EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL



Similar documents
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

County of Mono. Performance Evaluation System. Job Performance Expectations and Standards

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Staff Performance Evaluation

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Sample Performance Appraisal

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

Performance Appraisal

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

Job Description. Essential Job Functions and Responsibilities

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description. JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager

EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Performance Appraisal Core Values Behavior Descriptions as Tool for Rating Decisions

Utica College Performance Review Form

Performance Evaluation

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Employee Performance Review

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

Performance Communication Process Employee s Self-Evaluation

Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Job Description. Essential Job Functions and Responsibilities

FINANCE PORTABILITY SPECIALIST (Salary Range: $30,000-37,000)

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Employee Development Plan

Performance Evaluation for Exempt Employees Employer Instructions

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Compliance Director

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

Employee Performance Review

POLICE PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM INSTRUCTIONS

Management Performance Appraisal

Clinical Social Work Team Leader

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

How To Be A Team Member

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

EXAMPLE WORKPLACE COMPETENCIES

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Employee Support and Development Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies

Employee Performance Evaluation. I. Employee Information. Job Description. Attached.

UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SPA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL COMPARISON OF EXPECTATION LEVELS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES

Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

Sample Internship Forms

CAREER DEVELOPMENT OFFICER Training Needs Assessment Evaluation Form. Personal/Position Information

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0

University of Detroit Mercy. Performance Communication System (PCS)

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

JOB POSTING FY 14/15 MARCH 26, 2015 REVENUE ACCOUNTANT #3315 FINANCE DEPARTMENT

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development

Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff

INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Transcription:

Review 1/20/2012 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Employee Seniority Supervisor(s) Position Title Department Job Skills & Knowledge: Demonstrates professional skills and knowledge of the responsibilities and duties required to effectively function in the position including language, grammar, spelling, mathematics, reasoning and job-specific technical and/or procedural competencies. In certain positions this includes knowledge of University policies, rules, procedures and their supporting statutes. Employee understands the expectations of the position and remains current regarding new developments, technologies, methods, approaches and processes in the area of responsibility. Does not demonstrate the necessary skills and knowledge. Demonstrates limited understanding of necessary skills and knowledge. Demonstrates acceptable understanding of necessary skills and knowledge. Demonstrates complete understanding of necessary skills and knowledge. Demonstrates exceptional understanding of skills and knowledge. Quality of Work: Refers to accuracy, neatness, thoroughness and compliance with specifications according to departmental expectations and the requirements of the position. Employee listens to and understands the needs of the service recipient, whether inside or outside the University and responds to those needs; uses collaborative solutions in problem-solving as appropriate; delivers work product and services in a way that reflects credit upon the unit and the University. Employee exercises care to produce the standard the first time; readily detects, corrects or reports errors and applies feedback to improve performance. Work product is unacceptable. Work product requires constant revision and correction. Produces acceptable work product; requires some revision. Work is of very good quality; few revisions required. Work is of exceptionally high quality; virtually error free.

Quantity of Work/Planning & Management of Workload: Completes an acceptable volume of work and establishes appropriate priorities for fulfilling various job tasks. Demonstrates ability to set goals; plan job tasks in an efficient manner; utilize materials and equipment effectively; remain focused on work priorities; exhibit flexibility to meet changes in priorities and accommodate work interruptions. Consider timeliness in execution of assigned and agreed-upon tasks without sacrificing accuracy, quality or service recipient satisfaction. Work output is unsatisfactory; seldom meets deadlines and exhibits poor planning skills. Does not utilize resources effectively and fails to meet changes in priorities. Barely meets minimum workload requirements; occasionally meets deadlines; planning skills are limited. Resources can be utilized more effectively and changes in priorities can be better accommodated. Meets workload requirements; usually meets deadlines. Demonstrates acceptable planning skills. Resources are typically utilized effectively and changes in priorities are usually accommodated. Exceeds requirements for output; frequently meets deadlines. Demonstrates effective planning skills that allow for effective use of resources and changes in priorities. Greatly exceeds workload requirements; always on time or ahead of schedule. Demonstrates exceptional planning skills that consistently allow for changes in priorities and effective use of resources. Judgment: Anticipates and identifies problems; proposes and evaluates alternative solutions; is open to new or different solutions. Employee demonstrates maturity in taking or recommending appropriate actions and in determining which problems to handle independently and which to refer to supervisor personnel; follows up on requests for information and assistance. Consider employee s ability to make sound decisions and set priorities. Poor judgment. Is uncertain of own judgment; routinely defers to others. Generally uses good judgment. Demonstrates the ability to apply careful reasoning to recommendations/decision making. Reasoning is logical, clear and concise; comes to sound recommendations or conclusions quickly in support of office operations.

