Sample Slide Deck for IDRC Readout



Similar documents
RIGHTNOW MULTI-CHANNEL CONTACT CENTER BENCHMARK REPORT

Also used as a reference and resource for ROI Analyses and Onsite Assessments of performance, including process findings and recommendations.

World Wide Industry Report (Sample) Industry

How-to Guide: Top Ways to Improve Contact Center Performance

Small Businesses Need Contact Centers to Deliver Great Service

Performance Matrix Exhibit 1

A New Look at the Call Center Top Twenty

Contact Center Solutions

CONTACT CENTER SOLUTIONS

Solution Ought to be Delivering

Contact Center Solutions

Schedule Adherence: WHITE PAPER. 7 Not- So- Best Practices and How to Make Them Better. Authored by: Rebecca Wise Girson Wise Workforce Strategies

Contact Center Performance Management Software

Improving Inside Sales Production with Automation

About Talkdesk. 10 KPIs That Affect Customer Satisfaction With Call Center Service 2

customer interaction solutions Contact Centres that Enhance Customer Engagement

Contact Center Solutions

Mitel MiContact Center Enterprise & Business

Upstream Works Overview

Creating Real Value for Your Customers and Your Organization in the Call Center

Call Center Glossary. Call Center Resources

Making WFM Work: Best Practices and ROI Model

Call Center Metrics: Glossary of Terms

The Evolving Role of Process Automation and the Customer Service Experience

Welcome! Thank you for your interest in the 2010 ICMI Global Call Center of the Year Award, and best of luck!

The Right Way to Do Contact Center Reporting

Executive Insight: Multi-Sourcing. By Rudy Vidal, incontact and Matt McConnell, Knowlagent

OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING MEASURE LIST

Everything you need to know about call center service level. talkdesk // 2

Volume Challenges? Technology Can Help A look at the many ways in which technology is a resource for managing peaks and unpredictable volume.

E Source Multichannel Metrics Survey 2012

Business Process Services. White Paper. Managing Customer Experience: Strategies for Success

Contents. Specialty Answering Service. All rights reserved.

2006 Speech Analytics Market Report

Value of Interactive Intelligence. Proposal for Company XYZ. Tool and Model independently developed by: Version: Model v2.24, Report v2.

deeper Transformation in the contact center environment

Enabling Chat -- Key Success Factors in Chat Implementation

IT Service Desk Unit Opportunities for Improving Service and Cost-Effectiveness

QPC MIG benefits and applications - multi-tenanted data, better reporting and added value services for hosted telecoms providers

Contact Center Discovery Exercise

Oracle Business Intelligence Applications Overview. An Oracle White Paper March 2007

Customer Contact Center Benchmarking Results Executive Summary

GUIDE TO PURCHASING A PHONE SYSTEM FOR YOUR CALL CENTER

Central Florida Expressway Authority

Improving Customer Contact Quality

How Innovation Can Change the Contact Center Business. Thais Marca Managing Director, South America Convergys

Workforce Management Software Delivers Rapid ROI for Outbound, Inbound and Blended Centers

The US Contact Center Decision-Makers Guide 2014

State Network Consumer Assistance Small Group Consultation Call Center

empowering hr and engaging employees with affordable, easy-to-use self-service technologies

TOP 10. Strategies for Modernizing Workforce Optimization. ebook

CONTACT CENTER SCHEDULE ADHERENCE

IP CONTACT CENTERS: INTRO TO IPCC TECHNOLOGIES, CONCEPTS, AND TERMINOLOGY

Improve customer experience with your call center

Intelligent Contact Management with. Flexible cloud services from VoltDelta. Contact centre Self service Customer insight

MiContact Center Outbound

Improve Contact Center Performance with Real-Time Metrics

Maintaining a Competitive Edge with Interaction Analysis

How To Measure Call Centre Customer Satisfaction

Unified Customer Experience Management

CRM in the Contact Center and the Emergence of the Unified Agent Desktop

How to make effective Outbound Contact Center. Taweewut Waicharoen April 9,09

The Virtual Contact Center

Transform your Contact Center into a Relationship Platform with PositiveEdge Solutions

INCREASE REVENUES AND CONTROL OPERATING COSTS WITH OUTBOUND DIALING, CAMPAIGNING, AND SCRIPTING

The Patient Contact Center: Finding My Way!

