AN END TO BEING KNOCKED OUT ON PENALTIES?
|
|
- Magdalene Wright
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BRIEFING AN END TO BEING KNOCKED OUT ON PENALTIES? NOVEMBER 2015 ON 4 NOVEMBER 2015 THE RULE AGAINST PENALTIES IN COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS CAME UNDER THE SCRUTINY OF A SEVEN JUDGE PANEL OF THE SUPREME COURT. THIS BRIEFING CONSIDERS THE SUPREME COURT S JUDGMENT IN THOSE CASES AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE LAW ON PENALTIES. The Supreme Court s decisions in Cavendish Square Holding BV (Appellant) v Talal El Makdessi (Respondent), ParkingEye Limited (Respondent) v Beavis (Appellant) 1 Freedom of contract is at the very heart of English civil law. The rationale is that parties should be free to make their own bargains and be held to them without Court interference. However, as with many closely held principles, English law s commitment to freedom of contract is not absolute. One of the more controversial exceptions is the common law rule against penalties, which may typically be engaged when a contract provides that a party in breach must pay a pre-determined sum of money to the innocent party (otherwise known as liquidated damages ) or provide some other compensation to the innocent party (for example, where a contract provides that rights will be lost or assets transferred at an undervalue). The traditional approach of the English Courts has been that, if the relevant terms of the contract are intended to be a deterrent to breach rather than a genuine preestimate of the loss that might be suffered by the innocent party upon breach, the contractual provision may be held to be unenforceable as a penalty. Since the turn of the millennium a different tack has been taken by the Courts, such that even if the liquidated damages are not a genuine pre-estimation of loss, the clause providing for them may not be penal (and therefore unenforceable) if it can 1 [2015] UKSC 67
2 2 Watson Farley & Williams be otherwise commercially justified. Examples of clauses which have been held to be enforceable because they are commercially justified include a clause charging increased interest on a defaulting loan, a clause requiring the payment of the costs of the original litigation between the parties in the event of a breach of the settlement agreement and a clause awarding the innocent party a generous measure of damages for wrongful dismissal. On 4 November 2015 the rule against penalties came under the scrutiny of a seven judge panel of the Supreme Court in a landmark judgment of two cases raising similar issues. The questions to be considered were not limited to whether the clauses in issue constituted penalties, but whether the rule against penalties should be reformed or even scrapped in its entirety. The Supreme Court s judgment in those cases, and the consequences for the law on penalties, are considered in detail below. THE TWO CASES GAVE THE SUPREME COURT THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS THE ROLE OF THE RULE AGAINST PENALTIES FIRST IN A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT OF SALE AND SECOND IN A CONSUMER CONTRACT. Cavendish and ParkingEye The two cases gave the Supreme Court the opportunity to address the role of the rule against penalties first in a commercial contract of sale and second in a consumer contract. In summary, the relevant facts were: a) In Cavendish, Mr Makdessi had sold a majority interest in his business to Cavendish. The contract of sale allocated a very large payment for goodwill but clauses 5.1 and 5.6 respectively provided that if Mr Makdessi breached contractual restrictive covenants relating to non-competition (regardless of the severity of the breach) he would no longer be entitled to around US$44 million in unpaid instalments otherwise owed to him and Cavendish could exercise an option to purchase Mr Makdessi s remaining shareholding at a price which did not apportion any value to goodwill. Mr Makdessi breached the non-competition covenants and, when Cavendish sought to rely on clauses 5.1 and 5.6, alleged that those clauses were unenforceable as penalties. The High Court found in favour of Cavendish under the commercial justification test, but the Court of Appeal found in favour of Mr Makdessi, relying more closely on the traditional rule against penalties. b) In ParkingEye, Mr Beavis had parked at a car-park which permitted free parking for a stay of up to two hours, but imposed a fine of 85 for any overstay. Mr Beavis left his car there for 2 hours and 56 minutes, was fined 85 and appealed the fine as a penalty under common law and as contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (although this note only addresses the penalty question). Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal rejected Mr Beavis case and upheld the fine. The Supreme Court held (with no dissent on this point) that the relevant clauses in both cases were not penalties and were enforceable. Further, the judges of the Supreme Court were unanimous in declining to abolish or to expressly modify the scope of the rule against penalties. Instead, the judgments were each based on what the judges supposed to be the true meaning of the previous authorities. In particular, the Court recognised that the rule has a useful role in protecting parties against oppressive bargains, particularly where a statutory
