How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California



Similar documents
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

Case 3:14-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

Case4:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

DATED: April 29, 2002 BARRY NOVACK

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

Case 3:14-cv MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY CENTRAL DISTRICT STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 14-cv-1358 v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Case 2:11-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 12/21/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:15-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. No. Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT I. SUMMARY

Case 1:10-cv JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1 :09-cv CKK Document 6 Filed 06/18/2009 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:06-cv JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15

AGENT AGREEMENT. I. Agent s Obligations

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

Case 3:08-cv JSW Document 5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Plaintiffs, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Real Estate Agent Website Linking Agreement

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff [PLAINTIFF] hereby sues the Defendants, [DEFENDANT #1], [DEFENDANT INTRODUCTION

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff Endeavor MeshTech, Inc. ( Plaintiff or Endeavor ), by and through its

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

INTRODUCTION. 1. The State of Maine and Securities Administrator (hereinafter collectively

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/31/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case3:08-cv EDL Document72 Filed04/02/10 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2014

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case3:13-cv JST Document27 Filed11/27/13 Page1 of 14

COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 2:13-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/13 Page 1 of 10

- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:15-cv MO Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 8

DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION. In Re: Bankruptcy No (Chapter 11) Filed Electronically

Case: 3:14-cv bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"), for its Complaint alleges:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho

3 JON M. ICHINAGA Supervising Deputy Attorney General '4 MAURICE R. JOURDANE

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER] 6 7 Attorneys for [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] [CLIENT S NAME] California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME] [PLAINTIFF S NAME], a California corporation, Plaintiff, [DEFENDANT(S) NAME(S)], a California corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. v. UNLIMITED JURISDICTION Case No. [PLEADING TITLE] COMPLAINT FOR COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION 16

1 Plaintiff [NAME], as its complaint against Defendants [DEFENDANTS NAMES] 2 alleges as follows: 3 PARTIES 4 1. Plaintiff [NAME] is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the 5 State of California, with its principal place of business in [CITY], California. Plaintiff is 6 qualified to do business in the State of California. 7 2. Defendant [NAME] is, and at all material times was, a corporation organized and 8 existing under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business in [CITY], California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 California. 3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Does 1 through 50, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues the Doe Defendants by fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when they have been ascertained. 4. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named Defendants designated as Does 1 through 50, inclusive, were legally, equitably, and/or otherwise responsible for the acts, omissions, errors, tortious conduct, and/or occurrences herein alleged and that injuries and/or damages as herein alleged were proximately caused by these fictitiously named Defendants. 5. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants herein was, and at all times relevant to this action is, the agent, employee, representing partner, supervisor, managing agent, or joint venturer of the remaining Defendants and was acting within the course and scope of that relationship. Plaintiff is further informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants herein gave consent to, ratified, and authorized the acts alleged herein of the remaining Defendants. Defendants are sued both in their own right and on the basis of respondeat superior. 6. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each and every of the acts and omissions alleged herein were performed by, and/or attributable to, all Defendants, each acting as agents and/or employees, and/or under the direction and control of each of the other 1 [PLEADING TITLE] 17

1 Defendants, and that said acts and failures to act were within the course and scope of said 2 agency, employment and/or direction and control. 3 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 4 (Common Law Unfair Competition) 5 7. Plaintiff incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein paragraphs 6 to, inclusive. 7 8. [PLAINTIFF S NAME] is a business started in [YEAR]. Plaintiff owns and 8 operates a [DESCRIBE BUSINESS OPERATIONS]. Plaintiff sells its [PRODUCT] at California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [LOCATION, e.g., its own store, through retailers] and throughout California and nationwide. Plaintiff has developed a reputation for producing high-quality [PRODUCT]. 9. As a family-run business, Plaintiff decided to adopt [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] as its label and trademark. The name [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] became a distinct and unusual trademark in the [DESCRIBE TYPE OF BUSINESS] business. Since at least [MONTH, DAY, YEAR], Plaintiff has been using the name [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] in connection with the advertising, marketing and sale of [PRODUCT]. 10. Plaintiff has advertised heavily to market and sell its [PRODUCTS], both in California and throughout the country. Consumers recognize the [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] name and mark as symbolizing a high-quality [PRODUCT] from a particular source, namely, [PLAINTIFF S NAME]. 11. In [YEAR], many years after Plaintiff adopted the [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] name and mark, Defendant [NAME] began to sell [PRODUCT] under the [DEFENDANT S PRODUCT NAME ALL CAPS]. Defendant s use of the name [DEFENDANT S PRODUCT NAME ALL CAPS] is likely to cause confusion and has caused confusion among consumers as to whether [DEFENDANT S NAME] s [PRODUCTS] are made by, sponsored or approved by Plaintiff [NAME] or that [DEFENDANT S NAME] s [OPERATION] is sponsored by or affiliated with [PLAINTIFF S NAME]. 12. [DEFENDANT S NAME] s actions alleged above are likely to cause mistake, 2 [PLEADING TITLE] 18

