QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: CIVIL PROCEDURE



Similar documents
PRETRIAL LITIGATION IN A NUTSHELL. R. LAWRENCE DESSEM Professor of Law University of Tennessee ST. PAUL, MINN. WEST PUBLISHING CO.

CLASS TIMES: Tuesday and Friday: 10:45am to 12:15pm

RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACADEMIC COURSE OUTLINE ROLE OF THE PARALEGAL LEGL-101

Computing and Extending Time; Time. The following rules apply in

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas

Judge Steve Seider Justice of the Peace Precinct 3, Place 2 Dallas County, Texas

If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading.

Determining Jurisdiction for Patent Law Malpractice Cases

RULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

CIVIL PROCEDURE ESSAY #1.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

INTERACTIVE CITATION WORKBOOK FOR THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION. and INTERACTIVE CITATION WORKBOOK FOR ALWD GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION

Case4:12-cv KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

TEXAS LAW FLAT-RATE LIBRARY

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: Patent Law

New York Civil Practice

Personal Injury Litigation

Civil Suits: The Process

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

CIVIL APPEALS PAMPHLET PRO BONO PROJECT FOR THE SPONSORED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE PRO BONO COMMITTEES FOR THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS APPELLATE SECTION

The Judges of the Fulton Superior Court hereby create a "Business Case Division" (hereinafter referred to as the "Division").

Prepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.

Locating Practice Materials

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

VII. JUDGMENT RULE 54. JUDGMENTS; COSTS

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

Information or instructions: Defendant s Cross-claims and counterclaims PREVIEW

PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS. [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] RULE 500. GENERAL RULES

INFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 29 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: <pageid>

Preparing a Federal Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Florida Family Law HIGHLIGHTS THIS BOOKLET CONTAINS THE FILING INSTRUCTIONS AND PUBLICATION UPDATE. Route to:

TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Preparing a Federal Case

Present Situation of IP Disputes in Japan

Amy S. Harris Shareholder

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: CONTRACTS

Case 1:03-cv HHK Document Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

ALEXANDRA WILSON ALBRIGHT Senior Lecturer

BRIAN F. SPECTOR, LLC

HOUSE BILL No Washburne

Section 2 Day Forward Major Jury Program

WASHINGTON COLLEGE OF LAW, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR STEVEN M. PAVSNER SYLLABUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM

Removal to Federal Court - The New Rules Making it a Federal Case: New Developments Presented by Kevin Schiferl Frost Brown Todd (Indianapolis, IN)

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution

JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM. Re: New Hampshire Superior Court Civil Rules Effective October 1, 2013

Any civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS

Mandatory Mediation and Settlement-Related Disclosure Adopted for New York Commercial Division to Encourage Early Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery

Case 3:04-cv BF Document 19 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 5 PageID 470

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case: 1:12-cv SJD-KLL Doc #: 17 Filed: 06/28/12 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 108

Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 17, Issue 4 (1956)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

PART 3 CIVIL DISTRICT COURT RULES (Revised) APROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT IN MAY 2002

Drafting and Issuing Subpoenas: New Jersey

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Norway Advokatfirmaet Grette

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

Ligitation process in Denmark 1. Litigation process in Denmark. A brief summary of the procedures and workings of the litigation process in Denmark.

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death

Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure VIII. PROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES AND SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. Rule 65. Injunctions.

F First Judicial District of Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Trial Division Civil CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Courts & Our Legal System

Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark

Case 5:06-cv XR Document 20 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

CASES & PROBLEMS IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: THE COURTROOM 2015 SUPPLEMENT. Myron Moskovitz Professor of Law Emeritus Golden Gate University

SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT

About the Author Federal Jurisdiction Reform

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

Introduction to Professional Skills. Program Description and Syllabus

ATTORNEY SPECIALIST MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JOB SPECIFICATION

the court determines at a non-jury hearing that the award is not in the best interest of the child. The burden of proof at a hearing under this

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2013

The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories NOTICE TO THE PROFESSION CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES GENERAL GUIDELINES

QUESTIONS &ANSWERS: BANKRUPTCY

RULE 39 OFFER TO SETTLE

HOUSE BILL No July 18, 2013, Introduced by Rep. Heise and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.

