How To Handle Complaints In Health And Social Care
|
|
- David Porter
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Policy and Procedure Relating to The Handling of Formal Complaints (including unreasonably persistent complainants) DOCUMENT CONTROL Version: 14.1 Ratified by: Risk Management Sub Group Date ratified: 15 January 2013 (amended 17 July 2013 Name of Originator / Author: Complaints Manager Name of responsible Risk Management Sub Group committee/individual: Date Issued: 18 January 2013 Review Date: January 2016
2 Contents Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. PURPOSE OF THE POLICY 6 3. SCOPE 6 4. RESPONSIBILITIES, ACCOUNTABILITIES AND DUTIES The Trust Nominated Board member Complaints Manager PALS Coordinator Assistant Directors/Medical Director Investigating Officers Head of Patient Safety and Experience Risk Management Sub Group Organisational Learning Forum Clinical Governance Group PROCEDURE/IMPLEMENTATION Policy and Procedure for Dealing with Formal Complaints. Stage I - Local 11 Resolution How joint complaints are handled between organisations Policy and Procedure for Dealing with Formal Complaints. Stage II - Referral 15 to the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman 5.3 Procedure for Complaints concerning Local Authority service which have 15 been integrated with RDASH services 5.4 Importance of Good Communication and Engaging All Stakeholders Links with the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) Unreasonably Persistent Complainants Policy and Procedure for Handling Large Scale Complaints Policy and Procedure for Complaints that may Involve Criminal Proceedings Calling the Police Concurrent Investigations Investigation Following Police Enquiry Policy and Procedure Relating to the Allegations of Patient Ill Treatment Supporting Service Users and Complainants How the Trust makes improvements as a result of a concern or a complaint TRAINING IMPLICATIONS MONITORING ARRANGEMENTS 24 Page 2 of 45
3 EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT SCREENING Privacy, dignity and respect Mental Capacity Act LINKS TO ANY ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS REFERENCES APPENDICES Appendix A Flow Chart of Complaints 28 Appendix Bi Contact Preferences Form 31 Appendix Bii Diversity Monitoring Form 32 Appendix C Appendix C(ii) How joint complaints are handled between organisations: Rotherham and Doncaster Protocol for Handling NHS/Social Services Inter-Agency Complaints How joint complaints are handled between organisations: Protocol for Handling NHS/Social Services Inter-Agency Complaints (North and North East Lincs) Appendix D NPSA Risk Matrix 42 Appendix E Guidelines for Writing a Statement/Report of Events 44 Page 3 of 45
4 1. INTRODUCTION The Local Authority Social Services and NHS Complaints (England) Regulations 2009 ( The Regulations ) was received for implementation from 1 st April The arrangements are intended to make the whole experience of making a complaint simpler, more user-friendly and more responsive to people s individuals needs (rather than a one size fits all). They also emphasise that health and social care services should routinely learn from complaints, feeding into service improvement, and where possible informing the commissioning of services. A simple two-stage complaints system, focusing on Local Resolution, and subsequently, if unresolved, an investigation by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) or Local Government Ombudsman (LGO), has replaced the previous system. Under the new system, the complainant must also be made aware of how they can contact the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Complaints handling aims to: Resolve complaints more effectively by responding more personally and positively to individuals who are unhappy, and Ensure that opportunities for services to learn and improve are not lost By reforming the health and social care complaints system, it is envisaged that the following will be achieved: Remove the rigid process-based arrangements that previously applied Unify, simplify and make the arrangements more flexible Make the arrangements more accessible to people Work as a one-stop shop at local level, with unified handling of complaints across health and social care boundaries Encourage and empower people to come forward with complaints and concerns, supported by existing PALS and customer service arrangements Treat each case according to its individual nature and the complainant s desired outcome Focus on satisfactory outcomes through swift, local resolution Seek to ensure lessons are learnt from individual complaints and that those lessons lead to service improvement Place a responsibility on commissioning bodies, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and Local Authorities (LAs) to ensure that providers from which they contract services have arrangements in place that respond effectively to individuals making complaints, and demonstrate that improvements in response to complaints are implemented The approach allows local health and social care organisations to determine the mechanisms best suited for them to deliver effective complaints arrangements within their own organisations, taking into account local circumstances. Page 4 of 45
5 The procedures are underpinned by the six core objectives identified in the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman s 2008 publication Principles of Good Complaint Handling and supported by Being Open Policy and the Guidance on Duty of Candour: 1. Getting it right 2. Being customer focussed 3. Being open and accountable 4. Acting fairly and proportionately 5. Putting things right 6. Seeking continuous improvement The emphasis continues to be placed on conciliation/mediation to respond effectively to the satisfaction of the complainant at local level, and the current intentions remain: People and their carers are aware of and can use with support where needed, and without prejudice to their care and treatment, simple and clear arrangements for handling comments, concerns and complaints Complaints about failures to ensure people s health, safety and welfare are investigated and resolved properly and effectively Learning from complaints is included along with learning from other events, in management and governance arrangements Ease of access for service users and complainants A simplified procedure with common features, for complaints about any of the services provided as part of the NHS Making it easier to extract lessons learnt from complaints to further improve services for patients Fairness for staff and complainants alike More rapid, open responses, conducive to the majority of complaints being resolved through the Local Resolution process, involving conciliation/mediation, where appropriate An approach that is honest and thorough, with the prime aim of resolving the problems and satisfying the concerns of the complainant The Essential Standards of Quality and Safety published by the Care Quality Commission in December 2009, sets out the requirements with regard to complaints under Regulation 17. It is a requirement that the procedures are available, understood and well publicised, in suitable formats, and includes how the person can contact the Care Quality Commission. Telephone and contact details will be included in the Trust s Complaints leaflet which will be made widely available throughout the Trust. Timescales The new Local Authority Social Services and NHS Complaints (Regulations) 2009 have removed statutory timescales in responding to complaints. However, % response to complaints within 25 days is included in the national patient experience quality indicators. Based on current experience, it is anticipated that only a small number of highly complex complaints will require additional time, and managers need to be aware of the need to respond in a timely and comprehensive way, as agreed with the complainant in the complaint resolution Page 5 of 45
6 plan. These highly complex complaints are anticipated to be investigated and responded to within no longer than 60 working days. Reporting The NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) requires NHS organisations to have robust systems in place for the reporting, management and investigation of incidents, to facilitate organisational learning and for internal and external information to be used to improve the quality of services: Complaints and claims, when examined in conjunction with reported incidents and near misses, will allow trends to be identified and improvements to be implemented. This can lead to the prevention or recurrence of incidents, claims and complaints. The sharing of lessons learned from one service to other areas of the Trust will help to ensure that any system failures discovered during investigations are adopted by the Trust as a whole and pockets of good practice are not isolated (NHSLA, 2008). The Trust s Complaints Manager will analyse and report on any trends identified to facilitate service improvements and organisational learning. See Section 7: Monitoring of the Policy. Any comments of complaints received which describe events considered to be an adverse or serious incident should trigger the need for a serious incident investigation to be undertaken. As described in the Monitor Compliance Framework Foundation Trusts should have in place adequate processes or procedures to identify and report serious complaints to Monitor. A failure to do this may be reflected in a Foundation Trust s governance risk rating. When assessing governance risk, Monitor considers, amongst other relevant information, significant trends in complaints. All serious complaints (risk rating high and significant) and significant trends in complaints should, therefore, be reported to Monitor. Additionally, where a complaint, or other matter has arisen, which may result in any resulting material which may impact upon the Trust s reputation, this should also be reported to Monitor. The Investigating Officer will assess the risk of the complaint using the NPSA Risk matrix 2. PURPOSE OF THE POLICY The purpose of this policy is to set out the procedures which the Trust has in place to support the effective implementation of the The Local Authority Social Services (LASS) and the NHS Complaints (England) Regulations 2009 and the Compliance Framework requirements: reporting serious complaints to Monitor by setting out the arrangements to: provide fair and equitable access for service users to make complaints and to provide an honest and open response to these complaints. provide service users and those acting on their behalf with support to bring a complaint or to make a comment, where such assistance is necessary have mechanisms in place to learn from complaints share this learning across the Trust where appropriate. Page 6 of 45
