Supreme Court of Florida
|
|
|
- Christal Ramsey
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-73 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION PER CURIAM. [April 4, 2013] Before the Court are proposed out-of-cycle amendments to recently adopted Florida Rule of Judicial Administration (Service of Pleadings and Documents), which requires service of pleadings and documents between parties. 1 See Fla. Rule Jud. Admin (e). The amendments are proposed by The Florida Bar s Rules of Judicial Administration Committee (Committee) in response to inquiries received by the Committee, The Florida Bar, and the Clerk of 1. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro., Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., Fla. Probate Rules, Fla. Rules of Traffic Court, Fla. Small Claims Rules, Fla. Rules of Juv. Pro., Fla. Rules of App. Pro., and Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro. Service Rule, 102 So. 3d 505, 509 (Fla. 2012) (adopting new rule and conforming amendments to other bodies of rules).
2 this Court concerning the implementation and interpretation of the new rule. 2 We have jurisdiction 3 and adopt all the Committee s proposals, except the proposal to change the word , as used throughout the rule, to . After considering the proposals, we amend rule as follows. Subdivisions (b)(1) (Service by Electronic Mail ( )) and (b)(1)(b) (Exception to Service on Attorneys) are amended to allow parties to stipulate to methods of service other than . Subdivision (b)(1)(a) (Service on Attorneys) is amended to clarify that an attorney need not file a separate designation of address. Subdivision (b)(1)(d) (Time of Service) is amended to clarify when service is complete. Subdivision (b)(2) (Service by Other Means) is amended to clarify that if more than one method of service is used, the computation of time is based on the method of service that provides the shortest response time. Finally, we adopt the proposed stylistic changes, other than the proposal to change the word to throughout the rule The Board of Governors of the Florida Bar approved the proposals by a vote of See art. V, 2(a), Fla. Const. 4. See The Gregg Reference Manual 847(g) (11th ed. 2011) (noting that the hyphenated form of the word is the one most commonly used and in order to maintain a consistent style, it is better to retain the hyphen in until many other e words drop the hyphen as well). Consistent with the reference to in rule 2.516, numerous other rules of court and forms have been amended to reference . See, e.g., Fla. Rules Jud. Admin (b) (Computing and - 2 -
3 Accordingly, Florida Rule of Judicial Administration is amended as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion. Because the amendments were not published for comment prior to their adoption, 5 interested persons shall have sixty days from the date of this opinion in which to file comments with the Court. 6 Extending Time; Additional Time after Service by Mail or )), (Electronic Filing); Fla. R. Crim. P (Additional Time after Service by Mail, when Permitted, or ); Fla. Prob. R (d) (Time; Additional Time after Service by Mail or ); Fla. Fam. Law R. P. Form (b); Fla. Sup. Ct. Appr. Fam. Law Form The Committee does not propose changing those references. 5. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro., Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., Fla. Probate Rules, Fla. Rules of Traffic Court, Fla. Small Claims Rules, Fla. Rules of Juv. Pro., Fla. Rules of App. Pro., and Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro. Service Rule & In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro., Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro., Fla. Probate Rules, Fla. Small Claims Rules, Fla. Rules of Juv. Pro., Fla. Rules of App. Pro., & Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro. Electronic Filing, Nos. SC & SC (Fla. order filed Oct. 9, 2012) (providing for fast-track consideration of proposed amendments to new service and e-filing rules). 6. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before June 3, 2013, with a certificate of service verifying that a copy has been served on the Committee Chair, Alexandra V. Rieman, Broward County Courthouse, 201 S.E. 6th Street, Suite 880, Fort Lauderdale, Florida , [email protected], and on the Bar Staff Liaison to the Committee, Jodi Jennings, 651 E. Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida , [email protected], as well as a separate request for oral argument if the person filing the comment wishes to participate in oral argument, which may be scheduled - 3 -
4 It is so ordered. POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS. Original Proceeding Florida Rule of Judicial Administration Alexandra V. Rieman, Chair, Judicial Administration Committee, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Jodi Jennings, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner in this case. The Committee Chair has until June 24, 2013, to file a response to any comments filed with the Court. If filed by an attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must be electronically filed via the Portal in accordance with In re: Electronic Filing in the Supreme Court of Florida via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC13-7 (Feb 18, 2013). If filed by a non-lawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in Florida, the comment must be electronically filed via in accordance with In re Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC04-84 (Sept. 13, 2004). Electronically filed documents must be submitted in Microsoft Word 97 or higher. Any person unable to submit a comment electronically must mail or handdeliver the originally signed comment to the Florida Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida ; no additional copies are required or will be accepted
