The future of (Life) Reinsurance Evolution or Revolution?



Similar documents
SCOR inform - April Life (re)insurance under Solvency II

Capital Management in a Solvency II World & the Role of Reinsurance

Embedded Value Report

An update on QIS5. Agenda 4/27/2010. Context, scope and timelines The draft Technical Specification Getting into gear Questions

PNB Life Insurance Inc. Risk Management Framework

RISK MANAGEMENT IN LIFE INSURANCE

Reinsurance: What? Who? Why? How?

Actuarial Risk Management

THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015

SA QIS3 Key changes and challenges The end is in sight

Quantitative Impact Study 1 (QIS1) Summary Report for Belgium. 21 March 2006

IRSG Response to IAIS Consultation Paper on Basic Capital Requirements (BCR) for Global Systemically Important Insurers (G-SIIS)

Glossary of insurance terms

Solvency II Pillar III Quantitative Reporting Templates (QRTs) Sinead Clarke, Eoin King 11 th December 2012

Life Insurance risk management in the Insurance company : CSOB case studies

Disclosure of European Embedded Value as of March 31, 2015

ING Insurance Economic Capital Framework

Actuarial Report. On the Proposed Transfer of the Life Insurance Business from. Asteron Life Limited. Suncorp Life & Superannuation Limited

COMMISSION DELEGATED DECISION (EU) / of

The package of measures to avoid artificial volatility and pro-cyclicality

Solvency II Introduction to Pillar 3. Friday 20 th May 2016

IASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 16 May This paper discusses the accounting for reinsurance and asks the boards to decide whether to:

Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB)

LIFE INSURANCE CAPITAL FRAMEWORK STANDARD APPROACH

CEIOPS-DOC-33/09. (former CP 39) October 2009

Key performance indicators

Longevity risk transfer. Cord-Roland Rinke, L&H Asia and Longevity

VALUATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR SOLVENCY PURPOSES IN LONG TERM INSURANCE DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TS14-01(D)

Embedded Value 2014 Report

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD DECEMBER 2004 FRS 27 27LIFE ASSURANCE STANDARD FINANCIAL REPORTING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD

International Financial Reporting for Insurers: IFRS and U.S. GAAP September 2009 Session 25: Solvency II vs. IFRS

Life Insurance Corporation (Singapore)Pte Ltd UEN E MANAGEMENT REPORT 31/12/2014

Guidelines on the valuation of technical provisions

INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION

Enterprise Risk Management in a Highly Uncertain World. A Presentation to the Government-University- Industry Research Roundtable June 20, 2012

SOLVENCY II HEALTH INSURANCE

GLOSSARY. A contract that provides for periodic payments to an annuitant for a specified period of time, often until the annuitant s death.

Solvency Assessment and Management Third South African Quantitative Impact Study (SA QIS3)

Comparing Life Insurer Longevity Risk Transfer Strategies in a Multi-Period Valuation Framework

Case Study Modeling Longevity Risk for Solvency II

1. This Prudential Standard is made under paragraph 230A(1)(a) of the Life Insurance Act 1995 (the Act).

Solvency II Standard Model for Health Insurance Business

Subject SA2. CMP Upgrade 2015/16. CMP Upgrade

Standard Life plc. Solvency II and capital insight session

Hannover Re - before and after the crisis. Roland Vogel CFO

Life Insurance Corporation (Singapore)Pte Ltd UEN E MANAGEMENT REPORT 31/12/2013

Rating Methodology by Sector. Non-life Insurance

Fourth study of the Solvency II standard approach

Proposed Insurance Act Amendments Life Insurance

Solvency 2 Preparatory Phase. Comparison with LTGA specifications. June 2014

Rating Methodology by Sector. Life Insurance

Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB)

This amount shall be net of any recoverable from reinsurance contract/spv and Finite Re related to this business. C0020 to C0390/R0010 (A1 to AL1)

CHAPTER 57 - LIFE AND HEALTH REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS

Session 106 PD, Reinsurance for Capital Management of Health Insurance Business. Moderator/Presenter: Michael David Mulcahy, FSA, MAAA

Guide to Financial Reporting In Irish Life & Permanent plc European Embedded Value and IFRS

Disclosure of Market Consistent Embedded Value as at March 31, 2015

Longevity risk. What do South African and UK retirement frameworks have in common??

Attachment Probability The attachment probability is the likelihood a cat bond will suffer some losses over the course of a one-year period.

M&A in a Solvency II World - An introduction to the S2AV methodology

Modelling and Management of Tail Risk in Insurance

Fasano Associates 7 th Annual Conference. Longevity Risk Protection. Cormac Treanor Vice President Wilton Re. October 18, 2010

Actuary s Guide to Reporting on Insurers of Persons Policy Liabilities. Senior Direction, Supervision of Insurers and Control of Right to Practice

GLOSSARY. A contract that provides for periodic payments to an annuitant for a specified period of time, often until the annuitant s death.

