Environmental Radiation Risk Assessment



Similar documents
Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris on December 15, 1852

Chapter 15 Radiation in the Environment 1

Lung Cancer and Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Sophie ANCELET, IRSN/PRP-HOM/SRBE/LEPID

RADON AND HEALTH. INFORMATION SHEET October What is radon and where does it come from?

Figure 1-1. Uranium Decay Series

What is Radon? Radon is a gas produced by the radioactive decay of the element radium.

How To Understand The Effects Of Radiation On A Cell

Are children more sensitive to radiation than adults?

INSTRUCTION CONCERNING RISKS FROM OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE

A radiation weighting factor is an estimate of the effectiveness per unit dose of the given radiation relative a to low-let standard.

The decay of progeny continues until stable, non-radioactive progeny are formed. At each step in the decay process, radiation is released.

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

EPA Radionuclides Rule and the RadNet Program

Nuclear Energy in Everyday Life

Chemistry 1000 Lecture 2: Nuclear reactions and radiation. Marc R. Roussel

Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Safety. Module 1. Radiation Safety Fundamentals

Strahlenschutzbelehrung Allgemeiner Teil. Radiation Protection

X-ray Radiation Safety Course. James Kane & Rob Deters Office of Radiological Control

Radon: The Second Leading Cause of Lung Cancer? Deh, deh, deh, dehhhhh..

U.S. EPA s Models for Establishing Cleanup Levels in Soil, Water, Buildings and Streets at Superfund Sites

Treating Thyroid Cancer using I-131 Maximum Tolerable Dose Method

Leukemia and Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources

medical diagnostics caesium-137 naturally occurring radio nuclides in the food radon in indoor air potassium in the body

Radiation and Pregnancy

Experiment 10. Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado

The effects of radiation on the body can be divided into Stochastic (random) effects and deterministic or Non-stochastic effects.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Radiology Tech

Industrial tracers - Finding leaks and blockages

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

Introduction. Chapter 15 Radiation Protection. Regulatory bodies. Dose Equivalent. Regulatory bodies. Main Principles of Radiation Protection

SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BIOSPHERE MODEL TO ESTIMATE RADIOLOGICAL DOSE IN THE GOLDSIM ENVIRONMENT

Radium-223 Therapy: Handling & Radiation Safety Issues

SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

DOSES TO EYES AND EXTREMITIES OF MEDICAL STAFF DURING INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES

Medical Physics and Radioactivity

The Field. Radiologic technologists take x-rays and administer nonradioactive materials into patients' bloodstreams for diagnostic purposes.

Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials

Chapter 13. Radiation and health Cancer. Is radiation dangerous?

Society of Nuclear Medicine 1850 Samuel Morse Drive Reston, VA

Radiation Protection Series

Comparison of Medical and DOE Health Physics Programs. Kevin Lee Radiation Safety Officer Palmetto Health

Radiological Worker Training

Smoking and Lung Cancer

Chapter 17: Radioactivity and Nuclear Chemistry

short mean lives), emitting alpha particles, which have a high LET. Thus radon causes

Dissolved Mineral Radioactivity in Drinking Water

Dealing With RADON in Real Estate Transactions

Radiation and Environmental Protection at the CNSC

Comparison of natural radioactivity removal methods for drinking water supplies: A review

SOP #: Revision #: Current Version Implementation Date: Page #: Page 1 of 10 Last Reviewed/Update Date: Expiration

Nuclear medicine. Answering your questions

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/51/EURATOM

What Parents Should Know about the Safety of Dental Radiology.

Table 1. Uranium-238 Decay Chain

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Medical Applications of radiation physics. Riccardo Faccini Universita di Roma La Sapienza

Distribution of Terminal Lung and Liver Dose Rates in United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries Registrants

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Public Affairs Washington, DC Phone Fax

What if... A nuclear waste accident scenario in Los Angeles, CA. Richard Wiles James R. Cox. June 27,

Dose conversion factors for radon

Radiation Safety Issues for Radiologic Technologists

Postgraduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection and the Safety of Radiation Sources Standard Syllabus

1. PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

PRINIPLES OF RADIATION THERAPY Adarsh Kumar. The basis of radiation therapy revolve around the principle that ionizing radiations kill cells

X-Rays Benefits and Risks. Techniques that use x-rays

1. What are the chemical and radiologic characteristics of radon?

University of Colorado Radiology Dose-Risk Smartcard

4. CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL, AND RADIOLOGICAL INFORMATION

OCCUPATIONAL LUNG CANCER

RADON Although radon is agas, its decay products are not, and they occur either as unattached

