Compliance. TODAY November 2012. Meet Urton Anderson

Similar documents
Using the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) PEPPER to Support Auditing and Monitoring Efforts: Session 1

Session 3: How to Use and Obtain PHP PEPPER and Helpful Resources

See page 16. Billing compliance for non-physician providers: Understanding the CMS billing regulations. Debbie Bohr

RAC Lessons Learned Medicare s s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program

Developing Successful Hospital Partnerships

How Hospitals Can Arm Themselves in the War on Waste By Helen Blumen, MD, MBA, and Tiffanie Lenderman, MBA, MSHA

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide. Results of AHA RACTRAC Survey, 4 th Quarter 2012

CMS Updates. CMS Releases FY 2015 Proposed IPPS. Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (H.R. 4302)

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist Examination Content Outline

HFMA s Revenue Cycle Forum

Revenue Cycle Management Practice

Experiences with CGI in RAC Region B. National RAC Summit March 5, 2010 Betsy Hall, MPH, CHC Compliance Officer & Privacy Officer

Be on Target, Not a Target: Surviving the Ongoing Focus on Medical Necessity and Short Stays

SECTION 4 COSTS FOR INPATIENT HOSPITAL STAYS HIGHLIGHTS

Supplemental Technical Information

Overview of Hospital Utilization Review

FY2015 Final Hospital Inpatient Rule Summary

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS CENTRAL MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS NORTHEAST MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

Stroke Coding Issues Presentation to: NorthEast Cerebrovascular Consortium

Monitoring Coding Compliance

Clarification of Patient Discharge Status Codes and Hospital Transfer Policies

UnitedHealthcare Medicare Solutions Readmission Review Program for Medicare Advantage Plans

The Why and How of a CDI Program. Deb Neville, RHIA, CCS-P, Elsevier/MC Strategies Donna Bonno, CPC- CPC-I, QuadraMed September 12, 2012

Figuring Out the Codes: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities and the Transfer Policy

PHC4 35 Diseases, Procedures, and Medical Conditions for which Laboratory Data is Required Effective 10/1/2015

THE VALUE OF A COMPLETE CODING QUALITY AUDIT PROGRAM. By Lisa Marks, RHIT, CCS, Coding Audit Director, Precyse

Postacute Care Transfer Rule Review. HFMA Northern California COMPLIANCE WEBINAR SERIES California Statewide Webinar February 2012.

Module 9: Diseases of the Endocrine System and Nutritional Disorders Exercises

Deloitte Center for Regulatory Strategies. Balancing act Can hospital CFOs square their medical necessity risks with revenue goals? Here s how.

Moving Towards Bundled Payment

Inpatient Transfers, Discharges and Readmissions July 19, 2012

MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS WESTERN MA. Acute Care Hospital Utilization Trends in Massachusetts FY

Using Medicare Hospitalization Information and the MedPAR. Beth Virnig, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Research and Professor University of Minnesota

EFFECT OF THE HOME HEALTH PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM

STATISTICAL BRIEF #185

How to Prepare a Winning RAC Appeal

See page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++

The Top 20 ICD-10 Documentation Issues That Cause DRG Changes

HEALTH CARE AUDITING & MONITORING TOOLS

Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis

benchmarking tools for reducing costs of care

All Patient Refined DRGs (APR-DRGs) An Overview. Presented by Treo Solutions

Reducing Readmissions with Predictive Analytics

Don t Underestimate the Impact of MS-DRGs on Your Bottom Line

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide. Results of AHA RACTRAC Survey, 2 nd Quarter 2012

Note: This article was updated on January 3, 2013, to reflect current Web addresses. All other information remains unchanged.