The trademark lawyer as brand manager

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and

Kenneth B. Walton Senior Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group direct fax

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 14-23

PERSONAL JURISDICTION HANDOUT CIVIL PROCEDURE I R. Marcus

Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee direct fax

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER

EDUCATION St. Mary's University School of Law, San Antonio, Texas J.D. with distinction 1983 Member of the John M. Harlan Society

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

2015 IL App (3d) U. Order filed February 5, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015

TEXAS ENHANCED FLAT-RATE LIBRARY

Transcription:

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: CIVIL PROCEDURE

LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Bridgette Carr Clinical Professor of Law University of Michigan Law School Steven I. Friedland Professor of Law and Senior Scholar Elon University School of Law Carole Goldberg Jonathan D. Varat Distinguished Professor of Law UCLA School of Law Oliver Goodenough Professor of Law Vermont Law School Paul Marcus Haynes Professor of Law William and Mary Law School John Sprankling Distinguished Professor of Law McGeorge School of Law

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: CIVIL PROCEDURE Multiple-Choice and Short-Answer Questions and Answers FOURTH EDITION WILLIAM V. DORSANEO, III Professor of Law and Chief Justice John and Lena Hickman Distinguished Faculty Fellow SMU Dedman School of Law ELIZABETH G. THORNBURG Richard R. Lee Endowed Professor of Law SMU Dedman School of Law

ISBN: 978 1 6328 2858 3 ebook ISBN: 978 1 6328 2859 0 This publication is designed to provide authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Matthew Bender and the Matthew Bender Flame Design are registered trademarks of Matthew Bender Properties Inc. Copyright 2015 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of LexisNexis. All Rights Reserved. No copyright is claimed by LexisNexis or Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., in the text of statutes, regulations, and excerpts from court opinions quoted within this work. Permission to copy material may be licensed for a fee from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Mass. 01923, telephone (978) 750-8400. NOTE TO USERS To ensure that you are using the latest materials available in this area, please be sure to periodically check the LexisNexis Law School web site for downloadable updates and supplements at www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool. Editorial Offices 630 Central Ave., New Providence, NJ 07974 (908) 464-6800 201 Mission St., San Francisco, CA 94105-1831 (415) 908-3200 www.lexisnexis.com (2015 Pub.3173)

ABOUT THE AUTHORS William V. Dorsaneo, III, is Professor of Law and Chief Justice John and Lena Hickman Distinguished Faculty Fellow at Dedman School of Law, Southern Methodist University. Professor Dorsaneo was a litigation specialist in Dallas after graduation from law school. He is the principal author of the 26 volume TEXAS LITIGATION GUIDE and the co-author of the five-volume TEXAS CIVIL TRIAL GUIDE, as well as three casebooks entitled CASES AND MATERIALS ON CIVIL PROCEDURE, TEXAS PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION, and TEXAS TRIAL & APPELLATE PRACTICE, and several other volumes on Texas litigation. He has written numerous articles on civil procedure. He is Board certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in Civil Appellate Law and maintains an active appellate practice. He is also a board member of the Appellate Judges Education Institute and a member of the Institute s Education Committee, a member of the Advisory Committee to the Texas Supreme Court, and Chairman of the Committee s Appellate Rules Subcommittee and a member of the American Law Institute. Elizabeth G. Thornburg is Richard R. Lee Endowed Professor of Law at Dedman School of Law, Southern Methodist University. After clerking for a federal judge, Professor Thornburg was a commercial litigator before she began teaching at SMU. She is a member of the American Law Institute, the American Bar Association, and the State Bar of Texas. She has served on the Executive Committee and the Complex Litigation Committee of the Civil Procedure section of the Association of American Law Schools, as well as on Texas Supreme Court task forces on procedure issues. Professor Thornburg specializes in the areas of civil procedure, alternative dispute resolution, conflict of laws, and comparative civil procedure. Her publications include numerous articles on civil procedure issues, as well as co-authorship of TEXAS PRE-TRIAL LITIGATION and TEXAS TRIAL & APPELLATE PRACTICE. Together, Professors Dorsaneo and Thornburg have taught procedure for more than 50 years. iii

PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION Like its predecessors, the Fourth Edition of Questions and Answers: Civil Procedure is a supplementary text for use primarily by first-year Civil Procedure students to obtain a clear understanding of the subjects typically covered in either a four-hour first semester Civil Procedure class or a longer Civil Procedure class extending over subsequent semesters. The Fourth Edition builds on the foundation established in the first three editions, by revising and updating the topics covered in the Third Edition and by extending coverage to all of the subjects that are covered by the Civil Procedure sections of the Multistate Bar Examination. As a result, the Fourth Edition contains the following revisions and additions. Revisions to the coverage of personal jurisdiction based on the Supreme Court s two 2014 decisions in Daimler AG v. Bauman and Walden v. Fiore. Coverage of the Supreme Court s decision in Atlantic Marine Const. Co. Inc. v. District Court concerning venue transfer practice and forum selection clauses. Additional coverage of federal question jurisdiction applying Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue in the context of patent suits under 28 U.S.C. 1338(a) derived from the Supreme Court s opinion in Gunn v. Minton. Coverage of proposed revisions of the rules of civil procedure, especially rules on discovery relevance, discovery and other procedures and pretrial deadlines. Coverage of service of process and due process notice. Coverage of federal common law. Coverage of preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders. Coverage of jury practice, including jury selection, requests for and objections to jury instructions and jury verdicts. Revised and expanded coverage of challenges to jury findings and verdicts, judicial findings and conclusions, and challenges to the trial judge s findings of fact and conclusions of law in bench trials. Coverage of default judgments and involuntary dismissals. As updated and expanded, this edition of the Q&A book allows professors and students to easily incorporate the topics covered in the Fourth Edition in a course syllabus that will cover subjects anticipated to be covered on the Multistate Bar Examination, whether or not the questions and answers on these subjects can actually be covered during class hours. As with each of the prior editions of the Q&A book, students will benefit by using the text to clarify, reinforce, and extend their comprehension of basic civil procedure course material. We would like to thank our students, on whom many of the questions in the prior editions have been tested for years. Special thanks must also be extended to Katya Long, Juris Doctor Candidate (2016) for her dedicated and capable assistance in finalizing the preparation of this Fourth Edition. PROFESSOR WILLIAM V. DORSANEO, III PROFESSOR ELIZABETH THORNBURG Dallas, Texas January 2015 v

INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS: HOW TO USE THIS BOOK Understanding Civil Procedure can unravel the mysteries of both the Civil Procedure course itself and the procedural context that shapes the cases you read in your other first-year courses. At its most basic, Civil Procedure covers a set of quite technical rules that litigators must master in order to guide their clients and their cases through the court system. Mastery at this technical level is important, but the fun of Civil Procedure comes when you begin to understand how the rules interact, and how they can be used to achieve legitimate goals. At a deeper level, a sophisticated knowledge of Civil Procedure is the key to thoughtful analysis of the policy issues involved: who do the rules benefit, and why? Who should they benefit? Should changes be made in order to better serve the interests of justice? This book is designed to help you understand the nature and operation of the rules that govern procedure in the federal courts in the United States. The questions range from simple identification of the rules themselves to applying the rules to complex hypothetical fact patterns. Some questions invite you to begin to think about the strategic use of the rules, and about the policy implications of the choices the rules make. The individual topics address issues one at a time, while the Final Examination allows you to test your skill at recognizing the interplay of a number of issues in simulated cases. The book begins by walking you through the steps of a typical lawsuit: the parties pleadings, the proper joinder of claims and parties, the discovery process, summary judgment, trial, post-trial motions, the binding effect of judgments, state law in federal court, federal common law and appellate practice. It also covers questions about where suits can be brought. Finally, the book examines a specialized question of law application: when must the federal courts apply state rather than federal law (a topic often called the Erie doctrine). Civil Procedure teachers and texts introduce these topics in different orders. The topics are therefore treated independently, so you can use this book in the order in which you study procedure. Questions & Answers: Civil Procedure is designed so that you can use the questions either to reinforce and clarify material as you move through the first-year course, or to test yourself in preparation for your final examination. As you read each question, try to identify the rule or rules involved, and then apply them to the facts presented. Think about the issues raised by both the correct and incorrect answers. This should help you to answer multiple choice format questions such as those found in this book. It should also help you to understand the rules in operation, and to recognize patterns of issues that will help you in answering questions on essay exams. We hope that this book will help you enjoy Civil Procedure. Once the initial unfamiliarity begins to fade, it will in fact start to hang together. We would also like to thank our students over the years, who have given us ideas for both right and wrong answers. PROFESSOR WILLIAM V. DORSANEO, III PROFESSOR ELIZABETH THORNBURG Dallas, Texas January 2015 vii