5 APPENDIX RULE SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS (a) (b) Ser vice; H ow M ade. When service is required or permitted to be made upon a party represented by an attorney, service must be made upon the attorney unless service upon the party is ordered by the court. (1) Ser vice by E lectr onic M ail ( ). All documents required or permitted to be served on another party must be served by , unless the parties otherwise stipulate or this rule otherwise provides. When, in addition to service by , the sender also utilizes another means of service provided for in subdivision (b)(2), any differing time limits and other provisions applicable to that other means of service control. (A) Ser vice on A ttor neys. Upon appearing in a proceeding, an attorney must serve a designation ofdesignate a primary address and may designate no more than two secondary addresses. Thereafter, service must be directed to all designated addresses in that proceeding. Every document filed by an attorney thereafter must include the primary address of that attorney and any secondary addresses. If an attorney does not designate any address for service, documents may be served on that attorney at the address on record with The Florida Bar. (B) E xception to E -mail Ser vice on A ttor neys. Service by an attorney on another attorney must be made by unless excused by the court. Upon motion by an attorney demonstrating that the attorney has no account and lacks access to the Internet at the attorney s office, the court may excuse the attorney from the requirements of service. Service on and by an attorney excused by the court from service must be by the means provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this rule. the date it is sent. (C) (D) T ime of Ser vice. Service by is complete whenon (i) An is deemed served on the date it is sent
6 (ii) If the sender learns that the did not reach the address of the person to be served, the sender must immediately send another copy by , or by a means authorized by subdivision (b)(2) of this rule. computation of time. (iii) service is treated as service by mail for the (E ) F or mat of E -mail for Ser vice. Service of a document by is made by an sent to all addresses designated by the attorney or party with either (a) a copy of the document in PDF format attached or (b) a link to the document on a website maintained by a clerk. (i) (ii) [No Change] (iii) Any document served by may be signed by any of the /s/, /s, or s/ formats, as long as the filed originaldocument is signed in accordance with the applicable rule of procedure. (iv) [No Change] (2) Ser vice by O ther M eans. In addition to, and not in lieu of, service by , service may also be made upon attorneys by any of the means specified in this subdivision (b)(2). If a document is served by more than one method of service, the computation of time for any response to the served document shall be based on the method of service that provides the shortest response time. Service on and by all parties who are not represented by an attorney and who do not designate an address, and on and by all attorneys excused from service, must be made by delivering a copy of the document or by mailing it to the party or attorney at their last known address or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court. Service by mail is complete upon mailing. Delivery of a copy within this rule is complete upon: (A) (F) [No Change] (c) (d) F iling. All original documents must be filed with the court either before service or immediately thereafter, unless otherwise provided for by general law or other rules. If the original of any bond or other document required to be an original is not placed in the court file or deposited with the clerk, a certified copy must be so placed by the clerk
7 (e) (h) - 7 -
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-2295 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.852. PER CURIAM. [April 24, 2014] The Court, on its own motion, amends Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-30 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES. [September 26, 2013] PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida
How To Change A Court Order To Allow A Mentally Ill Person To Represent Himself Or Herself
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC08-2163 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.111. LABARGA, J. [August 27, 2009] This matter is before the Court for consideration sua sponte of amendments
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-2066 PER CURIAM. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. [December 12, 2013] In response to 2013 legislation, the Florida Bar s Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-1542 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY. PER CURIAM. [July 5, 2012] The Florida Bar s Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee)
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC11-2500 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. EUGENE KEITH POLK, Respondent. [November 14, 2013] We have for review a referee s report recommending that Respondent
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-74 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. [November 14, 2013] PER CURIAM. We have for consideration the regular-cycle report of proposed rule amendments
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, THE FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO AND PINELLAS COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2013-017 PA-CIR RE: E-FILING IN COUNTY CIVIL, COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS, CIRCUIT CIVIL,
No. 70,482. [June 18, 19871
No. 70,482 THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR - 6-8.3, 6-8.5, and 6-11 (DESIGNATION AND CERTIFICATION) [June 18, 19871 PER CURIAM. The Florida Bar petitions this Court, pursuant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL CASE NO. SC11-399 PROCEDURE, FLORIDA PROBATE
NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2012-03 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ESTABLISHING NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT CIRCUIT
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida POLSTON, J. No. SC14-1282 VICKI THOMAS, et al., Appellants, vs. CLEAN ENERGY COASTAL CORRIDOR, etc., et al., Appellees. [October 1, 2015] This case is before the Court on appeal
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. AOSC13-48 IN RE: ELECTRONIC FILING OF CRIMINAL CASES IN THE TRIAL COURTS OF FLORIDA VIA THE FLORIDA COURTS E-FILING PORTAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER The Florida Supreme Court's
No. 76,408. [February 13, 19921. Hans C. Feige petitions this Court to review the. referee's findings and recommendations in the instant bar
No. 76,408 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. HANS C. FEIGE, Re s porident. [February 13, 19921 PER CURIAM. Hans C. Feige petitions this Court to review the referee's findings and recommendations in the
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-133 CANADY, J. JEFFREY H. ATWATER, Appellant, vs. FREDERICK W. KORTUM, Appellee. [July 5, 2012] This case concerns a statutory regulation affecting public insurance adjusters,
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC09-1460 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. No. SC09-1579 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - FORM 1.996 (FINAL JUDGMENT OF
The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.
