of the class as described in the court order certifying this case as a class action. The class includes: a) all salaried and executive retirees of GMCL who retired from GMCL between January 1, 1995 and October 20, 2011, and b) all surviving spouses and dependent children beneficiaries of any deceased persons described in (a), 1 1 For greater clarity, this means: in respect of people described in paragraph (a) who died prior to October 20, 2011, all surviving spouses of such deceased people, and where there is no surviving spouse or where the surviving spouse died prior to October 20, 2011, all dependent children of such deceased people described in paragraph (a), in all cases such surviving spouses and dependents being persons eligible under GMCL s benefit plans without regard to the changes to eligibility requirements under GMCL s benefit plans effective January 1, 2009.

- 2 - The class does not include: i. former employees of Canadian Automotive Manufacturing Inc. ( CAMI ) who became employees of GMCL as a result of the amalgamation of CAMI and GMCL effective January 1, 2011; ii. retirees of divested units Electro-Motive Canada Co ( EMC, formerly London Diesel); General Dynamics Land Systems Canada Corporation ( GDLS, formerly GM Defense); Peregrine Oshawa Inc. (and its successor Automotive Component Systems of Canada, Inc ( ACSYS ); or Peregrine Windsor Inc. (and its successor Lear Corporation Canada Ltd.) where post-retirement benefits are not provided by GMCL; and iii. Any persons who opted-out of the class action by sending in an opt-out form post-marked on or before January 21, 2012. 2. WHAT IS THE CLASS ACTION ABOUT? The class action concerns changes that GMCL made to post-retirement benefits for its salaried and executive employees, which were announced beginning in late 2007. The changes included: reductions to health benefits, starting in 2008 for such things as drug costs, out-of province medical coverage, dental benefits, semi-private hospital coverage and longterm care costs; introduction of monthly health care insurance contributions; reductions to Basic Life Insurance benefits and Supplemental Group Life Insurance ( SGLI ); and reductions to Canadian Supplemental Executive Retirement Program ( CSERP )/ Canadian Executive Retirement Program ( CERP ). The class action alleges that, by reducing and eliminating the post-retirement benefits, GMCL (i) had breached its contractual and fiduciary obligations to provide Post-Retirement Benefits to the Class, (ii) was unjustly enriched and (iii) had made negligent misrepresentations regarding the provision of Basic Group Life Insurance and that Class Members have suffered financial damages. This case was certified (i.e. permitted by the Court to proceed) as a class proceeding in October 2011. Many of the issues in the lawsuit were subsequently determined in a motion for partial summary judgment, which was decided by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in July 2013. The Court ruled in favour of most of the class members, determining that GMCL could not reduce or eliminate their benefits after retirement. However, the Court ruled that GMCL was within its rights to reduce the benefits of class members who continued to work after the reductions to benefits were announced (i.e. in late 2007 for health benefits, and in late 2009 for life insurance benefits) The Court also ruled that GMCL was within its rights to reduce or

- 3 - eliminate benefits granted pursuant to the Canadian Supplemental Executive Retirement Program ( CSERP ) and the Canadian Executive Retirement Program ( CERP ). A copy of the Court s decision can be obtained at http://canlii.ca/t/fzppr or from Class Counsel. Subsequently, GMCL appealed those portions of the Court s judgment that it lost and the plaintiff brought a cross-appeal seeking to overturn those parts of the judgment that the Class Members did not succeed on. The agreement to settle the class action occurred shortly before the appeal was scheduled to be heard by the Ontario Court of Appeal in June 2014. 3. WHAT ARE THE DETAILS OF THE SETTLEMENT? The detailed terms of the settlement are set out in the settlement agreement between the parties. A copy of it can be found at www.genmo.ca or www.sgmlaw.com or can be obtained by contacting Class Counsel. There are three principal components to the settlement. A. REINSTATEMENT OF HEALTH BENEFITS FOR ALL CLASS MEMBERS. The settlement provides that, as of September 1, 2014, most of the health benefits that GMCL reduced will be reinstated for all Class Members, and that they will now be treated the same as those persons who retired on or before December 31, 1994. Class Members will still be required to make healthcare contributions, which may increase in the future, and Class Members will still be subject to the restriction on over-the-counter medications which applies to GMCL retirees who retired on or before December 31, 1994. A complete description of the new health benefits that Class Members will receive under the settlement can be found at www.genmo.ca or www.sgmlaw.com or can be obtained by contacting Class Counsel. B. REINSTATEMENT OF THE MAJORITY OF BASIC LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR ALL CLASS MEMBERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL GROUP LIFE INSURANCE BENEFITS ( SGLI ) FOR CLASS MEMBERS WHO WERE EXECUTIVES The settlement provides that 2/3 of the reduced basic life insurance benefits (and SGLI for executives) will be reinstated. For example, if prior to the reduction in basic life insurance benefits, you were entitled to a total of $80,000, and after the reduction was implemented you were advised that your life insurance benefit was reduced to $20,000, your new entitlement, under the settlement will be as follows: $20,000 reduced life insurance benefit. + $40,000 (2/3 of $60,000 being the difference between the original life insurance benefit and the reduced life insurance benefit) = $60,000

