Whistleblower protection in the United Nations
|
|
- Nigel Hardy
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SMC-II/XXX 06 June 2013 Whistleblower protection in the United Nations Paper submitted by the Working Group on Investigations, Disciplinary Matters and Administration of Justice (WG AOJ) A) Background 1. The Working Group on Investigations, Disciplinary Matters and Administration of Justice (WG) has consistently expressed concerns about protection of whistle-blowers in the United Nations. At its last video-conference meeting, it discussed the latest developments with the landmark whistleblower case of Wasserstrom, which highlighted weaknesses in the protection of whistle-blowers from retaliation. The WG reiterated the importance to strengthen internal protections against whistleblower retaliation in the UN, and agreed to monitor the issue closely with a view to contributing to such efforts when the opportunity arises. Subworking group on investigations and disciplinary matters has also stressed the need to strengthen the whistleblower protection system by pointing to numerous weaknesses in investigations and disciplinary proceedings and has continued to address those weaknesses. 2. At its 69th session, the International Civil Service Commission recognized that whistleblower protection is among a number of ethical issues facing the organizations which was not adequately reflected in the former standards of conduct. The newlyadopted standards of conduct for the international civil service clearly state that an international civil servant who reports a breach of the organization s regulations and rules in good faith or who cooperates with an audit or investigation has the right to be protected against retaliation for doing so (Annex IV, para. 20, A/67/30). 3. Pursuant to section 1.1 of ST/SGB/2005/21, staff members have a duty to report any breach of the Organization s regulations and rules. When such reports are made in good faith, they are entitled to protection against retaliation. Section 1.3 provides that retaliation against individuals who have reported misconduct violates the fundamental obligation of all staff members to uphold the highest standards of efficiency, competence and integrity. 4. In at least three cases, staff members have filed applications with UN Dispute Tribunal (UNDT), challenging a determination made by the Ethics Office that they were not subject to retaliation. 5. The Secretary-General stated previously that a determination by the Ethics Office regarding retaliation should not be subject to challenge before the UNDT. As the independent status of the Ethics Office prevents the Secretary-General from instructing the Office how to make its determination of retaliation, the Secretary-General claimed he cannot be held liable for determinations made by the Office, even if they subsequently prove to be flawed (para. 276, A/66/275). 1
2 6. However, the President of the UNDT in his letter to the General Assembly stressed that in Hunt-Matthes and Wasserstrom, UNDT determined that decisions of the Ethics Office not to find prima facie retaliation have direct consequences for the rights of the applicants, thus making them appealable administrative decisions (A/66/507). This issue is yet to be determined by the UN Appeals Tribunal. 7. In light of the foregoing and given the increasing number of cases brought by staff through the formal system of the Administration of Justice, the WG presents below its conclusions and recommendations from the two most emblematic cases on the whistleblower protection. B) Hunt-Matthes 8. Caroline Hunt-Matthes made numerous disclosures regarding UNHCR practices: disclosures about interference/obstruction into an investigation of an alleged rape of a UN staff member in Sri Lanka by another staff member; the decision of the Inspector- General s Office (IGO) to hire a staff member who was himself under investigation by the IGO; the failure to register a sexual harassment complaint against the High Commissioner; the unlawful detention of refugees by senior UNHCR staff, leading to the death of a refugee while in detention; and a report of sexual exploitation of a refugee by a staff member. 9. In Hunt-Matthes UNDT/2011/063, UNDT s considered whether the decision of the Ethics Office amounts to an administrative decision. It found that when a claim relates to issues covered by ST/SGB/2005/21, a staff member is entitled to certain administrative procedures and that if he or she is dissatisfied with the outcome, he or she may request judicial review of the administrative decisions taken. 10. The judge concluded that the determination of the Ethics Office falls under its jurisdiction and as such, is competent to examine the administrative activity followed by the Administration after the Applicant s complaint of retaliation, and to decide if the action was taken in accordance with the applicable law. The decision of the Director of the Ethics Office communicated to the Applicant is an administrative decision for the purposes of article 2.1(a) of the UNDT Statute and accordingly, the application is deemed receivable. 11. In Hunt-Matthes UNDT/2013/085, UNDT considered if the Ethics Office was required to enquire whether the protected activities claimed by the Applicant were a contributing factor to the negative Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) and the subsequent non-renewal of her contract. The judge concluded that the Ethics Office had to establish whether the Administration could prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would have taken the same action absent the protected activity. It was not obliged to investigate the Applicant s complaint of retaliation. It only had to determine if there was a credible case of retaliation and, if so, refer it to OIOS for substantive investigation. 12. The judge stated that the Office overlooked or ignored information provided by Hunt-Matthes and failed to take into account the evidence before it regarding the list of parties to whom she d made a protected disclosure. The Tribunal held that the Ethics Office erred by relying on the PAR as the sole explanation for the decisions of the 2
