UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20217 PRESS RELEASE



Similar documents
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 14-BG-607

RULES FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MISSOURI S LAWYER DISCIPLINE SYSTEM

BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT. Parties and Appearance

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO. 99- IN THE MATTER OF GREGORY B. DUNBAR

STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES. Case Nos.: 13-O DFM ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SEATTLE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AMERICAN INN OF COURT ETHICS MAY 21, 2015

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.

Attorneys convicted of crimes.

(l) IN THE MATTER OF $ ROBERT EUGENE EASLEY $ CAUSE NO. 4677s srate BAR CARD NO $ DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT

RULE 89. WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS; VISITING LAWYERS; TEMPORARY PRACTICE WITH LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS

SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO

In the Matter of Thomas J. Howard, Jr. O R D E R. This matter is before the court pursuant to a petition for reciprocal discipline filed by this

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF BRUCE MICHAEL FRIEDMAN ORDER. On this day, the Court considered the Motion for Acceptance of

shl Doc Filed 11/20/13 Entered 11/20/13 11:33:51 Main Document Pg 1 of 5

2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 13. September Term, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND WILLIAM M.

MCKINNEY'S NEW YORK RULES OF COURT COURT OF APPEALS PART 521. RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE LICENSING OF LEGAL CONSULTANTS.

FACT SHEET Contact: Office of Legislative and Public Affairs (703) Fax: (703) Feb.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION. v. Civil Action Number: 6:09cv9

Rule 1A:8. Military Spouse Provisional Admission.

IT IS ORDERED that the law license of Jose Sotolongo of Houston, Texas, State Bar

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 19 - ATTORNEYS CHAPTER ADMISSION TO THE BAR. Rule SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY SPOUSE ATTORNEYS

NO. D AGREED JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION

(c) Admission Without Examination of Members of the Bar of Other Jurisdictions.

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 7, 2013, the Petition for

: : before this court (the Court Annexed Mediation Program ); and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 112,569. In the Matter of LUCAS L. THOMPSON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

BEFORE THE LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA STATEMENT OF CHARGES

VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE THIRD DISTRICT COMMITTEE, SECTION III, OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISTRICT COMMITTEE DETERMINATION (PUBLIC REPRIMAND WITH TERMS)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Inquiry Concerning A Florida Lawyer

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C April 24, 2015 PRESS RELEASE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

People v. Verce. 11PDJ076, consolidated with 12PDJ028. June 11, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Joseph James

How To Get A $1,000 Filing Fee From A Bankruptcy Filing Fee In Arkansas

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERhECEIVED ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF n THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

BILL NO Thirty-first Legislature of the Virgin Islands. November 23, 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,258. In the Matter of BART A. CHAVEZ, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE

11/20/2009 "See News Release 073 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 09-B-1795 IN RE: DEBORAH HARKINS BAER

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Texas Lawyer Discipline - A Summary

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 13-BG-52

NEW MEXICO BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION AN AGENCY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO STANDARDS FOR LEGAL SPECIALIZATION WORKERS COMPENSATION LAW

A. Accredited law school means a law school either provisionally or fully approved and accredited by the American Bar Association.

Multijurisdictional Practice of Law for In-House Counsel

ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC. DOCKET NO IN THE MATTER OF WALTER JOHN KOWALSKI

Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se

BANKRUPTCY AND DEBTOR-CREDITOR LAW SPECIALIZATION ADVISORY BOARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR CERTIFICATION, RECERTIFICATION AND DECERTIFICATION

HOUSTON LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICE, INC. RULES OF MEMBERSHIP

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saladin Eric Shakir, Misc. Docket AG No. 8, September Term, 2009

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. In re: JEFFERY W. POTTER, No MS

FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL APPLICATION CHAPTER 20, RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Plaintiff

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Associate Justices of. This matter came before us on a certification of default

[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Schiff, 139 Ohio St.3d 456, 2014-Ohio-2573.]

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION UNDER RULE SPECIAL ADMISSION EXCEPTION FOR MILITARY LAWYERS

OFFICE OF CHIEF DISCIPLINARY C ROSS A ANNENBERG 100 WASHINGTON STREET ELLIS LAW OFFICES HARTFORD CT PLEASANT STREET WORCESTER MA 01609

PROCEDURES FOR ADMISSION TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT BAR

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

[Cite as Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Cameron, 130 Ohio St.3d 299, 2011-Ohio-5200.]

RULES OF THE U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice.