Law Offices of JULIANNE M. HOLT Public Defender Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida 700 East Twiggs Street, Fifth Floor P.O. Box 172910 Tampa, Florida 33672-0910 RE: Pro se Motion to Withdraw Capias
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC11-1679 IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. [December 5, 2013] CORRECTED OPINION PER CURIAM. Consistent
Proposed Amendments To Rules of Practice and Procedures-General Division Court of Common Pleas. 7.02 Civil Cases
Proposed Amendments To Rules of Practice and Procedures-General Division Court of Common Pleas 7.02 Civil Cases There shall be, for case administrative purposes within the Common Pleas Court-General Division,
SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA
BOB DILLINGER PUBLIC DEFENDER SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA www.wearethehope.org RE: Motion to Modify or Terminate Probation or Community Control Please find attached a sample format to be used in
2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:
2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2011AP778-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant,
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96413 KPMG PEAT MARWICK, etc., Petitioner, vs. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, etc., Respondent. WELLS, C.J. [July 13, 2000] CORRECTED
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC04-1461 CANTERO, J. STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SEAN E. CREGAN, Respondent. [July 7, 2005] We must decide whether a court may grant jail-time credit for time spent
HONORABLE JUDGE MARK I. SHAMES Section 4 Probate Division. Practice Preferences
HONORABLE JUDGE MARK I. SHAMES Section 4 Probate Division 545 First Avenue North, Room 312 St. Petersburg, Florida 727-582-7734 (Phone) 727-582-7409 (Fax) Practice Preferences (Revised November, 2015)
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas) The Basics 1. Court's Address: Court of Appeals, Fifth District, 600 Commerce Street, Suite 200, Dallas, Texas, 75202-4658 2. Telephone number: 214-712-3400 (main)
Index to Petition No. 13-7280 for writ of certiorari U.S. Supreme Court
Index to Petition No. 13-7280 for writ of certiorari U.S. Supreme Court Petitioner pro se, nonlawyer, in forma pauperis, Neil Gillespie, 8092 SW 115th Loop, Ocala Florida 34481, telephone 352-854-7807,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(f) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENTS OF RAQUEL A. RODRIGUEZ, GENERAL COUNSEL TO GOVERNOR JEB BUSH, IN
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC96239 RAYMOND O. DIXON, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, vs. GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and BIO LAB INC., Respondents, Cross-Petitioners. WELLS, C.J. [August 24, 2000] We have
Public Remaining Disciplinary Under Bankruptcy Law
No. 74,764 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. T. MICHAEL PRICE, Respondent. [November 8, 19901 PER CURIAM. A referee recommended that this Court privately reprimand the respondent, T. Michael Price, a member
When should these forms be used?
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE FORMS 12.920(a) MOTION FOR REFERRAL TO GENERAL MAGISTRATE 12.920(b) ORDER OF REFERRAL TO GENERAL MAGISTRATE and 12.920(c) NOTICE OF HEARING BEFORE
supreme court of floriba
supreme court of floriba No. 83,351 THE FLORIDA BAR, C omp 1 a i nan t, VS. AMY LEE BURKICH ~ BURRELL, Respondent. [September 7, 19951 PER CURIAM. We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and
CASE NO. 1D09-0765. Rhonda B. Boggess of Taylor, Day, Currie, Boyd & Johnson, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ATHENA F. GRAINGER, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF SAMUEL GUS FELOS, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION
INDIGENT DEFENSE (Extracted from the Local Rules of the Superior Court)
INDIGENT DEFENSE (Extracted from the Local Rules of the Superior Court) MR 1.1. Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Defendants. NOTE: These rules were adopted by the Judicial Council in 1981 and published
No. 76,468. [May 28, 19921
No. 76,468 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. JEROME L. TEPPS, Respondent. [May 28, 19921 PER CURIAM. Jerome L. Tepps, a member of The Florida Bar, seeks review of a referee's report f indiny him guilty
in toto, the Proposed Rule.