Supporting HR Transformation with PeopleSoft HelpDesk for Human Resources

KnoahSoft Harmony TM Suite. Because Not All Agents are Created Equal

Contact Center Trends and Future

Using a Multichannel Strategy to Deliver an Exceptional Customer Experience

IBM ECM Employee Lifecycle Management August HR best practices: Managing employee information from hire to retire

Next presentation starting soon Next Gen Customer Experience Enabled by PwC & Oracle s Cloud CRM & CX Applications

How Omnichannel is Delivering on the Promise of Multichannel

How To Understand The Value Of A Contact Center

Call Center At-Home Agent Best Practices

Call Center Workforce Management Competency Definition Outlines

Call Center Workforce Management Competency Definitions

A Strategic Approach to Customer Engagement Optimization. A Verint Systems White Paper

OpenScape Contact Center Agile & Enterprise

Evaluation Guide. Call Center Operations and SLA Monitoring Performance Blueprint

[ know me ] A Strategic Approach to Customer Engagement Optimization

Workforce Optimization, Workflow Automation & Workforce Management

The Evolution of Quality Monitoring. How Technology Can Enhance the Effectiveness of Quality Monitoring Programs

Transcription:

Sample Slide Deck for IDRC Readout Report ID: 6122 1

Our Experts SC Photo Bruce Belfiore Senior Research Executive & Chief Executive Officer BenchmarkPortal SC Name Here Certified Auditor Senior Consultant BenchmarkPortal 2

Founder DR. JON ANTON Former Adjunct Professor Purdue University Center for Customer-Driven Quality 3

Our Database Collecting Contact Center data since 1995 Largest Call Center Performance database in the world Thousands of members in our community Forty-Eight Industry Sectors Awarded US Patent # 6877034 BenchmarkPortal maintains the call center database, which is a warehouse of call center best practice statistics on thousands of call centers in 48 industry segments. This performance data is kept current and accurate, and is used by call center professionals worldwide to establish goals for best practice call center performance. 4

www.benchmarkportal.com 5

Quality Index = Effectiveness The SOURCE for Contact Centers Performance Matrix Where do you think you are today? HIGH 2 1 4 3 LOW HIGH Cost Index = Efficiency LOW 6

Performance Matrix The real challenge is balancing caller satisfaction AND cost Intervention Needed 7

High Quality The SOURCE for Contact Centers Performance Matrix The real challenge is balancing caller satisfaction AND cost People Processes Technology working well Low Cost 8

Center of Excellence 9

In-Depth RealityCheck Benchmark Report Principal Investigator Bruce Belfiore Senior Research Executive John Chatterley David Raia Jeff Grossman Director, Research & Analysis Senior Research Analysis Director of IT CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 10

Name: Tony Tiger City: Anywhere Company: State: California E-mail: XYZ@abc.com Country: U.S.A. Phone: 800-999-XXXX Industry Sector: Sample Industry Sector Copyright 2014, BenchmarkPortal,, 126 E. Constance Avenue Santa Barbara, CA 93105 All Rights Reserved. Unless permission is granted, this material may not be copied, reproduced or coded for reproduction by any electrical, mechanical or chemical process or combination thereof, now known or later developed. For any questions or comments, please contact surveys@benchmarkportal.com. 11

Effectiveness Index (Quality) Voice Channel - Performance Working Together Matrix With The challenge of every contact center manager is to balance the quality and quantity of inbound calls handled. The patented BenchmarkPortal processes include the Performance Matrix. The Performance Matrix combines quantity KPIs on the x-axis, i.e., metrics like calls/agent/hour, average talk time, agent utilization and the like (see Section III) with quality KPIs on the y-axis, i.e., metrics like average speed of answer, time on hold and the like (see Section IV) 10.00 5.00 0.00-5.00-10.00-10.00-5.00 0.00 5.00 10.0 Efficiency Index (Quantity/Cost) * Star position is based upon the accuracy of data you provided. Missing metrics will decrease the accuracy of your star position. 12

Goal Our Goal today is to discover how you can improve! INCREASE Effectiveness BRAND Your Center MAXIMIZE Efficiency SAVE Time & Money 13

Annual Budget Estimate Yearly Budget 38 2,858,906 FTE Estimated budget includes all salary, benefits, support staff to the center, technology, phones, desktop apps, training, external resources, facilities, and other costs to run a center like yours. 14