Understanding October 1 st MDS Changes and PEPPER Letters 2013

September 4, Submitted Electronically

Continuous Quality Monitoring

Patient Criteria: Modeling in LTRAX

Get With The Guidelines - Stroke PMT Special Initiatives Tab for Ohio Coverdell Stroke Program CODING INSTRUCTIONS Effective

Estimating the Impact of the Transition to ICD-10 on Medicare Inpatient Hospital Payments

How Will Hospital Readmission Penalties Impact Skilled Nursing Facilities?

Little Ado (yet) About Much (money)

Reviewing Hospital Claims for Inpatient Status: The 2-Midnight Benchmark

2.b.vii Implementing the INTERACT Project (Inpatient Transfer Avoidance Program for SNF)

Site-neutral payments for select conditions treated in inpatient rehabilitation facilities and skilled nursing facilities

Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Planning for the Permanent Program. HFMA Southern California August 14, 2008

Mean Duration (days) ± SD b. n = 587 n = 587

Recovery Auditors and Fee-for-Service Medicare DIVISION OF RECOVERY AUDIT OPERATIONS CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES

CARE GUIDELINES FROM MCG

Regulatory Compliance Policy No. COMP-RCC 4.32 Title:

STATISTICAL BRIEF #168

Optum s Role in Mycare Ohio

Indiana Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Complex Reviews Webinar February 15, 2013

West Penn Allegheny Health System

Medicare s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program

Long term care coding issues for ICD-10-CM

The Big Data Dividend

Over 50% of hospitalized patients are malnourished. Coding for Malnutrition in the Adult Patient: What the Physician Needs to Know

Reviewing Hospital Claims for Patient Status: Admissions On or After October 1, 2013 (Last Updated: 11/27/13)

MEDICARE INAPPROPRIATELY PAID HOSPITALS INPATIENT CLAIMS SUBJECT TO THE POSTACUTE CARE TRANSFER POLICY

A Project to Reengineer Discharges Reduces 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rates. April 11, 2014

How To Write An Hm Compliance Program

Regulatory Compliance Policy No. COMP-RCC 4.07 Title:

THE MEDICARE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES NEEDS TO BE REEVALUATED

Medicare Savings and Reductions in Rehospitalizations Associated with Home Health Use

VantagePoint. Mistaken Admission: Establishing Medical Necessity for Inpatient Procedures. Defining Medical Necessity page 2

REHAB RULES REVISITED

Reimbursement for Medical Products: Ensuring Marketplace

What do ACO s and Hospitals want from SNF s and CCRC s

Using data analytics to assist in compliance auditing and monitoring

Physician and other health professional services

Coding & Alan L. Plummer, MD Editor

Two-Midnight Short-Stay Reviews Kick-off Webinar

Preparing for the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program

Medicare Prospective Payment System Transfers Reported as Left Against Medical Advice Hospital Discharges (A )

Inpatient rehabilitation facility services

STATISTICAL BRIEF #172

FY2015 Proposed Hospital Inpatient Rule Summary

Patient Optimization Improves Outcomes, Lowers Cost of Care >

PREPARING THE PATIENT FOR TRANSFER TO AN INPATIENT REHABILITATON FACILITY (IRF) University Hospitals 8th Annual Neuroscience Nursing Symposium

Hospital Client Alert H EALTH M ANAGEMENT A SSOCIATES. January 2009 RAC A UDITS. HMA Team. RAC Overview

CHANGING YOUR CASE MANAGEMENT MODEL OF CARE. Jan Lear, RN, CMC Director of Case Management MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center

Lead. Follow. Or get out of the way.