Table of Contents QUESTIONS Page TOPIC 1: PLEADINGS: PLAINTIFF S PLEADINGS...........................................3 TOPIC 2: PLEADINGS: DEFENDANT S PLEADINGS........................................ 7 TOPIC 3: PLEADINGS: HEIGHTENED SPECIFICITY........................................ 11 TOPIC 4: AMENDED PLEADINGS...................................................... 13 TOPIC 5: JOINDER OF CLAIMS........................................................ 15 TOPIC 6: PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES............................................ 17 TOPIC 7: COMPULSORY JOINDER OF PARTIES.......................................... 19 TOPIC 8: INTERPLEADER............................................................ 21 TOPIC 9: INTERVENTION............................................................ 23 TOPIC 10: JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES............................................ 25 TOPIC 11: COUNTERCLAIMS & CROSS-CLAIMS.......................................... 27 TOPIC 12: CLASS ACTIONS........................................................... 29 TOPIC 13: DISCOVERY: AUTOMATIC INITIAL DISCLOSURES................................ 31 TOPIC 14: DISCOVERY: SCOPE OF DISCOVERY & DISCOVERY RELEVANCE................... 35 TOPIC 15: DISCOVERY: WORK PRODUCT................................................ 39 TOPIC 16: DISCOVERY: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE.................................... 43 TOPIC 17: DISCOVERY: EXPERT WITNESSES............................................. 45 TOPIC 18: DISCOVERY DEVICES....................................................... 47 TOPIC 19: DISCOVERY: ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION.......................... 51 TOPIC 20: DISCOVERY SANCTIONS.................................................... 53 TOPIC 21: INVOLUNTARY DISMISSALS AND DEFAULT JUDGMENTS......................... 55 TOPIC 22: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: SUMMARY JUDGMENT BURDENS......................... 57 TOPIC 23: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE BURDENS APPLIED................................. 61 TOPIC 24: RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL...................................................... 65 TOPIC 25: SELECTION AND COMPOSITION OF JURIES..................................... 67 TITLE 26: JURY INSTRUCTIONS: FORM AND OBJECTIONS.................................. 69 TOPIC 27: BURDENS OF PROOF AT TRIAL; PRIMA FACIE CASE AND PRESUMPTIONS............ 73 TOPIC 28: MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; STANDARD AND SCOPE OF REVIEW..................................................... 77 TOPIC 29: BENCH TRIALS; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW................... 79 TOPIC 30: MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL & RULE 60(B) MOTIONS............................... 81 TOPIC 31: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP..................... 83 TOPIC 32: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY.................... 89 TOPIC 33: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: FEDERAL QUESTIONS.......................... 93 TOPIC 34: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION.................. 97 TOPIC 35: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: COMPARING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION & THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT............................ 101 TOPIC 36: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: REMOVAL.................................. 105 TOPIC 37: TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION: VOCABULARY.................................. 109 TOPIC 38: CONSENT, STATUS, DOMICILE & TRANSIENT JURISDICTION...................... 111 TOPIC 39: IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION: OVERVIEW..................................... 113 TOPIC 40: SPECIFIC JURISDICTION.................................................... 115 TOPIC 41: GENERAL JURISDICTION................................................... 119 TOPIC 42: PERSONAL JURISDICTION: PROCEDURAL ISSUES............................... 121 TOPIC 43: SERVICE OF PROCESS...................................................... 123 TOPIC 44: VENUE GENERALLY....................................................... 125 TOPIC 45: CHANGE OF VENUE....................................................... 129 TOPIC 46: VENUE, FORUM NON CONVENIENS, AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES................... 131 TOPIC 47: CLAIM PRECLUSION....................................................... 133 TOPIC 48: ISSUE PRECLUSION........................................................ 135 ix

