Supreme Court of the United States. October Term, 2012 HEARING LIST. For the Session Beginning March 18, 2013



Similar documents
2015 Abigail Ross 1. Legislative Branch. Executive Branch. Judicial Branch. Abigail F. Ellsworth Ross President, RoFinCo, LLC

American Action Forum and Blue Dog Research Forum: Bipartisan Poll of Supreme Court Experts Predicts Affordable Care Act Outcomes

Private Securities Fraud Claims Under Section 10(b) Based on False or Misleading Statements

2014 Sixth Circuit Appellate Practice Institute

2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD

CHAPTER 16 THE FEDERAL COURTS CHAPTER OUTLINE

SUPREME HONOR 34 FALL

More Than One Way to Structure a Government: Arizona State Legislature, ASARCO, and Hollingsworth as a Failed Trilogy

Consolidated Case Nos. 04SA396 and 05SA22, State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver and Sternberg v. City and County of Denver.

Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision

Client Alert: Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in ABC v. Aereo Internet Streaming Case (Report from the Courtroom)

STATEMENT OF DAVID A. O NEIL ACTING ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CRIMINAL DIVISION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BEFORE THE

blind trust FIX THE COURT A SPECIAL report by

Wealth Management. Supreme Court and IRS Take on Deductibility of Trust Investment Management Fees

promoted to Associate Dean. The Boalt Hall Class of 2009 selected him as the faculty commencement speaker.

The first half of 2013 has been a season

Case No. 80,158 THOMAS J. WILKES. Orange County Attorney Florida Bar No and KAYE COLLIE. Assistant County Attorney. Florida Bar No.

..., Courtroom 305. Courtroom 311. Courtroom 313. Grant S. Wegner Jury trials (felony and misdemeanor) Monday and Tuesdays; Courtroom 319

The Supreme Court of the United States

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. Respondents and Defendants.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Case 2:13-cv AWA-LRL Document 111 Filed 01/24/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 864

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Petitioner : No

Pauline Rowl P. O. Box Charlotte, NC 28222

SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212)


AGENDA PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR S LICENSING BOARD

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA. Petitioners, v. Case No CA-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendants.

Statement of Introduction on the Nomination of John B. Owens to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Senator Dianne Feinstein

Case 3:15-cv N Document 65 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2193 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Assistant Attorney General Florida Bar No Special Projects

King v. Burwell: Supreme Court Rules that ACA Tax Subsidies Are Available Through Federal Exchanges

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 ALFRED GOBEILLE, IN HIS : 4 OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIR : 5 OF THE VERMONT GREEN MOUNTAIN :

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

Negligence ~ Motor Vehicle

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc

New Financial Planning Strategies for Pennsylvania Same-Sex Couples

In the Supreme Court of the United States

CURRICULUM VITAE. JAMES JOSEPH TOMKOVICZ Edward F. Howrey Professor of Law University of Iowa College of Law

Supreme Court of the United States

2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

Case 5:10-cv OLG Document 150 Filed 11/12/12 Page 1 of 6

FOCUS ON CONSUMER CASES (Salon A, B, & C)

Medina County Domestic Relations Court Detail Schedule Meredith Watts:

C O N T E N T S ORAL ARGUMENT OF. On behalf of the Petitioners. On behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

United States v. Jones: The Government s Use of a GPS Tracking Device Constitutes a Search within the Meaning of the Fourth Amendment

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 89 Filed 10/24/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Government Experience

CMA CENTURY MEDIATION ASSOCIATES, INC. Panel of Arbitrators & Mediators New York State

Summary of the Decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

ASLB Screening After Report for November 16, 2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION II ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE ORGANIZATION WITH 50 OR MORE EMPLOYEES. By Michael Harp, MA

September 22, The Honorable Diane Feinstein 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES x 3 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND : 4 HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., : 6 v.

2015 Fall ministry schedule by minister Sept-Nov

MEMORANDUM. and. The Remaining Members of the Board of Visitors: A. Macdonald Caputo Robert D. Hardie

NO SERVICE AND DEFAULT NON-JURY TRIAL CALENDAR

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 LARRY D. JESINOSKI, ET UX., : 4 Petitioners : 5 v. : No COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, :

THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE YOU WILL RECEIVE NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION HEARING DOCKET

The Fraud-on-the-Market Method of Proving Securities Fraud: Indispensable Theory, or Device to Induce Settlements?

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 UNITED STATES, ET AL., : 4 Petitioners : No v. : 6 TEXAS, ET AL., : 7 Respondents.

Federalism and Immigration: Will the Court Choose Federal Uniformity or States Rights in Immigration Law?