3 AN END TO BEING KNOCKED OUT ON PENALTIES? 3 regime is not in place to offer that protection and that many jurisdictions (both common law and civil law) have recognised such a rule. The test for a penalty clause The Supreme Court judges took subtly different approaches to this question, although were unanimous in their view that the test is not limited to the binary question of whether a clause is a genuine pre-estimate of loss or a deterrent. In the leading judgment, Lords Neuberger and Sumption (with whom Lord Carnwath agreed) held that the test is whether the relevant clause imposes a detriment on the contract-breaker out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in the enforcement of its primary obligation. Lord Hodge and Lord Mance (with whom Lord Toulson agreed) found the test to be that (in Lord Hodge s words) the correct test for a penalty is whether the sum or remedy stipulated as a consequence of a breach of contract is exorbitant or unconscionable when regard is had to the innocent party s interest in the performance of the contract. It is unclear whether there was intended to be a distinction between a remedy out of all proportion and one which is exorbitant and unconscionable, but in any case Lord Clarke appears not to have thought so as he agreed with each of Lord Sumption, Lord Neuberger, Lord Hodge and Lord Mance. Whether or not there is ultimately found to be any difference in these tests, it is apparent that there will still be straightforward cases where the innocent party has no interest in the performance of the primary obligation beyond the receipt of liquidated damages so that the required analysis may be limited to whether those specified damages are a genuine pre-estimate of the loss of the innocent party....compensation IS NOW CLEARLY NOT NECESSARILY THE ONLY LEGITIMATE INTEREST THAT THE INNOCENT PARTY MIGHT HAVE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DEFAULTING PARTY S PRIMARY OBLIGATIONS. However, in more complex cases, compensation is now clearly not necessarily the only legitimate interest that the innocent party might have in the performance of the defaulting party s primary obligations. Such cases will require a detailed analysis of the interests of the innocent party, at the time the contract was made, in requiring performance of the primary obligation by its counterparty. Application to the facts Applying that test to the Cavendish case, the Supreme Court found that Cavendish had a substantial and legitimate interest in protecting the goodwill of the business it was purchasing, because that goodwill was critical to its value to Cavendish and Mr Makdessi s loyalty was critical to the goodwill. Cavendish obtained that protection by providing a strong financial incentive to Mr Makdessi to remain loyal to the company and not to compete with it. Similarly, Cavendish had a legitimate interest in matching the price of the shares to the value that Mr Makdessi was contributing to the business. Clauses 5.1 and 5.6 were therefore found to be legitimately addressing the disloyalty of a seller who was prepared to attack the company s goodwill. That loyalty was found to be entirely undermined when Mr Makdessi breached a restrictive covenant not to compete with the business he was selling, regardless of the severity of the breach. Despite the very significant financial consequences to Mr Makdessi, the Supreme Court were not satisfied that the effect of clause 5.1 and 5.6 was out of all proportion to or exorbitant or unconscionable in light of that legitimate interest of Cavendish. In ParkingEye, even though it was accepted that the fine of 85 was not a genuine pre-estimate of loss (in fact there was found to be no financial loss whatsoever), it
4 4 Watson Farley & Williams was held not to be a penalty. The fine was found to be an understandable ingredient of a parking scheme serving the legitimate interests of the operator of the car-park to: (i) manage the use of available parking space and (ii) provide the only income stream available to the operator which allowed it to offer two hours of free parking to its customers. THE DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT EMPHASISE THE DESIRE OF THE ENGLISH COURTS TO HOLD PARTIES TO THE BARGAINS THAT THEY HAVE WILLINGLY MADE... The future of penalty clauses The decisions of the Supreme Court emphasise the desire of the English Courts to hold parties to the bargains that they have willingly made and extend the circumstances in which the contract terms will be enforced far beyond those under the traditional test. From the point of view of certainty of contractual relations, this is to be welcomed. However, it is difficult to predict precisely how the various tests expounded by the judges will be interpreted in future. In a case of such importance to commercial parties, it would have been preferable for the judges to have agreed upon a single formulation of the relevant principles, particularly in circumstances where there is (apparently) no dispute in substance. After all, much of the previous uncertainty concerning the law on penalties arose from a decision given by the House of Lords 100 years ago in which a number of different judgments were given. A final point of note is that Lords Sumption and Neuberger placed some emphasis on the context in which the contract was made in reaching their decision, stating that In a negotiated contract, between properly advised parties of comparable bargaining power, the strong initial presumption must be that the parties themselves are the best judges of what is legitimate. The other judges also relied (apparently to a lesser extent) on these principles. A further outcome of this decision may therefore be that whilst the rule on penalties will continue to apply to commercial contracts (which Cavendish argued unsuccessfully against in principle), in practice where the parties had equal bargaining power and reputable advice when the contract was made, the hurdle which must be surmounted to prove a clause a penalty will be a very high, if not unreachable, one. In those transactions, the lesson to be taken from the Supreme Court s judgment is that parties need to be increasingly wary of agreeing to clauses providing for pre-determined remedies for breach of contract, given that the scope for later arguing that those clauses are penalties may be greatly reduced.