Application for Admission to Limited Practice as Attorney Under APR 8(g) Exception for Military Lawyers

By-Laws of The Clermont County Bar Association

UNDERSTANDING TEXAS LAWYER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE AND HOW TO AVOID IT

RULES RELATING TO CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION

SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM PREAMBLE. The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to

HEALTH EMERGENCY ACT

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D42594 G/htr

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D28221 G/kmg

CHAPTER 20. FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE NC STATE BAR 05 DHC 4 & II RD 3 NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wolanin, 121 Ohio St.3d 390, 2009-Ohio-1393.]

02/26/2014 "See News Release 013 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0061 IN RE: KEISHA M.

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

ABA MODEL RULE FOR THE LICENSING AND PRACTICE OF FOREIGN LEGAL CONSULTANTS

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : :

FILED November 9, 2007

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT RICHARD VAN HOUTEN, JR.; STEPHEN HALL,

MINNESOTA CERTIFIED PARALEGAL APPLICATION I. PERSONAL INFORMATION. Name: Former Name(s): Date of Birth: Mailing Address: City/State/Zip:

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 11,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term. No LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner. JOHN P. SULLIVAN, Respondent

Peter Tom, Justice Presiding, Angela M. Mazzarelli Eugene Nardelli Luis A. Gonzalez Bernard J. Malone, Jr., Justices.

ETHICS & THE NEW RULES

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Weiss, 133 Ohio St.3d 236, 2012-Ohio-4564.]

Transcription:

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20217 September 5,2014 PRESS RELEASE The Chief Judge of the United States Tax Court announced today that the following practitioners have been disciplined by the United States Tax Court for reasons explained in an order issued in the case of each practitioner. Copies of the orders are attached. 1. Montgomery W. Cobb 2. James A. Endicott, Jr. 3. Lorenzo C. Fitzgerald, Jr. 4. Ellis Scott Frison, J r. 5. W. Christopher Hodge 6. Ralph E. Lerner Attadunents

UN TAX COU WASHINGTON, DC 20217 In re: W. Cobb By entered with suspended the dated March 5, for 1 the that 201 and he was 30 days. Cobb The Court. instructed Mr. 2014, and to appear, scheduled a.ill. On June 14, the 's response Order to Show at the scheduled on July 16, 29, Upon consideration cause, it is ORDERED the Court's to Show absolute in Procedure, order of See Rule 202( ), for reinstatement procedures. It is further who has of SERVED 052014

- 2 ORDERED that Mr. Cobb's practitioner access to case files maintained by the Court in electronic form, if any such access was given to him, is hereby revoked. It is further ORDERED that, until reinstated, Mr. Cobb is prohibited from holding himself out as a member of the Bar of the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that the Court will file orders to withdraw Mr. Cobb as counsel in all pending cases in which he appears as counsel of record. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Cobb shall, with 20 days of service of this order upon him, surrender to this Court his certificate of admission to practice before this Court. By the Court: (Signed) Michael 8. Thornton Michael B. Thornton Chief Judge Dated: Washington, D.C. September 5,2014

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 In re: James A. Endicott, Jr. ORDER OF DISBARMENT By order dated December 10, 20l3, the Supreme Court of Texas, accepted Mr. Endicott's resignation as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of Texas. The Supreme Court oftexas took such action after reviewing Mr. Endicott's Motion for Acceptance of Resignation as Attorney and Counselor at Law in Lieu of Disciplinary Action, and the Response to Motion filed by the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel for the Commission for Lawyer Discipline. The order of the Supreme Court of Texas states that the court deems Mr. Endicott's professional misconduct, as detailed in the Response to Motion, conclusively established for all purposes. Additionally, Mr. Endicott failed to inform the Chair of this Court's Committee on Admissions, Ethics, and Discipline of the order ofthe Supreme Court of Texas dated December 10, 20l3, within 30 days, as required by Rule 202(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on May 29, 2014, affording Mr. Endicott the opportunity to show cause, if any, why he should not be suspended or disbarred from practice before this Court, or otherwise disciplined. The Order to Show Cause instructed Mr. Endicott to (1) submit a written response to the order on or before June 27, 2014, and (2) notify the Court in writing on or before June 27,2014, of his intention to appear, in person or by counsel, at a hearing concerning his proposed discipline scheduled before the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20217, at 10:00 a.m. on July 16,2014. The Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, 2014, was mailed to Mr. Endicott by both certified and regular mail. The United States Postal Service website indicates that the certified mailing was delivered on June 6, 2014. The copy of the Order to Show Cause mailed by regular mail has not been returned to the Court. The Court has received no response from Mr. Endicott to the Order to Show Cause, issued May 29,2014, nor has the Court received by June 27, 2014, notice ofmr. Endicott's intention to appear at the scheduled hearing. SERVED SEP 0 s 2014

