Syllabus. Course: Becoming a Reflective Teacher Presenter: Dr. Robert J. Marzano Credits: 3



Similar documents
Syllabus. Required ebook: Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don t Learn

Syllabus. Dr. Calderón connects instructional practice with the Common Core State Standards, and backs up her recommendations with research:

Research Base and Validation Studies on the Marzano Evaluation Model, April Research Base and Validation Studies on the Marzano Evaluation Model

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

A Study of Best Practices in PLATO Learning Online Solutions

WA TPA. Secondary English- Language Arts. Assessment. Handbook. Teacher Performance. Consortium (TPAC) Field Test Pre-Release Handbook September 2011

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

The Art and Science of Teaching the Common Core State Standards

Marzano Center Non-Classroom Instructional Support Member Evaluation Form

NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS

Nutrition and Culinary Arts I. Example SLO

Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

Correlation Map of LEARNING-FOCUSED to Marzano s Evaluation Model

School of Security and Global Studies. Criminal Justice CMRJ698 Comprehensive Exam in Criminal Justice. 8 Week Course

COURSE SYLLABUS PHILOSOPHY 001 CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING SPRING 2012

PBS TeacherLine Course Syllabus 1

Best Practices in Online Teaching 2012

The Early Childhood Portfolio Requirement For the Early Childhood Education Major at Granite State College

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION

What are some effective standards-based classroom assessment practices?

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

LDC Template Task Collection 2.0

NCNSP Design Principle 1: Ready for College

Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist

Dewar College of Education and Human Services Valdosta State University Department of Early Childhood and Special Education

Guide for Evaluating Online Instruction at Santa Rosa Junior College

CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION

NW COLORADO BOCES ALTERNATIVE LICENSURE PROGRAM

Secondary English Language Arts

M.S. in Education Assessment in the Major Report By Dr. Renee Chandler, Program Director Submitted: October 2011

FACULTY PEER ONLINE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS AA

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics

North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction

Oregon Institute of Technology Bachelor of Science Degree in Dental Hygiene Degree Completion Outreach Program

Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation

Using Rounds to Enhance Teacher Interaction and Self Reflection: The Marzano Observational Protocol

>Course Design Examples and Best Practices

COM207: CREATIVE WRITING: FICTION SYLLABUS LECTURE HOURS/CREDITS: 3/3

DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

LIBR 535 Instructional Role of the Librarian Course Syllabus (3)

PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.

SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT MENTOR SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE ASSESSMENT/REFLECTION LOG 2 nd and 3 rd Year Provisional Teachers

Tackling the NEW Teacher Evaluation Guidelines

Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Core Alignment of Summative Assessments to Standards

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning

Strategies for Effective Online Teaching

Fundamentals of Business Administration and Management

Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric

Writing and Presenting a Persuasive Paper Grade Nine

LEARNING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES

International Baccalaureate Diploma Assessment Policy Holy Heart of Mary High School

WRITING SKILLS Course Syllabus

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

I. Students succeed because teachers plan with individual learning results in mind.

How To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District

Standards for Quality Online Teaching

MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS

Master of Arts in Teaching/Science Education Master of Arts in Teaching/Mathematics Education

Criteria for Approval of Online Providers and Courses to Satisfy UC Subject ( a-g ) Requirements

SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Cambridge International Certificate in Educational Leadership 6247 Cambridge International Diploma in Educational Leadership 6248

Common Core Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects

Develop Research Skills Emphasize how research informs almost all writing by crafting assignments that require students to draw on traditional and

Title of Course (45 hours): Building Academic Vocabulary

BOSTON UNIVERSITY Course Syllabus: DESIGN THINKING FOR MULTIPLATFORM MARKETING

ASSESSMENT 5: Masters Degree ECE Summative Assessment Project, Thesis or Paper

ASSESSING THE ONLINE LEARNER. Rena Palloff and Keith Pratt

Campus Instructional Consulting Franklin Hall 004, , Page 1

MGT 367 Human Resource Management Spring 2015 Online

Temple University Fox School of Business MS Information Technology And Cyber Security MIS5201 SYLLABUS

MARZANO RESEARCH LABORATORY TINA H. BOOGREN

Course: HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT Professor: MADELINE FERRARO, ESQ.

