INDEX OF TEMPLATES INTRODUCING WHAT THEY SAY



Similar documents
They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing

THEY SAY: Reporting what authors are saying about a topic

EXAMPLE Why are so many college students mired in credit card debt? (title is essential question)

Writing = A Dialogue. Part I. They Say

AP Language Question 3--persuasive 2007 Exam Charitable Acts

Harvard College Program in General Education Faculty of Arts and Sciences Harvard University. A Guide to Writing in Ethical Reasoning 15

v. Civil Action No LPS

Directions for Narrative, Expository, and Descriptive Essays

Related guides: 'Planning and Conducting a Dissertation Research Project'.

FRIGALIMENT IMPORTING CO. v. B.N.S. INTERNATIONAL SALES CORP. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. 190 F. Supp.

Transitioning to College Writing Script

Active Learning in Accounting Classes: Three Literacy Strategies

CHAPTER 16: ADULTERY: THE BIBLICAL DEFINITION

Organizing an essay the basics 2. Cause and effect essay (shorter version) 3. Compare/contrast essay (shorter version) 4

Writing a Critical or Rhetorical Analysis

Methodological Issues for Interdisciplinary Research

Writing the Persuasive Essay

Writing Thesis Defense Papers

Construction Defects And 'The Space Between'

Vice President Public Relations CLUB OFFICER TRAINING

English 101, WB12: Academic Writing University of Maryland, College Park Summer Session I 2015 Course Policies

LAC CASE NO: JA 38/08 SANLAM LIFE INSURANCE LIMITED JUDGMENT. [1] Leave to appeal having been granted by the Labour Court, this is an

Five High Order Thinking Skills

AN OPINION COMPOSITION

Critical Study David Benatar. Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)


Integrating Quotes. How to do it.

Vice President Education CLUB OFFICER TRAINING

Opinion on Summary Judgment

Academic research is one of the key functions of business schools,

Introduction: Reading and writing; talking and thinking

CASE STUDY JAMES TUTTLE VS. LAKELAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE

MS Health Care Administration ( )

Writing the Literature Review / Using the Literature

April Comment Letter. Discussion Paper: Measurement Bases for Financial Accounting Measurement on Initial Recognition

THE METIER OF ERP PROJECT MANAGEMENT Successful Projects above all require Business-IT Leadership

Chapter 5, Learning to Think

Developing Critical Thinking Skills with The Colbert Report

A Note on the Optimal Supply of Public Goods and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation

SELECTING A COMPETENT FIRE RISK ASSESSOR

Sergeant at Arms CLUB OFFICER TRAINING

Tutor Notes - General

MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2007 question paper 9699 SOCIOLOGY. 9699/02 Paper 2 (Data Response), maximum raw mark 50

Murrell v Healy [2001] ADR.L.R. 04/05

Biological kinds and the causal theory of reference

The Importance of Citation

New Age Thinking and Worldview Attribution

Directions for Compare and Contrast

How to Save a Failing Project: Chaos to Control By Authors Ralph R. Young, Steven M. Brady, & Dennis C. Nagle, Jr. (A book review by R.

Does rationality consist in responding correctly to reasons? John Broome Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4 (2007), pp

Last May, philosopher Thomas Nagel reviewed a book by Michael Sandel titled

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS TO EFL LEARNERS

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

MILD DILEMMAS. Keywords: standard moral dilemmas, mild dilemmas, blame

The court held a hearing on March 27, 2008 to consider the application by

Bridging the Common Law Civil Law Divide in Arbitration

What is Undergraduate Education?

How to Write a Philosophy Paper

How To Blog About The Legality Of The U.S. Drone Program

A Short Course in Logic Zeno s Paradox

Argument Mapping 2: Claims and Reasons

HOW CAN THEY GET AWAY WITH THIS? Some Basic Information. For. Long Term Disability Clients

Nature and scope of public administration

Thesis Statement Script

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transitions between Paragraphs

November Thought Leaders: The Coming U.S. News & World Report Rankings of Undergraduate Teacher Education

Watson v. Price NO. COA (Filed 19 April 2011) Medical Malpractice Rule 9(j) order extending statute of limitations not effective not filed

Completing Your Dissertation Without Tears

Critical Analysis So what does that REALLY mean?

Building Metrics for a Process

)LQDQFLDO$VVXUDQFH,VVXHV RI(QYLURQPHQWDO/LDELOLW\

Literature Reviews. 1. What is a Literature Review?

Thesis and Dissertation Proposals. University Learning Centre Writing Help Ron Cooley, Professor of English

On the Paradox of the Question

Critical analysis. Be more critical! More analysis needed! That s what my tutors say about my essays. I m not really sure what they mean.

WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW

Teaching Non-Philosophy Faculty to Teach Critical Thinking about Ethical Issues. Peter Vallentyne and John Accordino, Virginia Commonwealth University

Abstract. Medical websites online are starting to take over the roles of doctors by providing ample

The Non-Lawyers Guide to Hearings before the State Engineer

Site Credibility. Grade Level: 4-8

In re PETITION OF STRATCAP INVESTMENTS, INC. [Cite as In re Petition of Stratcap Investments, Inc., 154 Ohio App.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-4589.