1 confusion and/or deceive the public as to the affiliation with, sponsorship by, approval by or 2 connection between Plaintiff and Defendant and thus constitute unfair competition, or passing 3 off, under common law. 4 13. As a result of [DEFENDANT S NAME] s actions alleged in this complaint, 5 Plaintiff has suffered and is likely to suffer in the future monetary damages due to loss of sales 6 and loss of goodwill. 7 14. Unless and until restrained by this Court, Defendant [NAME] will continue 8 unlawfully and without permission to use Plaintiff s [FAMILY NAME TRADEMARK ALL California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CAPS] mark on Defendant s [PRODUCTS], which will cause Plaintiff irreparable injury for which monetary damages will be inadequate, including without limitation damage to its trademark, loss of goodwill, and loss of the ability to move into new markets. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff [NAME] prays for the following relief: 1. That Defendant [NAME], its officers, directors, agents, employees, representatives and all persons acting or claiming to act on its behalf or under its direction and control, and all persons acting in concert or participation with [DEFENDANT S NAME], and who receive notice of the order, be enjoined during the pendency of this action and perpetually from (1) using the designation [PLAINTIFF S TRADEMARK ALL CAPS] or any other name, mark or designation that is a colorable imitation of or confusingly similar to [PLAINTIFF S TRADEMARK ALL CAPS], whether alone or in combination with any other name or mark, in connection with the manufacture, advertising, marketing or sale of [PRODUCT], [PRODUCT]-related products, [PLAINTIFF S OPERATIONS, e.g., stores], or any other good, product or service that neither originates from nor is authorized by Plaintiff [NAME]; goodwill; and 2. For damages according to proof at trial, including for lost profits and loss of 3 [PLEADING TITLE] 19

1 3. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. 2 3 DATED: 4 [LAW FIRM NAME] 5 California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: 4 [PLEADING TITLE] [ATTORNEY NAME] Attorneys for [CLIENT S NAME] [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] 20

1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER] 6 7 Attorneys for [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] [CLIENT S NAME] California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY NAME] [PLAINTIFF S NAME], a California corporation, Plaintiff, [DEFENDANT(S) NAME(S)]; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. v. UNLIMITED JURISDICTION Case No. COMPLAINT COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AND COVENANT NOT TO SOLICIT EMPLOYEES OF FORMER EMPLOYER 21

1 Plaintiff [NAME], as its complaint against Defendants [DEFENDANT S NAMES] 2 alleges as follows: 3 PARTIES 4 1. Plaintiff [NAME] is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the 5 State of California, with its principal place of business in [CITY], California. [PLAINTIFF 6 NAME] is qualified to do business in the State of California. 7 2. Defendant [NAME] is, and at all material times was, an individual who is a 8 resident of the State of California, and the County of [COUNTY]. California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Does 1 through 50, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues the Doe Defendants by fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to show their true names and capacities when they have been ascertained. 4. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named Defendants designated as Does 1 through 50, inclusive, were legally, equitably, and/or otherwise responsible for the acts, omissions, errors, tortious conduct, and/or occurrences herein alleged and that injuries and/or damages as herein alleged were proximately caused by these fictitiously named Defendants. 5. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants herein was, and at all times relevant to this action is, the agent, employee, representing partner, supervisor, managing agent, or joint venturer of the remaining Defendants and was acting within the course and scope of that relationship. Plaintiff is further informed, believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants herein gave consent to, ratified, and authorized the acts alleged herein of the remaining Defendants. Defendants are sued both in their own right and on the basis of respondeat superior. 6. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges that each and every of the acts and omissions alleged herein were performed by, and/or attributable to, all Defendants, each acting as agents and/or employees, and/or under the direction and control of each of the other Defendants, and that said acts and failures to act were within the course and scope of said 1 COMPLAINT 22

