The PEROSH OSH Evidence Search Documentation Form Collected systematic reviews for the topic: Interventions to prevent occupational injuries in teen workers No. Reference Study grading (sum of R-AMSTAR scores) Pubmed link Hartling, L., et al. (004). "A systematic review of interventions to prevent childhood farm injuries." Pediatrics 4(4): e483-496. 3/44 PMID: 5466075 Rautiainen, R. H., et al. (008). "Interventions for preventing injuries in the agricultural industry." Cochrane Database Syst Rev(): Cd006398. 39/44 PMID: 8540 PEROSH Clearinghouse Search Documentation Form Name: Martha Leticia Sámano Ríos, Ruth Stephen and Rajeswari S. Institute/Organisation: FIOH (TTL) Kuopio-Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group. Address and e-mail: Työterveyslaitos, Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group. Neulaniementie 4PL 30, 700 Kuopio Finland. Martha.SamanoRios@ttl.fi /mar.samano@gmail.com, ruthstephenz@yahoo.com and rssrajeswari6@gmail.com
. Objective: collecting and grading Systematic Reviews for the topic Interventions to prevent occupational injuries in teen workers.. Question: Which interventions prevent occupational injuries in teen workers? Population: Intervention: Comparison: workers from to <8 years old (from both formal or informal employment sectors) any intervention (legislation, training, personal protective equipment, incentives, engineering controls ) no intervention or any alternative intervention Outcome: rate of occupational injuries 3. Searched Databases: Database Time span Date searched (yyyy-mm-dd) Citations in database Citations after duplicate check MEDLINE (PubMed) 000-04 04-0-6 99 99 EMBASE (OVID) 000-04 04-0-8 60 6 Cochrane Library Systematic Reviews in OSH by Institute of Work & Health. Canada BAUA literature Science Direct All records available All records available All records available 004- current 04-0-4 0 0 04-0-8 04-0-8 04-0-8 4 Total 395 58 Additional searches: Source Hand searching through references from full-texts of selected studies Original full-text Gallagher, S. S. (0). "Characteristics of evaluated childhood agricultural safety interventions." J Agromedicine 7(): 09-6. Date searched (yyyy-mm-dd) Citations Citations after duplicate check 04-03-4 Total GRAND TOTAL 59
4. Search Strategy: MEDLINE via PubMed, searched 6.0.04 ("young worker" OR "young workers" OR "teen workers" OR "adolescent workers" OR "child labour" OR "child workers" OR "children workers" OR "young farm workers" OR "young farmer" OR "young farmers" OR "adolescent farmer" OR "young construction workers" OR "teen construction worker" OR "young miners" OR "adolescent work" OR "child work" OR "domestic work" OR "young restaurant workers" OR "child carrier" OR "child carriers" OR "children carriers" OR "young carriers" OR "adolescent carriers" OR "childhood farm" OR youth OR children [Title/Abstract]) ("occupational injuries" OR "occupational injury" OR "occupational accidents" OR "work injuries" OR "work injury" OR "farm injuries" OR "farm injury" OR "construction injuries" OR "construction injury" OR "minery injuries" OR "minery injury" OR "fishing injuries" OR "fishing injury" OR "brickmaking injury" OR "brickmaking injuries" OR "quarrying injuries" OR "quarrying injury" OR "domestic work injury" OR "domestic work injuries" OR "retail injuries" OR "retail injury" OR "landfill injury" OR "landfill injuries" OR "industry injury" OR "industry injuries" OR "service sector injuries" OR "service sector injury"[title/abstract]) 7655 3955 3 # AND # 846 4 ("meta-analysis as topic"[mesh Terms] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR meta-analysis[tiab] OR review[pt] OR review[tiab] NOT (letter[pt] OR editorial[pt] OR comment[pt]) NOT ("animals"[mesh Terms:noexp] NOT "humans"[mesh Terms]) 08786 5 #3 AND #4 36 6 #5 AND "000/0/0"[PDAT] : "04/0/6"[PDAT])) 99 Search string: 6.0.04 (("young worker" OR "young workers" OR "teen workers" OR "adolescent workers" OR "child labour" OR "child workers" OR "children workers" OR "young farm workers" OR "young farmer" OR "young farmers" OR "adolescent farmer" OR "young construction workers" OR "teen construction worker" OR "young miners" OR "adolescent work" OR "child work" OR "domestic work" OR "young restaurant workers" OR "child carrier" OR "child