Network Audit. Net.Audit service is intended to verify compliance with Telecom services provided by Telecom Carriers and Telecom Operators.



Similar documents
Net.Audit distributed Test System

SLA verification + QoS control: the base for successful VoIP & IPTV deployments

Customer White paper. SmartTester. Delivering SLA Activation and Performance Testing. November 2012 Author Luc-Yves Pagal-Vinette

VoIP Conformance Labs

Using & Offering Wholesale Ethernet Network and Operational Considerations

Driving Service Delivery with SLA Performance Management

UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS ETHERNET SERVICES

UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS ETHERNET SERVICES

Session 4 Developing a Regulatory Framework for Quality of Service / Quality of Experience ITU ASP RO

MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider Whitepaper

WHITEPAPER MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider

Corporate Network Services of Tomorrow Business-Aware VPNs

Application Notes. Introduction. Contents. Managing IP Centrex & Hosted PBX Services. Series. VoIP Performance Management. Overview.

Evolution of telecom network infrastructure for broadcast and interactive applications

Transport for Enterprise VoIP Services

Bandwidth Profiles for Ethernet Services Ralph Santitoro

Introduction to Quality of Service. Andrea Bianco Telecommunication Network Group

Bandwidth Profiles for Ethernet Services Ralph Santitoro

IP QoS Interoperability Issues

APPLICATION NOTE 209 QUALITY OF SERVICE: KEY CONCEPTS AND TESTING NEEDS. Quality of Service Drivers. Why Test Quality of Service?

Management of Telecommunication Networks. Prof. Dr. Aleksandar Tsenov

Whitepaper. 10 Metrics to Monitor in the LTE Network. blog.sevone.com

Synchronous Ethernet explained

Burst Testing. New mobility standards and cloud-computing network. This application note will describe how TCP creates bursty

IP SLAs Overview. Finding Feature Information. Information About IP SLAs. IP SLAs Technology Overview

10 METRICS TO MONITOR IN THE LTE NETWORK. [ WhitePaper ]

ICTTEN6172A Design and configure an IP- MPLS network with virtual private network tunnelling

Voice and Data Convergence

GigE Triple Play PIM. Comprehensive prioritization support including VLAN Q-in-Q, layer 3 IP ToS and Cisco DSCP

MPLS: Key Factors to Consider When Selecting Your MPLS Provider

How To Provide Qos Based Routing In The Internet

Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)

SPIRENT PERFORMANCE MONITORING FOR ETHERNET QUALITY OF SERVICE SPIRENT TESTCENTER LIVE PERFORMANCE MONITORING

Application Notes Multi-service EDD-Ethernet Demarcation Device

Ethernet is service provider terms can be delivered from speeds starting from 1mb all the way up to 1Gb+.

VPLS lies at the heart of our Next Generation Network approach to creating converged, simplified WANs.

THE IMPORTANCE OF TESTING TCP PERFORMANCE IN CARRIER ETHERNET NETWORKS

VoIP QoS. Version 1.0. September 4, AdvancedVoIP.com. Phone:

XO Wide Area Network ( WAN ) Services IP Virtual Private Network Services Ethernet VPLS Services

Blue 102. IP Service Architecture Futures. Geoff Huston May 2000

ICTNPL5071A Develop planning strategies for core network design

Carrier-class Ethernet: A Services Definition

H.323 Traffic Characterization Test Plan Draft Paul Schopis,

ICTTEN6043A Undertake network traffic management

MDI / QoE for IPTV and VoIP

Technical Specification MEF 6.1. Ethernet Services Definitions - Phase 2. April, 2008

PART II. OPS-based metro area networks

Synchronization Essentials of VoIP WHITE PAPER

LTE-Capable Mobile Backhaul

Best Effort gets Better with MPLS. Superior network flexibility and resiliency at a lower cost with support for voice, video and future applications

MPLS-TP. Future Ready. Today. Introduction. Connection Oriented Transport

Critical Communications Network Security and Disaster Recovery Do You Know How Vulnerable You Really Are? All rights reserved 2005, Alcatel

Service Definition. Internet Service. Introduction. Product Overview. Service Specification