r h IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - RULE 3.853 (DNA TESTING) CASE NO.: SCO1-363 COMMENTS OF FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS (FACDL)
advisory opinion on the foll.owing question : [December 24, 19921 PEH CURIAM. Florida Bar, Ira C. Hatch, on behalf of American Family Living
Nci. 78,358 TilE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION - NONLAWYER PREPARATION OF LIVING TRUST S [December 24, 19921 PEH CURIAM. Pursuant to rule 10-7.l(b) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, Ira C. Hatch,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. PALM BEACH COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, Petitioner, v. KATHERINE HARRIS, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and ROBERT A. BUTTERWORTH, as Attorney General
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) GENERAL ORDER No. 10-07 ORDER AUTHORIZING ) ELECTRONIC FILING ) (Supersedes General Order ) Nos. 08-02 and 08-11) ) Table
Statewide Portal Electronic Filing. Christin Gallardo, Esq.
Statewide Portal Electronic Filing Christin Gallardo, Esq. Housekeeping All points of contact mentioned are summarized at the end of the presentation. All internet links/online resources mentioned are
Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Orange County Circuit Civil Division 39 Judge John Marshall Kest
Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Orange County Circuit Civil Division 39 Judge John Marshall Kest **NOTE: REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 6/17/13** IN ORDER TO ASSIST COUNSEL AND THE LITIGANTS,
ORANGE COUNTY, et al.,
_1 No. 80,685 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner, vs. ORANGE COUNTY, et al., Respondents. [June 17, 19931 KOGAN, J. We have for review Orange County v. Florida Departmei?'; -- :IE - Revenue, 605
NOTICE OF APPEAL., Defendant/Appellant appeals to the Fourth. District Court of Appeal the judgment and sentence entered by the Honorable,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY. CRIMINAL DIVISION: CASE NO: Plaintiff/Appellee, Defendant/Appellant / NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTICE IS GIVEN that,
(3) Electronic Filing (e-file) means the electronic transmission of documents to the Court, and from the Court, for the purposes of filing.
STATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY'S LOCAL E-FILING RULES 1-101 Short Title These rules may be cited as e-filing rules. 1-102 Definitions The following terms in this Rule shall be defined as follows: (1) Electronic
This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court
NO. 80,377 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. LEWIS R. PEARCE, Respondent. [February 10, 19941 PER CURIAM. This attorney-discipline proceeding is before the Court on petition of The Florida Bar. In its
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT GUIDE TO ELECTRONIC FILING. Introduction. Participation in the ECF System
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT GUIDE TO ELECTRONIC FILING Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit requires attorneys to file documents electronically, subject to exceptions set forth
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1150
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1150 In Re: Petition to Amend Rule Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) of the Rules of Professional Conduct / as follows: RESPONSE OF HARRY A. SHEVIN, ESQUIRE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Order Number 2009-12-Civ
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Order Number 2009-12-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ESTABLISHING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FORECLOSURE PROCEDURES (a) Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida Case No. SC05-1150 In Re Petition to Amend Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) of the Rules of Professional Conduct./ COMMENTS OF ATTORNEY STEVEN W. WINGO AND
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Colonial Manor West Apartments Condominium
JUSTICE LINDA S. JAMIESON COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULES
JUSTICE LINDA S. JAMIESON COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULES Supreme Court of the State of New York Westchester County Courthouse 111 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard White Plains, New York 10601 Courtroom
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2015 WI 71 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: & In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jordan E. Gall, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Jordan
How To efile Criminal Pleadings/Documents:
How To efile Criminal Pleadings/Documents: Log onto the eportal at www.myflcourtaccess.com o If you do not have an account, please click the register now link o Choose the applicable filer role that relates
How To Get The Court To Set Out A Rule On The Cost Of A Medical Malpractice Claim
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENT OF GLENN KLAUSMAN, ESQ., TO PETITION The undersigned attorney
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 4.06 BAIL BOND ACTIONS
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 4.06 BAIL BOND ACTIONS In order to provide guidelines concerning bond forfeitures in accordance with Chapter 903, Florida Statutes, IT IS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term. No. 12-0005. LAWYER DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Petitioner. JOHN P. SULLIVAN, Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term No. 12-0005 FILED January 17, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA LAWYER DISCIPLINARY
The Public Defender cannot file these motions for you or represent you in your hearing unless the Court appoints us to do so.
