Offshore Pile Testing Campaign Wikinger



Similar documents
PROVA DINAMICA SU PALI IN ALTERNATIVA ALLA PROVA STATICA. Pile Dynamic Load test as alternative to Static Load test

Kentucky Lake Bridge Pile Load Testing Overview Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference Columbus, Ohio 10/28/2015

Dynamic Load Testing of Helical Piles

METHOD STATEMENT HIGH STRIAN DYNAMIC TESTING OF PILE. Prepared by

The advantages and disadvantages of dynamic load testing and statnamic load testing

Offshore Dynamic Pile Load Testing & Pile Driving Monitoring Services

Proceedings of the ASME 28 TH International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE2009 May 31 June 5, 2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Dynamic Pile Analysis Using CAPWAP and Multiple Sensors Camilo Alvarez 1, Brian Zuckerman 2, and John Lemke 3

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

Geotechnical Design Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

STATUS OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN GERMANY

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

Offshore Windfarm Egmond aan Zee 4 years of Operation

MAXIMISING YOUR. Offshore wind assets ASSET OPERATION & MAINTENANCE SERVICES

Design of Offshore Wind Farms Prepared by Flemming Jakobsen & Andrass Ziska Davidsen LICENGINEERING A/S

The installation and servicing

Monobuckets and the competitiveness versus monopiles and jacket structures.

PILE TESTING SPECIFICATION

STATNAMIC : Pile Load Testing Equipment

Databases. by David Cerda Salzmann

Physical Modeling and CFD Simulation of Wave Slamming on Offshore Wind

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Multiple parameters with one Cone Penetration Test. by Mark Woollard

Manual: Nearshore CPT Testing NEARSHORE CONE PENETRATION TESTING (TOP PUSH TECHNIQUE)

Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures

Corrosion in offshore wind energy. a major issue. Harald van der Mijle Meijer

INSTALLATION and LOGISTICS of OFFSHORE WIND FARMS

Introduction BAM and Van Oord GBF - Concrete Centre Conference, December 2012

The Netherlands Licensing procedure offshore windfarms. Sander de Jong Rijkswaterstaat Noordzee

User orientated simulation strategy to analyse large drive trains in SIMPACK

Overturning Stability of Offshore Wind Power Substructure with Bucket Foundation

Precision Miniature Load Cell. Models 8431, 8432 with Overload Protection

Offshore Wind in Germany

Profile. Offshore Wind Projects. Sustainable EPC and Marine Contractors

Environmental aspects of offshore wind energy. Jakob Asjes Jakob Asjes IMARES, Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies

INNWIND.EU Offshore wind energy DTU Contributions to WP4.2 Technology, ecomony, trends and research. Henrik Bredmose Thomas Buhl

Haliade 150-6MW Experiencia funcional con la nueva generación offshore

London Array Off-Shore Wind Farm

Title: IEC WT 01 vs. IEC Development of a new standard and innovations in certification of Wind Turbines. mike.woebbeking@gl-group.

Offshore Work Packages

Soft, diagnostic and proof load testing in routine bridge assessment. Joan R. Casas Technical University of Catalunya (UPC) Barcelona, Spain

Conquering New Frontiers in Underwater Cone Penetration Testing

SITE SPECIFIC WIND TURBINE FOUNDATION CERTIFICATION

PROCESS MONITORING FOR DEEP ROLLING IN THE SERIAL PRODUCTION

Driven Concrete Pile Foundation Monitoring With Embedded Data Collector System

Subminiature Load Cell Model 8417

Windfarm Installation Barge. a novel approach to installing foundations in offshore wind

RECENT EXPERIENCES WITH BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING

De Industrie. KIvI Niria Jaarcongres De uitdagingen voor windenergie op zee. Ballast Nedam Offshore. Dolf Elsevier van Griethuysen

FRANKIPILE. High Pile Loads Optimum Adaptation to Foundation Soil Low-noise Manufacturing Process

Tidal Correction Using GPS Determination of the Chart Datum. October 9, FIG Congress 2006

GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

Important Points: Timing: Timing Evaluation Methodology Example Immediate First announcement of building damage

V MW & V MW (OFFSHORE)

Comparison Between Dynamic and Static Pile Load Testing

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Offshore wind farm electrical engineering (when considering the operation of array cabling at voltages of 66kV)

Method Statement for Static Load Testing (Compression) for Micropiles

2015 CT Offshore A/S Diving Assistance Sub Station Debris Clearance WODS Wind Farm

DYNAMIC TESTING OF MICROPILES. COMPARISON OF STATIC AND DYNAMIC TEST RESULTS

Nautischer Verein zu Bremerhaven Bremerhaven, Nautischer Verein

User manual data files meteorological mast NoordzeeWind

Civil Engineering and Marine Works (CEM) Offshore Branch Office

Field tests using an instrumented model pipe pile in sand

Practice of rapid load testing in Japan

HV Submarine Cable Systems Design, Testing and Installation

Offshore Structures. Offshore Drilling Equipment

Weight Measurement Technology

Steel construction. Solutions for the renewable energy and offshore sectors. published by energyengineering magazine

HLV - Pile. High level displacement pile. Consulting Design Execution

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

WV Energie AG Offshore Wind Power. July 13

RENEWABLE ENERGY IN FIFE Skills and Supply Chain

Modern insurance solutions protect innovative technologies RENEWABLE ENERGY

Underwater Noise and Licensing of Offshore Windfarms in the Netherlands. Sander de Jong Rijkswaterstaat Noordzee

Service and Maintenance. SEW-EURODRIVE Driving the world

Pro-Lift Steel Pile Foundation Repair

Helicopter Flight Operations to Offshore Windfarms

Platform Technologies for Offshore Renewable Energy Conversion Diego Vannucci, RINA