Monitoring Service Delivery in an MPLS Environment

APPENDIX 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3

Deploying Multiservice Applications Using RPR Over the Existing SONET Infrastructure

VoIP / SIP Planning and Disclosure

White paper. Reliable and Scalable TETRA networks

The need for bandwidth management and QoS control when using public or shared networks for disaster relief work

APPENDIX 8 TO SCHEDULE 3.3

Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service

The Triple Play Analysis Suite - VoIP. Key Features. Standard VoIP Protocol G.711 SIP RTP / RTCP. Ethernet / PPP. XDSL, Metro Ethernet

Enhancing Converged MPLS Data Networks with ATM, Frame Relay and Ethernet Interworking

WAN and VPN Solutions:

The Keys for Campus Networking: Integration, Integration, and Integration

Verifying Metro Ethernet Quality of Service

CARRIER MPLS VPN September 2014

APPLICATION NOTE 183 RFC 2544: HOW IT HELPS QUALIFY A CARRIER ETHERNET NETWORK. Telecom Test and Measurement. What is RFC 2544?

SERVICE SCHEDULE FOR ETHERNET PASS-THROUGH SERVICES

Whitepaper. A Guide to Ensuring Perfect VoIP Calls. blog.sevone.com info@sevone.com

STANDPOINT FOR QUALITY-OF-SERVICE MEASUREMENT

CISCO IOS IP SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS: ASSURE THE DELIVERY OF IP SERVICES AND APPLICATIONS

Application Note. Pre-Deployment and Network Readiness Assessment Is Essential. Types of VoIP Performance Problems. Contents

Requirements of Voice in an IP Internetwork

Troubleshooting Common Issues in VoIP

NGN Network Architecture

REMOTE MONITORING MATRIX

IP videoconferencing solution with ProCurve switches and Tandberg terminals

WHITEPAPER. VPLS for Any-to-Any Ethernet Connectivity: When Simplicity & Control Matter

JDSU Ethernet Testing

How To Test For Performance On An Ethersam (Itu-T Y.O.O)

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE IN VOICE OVER IP

Operational Core Network

Quality of Service. Traditional Nonconverged Network. Traditional data traffic characteristics:

Evaluating Carrier-Class Ethernet Services

MENTER Overview. Prepared by Mark Shayman UMIACS Contract Review Laboratory for Telecommunications Science May 31, 2001

QoS issues in Voice over IP

Carrier Ethernet Services

Ethernet Service OAM. Standards and Functionality. Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) Fault Detection. White Paper

Network Instruments white paper

Proactive Video Assurance through QoE and QoS Correlation

WHY CHOOSE COX BUSINESS FOR YOUR COMPANY S NETWORK SERVICE NEEDS?

Advancements in field measurement of Ethernet performance

Design and analysis of flow aware load balancing mechanisms for multi-service networks

Planning an IP Network for Voice and Data

Implementing VoIP monitoring solutions. Deployment note

Region 10 Videoconference Network (R10VN)

IP/MPLS. Marios Parperis - Alcatel-Lucent Energy Systems Integration Division. October Alcatel-Lucent 2010 All Rights Reserved

Driving Service Delivery with SLA Performance Monitoring

Carrier Ethernet SLAs Technology Advancements to Differentiate and Improve Operational Efficiency

Transcription:

Auditing Network GbE, Auditing, Carrier Telecom Ethernet, Training, MPLS, Telecom IPTV, Consulting VoIP, VoIP, SDH, FTTH, VDSL2, QoE, consulting services telecom telecomunicaciones españa spain consultoría albedo telecom, auditing services telecom telecomunicaciones españa spain auditoria albedo telecom, training formación telecom telecomunicaciones españa spain training formación albedo telecom, instrumentacion telecom telecomunicaciones GbE, Carrier Ethernet, MPLS, IPTV, VoIP, VoIP, SDH, FTTH, VDSL2, QoE the Path to Excellence Network Audit Objetives Definition of service provider agreement (SLA). SLA verification. Validation of IP network quality end to end, even in heterogeneous networks. Abstract Net.Audit service is intended to verify compliance with Telecom services provided by Telecom Carriers and Telecom Operators. AUDIT_SLA_ENG 80 Ad hoc or permanent monitoring of the quality and capacity of Metro-Ethernet access, ADSL2 + and FTTH. Verification mechanisms interruption restoration time limits in case of falls. Users of this service generally are responsible for network aimed at wanting to know as an operator or a carrier manages voice, video or data in terms of quality, performance and availability. (C) ALBEDO TELECOM