Call Center Classification Metrics Metric Your Value Industry Average Inbound Calls Offered 283,677 748,715 Annual Inbound Call Volume Handled by Agents 275,780 649,463 Annual Inbound Call Volume Handled by the IVR 0 77,250 Percent Business to Business 0.00% 14.20% Percent Consumer to Business 100.00% 85.80% Organized Labor (Union) -Yes N/A 0.00% Organized Labor (Union) -No Y 100.00% Full-Time Agents 38 53 Part-Time Agents 0 10 Metric Your Value Industry Average Respond to Inbound Calls 63.00% 78.55% Initiate Outbound Calls 1.00% 1.35% Respond to E-mail 18.00% 8.93% Respond to On-line Web-chats 14.00% 9.46% Other 4.00% 1.71% To compare a call center s performance to its peers in the same industry, it is useful to have basic statistical information regarding volumes and agent numbers and costs. This slide exhibits these classification metrics. 15

Effectiveness Quality Metrics These make up the Y axis. 16

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 17

Revenue at Risk What could a 1% gap in caller satisfaction cost you in terms of revenue? call volume 283,677 1% Savings 2,837 estimated* value of call $120 Total Savings $340,412 *Note: This example is taken from a cross-industries sampling. Your actual call value must be calculated and used for your individual center. 18

Possible Root Causes Call routing and service level issues First Call Resolution Agent training Knowledge management / CRM SME availability No immediate caller feedback to the agent Ineffective or insufficient agent coaching 19

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 20

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Agent Satisfaction? -4.83% 1. Lower agent satisfaction can result in higher turnover 2. Agent satisfaction has high correlation with caller satisfaction *Can be quantified with Custom Analysis 21

Possible Root Causes Poor agent selection process Deficiencies in training and/or nesting Frustration with lack of Empowerment or tools Pressure resulting from under-staffing Poor relationships with supervisors Punitive call quality monitoring/coaching Perceived inadequate compensation Lack of incentives & appreciation strategies Lack of a clear career track Poor communications & organization 22

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 23

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Calls Closed on First Call? -3.03% Additional calls are transferred in your center annually. Assuming this doubles the length of the call, the estimated* gap cost is approximately -$52,890 *Gap X Annual Agent Handled Call Volume X Estimated Cost Per Call 24

Possible Root Causes Inadequate training of front-line Agents Lack of or inadequate skills-based routing Lack of available SMEs Inadequate FAQ self-service in IVR Dead air time (queue, hold) causing abandons Inadequate knowledge management systems Poor communication of updates from other departments (marketing initiatives, new products, upgrades, etc.) Poor leveraging of social media information 25

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 26

Revenue at Risk What is the cost of a gap in Average Speed of Answer? 7.81 Cost may be expressed in terms of: customer loyalty future sales caller satisfaction metrics Average Speed of Answer directly relates to Abandon Rates 27

Possible Root Causes Sub-optimal WFM technology: either forecasting, schedules and staffing Poor adherence to schedules Break management Restricted access to FAQ information (SME or Knowledge Management tools) Absence of timely monitoring & coaching Desktop application issues: too many/too slow/ navigation problems 28

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 29

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a Gap in Transfers? 4.08% Additional calls are transferred in your center annually. Assuming this doubles the length of the call, the estimated* gap cost is approximately $0 *Gap X Annual Agent Handled Call Volume X Estimated Cost Per Call 30

Possible Root Causes Improper routing and/or distribution of calls (technology, processes) Incomplete agent product knowledge Inadequate access to SMEs for assistance Inadequate knowledge management/ CRM systems Lack of visibility to other department s systems Failure to integrate frequently escalated questions into tier one training updates. 31

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 32

Revenue at Risk What is the annual cost of a gap in Hold Time? -31.60 Additional Costs* may be incurred: Wasted agent time Customer satisfaction metrics Customer loyalty and future sales -$##,#### Must be calibrated by: Percentage of calls put on Hold Impact on First Call Resolution Rate *Can be quantified with Custom Analysis 33

Possible Root Causes Sub-optimal routing or distribution of calls Incomplete or ineffective product knowledge Access to SMEs for assistance Improper use of Hold vs. ACWT Ineffective call recording/monitoring/coaching Desktop navigation issues in Search mode May relate to First Call Resolution metrics 34

