Spoliation of Evidence. Prepared for:

Similar documents
Securing the Evidence: Critical Steps in Investigation of a Crashworthiness Case

How To Preserve Evidence

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES WITH LITIGATION IN MIND

Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production

Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.

Assembly Bill No. 5 CHAPTER 5

Litigation Hold Notices & Electronic Discovery A R E S O U R C E F O R W S U E M P L OY E E S

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT. Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them.

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Minnesota False Claims Act

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance

Representing Whistleblowers Nationwide

Storm Damage Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx

Litigating the Products Liability Case: Discovery

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE

Data Preservation Duties and Protocols

Personal Injury Litigation

FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No.

ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management.

S.B th General Assembly (As Introduced)

COALSP 2013 E-Discovery Case Law Update. Drew Unthank Partner Wheeler Trigg O Donnell LLP

Chapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant

E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII. J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT United States District Judge

INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT (Slip/Trip/Fall)

Best Practices Series Document Retention and Best Practices

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Do You Have a Case? Truck Accident. ebooklet. Andrew Miller. 201 South 3rd Street Logansport, IN P: (574)

Case 1:02-cv LJM-VSS Document 179 Filed 01/09/06 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: <pageid>

Spoliation of Evidence

SUBCHAPTER 10L INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION FORMS SECTION.0100 WORKERS COMPENS ATION FORMS

PART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery

ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830

SUBMISSION AND RECOVERY OF PROPERTY DAMAGE CLAIMS

Oklahoma Supreme Court Declares Oklahoma s Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009 Unconstitutional

FURR & HENSHAW Oak Street, P.O. Box 2909 Myrtle Beach, SC Phone: (843) and

An act can be both a crime and a tort. Example reckless driving resulting in an accident

GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS

Case 2:05-cv HGB-ALC Document 342 Filed 07/14/08 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO.

DOCUMENT RETENTION STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS

NEW YORK FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Sangamon County Circuit Clerk Anthony P. Libri. Small Claims Court Manual

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE

Lowcountry Injury Law

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

What to expect when you are injured in a New York accident!

Professional Practice 544

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

NY PIP Rule Revisions

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR CAR WRECK CASE PAGE 1

Reduce Cost and Risk during Discovery E-DISCOVERY GLOSSARY

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

TITLE 18 INSURANCE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Consumer Rights. 901 Arbitration of Automobile and Homeowners' Insurance Claims

The Ins and Outs of Written Discovery and Motion Practice:

PROTOCOL FOR DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING RESPONSE PROGRAM. For Officer/Deputy-Involved Shootings and In-Custody Deaths

Whistleblower Act, 2006 Act 720

Last Approval Date: May Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, XXXXX XXXXX XXXX.

TITLE I REDUCTION OF ABUSIVE LITIGATION

102 ediscovery Shakedown: Lowering your Risk. Kindred Healthcare

May 2015 Vol. 44, No. 5 Page 45. Articles Family Law Preservation of Social Media Evidence in a Family Law Context

LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE. COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES THOUGHTS ON THE NOTE TO PROPOSED RULE 37(e) April 25, 2014

Legal view of digital evidence

When E-Discovery Becomes Evidence

Colorado s Civil Access Pilot Project and the Changing Landscape of Business Litigation

What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents?

INSURANCE CLAIMS HANDLING & REPORTING PROTOCOL

Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings

WORKERS' COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS

How to Win the Battle Over Electronic Discovery in Employment Cases. By Philip L. Gordon, Esq.

Product Liability: Winning Strategies and Techniques.

COBB COUNTY STATE COURT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * * * * * * * * SUMMONS CASE NO.:

Counsel must be fully familiar with the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court 22 NYCRR Part 202.

RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

How To Prove Guilt In A Court Case In Texas

How to Avoid The Biggest Electronic Evidence Mistakes. Ken Jones Senior Technology Architect Pileum Corporation

Right to Financial Privacy Act

As used in this chapter, the following words shall, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the following

METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS

Title 31 MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.

Sangamon County Circuit Clerk s Office. Small Claims Court Manual. Updated March 2008

RULE FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES

A Brief Overview of ediscovery in California

Discovery Devices. Rule 26 requires the automatic disclosure of a host of basic information regarding the case

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

Delaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq.

TABLE OF CONTENTS INSURANCE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN COLORADO. Exhibit 1A Bad Faith Case Outcomes 2.1 INSURED S REMEDIES LIMITED UNDER CONTRACT LAW

You ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit

The E-Discovery Process

Transcription:

Spoliation of Evidence Prepared for:

Spoliation Nationwide anti-spoliation trend Cases can be thrown out of court Insurers can be denied subrogation claims An insured who destroys evidence of a claim can have his claim denied due to the insurers inability to subrogate Marine surveyors and engineers may be liable to insurers that employ them for spoliation that results in the insurers inability to defend claims

Spoliation Expert witnesses can be prevented from testifying, which may effectively prevent their employer s recovery Product liability defendants are put at severe disadvantage when they are forced to defend suits without access to the product which is basis for the litigation

Spoliation Spoliation: the loss, destruction or material alteration of evidence or potential evidence, so that it is no longer available to other parties in pending or future litigation Spoliator: the individual or entity that cause spoliation. He or she may be liable to the other parties for intentional or unintentional spoliation

Spoliation - Examples One of the parties to a lawsuit or his agent causes spoliation of evidence and the opposing party seeks sanctions Spoliation by an insurer Spoliation by an expert witness Spoliation by a property owner Independent. disinterested, third party

Spoliation- Types Intentional Courts have determined that more serious sanctions should be applied to cases where spoliation has resulted from fault or intentional actions of the spoliator Negligent spoliation Where the court finds no evidence of fault or intent to cause spoliation of evidence, a finding of negligent spoliation may still provide a basis for application of sanctions against the spoliator

Spoliation Clearly those who intentionally destroy evidence are placing themselves at risk. Inadvertent or unintentional destruction of evidence may also present ramifications. The critical question is: should the litigate have known the evidence represented relevant information in pending, imminent, or reasonably foreseeable litigation.