7 This policy also endorses the principles set out in Reform of Health & Social Care Complaints (DH, 2008), Principles of Good Complaints Handling, (Health Service Ombudsman, 2008) and Making Experiences Count Toolkit (DH, 2008) 3. SCOPE This policy covers all activities of the Trust and staff in its employ. 4. RESPONSIBILITIES, ACCOUNTABILITES AND DUTIES 4.1 The Trust It is the responsibility of the Trust to: Nominate a Board Member to take responsibility for compliance with arrangements made under the Regulations and Compliance Framework requirement: reporting serious complaints to Monitor, and that action is taken as a result. In this Trust, this role is undertaken by the Executive Director of Business Assurance Have in post a person who is readily identifiable to service users and who will be responsible for managing the complaints handling function within the Trust. In this Trust, this role is undertaken by the Complaints Manager 1 Make arrangements to provide the full, appropriate service to service users (PALS/customer care/complaints staff). See Appendix A. Flow Chart of Complaints Ensure as far as possible that anyone making a complaint, either in their own right, or on behalf of a service user, is not treated any differently as a result of making the complaint Acknowledge complaints within three working days of receipt by the Complaints Manager. Acknowledgement may be either verbally or in writing Ensure that complaints are dealt with within the timescale agreed with the complainant (see Appendix B, Contact Preferences Form) Have in place systems which allow wherever possible for complaints to be completed at Stage I Local Resolution - within the Trust Provide awareness raising and training on an ongoing basis for staff, incorporating new guidance as and when required Recognise the importance of learning from complaints. It is recognised that the Trust should share knowledge and good practice - both internally and externally, whilst maintaining confidentiality - arising from complaints, to support improvements for service users and improved risk management 1 In the context of this policy, Complaints Manager refers to both the Complaints Manager and the Patient Experience and Complaints Manager Page 7 of 45
8 Have arrangements in place for structured, continuous independent monitoring of formal complaints and action plans. The Assistant Directors/Medical Director will undertake this task Prepare an annual report on the handling of complaints, including: o number of complaints received o subject matter o outcome of complaint (upheld or not) o record of further referral (Ombudsman) o thematic analysis of complaints, actions taken and lessons learnt A copy of the report should be shared with the relevant Commissioners and an annonymised copy should be available to the local community population and local agencies, where partnership protocols exist. Continue to promote effective joint working relationships. There is a duty to cooperate/co-coordinate complaints handling with other local organisations, under the Regulations where complaints involve more than one agency/organisation. See Appendix C. Rotherham and Doncaster Protocol for Handling NHS/Social Services Inter-Agency Complaints. Achieve fairness for both complainants and staff Work in partnership with groups representing service users, to promote equality of access to the complaints process. It is recognised that advocacy is extremely important to service users 4.2 Nominated Board Member The nominated Board Member - the Executive Director of Business Assurance - is responsible for compliance with the arrangements made under the Complaints Regulations and the Monitor Compliance Framework requirement to report serious complaints to Monitor, and for taking any required action as a result. 4.3 Complaints Manager The Complaints Manager will: Manage the complaints handling function within the Trust and be readily identifiable to service users. Advise Complainants of the complaints process, including advocacy services available in their area where appropriate. Make clear and accessible information about the complaints procedure widely available for service users and carers, which will include how people can contact the Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman and the Care Quality Commission. Telephone and contact details will be included in the Trust s Complaints leaflet which will be made widely available throughout the Trust. Page 8 of 45
9 Inform the Executive Director of Business Assurance of any serious complaints and significant trends in complaints, in order that these may be reported to Monitor accordingly. Any comments or complaints received which describe events considered to be an adverse or serious incident should trigger the need for a serious incident investigation to be undertaken. The Complaints Manager should refer these on to the Head of Patient Safety and Experience for her consideration. The Patient Experience Team will provide information, advice and support to distressed members of the public/patients/carers where large scale failures of services have occurred. Monitor complaint action plans, reporting progress to the Organisational Learning Forum on a monthly basis. Provide training for investigating officers in order that they are competent to address the issues raised, provide honest explanations that are based on fact and explain the reasons for decisions made Monitor that the procedures are followed in practice, and review the procedures as required Confirm that the complaint has been risk assessed following investigation. The risk assessment of complaints is considered good practice by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) Support Assistant Directors, the Medical Director, Service Managers, Modern Matrons and Clinical Directors to investigate and resolve complaints Liaise closely with Local Authority Social Services (LASS) Complaints Departments, where a review under the Local Authority complaints procedures should be invoked, and where complaints clearly relate to the LASS functions which have been delegated to the Trust The Patient Experience Team (PET) will randomly select a number of formal complaints where the team has been advised that complaint action plans have been completed and the identified actions implemented. Evidence to support that the actions have been implemented will be required to be sent to the PET in order to provide assure to the Board. Lessons learnt from complaints or concerns raised are shared at the Organisational Learning Forum so that Business Divisions can learn and share improvements as a result of investigations. Provide information regarding a complaint that may be regarded as a Serious Incident to the Director of Business Assurance Page 9 of 45
10 As a member of the Patient Experience Team, participate in a range of proactive measures with service users, carers and staff to encourage comments and feedback, with a view to reducing the number of formal complaints and promoting ongoing improvements in service quality 4.4 PALS Coordinator (see Patient Advice and Liaison Service Policy (PALS) Policy) The PALS Coordinator will: Work closely with the Complaints Manager, and in agreement with the complainant, to resolve complaints which might be more appropriately addressed via PALS Liaise directly with the relevant service areas as necessary to resolve complaints. The Patient Experience Team will provide information, advice and support to distressed members of the public/patients/carers where large scale failures of service have occurred. 4.5 Assistant Directors/Medical Director Assistant Directors/Medical Director will: Ensuring they have systems in place in order that patients, their relatives and carers are not treated differently as a result of raising a concern or a complaint. Provide structured, continuous independent monitoring of complaints, implementation of action plans and service improvements within their areas of responsibility Enter the risk to the relevant Directorate Risk Register or Corporate Risk Register. See the Trust Risk Management Strategy for further guidance. Where a high or significant risk is identified, this should be entered to the relevant directorate/corporate risk register. Undertake training in order that they are competent to address the issues raised, provide honest explanations that are based on fact and are able to explain the reasons for decisions made. Ensure that all complaints relating to their Business Division are fully investigated Appoint an appropriate Investigating Officer Send findings, recommendations, action plans and full draft responses to the Complaints Manager well within the agreed timescales, in order that the timescale agreed with the complainant is adhered to Page 10 of 45