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 35

Revenue at Risk What is the annual cost of a gap in Time in Queue? 37.00 Additional Costs* may be incurred: Wasted agent time Customer satisfaction metrics Customer loyalty and future sales Must be calibrated by: Percentage of calls put on Hold Impact on First Call Resolution Rate *Can be quantified with Custom Analysis 36

Possible Root Causes Missing or Inadequate skills-based routing Sub-optimal workforce management Poor adherence to schedule Poor access to SMEs for assistance Lack of monitoring & coaching on call closure Desktop CRM issues: to few / many, slow navigation Insufficient staffing 37

Effectiveness Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s effectiveness (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Top Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 81.30% 74.66% 6.64% Bottom Box Customer Satisfaction in Percent 5.00% 3.45% -1.55% Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 38.90% 43.73% -4.83% Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent 0.00% 1.88% 1.88% Inbound Calls Closed on First Call in Percent 82.30% 85.33% -3.03% Inbound Calls Average Speed of Answer in Seconds 15.00 22.81 7.81 Inbound Calls Transferred in Percent 0.62% 4.70% 4.08% Average Hold Time Inbound Calls in Seconds 108.00 76.40-31.60 Average Time in Queue Inbound Calls in Seconds 18.00 55.00 37.00 Average Inbound Calls Abandoned in Percent 2.79% 3.03% 0.24% 38

Revenue at Risk What is the cost of a gap in Calls Abandoned? 0.24% Does your business have Customer Retention issues? How many of your Abandoned calls don t call back? Did you know you can you estimate* your average revenue or profit per lost customer? *Can be quantified with Custom Analysis 39

Long answer times due to: Possible Root Causes Improper forecasting/scheduling Poor adherence to schedule Poorly managed breaks Lack of call-back option where needed Ineffective Wait time messaging Poorly constructed IVR Confusing/incomplete menu Uninteresting/annoying messages/music Poor audio quality 40

Efficiency Cost Metrics These make up the X axis. 41

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 42

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Calls per Agent per Hour? 0.82 Estimated* for your size Center: $0 *Gap X FTE X burdened Agent cost per call 43

Possible Root Causes Inaccurate forecasting Sub-optimal workforce scheduling Adherence to schedule management Performance Management Monitoring and Coaching Agent Training: Training on call closure Screen navigation Efficient ACWT 44

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 45

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Cost per Call in Dollars? -$1.08 Estimated* for your size Center: -$298,394 *Gap per call X Agent Handled Calls X burdened Agent cost per call 46

Possible Root Causes Poorly implemented or missing self-service option in IVR Lengthy ATT HOLD & ACWT Lack of, or poorly implemented, desktop CRM tools Inadequate product-knowledge training for front-line agents Training on call-management Inadequate access to SMEs High number of transferred/redirected calls High overheads, technology costs, etc. 47

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 48

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Average Talk Time? -0.81 Estimated* for your size Center: -$449,414 *Gap X Total Agent handled calls X burdened Agent Cost per Minute 49

Possible Root Causes Lack of training in call control Inefficient Agent Desktop, CRM or multiple/slow apps Limited access to on-line knowledge tools Need for CTI and screen pops Inadequate call recording and quality monitoring Limited access to SMEs Inadequate incentives for efficiency 50

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 51

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in After Call Work Time? 0.73 Estimated* for your size Center: $0 *Gap X Agent handled calls X burdened Agent Cost per Minute. 52

Possible Root Causes Agent desktop design / slow systems or network / difficult navigation Inability to input information during call Talk and Type Improper use / abuse of ACWT by agents Excessive documentation requirements Lack of effective call monitoring and coaching Training on data capture during the call 53

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 54

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Agent Utilization? 0.86% Estimated* for your size Center: $0 * Must be calculated on an individual center basis 55

Possible Root Causes Lack of focus on Productivity metrics Missing / inadequate WFM system Mismatch of forecasted call volume to agent scheduling resulting in overstaffing Mismanagement of Auxiliary Time (AUX) Poorly scheduled agent breaks/lunches Inconsistent consequence management 56

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 57

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of gap in Occupancy? 12.61% Estimated* for your size Center: $0 *Industry average Gap between actual agent logged-in hours divided by scheduled available hours X your burdened cost per Agent hour 58

Possible Root Causes Inadequate workforce management processes and/or systems Lack of focus on adherence to schedule Mismanagement of Auxiliary Time (AUX) Limited floor management by supervisors Lack of incentives/recognition for high performance (schedule adherence) 59

