IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. No.



Similar documents
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Case 1:13-cv Doc #1 Filed 09/30/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 6:13 cv Document 1 Filed 10/03/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

II. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS IN SUPPORT OF THIS CHARGE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII. Case No.: CV-06-00~CK-LEK

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ST ATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

-C12oo ~ESLIE:,:MILLER -. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA. THE STATE OF ARIZONA ex ref. TERRY. No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case: 5:14-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/08/14 1 of 14. PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

: : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

Case4:13-cv DMR Document1 Filed12/11/13 Page1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATURE OF THE ACTION

CASE 0:12-cv RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COpyFORCERTIFICATION

Plaintiffs, Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, Rebecca Weston, hereby accepts the Offer of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) )

Case 3:10-cv DRD Document 31 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 9

) Verified c-o-m-p-la-in-t- --;o~~&"-a~a~e~a6d4 0. Plaintiff, ) Demand for Jury Trial. Defendants. ) Over $25, ~)

Haro was at home with his family when they saw an intruder lurking in their backyard. When

JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE DIVISION. MELISSA ROWE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.R

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

Case 5:14-cv Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

Case 1:09-cv Document 1 Filed 12/10/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 07/23/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case: 4:15-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/29/15 Page: 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSIOURI EASTERN DIVISION

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE

Case 4:09-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 09/04/09 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff Henry Kent

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust ("Trust").

Case 2:02-cv WHA-SRW Document 1 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 5 , '\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

York); and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by

Case 3:15-cv LAB-BLM Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

S tj M M ONS UNION LEAGUE CLUB, PI ai nti ff Demands a Trial by Jury. Index No. Plaintiff, TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

Case 3:14-cv MMD-VPC Document 12-1 Filed 02/12/14 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:12-cv RLV-AJB Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Case No.: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANSHIP AND HABITABILITY. Plaintiffs,

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA V. CIVIL ACTION NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv RMB-AMD Document 1 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv DB Document 2 Filed 09/03/14 Page 1 of 10

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/04/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF

GUIDANCE ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR ALL EMPLOYERS IN NEW YORK STATE

UNITEDSTATESDISTRlCTCOURT ~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RlCHMOND DIVISION COMPLAINT

How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California

- Violations of 42 U.S.C. $ Supplemental State Claims

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA. v. Civil Action No.:CL Plaintiff Demands Trial by Jury COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ) ) ) FHEO No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOUSING DISCRIMINATION Get The Facts

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv NT Document 1 Filed 03/02/09 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

No. Plaintiff Kelvin Bledsoe ( Plaintiff ), by his undersigned counsel, brings claims

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH

A CONSUMER GUIDE TO FAIR LENDING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Woman From Being Fired From A Prison

MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT

Case 1:05-mc Document 158 Filed 10/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

Case5:09-cv JF Document30 Filed03/04/10 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Southern Arizona Legal Aid, Inc. Consumer Information February 2014

Case Number XXX I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Defendants E.G.O. and E.R.O., prepare immigration documents for customers for a

Plaintiff, : X. Nature of the Action. 1. This is an action for breach of a settlement agreement, retaliation

Minnesota False Claims Act

Landlords Prey on Poor Women by Extorting Sexual Favors in Lieu of Rent

Case 3:14-cv HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Transcription:

' 2 TERRY GODDARD The Attorney General Firm No. 14000 II Sandra R. Kane, No. 0042 4 IIAssistant Attorney General 125 West Washmgton 5 IIPhoenix, Arizona 8500 Telephone: (602) 542-8862 6 IICivi~Rights@azag.gov Attorneys for Plamtiff 8 9 i~~\ ( ~,?,>. ~. 1l.f~l.Y'.. "{ },,"'" ~'",,~,'.;gj 'It J! FE ' B' 9 D '>(;1<',"' 0 "vi.! ""r",.,,,. ".. t'''!'i,w;'?,j;'ol ~'-, -)c, i('""nfd. Ct"",.. '\~~:~!:?//I IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA (.:~~:~{~i.?h?r qi. 10 11 12 1 THE STATE OF ARIZONA ex ret. TERRY GODDARD, the Attorney General, and THE CNIL RIGHTS DIVISION OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF LAW, 14 Plaintiff, No. COMPLAINT (Non-Classified CVLUU8-0044 Civil) 15 16 vs. AUSTIN DEL CASTILLO, an unmarried man; 1 IIJANE DOES 1-10' JOHN DOES 1-10' ABC,, 18 II TRUSTS 1-10; XYZ BUSINESS ENTITIES, 20 Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiff, the State of Arizona ex rei. Terry Goddard, the Attorney General, and the 2 24 25 /II Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law (collectively "the State"), for its Complaint, alleges as follows: 1

INTRODUCTION 2 This is an action brought under the Arizona Fair Housing Act ("AFHA"), A.R.S. 41-1491 to 41-1491., to correct a discriminatory housing practice, provide appropriate 4 relief to an aggrieved person, and vindicate the public interest. Specifically, the State brings 5 this matter to redress the injury sustained when Defendant Austin Del Castillo sexually 6 harassed his subtenant, Sara Hesselbarth, thereby subjecting her to discriminatory tenns, conditions and privileges of housing, and intimidation and interference with her civil right not 8 to be discriminated against in housing based on sex. 9 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10 1. 11 12 2. This court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to A.R.S. 41-1491.4(A). Venue is proper in Maricopa County pursuant to A.R.S. 12-401(1). PARTIES 1. The Civil Rights Division of the Arizona Department of Law is an administrative 14 agency established by A.R.S. 41-1401 to enforce the provisions of the Arizona Civil Rights 15 16 Act ("ACRA"), A.R.S. 41-1401 to 41-149.02, including the AFHA. 4. The State brings this action on its own behalf and on behalf of Sara Hesse1barth 1 ("Hesselbarth") who is a complainant and an aggrieved person within the meaning of A.R.S. 18 41-1491(1) and (2). 5. Defendant Austin Del Castillo ("Del Castillo") is a resident of Maricopa County, 20 Arizona, and the tenant, sublessor and resident of that certain residential real property located at 21 102 E. EIParque Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85220 ("the Rental House"). The Rental House is a 22 single family home with four bedrooms. 2 6. Defendants JANE DOES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC TRUSTS 1-10, and 24 XYZ BUSINESS ENTITIES are fictitious names of individuals, trusts or entities who may 25 have liability for the matters alleged in this complaint. Plaintiff intends to amend the complaint when the true names of these fictitious defendants are known. 2

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 2. On or about January 0, 2006, Del Castillo entered into a Residential Rental Agreement ("the Lease") to lease the Rental House from the owner, Haskel Soffer ("Soffer"), a 4 resident of California, with a monthly rental amount of $1,95. Upon information and belief, 5 Del Castillo continued to occupy the Rental House on a month-to-monthbasis after expiration 6 of the original term of the Lease, and Del Castillo currently occupies the Rental House. 8. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Hesselbarth was a student at Arizona State 8 University ("ASU") in Tempe. 9 9. On or about June 200, Hesselbarth posted a personal advertisement ("the Ad") 10 on a campus on-line bulletin board indicating that she was seeking to rent a room at a house 11 close to the ASU campus. 12 10 Del Castillo responded to the Ad and indicated that he was a 2 year old college 1 student who had a room for rent. 14 11. Shortly thereafter, Hesselbarth went to seethe Rental House with her father and 15 learned that other female students had already subleased rooms at the Rental House. 16 12. On or about June 11, 200, Hesselbarth and Del Castillo entered into a written 1 agreement entitled Agreement and Rules under which Hesselbarth, as tenant, subleased a room 18. at the rental house from Del Castillo, as leaseholder, commencing July 1, 200 for the sum of $45 per month. Hesselbarth also paid a $100 deposit to Del Castillo. 20 1. The Agreement and Rules state that Hesselbarth and Del Castillo are aware that 21 the rules require them, among other things, to respect the other's privacy and be responsible at 22 all times. 2 14. On or about the evening of June 0, 200, Hesselbarth met Del Castillo at the 24 Rental House to pick up the key. Upon information and belief, Del Castillo attempted to kiss 25 Hesselbarth at that time. Hesselbarth told Del Castillo that his behavior was inappropriate, and Del Castillo apologized.

