NO. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION. Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas,



Similar documents
NO. ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. COME NOW, THE STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through Attorney General GREG

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION. Greg Abbott, and complains of OLD UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ( Defendant ), and I.

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY COUNTY, TEXAS. CVS PHARMACY, INC. Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT

No. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. against LEAD CONCEPTS, INC. and CHRISTOPHER WEIR (collectively referred to as

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act ( DTPA ). 1 The

SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the

CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S

CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF=S ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. against AMERICA S RECOMMENDED MAILERS, INC. and TINA HENNESSY (collectively

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

CAUSE NO. THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS NEDITH TORRES JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

NO. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff State of North Carolina, by and through its Attorney General, brings this action

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

CAUSE NO. JULIE TORBERT, as next friend of IN THE DISTRICT COURT PHILIP ORMSTON V. DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:14-cv PBS Document 1 Filed 03/10/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No.

No. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. PLAINTIFF, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

NO. STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :

NO. GV ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25

No. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,

CAUSE NO. D-1-GN MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AND ORIGINAL ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS THE CITY OF DENTON, TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Misc. Docket No. Il Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action

PREVIEW. 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Misc Docket No

NO. PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Now comes, Tommy Adkisson, individually, in his official capacity as Bexar County

Case 1:14-cv ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.

Case 2:10-cv JCM-LRL Document 1 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 8

4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in

Misc Docket No

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.

(1) The term automatic telephone dialing system means equipment which has the capacity

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 97-

Case: 1:13-cv SSB-SKB Doc #: 9 Filed: 03/11/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 31

CAUSE NO. JUSTIN GROGG IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, vs. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY. No.

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS KANSAS CITY-LEAVENWORTH DIVISION

Case 0:13-cv RSR Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv Document 1 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )

Case 9:13-cv DPG Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2013 Page 1 of 8

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,

RDER OF THE SUP R EME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-9i72

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

4:15-cv RBH Date Filed 01/29/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

Case 1:14-cv RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

How To Get A Divorce From A Married Man In Texas

Michie's Legal Resources. This part shall be known and may be cited as the Tennessee Identity Theft Deterrence Act of [Acts 1999, ch. 201, 2.

ER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

FILE# )1L- Lf 'f- '7 25:" -1 S- 1.D. # 4 '7- :f--'2s- RQ- 00:l 2- Jl P

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2015 Page 1 of 21

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. Case No. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 95-

Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Misc Docket No. 99- (3005

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1

Case 6:15-cv JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. MARIA GODINEZ, an individual,

CREDIT REPAIR ORGANIZATIONS ACT 15 U.S.C et. seq.

Transcription:

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. ABIO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of ABIO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant ABIO Financial Group, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas with its principal place of business at 10670 N. Central Expressway, #440, Dallas, Texas. Defendant may be served by serving its registered agent, John M. Abio at 11551 Forest Central Dr., #330, Dallas, Texas, 75243. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. 2

VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. that: VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling financial planning services for senior citizens. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. On information and belief, Defendant s telemarketing calls, many of which are conducted through a prerecorded voice message, are made using an automated telephone dialing system. 8.2 Despite the fact that Defendant routinely makes telemarketing calls as part of its regular business model, Defendant has failed to register and purchase the Texas no-call list. 8.3 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. 3

occurrences. 8.4 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.4. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 4

10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 463-1269 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. MILTON M. NELSON d/b/a ALL AMERICAN BUILDERS, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of MILTON M. NELSON d/b/a ALL AMERICAN BUILDERS, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Milton M. Nelson is an individual doing business in the State of Texas as All American Builders, Inc. Defendant may be served at his principle place of business, 227 NE Loop 820 #171 (or #6-A), Hurst, Texas, 76053. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. 2

VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant that: a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling house siding. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. 8.2 Despite the fact that Defendant routinely makes telemarketing calls as part of its regular business model, Defendant has failed to register and purchase the Texas no-call list. 8.3 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.4 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.4. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by 3

making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. 4

Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division PEDRO PEREZ, JR. State Bar No. 00788184 C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 475-4656 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. ALL AMERICAN SIDING OF AUSTIN, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of ALL AMERICAN SIDING OF AUSTIN, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant All American Siding of Austin, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas with its principal place of business at 3007 Longhorn Blvd., #109, Austin, Texas, 78758. Defendant may be served by serving its registered agent, Ken Kirks at 1810 N. Glenville Drive #102, Richardson, Texas, 75081. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. 2

VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. that: VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling house siding. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated 3

IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 4

10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division D. ESTHER CHAVEZ State Bar No. 04162200 C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorneys General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 475 4628 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH C. SPARKS d/b/a AREA WIDE AUTO GLASS Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of JOSEPH C. SPARKS d/b/a AREA WIDE AUTO GLASS ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Joseph C. Sparks is an individual doing business in the State of Texas as Area Wide Auto Glass. Defendant may be served at 3911 Flatwood Dr., Katy, Texas 77449. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. 2

VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant that: a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling automobile glass repair services. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by 3

making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. 4

Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division D. ESTHER CHAVEZ State Bar No. 04162200 C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorneys General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 463-1269 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. AUTOPRO NETWORK, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of AUTOPRO NETWORK, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Autopro Network, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Oklahoma with its principal place of business at 4815 S. Harvard Ave. #225, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135. This cause of action arises out of the business Defendant has done in this state. Defendant does not maintain a regular place of business in this state and has not designated an agent for service of process. Therefore, pursuant to section 17.044(b) of the TEX. CIV. & PRAC. REMEDIES CODE ANN., Defendant may be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, directed to Defendant through the Texas Secretary of State as an agent for service of process at Citations Division, 1019 Brazos, Austin, Texas 78701. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will 2

also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. that: VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling financing for automobiles. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes or to solicit the extension of credit for a consumer good or service. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. 3

8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated occurrences. IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 4

10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 463-1269 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. AUTO FINANCE 4 PRE-OWNED CARS, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of AUTO FINANCE 4 PRE-OWNED CARS, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Auto Finance 4 Pre-owned Cars, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas with its principal place of business at 12725 Murphy Rd., Stafford, Texas, 77477. Defendant may be served by serving its registered agent, Roark Ashie at 4511 Westray Dr., Missouri City, Texas, 77459. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. 2

VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. that: VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling financing for automobiles. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes or to solicit the extension of credit for a consumer good or service. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated 3

IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 4

10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 463-1269 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON ALLSTATE, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of HOUSTON ALLSTATE, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Houston Allstate, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas with its principal place of business at 5750 Bintliff, #200, Houston, Texas 77036. Defendant may be served by serving its registered agent, James C. Lagrappe, Jr. at 5750 Bintliff, #200, Houston, Texas 77036. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. 2

VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. that: VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VIII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling home improvement products and services, including vinyl siding, overhang and eaves, windows, doors, roofing and insulation. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated 3

IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 4

10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. Respectfully submitted, GREG ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas BARRY R. MCBEE First Assistant Attorney General EDWARD D. BURBACH Deputy Attorney General for Litigation PAUL D. CARMONA Chief, Consumer Protection Division C. BRAD SCHUELKE State Bar No. 24008000 Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 (512) 463-1269 FAX No. (512) 473-8301 5