- 2 Upon due consideration and for cause, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, 2014, is hereby made absolute in that, under the provisions of Rule 202, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, Mr. Endicott is forthwith disbarred from further practice before the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Endicott's name is hereby stricken from the list of practitioners who are admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court, and his practitioner access to case files maintained by the Court in electronic form, if any such access was given to him, is hereby revoked. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Endicott is hereby prohibited from holding himself out as a member of the Bar of the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that the Court will file orders to withdraw Mr. Endicott as counsel in all pending cases in which he appears as counsel of record. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Endicott shall, within 20 days of service of this order upon him, surrender to this Court his certificate of admission to practice before this Court. By the Court: (Signed) Michael B. Thomton Michael B. Thornton Chief Judge Dated: Washington, D.C. September 5, 2014

UNITED TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 re: Lorenzo. Jr. order the of Columbia Court Appeals, filed March 2014, Mr. Fitzgerald was suspended the of law in the of Columbia, pending disposition of disciplinary before that Mr. Fitzgerald failed inform Court's Admissions, and Discipline the entry the District Columbia Court Appeals, within 30 Tax Court Rules and Procedure. The issued an Order to Show on May 2014, Mr. show if any, he should not suspended this Court, or disciplined. Order (1) submit a the Court in writing on or or by counsel, at a hearing discipline scheduled the States Court, 20217, on July 1 2014, at 10:00 a.m. to Show Cause,. 2014, was mailed to Mr. F and copy Order to Show was returned to Court by United to S Unclaimed - to by regular mail has not Postal Service. has no the to Show issued May 29, the Court by 27,2014, notice appear scheduled o52014

- 2 Upon due consideration and for cause, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, 2014, is hereby made absolute in that, under the provisions of Rule 202, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, Mr. Fitzgerald is forthwith suspended from practice before the United States Tax Court, until further order of the Court. A practitioner who has been suspended may apply for reinstatement. See Rule 202( ), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, for reinstatement procedures. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Fitzgerald's practitioner access to case files maintained by the Court in electronic form, if any such access was given to him, is hereby revoked. It is further ORDERED that, until reinstated, Mr. Fitzgerald is prohibited from holding himself out as a member of the Bar of the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that the Court will file orders to withdraw Mr. Fitzgerald as counsel in all pending cases in which he appears as counsel of record. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Fitzgerald shall, within 20 days of service of this order upon him, surrender to this Court his certificate of admission to practice before this Court. By the Court: Dated: Washington, D.C. September 5,2014 (Signed) Michael B. Thornton Michael B. Thornton Chief Judge

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 In re: Ellis Scott Frison, Jr. ORDER OF DISBARMENT By order filed July 25, 2013, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals suspended Mr. Frison from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, pending further order of the court. Thereafter, by opinion and order issued on April 24, 2014, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, per curiam, disbarred Mr. Frison from the practice oflaw in the District of Columbia. Also, by order filed February 18,2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suspended Mr. Frison from the practice of law before that court, pending further order of the court. Additionally, Mr. Frison failed to inform the Chair of this Court's Committee on Admissions, Ethics, and Discipline, within 30 days, as required by Rule 202(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, of (1) the entry of the July 25,2013, order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals; (2) the entry of the April 24, 2014, opinion and order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals; and (3) the filing of the February 18,2014, order of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on May 29, 2014, affording Mr. Frison the opportunity to show cause, if any, why he should not be suspended or disbarred from practice before this Court, or otherwise disciplined. The Order to Show Cause instructed Mr. Frison to (1) submit a written response to the order on or before June 27, 2014, and (2) notify the Court in writing on or before June 27, 2014, of his intention to appear, in person or by counsel, at a hearing concerning his proposed discipline scheduled before the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20217, at 10:00 a.m. on July 16,2014. The Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, 2014, was mailed to Mr. Frison by both certified and regular mail. The copy of the Order to Show cause mailed by certified mail was returned to the Court by the United States Postal Service, the envelope marked "Return to Sender - Attempted - Not Known - Unable to Forward - Return to Sender". The copy of the Order to Show Cause mailed by regular mail was returned to the Court by the United States Postal Service, the envelope marked, "Return to Sender - Not at this Address". The Court has received no response from Mr. Frison to the Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, SERVED SEP 0 52014

2 2014, nor has the Court to appear at Upon ORDERED that hereby made absolute in Practice and Procedure, Mr. before the United ORDERED that Mr. practitioners who are admitted his practitioner access to case any such access was given to 201 of Mr. Frison's intention it is May 29, 201 is Court Rules practice from the list of United States Tax Court, and Cu.UJ.vu by the Court in electronic form, if It is further ORDERED that Mr. prohibited from holding himself out as a member of Bar of the Court. It is further ORDERED in all pending cases in which upon him, Court. to withdraw Mr. Frison as counsel of record. It is further 20 of service of this order of admission to practice before this the Court: (Signed) Michael B. Thornton Michael B. Thornton Chief Judge Dated:

