Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 1 of 5



Similar documents
Broadband Graphics - infringement of Patent Law and Procedure

Case 3:08-cv JM-CAB Document 9 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY DEFENDANT S ANSWER

Case 1:16-cv CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Case No.

Case5:15-cv NC Document1 Filed06/10/15 Page1 of 8

Case 3:14-cv AC Document 10 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 43

Case 2:07-cv LED Document 1-1 Filed 10/09/2007 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT. 1. Plaintiff Tim Blixseth, by and through his undersigned attorneys, for his PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF IDAHO EASTERN DIVISION

JUDGE RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 18 COMPLAINT

Case 2:09-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/21/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

Case: 3:14-cv bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 01/31/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 3:15-cv AC Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 6:12-cv Document 1 Filed 10/22/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

How to Write a Complaint

Case 1:14-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 01/02/14 Page 1 of 6 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

How To Answer A Complaint In A Civil Case

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMENDED COMPLAINT I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. ) IATRIC SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv ) v. ) ) FAIRWARNING, INC.

Case 1:05-cv JGK Document 1 Filed 04/04/05 Page 1 of 6. Plaintiff, : Civ. No. 05cv3493

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 3:15-cv CAR Document 9 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Maricopa County Community College District Board IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Case 1:13-cv CMA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2013 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 1 Filed 04/09/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

MARC D. LAVIK, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. PC 11- : DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, : DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, : STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, : COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv AT Document 1 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:15-cv WYD-MEH Document 1 Filed 12/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/15/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

Case 1:16-cv NYW Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Trademark Infringement Complaint. No. Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys,, I. PARTIES

Case 2:16-cv APG-GWF Document 1 Filed 04/24/16 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:14-cv A Document 1 Filed 04/10/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE NO. Defendant

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/28/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Notice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement

Case 1:10-cv WGY Document 1 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Viacom sues Google over YouTube video clips

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG (CHARLOTTESVILLE) DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v.

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case 8:09-cv MRP-MLG Document 8 Filed 10/27/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case3:15-cv JCS Document1 Filed09/01/15 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case: 14-C V-9538 WI-IF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case5:15-cv HRL Document1 Filed01/28/15 Page1 of 12

Case 6:14-cv AA Document 14 Filed 01/19/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. JURY DEMANDED COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 3:10-cv JAP -DEA Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1

How To Settle A Class Action Lawsuit Against Jimmy Johns

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv Document 1 Filed 08/13/13 Page 1 of 9 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 6:15-cv JRG-KNM Document 1 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

GOODIX TECHNOLOGY INC., SHENZHEN HUIDING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. A/K/A SHENZHEN GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON. March 17, 2007, persons have gathered on the public sidewalk at 9 th and SW Morrison near the

Case 1:11-cv AKH Document 1 Filed 07/01/11 Page 1 of 8 SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv SM Document 16 Filed 12/16/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 05/19/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Transcription:

Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IVI, INC., v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF COPYRIGHT NONINFRINGEMENT FISHER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., CBS BROADASTING, INC., THE CW TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, and WNET.ORG JURY DEMANDED ivi, Inc. (a Washington corporation, which uses a lowercase i for its name and is referred to in this complaint as ivi ) has been accused of copyright infringement by each of the defendants in this action. ivi seeks a declaratory judgment that it has not infringed any copyrights owned by the defendants, and alleges as follows. COMPLAINT- 1

Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 2 of 5 The Parties 1. ivi, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business in Seattle, Washington. 2. Fisher Communications, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 140 Fourth Avenue N., Suite 500, Seattle, Washington 98109. 3. NBC Universal, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York, 10112. 4. CBS Broadcasting, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 51 W. 52 nd Street, New York, New York, 10019. 5. The CW Television Stations, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 524 W. 57 th Street, New York, New York 10019. 6. Disney Enterprises, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 500 S. Buena Vista Street, Burbank, California, 91521. 7. Fox Television Stations, Inc. is a company having a principal place of business at 1211 Avenue of the Americas, 21 st Floor, New York, New York 10036. 8. Major League Baseball is a company having a principal place of business at 245 Park Avenue, New York, New York, 10167. 9. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation is a company having a principal place of business at 10201 West Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, California, 90035. 10. WGBH Educational Foundation is a company having a principal place of business at 125 Western Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02134. 11. WNET.ORG is a company having a principal place of business at 450 W. 33 rd Street, New York, New York 10001. COMPLAINT - 2

Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 3 of 5 Jurisdiction and Venue 12. As an action arising under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 101 et seq., this Court has exclusive jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. 1338. The Court further has jurisdiction over the subject matter as an action arising under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201. 13. Each of the Defendants is the owner of television stations located and operating within this district, or the originator of television content that is intentionally distributed for transmission by one or more television stations located in this district. Each Defendant has substantial, continuous and systematic contacts with this district through the operation of such television stations or the distribution of content intended to be transmitted from within this district and directed toward consumers residing within this district. Each Defendant is therefore subject to personal jurisdiction in the Western District of Washington. ivi TV & the Present Dispute 14. ivi is an entity that receives over-the-air broadcasts of television content that originates with others. Under the Copyright Act, these original over-the-air broadcasts are called primary transmissions. ivi then makes the original content from the primary transmissions available to consumers who download the ivi TV player. The ivi TV player allows consumers to receive the television content over the Internet in much the same way that cable or satellite television consumers are able to play the identical content using a set top box or similar player. Under the Copyright Act, the subsequent distribution of the primary transmission is called a secondary transmission. 15. Each of the Defendants claims to own copyrights in primary transmissions received by ivi and subsequently distributed by ivi as a secondary transmission. 16. The Copyright Act expressly authorizes secondary transmissions of copyrighted works embodied in primary transmissions. For example, the Copyright Act expressly approves of the secondary transmission of an original television broadcast where the secondary transmission COMPLAINT - 3

Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 4 of 5 is subject to a statutory license. Under Section 111 of the Copyright Act, statutory licensing fees are paid periodically to the Register of Copyrights in accordance with an established scale and schedule. Section 111 further provides that the secondary transmission of an over-the-air primary transmission is not an infringement of copyrights in the works contained in the primary transmission. 17. The secondary transmission by ivi of the primary transmission of content originating with the Defendants is permissible under the statutory licensing provisions of the Copyright Act. 18. Because ivi s secondary transmissions of the original primary transmissions are allowed by the Copyright Act, ivi has not infringed any copyrights owned by any of the 19. Despite the clear availability of the statutory license, each of the Defendants has expressly accused ivi of infringing the Copyright Act. ivi has denied that its activities constitute copyright infringement. 20. The accusations of the Defendants creates a case of actual controversy concerning whether ivi s secondary transmission constitutes an infringement under the Copyright Act. 21. Because ivi has not infringed any copyrights owned by any of the Defendants, ivi is entitled to a declaratory judgment of noninfringement of any copyrights owned by any of the COMPLAINT - 4

Case 2:10-cv-01512 Document 1 Filed 09/20/10 Page 5 of 5 REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, ivi seeks judgment as follows: 1. That ivi has not infringed any copyrights owned by any of the defendants; 2. That ivi be awarded its attorneys fees as provided by the Copyright Act or any other applicable authority; 3. That ivi be awarded its costs in this action; and 4. That the Court award such other and further relief as it may deem just and proper. DATED this 20 th day of September, 2010. BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC S/ Lawrence D. Graham Lawrence D. Graham, WSBA No. 25,402 Email: graham@blacklaw.com David A. Lowe, WSBA No. 24,453 Email: lowe@blacklaw.com 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, Washington 98104 T: 206.381.3300 F: 206.381.3301 COMPLAINT - 5