- 4 - The settlement does not restore the CSERP/CERP benefits for executives, although it does restore the SGLI benefit at the same level (2/3) as the basic group life insurance benefit. Any disputes regarding the settlement will be subject to arbitration. C. SETTLEMENT FUND GMCL will pay $9 million into a fund set up by the Representative Plaintiff and Class Counsel for Class Members to compensate them for the loss of life insurance benefits and health benefits between July 1, 2008 and August 31, 2014. The money will be distributed as follows: First, to the beneficiaries of Class Members who died (or die) between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2014 and have received (or receive) reduced life insurance benefits from GMCL. Second, the remaining funds will be distributed to Class Members in equal amounts to compensate them for health benefits lost between July 1, 2008 and August 31, 2014. Further detail about the proposed formula for distributing the settlement fund can be found at http://www.genmo.ca and www.sgmlaw.com. GMCL is not responsible for the distribution or administration of the fund. 4. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THE SETTLEMENT? The settlement entirely resolves the issues in the class action. The settlement represents a compromise of the disputed issues in the litigation. It provides in some respects for greater benefits than ordered by the Court on the summary judgment motion, because it extends the benefits of the successful resolution of this matter to all Class Members who have not opted out of the Class Action, including individuals who continued to work after the reductions to the benefits were announced (who were excluded under the Court s decision). However, in some respects, the settlement provides for lesser benefits, including discounted life insurance benefits and the requirement that Class Members make monthly contributions to their health benefits plan. The settlement takes into account a variety of factors including the risks inherent in continuing the litigation and the time that would be required to finally resolve the matter, including appeals. 5. HOW DO I GET COMPENSATED? 6. FUTURE BENEFITS The restored benefits will take effect on September 1, 2014. You should continue to make health benefits claims as you did before. For any healthcare expenses incurred on or after September 1, 2014, you will be compensated at the new benefits level.

- 5 - For any class member who dies on or after September 1, 2014, his or her beneficiary will receive basic life insurance and SGLI (if applicable) in accordance with the formula set out at section 3(B). 7. PAST BENEFITS Life Insurance The beneficiaries of Class Members who died between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2014 will be compensated in accordance with the formula set out at section 3(B) for basic life insurance and SGLI (if applicable). Cheques will be sent directly and should be received no later than December 1, 2014. If you believe that you are entitled to compensation for past life insurance losses and do not receive a cheque by that time, please contact Class Counsel. Health Benefits The remaining funds will be distributed equally to all Class Members who have not opted out of the Class Action. Cheques will be sent directly and should be received no later than January 30, 2015. If you believe that you are entitled to compensation for past health benefits losses and do not receive a cheque by that time, please contact Class Counsel. Class Counsel will make best efforts to ensure that all settlement funds are distributed. In the event that any funds cannot be distributed by May 1, 2015, Class Counsel will seek further direction from the Court. 8. CLASS COUNSEL FEES / CLASS PROCEEDINGS FUND LEVY GMCL has agreed to pay Class Counsel $3 million in respect of all legal fees, disbursements, and expert and administration costs (as well as any taxes respecting same) associated with the settlement. Out of this money, Class Counsel will pay $1,033,334.06 to the Class Proceedings Fund for payment of a levy and the refund of funded disbursements pursuant to Ontario Regulation 771/92. This payment is separate and apart from the settlement fund and will not reduce any amount that you are entitled to receive under the settlement fund. 9. OTHER MATTERS The plaintiff has been granted indemnification and funding from the Class Proceedings Fund ( CPF ). The CPF was established by the Law Foundation of Ontario to provide financial support to class action plaintiffs for disbursements (including faxes, filing fees, expert reports, etc). The CPF is entitled by law to receive a levy in the amount of 10% in any awards or settlements in favour of the plaintiff, together with a return of any funded disbursements.

- 6-10. TO CONTACT CLASS COUNSEL For further information about the class proceeding lawsuit you may contact: Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP 20 Dundas Street W., Suite 1100 Toronto ON M5G 2G8 Attn: Tricia Brioux Tel: 416.979.4233 Fax: 416.591.7333 www.sgmlaw.com email tbrioux@sgmlaw.com F:\OFFICE\00654422.DOCX