VICTORY! LAW NOT ES. DOMA Section 3 Falls; Marriages Resume in California. Summer 2013

Case 1:13-cv RBJ Document 12 Filed 03/18/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 CAMPBELL EWALD COMPANY, : 4 Petitioner : No v. : 6 JOSE GOMEZ. : 7 x. 8 Washington, D.C.

newsletter Estate Planning Opportunities in a World Without DOMA

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Excise Tax Title Name Phone Group Manager Abbe Stewart

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

22 nd Annual Review of the Field of National Security Law

Case 0:08-cr RHK-AJB Document 393 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 4. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Criminal No.

THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE YOU WILL RECEIVE NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION AMENDED HEARING DOCKET

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RESPONDENT S MEMORANDUM REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT WITNESS REPORTS

JOINT MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PREVIOUSLY-FILED AMICUS BRIEFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc

Navigating the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute in Workers Compensation & Liability Claims

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

22 ND ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE FIELD

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, : 4 Petitioner : No v. : 6 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT :

# # # # # Issue and Decision of the United States Supreme Court

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT. This program is not open to any government attorneys or law enforcement personnel beyond those identified above.

Location: First National Bank of Martinsville Building (1882? 1953); 239 North Jefferson Street (1953 )


Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 7, 2013, the Petition for

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiffs-Intervenors : CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Supreme Court Decision Affirming Judicial Right to Review EEOC Actions

Savannah Marriott Riverfront Savannah, Georgia October 26 28, 2005 AGENDA. 7:45 8:30 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast Savannah Foyer

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc

Appeal Nos & (Companion Appeals) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NINTH CIRCUIT ROBSON BONNICHSEN, ET AL.,

Methamphetamine Abuse in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations. Embassy Suites at Chevy Chase Pavilion Washington, DC. September 20 & 21, 2007

Transcription:

Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2012 HEARING LIST For the Session Beginning March 18, 2013 (The Court convenes at 10 a.m.; afternoon arguments begin at 1 p.m.) Justices of the Supreme Court: Hon. Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. Hon. Antonin Scalia Hon. Anthony M. Kennedy Hon. Clarence Thomas Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hon. Stephen G. Breyer Hon. Samuel A. Alito, Jr. Hon. Sonia Sotomayor Hon. Elena Kagan Officers of the Court: William K. Suter, Clerk Christine L. Fallon, Reporter of Decisions Pamela Talkin, Marshal Linda S. Maslow, Librarian

HEARING LIST Monday, March 18, 2013 No. 12 71. Arizona, et al. v. The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc., et al. For petitioners: Thomas C. Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz. For respondents: Patricia Millett, Washington, D. C.; and Sri Srinivasan, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) No. 11 1518. Randy Curtis Bullock v. BankChampaign, N.A. Certiorari to the C. A. 11th Circuit. For petitioner: Thomas M. Byrne, Atlanta, Ga. For respondent: Bill D. Bensinger, Birmingham, Ala.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Tuesday, March 19, 2013 No. 12 236. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Melissa Cloer. Certiorari to the C. A. Federal Circuit. For petitioner: Benjamin J. Horwich, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Robert T. Fishman, Denver, Colo.

No. 12 142. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. Karen L. Bartlett. Certiorari to the C. A. 1st Circuit. For petitioner: Jay P. Lefkowitz, New York, N. Y.; and Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C. Wednesday, March 20, 2013 No. 12 123. Marvin D. Horne, et al. v. Department of Agriculture. For petitioners: Michael W. McConnell, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Joseph R. Palmore, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. No. 12 52. Dan s City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan s City Auto Body v. Robert Pelkey. Certiorari to the Supreme Court of N. H. For petitioner: Andre D. Bouffard, Burlington, Vt. For respondent: Brian C. Shaughnessy, Manchester, N. H.; and Lewis S. Yelin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Monday, March 25, 2013 No. 12 135. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John Ivan Sutter. Certiorari to the C. A. 3rd Circuit. For petitioner: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric D. Katz, Roseland, N. J.

No. 12 416. Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., et al. Certiorari to the C. A. 11th Circuit. For petitioner: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jeffrey I. Weinberger, Los Angeles, Cal. Tuesday, March 26, 2013 No. 12 144. Dennis Hollingsworth, et al. v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. For petitioners: Charles J. Cooper, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Theodore B. Olson, Washington, D. C.; and Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Wednesday, March 27, 2013 No. 12 307. United States v. Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. Certiorari to the C. A. 2nd Circuit. For Court-appointed amicus curiae: Vicki C. Jackson, Cambridge, Mass. For petitioner in support of affirmance: Sri Srinivasan, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. (Jurisdiction 50 minutes for argument.)

No. 12 307. United States v. Edith Schlain Windsor, in Her Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, et al. For respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For petitioner in support of affirmance: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent Windsor: Roberta A. Kaplan, New York, N. Y. (Merits 1 hour for argument.)