NRH Medical Rehabilitation Network Adding Life to Years

Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Quality Reporting Program Train-the-Trainer Conference. May 2, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 1

MONTANA. Downloaded January 2011

Transcription:

Compliance TODAY November 2012 a publication of the health care compliance association www.hcca-info.org Meet Urton Anderson Clark W. Thompson Jr. Professor in Accounting Education McCombs School of Business The University of Texas at Austin See page 16 24 Using comparative data to support compliance efforts Kimberly Hrehor, Marianne Lundgren and Dan McCullough 30 Bake compliance into the business Josh Axelrod 34 Medicaid deficiencies as conditions of payment? Susan E. Nance 38 Developing engaging and impactful compliance training for stakeholders Laura Wenzel This article, published in Compliance Today, appears here with permission from the Health Care Compliance Association. Call HCCA at 888-580-8373 with reprint requests.

by Kimberly Hrehor, MHA, RHIA, CHC; Marianne Lundgren, RHIA, CCS; and Dan McCullough, RN, CHC Using comparative data to support compliance efforts PEPPER is a free report summarizing Medicare claims data in areas prone to improper Medicare payments. A provider s claims data statistics are compared to other providers in the state, MAC jurisdiction, and nation. PEPPER can be used to identify when a provider may be at higher risk for improper Medicare payments. Providers should assess their PEPPER and consider internal and external factors that may contribute to higher billing patterns. More information on PEPPER is available at www.pepperresources.org Kimberly Hrehor (Khrehor@txqio.sdps.org) is Project Director, and Marianne Lundgren (Mlundgren@txqio.sdps.org) and Dan McCullough (dmccullough@txqio.sdps.org) are Program Specialists with TMF Health Quality Institute in Austin, Texas. Do you work for any of these provider types? Short-term acute care hospital Long-term acute care hospital Critical access hospital Inpatient psychiatric facility Inpatient rehabilitation facility Hospice Partial hospitalization program If the answer is yes, chances are your facility receives a free report that can help identify areas that may be at risk for improper Medicare payments. It s called the Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report, or PEPPER. PEPPER, produced by TMF Health Quality Institute (TMF), is a report that summarizes Medicare claims data statistics for areas that may be at risk for improper Medicare payments. PEPPERs have been available for short-term acute care hospitals and long-term acute care hospitals for several years; more recently, they have been available for critical access hospitals, inpatient psychiatric facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, hospices, and partial hospitalization programs. The PEPPER for each type of provider has been customized, as the risk areas vary for different provider types. (See sidebar for target areas for each setting). PEPPER summarizes the Medicare claims statistics for one provider. You Hrehor may think: I can calculate my own claims data statistics. True, but do you know how your billing patterns compare to those of other providers? Probably not. One of the most valuable aspects of PEPPER is that it shows how a provider s billing statistics compare to all other providers in the state, jurisdiction, and nation. These comparisons provide context so providers Lundgren can determine if they are at higher risk for improper payments. If so, they can review medical record documentation, billing, and coding processes to ensure they are complying with payment policies. Although PEPPER cannot identify improper Medicare payments, it can be used to help providers identify when McCullough they may be at higher risk for improper Medicare payments. Therefore, they can be proactive in determining whether any issues exist and take any necessary corrective measures. 24 www.hcca-info.org 888-580-8373

for Short-term Acute Care Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals Stroke/intracranial hemorrhage Respiratory infections Simple pneumonia Septicemia Unrelated operating room procedures* CC/MCC for medical DRGs CC/MCC for surgical DRGs Excisional debridement* Ventilator support* Transient ischemic attack* Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Percutaneous cardiovascular procedure with stent insertion* Syncope Other circulatory system diagnoses* Other digestive system disorders* Medical back Spinal fusion* 3-day stays prior to a SNF admission Swing-bed transfers (CAHs only) 30-day readmissions to the same hospital or elsewhere 30-day readmissions to the same hospital 2-day stays for other vascular procedures* 2-day stays for heart failure and shock 2-day stays for cardiac arrhythmia 2-day stays for esophagitis /gastroenteritis 2-day stays for nutritional/metabolic disorders 2-day stays for renal failure* 2-day stays for kidney/urinary tract infections 1-day stays excluding transfers 1-day stays for medical DRGs 1-day stays for chest pain/atherosclerosis *Applicable for Short-term acute care hospitals only CC = Comorbid conditions MCC = Major complications and comorbid conditions DRG = Diagnosis related group Long-term Acute Care Hospital Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Hospice Partial Hospitalization Program Septicemia Comorbidities Miscellaneous CMGs Live discharges Days of service with 4 units billed Excisional debridement Outlier payments CMGs at risk for unnecessary admissions Long length of stay Group therapy Rehabilitation 3 5 day readmissions Outlier payments No individual psychotherapy Short stays Outlier payments 30-day readmissions to same hospital or elsewhere 30-day readmissions STACH admission following IRF discharge CMG = Case mix groups STACH = Short-term acute care hospital IRF = Inpatient rehabilitation facility 60+ days of service 30-day readmissions 888-580-8373 www.hcca-info.org 25

