The economic impact of Winona State University



Similar documents
The economic impact of Alexandria Technical and Community College

The economic impact of Dakota County Technical College

The economic impact of Saint Paul College

The economic impact of Minnesota State University, Mankato

The economic impact of Minnesota State Community and Technical College

The economic impact of Inver Hills Community College

The economic impact of Normandale Community College

The economic impact of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

The Economic and Societal Impact of The University of Minnesota

Background on the Economic Impact Methodology Used in the Analysis

The Economic Impact of Giants Ridge on St. Louis County

The Negative Employment Impacts of the Medicare Cuts in the Budget Control Act of September 2012

Economic Consequences of Building the Black Hills Energy Power Plant in Pueblo County with a Project Labor Agreement

WM RECYCLE AMERICA, L.L.C.

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas Final Report Prepared by: John D. Wong, J.D., Ph.D.

ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax Reductions in North Carolina

The Economic Impact of AAMC-Member Medical Schools and Teaching Hospitals

North Bay Industry Sector Rankings (By County) October 2015 Jim Cassio

IMPACT OF THE HOMECARE AND HOSPICE INDUSTRY ON PENNSYLVANIA S ECONOMY

Rochester, Minnesota. Summary. Housing Market Area. Market Details. Rental Market. Economy. Sales Market

Serving the Community Well:

The Economic Value of the Frederick County, Maryland, Public School System: Dollars & Cents and Beyond

planning market analysis & site location services Economic Impact Analysis:

R H W. October 2013 Research Study

A Lee County Economic Impact Study Prepared for

UMD Labovitz School of Business and Economics. Bureau of Business and Economic Research

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of Dallas County, Iowa a. Daniel Otto and Georgeanne Artz b

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas

The Economic Impact Of Minnesota s State Colleges And Universities. An Update

The Economic Impact of Destin Tourism on Okaloosa County

Economic Contribution of Telecommunication Companies Serving Greater Minnesota

Casino Industry - Factors, Effects and Taxes

SE Minnesota Beacon Enabling Population Health Research

Afghanistan Statistical Yearbook

The Economic Impact of Texas State University

The Economic Impact of Golf In South Carolina

HOSPITAL INDUSTRY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

DEMONSTRATING ECONOMIC

Prepared for: The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Prepared by: Ziona Austrian, Ph.D. Candice Clouse, M.S. Iryna Lendel, Ph.D.

Economic Impacts of Extending Health Care Coverage in Florida

Economic Impact Analysis of School Facility Construction

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WASHINGTON HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES AUTHORITY

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

The Economic Impact of the New Hospital on the Economy of Drumright, Creek County, Oklahoma

THE INVISIBLE ENGINE:

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Catskills Focus

The Economic Impact of Health Services on the Economy of Sumter County, Alabama

THE PROJECTED ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A TENNESSEE HISTORIC REHABILITATION INVESTMENT INCENTIVE

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Central New York Focus

HOUSTON COUNTY 304 South Marshall Street Caledonia, Minnesota 55921

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Economy of Cherokee County

Innovation in Washington State

Fastest Growing Occupations,

Economic Impact Report 2014

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NOVANT HEALTH IN NORTH CAROLINA

VERMONT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES, BENEFITS, CONTRIBUTIONS AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY CALENDAR YEAR 2014

Tucson International Airport Economic Impact Study 2012

DRAFT. All NAICS. 3-Digit NAICS BP C 3 P 76 X 0 BP C 0 P 0 X 2 OC C 29 P 44 X 35 OC C 0 P 0 X 2 MH C 96 MH C 8 P 37 X 62 P 1107 X 587

THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTIONS OF OREGON S PHYSICIAN PRACTICES

21 - MINING % 221 Utilities % 6, CONSTRUCTION

THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF MEDICAID EXPANSION ON MISSOURI

The Economic Impacts of Angelo State University

Economic Impact of the Queen of Peace Hospital and Related Health Sectors of Scott County

Regional Competitive Industry Analysis

NOV The ECONOMIC VALUE of IDAHO PUBLIC COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

The Economic Impact of Hospital Systems in New Hampshire July 2015

IHS Study on the Economic Impact of Proposed Restrictions on Tax Exempt Bonds for Nonprofit Organizations

RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE COMMUNICATIONS PLAN

SVH and SVH-related spending in Sonoma County generates $103 million in spending annually and 658 jobs.

Inteligencia-Economica-exportaciones-por-naics

Section 3 and Women or Minority Owned Business (MBE/WBE) Compliance. Revised 4/4/13

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

The local economic impact of Inver Hills Community College

Access one of the most comprehensive Lists of Minnesota Legal Professionals

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

Travel & Tourism Sector Ranking Australia

Prepared for Prepared by

Residential Nexus Analysis City and County of San Francisco. Prepared for: City and County of San Francisco

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland

Economic Impact of Florida Power & Light Company s Nuclear Power Plants

Economic and Fiscal Impacts Generated by Apple in Cupertino Current Facilities and Apple Campus 2. Prepared for: Apple Inc.