3 Administration not to renew her contract. The Ethics Office took into account unverified facts and opinions about the Applicant and her performance, and failed to properly consider the Applicant s allegations of maladministration that gave rise to her complaints in the first place. 13. The case officer had a negative attitude toward the Applicant s case and wrote information in her case file that was factually incorrect. By failing to properly assess whether there was a link between the reporting of misconduct and the alleged retaliation, the Ethics Office denied or radically limited the protections that the Secretary-General clearly intended to afford to UN staff members. 14. The Ethics Office did not assess the Applicant s claim in conformity with the correct obligations, principles and standards because: i) It applied the wrong criteria in considering whether the Applicant had engaged in protected activities; ii) It overlooked her reports of misconduct; and iii) It failed to identify that the retaliatory acts alleged by the Applicant were the findings of unsatisfactory performance and subsequent nonrenewal. UNDT awarded the Applicant USD 8,000 for the stress and anxiety caused by the breaches committed by the Ethics Office. 15. In Hunt-Matthes UNDT/2013/084, the Tribunal upheld Hunt-Matthes claim that the negative PAR and the non-renewal of her Fixed-Term Appointment were acts of retaliation against her. Her performance was not correctly evaluated in accordance with the regulations and policies in force at the time and the Administration chose to mischaracterize her allegations as poor performance rather than to properly investigate them or refer one of them to OIOS, as she requested. 16. The judgment documents numerous shortcomings in the investigative procedures at UNHCR, including instances of overt interference from senior officials in the conduct and outcome of investigations designed to manipulate the whole process to get certain outcomes. The judge concluded that the failure of OIOS to investigate 1 and call these individuals to account as requested contributed to the costs to the Organization as ordered by this Tribunal. 17. The judge awarded Hunt-Matthes one year s full salary with full benefits, as well as USD 50,000 in moral damages. In addition, the judge awarded her additional GBP 6, in legal fees. Finally, UNDT referred a matter to Secretary-General Ban Kimoon for possible action to enforce accountability. C) Wasserstrom 18. James Wasserstrom served at the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and, in 2007, disclosed a possible kickback scheme involving local politicians and senior UNMIK officials related to a controversial proposed power plant. After his whistleblowing came to light, he was detained by UNMIK police officers on trumped-up charges, his home and person were illegally searched, his photograph was posted on all UNMIK premises barring his entry, his post was abolished and he was subjected to criminal and administrative investigations. After the conclusion of several reviews and investigations that found that 1 See also 2009 letter to the U.S. Ambassador to the UN, in which Government Accountability Project raised concerns about the failure of the OIOS to investigate this case specifically. 3
4 there had been no retaliation against Wasserstrom, his contract was terminated in November When Wasserstrom s superiors at UNMIK became aware of this investigation, they undertook actions that were later determined to have been retaliatory. In June 2007, Wasserstrom filed a complaint with the Ethics Office and sought protection as a whistleblower. The Office reviewed the complaint and on 29 July 2007 issued a letter with their finding that a prima facie case of retaliation existed in his case. It then referred the case to the OIOS for a full investigation. 20. OIOS conducted an investigation into Wasserstrom s complaint of retaliation and the Investigation Report containing several annexes was submitted to the Ethics Office in April OIOS concluded that no retaliation against Wasserstrom had taken place. 21. The Ethics Office reviewed the Investigation Report and informed Wasserstrom of the outcome of the investigation that no retaliation was found in his case. Wasserstrom responded that the OIOS Investigation Report contained misstatements of facts and requested that his case be investigated further. His request was subsequently brushed off by the Ethics Office, as the relevant provisions in ST/SGB/2005/21 did not call for further action. 22. In October 2008, Wasserstrom filed a complaint with the internal justice system claiming the Ethics Office had failed in its responsibilities to protect him. In July 2009, the case was transferred to the UN Dispute Tribunal. 