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 60

Cost of Gap Estimate 2.29% What is the cost of a gap in Adherence to Schedule? Estimated* for your size Center: -$##,#### * Must be calculated on an individual center basis 61

Possible Root Causes Inadequate or missing WFM tool Lack of management s focus on the importance of adherence to schedule Inconsistent expectation/consequence management Lack of agent incentives/recognition to comply to scheduled call handling time Poorly scheduled breaks/lunches Low agent motivation & satisfaction 62

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 63

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Average Agent Attendance? 0.74% Estimated* for your size Center: -$##,#### * Must be calculated on an individual center basis 64

Possible Root Causes Low agent morale Lack of incentives / recognition / rewards for good attendance Inconsistent expectation / consequence management Lack of scheduling to fit agent needs Possible conflicts with other members of team or with management 65

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 66

Cost of Gap Estimate -5.49% What is the cost of a gap in Auxiliary Time in Percent? Estimated* for your size Center: -$53,966 *GAP X Occupancy X Available Hours X Burdened Agent cost per hour 67

Possible Root Causes Improper use of Aux time (breaks, lunches, unauthorized breaks) Possible practice of Aux-Shuffle by agents to move them to the end of the nextavailable agent queue in the ACD. Need for extra Aux-time training and team communication compared with the norm (new centers, centers with high turnover, etc.) 68

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 69

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Agent Supervisor Ratio? -3.00 Estimated* for your size Center: -$##,#### *Variables must be addressed and calculated on an individual center basis 70

Possible Root Causes Lack of Leads to support and assist agents in team Small call center (not necessarily a problem) New center or center with high turnover Too many supervisor duties, requiring smaller teams per supervisor Requires a Reality check in smaller centers 71

Efficiency Key Performance Indicators The table below contains six KPIs indicative of the call center s efficiency (quality). Statistics shown include your value, the industry average as provided by our database and the positive or negative gap for each KPI. Metric Your Value Industry Average Gap Inbound Calls per Agent per Hour 8.02 7.20 0.82 Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars $6.34 $5.26 -$1.08 Average Inbound Call Talk Time in Minutes 5.11 4.30-0.81 Average Inbound After Call Work in Minutes 0.07 0.80 0.73 Agent Utilization in Percent 74.25% 73.39% 0.86% Agent Occupancy in Percent 93.33% 80.72% 12.61% Adherence to Schedule in Percent 96.00% 93.72% 2.29% Average Agent Attendance in Percent 97.00% 96.26% 0.74% Inbound Call Auxiliary Time in Percent 22.51% 17.02% -5.49% Agents/Supervisor Ratio 7.00 10.00-3.00 Turnover of Full-time Agents in Percent 11.00% 26.05% 15.05% 72

Cost of Gap Estimate What is the cost of a gap in Turnover? 15.05% Estimated* for your size Center: $0 *Gap X Total FTE X Cost to bring a new agent on board 73

Possible Root Causes Ineffective applicant screening Ineffective agent training Lack agent Recognition/incentives Frustration with lack of Empowerment or tools Poor relationship with supervisor Untrained/unskilled supervisors Punitive call quality monitoring Inadequate compensation Absence of a clear career track 74

Multi Channel Metrics www.benchmarkportal.com 1-800-214-8929 75

Multi Channel Metrics Multichannel KPI comparisons depicted in this section aggregate multichannel data for All Industries in our growing database until such time as sufficient data has been gathered and validated to allow Industry-specific comparisons. All Industry comparisons with your Industry are useful for directional insights into performance improvement but are not to be considered definitive for a specific Industry. Annual Volume Your Value All Industry Average Outbound Calls Annual Volume 7,669 308,612 E-Mail Annual Total Volume 78,448 64,329 Social Media Annual Volume 300 3,468 Web Chat Annual Volume 61,853 25,174 Postal Mail Annual Volume 3,408 69,716 Fax Annual Volume N/A 10,349 Other Annual Volume 15,100 110,317 www.benchmarkportal.com 1-800-214-8929 76