11 Notify any staff involved in a complaint investigation of the outcome and any agreed actions Complete and signed off action plans Discuss and disseminate learning and implement any required policy and practice changes to promote ongoing improvement and organisational learning 4.6 Investigating Officers (Service Managers and Modern Matrons/Clinical Directors) Investigating Officers will: Reassuring patients, their relatives and carers that they will not treated differently as a result of raising a concern or a complaint. Undertake training in order that they are competent to address the issues raised, provide honest explanations that are based on fact and are able to explain the reasons for decisions made Investigate complaints as requested by the Assistant Director/Medical Director Identify a root cause of the complaint Submit a report of their findings, recommendations, full draft response and an action plan to the Assistant Director/Medical Director. The action plan will include a risk assessment of the complaint, the root cause of the complaint, and whether the complaint was upheld, partially upheld, or not upheld. The Patient Experience Team (PET) will randomly select a number of formal complaints where the team has been advised that complaint action plans have been completed and the identified actions implemented. Evidence to support that the actions have been implemented will be required to be sent to the PET in order to provide assure to the Board. Lessons learnt from complaints or concerns raised are shared at the Organisational Learning Forum so that Business Divisions can learn and share improvements as a result of investigations. Inform the Assistant Director/Medical Director of any staff training needs in relation to this policy arising from the investigation process Report on the implementation and completion of the action plan to the Patient Experience Team. 4.7 Head of Patient Safety and Experience The Head of Patient Safety and Experience will: Page 11 of 45
12 Consider any comments or complaints received which describe events considered to be an adverse or serious incident to identify the need to trigger a serious incident investigation to be undertaken. Oversee the production of the Triangulated Report. Provide information in the Quality Account and Trust Annual Report. Chair the Organisational Learning Forum to ensure that learning is shared via this forum across complaints, claims, incidents and safety, and that appropriate action is reported via the forum. Provide reports to the relevant groups as detailed below. 4.8 Risk Management Sub Group The Risk Management Sub Group is responsible for approving certain policies - including the Complaints Policy - as detailed in the Trust s Policy on Polices and to provide assurance to Policy and Planning Group level around its key responsibilities. It gives delegated responsibility to the Organisational Learning Forum (OLF) for the implementation of its work streams and action plans. 4.9 Organisational Learning Forum (OLF) The Organisational Learning Forum is responsible for developing and managing a structured approach to active organisational learning, where lessons learned are embedded in the Trust s culture and practice. The group will help to facilitate a fair blame (no blame) culture. This will include: the sharing of lessons learnt from concerns and complaints from one service to other areas of the Trust in order that any system failures discovered during investigations are adopted by the Trust as a whole and pockets of good practice are not isolated. The fostering of a learning and improvement culture, where all staff understand the value and benefits of learning from error and feel confident to report incidents Clinical Governance Group The purpose of the Clinical Governance Group is to enable the Board of Directors to obtain assurance that high standards of care are provided by the Trust and, in particular, that adequate and appropriate governance structures, processes and controls are in place throughout the Trust This will include: - monitoring trends in concerns and complaints received by the Trust and commissioning actions in response to adverse trends where appropriate - identifying areas for improvement in respect of concerns and complaints trends and ensuring appropriate action is taken. 5. PROCEDURE/IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 Policy and Procedure for dealing with Formal Complaints Stage I Local Resolution Page 12 of 45
13 1. Staff are encouraged to resolve complaints as far as is practicably possible within their local service area. However, where this is not possible, assistance should be given to the complainant for the complaint to be raised either with the Trust s Complaints Manager, or for more serious issues formally with the Chief Executive. Throughout the process, the Trust s Complaints Manager will be readily accessible to all concerned. Each complaint will be treated according to its individual nature and the wishes of the complainant, reinforcing the ethos of the new approach in making the whole experience of making a complaint simpler, more user-friendly and far more responsive to people s individual needs. It is the complainant s decision how they wish the complaint to be resolved and in what timescales. The complainant will be advised if the Trust cannot meet their wishes. When a complaint is received within the Trust, a letter of acknowledgement explaining the procedure will be sent to the complainant within three working days. See Appendix A. Complaints flow chart. The letter will acknowledge the person s concerns, ask if they wish to be contacted directly to discuss the issues raised, to agree a mutually agreed timescale for response, and if possible, what the complainant wishes as the outcome of the complaint. The complainant will be sent a Contact Preferences Form with the acknowledgement (see Appendix BI) which outlines their preferences. The letter also advises the complainant of the services provided by HealthWatch in terms of advocacy. The complainant is also advised by the Complaints Manager of other advocacy services available in their area. In line with national guidance and reporting requirements, the complainant will also be sent, with the acknowledgement, a diversity monitoring form (see Appendix Bii) If the complainant is not the service user, and is complaining on behalf of someone else, a consent form for the release of confidential information should be attached to the letter of acknowledgement, which should include information regarding service user confidentiality. Failure to return the signed form may result in a reduction of the amount and content of the information included in the letter of response, and this will be explained clearly to the complainant from the outset. 2. If the complainant is not willing or able to send a written complaint, but wishes the matter to be pursued, the Complaints Manager will arrange for a record of the complaint to be made and subsequently invite the complainant to sign and date it. If a complainant is unable or unwilling to sign a complaint letter written on their behalf, this does not invalidate the complaint and the procedure should still be followed. Where a complaint is made in writing, it is regarded as being made on the date it is received by the Complaints Manager. The complainant will be contacted to discuss the issues raised if the complainant requests this. This will normally be by the Complaints Manager or Assistant Director. Page 13 of 45
14 3. The timescale for resolution is expected to be dependant upon the severity and complexity of the complaint being made, but where possible, will be achieved within 25 working days. See also Page 6 of this policy for guidance on timescales. 4. The Complaints Manager/Assistant Director/Medical Director will consider the best way to respond to the complainant. This may include the offer of a meeting, a review by the Service Manager, or clinician for that speciality/service, or conciliation. The options will be discussed and agreed with the complainant. (See Appendix Bi Contact Preferences Form) In all cases, complainants should be advised of the role of the Independent Complaints Advocacy Service (ICAS) and how to contact them. Where a Director is named in a complaint, the Chief Executive will be informed, who will delegate an appropriate lead Director to coordinate the investigation. Where the Medical Director is named in a complaint, the Chief Executive will be informed, who will determine if external support/advice is appropriate to aid investigation of the complaint. If external support is not deemed to be required, the Trust s Deputy Chief Executive will lead the investigation, with appropriate medical advice. 5. Depending on the nature of the complaint and the wishes of the complainant, the complaint may be dealt with directly and without the need for a written response, via PALS. This will ensure prompt and appropriate action and help to resolve the complaint at a truly local level. 