23. In Wasserstrom UNDT/2012/092 on liability, the Tribunal concluded that Wasserstrom made his report of potential misconduct in good faith and that the burden of proof lies with the Administration to provide clear and convincing evidence that the same actions would have been taken absent the protected activity. The Ethics Office failed to do this and consequently committed an error of law and procedure. 24. The OIOS Investigation Report and its annexes contained factual inconsistencies and it was the responsibility of the Ethics Office to question and clarify them. It failed to do so. During the criminal and administrative investigations against Wasserstrom, his due process rights were violated. Neither OIOS in its report nor the Ethics Office in its review of the report questioned the excessive authority assumed by the UNMIK international prosecutor and pre-trial judge. The Ethics Office failed to ascertain the reasons for the humiliating and degrading treatment that Wasserstrom had been subjected to. Therefore, the Office s finding that no retaliation had taken place was fundamentally flawed. 25. In Wasserstrom UNDT/2013/053 on relief, the Tribunal dismissed Wasserstrom s claim for compensation for lost earnings and benefits because it was UNDP and not the Ethics Office that terminated his contract. The judge awarded the maximum award of USD 50,000 in non-pecuniary damages for the anxiety, stress and loss of reputation. The Respondent manifestly abused the proceedings by refusing the Tribunal s Orders and by not granting full access to the OIOS Investigation Report. The judge awarded USD 15,000 to compensate in part for Wasserstrom s expenses in legal costs. 26. Both parties have filed appeals with the UN Appeals Tribunal in May The Secretary-General s appeal challenges both the merits of the UNDT findings, as well as 4
5 the amount of compensation awarded. Wasserstrom s appeal claims that the award he was granted was insufficient and that UNDT misapplied the burden of proof standard for whistleblower cases resulting in an unreasonable decision. In a letter dated 8 April 2013 to US Secretary of State Kerry, Wasserstrom urged the US Government to withhold 15 per cent of its contributions to the UN budget in accordance with the 2012 US Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 2055). D) Conclusions and recommendations 27. The General Assembly noted the Secretary-General s intent to review the existing whistleblower protection policy and asked him to submit a report for its consideration at its 69 th session (para. 75, A/67/816). It also requested the Secretary-General to report on improvements made in the process for reporting misconduct, fact-finding and resolving situations resulting from misconduct, including, but not limited to, the following issues: (a) The relationship between the policy administered by the Ethics Office and the various oversight, adjudicative, disciplinary and dispute resolution mechanisms of the Organization; (b) Internal mechanisms for reporting misconduct, including through the supervisory chain of command; (c) Mechanisms external to divisions for reporting misconduct (para.77, A/67/816). The Secretary-General announced at a press conference in April 2013 that consultants had been hired to conduct such a review. 28. Fundamental weaknesses and flaws of the Ethics Office were highlighted by the above cases. First, the question is whether, as an office directly reporting to the Secretary-General, it can perform its functions in a truly independent and impartial manner. Secondly, the Office has a poor record of substantiating retaliation. Available statistics reveal grave shortcomings in the functioning of the Ethics Office. According to the research by Government Accountability Project, approximately 343 protection against retaliation inquiries were received by the Ethics Office from 2006 through July Following a preliminary review in 87 of these cases, it found only nine prima facie cases of retaliation. After further review, the Ethics Office found in favour of only one whistleblower, ultimately rejecting 99.7 per cent of retaliation claims. 29. The Ethics Office has also misapplied the burden of proof in retaliation cases which lies with the Administration. The Office is under-resourced, which seriously hampers its capability to study all complaints of retaliation brought to it for review fairly and competently. 30. The poorly conducted and documented investigation, containing factual inconsistencies, calls into question OIOS s competence to carry out complex investigations. OIOS has previously refused to investigate retaliation cases (Dzuverovic UNDT/NBI/2012/006). This lack of cooperation seriously undermines the Ethics Office s ability to protect whistleblowers. OIOS has also refused to make investigation reports public, which undermines transparency and accountability. 31. There are also weaknesses in the UNDT and UNAT statutes, including the cap on compensation awards, barring judges from awarding punitive or exemplary damages, making it difficult for judges to award costs to successful litigants, and the very short 60-day statute of limitations (best practice in whistleblower cases is at least 6 months) that makes it difficult or impossible for potential whistleblowers to gather sufficient documentation and evidence. 5
