Free Trade Agreements and State-Level Trade. By Joan Shipps Office of Trade Policy Analysis Industry Analysis
|
|
- Doris Chase
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Free Trade Agreements and State-Level Trade By Joan Shipps Office of Trade Policy Analysis Industry Analysis February 7, 2013
2 Free Trade Agreements and State-Level Trade Executive Summary: OTPA has conducted an analysis of U.S. trade with FTA partners by state in order to identify the impact of FTAs at more specific and local levels. The main results of the analysis are that states trading patterns with FTA partners are generally a function of their global trade propensity (e.g., states that trade a lot with the world also trade a lot with FTA markets), and that NAFTA is by far the most significant FTA for the majority of individual states. Other causes of state trading patterns with FTA partners, such as the product sector composition of trade and geographical proximity, are also explored. Technical notes: Unless otherwise stated, statistics in this paper are derived from state-level trade data queries to the Trade Policy Information System (TPIS), an International Trade Administration database on U.S. and state-level trade. TPIS source data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau s Foreign Trade Division. The trade data discussed covers only trade in merchandise, and excludes the exports and imports of services. As such, this paper only concerns itself with trade in merchandise, including manufactured items, agricultural products, and oil. Additionally, state-level data uses a different methodology to calculate export and import values. This paper will therefore refrain from calculating state-level trade balances to avoid errors inherent in combining unlike data sources. However, trade balance data at the national level is provided. To the extent that trade balances are discussed in this paper, it will be at the national level only. Additional technical notes concerning the limitations of the data can be found at the end of this paper. Introduction: Free trade agreements (FTAs) are increasingly important to U.S. trade. In 2011, the United States had FTAs with 17 countries, 1 most of which were not in place 10 years ago. In 2012, the United States entered into FTAs with three additional countries: Korea, Colombia, and Panama. While analyses on national trade with FTA countries are widely available, there are few public resources analyzing FTA trade at the state level. Policymakers at the state and regional levels, however, have an interest in how their local economies are particularly affected by the growing significance of FTAs. 1 The 17 countries with which the United States had an FTA in 2011 were: Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Israel, Jordan, Mexico, Morocco, Nicaragua, Oman, Peru, and Singapore.
3 Recognizing the information gap, ITA has conducted the following analysis on FTAs and their distributional effects across states. 2 The paper consists of two primary sections: 1. Putting state-level FTA trade in context: A brief overview of U.S. trade with FTA countries, with emphasis on how relative levels of FTA trade are distributed among states; 2. Who trades with whom, and why: An analysis of the major factors contributing to states relative levels of trade with FTA partners. While general state-level trade trends are discussed throughout this paper, trade information on individual states is available in the paper s annexes. In particular: Annex 1contains data on individual states 2011 trade with FTA countries and with the world; Annex 2 contains data on how individual states exports to FTA countries were distributed in 2011; Annex 3 contains data on how individual states imports from FTA countries were distributed in For the purposes of this paper, states refers to the U.S. Customs Territory (the 50 U.S. states, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia).
4 1. Putting state-level FTA trade in context: 3 Table 1 Comparison of 2011 U.S. trade with FTA partners and the world (values expressed in billions of U.S. dollars) FTA trading partners All trading partners % FTA share Number of trading partners 17 >= % GDP 4 $5, $69, % U.S. exports to $ $1, % U.S. industrial exports to 5 $ $1, % U.S. imports from $ $2, % Trade balance -$ $ % Trade balance, excluding oil 6 $ $ n/a Table 1 contains data comparing 2011 trade between 2011 U.S. trade with FTA partners and with the world generally. Primary findings from this data, and from state-specific data identified in Annex 1, include: The United States trades disproportionately with FTA countries. In 2011, FTA countries accounted for: 3 percent of U.S. trading partners and 8 percent of U.S. trading partners GDP; 41.9 percent of U.S. industrial exports to the world; 41.4 percent of U.S. exports and 30.8 percent of U.S. imports. The United States tends to fare better, in terms of trade balances, with FTA countries than with the world generally. In 2011: At 9.1 percent, the United States trade deficit with FTA countries as a share of its trade deficit with the world was proportionately smaller than either the United States global share of exports or imports accounted for by FTA countries; Excluding oil, the United States has a trade surplus with FTA countries, while maintaining a sizeable deficit with the world. 3 Section 1 of this paper, Putting state-level FTA trade in context, uses national-level, rather than state-level TPIS data, to provide trade balances and meaningful context for state-specific analysis that follows. 4 GDP figures are from the Central Intelligence Agency s (CIA) World Fact Book, link: 5 Industrial products are generally defined as non-agricultural goods. 6 Oil is defined as all products falling under the two-digit chapter heading 27 in the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
5 2. Who trades with whom, and why FTA trade is important for most states, but not all states trade with the same FTA countries and in the same quantities. There are various factors affecting the scope of states relationships with their FTA partners; the four most notable are listed below. It should be noted that these factors are not mutually exclusive, nor do they affect all states to equal extents. a) NAFTA; b) States overall trade tendencies; c) The product composition of states imports and exports; d) Geography. a) NAFTA Percentage Range Table 2 Number of states trading with NAFTA countries in 2011, arranged by import and export shares Exports to Canada as % of FTA exports Exports to Mexico as % of FTA exports Exports to NAFTA as % of FTA exports Exports to NAFTA as % of world exports Imports from Canada as % of FTA imports Imports from Mexico as % of FTA imports Imports from NAFTA as % of FTA imports Imports from NAFTA as % of world imports 0%-25% %-50% %-75% %-100% Table 2 identifies the number of states trading in various proportions with NAFTA countries, relative to their trade with FTA countries and with the world generally. Primary findings from this data include: Most U.S. states have no more important FTA trading partners than Canada, Mexico, or both. In 2011: 34 states exports to Canada and Mexico made up at least 75 percent of their exports to all FTA partners; 33 states exports to NAFTA countries made up at least 25 percent of their exports to the world; 40 states imports from FTA countries were at least 75 percent accounted for by imports from Canada and/or Mexico; 29 states imports from the world were at least 25 percent accounted for by imports from NAFTA countries.