Manual on o Training Management

CONCERNING CONCERNING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Working and Still Poor. Sekia Dalton. Zane State College

Nancy Cartwright, Hunting Causes and Using Them: Approaches in Philosophy and Economics

Reviewing Essay Format

Transcription:

INDEX OF TEMPLATES INTRODUCING WHAT THEY SAY A number of sociologists have recently suggested that X s work has several fundamental problems. It has become common today to dismiss X s contribution to the field of sociology. In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques of Dr. X for. INTRODUCING STANDARD VIEWS Americans tend to believe that Conventional wisdom has it that Common sense seems to dictate that The standard way of thinking about Topic X has it that It is often said that My whole life I have heard it said that You would think that Many people assumed that MAKING WHAT THEY SAY SOMETHING YOU SAY I ve always believed that When I was a child, I used to think that Although I should know better by now, I cannot help thinking that. At the same time that I believe, I also believe INTRODUCING SOMETHING IMPLIED OR ASSUMED Although none of them has ever said so directly, my teachers have often given me the impression that One implication of X s treatment of is that Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that

INTRODUCING AN ONGOING DEBATE In discussions of X, one controversial issue has been On the one hand, argues On the other hand, contends Others even maintain My own view is When it comes to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of Whereas some are convinced that, others maintain that In conclusion, then, as I suggested earlier, defenders of can t have it both ways. Their assertion that is contradicted by their claim that CAPTURING AUTHORIAL ACTION X acknowledges that X agrees that X argues that X believes that X denies/does not deny that. X claims that X complains that X concedes that X demonstrates that X deplores the tendency to. X celebrates the fact that. X emphasizes that X insists that X observes that X questions that X refuses the claim that. X reminds us that X suggests that X urges us to INTRODUCING QUOTATIONS X states, As the prominent philosopher X puts it, According to X,

X herself writes, In his book,, X maintains that In X s view, X agrees/disagrees when she writes, X complicates matters further when he writes, EXPLAINING QUOTATIONS Basically, X is saying In other words, X believes In making this comment, X argues that X is insisting that X s point is that The essence of X s argument is that DISAGREEING, WITH REASONS I think X is mistaken because she overlooks X s claim that rests upon the questionable assumption that I disagree with X s view that because, as recent research has shown, X contradicts himself. On the one hand, he argues But on the other hand, he also says By focusing on, X overlooks the deeper problem of X claims, but we don t need him to tell us that. Anyone familiar with has long known that AGREEING WITH A DIFFERENCE I agree that because my experience confirms it. X surely is right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that

X s theory of is extremely useful because it sheds insight on the difficult problem of I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that it basically boils down to If group X is right that, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular assumption that AGREEING AND DISAGREEING SIMULTANEOUSLY Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that Though I concede that, I still insist that Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convinces me that instead. X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that I m of two minds about X s claim that On the one hand, I agree that On the other hand, I m not sure if My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support X s position that, but I find Y s argument about and Z s research on to be equally persuasive. SIGNALING WHO IS SAYING WHAT X argues According to both X and Y,

Politicians, X argues, should Most athletes will tell you that My own view, however, is that I agree, as X may not realize, that But are real and, arguably, the most significant factor in But X is wrong that However, it is simply not true that Indeed, it is highly likely that But the view that does not fit all the facts. X is right/wrong that X is both right and wrong that Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals Nevertheless, new research shows Anyone familiar with should see that EMBEDDING VOICE MARKERS X overlooks what I consider an important point about My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that ENTERTAINING OBJECTIONS Yet some readers may challenge the view that After all, many believe Indeed, my own argument that seems to ignore and Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion that

NAMING YOUR NAYSAYERS Here many feminists would probably object that But social Darwinists would certainly take issue with the argument that Biologists, of course, may want to dispute my claim that Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm X will probably dispute my claim that Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it s hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that MAKING CONCESSIONS WHILE STILL STANDING YOUR GROUND Although I grant that, I still maintain that Proponents of X are right to argue that But they exaggerate when they claim that While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that On the one hand, I agree with X that But on the other hand, I still insist that INDICATING WHO CARES used to think But recently [or within the past few decades] suggests that What this new research does, then, is correct the mistaken impression, held by many earlier researchers, that These findings challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that Recent studies like these shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed.

Researchers have long assumed that For instance, one eminent scholar of cell biology,, assumed in, her seminal work on cell structures and functions, that fat cells As herself put it, (200-). Another leading scientist,, argued that fat cells (200-). Ultimately, when it came to the nature of fat, the basic assumption was that But a new body of research shows that fat cells are far more complex and that If sports enthusiasts stopped to think about it, many of them might simply assume that the most successful athletes However, new research shows These findings challenge dieters common assumptions that At first glance, teenagers appear to But on closer inspection ESTABLISHING WHY YOUR CLAIMS MATTER X matters/is important because Although X may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over Ultimately, what is at stake here is These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about From They Say/I Say : The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, 2006.

COMMONLY USED TRANSITIONS Cause and Effect accordingly as a result consequently hence it follows, then since so then therefore thus Conclusion as a result consequently hence in conclusion, then in short in sum, then it follows, then so the upshot of all this is that therefore thus to sum up to summarize Comparison along the same lines in the same way likewise similarly Contrast although but by contrast conversely despite the fact that even though however in contrast nevertheless nonetheless on the contrary on the other hand regardless whereas while yet Addition also and besides furthermore in addition in fact indeed moreover so too Concession admittedly although it is true that granted I concede that of course naturally to be sure

Example after all as an illustration consider for example for instance specifically to take a case in point Elaboration actually by extension in short that is in other words to put it another way to put it bluntly to put it succinctly ultimately From They Say/I Say : The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, 2006.