INTRODUCTION. At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless. 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was



Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. INFORMATION. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Jose L. Linares INFORMATION

2004R01432/JWD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDICTMENT COUNT ONE BACKGROUND

COUNT 1. The SPECIAL AUGUST 2012 GRAND JURY charges: a. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. was a Chicago-based

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

v. : Criminal Number: IRINA ZELIKSON : Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1349 and 982(a)(7) I N F O R M A T I O N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS (Kansas City, Kansas, Docket)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

) (28 u.s.c. $ 2a6l(c))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cr AJS Document 1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE BY-LAWS OF THE INVESTMENT DEALERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA AND GERALD DANNY STEFANIUK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N D I C T M E N T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, the.

CASE 0:14-cr JRT-JSM Document 1 Filed 08/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT DISTRJCT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : DATE FILED: I N F O R M A T I O N COUNT ONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. ) No. ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

09 Cr. COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud) The United States Attorney charges: Relevant Persons and Entities

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Filed: Violations: 15 U.S.C U.S.C.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNT ONE (Securities Fraud)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION INDICTMENT COUNTS ONE THROUGH SIX. The Scheme to Defraud

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CR-LENARD

INDICTMENT. The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, COUNT 1 (Conspiracy) 18 U.S.C At various times relevant to this Indictment:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Minnesota

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY I N D I C T M E N T. The Grand Jury, in and for the District of New Jersey,

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. This case involves widespread fraudulent conduct orchestrated by Shkreli from at

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT INDICTMENT GENERAL ALLEGATIONS. The Medicare Program

COUNT ONE. Conspiracy to Commit Bank Robbery. 1. On or about March 29, 2013, in the Southern

Case 2:13-cv DS Document 1 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) No. 14 CR vs. ) Violation: Title 18, United States Code, ) Section 1347 CHARLES DEHAAN ) COUNT ONE.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N F O R M A T I O N

Case 1:05-cr BBM-ECS Document 9 Filed 07/05/2005 Page 1 of 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

I N D I C T M E N T. COUNT ONE (Racketeering) (Defendant Bergrin) The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, The Enterprise

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 3:14-cr AWT Document 39 Filed 08/05/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT y. FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO.

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT FOR MAIL FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Hon. Stanley R. Chesler. 18 u.s.c u.s.c u.s.c. 2

Hon. The defendant having waived in open court prosecution by Indictment, and the defendant having waived any defenses in open court based upon any

Case 2:13-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/04/2013 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

BORIS SOKHA : Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 and Title 26, United States Code, Section 7201 I N F O R M A T I O N

Case 3:11-cv P Document 1 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAR FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORG!Pf'~ ATLANTA DIVISION. No. 1 : 1 5..

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. COUNT ONB Wire Fraud Conspiracy 18 u.s.c.

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 SEATTLE DIVISION

TITLE III CROWDFUNDING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I N D I C T M E N T

Case 1:07-cr RWS-CCH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR.THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Case 0:13-cv WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 4:15-cv A Document 1 Filed 06/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) ) ) ) No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INDICTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, v. Civil File No. 2:13-cv Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No (JMR) The United States of America, by and through its attorneys,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DMSION ) ) Filed: ) ) CRIMINAL INFORMATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

PENNY STOCK RISK DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT

* Criminal No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Market Timing Schemes

2:13-cv NGE-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/10/13 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COUNT ONE. THE SPECIAL AUGUST GRAND JURY charges:

The Grand Jury in and for the District of New Jersey, COUNT ONE. (Conspiracy To Commit Mail Fraud)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 11-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Transcription:

EC:TF F. #2004R01040 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I N D I C T M E N T - against - Cr. No. (T. 15, U.S.C., STEVEN INGRASSIA, 78j(b) and 78ff; SLAVA VOLMAN, T. 18, U.S.C., NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, 371, 982(a)(1), 982(b), JEFFREY BASSIN, 1956(h), CARL CUNZIO, 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), JOHN FLANAGAN, 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), OTTO KOZAK, 2 and 3551 et seq.) ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X THE GRAND JURY CHARGES: otherwise stated: INTRODUCTION At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless I. The Brokerage Firm 1. Donald & Co. Securities Inc. ("Donald & Co.") was a broker-dealer of securities registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) and the National Association of Securities Dealers ( NASD ). Donald & Co. s principal office was located in Tinton Falls, New Jersey. 2. In or about September 1998, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others with whom they had previously worked at another broker-dealer, joined Donald &