2 1. Network Commissioning 1.1. The Infrastructures Net.Audit users will review the network directly, identifying strategic points of monitoring and the scope, duration, and frequency of audits. The objective is to review the critical points of access ADSL2 +, VDSL2, FTTH or FTTN, review aggregation nodes Carrier-Ethernet and IP Routers, along with the interfaces provided by the Telecom Carrier / Operator. You can define the most appropriate criteria to verify the network infrastructure and identify critical issues even conflicts between Operators and Carriers. You will be able to prioritize the most critical points that may affect the network under supervision while creating report that lists traces and findings. The support provided by ALBEDO suggest list of recommendations andpotential solutions. 1.2. Ad hoc Analysis You do need send experts to analyzing and discuss the issues that concern the service. Net.Audit is a remote monitoring tool with a methodology to verify telecom services remotely in a centralized way by mean of a web server. We've spent years improving the quality and effectiveness of networks in both public and private sectors. We have developed contingency plans and helped optimize critical applications. 1.3. Remote Auditing Do you know that most of elusive issues in telecommunications networks can be identified and solved remotely? Often they can be detected remotely using prober monitoring a measurement tools connected at the most stantard network interfaces such as Ethernet / IP. ALBEDO Telecom will work with you and using simple tools, sometimes as a telephone or e-mail, and sometimes sophisticated, such as generator / analyzers or probes to monitor traffic. The trace file can be sent and reviewed on site. And if you want an engineer Albedo Telecom. You can connect remotely to your network analyzer on a secure and execute a remote analysis. This is a fast and comfortable to verify your network and check whether it is behaving correctly. 1.4. Ready for Triple Play? The large-scale deployment of converged services over IP networks such as Voice, Video and Television requires a feasibility study that clearly identifies the levels of quality (QoS), as well as Bandwdth constraints and bottlenecks that could affect their normal use. The effectiveness of a teleapplication is a combination of multiple factors that include network architecture, and transmision media. It do also depends on resource management, serialization of traffic, congestion control and other factors. Therefore the introduction of a new application such as VoIP is never deterministic in terms of sustainability and quality. In some respects the use of the right tools and a methodology allow the analysis of the capacity, and quality that affect your network. They really determine the success -or failure- in the implementation of new services. It is fundamental to identify those weaknesses of the telecom networks as the first decisition to improve new applications. 1.5. SLA Today's networks require precise control and proper maintenance to ensure reliable service. It is important that neither party feels aggrieved, then supplier and customer may specify Service Delivery Agreements (SLA) and guarantee that commitments are met. It is important to evaluate equipment and software meeting the standards of service interface and any problems that may affect the network. Their work confirms that part complies with the commitments defined in the SLA.

3 2. SLA methodologies Telecom Auditing generally is executed in two modes depending on if it is done during a limited period of time, or permanently when is transformed into a monitoring process. 2.1. SLA verification The SLA is verified only when required in a timely manner. The process can be conducted in four stages: 1. Study. Definition of measuring points. 1. Telecom SLAs The provision of telecom services should be subject to a formal agreement to link customer-supplier under a contract that defines the parameters of the service and would serve as reference framework. The SLA should define responsibilities of each party, mechanisms for monitoring, event aspects regarding management and support, and may include a description of fees and penalties. When telecom was a monopolistic business, and services were based on circuits, SLA played a minor role. It was the arrival of packet networks such as X.25 and Frame Relay when SLAs were moved to more relevant place, but its final takeoff has occurred with the adoption of Ethernet / IP as the unified transport network. We all know that the packet networks are more efficient and cheaper than their predecessors based on circuits, the problem is that native packet networks can t guarantee, or have more difficulties to achieve or a certain levels of quality. This can be a serious drawback to transport audio and video, even to transport data. 1.1. SLA structure A service level agreement should not be a simple document of generic terms, but must contain explicit content. Firstly, an SLA should describe the telecom services provided in terms of capacity and quality, for every single access contract. SLA should also describe those mechanisms for remote monitoring and periodic reports about service performance. Nor should they ignored the mechanisms for the resolution of problems and a clear statement of material and human support provided by the supplier. Finally, the SLA should also apply to the address what operator does and how compensate customer in case of fault of low quality service. This is particularly important when telecommunications is an essential part for the normal operation the operation of the company. We are talking not only about refunds or penalties, but also the mechanisms to enhance the service or the allocation of new resources that eventually may facilitate the SLA compliance. 2. Online tests. Includes verification of QoS parameters and traffic characterization. 3. Offline tests. Check QoS parameters under controlled traffic conditions. 4. Reporting. Consists of a report results and conclusions. 2.2. Permanent Monitoring SLAN monitoring aims to detect all violations of the SLA for an indefinitely period of time. This makes it possible to detect all the violations of the SLA agreement and provide the customer with evidence to tell network provider about the service. Monitoring probes would be installed while detailed quality traces and reports about the services are made available for all parties.