6 b) States overall trade tendencies States relative tendencies to trade with the FTA countries tend to mirror the levels of trade they engage in with the world overall. In general, states that trade the most with the world are also among those states that trade the most with FTA countries, while states that trade the least with the world tend to be among those states that trade the least with FTA countries. Notably, many states that do not trade much with FTA countries in value terms still have high shares of FTA trade relative to their trade with the world. North Dakota, South Dakota, and New Mexico, for example, are among the states that export the least to the world, but more than 60 percent of what each of these states does export goes to FTA countries. Other trends on big states, small states, and their relative trade with FTA countries, as derived from 2011 trade data, include: States that trade the most with the world have the highest values of trade with most FTA countries, collectively and on a country-specific basis; As a share of world exports, the percentage of FTA exports tends to be relatively constant among states that export the least to FTA countries and states that export the most to FTA countries, in value terms; States with the lowest shares of world exports accounted for by FTA countries still send, on average, about one-fifth of their exports to FTA markets. Annexes 1, 2, and 3 contain specific data on state-level trade with FTA countries overall, the world, and individual FTA partners. c) The product composition of states imports and exports Product composition affects state-level trade flows. Most states export and import a wide range of products when trading with FTA countries. Some states, however, are more specialized than others in terms of what they tend to export and import, and this specialization can have significant impacts on how much a state trades with FTA partners, and on with which FTA partners a state tends to trade. As noted in Table 3, 18 states 2011 exports to FTA countries, for example, were at least 30 percent made up of goods within a single industry. 7 7 In this context, the term industry corresponds with the chapter headings in the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
7 Table 3 States whose exports to FTA countries are at least 30 percent composed of a single industry 8 State Industry Industry description % exports to FTA countries Alabama 87 Motor vehicles 41.2% Alaska 26 Ores 55.0% D.C. Washington 88 Air and spacecraft 65.9% Delaware 30 Pharmaceuticals 46.8% Hawaii 88 Air and spacecraft 64.9% Indiana 87 Motor vehicles 38.3% Louisiana 27 Oil 49.2% Michigan 87 Motor vehicles 43.4% Missouri 87 Motor vehicles 30.6% New Hampshire 85 Electrical machinery, equipment 40.7% New Mexico 85 Electrical machinery, equipment 42.8% North Dakota 27 Oil 31.5% Oklahoma 84 Nuclear machinery, equipment 32.6% Puerto Rico 30 Pharmaceuticals 43.6% Rhode Island 71 Jewelry, precious gems & metals 41.2% Vermont 85 Electrical machinery, equipment 65.2% Virgin Islands 27 Oil 99.4% Wyoming 28 Inorganic chemicals & metal compounds 38.7% While there are a number of examples of how product composition affects FTA trade relationships, below are two of the most definitive cases in which sectoral trade explained state FTA trading patterns. While product-specific trade data are not included in this paper due to space considerations, state-level trade data and information on states shares of FTA trade with specific FTA partners are derived from the general trade data in Annex 1 and the country-specific trade data in Annexes 2 and 3. In 2011, Washington, D.C. exported the least to and imported the least from FTA countries of any area in the nation, but was also the country s 7 th largest exporter, by value, to Bahrain, Morocco, and Oman. The vast majority of exports to the world that were shipped from Washington, D.C were in the areas of aerospace and defense. Meanwhile, products that Bahrain, Morocco, and Oman imported from the United States the most in 2011, by value, included airplanes and helicopters. The product composition compatibility between exports that pass through Washington, D.C. and Bahrain, Morocco, and Oman s imports from the United States is likely due to the fact that Washington, D.C. is home to policymakers with vested interests in defense and security in the Middle East. As such, Washington, D.C. not only primarily exports defense articles, its primary export markets are in the Middle East. 8 In this context, the term industry corresponds with the chapter headings in the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