UNITED STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 In re: W. Christopher Hodge ORDER OF DISBARMENT By order filed November 20,2012, the Supreme Court of Missouri, en bane, disbarred Mr. Hodge, by consent, from the practice of law in the State of Missouri. Additionally, Mr. Hodge failed to inform the Chair of this Court's Committee on Admissions, Ethics, and Discipline of the entry of the November 20,2012 order of the Supreme Court of Missouri, within 30 days, as required by Rule 202(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on May 29, 2014, affording Mr. Hodge the opportunity to show cause, if any, why he should not be suspended or disbarred from practice before this Court, or otherwise disciplined. The Order to Show Cause instructed Mr. Hodge to (1) submit a written response to the order on or before June 27,2014, and (2) notify the Court in writing on or before June 27, 2014, of his intention to appear, in person or by counsel, at a hearing concerning his proposed discipline scheduled before the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20217, at 10:00 a.m. on July 16,2014. The Order to Show Cause, issued May 29, 2014, was mailed to Mr. Hodge by both certified and regular mail. The United States Postal Service website indicates that the copy of the Order to Show Cause mailed by certified mail was forwarded to West Sacramento, California, but does not show that the letter was.'") delivered, nor has the certified mailing been returned to the Court. The copy of the Order to Show Cause mailed by regular mail has not been returned to the Court by the United States Postal Service. On July 29, 2014, the Court sent another copy of the Order to Show Cause to Mr. Hodge by United States Postal Service Express Mail. The United States Postal Service website indicates that this copy was delivered in Sacramento, California, on August 1,2014. The Court has received no response from Mr. Hodge to the Order to Show Cause, issued May 29,2014, nor has the Court received by June 27, 2014, notice of Mr. Hodge's intention to appear at the scheduled hearing. SERVED SEP 0 52014

-2 Upon due consideration and for cause, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause, issued May 29,2014, is hereby made absolute in that, under the provisions of Rule 202, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, Mr. Hodge is forthwith disbarred from further practice before the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Hodge's name is hereby stricken from the list of practitioners who are admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court, and his practitioner access to case files maintained by the Court in electronic fonn, if any such access was given to him, is hereby revoked. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Hodge is hereby prohibited from holding himself out as a member of the Bar of the United States Tax Court. It is further ORDERED that the Court will file orders to withdraw Mr. Hodge as counsel in all pending cases in which he appears as counsel of record. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Hodge shall, within 20 days of service of this order upon him, surrender to this Court his certificate of admission to practice before this Court. By the Court: (Signed) Michael B. Thornton Michael B. Thornton Chief Judge Dated: Washington, D.C. September 5,2014

UN STATES TAX COURT WASHINGTON, DC 20217 re: Ralph By decision Slip Op. 07000 (Oct. 29, 201 Mr. Lerner was suspended law in the ofnew a period of one effective November 28, 13. The issued an on March 19, 14, affording the opportunity to show should suspended or from before this or disciplined. Order to Show instructed Mr. Lerner to (1) submit a response to order on or before 22,2014, (2) notify Court in on or. 22, 14, ofhis HL"-'AHA to in person or by counsel, at a hearing vul'v,",,' his proposed scheduled the States Street, N.W., D.C. 2021 on July 1 2014, at 10:00 a.m. On Court Mr. Lerner's response to March 1 2014, through counsel, wherein notice Mr. s appear the and proposed that a "temporary suspension imposed on consent." Subsequently, on 17, 2014, the Court Mr. s further to the 19, 201 Order to Show Cause, through counsel, notifying Court that Mr. does oppose a suspension practice this Court, with the opportunity to seek reinstatement to Rule 202( ), Court of Practice Procedure, and that Mr. cancelled to the scheduled hearing on July 16,2014. Upon consideration for it is hereby ORDERED that Court's 19, 201 is hereby under the provisions Court Rules Practice is forthwith practice SERVED o52014

2 United UVHUVU Court, until further may apply for and Procedure, Court. A practitioner who Rule 202(f), Tax Court procedures. It is further that Mr. Lerner's ~"""J'LVL access to case files electronic form,' any access was given to him, is hereby further by that, until reinstated, Mr. as a member of the Bar prohibited from H'VL...LU 'TOT""'" Tax Court. It is that the Court will cases in which he appears.lj.l"-.ljlj "rrlprc to withdraw Mr. Lerner as as of record. It is further that Mr. Lerner shall, with 20 days of service of this to this Court his admission to practice the Court: (Signed) Michael B. Thornton Washington, D.C. 5,2014 Michael B. Thornton Judge