6 32. As one of the key stakeholders in the protection of whistle blowers, staff unions should participate in the review of the UN s whistleblower protection policy. 33. The UN whistleblower protection policy should be urgently reformed. In this context, the WG recommends the following issues for the Secretary-General to consider: a. Discipline retaliators in validated whistleblower cases. b. Adhere to orders and judgments issues by UNDT and UNAT in whistleblower cases. c. Re-adjudicate retaliation claims that were improperly declined by the Ethics Office. d. Institute mandatory training programmes on whistleblower protection and retaliation. e. Given the high number of Secretariat staff working under UNDP contracts, encourage all UN funds, programmes and agencies that have their own whistleblower policies to adhere to minimum standards of ST/SGB/2005/21. 6
http://www.whistleblower.org/sites/default/files/best_practices_document_for_website_revised_april_12_2 013.pdf
Representative Cases in Which the United Nations or its Funds, Programmes or Agencies have not Complied with Best Practices in Whistleblower Protection The 2014 U.S. Consolidated Appropriations Act requires
More informationOn Whistleblower Protection in the UN System Note Prepared by CCISUA
On Whistleblower Protection in the UN System Note Prepared by CCISUA May 2011 Introduction 1. At its 69 th Session, the International Civil Service Commission decided to review the standards of conduct
More informationTop Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies Effective 1
1612 K Street Suite 1100 Washington, DC, USA 20006 202-408-0034 fax: 202-408-9855 Website: www.whistleblower.org Top Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies
More informationHow To Protect A Whistleblower From Retaliation In The World Food Production Programme
Executive Director s Circular ETHICS OFFICE Date: 31 January 2008 Circular No.: ED2008/003 Revises: Amends: ED2006/011 Supersedes: Protection against retaliation for reporting misconduct and for cooperating
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationSecretary-General s bulletin Prohibition of discrimination, harassment, including sexual harassment, and abuse of authority
United Nations ST/SGB/2008/5 Secretariat 11 February 2008 Secretary-General s bulletin Prohibition of discrimination, harassment, including sexual harassment, and abuse of authority The Secretary-General,
More informationOffice of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.
Citation: Arkansas Code Annotated 21-1-601 through 608, 21-1-610; 21-1-123 and 124 Office of Personnel Management Policy 1 Forms: Fraud Reporting Complaint Form Definitions Adverse action: To discharge,
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico New Mexico has a pretty strong state whistleblower law: Scoring 72 out of a possible 100 points; Ranking 4 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee Tennessee has one of the strongest state whistleblower laws: Scoring 75 out of a possible 100; Ranking 3 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationWhistle Blower Policy National Engineering Industries Limited.
Whistle Blower Policy National Engineering Industries Limited. Khatipura Road, Jaipur 302006 Tel: 0141-2223221, Fax: 0141-2221926 Visit us at: www.nbcbearings.com 1 Introduction Our company has adopted
More informationHeritage Foods Whistle Blower Policy. HERITAGE FOODS LIMITED (Formerly known as M/s. Heritage Foods (India) Limited) WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
HERITAGE FOODS LIMITED (Formerly known as M/s. Heritage Foods (India) Limited) WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1 I. PREAMBLE This policy is formulated to provide an opportunity to employees and an avenue to raise
More informationBy: Gerald M. Richardson
MANAGING THE RISKS POSED BY THE THREE PUBLIC POLICY WRONGFUL DISCHARGE CASES RECENTLY DECIDED BY THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT By: Gerald M. Richardson I. An At Will Employee Can Sue His Employer on a Claim
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER POLICY. a) Code means the TALIC's code of conduct as in force from time to time;
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY Company s Vision: To be the most trusted Life Insurance Company that values Customers financial well being, consistently delivering best in class solutions and respected by all. The
More informationWhistleblower Protection Policy
Responsible Officer: SVP - Chief Compliance & Audit Officer Responsible Office: EC - Ethics, Compliance & Audit Services Issuance Date: April 23, 2015 Effective Date: May 1, 2015 Last Review Date: March
More informationHoward Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor
Howard Shapiro Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman U.S. Department of Labor The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 directs the DOL Inspector General to designate a Whistleblower Protection
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY POLICY Whistle Blower Policy under Vigil Mechanism of the Company. OBJECTIVE SCOPE COVERAGE MAIN FEATURES Improper Practice To provide directors, employees, customers and vendors
More informationDISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Content Policy statement 1. Principles 2. Standards 3. Disciplinary procedure 4. Investigation
More informationSouth Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms
South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms South Carolina whistleblowers who are employed by a South Carolina
More informationDoD Whistleblower Protection
DoD Whistleblower Protection Appropriated Fund Civilians What You Need to Know Department of Defense Inspector General Patrick Gookin DoD Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman Whistleblowerprotectionombudsman@dodig.mil
More informationDepartment of Defense DIRECTIVE
Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7050.06 April 17, 2015 IG DoD SUBJECT: Military Whistleblower Protection References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 7050.06
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
OBJECTIVE Whistle Blower Policy This policy seeks the support of RBNL employees, channel partners and vendors to report Significant deviations from key management policies and report any non-compliance
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
I. PREAMBLE This afresh policy is formulated to establish a vigil mechanism and to provide an opportunity to Director(s)/employee(s) and an avenue to raise concerns and to access in good faith the Chairman
More informationAURAT FOUNDATION WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY
AURAT FOUNDATION WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY Approved by the Board of Governors March 2013 1 Contents Section 1 Introduction 3 Section 2 What does this policy cover? 3 Section 3 What is Whistleblowing? 3 Section
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania has a passable state whistleblower law: Scoring 61 out of a possible 100; Ranking 17 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationCompliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY and TOOMEY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures Purpose:
More informationA summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
BLACK HILLS SPECIAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE'S POLICY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION CONCERNING FALSE CLAIMS LIABILITY, ANTI-RETALIATION PROTECTIONS FOR REPORTING WRONGDOING AND DETECTING AND PREVENTING FRAUD, WASTE
More informationCentral LHIN Governance Manual. Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003
Central LHIN Governance Manual Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003 Purpose: Originated: September 25, 2012 Board Approved: September 25, 2012 To set out the LHIN s obligations under the Public
More informationMALAYSIAN TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SDN. BHD.
MALAYSIAN TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SDN. BHD. WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY AND GUIDELINES 16 March 2012 Version 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY Page WHISTLEBLOWING GUIDELINES B1 DEFINITION
More informationKYIV RECOMMENDATIONS ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN EASTERN EUROPE, SOUTH CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Max Planck Minerva Research Group on Judicial Independence KYIV RECOMMENDATIONS ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN EASTERN EUROPE, SOUTH CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL
More informationAction Construction Equipment Limited. Whistle Blower Policy
Action Construction Equipment Limited Whistle Blower Policy 1. PURPOSE The policy is formulated to provide an opportunity to employees to report to the management instances of unethical behavior, actual
More informationINVESTIGATION GUIDELINES. October 2012
INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES October 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 3 2. OAI s Mission and the Nature of OAI Investigations... 3 3. Confidentiality... 5 4. Investigation Standards... 6 5. Standard of
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2015 Kentucky
Accountability Report Card Summary 2015 Kentucky Kentucky has a fair state whistleblower law: Scoring 54 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 33 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationWHISTLE BLOWER POLICY / VIGIL MECHANISM SHCIL
WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY / VIGIL MECHANISM SHCIL 1 1. Background Stock Holding Corporation of India Limited (SHCIL) believes in conduct of the affairs of its constituents in a fair and transparent manner
More informationWhistle Blower Policy
22 Ulsoor Road, Bangalore - 42 Section No : WB-A Copy No : Page No : 1 of 9 Whistle Blower Policy 22 Ulsoor Road, Bangalore - 42 Section No : WB-B Copy No : Page No : 2 of 9 Contents Sl. No. Title Section
More informationQueensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short
More informationWhistleblower Policy
Whistleblower Policy The Feedback Group including Feedback Infra, its subsidiaries and associate companies, is committed to conducting its affairs ethically and lawfully. The Group's philosophy on ethics
More informationS. ll. To provide anti-retaliation protections for antitrust whistleblowers. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
OLL TH CONGRESS ST SESSION S. ll To provide anti-retaliation protections for antitrust whistleblowers. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES llllllllll Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Massachusetts has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 11 th out of 51 (50 states and the
More informationPLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013.