8 New York was single-handedly responsible for absorbing more than a 38 percent of all U.S. imports from Israel in 2011 more than any other state. New York s largest category of imports from the world in 2011 covered jewels, precious metals, and jewelry items generally, and accounted for more than a quarter, by value, of the state s total imports. The single largest Israeli export to the United States in 2011, by value, was diamonds. The product composition of New York s imports and Israel s exports were sufficiently compatible that 89.4 percent of New York s imports from Israel in 2011 were diamonds. d) Geography In the cases where FTA partners are located in relative proximity to U.S. states, geography can be a factor in whether or not a given state will trade more or less with a particular FTA country. Based on 2011 trade data, examples of probable geographic impacts on state-level FTA trade include: The three states with more than 80 percent of their FTA exports going to Canada were Vermont, Maine, and North Dakota all of which are situated along the Canadian border. At 34.2 percent, Australia s share of Hawaii s FTA exports was more than double that of any other state in the nation. Hawaii also had the country s highest share at 26.4 percent of FTA exports destined for Singapore. Florida was the ninth largest exporter to FTA countries by value, and some 31.0 percent of its FTA exports went to CAFTA member countries. While Florida is indeed one of the country s major exporters, it appears especially good at exporting to six, small nearby countries in Central America. Should this trend continue going forward, one might expect Florida to also become a major exporter by value and/or by share to Colombia and Panama, which became new FTA partners in As noted previously in this paper, states that tend to trade the most with FTA countries tend to do so across the board, regardless of the relative location of the state s FTA partner. Annexes 2 and 3 provide data on the country-specific composition of individual states trade with FTA countries in Additional technical notes The following are notes, per the U.S. Census Bureau s Foreign Trade Division, on this paper s source data, including state- and national-level export and import data. 9 General source data definitions In this paper, exports refer exclusively to total merchandise exports, a combination of domestic exports and foreign exports. Domestic exports are 9 Technical notes on source data are available from the U.S. Census Bureau s Foreign Trade Division, link:
9 defined as: Exports of domestic merchandise include commodities which are grown, produced or manufactured in the United States, and commodities of foreign origin which have been changed in the United States, including U.S. Foreign Trade Zones, from the form in which they were imported, or which have been enhanced in value by further manufacture in the United States. Foreign exports are defined as: Exports of foreign merchandise (re-exports) consist of commodities of foreign origin which have entered the United States for consumption or into Customs bonded warehouses or U.S. Foreign Trade Zones, and which, at the time of exportation, are in substantially the same condition as when imported. Meanwhile, references to imports in this paper refer to general imports. These types of imports are defined as: General Imports measure the total physical arrivals of merchandise from foreign countries, whether such merchandise enters consumption channels immediately or is entered into bonded warehouses or Foreign Trade Zones under Customs custody. Limitations of state-level trade data State-level export data limitations In certain cases, the export origin of movement does not reflect the transportation origin. Specifically whenever shipments are consolidated, the state will reflect the consolidation point rather than the origin of movement. This effect is particularly noticeable for agricultural shipments. For these shipments intermediaries located in inland states are shipping agricultural commodities down the Mississippi River for export from the port of New Orleans. In this case, the state reflects Louisiana, the state where the port of New Orleans is located, as the state of origin of movement. The states in which the commodities were grown and originally shipped are lost. Another impact is on the states of distribution for non-manufactured exports. When goods are generally stored and then exported by central offices or intermediaries. The most visible result is to understate exports from the original production state and to overstate exports from the general office or consolidation point. For example, New York has ports that handle high-value shipments of non-manufactured products that may stand out. State-level import data limitations In certain cases, the state of destination may not reflect the final location for which the imported goods are destined. Rather for these shipments, the state of destination, as known at the time the entry documentation is filed, may reflect an intermediary, storage or distribution point. From there, these shipments may later be distributed to another location in another state as the ultimate destination. For example, a consolidated shipment of many automobiles may be shipped by the importing company to a distribution point in one state with the intent of later shipping the automobiles to numerous states for final sale.