Co. Initially, the group worked in Donald & Co. s branch office located in New York, New York. 3. In or about May 1999, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, entered into a written agreement with Donald & Co. to open a branch office of the firm in Garden City, New York (the Garden City Branch ). The Garden City Branch was located at 990 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New York. 4. The Garden City Branch was subsequently registered with the NASD as an office of supervisory jurisdiction, which permitted it to engage in public offerings and private placements of securities, and to act as a market maker in securities. A market maker facilitates trading in a security by setting price quotations and holding itself out as prepared to buy and sell certain quantities of the security for its own account. The Garden City Branch acted as a market maker in various securities. It also offered a variety of brokerage services to retail customers. 5. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, contributed capital for the creation of the Garden City Branch, as well as for a proprietary trading account for the Garden City Branch in the name of Odyssey Capital LLC. 6. The Garden City Branch employed stock brokers, also referred to as registered representatives, who purchased 2

and sold securities for the firm s customers. The branch also employed traders, who purchased and sold securities for the firm s own accounts and assisted the firm in making markets in securities. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, managed the Garden City Branch, and they exercised supervisory responsibility over the branch s staff, including its registered representatives. 7. On or about July 24, 2002, Donald & Co. ceased operations because of insufficient capital, and the Garden City Branch was forced to cease operations. II. The Defendants A. Principals 8. The defendant STEVEN INGRASSIA was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately September 1998 through July 2002. In addition, INGRASSIA was an undisclosed principal of the Garden City Branch. 9. The defendant SLAVA VOLMAN was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately September 1998 through July 2002. In addition, VOLMAN was an undisclosed principal of the Garden City Branch. B. Registered Representatives 10. The defendant NICHOLAS ANTONELLI was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately October 2000 through July 2002. 3

11. The defendant JEFFREY BASSIN was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately September 1998 through July 2002. 12. The defendant CARL CUNZIO was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately October 2000 through July 2002. 13. The defendant JOHN FLANAGAN was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately October 2001 through July 2002. 14. The defendant OTTO KOZAK was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately February 1999 through December 2001. 15. The defendant ROBERT KOZAK was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately February 1999 through December 2001. 16. The defendant PATRICK MCFADDEN was a registered representative at Donald & Co. from approximately January 2002 through May 2002. III. The Fraudulent Scheme 17. From approximately May 1999 through July 2002, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK, ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, together with others, devised and carried out a scheme to manipulate the market price 4

of stocks that traded on the NASDAQ Small Capitalization stock market and Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board market ( NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board ), and engaged in other deceptive sales practices with respect to retail customers. 18. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, arranged for the Garden City Branch to acquire control over large blocks of stock and stock warrants of various companies (the House Stocks ) through, among other means, private placements, as compensation under consulting agreements, and through purchases in the open market. 19. The House Stocks included, among others, the following stocks: a. Elec Communications ( Elec ), a telecommunications company whose main office was located in New Rochelle, New York. Elec s shares were registered with the SEC, and its stock was traded on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol ELEC. b. The Classica Group, Inc. ( Classica ), a company whose main office was located in Lakeland, New Jersey. Classica initially marketed itself as an importer and producer of specialty cheeses and Italian foods. It also marketed microwave technology purportedly capable of killing bacteria in food items. Classica s shares were registered with the SEC, and its stock was traded on the NASDAQ OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol TCGI. 5

20. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK, ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, together with others, sought to inflate artificially and to maintain artificially the price of the House Stocks. The defendants, together with others, engaged in, and caused others to engage in, a number of manipulative and deceptive acts and practices, including, but not limited to (a) making materially false and fraudulent representations to retail clients in order to induce those clients to purchase House Stocks; (b) using high pressure and deceptive sales tactics; (c) making unauthorized trades in client accounts; (d) refusing to execute customer sale orders of House Stocks; (e) executing customer sale orders of House Stocks only if the sales could be crossed, or matched with a purchase of the same stock by another client; and (f) paying and accepting excessive, undisclosed commissions and payoffs for inducing customers to purchase House Stocks. 21. None of these manipulative and deceptive acts and practices and unlawful sales techniques was disclosed to customers at the time of their purchases of House Stocks or thereafter because disclosure would have revealed the undesirability of the House Stocks and would have jeopardized the success of the fraudulent scheme. 6