15. Upon information and belief, on or about July, 2008, Del Castillo stared at 2 Hesselbarth while she mopped the floor. 16. Upon information and belief, a few days after staring at Hesselbarth, Del Castillo 4 walked through the house without clothing and exposed himself to Hesselbarth. At that time, 5 Del Castillo told Hesselbarth that he had forgotten his clothes and was going to get them from 6 the dryer. 1. After Del Castillo got dressed, Hesselbarth told Del Castillo that his behavior in 8 going around the house without clothes was inappropriate in a house with three women. Del 9 Castillo responded that he had forgotten his towel. 10 18. Upon information and belief, on or about July 9, 200, Hesselbarth opened her 11 bedroom door and again saw Del Castillo standing in the nude in the hallway of the Rental 12 House. \\ThenHesselbarth asked Del Castillo why he was walking around the common areas of 1 the house with no clothes on, Del Castillo laughed and said that he had forgotten them. 14. Upon information and belief, after the second incident of seeing Del Castillo in 15 the nude in a little over a week, Hesselbarth spoke with the other women living at the Rental 16 House and learned that Del Castillo had engaged in inappropriate conduct of a sexual nature 1 towards the other women, including but not limited to walking around in the nude at the Rental 18 House. Hesselbarth also saw pornographic material displayed on Del Castillo's computer and learned that Del Castillo was nearly 0 years old and was not a student. 20 20. Fearing for her safety due to Del Castillo's inappropriate conduct, Hesselbarth 21 asked her then boyfriend, Trevor Lagger ("Lagger"), to stay with her overnight at the Rental 22 House on a few occasions. 2 21. Upon information and belief, Del Castillo told Hesselbarth that he was jealous of 24 Lagger. 25 4

22. Upon information and belief, on or about July, 200, Del Castillo told Lagger 2 that he could no longer visit Hesselbarth at the Rental House, and that Lagger could not park his car across the street from the Rental House. 4 2. On or about July 24, 200, Del Castillo told Hesselbarth that no guests of tenants 5 would be allowed at the Rental House in the future due to an incident two years earlier in which 6 a female tenant had been raped and assaulted at the Rental House. 24. On or about July 29, 200, Hesselbarth gave Del Castillo thirty days advance 8 written notice that she would be moving out of the Rental House by September 2, 200. 9 25. Although Hesselbarth paid the.full rent for the month of August on or about 10 August 1, 200, she moved out of the Rental House on or about August 6, 200 as a result of 11 Del Castillo's behavior. Upon information and belief, Hesselbarth's female roommates also 12 moved out of the Rental House as a result of Del Castillo's behavior. 1. On or about August 21, 200, Hesselbarth filed a complaint of housing 14 discrimination with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") against 15 Defendant Del Castillo. HUD forwarded Hesselbarth's housing discrimination complaint to the 16 State's Civil Rights Division ("the Division") for dual-filing under the AFHA and 1 investigation. 18 2. On or about August 24, 200, Hesselbarth filed a timely complaint of housing 20 discrimination with the Division pursuant to A.R.S. 41-1491.22(C), in which Hesselbarth alleged that she had been the victim of sex discrimination in housing by Defendant Del Castillo. 21 28. The State's Civil Rights Division investigated Hesselbarth's complaint pursuant 22 to A.R.S. 41-1491.24(B). At the conclusion of the State's investigation, the State issued a 2 finding ("the Cause Finding") that reasonable cause exists to believe that Defendant Del 24 Castillo discriminated against Hesselbarth based on sex, in violation of the AFHA. 25 29. The State issued the Cause Finding on January 0, 2008. Since that time, Hesselbarth and Defendant Del Castillo have not entered into a conciliation agreement. Having 5