10 Annex FTA and world merchandise trade data, by state (export and import values are expressed in billions of U.S. dollars) State FTA exp World exp FTA exp as % of world exp FTA imp World imp FTA imp as % of world imp Alabama $ 6.08 $ % $ 3.39 $ % Alaska $ 0.80 $ % $ 0.59 $ % Arizona $ 9.29 $ % $ 8.33 $ % Arkansas $ 2.68 $ % $ 2.06 $ % California $ $ % $ $ % Colorado $ 2.74 $ % $ 5.01 $ % Connecticut $ 4.02 $ % $ 9.38 $ % D.C. Washington $ 0.21 $ % $ 0.10 $ % Delaware $ 1.97 $ % $ 1.27 $ % Florida $ $ % $ $ % Georgia $ $ % $ $ % Hawaii $ 0.36 $ % $ 0.21 $ % Idaho $ 2.58 $ % $ 2.35 $ % Illinois $ $ % $ $ % Indiana $ $ % $ $ % Iowa $ 7.13 $ % $ 4.57 $ % Kansas $ 5.16 $ % $ 2.70 $ % Kentucky $ 9.61 $ % $ 8.11 $ % Louisiana $ $ % $ $ % Maine $ 1.32 $ % $ 2.25 $ % Maryland $ 2.86 $ % $ 5.03 $ % Massachusetts $ 6.87 $ % $ $ % Michigan $ $ % $ $ % Minnesota $ 8.45 $ % $ $ % Mississippi $ 4.62 $ % $ 6.80 $ % Missouri $ 6.77 $ % $ 6.44 $ % Montana $ 0.79 $ % $ 5.30 $ %
11 Annex 1, continued State FTA exp World exp FTA exp as % of world exp FTA imp World imp FTA imp as % of world imp Nebraska $ 4.28 $ % $ 1.15 $ % Nevada $ 2.02 $ % $ 1.70 $ % New Hampshire $ 1.84 $ % $ 8.72 $ % New Jersey $ $ % $ $ % New Mexico $ 1.34 $ % $ 0.89 $ % New York $ $ % $ $ % North Carolina $ $ % $ $ % North Dakota $ 2.56 $ % $ 2.68 $ % Ohio $ $ % $ $ % Oklahoma $ 3.06 $ % $ 6.77 $ % Oregon $ 4.63 $ % $ 4.57 $ % Pennsylvania $ $ % $ $ % Puerto Rico $ 2.92 $ % $ 5.61 $ % Rhode Island $ 1.00 $ % $ 2.15 $ % South Carolina $ 7.59 $ % $ 6.35 $ % South Dakota $ 0.98 $ % $ 0.48 $ % Tennessee $ $ % $ $ % Texas $ $ % $ $ % Utah $ 3.24 $ % $ 7.72 $ % Vermont $ 2.11 $ % $ 3.11 $ % Virgin Islands $ 0.40 $ % $ 0.27 $ % Virginia $ 5.79 $ % $ 4.59 $ % Washington $ $ % $ $ % West Virginia $ 2.00 $ % $ 1.68 $ % Wisconsin $ $ % $ 8.01 $ % Wyoming $ 0.58 $ % $ 1.72 $ % Total $/ Avg. % $ $ 1, % $ $ 2, % Data Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division
12 Annex 2 By state, percent of 2011 U.S. FTA merchandise exports to individual FTA countries (export values are expressed in billions of U.S. dollars) State 2011 FTA exports (in billions of U.S. $) Australia Bahrain Canada Chile Costa Rica Dominican Republic Alabama $ Alaska $ Arizona $ Arkansas $ California $ Colorado $ Connecticut $ D.C. Washington $ Delaware $ Florida $ Georgia $ Hawaii $ Idaho $ Illinois $ Indiana $ Iowa $ Kansas $ Kentucky $ Louisiana $ Maine $ Maryland $ Massachusetts $ Michigan $ Minnesota $ Mississippi $ Missouri $ Montana $ El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Israel Jordan Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Oman Peru Singapore
13 Annex 2, continued State 2011 FTA exports (in billions of U.S. $) Australia Bahrain Canada Chile Costa Rica Dominican Republic Nebraska $ Nevada $ New Hampshire $ New Jersey $ New Mexico $ New York $ North Carolina $ North Dakota $ Ohio $ Oklahoma $ Oregon $ Pennsylvania $ Puerto Rico $ Rhode Island $ South Carolina $ South Dakota $ Tennessee $ Texas $ Utah $ Vermont $ Virgin Islands $ Virginia $ Washington $ West Virginia $ Wisconsin $ Wyoming $ Total $/Avg. % $ Data Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division. El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Israel Jordan Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Oman Peru Singapore
14 Annex 3 By state, percent of 2011 U.S. FTA merchandise imports from individual FTA countries (import values are expressed in billions of U.S. dollars) State 2011 FTA imports (in billions of U.S. $) Australia Bahrain Canada Chile Costa Rica Dominican Republic Alabama $ Alaska $ Arizona $ Arkansas $ California $ Colorado $ Connecticut $ D.C. Washington $ Delaware $ Florida $ Georgia $ Hawaii $ Idaho $ Illinois $ Indiana $ Iowa $ Kansas $ Kentucky $ Louisiana $ Maine $ Maryland $ Massachusetts $ Michigan $ Minnesota $ Mississippi $ Missouri $ Montana $ El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Israel Jordan Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Oman Peru Singapore
15 Annex 3, continued State 2011 FTA imports (in billions of U.S. $) Australia Bahrain Canada Chile Costa Rica Dominican Republic Nebraska $ Nevada $ New Hampshire $ New Jersey $ New Mexico $ New York $ North Carolina $ North Dakota $ Ohio $ Oklahoma $ Oregon $ Pennsylvania $ Puerto Rico $ Rhode Island $ South Carolina $ South Dakota $ Tennessee $ Texas $ Utah $ Vermont $ Virgin Islands $ Virginia $ Washington $ West Virginia $ Wisconsin $ Wyoming $ Total $/Avg. $ $ Data Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Division. El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Israel Jordan Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Oman Peru Singapore