5 AN END TO BEING KNOCKED OUT ON PENALTIES? 5 FOR MORE INFORMATION Should you like to discuss any of the matters raised in this Briefing, please speak with the authors below or your regular contact at Watson Farley & Williams. ANDREW WATERS Partner London awaters@wfw.com BEN LAMBLE Senior Associate London blamble@wfw.com Publication code number: v1 Watson Farley & Williams 2015 All references to Watson Farley & Williams, WFW and the firm in this document mean Watson Farley & Williams LLP and/or its Affiliated Entities. Any reference to a partner means a member of Watson Farley & Williams LLP, or a member or partner in an Affiliated Entity, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualification. The transactions and matters referred to in this document represent the experience of our lawyers. This publication is produced by Watson Farley & Williams. It provides a summary of the legal issues, but is not intended to give specific legal advice. The situation described may not apply to your circumstances. If you require advice or have questions or comments on its subject, please speak to your usual contact at Watson Farley & Williams. This publication constitutes attorney advertising. wfw.com
UK: CORPORATE BRIEFING DECEMBER 2015
BRIEFING UK: CORPORATE DECEMBER 2015 PROPOSED AIM RULES CHANGES ANNUAL SLAVERY STATEMENT CHANGES TO INSOLVENCY LAW SMALL BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND EMPLOYMENT ACT 2015 NEW UK GAAP PENALTY CLAUSES Note from
More informationAre you covered? Coverage issues for construction professionals Part 2
Professional Risks - Construction Part 2 June 2015 Are you covered? Coverage issues for construction professionals Part 2 In this two part guide we will be looking at issues that frequently arise when
More informationSupreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50
Alerter 24 th July 2015 Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 The Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in Coventry v Lawrence in which it considered the
More informationCONSUMER RIGHTS ACT 2015:
BRIEFING CONSUMER RIGHTS ACT 2015: COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES DEALING WITH CONSUMERS SEPTEMBER 2015 THE CONSUMER RIGHTS ACT 2015 WILL TAKE EFFECT FROM 1ST OCTOBER. THIS BRIEFING OFFERS A COMPLIANCE
More informationQBE European Operations Professional liability
QBE European Operations Professional liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited QBE Professional Liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited/november 2013 1 Disclosure of insurance details
More informationSummary Disposal of Unfair Relationships Claims: Axton & Axton v GE Money Mortgages Limited
Alerter Banking, Finance and Consumer Credit 3 June 2015 Summary Disposal of Unfair Relationships Claims: Axton & Axton v GE Money Mortgages Limited and another [2015] EWHC 1343 By Judgment on appeal 1.
More informationNEW PROTECTION FOR THAI GUARANTORS AND MORTGAGORS 11 FEBRUARY 2015
BRIEFING NEW PROTECTION FOR THAI GUARANTORS AND MORTGAGORS 11 FEBRUARY 2015 AMENDMENTS TO THE THAI CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL CODE COME INTO EFFECT TODAY. THESE CHANGES AFFECT THE WAYS GUARANTEES AND MORTGAGES
More informationJUDGMENT. JMMB Merchant Bank Limited (Formerly Capital and Credit Merchant Bank Limited) (Appellant) v The Real Estate Board (Respondent) (Jamaica)
Easter Term [2015] UKPC 16 Privy Council Appeal No 0067 of 2014 JUDGMENT JMMB Merchant Bank Limited (Formerly Capital and Credit Merchant Bank Limited) (Appellant) v The Real Estate Board (Respondent)
More informationNEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR NON-PERFORMING LOANS IN GREECE
BRIEFING NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR NON-PERFORMING LOANS IN GREECE DECEMBER 2015 GREECE HAS OPENED THE WAY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SECONDARY MARKET FOR NON-PERFORMING LOANS WITH THE INTRODUCTION OF
More informationSubject to, notwithstanding and without prejudice to what do they all mean?
