National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems. The Secure Choice



Similar documents
Policy Brief June 2010

Retirement Plan Participants and/or Beneficiaries. Harvard Human Resources, Benefits. Annual Funding Notice Harvard University Retirement Plan

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TWO PLANS ARE BETTER THAN ONE

Connecticut State Employee Collective Bargaining and Retirement Benefits

State Defined Contribution and Hybrid Pension Plans

Freezing Defined Benefit Plans

Fully Insured Pension Plan

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

What Small Employers (and their Boards) Need to Know About IMRF

Generic Local School District, Ohio Notes to the Basic Financial Statements For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System (TCRS) Pension Options for Local Governments

Synopsis of Qualified Retirement Plan Options

Variable Annuity Pension Plans: A Balanced Approach to Retirement Risk

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Notes to Basic Financial Statements December 31, 2014

Retirement Security. Public Policy Issue Statement

Select Committee on Pension Policy I s s u e P a p e r November 18, Annuity Purchase. Background. What Is An Annuity?

Cash Balance Plan Overview

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard-LKAS 26. Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans

MEMORANDUM. ERISA s Structure

Actuarial Speak 101 Terms and Definitions

Multiple annuity starting dates.

Title IV Treatment of Rollovers from Defined Contribution Plans to Defined Benefit Plans

Paving the way to a secure retirement: A model DC approach

PRESENT LAW AND BACKGROUND RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS AND THE PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION ( PBGC )

The search for the perfect pension system, like. An Integrated Approach to Pension Benefits. Conflicting Objectives. William J.

Glossary for Use with the Comprehensive Benefit Funding Plan

Pension. Presented by Frank Minter & Al Duscher

GAO STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT RETIREE BENEFITS. Current Funded Status of Pension and Health Benefits. Report to the Committee on Finance, U.S.

The Four Pillars and Public Policy Prudential s positions on legislative and regulatory issues impacting retirement security in America

CRS Report for Congress

International Accounting Standard 19 Employee Benefits

Attention: Michelle Schulz, Finance Director. The date of the valuation was December 31, The purpose of the actuarial valuation is to:

CITY OF AVENTURA POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, AND 2013

Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)

Analysis of PERS Cost Allocation, Benefit Modification, and System Financing Concepts February 14, 2013

Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015

Pension Sustainability Consensus Proposal Presentation to Task Force

What Is the Funding Status of Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans in Canada?

Buyer s Guide for. Deferred Annuities. For personal, non-commercial use only.

How to Select Your Ohio PERS Retirement Plan. (A Brief Introduction)

GM Pension Settlement Actions

COUNTY EMPLOYEES' ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF COOK COUNTY ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31,2011

PENSION PLAN OPTIONS. July 1, 2014 CITY OF MEMPHIS. Copyright 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Section 412(i) Pension Plans An Old Plan or a New Gimmick?

Buyer s Guide for. Deferred Annuities

Preventing Disastrous DB Distributions Sunday, April 28, 2013

I. Introduction. II. Methods of Pension De-Risking

CHAPTER 6 DEFINED BENEFIT AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS: UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCES

Retirement Benefits in Hong Kong

ANNUAL FUNDING NOTICE For THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PENSION PLAN FOR STAFF EMPLOYEES. Introduction

Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP)

Security Benefit Statement of Understanding

Choosing a Retirement Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction Membership Defined Benefit Portion of the Hybrid Retirement Benefits for Public Safety Officer...

FUNDING NEW JERSEY PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

International Accounting Standard 19 Employee Benefits. Objective. Scope IAS 19

Cash Balance Pension Plans Retirement Savings on Steroids. Brief History of Cash Balance Plans

5 - Member Benefits / Health Insurance Continuation

OBJECTIVE SCOPE Paragraphs 1 6 DEFINITIONS 7 SHORT-TERM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8 23 Recognition and Measurement 10 22

Buyer s Guide for. Deferred Annuities. Fixed

Overview of Hybrid Plans (Cash Balance and Pension Equity Plans)

Benefits Handbook Date September 1, Marsh & McLennan Companies Retirement Plan

Company Pension Plans in Canada

Notice to All Employees Eligible to Participate in the Halliburton Retirement and Savings Plan

FY10 Illinois Pension Reform Proposals SURS Implications Fact Sheet 5/22/09

Understanding Annuities: A Lesson in Indexed Annuities

For a complete list of EBSA publications, call toll-free: EBSA (3272) This material will be made available in alternate format upon request:

ALTERNATE BENEFIT PROGRAM MEMBER HANDBOOK

The Security Benefit Foundations Annuity Frequently Asked Questions

The Texas Municipal Retirement System

SUMMARY OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PENSIONS

Transcription:

The Secure Choice Pension (SCP) National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems

Sponsor Basic Design National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems Additional Design Details Funding Return Distributions Backstop Secure Choice Pension (SCP) NCPERS/Hank Kim Public Private Board Multiple ER, DB (career accumulation plan) Most details decided by state law; state or regional coverage Contemplated at 3% ER and 3% EE Basic benefit guaranteed at 3%; Crediting at 5%; Retiree reserve fund provides for potential dividend above 7% Annuitized payments Determined by state law Plain Old Pension Plan (POPP) Pension Rights Center/ Judy Mazo (Segal Company, retired) ER DB (career average plan) Past service credits allowed; ER could offer separate 401(k); could be converted to traditional DB plan ER contributions based on EE s age and salary; EE contributions may be allowed Percentage (as low as 1%) of EE s career average pay multiplied by YOS; bonus benefits possible in any given year Annuitized payments, except benefits worth less than $5,000 Insured by PBGC, but lower premiums ($5 per participant) Adjustable Pension Plan (APP) Cheiron/Richard Hudson ER Hybrid Pension locked in at retirement? Greater of defined floor benefit set at 5% return or adjustable benefit (actual market return) Annuitized payments Benefits reduced Portfolio Cash Balance Plan Covington & Burling/ Robert Newman ER Cash balance plan EEs automatically enrolled; benefit expressed as account balance; managed professionally ER sole funder Principal guaranteed; higher cumulative rate possible Annuitized payments? Retirement Security Funds Pension Rights Center/ Karen Ferguson RSF is new licensed legal entity; ER, EE and retiree reps on advisory board Collective trust; pooled professional investment Financial institutions are eligible; Dutch model; expanded refundable saver s credit ER at 3% minimum; EE can match (2 to 1) reverse match concept; aggregate total contribution capped at 9% Annual crediting of 3% maximum; returns over 3% held in reserve fund Annuitized payments Benefits reduced Super Simple Plan Gene Steuerle/Pamela Perun ER DB (cash balance) Models are existing SIMPLE Plans and British NEST; larger saver s credit Minimum ER (contemplated at 4%) and EE contributions (2-3%); higher limits than 401(k)s; government match for low-income savers Market return Lump sum/rollover Market return 2

The Secure Choice Pension Public Private Partnership Board of Trustees Multiple Employer Plan spreading risk DB Career AccumulationPlan (Hybrid): each participant will have an individual account providing for a minimum guaranteed benefit and an opportunity for participation in additional earnings Flexibility, Predictability, Portability, Simplicity & Sustainability Conservative actuarial, funding, and investment assumptions Effectively use the investment power of public plans Augments (not replace) existing retirement programs Multiple options to address underfunding risk 3

Summary of Proposed Pension Provisions for the Secure Choice Pension (SCP) Normal Retirement at 65 6% Contribution Rate 7 % Long Term Investment Discount Rate Interest Crediting Rate is based on a US Treasury reported rate (approximately 5%) Social Personal 3% minimum career interest crediting rate Immediate vesting Individual SCP Participant Balances At retirement the SCP balance is converted to a guaranteed life annuity Security These provisions can be adjusted to fine-tune the balance between benefits and cost. Secure Choice Pension Savings including 401(k) s 4

SCP Estimated Income Replacement Entry Age Expected Social Security Replacement Ratio 1 ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT RATIOS WITH A 5% INTEREST CREDITING RATE Replacement Ratio from Expected Personal Savings Including 401(k) 2 Total Replacement Ratio with Social Security and Personal Savings Only Expected SCP Replacement Ratio 3 Total Replacement Ratio with SCP 25 30% 25% 55% 29% 84% 35 26% 18% 44% 21% 65% 45 17% 11% 28% 13% 41% 1 Calculated using 2011 Social Security bend points and assuming career earnings consistent with national average. For ages 35 and 45, thereplacement ratio is prorated to reflect the fraction of a participant s 35 years of covered earnings used in Social Security Primary Insurance Amount calculation which would be earned under their tenure with their current employer if they worked until age 65. 2 Calculated using assumed salary increases based on age, an average return of 5% per year, a contribution rate of 6% per year, retirement ofage 65, and annuity conversion based on PBGC annuity valuation assumptions. 3 Calculated using assumed salary increases based on age, and an expected credited interest rate of 5% per year. Retirement Income Replacement Gap: Surveys report individuals estimate 60% as adequate when 80% to 90% is needed. 5

3% 5% 7% SCP 3-5-7 3% minimum career interest crediting rate is the basis for the benefit 5% interest crediting rate is based on a US Treasury reported rate 7% is the long-term investment assumption used in the funding calculation Returns over 7% will be held in a reserve fund for payment of the crediting rate should plan experience be insufficient to meet the minimum credited interest rate Returns consistently in excess of 7% may be available to provide additional retiree benefits 6

SCP Funding: How It Works SCP funding takes a belt and suspenders approach for protection from adverse experience and flexibility in sharing the risk of underfunding. Four layers of protection are built in. Layer 1: Benefit Design as Shown Earlier Layer 2: The Annual Contribution Layer 3: The Dividend Reserve Fund (DRF) Layer 4: Termination or Withdrawal of An Employer LAYER 1 LAYER 2 LAYER 3 LAYER 4 7