exhausted administrative requirements, the State is authorized to file this Complaint pursuant to 2 A.R.S. 41-1491.29(D) and 41-1491.4(A). 4 COUNT ONE [Discrimination in Violation ofa.r.s. 41-1491.14(B) of AFHA] 5 0. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in 6 paragraphs 1 through 29 of this Complaint. 8 1. The Rental House isa dwelling within the meaning of A.R.S. 41-1491()(a) of the AFHA. 9 2. Defendant Del Castillo does not own the Rental House or have an ownership 10 interest in the Rental House. 11. Under A.R.S. 41-1491.14(B) of AFHA, a person may not discriminate against 12 any person in the terms, conditions or privileges of rental of a dwelling because of sex. 1 4. Defendant Del Castillo subjected Hesselbarth to unwelcome, offensive conduct 14 of a sexual nature because of her sex in violation of A.R.S. 41-1491.14(B) of AFHA. 15 5. As a result of discrimination by Defendant Del Castillo, Heselbarth suffered 16 emotional distress, humiliation, embarrassment, inconvenience, denial of civil rights, and 1 monetary damages. 18 6. Punitive damages are appropriate because Defendant Del Castillo intentionally discriminated against Hesselbarth because of her sex and/or Defendant acted with callous 20 disregard of or reckless indifference to Hesselbarth's civil rights. 21 COUNT TWO 22 [Discrimination in Violation of A.R.S. 41-1491.18 of AFHA] 2. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of paragraphs 1 24 through 6 of this Complaint. 25 6

8. Under A.R.S. 41-1491.18 of AFHA, a person may not coerce, intimidate, 2 threaten or interfere with any person in the exercise or enjoyment of any right granted or protected by A.R.S. 41-1491.18 and A.R.S. 41-1491.14. 4 9. Defendant Del Castillo intimidated Hesselbarth and interfered with her exercise 5 and enjoyment of her right to rent a room at the Rental House without discrimination on the 6 basis of sex, in violation of A.R.S. 41-1491.14 and 41-1491.18. 40. As a result of discrimination by Defendant Del Castillo, Hesselbarth suffered 8 emotional distress, humiliation, embarrassment, inconvenience, denial of civil rights, and 9 monetary damages. 10 41. Punitive damages are appropriate because Defendant Del Castillo intentionally II discriminated against Hesselbarth because of sex and/or Defendant acted with callous disregard 12 of or reckless indifference to Hesselbarth's civil rights. 1 WHEREFORE, the State requests that this Court: 14 A. Enter judgment on behalf of the State, fmding that Defendant unlawfully 15 discriminated against Hesselbarth because of sex, in violation of AFHA; 16 B. Enjoin Defendant from engaging in any housing practice that discriminates based 1 on sex or interferes with the exercise of rights granted by AFHA, as allowed by A.R.S. 41-18 1491.4(C); C. Order Defendant to make Hesselbarth whole for any damage she suffered and 20 award her damages in an amounuo be detennined at trial; 21 D. Award punitive damages against Defendant for his intentional discrimination 22 based on sex and/or his callous disregard or reckless indifference to Hesselbarth's civil rights; 2 E. Order the State to monitor Defendant's compliance with AFHA; 24 F. Award the State its costs incurred in bringing this action, and its costs in 25 monitoring Defendant's future compliance with AFHA, as allowed by A.R.S. 41-1491.4(C); and

G. Grant such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper in the 2 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 public interest.y--- DATED this l-r day.offebruary,2008. TERRY GODDARD Attorney General BY~~ andrar.kan~i -. Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division 125 W. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 8500 1 14 15 16 1 18 20 21 22 2 24 25 8