PLEASE NOTE: THIS POLICY WILL END EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 10, 2013 AND WILL BE REPLACED BY THE INTERACTIVE RESOLUTION POLICY ON NOVEMBER 11, 2013. TOYOTA ASSOCIATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ( T-ADR ): Summary Description
More informationWhistleblower Program
AUDITOR OF STATE WA S H I N G T O N NOV 11, 1889 Washington State Auditor s Office Whistleblower Program Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the Whistleblower Program? Independence Respect Integrity
More informationIndiaFirst Life Insurance Company Ltd. Whistle Blower Policy
IndiaFirst Life Insurance Company Ltd. Whistle Blower Policy Index 1. Preface...3 2. Definitions...3 3. Scope...3 4. Eligibility...4 5. Disqualification...4 6. Procedure...4 7. Investigation...5 8. Protection...6
More informationMinimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions
Minimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions Roadmap 1. Definition of Retaliation 2. Frequency & Severity
More informationORI Gu idel in es f o r Inst it u t ion s an d Wh ist l eblow e rs: (November 20, 1995)
ORI Gu idel in es f o r Inst it u t ion s an d Wh ist l eblow e rs: Responding to Possible Retaliation Against Whistleblowers in Extramural Research (November 20, 1995) I. INTRODUCTION The Office of Research
More informationVIGIL MECHANISM CUM WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
VIGIL MECHANISM CUM WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY VIGIL MECHANISM CUM WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY I. PREAMBLE This policy is formulated to provide opportunity to Director(s) and employee(s) to access in good faith to
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2015 Session HB 1187 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE House Bill 1187 Judiciary (Delegates Carter and Anderson) Public Safety - Law Enforcement Officers
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Oklahoma
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Oklahoma Oklahoma has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 58 out of a possible 100; Ranking 24 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationDISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURES DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE Date: 5 May 2015 Approved: 3 June 2015 Review date: 22 April 2018 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NOTES OF GUIDANCE Counselling General Principles Investigation Minor Matters
More informationAdministrative Bulletin
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DATE: 1/27/2015 NO. 15-03 EXPIRES: Indefinite DISTRIBUTION: A - MANAGEMENT Administrative Bulletin x B - MGMT& SUPERVISORY C - ALL EMPLOYEES SUBJECT Equal Employment
More informationWhistleblower Policy HR-PO718, 1.1
Whistleblower Policy HR-PO718, 1.1 Sharda Centre, Off Karve Road, Erandwane, Pune, Maharashtra, India 411004 www.techmahindra.com Copyright 2013, Tech Mahindra. All rights reserved. Table of Contents 1.
More informationAppendix I: Select Federal Legislative. Proposals Addressing Compensation for Asbestos-Related Harms or Death
Appendix I: Select Legislative Appendix I: Select Federal Legislative is and Mesothelioma Benefits Act H.R. 6906, 93rd 1973). With respect to claims for benefits filed before December 31, 1974, would authorize
More informationDISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES CASH PAYMENT WRITTEN WARNING. We provide an overview of what employers should include in their procedures.
DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES We provide an overview of what employers should include in their procedures. CASH PAYMENT Employers can dismiss an employee, even if they have not heard an outstanding
More informationAN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Codification District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition 2010 Winter Supp. West Group Publisher To amend the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive
More informationTHOMSON PRESS (INDIA) LIMITED VIGIL MECHANISM & WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY
THOMSON PRESS (INDIA) LIMITED VIGIL MECHANISM & WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY 1. Introduction 1.1 The Company believes in the conduct of the affairs of its constituents in a fair and transparent manner by adopting
More informationCCASE: NORTHCUTT, MYERS AND EBERLE v. IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES DDATE: 19910529 TTEXT:
CCASE: NORTHCUTT, MYERS AND EBERLE v. IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES DDATE: 19910529 TTEXT: ~1051 Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges The Federal Building Room
More informationSTATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL
STATUTE OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL Adopted by Commonwealth Governments on 1 July 1995 and amended by them on 24 June 1999, 18 February 2004, 14 May 2005, 16 May 2007 and 28 May 2015.