Dealing With RADON in Real Estate Transactions

Transcription:

Environmental Radiation Risk Assessment Jerome Puskin, PhD Center for Science & Risk Assessment Radiation Protection Division Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA)

2

Outline 1. Ionizing radiation definitions, exposure 2. Scientific basis for radiogenic cancer induction 3. Estimating radiogenic cancers risks 4. Examples of EPA s use of radiation risk estimates 3

Definitions Ionizing radiation: Radiation with sufficient energy to remove electrons from atoms in a medium through which it passes LET (Linear Energy Transfer): energy lost per unit path length for a charged particle Radionuclide: Atom with an unstable nucleus that decays with a characteristic half-life, producing radioactive emissions of particular types and energies 4

Types of Radioactive Emissions Alpha-particles: 4 He nuclei, high-let, very shortrange Beta-particles: electrons, low-let, short-range Gamma-rays: photons, low-let, penetrating 5

Radiation Exposure 6

Radiation Dose Absorbed dose (D) = energy deposited per unit mass [SI unit, Gy ; 1 Gy =100 rad] Dose equivalent: H= w R x D Units: rem, Sv For photons & electrons, w R =1 For α-particles, w R =20 Effective dose = w T H T 7

Average Radiation Dose from Different Sources of Exposures Exposure Category Average Annual Effective Dose (mrem) Radon and thoron 228 Other ubiquitous background (cosmic rays, terrestrial radiation, ingested radionuclides) Medical (CT, conventional radiography, nuclear medicine, interventional fluoroscopy) Consumer (tobacco, building materials, air travel) Other (occupational, industrial, security, nuclear power) 83 300 13 3 Total 627 8

Scientific basis for radiogenic cancer induction 9

Mechanistic Basis Radiation DNA damage Mutation in a (single) somatic cell Cancer Recent data have called this picture into question (non-targeted effects) 10

Single tracks of low - LET or high- LET radiation can produce Complex Clustered Damage in DNA Two examples of Complex Clustered Damage in DNA Parts of: Electron track Alpha-particle track [ Goodhead, IJRB 65, 7 (1994) ] DTG 21.8.03 11

Laboratory Studies Radiation has been found to induce In cells: mutations, chromosome damage, cell transformation, cell killing In animals: cancer in irradiated tissues 12

Dose Response 13

High-LET Effects Generally, same end-points as low-let High-LET more effective: Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) usually taken to be 20 for low doses of α-particles No reduction in effectiveness at low doses and dose rates 14

Epidemiological Studies 15

Lifespan Study (LSS) of Japanese A-Bomb Survivors Large population (120,000 survivors) Both genders, all ages ATB All organs irradiated Wide range of doses (instantaneous, mostly γ-rays) Good dose estimates Long, detailed medical follow-up 16

A-Bomb Dosimetry Dose estimate for each survivor by organ Based on location at the time of bombing Takes into account shielding by buildings and by the body 17

Leukemia in Bomb Survivors First cancers to be observed Short latency Highly radiogenic, low background rate Most of the risk disappears after 15-25 years 18

Leukemia in A-Bomb Survivors 19

Solid Cancer Risks in A-Bomb Survivors 20

Solid Cancers: Variation in Risk with Age 21

Summary of Results on Solid Cancers in the Japanese A-Bomb Survivors 1. Risk nearly proportional to dose with no apparent threshold 2. Significant risk at doses > 10-20 rad 3. Excess cancers seen for numerous sites 4. Risks decrease with age at exposure 5. Risks increase with attained age 22

Information from Other Epidemiological Studies Ancillary information on: Fractionated and chronic exposures α-particles Specific organ risks Western populations 23

Cohorts Exposed Medically 1. Fluoroscopy for TB (fractionated x-ray doses) breast cancer* 2. Treatment for chronic mastitis breast cancer* 3. Thymus irradiation, tinea capitis thyroid cancer* 4. Ankylosing spondylitis leukemia et al. 5. Peptic ulcers stomach cancer 6. 224 Ra injections for bone disease (α) bone cancer* 7. Thorotrast patients (α) leukemia*, bone*, liver* 8. Prenatal x-rays childhood cancer* 24

Occupational Cohorts Chronic or episodic exposures 1. Nuclear workers (N. American & European) leukemia 2. Radium dial painters bone 3. Radiologists and radiological technicians leukemia, breast 4. Underground miners (radon) lung* 5. Mayak workers (α,γ) lung*, liver*, bone, leukemia 6. Chernobyl clean-up workers leukemia 25