SCP Sample Projections The following tables illustrate a sample projection of an employer group over a 10-year period The employer group assumes: 25 employees Ages uniformly distributed over the working career Average salary of $40,000 Modeled investment return and crediting rates are as shown in the tables 8

SCP Stress Test 1 The projection below models an investment market assuming the valuation assumptions as described earlier are exactly met. Effective Contribution % Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6.01% 6.03% 6.04% 6.04% 6.04% 6.03% 6.00% 5.99% 5.93% 5.89% 5.88% Funded % 100.00% 137.77% 138.12% 138.42% 138.68% 138.73% 139.20% 139.12% 140.41% 141.09% 140.38% Unfunded/ (Overfunded) Liability 0 (18,717) (39,644) (62,865) (88,463) (116,011) (146,953) (178,109) (216,429) (255,008) (286,433) DRF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Return 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% Total Payroll 1,000,000 1,035,181 1,071,091 1,107,363 1,144,006 1,181,031 1,210,979 1,240,228 1,247,629 1,268,236 1,290,993 9

SCP Stress Test 2 The projection below models an investment market using actual returns for the 1990 to 2000 period. Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Effective Contribution % 6.01% 6.04% 5.98% 5.98% 5.96% 6.00% 5.67% 5.45% 4.97% 4.51% 4.32% Funded % 100.00% 136.60% 140.12% 141.51% 142.51% 142.12% 140.52% 138.59% 134.23% 134.51% 139.30% Unfunded/ (Overfunded) Liability 0 (17,047) (40,455) (66,519) (95,704) (124,574) (150,316) (174,103) (181,973) (212,750) (277,111) DRF 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,062 32,012 76,994 121,387 152,960 Investment Return -- 2.45% 19.36% 7.37% 8.20% 4.08% 22.31% 14.72% 19.97% 17.13% 13.58% Total Payroll 1,000,000 1,035,181 1,071,091 1,107,363 1,144,006 1,181,031 1,210,979 1,240,228 1,247,629 1,268,236 1,290,993 10

SCP Sample Projection 3 The projection below models an investment market using actual returns for the 2000 to 2010 period. Effective Contribution % Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6.01% 6.05% 6.12% 6.25% 6.14% 6.12% 6.14% 6.05% 6.06% 6.74% 6.47% Funded % 100.00% 135.65% 133.60% 129.58% 130.08% 130.72% 131.27% 132.69% 135.56% 127.52% 127.38% Unfunded/ (Overfunded) Liability 0 (16,603) (33,879) (47,404) (67,731) (90,861) (116,011) (147,462) (189,025) (169,664) (193,094) DRF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Investment Return -- -1.25% -2.95% -8.39% 16.69% 7.73% 4.51% 10.17% 5.01% -16.30% 15.71% Total Payroll 1,000,000 1,035,181 1,071,091 1,107,363 1,144,006 1,181,031 1,210,979 1,240,228 1,247,629 1,268,236 1,290,993 11

States Massachusetts California New York Florida Ohio Connecticut Others 12

Small Businesses Favor or Oppose Now I am going to read you different components of a proposal to allow private sector workers to participate in a pension plan similar to the ones public employees get. Please listen to the whole thing, then I'll ask for your opinion about it. Under this proposal, people who work for private companies would have the opportunity to participate in a Secure Choice Pension, a new retirement plan modeled after the public employee pension system, and receive a guaranteed monthly pension benefit, like many public employees do, when they retire. Unlike a 401(k), employees would receive a guaranteed pension benefit of at least the amount they put in over time, plus any investment return. Employers could choose to simply give access to their employees, or contribute to the plan, or both. Instead of an individual account, the contributions would go into a large fund managed by a team of experienced investment professionals and overseen by an administrative board. The board would include representatives from the existing public employee pension system, representatives of participating employers, and representatives of participating employees. Contributions would be tax deferred meaning employees would pay no taxes on the money until they take it out. 13

Small business owners overwhelmingly support the Secure Choice Pension, regardless of whether or not they already provide a retirement benefit to their employees. The Secure Choice Plan Proposal All Small Business Benefits No Benefits 82 84 80 +69 +63 +67 15 15 17 18 5 2 20 4 15 5 Favor Oppose Don't Know Favor Oppose Favor Oppose Now, please tell me if you would favor or oppose this proposal having this type of retirement plan available for small private employers? [FAVOR/OPPOSE] Is that strongly or somewhat? 14

SCP Outreach Public pension stakeholders Plan sponsors, plans, unions/employee associations Defined benefit community ABC, EBRI, AARP Business and 401(k) industries Congress and the Administration The public 15

www.retirementsecurityforall.org Campaign to bring awareness and support for SCPs We want ordinary Americans telling elected officials to make SCPs a reality We want employers and employees who don t have pensions to say they want SCPs We want folks who have pensions to say we support working Americans to have SCPs 16

17

Thank You NCPERS 444 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 630 Washington, DC 20001 1-877-202-5706 www.retirementsecurityforall.org www.ncpers.org 18