Table of Contents TOPIC 49: NON-MUTUAL ISSUE PRECLUSION........................................... 137 TOPIC 50: THE LAW OF THE CASE DOCTRINE........................................... 139 TOPIC 51: STATE LAW IN FEDERAL COURT: OVERVIEW.................................. 141 TOPIC 52: STATE LAW IN FEDERAL COURT (THE ERIE DOCTRINE).......................... 143 TOPIC 53: FEDERAL COMMON LAW................................................... 147 TOPIC 54: APPELLATE JURISDICTION................................................. 149 TOPIC 55: APPELLATE PROCEDURE................................................... 151 PRACTICE FINAL EXAM: QUESTIONS......................................................... 153 ANSWERS............................................................................. 183 TOPIC 1: PLEADINGS: PLAINTIFF S PLEADINGS........................................ 185 TOPIC 2: PLEADINGS: DEFENDANT S PLEADINGS....................................... 189 TOPIC 3: PLEADINGS: HEIGHTENED SPECIFICITY....................................... 195 TOPIC 4: AMENDED PLEADINGS..................................................... 197 TOPIC 5: JOINDER OF CLAIMS....................................................... 201 TOPIC 6: PERMISSIVE JOINDER OF PARTIES........................................... 203 TOPIC 7: COMPULSORY JOINDER OF PARTIES.......................................... 205 TOPIC 8: INTERPLEADER........................................................... 207 TOPIC 9: INTERVENTION........................................................... 209 TOPIC 10: JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES........................................... 211 TOPIC 11: COUNTERCLAIMS & CROSS-CLAIMS.......................................... 213 TOPIC 12: CLASS ACTIONS.......................................................... 215 TOPIC 13: DISCOVERY: AUTOMATIC INITIAL DISCLOSURES............................... 217 TOPIC 14: DISCOVERY: SCOPE OF DISCOVERY & DISCOVERY RELEVANCE.................. 221 TOPIC 15: DISCOVERY: WORK PRODUCT............................................... 225 TOPIC 16: DISCOVERY: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE................................... 229 TOPIC 17: DISCOVERY: EXPERT WITNESSES............................................ 231 TOPIC 18: DISCOVERY DEVICES...................................................... 233 TOPIC 19: DISCOVERY: ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION......................... 237 TOPIC 20: DISCOVERY SANCTIONS................................................... 239 TOPIC 21: INVOLUNTARY DISMISSALS AND DEFAULT JUDGMENTS........................ 241 TOPIC 22: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: SUMMARY JUDGMENT BURDENS........................ 243 TOPIC 23: SUMMARY JUDGMENT: THE BURDENS APPLIED................................ 247 TOPIC 24: RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL..................................................... 251 TOPIC 25: SELECTION AND COMPOSITION OF JURIES.................................... 253 TITLE 26: JURY INSTRUCTIONS: FORM AND OBJECTIONS................................. 257 TOPIC 27: BURDENS OF PROOF AT TRIAL; PRIMA FACIE CASE AND PRESUMPTIONS........... 261 TOPIC 28: MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; STANDARD AND SCOPE OF REVIEW.................................................... 265 TOPIC 29: BENCH TRIALS; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.................. 267 TOPIC 30: MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL & RULE 60(B) MOTIONS.............................. 269 TOPIC 31: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP.................... 271 TOPIC 32: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY................... 277 TOPIC 33: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: FEDERAL QUESTIONS......................... 281 TOPIC 34: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION................. 285 TOPIC 35: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: COMPARING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION & THE CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT............................ 289 TOPIC 36: SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: REMOVAL.................................. 291 TOPIC 37: TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION: VOCABULARY.................................. 295 TOPIC 38: CONSENT, STATUS, DOMICILE & TRANSIENT JURISDICTION...................... 297 TOPIC 39: IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION: OVERVIEW..................................... 301 TOPIC 40: SPECIFIC JURISDICTION.................................................... 305 TOPIC 41: GENERAL JURISDICTION................................................... 313 TOPIC 42: PERSONAL JURISDICTION: PROCEDURAL ISSUES............................... 317 TOPIC 43: SERVICE OF PROCESS...................................................... 319 TOPIC 44: VENUE GENERALLY....................................................... 321 TOPIC 45: CHANGE OF VENUE....................................................... 325 x

Table of Contents TOPIC 46: VENUE, FORUM NON CONVENIENS, AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES................... 327 TOPIC 47: CLAIM PRECLUSION....................................................... 329 TOPIC 48: ISSUE PRECLUSION........................................................ 331 TOPIC 49: NON-MUTUAL ISSUE PRECLUSION........................................... 333 TOPIC 50: THE LAW OF THE CASE DOCTRINE........................................... 335 TOPIC 51: STATE LAW IN FEDERAL COURT: OVERVIEW.................................. 337 TOPIC 52: STATE LAW IN FEDERAL COURT (THE ERIE DOCTRINE).......................... 339 TOPIC 53: FEDERAL COMMON LAW................................................... 343 TOPIC 54: APPELLATE JURISDICTION................................................. 345 TOPIC 55: APPELLATE PROCEDURE................................................... 347 PRACTICE FINAL EXAM: ANSWERS.......................................................... 349 INDEX.................................................................................. 379 xi