Welcome Time. Never seems to be enough of it! This month is about shortcuts. Time pressure can make shorthand expressions which achieve the desired result useful tools, but are such expressions always
More informationDrafting Restrictive Covenants In Employment Contracts
Drafting Restrictive Covenants In Contracts Introduction Restrictive covenants are commonly used in contracts of employment to prevent employees from taking advantage of resources or goodwill obtained
More informationUnfair Terms in Consumer Contracts: Advice to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills SUMMARY
Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts: Advice to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills SUMMARY March 2013 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION UNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACTS:
More informationSupreme Court delivers judgment in the Employers' Liability Trigger Litigation
Supreme Court delivers judgment in the Employers' Liability Trigger Litigation On 28th March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in BAI (Run Off) Limited v Durham [2012] UKSC 14, the test-cases
More informationContract Disputes How to prevent them; How to deal with them
Contract Disputes How to prevent them; How to deal with them Presentation by Geoff Browne, Victorian Small Business Commissioner to the Victorian Waste Management Association 27 May 2014 Thank you for
More informationResponse of the Association of Costs Lawyers to the consultation on the impact of the Jackson reforms on costs and case management
Response of the Association of Costs Lawyers to the consultation on the impact of the Jackson reforms on costs and case management 1. Introduction The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) broadly welcomes
More informationSteen & Co Employment Solicitors
Steen & Co Employment Solicitors COMPROMISE AGREEMENTS This is a note about some of the issues involved in Compromise Agreements. It is not a substitute for individual advice that, of course, we will give
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A09-1771 James Corriveau, Appellant, vs. Washington
More informationOFFER BY WPP GROUP PLC ("WPP")
THE TAKEOVER PANEL 2001/15 OFFER BY WPP GROUP PLC ("WPP") FOR TEMPUS GROUP PLC ("TEMPUS") 1. The Takeover Panel met on 31 October to hear an appeal by WPP against the Panel Executive's refusal to allow
More informationThe Treatment Of Pension Claims In UK Insolvency Process
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Treatment Of Pension Claims In UK Insolvency Process
More informationCONSUMER INSURANCE LAW: PRE-CONTRACT DISCLOSURE AND MISREPRESENTATION
THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION CONSUMER INSURANCE LAW: PRE-CONTRACT DISCLOSURE AND MISREPRESENTATION Joint Report SUMMARY 1.1 The English and Scottish Law Commissions recommend new
More informationwww.costsbarrister.co.uk NIHL and success fees Andrew Hogan Barrister at law 1
www.costsbarrister.co.uk NIHL and success fees Andrew Hogan Barrister at law 1 On 13 th March 2015 at 4pm, Mr Justice Phillips handed down judgment in conjoined cases, Dalton and others.v.british Telecommunications
More informationEmployment Law Guide
Employment Law Guide Settlement Agreements (Formally known as Compromise Agreements) See the separate guide. Unfair Dismissal Length of employment Employees can only bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal
More informationLAC CASE NO: JA 38/08 SANLAM LIFE INSURANCE LIMITED JUDGMENT. [1] Leave to appeal having been granted by the Labour Court, this is an
IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT JOHANNESBURG) LAC CASE NO: JA 38/08 In the matter between SANLAM LIFE INSURANCE LIMITED APPELLANT And THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND
More informationARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES. August 22, 1997
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 1997-03 FEE ARBITRATION ISSUES INVOLVING CONTINGENCY FEES August 22, 1997 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Committee on Mandatory Fee Arbitration.