Using PEPPER to support compliance efforts How do providers use PEPPER? According to more than 70 individuals who responded to a PEPPER feedback form available on the PEPPERresources.org website, PEPPER is being used to: guide the auditing process to focus on areas of potential vulnerability (61%), improve the quality of clinical documentation (53%), review their diagnosis and procedure coding process (50%), assess case management procedures (44%), educate staff regarding coding guidelines (43%), educate medical staff (43%), and assess previous efforts to change billing patterns (39%). It s notable that PEPPER is most frequently used to guide auditing and help providers focus on areas of potential vulnerability. Several reports in PEPPER can help with that goal; for example, the Compare worksheet as well as the National High Outlier Ranking Report (available in short-term acute care hospital PEPPERs only). PEPPER also includes data tables and graphs displaying the summarized statistics. These reports can help identify changes over time. To see sample PEPPERs, visit the PEPPERresources.org website and click on the applicable Training and Resources page. For example, a short-term acute care hospital may see this graph (figure 1) in their PEPPER, depicting an increase in the percent of one-day stays for medical diagnosis related groups (DRG) over the past several quarters; the hospital s percent is now above the national and jurisdiction 80 th percentiles, an indication of risk for improper payments. Questions the hospital may wish to explore are: Were there any changes in admission processes? Are there new physicians with admitting privileges? Has the hospital added any new lines of service that may have increased one-day stay admissions? Figure 1: One-day stays for medical DRGs Target Area Percent 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Q3FY 2009 Hospital Q4FY 2009 Q1FY Q2FY Q3FY Q4FY Q1FY Q2FY Q3FY Q4FY Q1FY 2012 Q2FY 2012 Jurisdiction: 80 th Percentile State: 80 th Percentile National: 80 th Percentile The critical access hospital PEPPER graph (figure 2) for simple pneumonia indicates an increase in coding for the higher-weighted simple pneumonia DRGs. Questions to ask could include: Have there been any changes in coding staff? Has the hospital implemented a documentation improvement program? Have there been any changes in the external environment (opening or closing of other health care providers) that may have resulted in a change in the patient population? Figure 2: simple pneumonia data from a critical access hospital Target Percent 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 10/1/08 9/30/09 10/1/09 9/30/10 10/1/10 9/30/11 Hospital National: 80 th Percentile National: 20 th Percentile Jurisdiction: 80 th Percentile Jurisdiction: 20 th Percentile State: 80 th Percentile State: 20 th Percentile 26 www.hcca-info.org 888-580-8373