6. Complaints will be investigated appropriately in line with the ethos and procedures set out within the policy and within the timescale agreed with the complainant wherever possible. If an investigation cannot be completed on time, direct contact will be made with the complainant as soon as this is apparent, an apology provided and an extension period agreed and confirmed in writing. 7. When the investigation is complete, the Investigating Officer will submit a report of their findings, recommendations, full draft response and an action plan based on the recommendations, identifying areas for improvement where relevant and how this will be achieved to the Assistant Director/Medical Director. A copy should be retained by the Assistant Director/Medical Director to discuss and share with staff within the service in order to promote service improvements and organisational learning. The action plan should include actions to address all areas of the complaint where there has been deemed to be a less than satisfactory service. The action plan must have timescales for when these actions will be complete and an identified member of staff to lead on the action. The action plan will also include a risk rating using the NPSA Matrix (see Appendix D) The action plan will be monitored by the Complaints Manager to ensure that all actions are completed in a timely manner and the Assistant Director/Medical Director will be Page 14 of 45
15 expected to sign off completed action plans. This will usually be by means of a confirmatory from the Assistant Director/Medical Director. Reports will be provided monthly by the Complaints Manager to the Organisational Learning Forum on action plans completed and examples of action/learning undertaken. A more detailed report will be provided annually. 8. All draft complaint responses will be proof read, and amended where necessary, for quality assurance and monitoring purposes by the Complaints Manager, to check that all issues have been addressed/responded to, and that the style and content is in a consistent and accessible format for the complainant. The final draft will be approved by the Assistant Director/Medical Director prior to passing to the Chief Executive. 9. The Trust will respond to the complainant as agreed, identifying any organisational learning gained as a result of the complaint. The manner of the letter should be open, honest, empathetic, and include an apology where appropriate. Remember: It is both natural and desirable for those involved in treatment which produces an adverse result, for whatever reason, to sympathise with the patient or the patients relatives and to express sorrow or regret at the outcome. Such expressions of regret would not normally constitute an admission of liability, either in part or in full, and it is not the policy to prohibit them, or to dispute any payment, under any scheme, solely on the grounds of an expression of regret. Patients and relatives increasingly ask for detailed explanations of what led to adverse outcomes. Closely linked to this desire for information is the frequently expressed view that they will feel some consolation if lessons have been learnt for the future. (NHS Litigation Authority , Circular No, 02/02 to Chief Executives) All letters of response will also include a contact name, telephone number and details of who to contact, should the complainant wish to discuss the matter further. This will usually be the Assistant Director, Complaints Manager or Medical Director. Any action(s) agreed by the Trust should be conveyed to the complainant with an indication of when the actions are expected to be implemented and improvements achieved. 10. The response may include: an apology; an explanation and acknowledgement of responsibility; remedial action (reviewing or changing a decision provided to the complainant/revising policies, procedures or guidance/training and/or supervision of staff); financial redress for direct or indirect financial loss, loss of opportunity, inconvenience, distress, or any combination of these. Section 2 of the Compensation Act 2006, states, An apology, offer of treatment, or other redress, shall not of itself amount to an admission of negligence or breach of statutory duty. 11. In the event that the complainant is unhappy with the response, further actions to achieve Local Resolution of the complaint may be taken. However, at this point, the Trust may be satisfied that all reasonable steps to resolve the complaint have been Page 15 of 45
16 taken and that Local Resolution is complete. If the Trust can demonstrate that all reasonable and appropriate action has been taken, proportionate to a complaint, it would not be seen as a failure on behalf of the Trust. It is recognised that all complainants can not be satisfied, and it is the role of the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman to consider whether the Trust has responded appropriately to the complainant, and identified opportunities for organisational learning and service improvements. 12. Following the investigation of the complaint, if any issues of a disciplinary nature need to be considered, this will be carried out in accordance with the Trust s Disciplinary Procedure. This policy will only be concerned with resolving the complaint, not with investigatory disciplinary issues. 13. Any member of staff involved in a complaint should be fully informed of any allegations at the outset and given an opportunity to reply to the Investigating Officer. See Appendix E - Guidelines for Writing a Statement/Report of Event. They should be advised of the right to seek the advice of their professional association or trade union before commenting on the complaint. 14. On receipt of a complaint where legal action is being taken, or the police are involved, the Government expects discussions to take place with the relevant authority (legal advisors, police, Crown Prosecution Service), to determine whether progressing the complaint might prejudice subsequent legal or judicial action. If so, the complaint will be put on hold, and the complainant will be advised of this. If not, an investigation into the complaint should commence. 15. If the Chief Executive or Complaints Manager considers the complaint may lead to litigation, advice should be sought from the Trust s legal advisors. When there is a concurrent investigation i.e. legal or disciplinary proceeding or referral to the Police or other statuary body, the Trust will consider how the complaint should be handled and will only proceed where it believes that its investigation would not compromise or prejudice the concurrent investigation. 16. If, throughout the above process, a complainant indicates either in writing or verbally that they intend to take legal action, the Claims Manager will be informed of the complainant s intention by the Complaints Manager. 17. A master file should be retained for a period of up to ten years in line with guidance. The file should incorporate all the relevant information and should be easily accessible upon request How joint complaints are handled between organisations In the event of a highly complex complaint, for example where the complaint relates to a number of different NHS services or organisations, one identified lead organisation will coordinate a response to the complaint following discussion and agreement between the relevant Complaints Managers. Each NHS organisation has a duty to co-operate/duty of co-ordinated handling, in relation to complaints. If there are valid reasons why this may not be possible, e.g. if it will unduly delay the response, the complainant should be informed and it is there decision whether they have a joint or separate response. See Appendix C. Page 16 of 45
17 Rotherham and Doncaster Protocol for Handling NHS/Social Services Inter-Agency Complaints. 5.2 Policy and Procedure for Dealing with Formal Complaints Stage II Referral to the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) If a complainant remains dissatisfied and the Trust believes it has taken all reasonable steps to resolve the complaint, the complainant should be advised of their right to refer their complaint to the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman. 5.3 Procedure for complaints concerning Local Authority services which have been integrated with RDASH services Where Local Authority services, eg Social Workers, are employed by the Local Authority but who form an integrated part of an RDASH team and are managed by that team, any complaints received about these services should in the first instance be dealt with using this policy. Following investigation and response, if the complainant is dissatisfied and the complaint clearly refers to functions of Local Authority Social Services which have been delegated to the Trust, a review under the relevant Local Authority complaints procedure should be invoked. Should the complaint remain unresolved following the Local Authority review, complainants should be advised to write to the Local Government Ombudsman. Complaints which clearly relate to the functions of Local Authority Social Services which have been delegated to the Trust will be copied to the relevant Local Authority for monitoring purposes. 5.4 Importance of Good Communication and Engaging All Stakeholders Many complaints by service users are rooted in communication failures, and these can be exacerbated by (but not exclusively) predisposing conditions of service users such as physical disabilities, medical conditions, anxiety, fear, bereavement, psychological withdrawal, and unfamiliar environments. Good communication skills are vital therefore in avoiding the occurrence of complaints and also the resolution of such concerns. Members of Trust staff are frequently able to resolve many concerns as soon as they arise by utilising such communication skills. Whilst many minor concerns may be immediately resolved, these issues should still communicated to the appropriate Service Manager for their consideration. This is so that they are able to assess the remedial action taken to resolve the complaint and also take reparative action to avoid a re-occurrence of the situation. There are a wide variety of ways in which service users are able to give their opinion, including service user groups, and these should be utilised by services to address any concerns immediately, wherever possible. Page 17 of 45