More informationAn introduction to European employment law for Korean companies
Acquisitions issues to expect Employing staff in Europe An introduction to European employment law for Korean companies For Korean companies encountering the European employment law system for the first
More informationEmployment Law e-alert December 2012
Employment Law e-alert December 2012 Welcome Welcome to December s e-alert. Following on from last month s e-alert on the topic of constructive dismissal, this month s Q&A takes a look at the area of unfair
More informationResponse of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) Civil Law Reform Bill - CP53/09
Response of Browne Jacobson LLP (Solicitors) - CP53/09 February 2010 Contents Contents... 2 Introduction... 3 Browne Jacobson LLP... 3 Interest in the Consultation... 3 The Response... 3 Summary... 4 Response
More informationJUDGMENT. From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. before. Lord Neuberger Lord Mance Lord Clarke Lord Sumption Lord Reed
[2015] UKPC 37 Privy Council Appeal No 0031 of 2014 and 0032 of 2014 JUDGMENT NH International (Caribbean) Limited (Appellant) v National Insurance Property Development Company Limited (Respondent) (Trinidad
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationAn introduction to European employment law for Japanese companies
Acquisitions issues to expect Employing staff in Europe An introduction to European employment law for Japanese companies For Japanese companies encountering the European employment law system for the
More information****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationPerformance bonds and bank guarantees
Investing in Infrastructure International Best Legal Practice in Project and Construction Agreements January 2016 Damian McNair Partner, Legal M: +61 421 899 231 E: damian.mcnair@au.pwc.com Performance
More informationPg. 01 French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP
Contents French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP 1 Excelerate Technology Limited v Cumberbatch and Others 3 Downing v Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 5 Yeo v Times Newspapers Limited
More informationGeneral Employment Issues Common to Transportation Companies. Presented by Michael Aasen, Partner McLennan Ross LLP October 2, 2014
General Employment Issues Common to Transportation Companies Presented by Michael Aasen, Partner McLennan Ross LLP October 2, 2014 What is it? Terms which govern the relationship between an employer and
More informationJUDGMENT. From the Court of Appeal of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. before. Lord Mance Lord Clarke Lord Sumption Lord Carnwath Lord Hodge
Easter Term [2015] UKPC 22 Privy Council Appeal No 0022 of 2012 JUDGMENT Elizabeth Ram (Administrator of the estate of Pearl Baboolal) (Appellant) v Motor and General Insurance Company Limited (Respondent)
More informationYour settlement agreement - the key issues
www.settlement-agreement.org Your rights Settlement agreements are agreements governed by employment law statutes applicable in the UK. The legal system is designed to protect you from signing away valuable
More informationAfter 160 Years, Foss v. Harbottle Still Rules
Can Shareholders Sue for Harm to their Company? After 160 Years, Foss v. Harbottle Still Rules By Albert S. Frank, LL.B. When a company is harmed, this naturally affects the shareholders. The harm would
More informationlate payment The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998: A User s Guide
late payment The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998: A User s Guide Index Introduction The importance of prompt payment Legal Warning Section 1: Understanding the legislation What is
More informationKnowhow briefs Without Prejudice
Knowhow briefs Without Prejudice Executive Summary: Without Prejudice ( WP ) communications made in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute may not be used in court as evidence of an admission. WP communications
More informationMexico. Rodolfo Trampe, Jorge Díaz, José Palomar and Carlos López. Von Wobeser y Sierra, S.C.
Mexico Rodolfo Trampe, Jorge Díaz, José Palomar and Carlos López Market overview 1 What kinds of outsourcing take place in your jurisdiction? In Mexico, a subcontracting regime (understood as the regime
More informationAm I in a Partnership?
magrath LLP Am I in a Partnership? Many people do not realise how easy it is to form a legal partnership and indeed, may be in a partnership without realising it! What is a partnership? It has become common
More informationDrafting and enforcing non-compete agreements in the European Union: the examples of France, Germany and Italy
Drafting and enforcing non-compete agreements in the European Union: the examples of France, Germany and Italy Yasmine Tarasewicz Partner June 17, 2010 1 Introduction Non-competition in the relations between
More informationDuties of the directors of companies in financial difficulties. slaughter and may. October 2010
Duties of the directors of companies in financial difficulties slaughter and may October 2010 Contents 1. Introduction 01 2. Overview 01 3. Practical guidance 02 4. Common law, statutory and regulatory
More informationLimiting liability for professional firms
Limiting liability for professional firms Introduction Disputes can arise between providers of professional services and their clients or other (third) parties for a number of reasons. Limiting or excluding