16 Office of Trade Policy Analysis The Office of Trade Policy Analysis (OTPA) serves as the International Trade Administration s principal advisor on trade policy issues affecting the competitive position of multiple U.S. industries and also represents the Manufacturing and Services division in key international trade negotiations and policy initiatives. U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D.C
Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution
Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Mode Alabama Percent of Teachers FY Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile
More informationThree-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access
Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana
More informationChex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:
Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Security Freeze Table AA, AP and AE Military addresses*
More informationImpacts of Sequestration on the States
Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds
More informationNON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST
NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST ** Utilize this list to determine whether or not a non-resident applicant may waive the Oklahoma examination or become licensed
More informationWorkers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability
ALABAMA Alabama State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Alabama 1-2 Weeks ALASKA ARIZONA Arizona State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Arizona 7-8 Weeks by mail By Mail ARKANSAS
More informationBUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Small Business Ownership Description Total number of employer firms and self-employment in the state per 100 people in the labor force, 2003. Explanation Business ownership
More informationMAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)
HAWAII () IDAHO () Illinois () MAINE () Maryland () MASSACHUSETTS () NEBRASKA () NEVADA (Carson ) NEW HAMPSHIRE () OHIO () OKLAHOMA ( ) OREGON () TEXAS () UTAH ( ) VERMONT () ALABAMA () COLORADO () INDIANA
More informationLicensure Resources by State
Licensure Resources by State Alabama Alabama State Board of Social Work Examiners http://socialwork.alabama.gov/ Alaska Alaska Board of Social Work Examiners http://commerce.state.ak.us/dnn/cbpl/professionallicensing/socialworkexaminers.as
More informationReal Progress in Food Code Adoption
Real Progress in Food Code Adoption The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food Code adoptions by
More informationAmerican C.E. Requirements
American C.E. Requirements Alaska Board of Nursing Two of the following: 30 contact hours 30 hours of professional nursing activities 320 hours of nursing employment Arizona State Board of Nursing Arkansas
More informationEnglishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.
Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Search Term Position 1 Accent Reduction Programs in USA 1 2 American English for Business Students 1 3 American English for Graduate Students
More information2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION
BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2014 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end
More informationState-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Effective 10/16/11: Producers holding a life line of authority on or before 10/16/11 who sell or wish to sell
More informationNAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State
Select a state below to display the current regulation and requirements, or continue to scroll down. Light grey text signifies states that have not adopted an annuity training program. Alabama Illinois
More information********************
THE SURETY & FIDELITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1101 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D. C. 20036 Phone: (202) 463-0600 Fax: (202) 463-0606 Web page: www.surety.org APPLICATION Application
More informationSTATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Annuity Training Requirement Currently Effective Initial 8-Hour Annuity Training Requirement:
More informationNet-Temps Job Distribution Network
Net-Temps Job Distribution Network The Net-Temps Job Distribution Network is a group of 25,000 employment-related websites with a local, regional, national, industry and niche focus. Net-Temps customers'
More informationHigh Risk Health Pools and Plans by State
High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State State Program Contact Alabama Alabama Health 1-866-833-3375 Insurance Plan 1-334-263-8311 http://www.alseib.org/healthinsurance/ahip/ Alaska Alaska Comprehensive
More informationSchedule B DS1 & DS3 Service
Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service SCHEDULE B Private Line Data Services DS1 & DS3 Service... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, New Jersey... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, Out-of-State...