1 agency, employment and/or direction and control. 2 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 3 7. Plaintiff is a [DESCRIBE, e.g., software company]. 4 8. From [DATE] to [DATE], Defendant was employed by Plaintiff as [TITLE]. On 5 [DATE], Defendant resigned from Plaintiff and took the position of Vice President of Sales of 6 [NAME], one of Plaintiff s principal competitors in the market for [PRODUCT]. 7 9. Defendant s employment with Plaintiff was governed by a written Employment 8 Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference. California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant s written Employment Agreement contains the following provision: [QUOTE NON-SOLICITATION PROVISION OF AGREEMENT] 10. Almost immediately after Defendant resigned from Plaintiff and took the position of Vice President of Sales of [NAME], Defendant began to directly and indirectly solicit Plaintiff s sales representatives and employees to work for [NAME] in violation of the nonsolicitation provision of his Employment Agreement. 11. Despite repeated demands that Defendant cease and desist from soliciting Plaintiff s employees in violation of his Employment Agreement, Defendant has continued to do so. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Contract Non-Solicitation of Employees) 12. Plaintiff incorporates by reference as though fully set forth herein paragraphs to, inclusive. 13. The Employment Agreement is a valid and existing contract. 14. Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by it to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement. 15. Defendant breached the Employment Agreement within one year after his termination from employment by directly or indirectly, wrongfully, unfairly or in an anticompetitive manner, soliciting, inducing, or hiring, or attempting to solicit, induce or hire, Plaintiff s employees, consultants or representatives to terminate, reduce or materially alter such 2 COMPLAINT 23

1 employee s, consultant s, agent s or other representative s relationship with, or otherwise cease 2 negotiations and/or business activity with Plaintiff. 3 16. As a result of Defendant s breach of the non-solicitation clause of the 4 Employment Agreement, Plaintiff has suffered actual damages, including lost profits and loss of 5 goodwill, in an amount to be proven at trial. 6 17. Unless and until Defendant is enjoined and restrained by order of this Court, 7 Defendant will continue his wrongful conduct in violation of the non-solicitation covenant 8 contained in the Employment Agreement. Unless and until enjoined, the Defendant s wrongful California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 conduct will cause great and irreparable injury to Plaintiff and its business in that it will continue to lose employees and customers to Defendant and suffer injury to its goodwill. 18. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law for the injuries currently being suffered or which are threatened in that Defendant will continue to compete with Plaintiff in violation of the covenant not to compete and Plaintiff would be required to maintain a multiplicity of judicial proceedings to protect its interests. goodwill; PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff [NAME] prays for the following relief: 1. For actual damages for breach of contract, including lost profits and loss of 2. For preliminary and permanent injunctive relief pursuant to Sections 526 and 527 of the California Code of Civil Procedure enjoining Defendant, and his officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all other persons who are in active concert or participation with him, and who receive actual notice of the order, from continuing to directly or indirectly, wrongfully, unfairly or in an anti-competitive manner, solicit, induce, or hire, or attempt to solicit, induce or hire, Plaintiff s employees, consultants or representatives to terminate, reduce or materially alter such employee s, consultant s, agent s or other representative s relationship with, or otherwise cease negotiations and/or business activity with Plaintiff, for a period of one 3 COMPLAINT 24

1 year after Defendant s termination of employment in breach of the non-solicitation covenant 2 contained in the Employment Agreement; 3 3. For pre-judgment interest at the legal rate [OR at the contract rate] commencing California Business Litigation Forms - Sample Exemplars 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 on the date of breach; 4. [IF THE CONTRACT CONTAINS A PREVAILING PARTY ATTORNEYS FEE PROVISION] For Plaintiff s reasonable attorneys fees; 5. For its costs of suit; and, 6. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. DATED: By: 4 COMPLAINT [LAW FIRM NAME] [ATTORNEY NAME] Attorneys for [CLIENT S NAME] [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] 25