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 741. Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 01 H 1 HOUSE BILL 1 Short Title: Shift Workers' Bill of Rights. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Brockman, Baskerville, Harrison, and Fisher (Primary
More informationORDER MO-2114 Appeal MA-060192-1 York Regional Police Services Board
ORDER MO-2114 Appeal MA-060192-1 York Regional Police Services Board Tribunal Services Department Services de tribunal administratif 2 Bloor Street East 2, rue Bloor Est Suite 1400 Bureau 1400 Toronto,
More informationCompliance Requirements for Healthcare Carriers
INFORMATION DRIVES SOUND ANALYSIS, INSIGHT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE ADVISORY Compliance Requirements for Healthcare Carriers Introduction With the introduction of the new healthcare exchanges in January 2014
More informationUNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Implementation of article 33 in the Romanian legislation
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Implementation of article 33 in the Romanian legislation 1. LEGISLATION In 2004, a specific law on whistleblower protection was passed in Romania. The Whistleblower
More informationF I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these
More informationIMAX CORPORATION PROTOCOL FOR REPORTING SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS OF THE IMAX CODE OF ETHICS. (Whistle Blower Program)
IMAX CORPORATION PROTOCOL FOR REPORTING SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS OF THE IMAX CODE OF ETHICS (Whistle Blower Program) November 2004 (updated February 2012) PROTOCOL FOR REPORTING SUSPECTED VIOLATIONS OF THE
More informationADMINISTRATIVE POLICY SECTION: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Revised Date: 2/26/15 TITLE: FALSE CLAIMS ACT & WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS
Corporate Compliance Plan AD-819-0 Reporting of Compliance Concerns & Non-retaliation AD-807-0 Compliance Training Policy CFC ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AD-819-1 SECTION: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Revised Date:
More informationStar Union Dai-ichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Whistleblower Policy
Star Union Dai-ichi Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Whistleblower Policy Whistle Blower Policy ver 1.1 Page 1 DOCUMENT CONTROL Document version This Whistle Blower Policy document is version 1.1. Revision history
More informationDAPTO HIGH SCHOOL. YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES Preliminary Mid-Course Examination 2009
DAPTO HIGH SCHOOL YEAR 11 LEGAL STUDIES Preliminary Mid-Course Examination 2009 General Instructions: Reading time 5 minutes Working time 1 ½ hours Write using blue or black pen Write your Student Number/Name
More informationWIGAN COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY
WIGAN COUNCIL WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 Employees are often the first to realise that there may be something seriously wrong within the Council. However, they may not express their concerns
More informationGrievance, Whistle blowing and Disciplinary, including Dismissals
eastsussex.gov.uk Grievance, Whistle blowing and Disciplinary, including Dismissals This document will provide you with information on Grievance, Whistle blowing and Disciplinary procedures, including
More informationHERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES. Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions
HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Date: October 8, 2013 Rationale: It is Heritage Farm s intent to make sure all claims are submitted in a timely
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
More informationWHISTLEBLOWING POLICY NUS policies adopted and adapted by Yale-NUS College
WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY NUS policies adopted and adapted by Yale-NUS College Introduction 1. The University and Yale-NUS College (the College) are not-for-profit organizations that rely largely on public
More informationVice President's Office Whistleblower Policy. Approved by: Board of Directors Frequency of Review: Every 3 Year(s)
Vice President's Office Whistleblower Policy Policy No.: HR-067 Section: H.06 Date Issued: 2007-Sep-17 (yyyy-mmm-dd) Supersedes Policy Dated: 2005-Nov-04 (yyyy-mmm-dd) Approved by: Board of Directors Frequency
More information(A) There are other available remedies that the complainant can reasonably be expected to pursue;
Sec. 4-61dd. Whistle-blowing. Disclosure of information to Auditors of Public Accounts. Investigation by Attorney General. Rejection of complaint. Complaints re retaliatory personnel actions. Report to
More informationCORPORATE COMPLIANCE: BILLING & CODING COMPLIANCE
SUBJECT: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE: BILLING & CODING COMPLIANCE MISSION: Quality, honesty and integrity, in everything we do, are important values to all of us who are associated with ENTITY NAME ( ENTITY NAME
More informationCODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT
CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT Date of Issue: 22 January 2015 Version number: 2 LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Luxfer Holdings PLC is committed to conducting its business
More informationPolicy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act
Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act SCOPE OF POLICY This policy applies to all CFS employees, including trainees, volunteers,
More information118th Session Judgment No. 3347
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 118th Session Judgment No. 3347 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the fourth
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION. Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012
I. Federal Whistleblower Protection: WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012 A. Sarbanes Oxley: Most recent law
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationAny civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
More informationCorporate Compliance Policy Concerning the False Claims Acts, Anti- Retaliation Protections, and Detecting and Responding to Fraud
PAGE NUMBER: 1 of 16 ACCOUNTABILITY: President and Chief Executive Officer OBJECTIVES: RELATION TO MISSION: Our Lady of Lourdes Health Care Services, Inc. ( OLLHCS, Inc. ), a Catholic health system and
More informationLAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION
File: E-11 LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF DD/DEEPWOOD BOARD POLICY Reviewed and Adopted by the Board: Date: February 28, 2011 Signature on file Elfriede Roman, Superintendent I. SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS PREVENTION
More informationMetropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]
Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS] POLICY PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: Detection and Prevention of Fraud, Waste, and Abuse and
More informationSM ENERGY COMPANY CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY
SM ENERGY COMPANY CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY We at SM Energy Company are committed to compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and to conducting our business
More informationClient complaint management policy
Client complaint management policy 1. Policy purpose This policy implements section 219A of the Public Service Act 2008 in the Department of Justice and Attorney-General (DJAG). Under this section, Queensland
More informationWHISTLE BLOWING POLICY & PROCEDURES
Management Circular No: GCSL/01.2013 Revised: 01/2014 WHISTLE BLOWING POLICY & PROCEDURES All rights reserved. No part contained in this Policy may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written
More informationConviction Integrity Unit Best Practices October 15, 2015
Conviction Integrity Unit Best Practices October 15, 2015 District Attorney s offices are increasingly creating Conviction Integrity Units (CIUs) to re examine questionable convictions and guard against
More informationIn some cases, whistleblowers may bring a case before an employment tribunal, which can award compensation.