IV. Laundering of Fraud Proceeds 22. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK and ROBERT KOZAK, together with others, laundered the proceeds of the securities fraud scheme with the intent to promote their fraudulent scheme and to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership and control of such proceeds. 23. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, laundered money by accumulating profits from the fraudulent scheme in accounts in the name of Odyssey Capital, including accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank, and then using the profits to promote the fraudulent scheme by, for example, purchasing additional securities to sell to customers and hiring additional personnel to promote the securities. 24. The defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK and ROBERT KOZAK, together with others, also laundered money by accumulating profits from the fraudulent scheme in accounts at Donald & Co. in their own names and in the names of nominees, such as friends and relatives, and then transferring the proceeds in these accounts to other accounts. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud) 25. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24 are repeated and incorporated as if fully set forth in this 7

paragraph. 26. In or about and between May 1999 and July 2002, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK, ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, together with others, did knowingly and willfully conspire to use and employ manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances, directly and indirectly, in violation of Rule 10b-5 of the Rules and Regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5), and, directly and indirectly, to (a) employ devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud; (b) make untrue statements of material fact and omit to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (c) engage in acts, practices, and courses of business which would and did operate as a fraud and deceit upon the investing public, in connection with purchases and sales of the House Stocks and other securities, and by use of the instrumentalities of interstate commerce and the mails, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff. 27. In furtherance of the conspiracy, and to effect its objectives, within the Eastern District of New York and 8

elsewhere, the defendants, together with their co-conspirators, committed and caused to be committed, among others, the following: OVERT ACTS a. In or about May 1999, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, executed an agreement with Donald & Co. to create the Garden City Branch. b. On or about March 21, 2000, the defendant STEVEN INGRASSIA made false and misleading statements to a Donald & Co. customer concerning Classica s stock. c. On or about April 14, 2000, the defendant JEFFREY BASSIN refused to execute an order to sell approximately 5,000 shares of Elec stock in the account of a Donald & Co. customer. d. On or about July 14, 2000, the defendant ROBERT KOZAK made false and misleading statements to a Donald & Co. customer concerning Elec s stock. e. On or about June 8, 2001, the defendant NICHOLAS ANTONELLI made false and misleading statements to a Donald & Co. customer concerning Classica s stock. f. On or about July 20, 2001, the defendant OTTO KOZAK made false and misleading statements to a Donald & Co. customer concerning Classica s stock. 9

g. On or about October 11, 2001, the defendant CARL CUNZIO made false and misleading statements to a Donald & Co. customer concerning Classica s stock. h. On or about November 8, 2001, the defendant JOHN FLANAGAN caused a purchase of approximately 10,000 shares of Classica stock to be made in the account of a Donald & Co. customer. i. On or about April 29, 2002, the defendant PATRICK McFADDEN caused a sale of approximately 10,000 shares of Classica stock to be made in the account of a Donald & Co. customer. j. On or about June 11, 2002, the defendant SLAVA VOLMAN caused a purchase of approximately 1,000 shares of Classica stock to be made in the account of a Donald & Co. customer. seq.) (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 3551 et COUNT TWO (Securities Fraud - Elec) 28. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24 and 27 are repeated and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 29. In or about and between January 2000 and July 2002, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants STEVEN 10

INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK, ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, together with others, did knowingly and willfully use and employ manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances, directly and indirectly, in violation of Rule 10b-5 of the Rules and Regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5), in that the defendants, together with others, did knowingly and willfully, directly and indirectly, (a) employ devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud; (b) make untrue statements of material fact and omit to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (c) engage in acts, practices, and courses of business which would and did operate as a fraud and deceit upon the investing public, in connection with purchases and sales of the securities of Elec, and by use of the instrumentalities of interstate commerce and the mails. (Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 3551 et seq.) COUNT THREE (Securities Fraud - Classica) 30. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24 and 27 are repeated and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 11