Multi Channel Metrics Outbound Calls Your Value All Industry Average Gap Outbound Calls Average Talk Time in MINUTES 2.75 3.04 0.29 Outbound Calls After Call Work Time in MINUTES 0.75 1.62 0.87 Outbound Calls Average Cost Per $3.72 $4.92 $1.20 E-mail E-mail Your Value All Industry Average Gap E-mail Response Time in HOURS 19.55 11.44-8.11 E-mail Average Handle Time in MINUTES 8.50 6.88-1.62 E-mail First Contact Resolution Rate Percent 99.00% 80.60% $0.18 E-mail Contact Upsell Rate N/A 7.61% N/A E-mail Average Cost Per $6.55 $8.04 $1.49 Social Media Social Media Your Value All Industry Average Gap Social Media Response Time in HOURS 3 2.38-0.38 Social Media Average Handle Time in MINUTES 4 6.85 2.60 Social Media Cost Per N/A $3.00 N/A www.benchmarkportal.com 1-800-214-8929 77

Multi Channel Metrics Web Chat Your Value All Industry Average Gap Web Chat Response Time in SECONDS 32 84.42 52.42 Web Chat Average Handle Time in MINUTES 8 9.25 1.50 Web Chat First Contact Resolution Rate Percent 98.00% 70.60% 27.40% Web Contact Upsell Rate N/A 5.57% N/A Web Chat Cost Per $6.47 $8.71 -$2.24 Postal Mail Postal Mail Your Value All Industry Average Gap Postal Mail Handle Time in MINUTES 8.00 6.95-1.05 Postal Mail Cost Per $3.72 $10.45 $6.73 Fax Fax Your Value All Industry Average Gap Fax Average Handle Time in MINUTES N/A 1,219.62 N/A Fax Mail Cost Per N/A $7.60 N/A Other Other Your Value All Industry Average Gap Other Average Handle Time in MINUTES 11.00 12.88 1.88 Other Cost Per $5.67 $14.36 $8.69 www.benchmarkportal.com 1-800-214-8929 78

Summary of Findings 79

Cost of Performance Gaps Important notes: These are estimates based on results from the Reality Check Calculator. Amounts may overlap (double-count) benefits and therefore be overstated. Caller Satisfaction may be tied to top line revenues or to profits. Effectiveness Metrics Cost Efficiency Metrics Cost Caller Satisfaction Inbound Calls per Agent / Hour $0 Agent Satisfaction $0 Cost Per Call -$298,394 Calls Closed on First Call -$52,890 After Call Work Time $0 Calls Transferred $0 Turnover of Full - Time - Agents $0 Average Speed of Answer $0 Average Talk Time -$449,414 Average Hold Time Agent Utilization $0 80% Calls Handled Agent Occupancy $0 Average Time in Queue Aux Time -$53,966 Average Calls Abandoned Average Agent Attendance Adherence to Schedule Agent / Supervisor Ratio 80

24 Processes That Impact Your Center Hiring New Agents Training Agents Agent Development Real-Time Expert Hub for Agents Agent Compensation Service Improvement Initiatives Information Access Agent Satisfaction Measurement Call Quality Monitoring Agent Coaching Call Routing Call Center Communications Analytics and Reporting Call Center Performance Evaluation Caller Satisfaction Measurement Caller Service Recovery Agent Workforce Optimization Caller Self Service Performance Benchmarking Caller Relationship Management Teleservices Outsourcing Facilities Management Information Technology Telecommunications 81

Follow up Ideas On-Site Call Center Assessments Standard Assessment includes In-depth Benchmark, Caller Survey, Agent Survey 2-day visit provides detailed findings, conclusions and recommendations Engagements are led by certified auditor and include ongoing follow-up Specialty Assessments available focusing on IVR Optimization, Quality, Technology, Agent Morale, Social Media, etc. Call Center Certification Conducted annually, based on performance Offered on a 1-year to 4-year plan College of Call Center Excellence 3 Day Best Practices Workshop for Managers Other certificated courses: WFM, QA, SM, etc. ibenchmark This automated benchmarking product puts technology and advanced processes to work for people who manage contact centers without the hassle of finding and inputting the metrics manually. 82

An Onsite Assessment Plan 1. Define and validate the 22 key metrics to be benchmarked specific to your industry and operations 2. Increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the call center to achieve best in class performance 3. Assist client to determine the best report analytics that should be used to drive management goals 4. Strengthen the 24 internal processes and create a Road Map of actionable recommendations for change 5. Ultimately to attain status of Certified Center of Excellence 83

Thank You For Your Participation! Welcome to our community of best practices professionals! rm@benchmarkportal.com sc@benchmarkportal.com 84