Spoliation - Ramifications In order to prevent a spoliator from benefiting from his or her actions, the courts impose a variety of sanctions against the spoliator and provide various remedies for the injured party. Product liability cases are especially sensitive to the damaging effects of spoliation. Demonstrating the condition of the product at the time of sale and at the time of accident is crucial to the plaintiff s proof in such actions.

Spoliation - Ramifications Adverse evidentiary inferences The court may instruct the jury that they may infer the spoliated evidence was adverse to the spoliator or The jury must infer the spoliated evidence was adverse to the spoliator unless the spoliator proves otherwise

Spoliation - Ramifications When sanction is applied. Relevant evidence has been destroyed. Legal proceedings were pending, and. The destruction was an intentional act of the party or party s agents indicative of fraud or intent to suppress the truth. Inference is rebut table. Evidence explaining the tampering, or facts contrary to those inferred by the tampering.

Spoliation - Ramifications Civil discovery sanctions Reimbursement of attorney s fees Recovery of discovery costs Striking an answer Precluding introduction of expert testimony related to the destroyed evidence; And Entry of summary judgment, default, dismissal, or directed verdict

Spoliation - Ramifications Exclusion of experts and evidence When Why Summary judgment Dismissal Fault or intent necessary Directed verdict Violation of court order

Spoliation an Example?

Spoliation - Avoidance ASTM e1188 Standard practice for collection and preservation of information and physical items by a technical investigator Covers guidelines for the collection and preservation of information and physical items by ANY technical investigator pertaining to an incident that CAN be reasonably expected to be the subject of litigation

Spoliation - Avoidance E1188-significance and use Obtain sufficient information and physical items to discover evidence associated with the incident and to preserve it for later analysis The quality of evidence may change with time, therefore special effort should be made to preserve it The collected and preserve evidence shall be identified with and traceable to the incident

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure Collect information related to events and conditions occurring before, during, or after the incident Obtain and preserve physical items as early as possible. Plan the investigation to protect physical evidence significant to the incident Commence photographic documentation as soon as possible after the incident

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure Evidence and information gathered by investigators must be admissible in the event of litigation. Validity and authenticity must be established and the chain of custody traceable. Initial collection information. Identity of the evidence and any unique labeling. Location where evidence was found. Date and time the evidence was found or obtained, and. Name and address of individual who initially removed the evidence from the incident scene.

Spoliation - Avoidance Subsequent custody transfer info Names and addresses of the previous custodian and the new custodian Modification, handling, testing, and examination to which an item was subjected, while controlled by the previous custodian, and Configuration and condition when transferred to the new custodian

Spoliation - Avoidance ASTM e860. Standard practice for examining and testing items that are or may become involved in products liability litigation. This practice sets forth guidelines for the examination and testing of actual items or systems that may have been involved in a specific incident that is or is reasonably expected to be the subject of products liability litigation.

Spoliation - Avoidance Significance and use Outlines the procedure to be followed in documenting the nature, state, or condition of evidence; Describes specific actions that are required if any planned testing, examination, disassembly, or other action is likely to alter the nature, state, or condition of the evidence so as to preclude or adversely limit similar, or further meaningful examination and testing

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure Document the nature, state, and condition of the evidence by descriptive, photographic, or other suitable methods prior to any test examination, disassembly, or alteration. Also attempt to determine and document whether the evidence has changed or been altered, since the incident

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure. If the test, examination or other action to be performed is likely to alter the nature, state, or condition of the evidence..the do the following. Notify the client that the planned test, examination, disassembly, or other action is likely to alter the state, condition, etc. Recommend that the client notify the other parties in interest o the planned test, examination, disassembly

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure. Recommend to the client that the other parties in interest be given the opportunity to undertake the procedure in 4.1 and to witness or record such test, examination, disassembly, or other action. If compelling reasons exist for the performance of unilateral testing, examination, disassembly as defined in 4.2 without the notification required in 4.2 then such compelling reason must be documented.

Spoliation - Avoidance Procedure. On completion of the testing, examination, disassembly or other actions all parts and pieces of the evidence not returned to service must be preserved in such a manner as to protect and maintain their identity and integrity. Documentation. The methods used and the results obtained in all tests, examination.must be documented and preserved.

Spoliation - Avoidance Practical suggestions. Upon arrival at the scene photographically document the condition/s BEFORE you enter or examine, alter the scene. If you retain an item, photo it in situ, identify it and photo again in situ. Log all items and identify the storage location. Log removals and get a receipt to maintain the chain of custody. Do not disassemble or test components unless you have followed E860.

Spoliation - Avoidance Practical suggestions.. Be prepared to store items indefinitely, or prepare a storage policy and stick to it. Be prepared to store files indefinitely, or prepare a storage policy and stick to it. Do not allow anyone to inspect items, without your clients permission, court order, etc. Keep a record of when, where, who, inspected.

Spoliation Finally.. Consider purchasing forensic expert insurance coverage.