More informationState Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11
Alabama Alaska Ai Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Initial 8 Hour Annuity Training Requirement: Prior to selling annuities in California,
More informationState Tax Information
State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither
More informationReal Progress in Food Code Adoption
Real Progress in Food Code Adoption August 27, 2013 The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food
More informationState Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011
State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 Alabama http://alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/agr/mcword10agr9.pdf Alabama Pest Control Alaska http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20aac%2090.pdf
More informationNOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY This notice provides a brief summary of the [STATE] Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association (the Association) and the protection it provides for policyholders. This
More informationList of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds
List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds On November 26, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-297,
More informationSECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit
SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
More informationState Tax Information
State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither
More informationThe Obama Administration and Community Health Centers
The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers Community health centers are a critical source of health care for millions of Americans particularly those in underserved communities. Thanks primarily
More informationData show key role for community colleges in 4-year
Page 1 of 7 (https://www.insidehighered.com) Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year degree production Submitted by Doug Lederman on September 10, 2012-3:00am The notion that community colleges
More informationSTATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF
District of Columbia STATE DATA CENTER MONTHLY BRIEF N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 District Residents Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2010 By Minwuyelet Azimeraw Joy Phillips, Ph.D. This report is based on data
More informationA/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor
A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Jurisdiction 1 - American Samoa, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada and Northern Mariana Islands Total Number of Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries: 3,141,183 (as of Total Number of Beneficiaries
More informationSTATISTICAL BRIEF #273
STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 December 29 Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 28 Beth Levin Crimmel, M.S. Introduction Employees of state and
More informationEMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2011
A State-by-State Look at the President s Payroll Tax Cuts for Middle-Class Families An Analysis by the U.S. Department of the Treasury s Office of Tax Policy The President signed into law a 2 percentage
More information$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants
School Readiness: High-Quality Early Learning Head Start $10.5 $9.5 $10.1 +$1.5 +17.7% $8.5 $7.5 +$2.1 +27.0% $6.5 for fiscal year 2010 Included in the budget is $1.078 billion to ensure that every Head
More informationSECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.
SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the agencies)
More informationGOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES
GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES BY KEITH HALL AND ROBERT GREENE November 25, 2013 www.mercatus.org 0.7 2.4 4.2 FEDERAL CONTRACT FUNDED PRIVATE-SECTOR JOBS AS
More informationPUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION
PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION Background After concerns were raised about the level of compensation being paid to some public housing authority (PHA) leaders, in August 2011 HUD reached out to
More informationCensus Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009
March of Dimes Foundation Office of Government Affairs 1146 19 th Street, NW, 6 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone (202) 659-1800 Fax (202) 296-2964 marchofdimes.com nacersano.org Census Data on Uninsured
More informationExploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide
Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Overview of AHA RACTrac Survey Results, 4 th Quarter 2010 For complete report go to: http://www.aha.org/aha/issues/rac/ractrac.html Agenda
More informationQuestion for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota
Topic: Question by: : Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota Date: March 18, 2012 Manitoba Corporations
More informationIn-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1
In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1 $18,464 New New Hampshire 2 Hampshire $16,552 3 Vermont
More informationNAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State
NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by Specific Alabama Alaska 10/16/2011 TBD Arizona Arkansas If you obtained a life insurance license prior to 10/16/11, you must complete the NAIC course by 4/16/12.
More informationWe do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.
Topic: LLC Managers/Members Question by: Jeff Harvey : Idaho Date: March 7, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Arizona requires that member-managed LLCs
More information14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013
14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013 (millions) deduction in state dollars) claimed (dollars) taxes paid [1] state AGI United States 44.2 100.0 30.2 507.7 100.0 11,483 100.0
More informationState Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006
State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006 State Federal Income Tax State General Sales Tax State Personal Property Tax Interest Expenses Medical Expenses Charitable Contributions
More informationSubject: Military Personnel Strengths in the Army National Guard
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 March 20, 2002 The Honorable John McHugh Chairman The Honorable Vic Snyder Ranking Member Military Personnel Subcommittee Committee on Armed
More informationNAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State
NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by Specific Alabama Alaska 10/16/2011 TBD Arizona Arkansas If you obtained a life insurance license prior to 10/16/11, you must complete the NAIC course by 4/16/12.