More informationB a n k i n g a n d F i n a n c e B u l l e t i n. M a y 2 0 1 4. Page 1. Asia > Middle East > Europe International Capabilities Delivered Locally
B a n k i n g a n d F i n a n c e B u l l e t i n M a y 2 0 1 4 T h e H i g h T h r e s h o l d o f P r o v i n g U n c o n s c i o n a b l e C a l l s o n P e r f o r m a n c e B o n d s S a n d r a H
More informationEffects of the Cancellation of Italian Companies from the Companies Register and the Succession of the Shareholders 1
Effects of the Cancellation of Italian Companies from the Companies Register and the Succession of the Shareholders 1 BY FRANCESCA PETRONIO & FABIO COZZI June 2013 During the last three years, the Italian
More information11 U.S.C. 109(e) Liquidated Debt Non-contingent debt. 7/24/95 PSH Unpublished
11 U.S.C. 109(e) Liquidated Debt Non-contingent debt In re Ronald L. and Linda E. Sailstad Case No. 395-30591-psh13 7/24/95 PSH Unpublished The debtors filed a chapter 13 petition in which they listed
More informationCHANGE IN U.S. PARTNERSHIP TAX RULES WILL REQUIRE CHANGES TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS
BRIEFING CHANGE IN U.S. PARTNERSHIP TAX RULES WILL REQUIRE CHANGES TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS NOVEMBER 2015 PROVISIONS IN THE BIPARTISAN BUDGET ACT OF 2015 CHANGE THE RULE FOR TAX AUDITS AND CONTESTS OF
More informationCOST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
International Academy of Comparative Law 18th World Congress Washington D.C. July 21-31, 2010 Topic II.C.1 COST AND FEE ALLOCATION IN CIVIL PROCEDURE National Reporter - Slovenia: Nina Betetto Supreme
More informationEmployers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims
Employers' Responsibilities When Making Settlements in Employment-Related Claims Contributed by: Elizabeth Erickson * & Ira B. Mirsky **, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP Employee litigation alleging discrimination
More informationNSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET
NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET Introduction 1. The New South Wales Court of Appeal, in a unanimous Judgment on Thursday 31 March 2005, sent some clear messages to legal
More informationCombar/CLLS Guidance note on the Agreement for the Supply of Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case
Combar/CLLS Guidance note on the Agreement for the Supply of Services by a Barrister in a Commercial Case Introduction... 2 Background... 2 Entering into an agreement incorporating the Terms... 3 The Services...
More informationBeattie v Secretary of State for Social Security,
CASE ANALYSIS Income Support Capital to be treated as income - Structured settlement of damages for personal injury - Whether periodical payments that arise from the annuity are to be treated as income
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Brown, P.J., Nettesheim and Anderson, JJ.
2001 WI App 92 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-2681 Complete Title of Case: Petition for Review Filed MUTUAL SERVICE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, MUTUAL SERVICE LIFE INSURANCE
More informationPARKING APPEALS SERVICE LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH KEVIN JAMES BEATT (CASE NO. 1950092219) MATHEW CANNON (CASE NO. 1950071321)
PARKING APPEALS SERVICE LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH KEVIN JAMES BEATT (CASE NO. 1950092219) MATHEW CANNON (CASE NO. 1950071321) REVIEW OF THE DECISIONS OF THE PARKING ADJUDICATORS (REVIEW CASE NO. 1960067171)
More informationCOMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION OF APPOINTMENTS OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR EXECUTIVES
COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION OF APPOINTMENTS OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR EXECUTIVES DIRECTORS ADVISORY SERVICE FACTSHEET These Guidance Notes provide an outline of the relevant provisions, but they are not
More informationLaw Commission: fraud by victims of personal injury
Law Commission: fraud by victims of personal injury 1. An unnecessary enquiry The Law Commission says that the subject of their 11th programme was "suggested to us.to Thompsons, reviewing an issue that
More informationEmployment team bulletin January 2013
Page 1 Employment team bulletin January 2013 Alice Cave January 2013 In this bulletin, we consider some recent cases and set out the employment law changes due to come into force in 2013. Recent cases
More informationConflicts of Interest MiFID and the General Law
slaughter and may Companies Briefing Paper Act 2006 September 2008 Conflicts of Interest MiFID and the General Law Much has been said and written in recent years about the conflicts of interest that can
More informationCONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT
CONTINGENCY FEE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ATTORNEY AND CLIENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this Day of, 2009 by and between JOSEPH L. KASHI, Attorney at Law, hereinafter called "Attorney" and,
More informationGlobal Guide to Competition Litigation Poland
Global Guide to Competition Litigation Poland 2012 Table of Contents Availability of private enforcement in respect of competition law infringements and jurisdiction... 1 Conduct of proceedings and costs...