18 Each member of Trust staff has a responsibility to communicate effectively and sensitively to all service users and carers. Where language creates a barrier, staff have access to interpretation services. See Policy for provision of, access to and use of interpreters. It is a requirement that service users have access to (as frequent as is reasonable) adequate explanations about their care and treatment. All front line staff play a crucial role in undertaking this task. However, service users should also be able to discuss matters of concern with their consultant, other senior clinician or service manager should they wish to do so. The Trust operates an opinion/suggestion scheme called Your Opinion Counts. This invites feedback from service users and carers. This scheme acts as a conduit to improve services by addressing service user and carer concerns; it also provides positive feedback to Trust staff when compliments are made. However, when a formal complaint is raised via the Your Opinion Counts form, it must be dealt with promptly as set out in this policy Links with the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) The PALS Coordinator is available to discuss any comments and concerns with service users and is also able to provide a range of information on associated support services. However, the PALS should only be utilised for quick-fix/on-the-spot resolution to any minor concerns. Any continued dissatisfaction expressed by service users should be referred to the Complaints Manager. The Trust works with the principle that the earlier the concern is mutually resolved the less need there would be to progress to a complaint, claim or litigation Unreasonably persistent complainants The difficulty in handling unreasonably persistent complainants can place a strain on time and resources and cause unacceptable stress for staff. NHS staff are trained to respond with patience and understanding to the needs of all complainants, but there are times when there is nothing further that can reasonably be done to assist them or to rectify a real or perceived problem. In determining arrangements for handling such complainants staff should identify the stage at which a complainant has become unreasonably persistent but also recognise that even persistent complainants may have issues which contain some substance. The need to ensure an equitable approach is, therefore, crucial. This procedure should only be used as a last resort and after all reasonable measures have been taken, ie all efforts to resolve complaints following the NHS complaints procedures have been exhausted. This procedure should only be implemented following careful consideration by, and with authorisation of, the Trust's Chair and Chief Executive or nominated deputy and subsequently ratified by the Trust Board through the confidential agenda. Definition of Unreasonably Persistent Complaints / and or requests for information Page 18 of 45
19 Complainants and/or anyone acting on their behalf may be deemed to be unreasonably persistent where current or previous contact with them shows that they have met two or more (or are in serious breach of one) of the following criteria:- Persisting in pursuing a complaint where the NHS complaints procedure has been fully and properly implemented and exhausted. For example, where investigation is deemed to be 'out of time' or where the Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman has declined a request for independent review Changing the substance of a complaint or persistently raising new issues or seeking to prolong contact by unreasonably raising further concerns or questions upon receipt of a response whilst the complaint is being dealt with. Care must be taken not to disregard new issues, which differ significantly from the original complaint. These may need to be addressed separately. Unwilling to accept documented evidence of treatment given as being factual, e.g. manual or computer records, or deny receipt of an adequate response despite correspondence specifically answering their questions/concerns. This also includes those persons who do not accept that the facts can sometimes be difficult to verify after a long period of time has elapsed. Focusing on a trivial matter to an extent, which is out of proportion to its significance and continue to focus on this point. It should be recognised that determining what is trivial can be subjective and careful judgement must be used in applying this criterion. Physical violence has been used or threatened towards staff or their families/associates at any time. This will, in itself, cause personal contact to be discontinued and will thereafter, only be pursued through written communication. All such incidents should be documented and reported using the Trust s Incident Policy, and notified as appropriate, to the police. The complainant has had an excessive number of contacts with the Trust when pursuing their complaint, placing unreasonable demands on staff. Such contacts may be in person, by telephone, letter, fax or electronically. Discretion must be exercised in deciding how many contacts are required to qualify as excessive, using judgement based on the specific circumstances of each individual case. The complainant has harassed or been abusive or verbally aggressive on more than one occasion towards staff - directly or in-directly - or their families and/or associates. If the nature of the harassment or aggressive behaviour is sufficiently serious, this could, in itself, be sufficient reason for classifying the complainant as unreasonably persistent. Staff must recognise that complainants may sometimes act out of character at times of stress, anxiety or distress and should make reasonable allowances for this. All incidents of harassment or aggression must be documented in accordance with the Trust s Incident Reporting Policy. The complainant is known to have electronically recorded meetings or conversations without the prior knowledge and consent of the other parties involved. It may be necessary to explain to a complainant at the outset of any Page 19 of 45
20 investigation into their complaint that such behaviour is unacceptable and can, in some circumstances, be illegal. Display unreasonable demands or expectations and fail to accept that these may be unreasonable once a clear explanation is provided to them as to what constitutes an unreasonable demand, i.e. insisting on responses to complaints being provided more urgently than is reasonable or recognised practice, presenting similar or substantially similar requests for information. Options for Dealing with Unreasonably Persistent Complainants and/ or Persons requesting information When complainants have been identified as unreasonably persistent, in accordance with the above criteria, the Chair and Chief Executive (or their nominated deputy) will decide what action to take. The Chief Executive (or deputy/representative) will implement such action and notify the individual(s) promptly, and in writing, the reasons why they have been classified as unreasonably persistent and the action to be taken. This notification must be copied, for the information, to others involved in the complaint, eg practitioners, advocates, Independent Complaints Advocacy Service, Member of Parliament, etc. Records must be kept, for future reference, of the reasons why the decision has been made to classify as unreasonably persistent and the action taken. The Chair and Chief Executive (or delegated deputies/representatives) may decide to deal with unreasonably persistent complainants in one or more of the following ways: Once it is clear that one or more of the criteria in section 3 has been seriously breached, it may be appropriate to inform the individuals, in writing, that they are at risk of being classified as unreasonably persistent. A copy of this procedure should be sent to them and they should be advised to take account of the criteria in any future dealings with the Trust and its staff. The complainant should be advised that they can seek advice from the Independent Complaints Advocacy Service or the Parliamentary Health Services Ombudsman with regard to taking their complaint further. The Trust should try to resolve the complaint before invoking this procedure by drawing up a signed agreement with the complainant, involving the relevant staff if appropriate, setting out a code of behaviour for the parties involved. If this agreement is breached, consideration would then be given to implementing other actions as outlined below. The Trust can decline further contact either in person, by telephone, fax, letter or electronically, or any combination of these, provided that one form of contact is maintained. Alternatively, a further contact could be restricted to liaison through a third party. A suggested statement has been prepared for use if staff need to withdraw from a telephone conversation. This is shown in the attached staff operational guidance. Notify complainants in writing that the Chairman or Chief Executive (or delegated deputies/representatives) has responded fully to the complaint, has exhausted local Page 20 of 45