Initiative and Adaptability: The amount of direction needed to accomplish job responsibilities and tasks. The degree beyond the basic requirements the employee seeks to achieve and level to which employee anticipates the needs of the department and personnel. Displays a proactive approach to addressing change and adapts to a variety of assignments. Demonstrates a willingness to learn by suggesting, considering and applying new skills or methods in completing work assignments or projects. Employee responds appropriately/positively to feedback and suggestions for work improvement. Needs constant supervision to start and complete tasks with no anticipation of needs. Unable to accept change and adapt to change. Does not accept constructive feedback or suggestions for work improvement. Needs excessive guidance to finish tasks and minimal anticipation of needs. Has difficulty adapting to change and accepting feedback. Defensively questions constructive feedback and suggestions for work improvement. Demonstrates acceptable initiative; proceeds alone in performance of routine duties and assignments with expected anticipation of needs. Accepts suggestions, change, constructive feedback and suggestions for work improvement. Completes work on own initiative; resourceful and above average anticipation of needs. Willingly supports suggestions and change. Considers merit of constructive feedback and suggestions for work improvement. A self-starter in all respects; constantly seeks new techniques and methods to improve efficiency and has exceptional anticipation of needs. Enthusiastically accepts suggestions and change and proactively considers suggestions to accommodate changing office needs. Responds very positively to constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement. Attendance, Availability and Dependability: Employee assumes responsibility for regular and punctual attendance. Individual is at work area when scheduled and remains for duration of required hours in order to be available to perform responsibilities. Delivers on commitments made; acts in the best interest of the department served and the University. Undependable; absent or unavailable. Poor attendance, frequently absent or unavailable without proper notice. Acceptable attendance and availability. Dependable; sensitive to institution s need for availability. Excellent attendance and availability record.

Interpersonal & Communication Skills: Organizes and expresses ideas and information clearly, using appropriate and efficient methods of conveying the information. Contributes to a suitable communication environment by valuing the ideas and contributions of others. Demonstrates respect for all individuals regardless of their background or culture. Consider if employee establishes and maintains effective working relationships with people at all levels (supervisor, co-workers, students, external constituents, etc.) and exhibits a courteous and accommodating image. Is uncooperative with others and unable to work with others. Is tactless and discourteous. Aggressive approach frequently results in confrontations. Tends to be uncooperative. Needs to improve tact; aggressive approach occasionally results in miscommunication; reluctantly helpful. Cooperates with others; willing to compromise. Is generally tactful and courteous; usually able to communicate satisfactorily; willing to be helpful. Readily cooperates; promotes teamwork. Consistently courteous and tactful; able to communicate effectively; strives to be helpful. Very willing to cooperate with others; inspires positive work relations. Exceptionally tactful and courteous; has excellent communication skills; goes out of way to be helpful. Integrity: Exhibits strong work ethic, honesty and integrity in all aspects of the position. Employee is sensitive to confidentiality. Employee complies with all department and University policies, procedures and standards of conduct. Employee adheres to required federal and state employment regulations. Level of character and professional attitude maintained. Unethical, insensitive to confidentiality and does not comply with policies, procedures, standards of conduct and/or federal and state regulations. Occasionally engages in questionable behavior and at times is insensitive to confidentiality. Employee complies with policies, procedures, standards of conduct and/or federal and state regulations most of the time. Is ethical and sensitive to confidentiality. Complies with policies, procedures, standards of conduct and/or federal and state regulations. Takes extra measures to maintain ethical behavior and ensure confidentiality. Always complies with policies, procedures, standards of conduct and/or federal and state regulations. Exceptional work ethic, integrity and sensitivity to confidentiality. Strives to determine if there would be any potential way to breach confidentiality of information. Takes extra care not to violate policies, procedures, standards of conduct and/or federal and state regulations. Serves as role model.

Review of Past Year Goals/Objectives For the current performance period, summarize employee s major accomplishments and/or areas where goals were not met. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Goals/Objectives State specific position duties and responsibilities that employee needs to correct, improve, achieve or acquire during the next evaluation period. Please indicate timetable if goals/objectives are to be achieved in a period of time different than the next 12-month period. There should be mutual discussion, understanding and agreement (when possible) between employee and supervisor that these goals/objectives are important and will be used as a basis for performance evaluation. Attach additional sheets if necessary. All employees must sign their performance appraisal to show they have read it. Signing does not mean that the employee necessarily agrees with the contents. I understand the contents of this performance review. I understand, but disagree with the contents of this performance review.** I do not understand the contents of this review. ** **Employee concerns regarding this evaluation may be addressed in the Employee Comments section below or submitted to the Human Resource Department as a separate addendum. Employee Comments:

SIGNATURES Employee Signature Evaluator Signature Supervisor Signature** Dean/Director/Administrator Signature **It is the responsibility of the employee s immediate supervisor to review and explain the results of the performance review with the employee. The Dean/Director will also review, approve and sign the appraisal. If the Dean/Director/Administrator does not approve the performance appraisal, it will be returned to the supervisor for reassessment of the employee s performance. NOTE: Original form should be signed by supervisor, employee and, if applicable, Dean/Director/Administrator and returned to the Human Resource Department. Employee and supervisor should retain copies. HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT 1501 W BRADLEY AVE PEORIA, IL 61625 (309) 677-3223 FAX (309) 677-3867