ANALYSIS OF A LAP JOINT FRICTION CONNECTION USING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS

The Delft Offshore Wind Turbine Concept (DOT)

The Market for Installation Vessels

EXPERIENCE WITH DP-SYSTEMS ON BOARD

Federation of Piling Specialists Testing Datasheet No 1

Fugro monitoring services. If you can t measure it, you can t improve it : Lord Kelvin ( )

Figure CPT Equipment

Renewable Energy Promotion Policies in Taiwan. Bureau of Energy Ministry of Economic Affairs

Dually Fed Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Condition Monitoring Using Stator Current

ADVANCEMENTS IN STATNAMIC DATA REGRESSION TECHNIQUES

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

Contents. 1. PROFILE p2. 2. SERVICES 2.1 Offshore Support Services p 4 Offshore support p 6 ROV operations p 8

Experiences with Hydro-Sound Measurements during Pile Driving - Past, Today and Future-

Design Basis for Offshore Wind Turbines for shallow and deep water

Offshore Wind: some of the Engineering Challenges Ahead

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Transcription:

Offshore Pile Testing Campaign Wikinger Pile driving analysis, static and dynamic load tests in 40m water depth Jan Fischer, Fichtner Water & Wind GmbH, Hamburg, Germany Rob van Dorp, Allnamics BV, Den Haag, The Netherlands

Wikinger OWF Developer Iberdrola Renewables Deutschland GmbH The Windfarm Turbine: 70 Adwen AD 5-135 (5 MW, Rotor-, 135 m) Project Capacity: 350MW Foundation: Jackets Water depth: 36 m to 42 m Pile testing campaign Execution: Bilfinger Marine & Offshore Systems GmbH Date: 2014/2015 Installation Company: Boskalis and Volker Stevin Start: spring 2016 Slide 2

Location Slide 3

Pile testing campaign General Only very little information exists about the skin friction and toe resistance behavior of typical Baltic Sea soils as glacial till and chalk. Why Gain soil data information for driveability studies and for bearing capacity calculations How Extensive offshore pile testing campaign including pile driving analysis (PDA), dynamic load tests (DLT) and pull out static load tests (SLT-T) Source: ECSMGE 2015, Barbosa et al. Special Task: Testing underwater, in depths of approx. 40 m Slide 4

Fichtner / Allnamics Drivability predictions / hammer selection Producing the deep sea operation sensors, cables etc. (for PDA and DLT) Development of method statements for the different investigation phases Pile driving analysis / dynamic load tests (at altogether six piles) Signal matching (using AllWave-DLT) Back calculation (simulation) of the pile driving using the results from the pile driving protocols and the dynamic load tests Execution of the static tension pull out test (SLT-T) in terms of correct application of the different load steps Interpretation of the static tension pull out test Restrike dynamic load tests including signal matching Interpretation of the soil setup on the basis of the results from the different phases etc. Slide 5

Phase I Installation of nine piles at three different locations, including pile driving analysis (PDA) and dynamic load testing (DLT) Test piles: Location Water depth [m MSL] Diameter [m] Pile length [m] Penetration depth at the end of driving [m BSF] WK-a 40.0 1.37 21.8 16.8 WK-b 38.2 1.37 35.7 30.7 WK-c 36.6 1.37 36.0 31.0 MV Lone: DP2 Vessel by SAL Slide 6

Phase I - Equipment Triplex Template (Pile guiding frame) Pile Hammer (MENCK MHU 800S) Slide 7

Phase I - Video Slide 8

Instrumentation and testing Two equipped test piles per location (for SLT and DLT) Two separate sets per pile Each set consisting of two strain transducers and two acceleration transducers Each 'pair' (strain and acceleration) placed diametrically opposed on the pile shaft Special deep sea sensors and cables Data recorder (PDR) Instrumentation Slide 9

Phase II - Equipment Phase II: Execution of one static tension pull out test (SLT-T) and one dynamic re-strike test (DLT) per test location. More than ten weeks after pile installation as part of Phase I Reference frame (SLT-T) Displacement measurement Loading beam (SLT-T) Force application Hammer (DLT) Slide 10

Phase II - Video Slide 11

Phase II SLT-T Loading Beam and Reference Frame Locking Tool Slide 12 page 12

Phase II SLT-T Slide 13 page 13

normalized displacement [-] normalized force [-] normalized force [-] Phase II Results 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Statische Probebelastung Load-Displacement 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 normalized Force [-] Static tension pull out test (SLT-T) 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 DLT restrike Allnamics strain gauges (mean value) Strain Load cells transducer (cumulative 1 value) Strain transducer 2 Acceleration trancducer 1 (v*z) Accerleration trancducer 2 (v*z) -0.2 0.0-0.40.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 normalized time [-] time [ms] Restrike dynamic load test Slide 14

Summary The entire offshore testing campaign can be considered a huge success, especially since tests of this nature had not been performed before During the execution of the work in Phase I and Phase II, all tests could be carried out with high accuracy and high quality data The obtained test results led to a detailed understanding of the skin friction and toe resistance values for large diameter offshore pipe piles in typical Baltic Sea soils, i.e. glacial till and chalk What is next On the basis of the obtained test results, the installation of the wind turbine piles was predicted by us The results were used e.g. for pile driving fatigue calculations, as an important value for the pile design Slide 15

Thank you for your attention FICHTNER WATER & WIND Fichtner Water & Wind GmbH Hammerbrookstrasse 47b D-20097 Hamburg Tel. +49 40 300673 0 jan.fischer@fww.fichtner.de www.fww.fichtner.de FICHTNER WATER & WIND Allnamics BV Waterpas 98 NL-2495 Den Haag Tel. +31 (0)882556264 vandorp@allnamics.eu www.allnamics.eu