In another example, the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) PEPPER graph (figure 3) for miscellaneous case mix groups (CMGs) shows the facility s percent of all Medicare discharges for the four miscellaneous CMGs (including diagnoses such as debility, generalized weakness, and other miscellaneous conditions) has increased somewhat over time, although it is still below the national and jurisdiction 80 th percentile. Is it possible that these patients did not require an IRF level of care, or perhaps there was a more definitive diagnosis that should have been assigned? Figure 3: miscellaneous case mix groups for an inpatient rehab facility Target Percent 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 10/1/08 9/30/09 10/1/09 9/30/10 10/1/10 9/30/11 Hospital National: 80 th Percentile Jurisdiction: 80 th Percentile State: 80 th Percentile Putting PEPPER to use It s a good idea to share and review your PEPPER with others within your organization, so they can be involved in interpreting the statistics and planning next steps. Share the PEPPER with health information management/coding, utilization review, case management, quality improvement, compliance, finance, physician leadership, and any others who could assist with these activities. At this point, consider factors that could result in your facility s billing patterns that identify you as being at risk for improper payments, such as the type of services offered, patient case mix/population, and external events in your community, such as the opening or closing of other health care providers. When reviewing your PEPPER, if applicable, consider reviewing target areas that could be related in conjunction with each other. For example, consider simple pneumonia and respiratory infections. If the target area percent of simple pneumonia discharges is low, but the percent of complex pneumonia (respiratory infections) discharges is high, this could be an indication of overcoding. If the opposite is true, it may be possible that the type of pneumonia diagnosed is not being recognized by coders, and physicians are not being queried for further information. Also, review the average length of stay (ALOS) for the numerator and denominator discharges for coding-focused target areas. Theoretically, the numerator discharges would represent higher-severity patients, and the ALOS for the numerator discharges may be expected to be somewhat longer than that for the denominator discharges. Another example would be to look at all one- and/or two-day stays as a group to see if they are increasing over time. Even though your target area percent may be below the 80 th percentile, gradually increasing target area percents could indicate processes should be reviewed. This could give you an early heads-up to practice patterns that should be considered, such as employee education, etc. Use the information you ve gleaned to develop an audit plan, tackling those areas with highest priority first (consider percentile level, number of discharges, and sum of reimbursement for each target area). Think about how you will conduct your reviews. Will they be internal or external, using consultants or outside staff? What time period will you select to review? You may wish to review records from the most recent time periods and move backwards in time if you need to expand the review. 888-580-8373 www.hcca-info.org 27

The next step is to review a sample of medical records. You can determine if you want to conduct a random record review, or if you want to select some records that may be more prone to unnecessary admission or DRG coding errors, perhaps by principal diagnosis code, length of stay, admission source, or some other factor. Submit corrected claims to your Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) or Fiscal Intermediary (FI) for any identified improper payments. Based on the findings from the review, determine if you need to conduct an audit that has a larger scope. If potentially fraudulent issues are identified through the review, you may wish to consider self-disclosing that to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). You would want to discuss this option carefully with legal counsel to determine a course of action. To learn more about the OIG s self-disclosure protocol, visit www.oig.hhs.gov. Work as a team to develop changes to processes, develop and conduct staff education, and put systems in place to prevent future payment errors. Once changes are implemented, remember to conduct another review (a remeasurement review) to determine if the changes were successful or if further interventions are necessary. Periodic monitoring or spot checking is also important to ensure relapses don t occur. You can also review your PEPPER to see if changes in target area statistics can be identified. Who else might be looking at my PEPPER? TMF releases a provider s PEPPER only to that specific provider. PEPPERs are not available for public release. TMF does not provide PEPPERs to other contractors, although TMF does provide an Access database (the First-look Analysis Tool for Hospital Outlier Monitoring, or FATHOM) to MACs, FIs, and Recovery Auditors. FATHOM can be used to produce a PEPPER. It s important to keep in mind that federal contractors have access to much more claims data information about providers than are included in PEPPER, and the contractors have access to sophisticated data mining tools. In addition, law enforcement (such as the Department of Justice) may be able to obtain your PEPPER in an effort to support their internal activities. While this may sound alarming to some providers, the benefit of PEPPER is that the providers will have it first and be able to prepare if regulatory or law enforcement agencies come knocking. Where to learn more? TMF has developed many resources to assist providers with using PEPPER. Visit www.pepperresources.org for recorded training sessions, PEPPER user s guides, sample reports, national-level comparative data, and other resources. TMF encourages users to submit questions about accessing or using their PEPPER through the Help Desk on the website. 888-580-8373 www.hcca-info.org 29