21 resolution, and that continuing contact on the complaint will serve no useful purpose. This notification should state that that no further correspondence will be sent and that further communications will not responded to. Inform complainants that in extreme circumstances the Trust reserves the right to refer unreasonably persistent complaints to the organisation s solicitors/the Information Commissioner and/or the police. Temporarily suspend all contact, whilst seeking legal advice or guidance. Withdrawing Unreasonably Persistent Status Once classified as unreasonably persistent, this status may be withdrawn if, for example, a more reasonable approach is subsequently demonstrated or if they submit a further complaint for which the normal complaints procedures would be appropriate. Staff should use careful judgement and discretion in recommending or confirming that unreasonably persistent status should be withdrawn. Discussions should be held with the Chairman and Chief Executive (or their delegated deputies/representatives) and, subject to their approval, normal contact and procedures will be resumed. Monitoring Applications will be reported and monitored through the Risk Management Sub Group and reported to the Board of Directors by exception by the Executive Director of Business Assurance. Staff Guidance for Handling Habitual or Unreasonably Persistent Complainants The following form of words or a very close approximation should be used by any member of staff who intends to withdraw from a telephone conversation with a complainant. Grounds for doing so could be that the complainant has become unreasonably aggressive, abusive, insulting or threatening to the individual dealing with the call or in respect of other NHS personnel. It should not be used to avoid dealing with a complainant's legitimate questions / concerns which can sometimes be expressed extremely strongly. Careful judgement and discretion must be used in determining whether or not a complainant's approach has become unreasonable. FORM OF WORDS "I am afraid that we have reached the point where your approach has become unreasonable and I have no alternative but to discontinue this conversation. Your complaint(s) will still be dealt with by the Trust in accordance with the NHS complaints procedure. I am now going to put the telephone down but wish to assure you that the situation will shortly be confirmed in writing to you." FOLLOW-UP ACTION The incident should immediately be reported to the Complaints Manager and the Head of Patient Safety and Experience and agreement reached on future means of Page 21 of 45
COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE
COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE Last Review Date April 2014 Approving Body Governing Body Date of Approval April 2014 Date of Implementation May 2014 Next Review Date November 2015 Review Responsibility
More informationNHS England Complaints Policy
NHS England Complaints Policy 1 2 NHS England Complaints Policy NHS England Policy and Corporate Procedures Version number: 1.1 First published: September 2014 Prepared by: Kerry Thompson, Senior Customer
More informationNHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group. Customer care and complaints policy
NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group Customer care and complaints policy Supporting people in Dorset to lead healthier lives PREFACE This policy sets out the mandatory framework for managing all comments,
More informationNHS SOUTH DEVON AND TORBAY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMPLAINTS POLICY
NHS SOUTH DEVON AND TORBAY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMPLAINTS POLICY Version: 1.4 dated 26 March 2014 DATE VERSION CONTROL 01/08/2013 1.0 First draft Phil Stimpson Based upon initial policy produced
More informationPolicy and Procedure for Handling and Learning from Feedback, Comments, Concerns and Complaints
Policy and Procedure for Handling and Learning from Feedback, Comments, Concerns and Complaints Author: Shona Welton, Head of Patient Affairs Responsible Lead Executive Director: Endorsing Body: Governance
More informationComplaints Policy and Procedure
First issued by/date Issue Version Purpose of Issue/Description of Change Sept 2013 7 This policy has been reviewed and updated in line with planned review date. Planned Review Date October 2018 Named
More informationContents. Appendices. 1. Complaints Relating to Commissioned Services Page 15
COMPLAINTS POLICY 1 Contents 1. Introduction Page 3 2. Purpose Page 3 3. Principles Page 4 4. Scope Page 4 5. Exclusions Page 5 6. Responsibilities Page 5 7. Complaints Management Process: Local Resolution
More informationContents. Section/Paragraph Description Page Number
- NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICAL NON CLINICA CLINICAL NON CLINICAL - CLINICAL CLINICAL Complaints Policy Incorporating Compliments, Comments,
More informationPolicy Document Control Page
Policy Document Control Page Title Title: Complaints and Compliments Policy Version: 10 Reference Number: CO3 Supersedes Supersedes: Version 9 Description of Amendment(s): Amendment of review date to reflect
More informationNHS CHOICES COMPLAINTS POLICY
NHS CHOICES COMPLAINTS POLICY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS: INTRODUCTION... 5 DEFINITIONS... 5 Complaint... 5 Concerns and enquiries (Incidents)... 5 Unreasonable or Persistent Complainant... 5 APPLICATIONS...
More informationRatification by: Haringey CCG Governing Body (is on agenda for March 2013 meeting)
NHS Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy V1 Approved by: Haringey CCG Quality Committee (29/01/13) Ratification by: Haringey CCG Governing Body (is on agenda for March 2013 meeting)
More informationPOLICY & PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLIMENTS, PALS ENQUIRIES AND COMPLAINTS INCLUDING UNREASONABLE OR PERSISTENT COMPLAINANTS
POLICY & PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLIMENTS, PALS ENQUIRIES AND COMPLAINTS INCLUDING UNREASONABLE OR PERSISTENT COMPLAINANTS APPROVED BY: South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Quality
More informationCOMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY Compliance with all CCG policies, procedures, protocols, guidelines, guidance and standards is a condition of employment. Breach of policy may result in disciplinary action.
More informationComplaints Policy. Complaints Policy. Page 1
Complaints Policy Page 1 Complaints Policy Policy ref no: CCG 006/14 Author (inc job Kat Tucker Complaints & FOI Manager title) Date Approved 25 November 2014 Approved by CCG Governing Body Date of next
More informationChesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust THE ADVICE CENTRE AND COMPLAINTS POLICY
Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust THE ADVICE CENTRE AND COMPLAINTS POLICY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The aim of the Advice Centre is to support the Trust s Service Experience Strategy by providing
More informationPolicy and Procedure on Complaints Management
Policy and Procedure on Complaints Management Policy approved by: Board June 2005, Dec 2006, Jan 2007 Review date: May 2010 Next review date: May 2013 Policy approved by: NHS Rotherham Board, May 2010
More informationCOMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE TWC7
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE TWC7 Version: 3.0 Ratified by: Complaints Group Date ratified: July 2011 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/ individual: Date issued: July 2011 Review
More informationBerkshire West Clinical Commissioning Groups
Berkshire West Clinical Commissioning Groups Corporate Policy 1 (CP1) CCG Policy for the Handling of Complaints Version: 1 Ratified by: Date ratified: April 2013 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible
More informationPolicies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Complaints and Compliments Policy Trust Ref No 1353-29025 Local Ref (optional) N/A Main points the document This policy and procedure
More informationGUIDANCE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINTS. Director of Nursing and Quality. Patient Experience and Customer Services Manager
REFERENCE NUMBER: IN-007 GUIDANCE FOR RESPONDING TO COMPLAINTS AREA: NAME OF RESPONSIBLE COMMITTEE / INDIVIDUAL NAME OF ORIGINATOR / AUTHOR Trust Wide Director of Nursing and Quality Patient Experience
More informationThe State Hospital s Board for Scotland
The State Hospital s Board for Scotland PATIENT & CARER FEEDBACK Procedure for Feedback; Comments, Concerns, Compliments and Complaints (Incorporating the NHS Can I Help you Guidance) Policy Reference
More informationComplaints Policy and Procedure. Contents. Title: Number: Version: 1.0
Title: Complaints Policy and Procedure Number: Version: 1.0 Contents 1 Purpose and scope... 2 2 Responsibilities... 2 3 Policy Statement: Aims and Objectives... 4 4 Definition of a complaint... 4 5 Procedure...