Law Offices of JULIANNE M. HOLT Public Defender Thirteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida 700 East Twiggs Street, Fifth Floor P.O. Box 172910 Tampa, Florida 33672-0910 RE: Pro se Motion to Modify (Change)
WYOMING SUPREME COURT ELECTRONIC FILING ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
WYOMING SUPREME COURT ELECTRONIC FILING ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL December, 2007 Revised June, 2008 Second Revision September, 2010 Third Revision April, 2015 Table of Contents. 1.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. On Review from the Second District Court of Appeal, Case
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-889 THE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION ACTIVITIES OF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGERS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-889 THE FLORIDA BAR RE: ADVISORY OPINION ACTIVITIES OF COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANAGERS ANSWER BRIEF OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE UNLICENSED PRACTICE OF
ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS, JAMIE BARDOL AND LORI BARDOL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC00-600 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 4th DISTRICT NO. 98-2918 JAMIE BARDOL AND LORI BARDOL, v. MARY MARTIN, Petitioners, Respondent. / ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150 COMMENTS OF DAN CYTRYN, ESQUIRE OF LAW OFFICES CYTRYN & SANTANA, P.A.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1150 IN RE: PETITION TO AMEND RULE 4-1.5(F)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT / COMMENTS OF DAN CYTRYN, ESQUIRE OF LAW OFFICES CYTRYN & SANTANA, P.A.
CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE Court of Appeals STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE CIVIL APPEALS DOCKETING STATEMENT INSTRUCTIONS Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 12(e) requires an appellant to file a civil appeals docketing
Misc. Docket No. f ( '9256
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. f ( '9256 FINAL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 735 AND 736 ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Section 22.004 of the Texas Government Code,
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING (ECF)
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING (ECF) March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS (A) General Inquiries... 1 (1) What is ECF?... 1 (2) Who can file via ECF?... 1 (3) Is e-filing mandatory?... 1
(Effective July 1, 2014) APPENDIX A
(Effective July 1, 2014) APPENDIX A FILING FEE SCHEDULE - DISTRICT COURT AND MAGISTRATE DIVISION COMMENCING A CIVIL ACTION A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint, petition, application, or other
In the Indiana Supreme Court
In the Indiana Supreme Court CAUSE NUMBER: 94S00-1301-MS-30 ORDER AMENDING INDIANA ADMINISTRATIVE RULES Under the authority vested in this Court to provide by rule for the procedure employed in all courts
Solomon Appeals, Mediation & Arbitration
Introduction Donna Greenspan Solomon, Esq., handles business-related appeals, mediation, and arbitration. Donna is one of only two attorneys certified by The Florida Bar as both Appellate Specialist and
In the SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE #: SC07-244 Emma Murray LT CASE #: 1D06-475
In the SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE #: SC07-244 Emma Murray LT CASE #: 1D06-475 VS. Petitioner, Mariner Health/ACE USA Respondents. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE WORKERS COMPENSATION SECTION OF THE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA IN RE THE MATTER OF ELECTRONIC ) FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS ) ADMINISTRATIVE IN PROBATE CASES ) ORDER NO. 2004-09 ) 1. Authorization
UPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL 04-03 (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services
UPL ADVISORY OPINION UPL 04-03 (December 2004) Non-lawyer In-house Employee Legal Services This is an Advisory Opinion regarding Rule 31 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona and Arizona Code of
Sharon R. Bock. CLERK i& COMPTROLLER SELF SERVICE CENTER. Your Guide Through The Courts. Packet #40. Revised-mmf'P OBLIGEE'S REQUEST TO SUSPEND
Sharon R. Bock CLERK i& COMPTROLLER SELF SERVICE CENTER Your Guide Through The Courts 1 Packet #40 Revised-mmf'P OBLIGEE'S REQUEST TO SUSPEND DRIVER'S LICENSE AND MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION NON-REFUNDABLE
USER INSTRUCTIONS WELCOME TO THE CLERK S OFFICE ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM
USER INSTRUCTIONS WELCOME TO THE CLERK S OFFICE ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM Welcome to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County s Electronic Filing System ( efiling System ). The efiling System is presently
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC02-2659 CYNTHIA CLEFF NORMAN, Petitioner, vs. TERRI LAMARRIA FARROW, Respondent. [June 24, 2004] WELLS, J. We have for review Norman v. Farrow, 832 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA