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Special Education Program

Principles of Entrepreneurship

Transcription:

Syllabus Course: Becoming a Reflective Teacher Presenter: Dr. Robert J. Marzano Credits: 3 Required ebook: Becoming a Reflective Teacher (Robert Marzano with Tina Boogren, Tammy Heflebower, Jessica McIntyre, and Debra Pickering, Marzano Research Laboratory, 2012) Course Overview In this course, Dr. Robert J. Marzano, CEO of the Marzano Research Lab, posits teaching as a collection of skills that benefit from practice and reflection. He assists participants in developing those skills by reflecting on their personal strengths and weaknesses in relation to nine critical design questions, setting growth goals, engaging in focused practice to meet those goals, and soliciting feedback from students and colleagues. Participants will learn from a workshop setting, classroom footage, interviews, and models of reflection-in-process how to use systematic reflection to improve their practice in order to affect student achievement. Course Objectives After completing this course, educators will know: Nine critical design questions and their elements Methods for systematizing the reflection process How to set and pursue specific growth goals After completing this course, educators will apply the following skills: Conduct a complete self-audit of their practice Articulate growth goals

Pursue growth goals through the establishing of protocols and focused strategies Solicit feedback from students and colleagues Improve their practice through the reflection process Unit 1: Research and Theory In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano establishes why teachers should systematically reflect on their practice. He reviews the history of reflection, as well as the supporting research, and elicits from the workshop participants their experience with reflection and its benefits for them and their students. Unit Objectives The history of reflective practice The research that supports reflective practice The benefits of reflective practice Support the practice of reflection Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of their reflective practices to date ebook: Research and Theory Participants read chapter 1, Research and Theory, in their ebook and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 2: Routine and Content Strategies and Behaviors In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano and the workshop participants delve into the nine critical design questions that can inform teachers reflective practice. They explore how to reflect on routine events and learning content.

Unit Objectives The first five critical design questions and their elements Reflect on their practice by answering these questions: o What will I do to establish and communicate learning goals, track student progress, and celebrate success? o What will I do to establish and maintain classroom rules and procedures? o What will I do to help students effectively interact with new knowledge? o What will I do to help students practice and deepen their understanding of new knowledge? o What will I do to help students generate and test hypotheses about new knowledge? Unit 3: On-the-Spot Strategies and Behaviors In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano and the workshop participants study the four remaining critical design questions. They consider how to reflect on their on-the-spot behaviors. Unit Objective The four remaining critical design questions and their elements Reflect on their practice by answering these questions: o What will I do to engage students?

o What will I do to recognize and acknowledge adherence or lack of adherence to rules and procedures? o What will I do to establish and maintain effective relationships with students? o What will I do to communicate high expectations for all students? ebook: Having a Model of Effective Teaching Participants read chapter 2, Having a Model of Effective Teaching, in their ebook and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 4: Setting Growth Goals In this unit, participants consider their practice in relation to three stages of progress: cognitive, shaping, and autonomous. They learn to assess different skills as beginning, developing, applying, and innovating, finally conducting a complete self-audit that leads to the articulation of specific growth goals. Unit Objectives The cognitive, shaping, and autonomous phrases of their practice Where to modify their practice to progress from beginning to developing to applying to innovating The parameters of growth goals Assess aspects of their practice as being in the cognitive, shaping, or the autonomous phase Assess aspects of their practice from beginning to innovating Conduct a complete self-audit Establish growth goals

ebook: Growth Goals Participants read chapter 3, Setting Growth Goals, in their ebook and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 5: Engaging in Focused Practice In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano and participants explore the processes that lead to achievement of growth goals. They discuss how to determine protocols and pursue specific strategies. Unit Objective Processes by which to achieve growth goals Establish protocols to help them achieve their growth goals Focus on particular strategies relevant to their growth goals ebook: Focused Practice Participants read chapter 4, Engaging in Focused Practice, in their ebooks and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 6: Receiving Focused Feedback In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano assists participants in developing methods for gathering focused feedback on their practice through such strategies as student surveys and the analysis of student data. Unit Objective

Assorted methods for receiving focused feedback Develop student surveys Analyze student data ebook: Focused Feedback Participants read chapter 5, Receiving Focused Feedback, in their ebooks and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 7: Observing and Discussing Teaching In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano and participants explore different methods for observing and discussing teaching, including interacting around videos, creating coaching-colleagues relationships, and facilitating instructional rounds. Unit Objective Different methods for facilitating observation and discussion of teaching Have productive conversations about teaching using videos as a source Create coaching-colleagues relationships Structure instructional rounds

ebook: Observation and Discussion Participants read chapter 6, Observing and Discussing Teaching, in their ebook and respond to reflection prompts. Unit 8: Facilitated Reflection In this unit, Dr. Robert J. Marzano and his colleague Tina Boogren assist the workshop participants in reflecting on their practice by debriefing video segments of their teaching in practice. They discuss where in the teacher s practice they see alignment to the elements of the nine critical design questions and where there might be room for growth. Unit Objective What reflection-in-action can look like Student Learning Outcome Deepen and extend their reflection practice Presenter s Bio Dr. Robert J. Marzano is the cofounder and CEO of Marzano Research Laboratory in Denver, Colorado. Throughout his forty years in the field of education, he has become a speaker, trainer, and author of more than thirty books and 150 articles on topics such as instruction, assessment, writing, and implementing standards, cognition, effective leadership, and school intervention. His books include: The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction, Making Standards Useful in the Classroom, District Leadership That Works: Striking the Right Balance, Designing and Teaching Learning Goals and Objectives, and On Excellence in Teaching. His practical translations of the most current research and theory into classroom strategies are internationally known and widely practiced by both teachers and administrators. He received a bachelor s degree from Iona College in New York, a master s degree from Seattle University, and a doctorate from the University of Washington.

Methods of Instruction: Videos (presentations consisting of lecture, interviews, and classroom footage) Text (units based on required reading) Reflection questions (open-ended questions at intervals throughout the video presentations where participants are asked to reflect on the course content, their own practice, and their intentions for their practice) Quizzes (selected-response quizzes to assess understanding of the video presentations and ebook content) Discussion forum (prompts after each unit that engage participants in online dialogue with their cohorts) Midterm (a project intended to get teachers to begin to develop their practice by putting to work what they have learned) Final (a project that enables educators to reflect on their practice and assess their students work through the lens of what they have learned) All steps listed under each topic must be completed to receive credit for the course. No partial credit is given. Plagiarism Policy KDS recognizes plagiarism as a serious academic offense. Plagiarism is the dishonest passing off of someone else s work as one s own and includes failing to cite sources for others ideas, copying material from books or the Internet, and handing in work written by someone other than the participant. Plagiarism will result in a failing grade and may have additional consequences. For more information about plagiarism and guidelines for appropriate citation, consult plagiarism.org. KDS Rubric for Letter Grade Courses: 3 Credits Percentage of Course Credit Reflection questions 25% Quizzes 15%

Midterm 25% Final 35% A: 90-100 points B: 80-89 points C: 70-79 points F: Fewer than 70 points Component Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Quizzes (6 points) (9 points) (12 points) (15 points) Quizzes: Quizzes: Quizzes: Quizzes: 0-40% correct 60% correct 80% correct 100% correct Reflection questions (10 points) (15 points) (20 points) (25 points) Reflection questions: Reflection questions: Reflection questions: Reflection questions: includes no content from the course in his or her responses does not address the questions posed includes some content from the course, usually appropriate, in his or her responses answers the questions directly, includes appropriate content from the course in his or her responses makes thoughtful provides rich detail from the content of the course in his or her responses makes his or her responses to the

not always fully comments in direct response to the questions questions personally meaningful Midterm (10 points) (15 points) (20 points) (25 points) Final (20 points) (25 points) (30 points) (35 points) Requirements of Assignment: Requirements of Assignment : Requirements of Assignment: Requirements of Assignment: -The assignment is substantially incomplete -Many requirements met, but a few pieces are missing, while others are underdeveloped e.g., missing reflection or rubric or scant reflection and vague rubric has fulfilled all the requirements of the assignment has fulfilled all the requirements of the assignment with marked creativity, intelligence, and thoughtfulness Form: Form: Form: Form: - Plentiful grammatical mistakes -Confusing content -Missing documentation of sources -Distracting grammatical errors -Confusing content -Inconsistent or missing documentation of sources has written a solid essay or lesson plan, including appropriate detail and in an interesting style -No grammatical errors -Eloquent expression -Proper citation of sources

Content: Content: Content: Content: -No main idea and/or main idea is irrelevant to the assignment -The main idea is not clear in the opening paragraph -Essay is organized around a thesis or main idea -Essay is organized around a thesis or main idea -No apparent paragraph organization -No supporting evidence for supporting ideas -No evidence in the lesson plan in objectives, activities, or assessments that the learner comprehends the course content -Relevance to main idea of supporting paragraphs is not always clear -Supporting ideas are only minimally illustrated by examples or quotes -The lesson plan does not show enough evidence that the learner understands the course content. Objectives and/or activities and/or assessments only vaguely apply to the course content -Paragraphs are organized around ideas relevant to the main idea -Supporting ideas are evident, and usually include illustrating examples and/or quotes -The lesson plan shows evidence of understanding of the course content in its objectives, activities, and/or assessments -Paragraphs are organized around ideas relevant to the main idea -Supporting points are illustrated with examples and/or quotes -Lesson plan shows evidence of a deep understanding of course content and participant uses that understanding to create opportunities for students to authentically show what they have learned KDS Pass/Fail Option: 3 credits Passing Requirements Grade of C or higher