31. In or about and between January 2000 and July 2002, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, NICHOLAS ANTONELLI, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK, ROBERT KOZAK and PATRICK MCFADDEN, together with others, did knowingly and willfully use and employ manipulative and deceptive devices and contrivances, directly and indirectly, in violation of Rule 10b-5 of the Rules and Regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5), in that the defendants, together with others, did knowingly and willfully, directly and indirectly, (a) employ devices, schemes, and artifices to defraud; (b) make untrue statements of material fact and omit to state material facts necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (c) engage in acts, practices, and courses of business which would and did operate as a fraud and deceit upon the investing public, in connection with purchases and sales of the securities of Classica, and by use of the instrumentalities of interstate commerce and the mails. (Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff; Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2 and 3551 et seq.) 12

COUNT FOUR (Money Laundering Conspiracy) 32. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24, 26, 27, 29 and 31 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 33. In or about and between May 1999 and July 2002, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA, SLAVA VOLMAN, JEFFREY BASSIN, CARL CUNZIO, JOHN FLANAGAN, OTTO KOZAK and ROBERT KOZAK, together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire to conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate and foreign commerce which in fact involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, to wit: securities fraud, knowing that the property involved in such financial transactions represented proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, (a) with the intent to promote the carrying on of the specified unlawful activity, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), and (b) knowing that the transactions were designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership and control of such proceeds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i). 3551 et seq.) (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(h) and 13

COUNTS FIVE THROUGH THIRTEEN (Money Laundering) 34. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24, 26, 27, 29 and 31 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 35. On or about the dates set forth below, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, defendants STEVEN INGRASSIA and SLAVA VOLMAN, together with others, knowing that the property involved in financial transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, did knowingly and intentionally conduct and attempt to conduct financial transactions affecting interstate and foreign commerce which in fact involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, to wit, securities fraud, (a) with the intent to promote the carrying on of the specified unlawful activity, and (b) knowing that the transactions were designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, and the control of such proceeds, in that the defendants transferred and caused to be transferred funds by check from Odyssey Capital s Chase Manhattan accounts in Carle Place, New York, in the approximate amounts listed below: COUNT DATE AMOUNT RECIPIENT BANK 5 1/3/00 $200,000 Summit Bank 6 1/25/00 $30,000 Fleet Bank 7 2/1/00 $250,000 Fleet Bank 14

COUNT DATE AMOUNT RECIPIENT BANK 8 3/21/00 $63,000 Summit Bank 9 3/31/00 $85,000 Summit Bank 10 4/11/00 $250,000 Summit Bank 11 4/24/00 $149,000 Summit Bank 12 6/20/00 $115,000 Summit Bank 13 7/11/00 $113,000 Summit Bank (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a)(1)(A)(i), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), 2 and 3551 et seq.) FIRST CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION (Counts One, Two and Three) 36. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24, 27, 27, 29 and 31 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 37. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Counts One through Three that, upon their conviction of such the offenses, the government will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any property constituting or derived from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of such offenses. 38. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendants: diligence; (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due 15

with, a third party; court; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c) to seek forfeiture of any other property of such defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation. (Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853) SECOND CRIMINAL FORFEITURE ALLEGATION (Counts Four through Thirteen) 39. The allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 33 and 35 are realleged and incorporated as if fully set forth in this paragraph. 40. The United States hereby gives notice to the defendants charged in Counts Four through Thirteen that, upon their conviction for such offenses, the government will seek forfeiture in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, Section 982, of all property involved in the offense in violation 16

of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956, or conspiracy to commit such offense, and all property traceable to such property as a result of defendants conviction of Counts Four through Twelve of this indictment. 41. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant(s): (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of such defendant(s) up to the value of the forfeitable property described in this forfeiture allegation, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) all right, title and interest to the real property located at 9 Captain s Walk, Bayshore, New York, in the name of defendant STEVEN INGRASSIA; 17

(b) all right, title and interest to the Carver motorboat bearing Vehicle Identification Number CDRR4051C303, in the name of defendant STEVEN INGRASSIA. (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 982(a)(1) and 982(b); Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p)) A TRUE BILL ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOREPERSON 18