Environmentally Exposed Cohorts Chronic exposures, require dose reconstruction 1. Marshall Islanders thyroid effects from radioiodines 2. Techa River cohort leukemia, solid cancers ; data > risks per unit dose similar to LSS 3. Chernobyl population childhood thyroid cancer 4. Taiwanese residents of apartments built with 60 Co-contaminated steel leukemia, breast 26

Human Evidence for Radiation-Induced Cancers at Low Doses Excess cancers in A-bomb survivors demonstrated at (acute) doses of 10-20 rad Evidence for cancer risk at 1-3 rad seen in studies of: Children exposed to prenatal x-rays Patients exposed to highly fractionated diagnostic doses of x-rays Occupationally and environmentally exposed cohorts indicate that chronic radiation is also carcinogenic 27

Estimating Radiogenic Cancer Risk in the U.S. Population 28

Calculation of Cancer Risk Estimates for U.S. Population 1. Mathematical models for each cancer site based on best fit to human epidemiology a. Incorporate dependence on age, time, and gender. b. Assume 5-yr minimum latency for solid cancers 2. For extrapolation to low doses and dose rates, assume LNT with DDREF 1.5 for low-let 3. Average two different approaches for extrapolating risk from A-bomb survivors to U.S. population 4. Life table corrections for competing risks 29

EPA Revised Blue Book 1. EPA Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the U.S. Population 2. Based on National Academy of Sciences report (BEIR VII) 3. Available on EPA web-site: www.epa.gov/radiation/assessment/bluebook/index.html 4. Cancer (average) incidence risk 1x10-3 per rad for uniform, whole-body, low-let radiation a. ~ 10-3 per rem (unit of effective dose) b. Higher for childhood exposures 30

Cancer Risk Coefficients for Radionuclides 1) Radionuclide-specific cancer risk coefficients (risk per unit intake for ingestion or inhalation) 2) Risk int = (intake) x (risk/unit intake) 3) To calculate risk coefficients for internal exposure: 31

Federal Guidance Report No.13 (EPA 1999) Provides risk coefficients for 800 radionuclides for ingestion, inhalation, and external exposures Age- and gender-dependent intakes, doses, and risk models Available electronically at http://www.epa.gov/radiation 32

Radiation vs. Chemical Cancer Risk Assessments External exposure pathways for radiation Risk models more detailed dependent on cancer site, age at exposure, attained age Rrisk estimates more reliable Based on extensive human data More theoretical and empirical support for LNT However, low dose extrapolation still a major controversy 33

Sources of Uncertainties in Cancer Risk Coefficients 1) Biokinetic and dosimetric models (radionuclide-specific) 2) Dosimetric uncertainties in epidemiology studies 3) Sampling errors in epidemiological data 4) Age and temporal response 5) Extrapolating risks across populations 6) Response at low doses and dose rates (DDREF) 8) RBE of α-particles? 34

Examples of EPA s use of radiation risk estimates 35

Radionuclides in Drinking Water I. Beta/Photon Emitters Regulation set in 1976; updated in 2000 MCL: maximum 4 mrem/y to any organ, assuming 2L/d intake Whole-body dose of 4 mrem/y for 70 y ~3x10-4 lifetime cancer risk 36

Radionuclides in Drinking Water II. Alpha Emitters Biggest concern usually radium ( 226 Ra, 228 Ra) Ra is a Ca analog Incorporates into bone, irradiating bone and bone marrow for many years However, most of the estimated risk is from irradiation of soft tissues MCL of 5 pci/l estimated lifetime risk of 5x10-5 ( 226 Ra), 2x10-4 ( 228 Ra) 37

Radon in Homes Radon ( 222 Rn): inert gas from decay of 226 Ra Primary source of indoor Rn is soil gas Main risk: lung cancer caused by inhaled radon decay products, which deposit in the lung and irradiate airways with α-particles The average level in homes is 1.25 pci/l About 6% of all homes exceed the EPA action level of 4 pci/l 38

Radon Risk Risk estimates derived from an analysis of 11 miner cohort studies (NAS: BEIR VI) Strong synergism with smoking Estimates supported by case-control studies of lung cancer correlated with radon levels in homes Estimated average risk from lifetime exposure at 4 pci/l is 2%, but depends on smoking 20,000 projected radon-related lung cancers annually in the U.S. 39

Contact information: puskin.jerome@epa.gov (202)-343-9212 40