4 3. Real Measurements The audit is performed in the points and interfaces identified by the client or those where it is possible to obtain representative information. pected of suffering a loss in quality. Traffic Characterization Poor quality over WAN connections can be caused by many reasons as overloaded network can cause delays or loss of data if the average speed of transmission is above the threshold for admission. The traffic characterization is intended to quantify the amount of traffic that accepts the network and its composition. Equipment and probes used to monitor QoS parameters. In general, the demarcation points that separate supplier network - customer network are prime candidates for in-service-monitoring / out-of-service-measurements. Nevertheless other points should be considered such as neutral point of the operator and point into the customer network is large. 3.1. On-line test Are long-term tests (recommended minimum one week) made on the fringes of normal network operation. In the form of permanent monitoring, the probes remain connected to the customer during the duration of the contract audit. 3.2. Out of Service tests To determine if the operator offers the capability described in the SLA is necessary to inject synthetic traffic and observe the evolution of relevant QoS parameters depending on the load. This process allows us to observe the behavior of the network at different levels of stress, up to the congestion. In order to avoid any inference that part of the audit is performed in bands with low occupancy of the network as night time, weekends or holidays. Quality according rec ITU-T Y.1451 Service Y Prediction of Multiplay Service ITU-T class 7-6 6 4 3 1-2 QoS Monitoring QoS measures between two points on the WAN of the operator evaluated parameters such as availability, delay, jitter and packet loss. Service X Sample of results presentation Multiplay IP 90% 60% 25% 10% n.a. Typically one of the key points is to audit the network where the servers are connected, since it is where more traffic is added. Then have to click all those in which it is observed or sus-

5 Parametros QoS parameters de Performance Parametros Delay parameters de Retardo (ii) Minimum Minimun Delay Delay HQ SILVER 300 Paket Loss (IPLR) Out of Seq (IPRR) BERT error (IPER) 0,5 1,5 CIR 5,5 5 3 Velocidad Mbit/s Bitrate (Mbit/s) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 Porcentage % Network Delay (IPTD) Minumum Delay Interarrival Time (IPDV) 72 500 1000 Frame Size (bytes) Tamaño Trama (bytes) 500 400 300 200 100 0 1500 Tiempo (ms) Tiempo (ms) 250 200 150 100 50 0 72 500 1000 1500 Frame Size (bytes) Tamaño Trama (bytes) BERT error (IPER) Out of Seq (IPRR) Paket Loss (IPLR) Network Delay (IPTD) Minumum Delay Interarrival Time (IPDV) Min. Network Delay Constant monitoring of quality, availability and traffic characterization. 4. SLA in Carrier class Ethernet Networks The audit of the PAB at the point of demarcation supplier-customer should verify: Ethernet began as a best effort technology for local area networks, ie no ability to provide quality of service. Subsequent adoption in metropolitan networks (MAN) and wide (WAN), has been achieved through the use of other technologies such as MPLS, VPLS, NG-SDH, or WDM, which have improved the native capabilities of Ethernet. The result has been a new multiservice network effective for implementing data transactions for the transport and distribution of voice and video which is more difficult because they have more demanding requirements in terms of bandwidth profile (PAB) and quality of service (QoS). This is the reason why the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) advised that the SLA of Carrier Ethernet networks include both capacity metrics like quality. 4.1. Performance Metrics Committed Information Rate (CIR) expressed in bit / s defines the bandwidth involved. Committed Burst Size (CBS) defines the maximum size of a burst in bytes. Excess Information Rate (EIR) in bit / s defines the bytes that are admitted to the network but without commitment to quality Excess Burst Size (EBS) in bytes defines the maximum size of a burst without compromising on quality. The frames sent by the CIR, is marked as green, they must meet the quality objectives described marked on the SLA. The plots within the EIR, that is marked yellow, must be delivered to the end but without compromising on performance. Finally exceeding the EIR should be discarded. A basic attribute is what defines the bandwidth or speed with which a user can send frames to the provider's network. This is called the bandwidth profile (PAB) which should always be part of the SLA as just protecting both the supplier and the user. The supplier to avoid contention in the network, the user because it knows exactly the service you are paying.