carriers" OR "children carriers" OR "young carriers" OR "adolescent carriers" OR "childhood farm" OR youth OR children [Title/Abstract]) AND ("occupational injuries" OR "occupational injury" OR "occupational accidents" OR "work injuries" OR "work injury" OR "farm injuries" OR "farm injury" OR "construction injuries" OR "construction injury" OR "minery injuries" OR "minery injury" OR "fishing injuries" OR "fishing injury" OR "brickmaking injury" OR "brickmaking injuries" OR "quarrying injuries" OR "quarrying injury" OR "domestic work injury" OR "domestic work injuries" OR "retail injuries" OR "retail injury" OR "landfill injury" OR "landfill injuries" OR "industry injury" OR "industry injuries" OR "service sector injuries" OR "service sector injury"[title/abstract])) AND ("meta-analysis as topic"[mesh Terms] OR meta-analysis[pt] OR meta-analysis[tiab] OR review[pt] OR review[tiab] NOT (letter[pt] OR editorial[pt] OR comment[pt]) NOT ("animals"[mesh
Terms:noexp] NOT "humans"[mesh Terms])) AND "000/0/0"[PDAT] : "04/0/6"[PDAT])) EMBASE via OVID, searched 8.0.04 ("young worker" or "young workers" or "teen workers" or "adolescent workers" or "child labour" or "child workers" or "children workers" or "young farm workers" or "young farmer" or "young farmers" or "adolescent farmer" or "young construction workers" or "teen construction worker" or "young miners" or "adolescent work" or "child work" or "domestic work" or "young restaurant workers" or "child carrier" or "child carriers" or "children carriers" or "young carriers" or "adolescent carriers" or "childhood farm" or youth or children).ti. or ("young worker" or "young workers" or "teen workers" or "adolescent workers" or "child labour" or "child workers" or "children workers" or "young farm workers" or "young farmer" or "young farmers" or "adolescent farmer" or "young construction workers" or "teen construction worker" or "young miners" or "adolescent work" or "child work" or "domestic work" or "young restaurant workers" or "child carrier" or "child carriers" or "children carriers" or "young carriers" or "adolescent carriers" or "childhood farm" or youth or children).ab. ("occupational injuries" or "occupational injury" or "occupational accidents" or "work injuries" or "work injury" or "farm injuries" or "farm injury" or "construction injuries" or "construction injury" or "minery injuries" or "minery injury" or "fishing injuries" or "fishing injury" or "brickmaking injury" or "brickmaking injuries" or "quarrying injuries" or "quarrying injury" or "domestic work injury" or "domestic work injuries" or "retail injuries" or "retail injury" or "landfill injury" or "landfill injuries" or "industry injury" or "industry injuries" or "service sector injuries" or "service sector injury").ti. or ("occupational injuries" or "occupational injury" or "occupational accidents" or "work injuries" or "work injury" or "farm injuries" or "farm injury" or "construction injuries" or "construction injury" or "minery injuries" or "minery injury" or "fishing injuries" or "fishing injury" or "brickmaking injury" or "brickmaking injuries" or "quarrying injuries" or "quarrying injury" or "domestic work injury" or "domestic work injuries" or "retail injuries" or "retail injury" or "landfill injury" or "landfill injuries" or "industry injury" or "industry injuries" or "service sector injuries" or "service sector injury").ab. 640 49 3 # AND # 04 4 ((meta-analysis or review or "systematic review").pt. or metaanalysis.sh. or (meta-analysis or review or "systematic review").ti. or (meta-analysis or review or "systematic review").ab.) not (letter or editorial or comment).pt. not (animals or humans).sh. 049 5 #3 AND #4 333 6 limit #5 to yr="000 -Current" 60 7 limit #6 to exclude medline journals 6