More informationAccountants' liability for negligence. Accountancy Ireland, 33 (5): 21-23. http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5383
Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Accountants' liability for negligence Author(s)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-01170-COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-01170-COA JAY FOSTER APPELLANT v. PAUL KOTSAKOS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/14/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES B. PERSONS COURT FROM WHICH
More informationThe court held a hearing on March 27, 2008 to consider the application by
STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION Do.cket Nos. cv-70-10..d. AP-06-56 ' I ',, '.', ',1-- I I. C\ J. ELIZABETH NIITCHELL, et al., v. Plaintiffs, PORTLAND FINE FURNITURE and DESIGN
More informationResidue Case Note: The Iniquity of Equity: Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd
Residue Case Note: The Iniquity of Equity: Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd Stephanie Lee * Solicitor, Travers Smith LLP Equity release schemes; Leaseback; Mortgages; Occupation; Overriding interests;
More informationCASE EXAMPLES CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITIES & OBLIGATIONS TO INSURE
CASE EXAMPLES CONTRACTUAL INDEMNITIES & OBLIGATIONS TO INSURE NSW Arabian Horse Association Inc v Olympic Coordination Authority [2005] NSWCA 210 New South Wales Court of Appeal, 23 June 2005 Facts The
More informationDAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY
DAMAGES FOR LATE PAYMENT AND THE INSURER S DUTY OF GOOD FAITH SUMMARY S.1 In this Issues Paper we consider whether a policyholder should be entitled to damages where the insurer has refused to pay a valid
More informationThird Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors
Alert Third Circuit Approves Use of Escrow Agreements Funded by Acquirers to Pay Junior Creditors Before Senior Creditors September 21, 2015 An asset purchaser s payments into segregated accounts for the
More informationEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR LIMITED COMPANY S CLAIM FOR DISCRIMINATION
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR LIMITED COMPANY S CLAIM FOR DISCRIMINATION In the first judgment of its type, an Employment Tribunal has ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear a claim for
More informationPrinciples in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights
Principles in Collision: Labor Union rights v. Employee civil Rights Barry Winograd Arbitrator and mediator in Oakland, California Member of the National Academy of Arbitrators Adjunct faculty of the law
More informationINVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT
INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT This investment adviser representative agreement ( Agreement ), made as of, 20, is between Partners for Prosperity, Inc., a Nevada corporation, with the principal
More informationProfessional Indemnity Insurance Glossary of Terms
Professional Indemnity Insurance Glossary of Terms Index Aggregation of claims Automatic reinstatement Average provision Cancellation Civil liability Claim Claims made Consumer protection legislation Continuous
More informationDecision 131/2008 Mr N and East Ayrshire Council. Tender Documents. Reference No: 200800298 Decision Date: 7 October 2008
Decision 131/2008 Tender Documents Reference No: 200800298 Decision Date: 7 October 2008 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews KY16 9DS Tel: 01334 464610
More informationPresent Situation of IP Disputes in Japan
Present Situation of IP Disputes in Japan Feb 19, 2014 Chief Judge Toshiaki Iimura 1 1 IP High Court established -Apr.1.2005- l Appeal cases related to patent rights etc. from district courts nationwide
More information1. This is an appeal by Gregor McGill FRICS & Gregor C. McGill & Co. (firm).
ROYAL INSTITUTION OF CHARTERED SURVEYORS APPEAL PANEL HEARING Case of Mr Gregor McGill [0044030] and Gregor C. McGill & Co (firm) [004755] Cheshire, WA2 On Friday 13 March 2015 At Warrington Village Urban
More informationProtecting Your Business Interests
August 2004 Protecting Your Business Interests Restraint Of Trade Clauses Restraint of trade clauses, which seek to prevent former employees or owners from engaging in activities that compete with the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE B198883
Filed 2/28/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MICHAEL J. HARRINGTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. B198883 (Los Angeles
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationEMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR?
EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR? Deciding between an employee or contractor Contracting has emerged as an alternative to the traditional employment relationship. A contractor can be engaged directly as a natural
More informationJohn Evason, Monica Kurnatowska and Daniel Ellis Partners, Collective Rights Group
Employment Focus on Redundancy London August 2008 Contents What is Redundancy?.........................2 Individual Consultation........................3 Collective Consultation........................4
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE PATTEN LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON and LORD JUSTICE CHRISTOPHER CLARKE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWCA Civ 1539 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT MR JUSTICE BURTON [2012] EWHC 3582
More informationEmployment Law in Bermuda
Employment Law in Bermuda Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering issues pertaining to employment law in Bermuda. It deals in broad terms with the requirements
More informationA&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
More informationSANTAM UMBRELLA LIABILITY
SANTAM UMBRELLA LIABILITY DEFINED EVENTS 1. Damages, costs, fees and expenses which the insured shall become legally liable to pay consequent upon Injury, Damage, Malice or Negligent Advice which occur
More informationBindmans Employment News
Bindmans Employment News July 2009 Dispute Resolution: Changes in the Law Contents Dispute Resolution: Changes in the Law Case Law Update Seminars & Lectures Mark Emery Promoted to Partner Bindmans Employment
More informationBRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC V OFCOM (ETHERNET DETERMINATIONS) [2014] CAT 14
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC V OFCOM (ETHERNET DETERMINATIONS) [2014] CAT 14 Ligia Osepciu Monckton Chambers August 2014 On 1 August 2014, the Competition Appeal Tribunal ( the Tribunal ) delivered its
More informationCHIEF JUSTICE STEELE S POSITION CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF DELAWARE COMMON LAW FIDUCIARY RULES TO DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS AND
CHIEF JUSTICE STEELE S POSITION CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF DELAWARE COMMON LAW FIDUCIARY RULES TO DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS AND LLCs AN LLC PRACTITIONER S RESPONSE By John M. Cunningham 1 I. INTRODUCTION
More informationAn Overview of UK Insolvency Procedures and the Considerations for Banks with an Insolvent Customer
An Overview of UK Insolvency Procedures and the Considerations for Banks with an Insolvent Customer November 2011 1 An Overview of UK Insolvency Procedures and the Considerations for Banks with an Insolvent
More informationThe Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act and its impact on Employers Liability by Terry Renouf, partner, Berrymans Lace Mawer
The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act and its impact on Employers Liability by Terry Renouf, partner, Berrymans Lace Mawer Thank you for inviting me to speak today to CII members. I am talking to you
More informationAustralian Proportionate Liability Regime
Australian Proportionate Liability Regime May 2014 16 NOVEMBER 2011 Curwoods Lawyers Australia Square Plaza Building Level 9, 95 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000 t +61 2 9231 4166 f +61 2 9221 3720 CURWOODS
More informationANATOMY OF AN INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE DIVORCE LAST TANGO IN MINNEAPOLIS
ANATOMY OF AN INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE DIVORCE LAST TANGO IN MINNEAPOLIS JOHN M. VERNON Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C. 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone: 214.855.4784 Fax: 214.855.4300 E-mail:
More informationThe Little Book of UK Employment Law for US Employers. Handling dismissals in the UK
The Little Book of UK Employment Law for US Employers Handling dismissals in the UK Two countries separated by a common language. (George Bernard Shaw) Welcome 2 Employment contracts: anti at will! 4 But
More informationCONTRACT BASICS. This Fact Sheet has been made possible by the funding received by the Creative People s Centre from the New Zealand Law Foundation.
CONTRACT BASICS What is a contract? How is a contract formed? What is Offer and Acceptance? Why is Intention to create legal relations important? How does uncertainty arise in the context of a contract?
More informationHow To Decide If A Judgment Against A Man Is Valid
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION THE MOUNTBATTEN SURETY COMPANY, INC. : October Term, 2001 Plaintiff, : v. : No. 3341 LANDMARK
More informationPay-When-Paid Clauses
Pay-When-Paid Clauses General contractors are frequently faced with claims for extras or delay emanating from subcontractors but attributable to acts or omissions of the owner or consultant. In these cases
More informationCOMMENTARY. California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos?
May 2013 JONES DAY COMMENTARY California s New Subcontractor Defense Regime for Non-Residential Projects: Creating Order or Chaos? As explained in a recent Commentary (available at http://www.jonesday.com/navigating_treacherous_
More informationTo be opened on receipt
To be opened on receipt A2 GCE LAW G6/01/RM Law of Contract Special Study PRE-RELEASE SPECIAL STUDY MATERIAL *G131980113* JANUARY AND JUNE 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO TEACHERS This Resource Material must be opened
More informationJAMAICA THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN GODFREY THOMPSON APPELLANT
[2014] JMCA Civ 37 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT CIVIL APPEAL NO 41/2007 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE MORRISON JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA THE HON MS JUSTICE LAWRENCE-BESWICK JA (AG) BETWEEN
More informationWhat You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
More informationObtaining Indemnity Through Effective Tender Letters
Page 1 of 5 Portfolio Media. Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Obtaining Indemnity Through Effective
More information