More informationPrinciples of Good Complaint Handling
Principles of Good Complaint Handling Principles of Good Complaint Handling Good complaint handling means: 1 Getting it right 2 Being customer focused 3 Being open and accountable 4 Acting fairly and proportionately
More informationPolicies and Procedures. Policy on the Handling of Complaints
RMP. South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust Policies and Procedures Policy on the Handling of Complaints Approved by Trust Board December 2006 (revised version approved by RMEC May 2010) Policy Type Policy
More informationPOLICY CONTROL DOCUMENT - 2
POLICY CONTROL DOCUMENT - 2 NUMBER OF PAGES (EXCLUDING APPENDICES) 8 SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: 22 nd December 2011 Sections removed from policy and placed as Appendix which include the following: Responsibilities
More informationCCG CO02 Complaints Policy and Procedure
Corporate CCG CO02 Complaints Policy and Procedure Version Number Date Issued Review Date V3: 16/01/2016 01/12/2016 Prepared By: Senior Clinical Quality Officer, NECS Complaints Team. Consultation Process:
More informationCOMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY A GENERAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This policy sets out the process that the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG) will use for handling complaints, generated by patients, carers
More informationCOMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES Clinical Governance & Risk Management Department Policy elibrary Reference: Date of Issue: May 2010 Prepared by: Patient Focus Manager Date of Review: April 2012 Lead Reviewer:
More informationCO02: COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE
Policy Type Information Governance Corporate Standing Operating Procedure Human Resources X Policy Name CO02: COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Status Committee approved by Final Governing Body Date Approved
More informationCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURE
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE AUGUST 2004 Revised July 1996 Revised March 1997 Revised November 1997 Revised May 1998 Revised November 1998 Revised July 1999 Revised May 2002 Revised March 2004 Revised June 2004
More informationCOMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY
COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS POLICY A GENERAL 1. INTRODUCTION This policy sets out the process for handling complaints, generated by patients, carers and the general public, by the Clinical Commissioning Group
More informationNHS Complaints Handling: Briefing Note. The standard NHS complaints procedure can be used for most complaints about NHS services.
APPENDIX 1 NHS Complaints Handling: Briefing Note NHS Complaints Procedure The standard NHS complaints procedure can be used for most complaints about NHS services. The legislation governing the NHS complaints
More informationCustomer Services (Enquiries/Concerns/Complaints) Framework 2012/13
Customer Services (Enquiries/Concerns/Complaints) Framework 2012/13 Version: One Responsible Committee: The Audit & Governance Group Date approved: Name of author: JANET SMART Name of responsible director/
More informationCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURE. Version: 1.4. Date Approved November 2014. Interim Complaints Manager. Date issued: November 2014
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE Version: 1.4 Committee Approved by: Integrated Governance Committee Date Approved November 2014 Author: Responsible Directorate: Interim Complaints Manager Finance and Governance Date
More informationNHS Newark and Sherwood Clinical Commissioning Group. Quality & Patient Safety Directorate Complaints and Concerns Policy and Procedure
NHS Newark and Sherwood Clinical Commissioning Group Quality & Patient Safety Directorate Complaints and Concerns Policy and Procedure Review Date September 2016 1 Complaints and Concerns Handling Policy
More informationComplaints Framework 2014/15
Complaints Framework 2014/15 NHS Greater Huddersfield CCG Complaints Framework 2014-15 v1.0 July 2014 1 Version: 1.0 Responsible Committee: Quality And Safety Committee Date approved: 23 July 2014 Name
More informationManagement agement of Complai. nts, Concerns, Comments
Policy: C1 Management agement of Complai nts, Concerns, Comments & Com pliments Po licy Version: C1 / 09 Ratified by: TMT Date ratified: 12 th December 2012 Title of Author: Title of responsible Director
More informationPOLICY FOR THE REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT COMPLAINTS
Item 9 POLICY FOR THE REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT OF PATIENT COMPLAINTS Authorship: Chief Operating Officer Approved date: 20 September 2012 Approved Governing Body Review Date: April 2013 Equality Impact
More informationHigh Oak Surgery Complaints Policy Document Description Lead Author(s) Change History Document complies with the Equality Act 2010
High Oak Surgery Complaints Policy Document Description Document Type CQC Standard 7 Service Application Version 2 Ratification Date Target Group All staff Last Reviewed October 2012 Next Review Date October
More informationComplaints Policy. Version: 4 Ratified by: Board Date ratified: 15 th July 2015. All Lincolnshire Community Health Services staff
Complaints Policy Reference No: P_CIG_08 Version: 4 Ratified by: Lincolnshire Community Health Services Trust Board Date ratified: 15 th July 2015 Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
More informationComplaints Policy (Listening, Responding and Learning from Views and Concerns)
(Listening, Responding and Learning from Views and Concerns) Version 1.0 Ratified By Date Ratified 14 th November 2012 Author(s) Responsible Committee / Officers Date Issue 1 st April 2013 Review Date
More informationComplaints Policy and Procedure
Complaints Policy and Procedure REFERENCE NUMBER DraftAug2012V1MH APPROVING COMMITTEE(S) AND DATE THIS DOCUMENT REPLACES REVIEW DUE DATE March 2014 RATIFICATION DATE/DRAFT No NHS West Lancashire Clinical
More informationCompliments, Comments, Concerns and Complaints Policy and Procedure
Compliments, Comments, Concerns and Complaints Policy and Procedure Version: 1.5 Responsible Committee: Clinical Quality & Governance Committee Date approved: Name of author: Amrit Reyat, Complaints Manager
More informationCustomer Relations Director of Nursing. Customer Relations Manager All staff
COMPLAINTS POLICY Summary statement: How does the document support patient care? Staff/stakeholders involved in development: Job titles only Division: Department: Responsible Person: The policy aims to
More informationRedbridge. CCG Complaints Handling Policy
Redbridge CCG Complaints Handling Policy Contents 1.1 Purpose and Approach... 3 1.2 How to read this document... 3 1.3 The role of the CCGs... 3 2. Responsibilities... 4 2.1 Definition of a complaint...