Cochrane Library, searched 4.0.04 "young worker" or "young workers" or "teen workers" or "adolescent workers" or "child labour" or "child workers" or children workers "occupational injuries" or "occupational injury" or "occupational accidents" or "occupational accident" or "work injuries" or "work injury" or "work accident" or "work accidents" 3 # AND # 0 4 Systematic Reviews in OSH by Institute of Work&Health-Canada, searched 8.0.04 "young worker" or "young workers" or "teen workers" or "adolescent workers" or "child labour" AND injuries [all fields] "young worker" or "young workers" or "teen workers" or "adolescent workers" or "child labour" OR injuries [all fields] 0 BAUA literature, searched 8.0.04 young workers 0 young workers AND systematic review Science Direct, searched 8.0.04 This data base has available information from 004 to current. "young worker" OR "young workers" OR "teen workers" OR "adolescent workers" OR "child labour" OR "child workers" OR "children workers" OR youth OR children [Abstract/Title/Keywords] 0780 "occupational injuries" or "occupational injury" or "occupational accidents" or "occupational accident" or "work injuries" or "work injury" or "work accident" or "work accidents" 0 [Abstract/Title/Keywords] 3 # AND # 3 4 review OR systematic review OR meta-analysis [All fields] 377798 5 #3 AND #4 4 6 #5 excluding medline publications by endnote software
5. Selection process: 5. Inclusion criteria: A. According to PICO- question (see.) B. According to inclusion criteria for systematic reviews (see PEROSH OSH Evidence inclusion and classification criteria for Occupational Health Reviews in http://www.perosh.eu/wpcontent/uploads/03/06/perosh-clearinghouse-methods_last-update-march-04.pdf). C. According to inclusion criteria for Occupational Health and Safety topics (see PEROSH OSH Evidence inclusion and classification Criteria for Occupational Health Reviews in http://www.perosh.eu/wp-content/uploads/03/06/perosh-clearinghouse-methods_lastupdate-march-04.pdf). 5. Selection: First step: Based on titles and abstract, two review teams (.Martha Sámano and,.ruth Stephen and Rajeswari S) select the retrieved articles independently resolving discrepancies by discussions. When there were no agreement, a third reviewer participated and decided (Jos Verbeek). Second step: Based on the pre-selected full texts, two review teams (.Martha Sámano and,.ruth Stephen and Rajeswari S) apply the above mentioned inclusion criteria independently resolving discrepancies by discussions or by consensus conference. When there were no agreement, a third reviewer participated and decided (Jos Verbeek).
6. Results: (Adapted from PRISMA 009 Flow Diagram) Include d Eligibility Screenin g Identificatio n
7. Grading of the Systematic Reviews: (Based on the R-AMSTAR Checklist) No. st author / Publication year Overall study assessment (sum of quality scores) Internal validity Comments:.C It is no clear if protocol was published in advance as a strategy to minimize risk of bias. 3.C Key words and/or MESH terms were no provided. 4.D Authors do not specify whether non-english papers were translated or readers sufficiently trained in foreign language. 5.B A list of excluded studies was not provided in principal text nor in a supplemental source nor by authors. 6.C Ranges of relevant features in studies analyzed were no provided. Hartling, L., et al. (004) 3 7.C&D There was no specific recognition about quality of evidence nor its assessment through a characterized instrument. 9. There were no pooled results, authors argue lack of them due to an extensive heterogeneity in interventions, study populations and outcomes. PICO elements could be more precise and clarify that comparison is against no intervention or an alternative intervention, it is not about type of study designs to be included. 0.B&C Graphical aids nor statistical tests were carried out to assess publication bias.. There is no information about possible conflict of interest in primary inclusion studies. Comments: 6.C Ranges of relevant features in studies analyzed were no provided. Rautiainen, R. H., et al. (008). 39 7.D There was recognition of quality of evidence but it was not assessed with a characterized instrument. 0.B&C Graphical aids nor statistical tests were carried out to assess publication bias.. There is no information about possible conflict of interest in primary inclusion studies. Consent for use of personal data I hereby authorize the PEROSH OSH Evidence Group to publish my personal data, as specified in this Search Documentation Form, on the PEROSH website including its database of Systematic Reviews of Occupational Safety and Health. I am aware that my authorized personal data can be consulted by anyone having access to the website using the Internet or any other dedicated network.