INSURANCE RATING METHODOLOGY

Autumn Investor Seminar. Workshops. Managing Variable Annuity Risk

Capital Adequacy Calculation Workbook Level 1 general insurers

LIFE INSURANCE RATING METHODOLOGY CREDIT RATING AGENCY OF

Guidelines on ring-fenced funds

UnumProvident. Life Insurance Securitization: An Overview

Society of Actuaries in Ireland

R&I Rating Methodology by Sector

Introduction. Coverage. Principle 1: Embedded Value (EV) is a measure of the consolidated value of shareholders interests in the covered business.

Rating Methodology for Domestic Life Insurance Companies

Remarks by George Quinn (slides 2 to 12), Chief Financial Officer of Zurich Insurance Group.

Session 11: Reinsurance Accounting

IIPRC-A-05-I. INDIVIDUAL IMMEDIATE NON-VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACT STANDARDS (Including contracts used to fund structured settlement agreements)

Guidelines on look-through approach

Statistics. Quarterly Life Insurance Performance XXXXX 2008 (issued XX XXXXX 2009) Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

Application of Interest Rate Swaps in Indian Insurance Industry Amruth Krishnan Rohit Ajgaonkar Guide: G.LN.Sarma

Risk management for long-term guaranteed annuity products. Investment risk. Keywords: longevity risk, ageing, retirement, annuity, regulation.

Solvency II for Beginners

FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR LIFE INSURANCE BUSINESS. V Rajagopalan R Kannan K S Gopalakrishnan

Life Insurance (prudential standard) determination No. 7 of 2010

Rating Methodology by Sector. Non-life Insurance

Fifth Quantitative Impact Study of Solvency II (QIS5)

ING GROUP EMBEDDED VALUE REPORT 2007

Transcription:

The future of (Life) Reinsurance Evolution or Revolution? Alexandra Field RGA International Frauengruppe - SAV Arbeitsgruppentagung 28.08.2015, Olten

Content A. Life reinsurance in the past and up to now B. Why do we expect (life) reinsurance to change? C. Possible reinsurance solutions in the future D. Closing remarks 2

A. Life reinsurance in the past and up to now 3

Life Reinsurance Treaties Life Reinsurance Proportional Non-proportional Mainly proportional coverages Surplus Cover XL per risk Non-proportional coverages not very common Quota Share (risk premium basis) Stop Loss Cover Quota Share (original basis) Cat XL cover 4

B. Why do we expect (life) reinsurance to change? 5

B. Why do we expect life reinsurance to change in the future? 1 Life insurance is currently undergoing significant changes 2 Buying reinsurance: same reasons new solutions. 3 Reinsurers are developping new business models 6

1. Life insurance is currently undergoing significant changes 1. Low interest rate environment challenges life insurers traditional business model 2. Managing market risk becomes key 3. Increased focus on biometric risks and products a) New biometric risks (e.g. Incapacity to work, essential abililties, ) b) Trend to differentiating risks (preferrd tariffs, telematics tariffs, underwritten annuities, ) 4. Demographic changes: aging Western populations 5. Introduction of market consistent RBC capital regimes (SST / SII) 7

2. Reasons for buying reinsurance 1 To manage risk 2 To manage capital. 3 To have access to service and information 8

2.1. Reinsurance to manage risk Managing risk as obvious reason for reinsurance: Reduction of volatility Protection against o Risk of random fluctuations o Risk of change o Risk of error Risk-based capital regimes introduce an intimate link between risk management and capital management: Transferring risk reduces corresponding capital requirement All Reinsurance will be assessed in the context of capital relief 9

2.2. Reinsurance to manage capital Capital efficient reinsurance is reinsurance with improvement of capital position as primary objective. Capital efficient reinsurance will change comprehensively through SST / SII Depressed solvency ratios under SST / SII (at average) increased need for capital efficient reinsurance 10

Reinsurance under Solvency I Solvency Margin and relief through reinsurance measured very easily based on factors on volumes and limited by arbitrary factors Life * Non-Life Solvency Margin 1. 4% of statutory reserves (1% for unit linked) plus 2. 0.3% * of sum at risk Max (16% -18% of premiums, 23%- 26% claims) Capital relief through reinsurance as % of the Solvency Margin 1. Min (reinsured reserves / total reserves, 15%) plus 2. Min (sum at risk reinsured / total sum at risk, 50%) Min (reinsured premium/ total premium, 50%) * Biometric life risks and riders considered by the requirements for non-life ** 0.10% - 0.15% for policies with duration up to 5 years 11

Double effect of reinsurance to the SII solvency ratio: 1. Reduction of the capital requirement and 2. Increase of available capital Basic Own Funds Capital eficient reinsurance SCR Basic Own Funds 2) Reduction Risk Margin Increase Basic Own Funds SCR Market Value of Assets Risk Margin Best Estimate Liabilities Market Value of Assets Risk Margin Best Estimate Liabilities 1.) Reduction SCR * (risk mitigating effect of reinsurance) Reinsurance Recoverable Solvency II Balance Sheet Solvency II Balance Sheet with capital efficient reinsurance * The reinsurer s counterparty risk will (slightly) increase the SCR 12

Capital efficiency of common life reinsurance treaties Reinsurance Cover Solvency ratio SI Solvency ratio SII QS on risk premium basis ++ + QS on original terms (reserve deposit) +++ + Surplus ++ + XL per risk +/- ++ Stop Loss +/- +++ Cat XL +/- + / - Mortalilty and disability risks were usually covered under such reinsurance treaties 13

2.3. Access to service and information Reinsurers international experience and large historical databases Reinsurers provide the following services: Medical Underwriting Claims management Product development Advisory services SST / SII impacts the latter two 14

Reinsurers are developing new business models 15

3. Reinsurers are developping new business models Reasons Life insurance business in many European countries hardly growing or shrinking. Consolidation process among insurers. Insurers increase share of retained business: Increase of retentions Bigger international companies pool their business internally (via internal reinsurers) and seek only little external reinsurance Currently sufficient capacity at the market (soft market) Competition with other risk-mitigating vehicles (e.g. securitisations, derivatives) 16

3. Reinsurers are developping new business models Solutions Strong investments in direct insurance business Direct insurance subsidiary Participation in direct insurance company Investments in insurance runoff business Tendency towards accepting risks which were traditionally not in the scope (market and longevity risk) 17

C. Possible reinsurance solutions for the future 18

Possible reinsurance solutions for the future Asset Intensive Reinsurance Longevity Swaps Shock Absorber Solutions Lapse Shock Absorber Longevity Shock Absorber Value-of-Inforce (VIF) financing solutions Contingent Capital Solutions Beyond Reinsurance: Portfolio transfers 19

Asset-intensive reinsurance Full Coinsurance with asset transfer Biometric risk and asset risk transferred to the reinsurer Amount of transferred assets (Single Premium) is crucial Reinsured business: savings and annuity business Reinsurer pays all future claims and benefits of reinsured portfolio EUR mln 200 100 0 Projected Annuity Liabilities 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Future Years 20

Asset-intensive reinsurance Assets are held in a way that protects insurer from reinsurer s default (e.g. in a trusted fund). Challenges in many European countries: Local regulation doesn t support transfer of assets Profit-sharing provisions in savings and annuity business 21

Longevity Swaps Longevity Swap is a reinsurance treaty in spite of the swap terminology Reinsured business: portfolio of life-contingent annuities Premiums ( fixed leg ) are defined at beginning for all future years Claims ( floating leg ) are the actual annuity payments in the future, which reflect the survival of the annuitants Insurer Fixed premiums (fixed leg) Uncertain annuity benefits (floating leg) Reinsurer 22

Example: Cash flows longevity swaps 100.000 80.000 60.000 Expected annuity benefits Annuity benefits -20% mortality Annuity benefits +20% mortality Net cash flows -20% mortality (to insurer) Net cash flows +20% mortality (from insurer) 40.000 20.000 0-20.000 23

Pricing of longevity swaps Long-term reinsurance contract: reinsurer is liable for future annuity payments until expiry Pricing is based on 3 components: 1. Expected mortality (qx,qy) 2. Mortality improvement Best Estimate Mortality 3. Reinsurer margin 24

Shock absorber solutions Stop Loss Cover to reduce capital requirements for biometric risks under stress scenarios of standard formula: Idea: Transfer a portion of tail risk within the stress scenario to improve insurer s capital position Reinsured benefit is based on a defined range (intervall) within the stress scenario defined between o Attachment point (AP) and o Detachment point (DP) Crucial: Reinsurance premium < Insurer s CoC for this covered intervall 25

Shock absorber solutions Reinsured Benefit (uncertain) Cash flow-pattern: Inception Premiums Maturity Reinsured Benefit Paid at maturity Payment uncertain, depending on development during term 26

Lapse shock absorber Capital requirement for lapse risk under the SII standard formula defined as maximum of Lapse up: Permanent increase of lapse rates by 50% Lapse down: Permanent decrease of lapse rates by 50% Mass Lapse: 40% lapses in the current year Mass Lapse scenario hurts for profitable business with low lapses. Lapse shock absorber covers insurer s actual lapse rates in excess of an attachment point (tbd) up to a detachment point (up to 40%). Reinsurance benefit to be paid if actual lapse rates exceed attachment point. 27

Longevity Shock Absorber longevityshock = immediate permanent decrease of the mortality rates by 20% which are used for calculating best estimate liabilities Basic Own Funds Risk Margin Risk Margin SCR longevity Decrease qx 5% 10% 20% 15% 0% Marktet Value of Assets Best Estimate Liabilities Marktet Value of Assets BEL @ by 20% decreased qx Market consistent balance sheet Longevity stress 28

Longevity Shock absorber Capital relief for long-term longevity risk through limited cover period Decrease of mortality rates partly covered by reinsurer Reinsured Benefit defined as interval [AP, DP] within the interval [0%,20%] of the longevity stress scenario Underlying Longevity Benefit (ULB) at maturity is key. ULB = FV(past annuities) + PV (future annuities) Reinsured Benefit = max [0, min (ULB AP, DP AP)] 29

Two Components Underlying Longevity Benefit (ULB) 1. FV of Past Annuities and 2. PV of Future Annuities 1200 1000 800 600 Maturity Date 2. Future Value of 1. 2. Past Annuities Present Value of Future Annuities Best Estimate Annuities Annuities under higher mortality Annuities under lower mortality 400 200 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Term LSA 30 30

Longevity Shock absorber Definition of underlying longevity benefit: 2 components: 1. Future Value of past annuity payments (easy) 2. Present Value of future annuities (not easy) at maturity date. Methodology to determine PV of Future Annuities set at inception: Pre-defined model to project mortality rates over remaining term liabilities Model is recalibrated based on realized mortality during term (and other available data) Data used for recalibration needs to be observable and objective 31

Value of Inforce Financing VIF financing: Quota-share agreement Reinsurance pays commission and participates in future profits of the business Expected profits in future premiums (EPIFP) Tier 1 capital under SII VIF financing is not effectice under SII But: If SII shortens contract boundaries VIF financing improves the solvency ratio under SII VIF financing for optimising other bases (e.g. statutory income) unchanged 32

Contingent Capital Solutions Capital relief through just-in-time reinsurance capital Insurer buys the option to enter into a reinsurance treaty or to increase share or extend duration of existing treaty Option is triggered through pre-agreed conditions, e.g.: movement at financial markets (interests, equity) decrease of insurer s capital Can support fungibility of capital within the group 33

Beyond Reinsurance: Portfolio Transfers Long-term traditional business puts significant pressure on life insurers Exit structures attractive for non-core business Growing market for acquiring run-off portfolios: Equity Firms (usually cooperate with reinsurers ) Reinsurers (via subsidiaries) Run-off platforms Capital relief through transfer of non-core business 34

D. Closing Remarks 35

Evolution or Revolution? What will the future bring? Life Reinsurance or Portfolio Transfers? Proportional Non-proportional Surplus Cover XL per risk Quota Share (risk premium basis) Stop Loss Cover Asset Intensive Reinsurance Quota Share (original basis) Cat XL cover 36

Thanks for your attention Any Questions? Any Comments? Alexandra Field, Manager Business Development Global Financial Solutions Tel.: +49 221 964998 43 Mobile: +49 173 5314 001 Email: afield@rgare.com RGA International Reinsurance Company Limited Niederlassung für Deutschland Kaiser-Wilhelm-Ring 15 50672 Köln Internet: www.rgare.com 37

Legal Disclaimer This material is intended to provide the recipient (the Recipient ) with a summary of potential transaction structures and terms and conditions that may or may not lead to transactions being entered into between RGA and the Recipient. Unless and until both RGA and the Recipient agree to, and sign, formal written contracts it is not intended that either RGA or the Recipient are, or will be, bound by any of these proposed terms and conditions. This material is confidential and is intended for use only by the Recipient and its professional advisers and remains the property of RGA. It should not be reproduced or disclosed to any other person without the prior written consent of RGA. Nothing in this material should be construed as legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment advice or as a recommendation or an offer by RGA to purchase securities from or sell securities to the Recipient, or to underwrite or place securities of the Recipient, or to extend any credit or like facilities to the Recipient, or to conduct any such activity on behalf of the Recipient. RGA makes no representations or warranties with respect to the material, and disclaims all liability for any use the Recipient or its advisers make of the contents of the material. This shall not, however, restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction, which may not lawfully be disclaimed. Any views or opinions expressed in the material (including statements or forecasts) constitute the judgement of RGA as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice. RGA does not undertake to update this material. The Recipient should not rely on any representations or undertakings inconsistent with the above paragraphs. 38

2015 RGA. All rights reserved.