NO. STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. JOE COOKSTON & SONS, INC. Defendant IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Plaintiff the STATE OF TEXAS, acting by and through the Attorney General of Texas, GREG ABBOTT, complains of JOE COOKSTON & SONS, INC. ( Defendant ), and for causes of action would respectfully show: I. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 The discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under Level 2 pursuant to TEX. R. CIV. P. 190.3. II. SUMMARY OF CASE 2.1 The Texas Telemarketing Disclosure and Privacy Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE 44.001 et seq. (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( TTDPA ) prohibits, among other things, making a telemarketing call to a telephone number that has been published on the Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Defendant has violated the TTDPA by making repeated telemarketing calls to Texas residents who have paid to have their telephone number included on the Texas no-call list. 2.2 The TTDPA specifically grants the Texas Attorney General authority to enforce the TTDPA through lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorneys fees and civil penalties. The TTDPA also grants the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General s Office the authority to

enforce the statute pursuant to section 17.47 of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN., 17.41, et seq. (VERNON 1987 and Supp.2003) ( DTPA ). III. JURISDICTION and VENUE 3.1 This action is brought by Attorney General Greg Abbott, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the STATE OF TEXAS and in the public interest under the authority granted to him by section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and the authority granted to him by section 17.47 of the DTPA. TTDPA. 3.2 Venue of this suit lies in Travis County, Texas pursuant to section 44.102(e) of the IV. DEFENDANT 4.1 Defendant Joe Cookston & Sons, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas. Defendant may be served by serving its registered agent, Joe Cookston at 3603 Broadway Blvd., Garland, Texas, 75043. V. PUBLIC INTEREST 5.1 Because Plaintiff State of Texas has reason to believe that Defendant has engaged in, and will continue to engage in, the unlawful practices set forth below, Plaintiff has reason to believe Defendant has caused and will cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS, and will also cause adverse effects to legitimate business enterprises which lawfully conduct trade and commerce in this State. VI. TRADE AND COMMERCE 6.1 Defendant has, at all times described below, engaged in conduct which constitutes "trade" and "commerce" as those terms are defined by 17.45(6) of the DTPA. 2

VII. ACTS OF AGENTS 7.1 Whenever in this Petition it is alleged that a Defendant did any act, it is meant that: a. The Defendant performed or participated in the act; or b. The Defendant s officers, agents, or employees performed or participated in the act on behalf of and under the authority of the Defendant. VII. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8.1 Defendant is in the business of selling house siding. Defendant solicits customers for its business through various methods, including unsolicited telephone solicitations. Defendant s telemarketing calls, therefore, are intended to solicit the sale of goods or services that are normally used for personal, family, or household purposes. 8.2 In the course of its soliciting customers, Defendant has made, or caused to be made, multiple and repeated unsolicited telemarketing calls to persons whose telephone number appeared on the then-current Texas no-call list for more than 60 days. Such telemarketing calls were made despite the fact that Defendant does not have a current or prior established business relationship with the called person. occurrences. 8.3 Defendant s telemarketing calls in violation of the TTDPA were not isolated IX. CAUSE OF ACTION 9.1 Plaintiff hereby incorporates the preceding paragraphs 1.1 through 8.3. 9.2 Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has violated section 44.102(a) of the TTDPA by making telemarketing calls to Texas residents whose telephone numbers were included on the thencurrent Texas no-call list for longer than 60 days. 3

X. PRAYER 10.1 Because Defendant has engaged in the unlawful acts and practices described above, Defendant has violated and will continue to violate the law as alleged in this Petition. Unless enjoined by this Honorable Court, Defendant will continue to violate the laws of the STATE OF TEXAS and cause injury, loss and damage to the STATE OF TEXAS and to the general public. 10.2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that Defendant be cited according to law to appear and answer herein; and upon notice and hearing TEMPORARY and PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS be issued, restraining and enjoining Defendant, Defendant s agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and any other person in active concert or participation with Defendant, from further unlawful conduct as set out above. 10.3 In addition, Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS respectfully prays that this Court adjudge against Defendant civil penalties in favor of Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS in the amount of: a. One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each violation of the TTDPA; and b. Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) for each violation that was committed knowingly or willfully. 10.4 Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS further prays that this Court order Defendant to pay all costs of Court, costs of investigation, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to section 44.102(c) of the TTDPA and TEX. GOV T CODE 402.006(c) (Vernon 1998). 10.5 Plaintiff prays that this Court grant all other relief to which the Plaintiff STATE OF TEXAS may show itself entitled. 4