WHISTLEBLOWING Introduction This factsheet has been produced to provide advice on how to negotiate agreements and procedures on whistleblowing for branch officers and stewards. UNISON recognises that employees
More informationVIGIL MECHANISM / WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF ESTEEM BIO ORGANIC FOOD PROCESSING LIMITED (Company)
VIGIL MECHANISM / WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY OF ESTEEM BIO ORGANIC FOOD PROCESSING LIMITED (Company) 1. PREMBLE 1.1. Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013 requires every listed company to establish a vigil
More information4. A tribunal constituted under this Section may not decide claims that fall outside of the scope of this Article.
Section 6: Investor-State Dispute Settlement Article X.17: Scope of a Claim to Arbitration 1. Without prejudice to the rights and obligations of the Parties under Chapter [XY](Dispute Settlement), an investor
More informationPART THREE: TEMPLATE POLICY ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND THE WORKPLACE
PART THREE: TEMPLATE POLICY ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE AND THE WORKPLACE Draft Organization s Bulletin The Secretary-General, for the purpose of preventing and addressing cases of Genderbased Violence (as
More informationHow To Handle A Wrongdoer In A State Agency
NASSAU COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY This Policy is adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Public Authorities Accountability Act of 2005 and the Public Authorities Reform
More informationRESOLVING DISPUTES AT WORK: New procedures for discipline and grievances A GUIDE FOR EMPLOYEES
RESOLVING DISPUTES AT WORK: New procedures for discipline and grievances A GUIDE FOR EMPLOYEES This guide tells you about new rights and procedures you must follow if you have a grievance in work are facing
More informationM O N T S E R R A T PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT 2014 No. 12 of 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY... 3
M O N T S E R R A T PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT 2014 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY... 3 1 Short title and commencement... 3 2 Interpretation... 4 PART 2 PUBLIC SERVICE CODE OF CONDUCT... 10
More information1. This is an appeal by Gregor McGill FRICS & Gregor C. McGill & Co. (firm).
ROYAL INSTITUTION OF CHARTERED SURVEYORS APPEAL PANEL HEARING Case of Mr Gregor McGill [0044030] and Gregor C. McGill & Co (firm) [004755] Cheshire, WA2 On Friday 13 March 2015 At Warrington Village Urban
More informationINTER- AGENCY STANDING COMMITTEE (IASC) TASK FORCE ON PSEA UNDP 11/21/2013. Content Contributors:
INTER- AGENCY STANDING COMMITTEE (IASC) TASK FORCE ON PSEA Challenges and options in improving recruitment processes in the context of Protection from Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) by our own staff
More informationDisciplinary and Dismissals Policy
Policy Purpose/statement/reason for being Disciplinary and Dismissals Policy E.G - MIP is designed to strengthen the effectiveness of individual s contribution to the Council s success. Purpose The Disciplinary
More informationInventec Corporation Ethical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles
Inventec Corporation Ethical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles (This English version is a translation based on the original Chinese version. Where any discrepancy arises between the two versions,
More informationRaising concerns (Whistleblowing) Policy and Procedure
Raising concerns (Whistleblowing) Policy and Procedure The Public Interest Disclosure Act provides strong protection for workers who blow the whistle on or raise a genuine concern about malpractice. The
More informationSULLIVAN COUNTY EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION FACT SHEET # 31
SULLIVAN COUNTY EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION FACT SHEET # 31 SULLIVAN COUNTY CORPORATE COMPLIANCE SUBJECT: FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATEMENT OF POLICY: Sullivan County is committed to providing quality health care in
More informationKINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA. Capital Market Authority CREDIT RATING AGENCIES REGULATIONS
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA Capital Market Authority CREDIT RATING AGENCIES REGULATIONS English Translation of the Official Arabic Text Issued by the Board of the Capital Market Authority Pursuant to its Resolution
More informationTitle: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10
Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10 Reference Number: I-70 Effective Date: 10/02 Contact Person:
More information