6 4.2. Quality Metrics The evidence of quality of service (QoS) are associated with the Ethernet Virtual Circuit and consider the following parameters: Frame delay time has elapsed since sending the first bit until the arrival of the latter. The delay can be divided into three parts. Two parts are still being related to the profile of bandwidth to rely on the transmission rate and frame size. The third part of the delay is variable depending on the state of the transmission network. Compliant with the delay provided by the IPPM working group in RFC 2679. Delay variation, also known as packet jitter measures the variation in packet transit through the system because of the queues, containment, processing, policy prioritization and serialization to which are subjected packets to travel on the network. Compatible with jitter specification provided by the IPPM working group in RFC 3393. Packet loss refers to the percentage of frames which, although consistent with the CIR, they are not delivered for a maximum time interval. Compatible with the specification of packet loss provided by the IPPM working group in RFC 2680. Availability is the percentage of time the network is operating normally. Carrier networks is expected levels of 99.999% or better, although this level is related to being intimately related to both the network architecture and protection mechanisms employed. For a good evaluation requires continuous monitoring. Compliant with the connectivity provided by the IPPM working group in RFC 2678. The timing of monitoring probes for the measurement of one-way delay is generally used NTP.

7 4.3. Other Tests The audit process and certification of SLA may include other tests depending on the objectives: Scalability testing, of the services and the available bandwidths Protection tests, time not available from the network while switching to their protection or back up in case of fall. TDM emulation verification, or verification of the quality of TDM circuit emulation, and especially focused on the jitter of the carrier signal. 5. Reporting Once the tests have processed all the data obtained to produce a conclusive report disclosing whether the SLA is fulfilled in its entirety. In the case of breach made explicit the circumstances in which it is not enforced. where no or not and to what end, taking into account the availability, the profile of bandwidth and quality of service observed during measurement.

ALBEDO Telecom ALBEDO Telecom designs, manufactures, and delivers solutions that enable Telecom organizations of all sizes to test, measure, troubleshoot, monitor, and migrate mission critical networks and multiplay applications. On local segments and across distributed networks, ALBEDO enable Organizations, Installers, Operators, Service Providers and Suppliers to quickly check the health of Network Architectures, Service Agreements (SLA), IP Quality (QoS), or fix any issue. Your Business Partner Results. ALBEDO Telecom helps the industry to make the most of the investment on infrastructure. Expertise. ALBEDO Telecom engineers and consultants provide industry leading knowledge in IPTV, VoIP, Carrier-Ethernet, Sync-Ethernet, SDH, and WDM / OTN to address the unique needs of customers. Integration. ALBEDO Telecom integrates disparate telecom technologies and applications, facilitating new business efficiencies. Agility. ALBEDO Telecom increases the ability of customers to respond quickly to new market opportunities and requirements. Coverage. ALBEDO Telecom offers solutions that facilitates the migration and the roll-out to new architectures. the Path to Excellence Joan d Austria, 112 - Barcelona - 08018 - Spain - www.telecom.albedo.biz aims smia + UNDERSTAND causes of telecom interoperability issues + EXPERIENCE the best quality in unified networking + ASSESS different hardware, firmware, and software solutions + LEARN from experts by means of professional services and consultancy