Dallas Cowboys Training Camp

Impacts of Government Jobs in Lake County Oregon

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

Minnesota Nonprofit Job Seeker Guide

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of St. James Parish, Louisiana. Other Services

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Economic Impacts of the National College of Natural Medicine in Portland, Oregon

Current Employment Statistics Highlights

billion paid to private sector workers during Focus on Meeting and Convention Segment. The convention and

NCICU EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DEMONSTRATING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF NORTH CAROLINA S INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES FEBRUARY 2015

THE 2006 LOUISIANA TOURISM SATELLITE ACCOUNT AN UPDATE

The Economic Impact of the Keystone XL Pipeline on the State of Nebraska

Economic Impact of Aviation and the Aerospace Industry in Oklahoma. Final Report. for the

Small Business Opportunities and Job Creation in Healthcare

Military Spending and Jobs in Massachusetts

Expanding Medical Education in Georgia

Local Sales and Use Taxes

Transcription:

The economic impact of Winona State University F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 3

The economic impact of February 2013 Prepared by: Jose Y. Diaz and Gabriel Pina Wilder Research 451 Lexington Parkway North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104 651-280-2700

Contents Executive summary... 1 Introduction... 2 impact on the South East region... 4 Regional profile... 4 Economic impact of on the South East region... 4 Impact on jobs... 5 Impact on taxes... 7 Benefits beyond operations: enhanced productivity... 7 Figures 1. South East regional profile 2011... 4 2. Economic impact of in the South East region in 2011 ($ millions)... 5 3. Top ten industries impacted by in the South East region in 2011 ($ millions)... 5 4. Impact on employment of in the South East region in 2011 (jobs)... 6 5. Impact on employment of in the South East region by source (jobs)... 6 6. Top ten industries impacted by employment in 2011 (jobs)... 6 The economic impact of Wilder Research, February 2013

Executive summary generates an annual economic impact of $307 million from its operations in the South East region. Based on the South East region economy of $22.6 billion, this means that for every $100 produced in the region, $1 are directly or indirectly related to. The direct impact of the university in 2011 was $210 million, while the indirect impact in other industries was $97 million. Similarly, during 2011 the university and its students generated an estimated 3,875 jobs in the South East region. These jobs included an estimated 3,040 direct jobs, and 835 additional indirect jobs, created by vendors, contractors, and businesses supplying inputs to the university and its students. Additionally, by educating its students, enhances the productivity of both public and private organizations in Minnesota. Only considering the 1,669 degrees awarded by in 2011, this is equivalent to $301.2 million of future value created in the state. The economic impact of 1 Wilder Research, February 2013

Introduction is located in Winona, Minnesota, part of the South East development region. Three campuses make up Winona State: the Original and West Campuses in Winona, and the WSU-Rochester campus in Rochester, Minnesota. Winona State University offers 65 undergraduate programs, 12 graduate programs of study, and one doctoral program in nursing practice. has more than 8,800 students registered each year, coming from every part of the state, the country, and more than 47 nations. In 2011 the university awarded 24 associate degrees, 1,514 bachelor s degrees, 137 master s and post-master s degrees, and 1 doctorate degree. During the same year, had operational expenses of $126 million. is one of the 31 institutions in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (MnSCU) system; the largest single provider of higher education in the state of Minnesota. The colleges and universities operate 54 campuses in 47 Minnesota communities, serving 430,000 students in credit and non-credit courses, with about 34,700 graduates each year. This report estimates the economic impact of on the South East region. Through its daily activities, the university generates economic value for the region in several ways. First, spending by the university and its students directly impacts the personal income, employment, and tax revenues of the state. Secondly, these expenditures generate an indirect effect; all activities induce other organizations and businesses to spend more, creating what is known as a multiplier effect. Finally, by educating its students, the university enhances the productivity of both public and private organizations in Minnesota. The economic impact of 2 Wilder Research, February 2013

Data used in the analysis include: operational expenditures, salaries and benefits from its 2011 financial statements Capital expenditures from the state s bond projects that financed investments for during 2010 to 2012 from the Minnesota Management & Budget office 1 Estimates of students spending. A survey of 220 students and their spending patterns was used in the IMPLAN model to estimate the direct and indirect effect of this spending for a given year 2 1 2 Minnesota Management and Budget (2012). Bond s Proceeds Report. Retrieve at http://www.mmb.state.mn.us/doc/bonds/proceeds/mnscu-bonds-fund-4020-fy10.pdf The method used in the calculations of these impacts is the Input-Output model developed by IMPLAN. This method measures the direct impact of an organization s spending in a particular region (a country, state or county) by estimating the inputs used by the organization and the multiplier effects in other industries in the region. For purposes of this study, the University s expenditures and its indirect effects come from its operational activities, its capital investments, and its students spending. The economic impact of 3 Wilder Research, February 2013

impact on the South East region Regional profile During 2011, the South East region had around 496 thousand residents (close to 10 percent of the state s population), with 300 thousand employees and a gross regional product of $22.6 billion (8.5 percent of the state s total regional product). The main industries in the region, by employment levels, were offices of physicians, dentists, and other health practitioners, food services and drinking places, education, and private hospitals. 1. South East regional profile 2011 Population 496,463 Total employment 309,520 Gross regional product $22.6 billion Average household income $99,451 Per capita gross regional product $45,590 Counties in the region: Dodge County, Fillmore County, Freeborn County, Goodhue County, Houston County, Mower County, Olmsted County, Rice County, Steele County, Wabasha County, Winona County. Economic impact of on the South East region The annual economic impact of the in the South East region reaches $307 million (Figure 2). Based on the South East region economy of $22.6 billion, this means that for every $100 produced in the South East region, $1 is directly or indirectly related to. The sources of these direct and indirect impacts are the institution s operations ($168 million), students expenditures ($137 million), and investments ($2 million). The economic impact of 4 Wilder Research, February 2013

2. Economic impact of in the South East region in 2011 ($ millions) $210.3 $307 $96.5 Direct Indirect/Induced Total Real estate is the main industry sector impacted by Winona State, with $102 million supported by the university. Other industries impacted by are state and local government education (e.g. public universities), and food services and drinking places (e.g. restaurants, bars, etc.). Figure 3 below shows the top ten industries affected by in 2011. 3. Top ten industries impacted by in the South East region in 2011 ($ millions) Real estate establishments 101.9 State and local government education 44.6 Food services and drinking places 22.7 Child day care services 16.5 Telecommunications 11.9 Imputed rental activity for owner-occupied dwellings 6.7 Medical and diagnostic labs and outpatient and other ambulatory care services 5.4 Wholesale trade businesses 4.8 Personal and household goods repair and maintenance 4.1 Retail Stores - Food and beverage 3.9 Impact on jobs During 2011, generated an estimated 3,875 jobs in the South East region. These jobs include 3,040 direct jobs generated by the university and its students, and 835 additional indirect jobs, created by vendors, contractors, and businesses supplying inputs to the university and its students (Figure 4). The economic impact of 5 Wilder Research, February 2013

4. Impact on employment of in the South East region in 2011 (jobs) 3,040 3,875 835 Direct Indirect/Induced Total The sources of these direct and indirect impacts are the institution s operations (2,240 jobs), students expenditures (1,615 jobs), and investments (20 jobs). A total of 1,732 jobs are created directly by the university s operational activities (Figure 5). 5. Impact on employment of in the South East region by source (jobs) Direct Indirect Total Operational expenditures 1,732 508 2,240 Students' spending 1,294 321 1,615 Investments 14 6 20 Total 3,040 835 3,875 The same three industries mentioned before are also the most impacted by the university in its employment, directly or indirectly (Figure 6). 6. Top ten industries impacted by employment in 2011 (jobs) State and local government education 1,644 Food services and drinking places 437 Real estate establishments 435 Child day care services 280 Retail Stores - Food and beverage 91 Retail Stores - Clothing and clothing accessories 59 Personal and household goods repair and maintenance 42 Medical and diagnostic labs and outpatient and other ambulatory care services 39 Employment services 34 Retail Stores - General merchandise 34 The economic impact of 6 Wilder Research, February 2013

Impact on taxes generates about $17 million in tax revenues for state and local governments each year. Through its operational activities, its employees and students spending, supports the activities of the South East region by paying sales, property, and income taxes. Similarly, the university and its employees social insurance contributions add to the state tax revenues. Since s operational activities and spending create demand for other businesses and industry sectors, additional tax revenues come from businesses that serve the university. These taxes include sales, income, and property taxes, along with others, such as corporate taxes. Benefits beyond operations: enhanced productivity By educating its students, enhances the productivity of both public and private organizations in Minnesota. Its alumni provide the skills and knowledge needed to improve the functioning of many organizations in the state. Since performing a direct measurement of the contribution of graduates to Minnesota businesses and governments is not feasible, we estimate the additional earnings of graduates as a result of their training. This measure of additional earnings is equivalent to estimating the increase in productivity due to students education; the students are able to earn more as they better fit the needs of businesses and government. Only considering the 1,669 associate, bachelor s, master s, post-master s, and doctorate degrees awarded by in 2011, this is equivalent to $301.2 million of future value created in the state. Unlike previous estimations in this report, this is an additional value to the state, not just the region, since we cannot know where the students live after graduation. 3 Some studies present the enhanced productivity without discounting the future income received by students (for example, the Tripp Umbach study for the University of Minnesota). If we calculate the additional future earnings in this way, the economic benefit from enhanced productivity reaches $521 million. 4 3 This estimation assumes 40 years of work life, a discount rate of 3 percent and two important parameters. The first one is that the total is adjusted by 30 percent (similar to Tripp Umback s 2011 report for the University of Minnesota), to allow for the forgone income while attending the college or university, future periods of unemployment, time out of the labor force, and other events. The second parameter included in the estimation is that 80 percent of students stay in the state after graduation (MnSCU Amazing Facts, 2010). The economic value created by the enhanced productivity of students should consider only those students staying in the state; if they leave there is not economic impact for Minnesota in the years following their graduation. 4 Tripp Umbach (2011). The Economic and Societal Impact of the University of Minnesota. The economic impact of 7 Wilder Research, February 2013