More informationState by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement
State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement THE FOLLOWING ARE ONLY GENERAL SUMMARIES OF THE PRACTICE ACTS EACH STATE HAS REGARDING CONSERVATIVE SHARP DEBRIDEMENT
More informationUse of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, 2015. [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]
Topic: Question by: : Use of "Mail Box" service Kathy M. Sachs Kansas Date: April 6, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District
More information(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA
(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES Full Medical Benefits** Alabama Indiana Nebraska South Carolina Alaska Iowa Nevada South Dakota
More informationLow-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, 2013. [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]
Topic: Question by: : Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Kevin Rayburn, Esq., MBA Tennessee Date: July 29, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado
More informationI have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans
Topic: Question by: : Disaster Recovery Plan Scott W. Anderson Nevada Date: November 19, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District
More informationUS Exports to China by State
US Exports to China by State 2004 2013 1818 N Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036 Tel: 202-429-0340 Fax: 202-775-2476 E-mail: info@uschina.org www.uschina.org Executive Summary Exports to China:
More informationCurrent State Regulations
Current State Regulations Alabama: Enacted in 1996, the state of Alabama requires all licensed massage therapists to * A minimum of 650 classroom hours at an accredited school approved by the state of
More informationStates Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)
States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon) Sales Tax Applied 1 Wyoming $0.02 4% 2 4 8 10 Missouri $0.06 4.225% Wisconsin $0.06 5% Colorado $0.08 2.9%
More informationRecruitment and Retention Resources By State List
Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List Alabama $5,000 rural physician tax credit o http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/alcode/40/18/4a/40-18-132 o http://adph.org/ruralhealth/index.asp?id=882 Area Health
More informationTHE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY
THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY Stephen L. Bump Introduction The 2013 Health Physics Society (HPS) survey data was collected by having health physicists (HPs) submit their responses to survey questions on a
More informationAttachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based
Attachment A The following table provides information on student teaching requirements across several states. There are several models for these requirements; minimum number of weeks, number of required
More informationAcceptable Certificates from States other than New York
Alabama 2 2 Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Teacher Yes Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Support Services Yes Alaska 2 Regular Certificate, Type A 5 Years, renewable Teacher Yes At least
More informationQ1 2009 Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009
Q1 2009 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 14, 2009 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value
More informationTHE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY
THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY Gary Lauten Introduction The 2012 Health Physics Society (HPS) survey data was collected by having health physicists (HPs) submit their responses to survey questions on a webbased
More informationQuestion by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, 2012. [LLC Question] [2012-03-29]
Topic: LLC Question Question by: Karon Beyer : Florida Date: March 28, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Arizona uses "manager" or "member," but not
More informationNurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011
Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified
More informationBroadband Availability in America. With Rural Americans Looking for High-Speed Services, Adequate Broadband Speeds Remain Out of Reach for Many
Broadband Availability in America With Rural Americans Looking for High-Speed Services, Adequate Broadband Speeds Remain Out of Reach for Many Federal Communications Commission January 30, 2015 High-speed
More informationOverview of School Choice Policies
Overview of School Choice Policies Tonette Salazar, Director of State Relations Micah Wixom, Policy Analyst CSG West Education Committee July 29, 2015 Who we are The essential, indispensable member of
More informationIn Brief. Contraception Counts: Ranking State Efforts
In Brief 2006 Series, No. 1 Contraception Counts: ing Efforts Unintended pregnancy is a major public health and social problem in the United s. Of the six million pregnancies that occur among American
More informationWhat to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL
What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules Paul Swanson, MBA, CPA Instructor of Accounting John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Kevin Berry, PhD, Assistant Professor of Accounting
More informationWho May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption?
State Statutes Series Current Through February 2006 Who May Adopt, Be Adopted, or Place a Child for Adoption? In order for an adoption to take place, a person available to be adopted must be placed in
More information2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014
2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report Section 3 Billing s Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter Copyright 2015 Reproduction of this report or portions thereof without express written
More informationLPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010
Renewable Energy LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010 y Searching for various forms of renewable energy and their actual cost in Louisiana
More informationrecovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013
recovery: Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through June 2013 Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through This report projects education requirements linked to forecasted job growth by state and the
More informationChanges in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans, 2007-2008
Issue Brief November 2007 Changes in the Cost of Medicare Prescription Drug Plans, 2007-2008 BY JOSHUA LANIER AND DEAN BAKER* The average premium for Medicare Part D prescription drug plans rose by 24.5
More informationSupplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1
Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1 Supplier Business Continuity Survey A response is required for every question General Information Supplier Name: JCI Supplier Number: Supplier Facility
More informationSTATISTICAL BRIEF #435
STATISTICAL BRIEF #435 April 2014 Premiums and Employee Contributions for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance: Private versus Public Sector, 2012 Karen E. Davis, MA Introduction Employer-sponsored health
More informationMedicare Advantage Plan Landscape Data Summary
2013 Medicare Advantage Plan Landscape Data Summary Table of Contents Report Overview...3 Medicare Advantage Costs and Benefits...4 The Maximum Out of Pocket (MOOP) Benefit How It Works...4 The Prescription
More informationLLC Domestications. Date: March 23, 2015. [LLC Domestication] [March 23, 2015]
Topic: Question by: : LLC Domestications Earl B. Weaver, Jr. Illinois Date: March 23, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Alabama has removed the term domestication from our Code for
More informationPrepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA 92173 (619)
Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA 92173 (619) 662-7342 Social Security Facts: The Social Security act was
More informationADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD
ASPE Issue BRIEF ADDENDUM TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACE SUMMARY ENROLLMENT REPORT FOR THE INITIAL ANNUAL OPEN ENROLLMENT PERIOD For the period: October 1, 2013 March 31, 2014 (Including Additional
More information2009-10 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS. By Jacek Cianciara
2009-10 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS By Jacek Cianciara Wisconsin Department of Revenue Division of Research and Policy December 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Findings 3 Introduction
More informationNurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014
Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified
More informationREPORT OF FINDINGS NURSING FACILITY STAFFING SURVEY 2010
REPORT OF FINDINGS NURSING FACILITY STAFFING SURVEY 2010 October, 2011 ABSTRACT Approximately 2 million workers were employed at nursing facilities across the United States in 2010. 1.3 million nursing
More informationModel Regulation Service January 2006 DISCLOSURE FOR SMALL FACE AMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES MODEL ACT
Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Model Regulation Service January 2006 Purpose Definition Exemptions Disclosure Requirements Insurer Duties
More informationHECM MIC Endorsement Report WELLS FARGO BANK NA As of July 2010
WELLS FARGO BANK NA As of July 2010 Table of Contents Industry Overview... pg. 3 Top 10 Lenders... pg. 3 Regional Overview... pg. 3 National Lender Stats... National Top 10... pg. 4 pg. 5 Regional Top
More informationConnecticut s Insurance Industry: Economic Impacts & Contributions
Connecticut s Insurance Industry: Economic Impacts & Contributions Prepared by: Connecticut Economic Resource Center, Inc. December 2006 2006 Insure Connecticut s Future, Connecticut Insurance and Financial
More informationHealth Care Costs from Opioid Abuse: A State-by-State Analysis
Health Care Costs from Opioid Abuse: A State-by-State Analysis M AT R I X G L O B A L A D V I S O R S, L L C April 0 The Centers for Disease Control has called prescription painkiller abuse an epidemic.
More informationIRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010
Topic: IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds Jurisdiction: Colorado/NASS Date: 5 August 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Have you spoken
More informationModel Regulation Service July 2005 LIFE INSURANCE MULTIPLE POLICY MODEL REGULATION
Table of Contents Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 1. Model Regulation Service July 2005 Purpose Authority Exemptions Duties of Insurers Severability Effective
More informationJuly 2012 (1) States With Negative Growth 22 States With Positive Growth 25
Respondent Coverage: 100% July 2012 Current Month Current Month New England 9.5% Connecticut -3.3% Maine 3.6% Massachusetts 24.1% New Hampshire -0.1% Rhode Island 13.3% Vermont -0.3% Middle Atlantic -3.5%
More informationLLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin. Jurisdiction. Date: 01 March 2011. LLC Member/Manager Disclosure 2011 March 01
Topic: LLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin : Maine Date: 01 March 2011 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Our statement of information (aka annual
More informationPlease contact test@test.com if you have any questions regarding this survey.
1. Which of the following best describes your position within the company? - CEO/owner - Partner/senior executive - Professional (consultant, legal, medical, architect) - Finance/accounting/purchasing
More informationImpact of the House Full-Year Continuing Resolution for FY 2011 (H.R. 1)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISCRETIONARY PROGRAMS Impact of the House Full-Year Continuing Resolution for (H.R. 1) Students Impacted* Job Losses Elementary & Secondary Education Programs Grants to Local
More informationIT Spending Comparison. Date: February 28, 2013. [IT Spending Comparison] [February 28, 2013]
Topic: Question by: : IT Spending Comparison Jenny Acker Wisconsin Date: February 28, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District
More informationFacing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value
w Reports: Health Insurance Marketplace Exchange Enrollment Satisfaction Improves Significantly in Second Year Facing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value WESTLAKE VILLAGE,
More informationThe Economic Impact of Local Parks
The Economic Impact of Local Parks An Examination of the Economic Impacts of Operations and Capital Spending on the United States Economy Executive Summary National Recreation and Park Association 1 Table
More informationU.S. Trading Companies, 2012
U.S. Trading Companies, 2012 Natalie Soroka Trade and Economic Analysis Industry and Analysis Department of Commerce International Trade Administration November 2014 U.S. Trading Companies: 2012 Highlights
More informationThe Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012)
The Economic Contributions of U.S. Mining (2012) September 2014 A report prepared by the National Mining Association TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary...E-1 National Results...E-1 State Results...E-1
More informationCompulsory Auto Insurance and Financial Responsibility Laws State Reporting Programs
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES EMPLOYMENT AND INSURANCE PROGRAM Compulsory Auto Insurance and Laws State Reporting Programs 1 Alabama 32-7-6 32-7A-6 2000 32-7A-7 32-7A-7 Alaska 28.20 28.22.011
More informationFull Medical Benefits**
(In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES Full Medical Benefits** Alabama Indiana Nebraska South Carolina Alaska Iowa Nevada South Dakota
More information