More informationBurton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Committee On: 20 January 2015. Review Date: September 2017. Department Responsible for Review:
POLICY DOCUMENT Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Approved by: Executive Management Committee On: 20 January 2015 Review Date: September 2017 Corporate / Division Corporate
More informationCOMPLAINTS PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
COMPLAINTS PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES POLICY/PROCEDURE NUMBER: CPG2 VERSION NUMBER: 4 AUTHOR: Pam Madison Head of Complaints & Customer Service Improvement CONSULTATION GROUPS: Complaints Review Group, Service
More informationDevon County Council. Children & Young Peoples Services Directorate. Complaints & Representations Policy
Devon County Council Children & Young Peoples Services Directorate Complaints & Representations Policy Created April 2008-amended Sept 2009 1 Index 1. Introduction 2. Legislative Background and National
More informationTitle: Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust Q42: Complaints Procedure. Version 03 Page 1 of 20
Title: Complaints Procedure Outcome Statement: Staff will follow Trust procedures for investigating and responding to complaints Written By: Michael Lozano, Patient Safety & Complaints Lead Reviewed by:
More informationComments, Concerns, Complaints and Compliments Policy
Comments, Concerns, Complaints and Compliments Policy Policy ID CG05 Version: 1.2 Date ratified by Governing Body 29/11/13 Author Suzi Shettle, Head of Communications and Engagement Last review date: November
More informationComplaints Handling Policy Incorporating Complaints, Concerns and Compliments Version 5.0
Complaints Handling Policy Incorporating Complaints, Concerns and Compliments Version 5.0 Purpose: For use by: This document is compliant with /supports compliance with: To advise and inform hospital staff
More informationCOMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS & COMPLIMENTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE
COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS & COMPLIMENTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Version: Approved by: Date approved: Date ratified by Governing Body: Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
More informationHANDLING COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE
HANDLING COMPLAINTS POLICY & PROCEDURE This policy can be made available in other formats and languages upon request to the PALS office on 01708 435454 Content includes: Principles of Complaints Management
More informationComplaints that are not required to be considered under the arrangements
Under the provisions of the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 2005 pharmacy contractors are required to have in place arrangements, for the handling and consideration of complaints
More informationGoverning Body 13 November 2013
Paper 07 Governing Body 13 November 2013 Overview of complaints and handling processes Paper Author Lead Executive FOI status Michaela Maloney, Interim Head of Communication and Engagement Brendan Ward,
More informationCOMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY. Compliments, Concerns and Complaints Policy
Document information COMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY Document type: Document reference Document title: Policy TBC Compliments, Concerns and Complaints Policy Document operational date: 25 th
More informationComplaints. It is also important to learn from complaints in order to prevent or minimise the risk of similar problems happening again.
6 Complaints Even the most careful and competent dental professional is likely to receive a complaint about the quality of the service, care or treatment they have provided, at some point in their career.
More informationValidation Date: 29/11/2013. Ratified Date: 14/01/2014. Review dates may alter if any significant changes are made
Document Type: PROCEDURE Title: Complaints Management Scope: Trust Wide Author/Originator and title: Eleanor Carter, Patient Experience Facilitator Paul Jebb, Assistant Director of Nursing (Patient Experience)
More information1.1. A health service that does not listen to complaints is unlikely to reflect its patients needs. Robert Francis QC
Review Circulation Application Ratification Author Minor Amendment Supersedes Title DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE Title: Interim Complaints Policy Version: 5 Reference Number: Supersedes: Version 4 (Complaints
More informationConcern / Complaints Flowchart
Concern / Complaints Flowchart INFORMAL CONCERN (usually verbal) A concern can be made to any member of staff or the Patient Advice and Liaison Service Staff/PALS will try to resolve the issue within 1
More informationComments, Compliments and Complaints Policy. Document Title NTW(O)07. Reference Number. Medical Director. Lead Officer
Document Title Reference Number Comments, Compliments and Complaints Policy NTW(O)07 Lead Officer Medical Director Author(s) (name and designation) Ratified by Keeley Brickle Complaints and PALS Manager
More informationSTATE HOSPITAL QUALITY PROCEDURES MANUAL
APPROVED BY: PAGE: Page 1 of 8 1.0 Purpose To define a complaints procedure which is as transparent, fair and impartial as possible to all users and providers of the services undertaken by the State Hospital.
More informationMaking Experiences Count Procedure
Making Experiences Count Procedure When a mistake happens, it is important to acknowledge it, put things right quickly and learn from the experience. Listening, Responding, Improving A guide to better
More informationCOMPLAINTS HANDLING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
COMPLAINTS HANDLING POLICY AND PROCEDURE Primary Intranet Location Version Number Next Review Year Next Review Month Complaints V.5 2015 July Current Author Author s Job Title Department Ratifying Committee
More informationCompliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure. September 2014
Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure September 2014 The current version of all policies can be accessed at the NHS Sheffield CCG Intranet site http://www.intranet.sheffieldccg.nhs.uk/ VERSION
More informationDocument Title Service Experience Desk (SED) Policy Managing Complaints and Informal Enquiries
Document Title Service Experience Desk (SED) Policy Managing Complaints and Informal Enquiries Document Description Document Type Policy Service Application Trust Wide Version 3.3 Reference Number POL
More informationGuidance on a Model Complaints Handling Procedure
Guidance on a Model Complaints Handling Procedure Scottish Public Services Ombudsman This document is available on request in other languages and formats (such as large print or Braille). SPSO Guidance
More informationCustomer Feedback Management Policy
Customer Feedback Management Policy Version 2.0 Table of Contents 1 Document Control... 3 1.1 Document Information... 3 1.2 Document History... 3 1.3 Scheduled amendments... 3 1.4 Document Approvals...
More informationMANAGEMENT OF COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY. Documentation Control
MANAGEMENT OF COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY Documentation Control Reference GG/CM/002 Date approved Approving Body Trust Board Implementation date Supersedes Patient and Carer Feedback
More informationPolicy and Procedure for the Recording, Investigation and Management of Complaints, Comments, Concerns and Compliments (4C Model)
CWHH Clinical Commissioning Group 15 Marylebone Road London NW1 5JD Tel: 020 3350 4177 Policy and Procedure for the Recording, Investigation and Management of Complaints, Comments, Concerns and Compliments
More informationGlasgow Life. Comments, Compliments and Complaints Policy
Glasgow Life Comments, Compliments and Complaints Policy 1. Introduction Glasgow Life is committed to delivering high quality services that enriches the lives of all of Glasgow's citizens and visitors
More informationRevised Complaints Policy OP08 Director of Nursing and Midwifery Complaints Management Co-ordinator
RROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON HOSPITALS NHS TRUST AGENDA ITEM NO: 10a Report to: Trust Board Date: 22 nd June 2009 Subject Report By Author Revised Complaints Policy OP08 Director of Nursing and Midwifery Complaints
More informationCOMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES
COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURES CONTENTS 1 POLICY... 3 2 BACKGROUND... 3 2.1 RATIONALE... 3 2.2 RELATED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES... 4 2.3 KEY DEFINITIONS... 5 2.4 PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE POLICY...
More informationCarolyn McConnell, Head of Patient Experience Tel: (0151) 529 5530 Email: carolyn.mcconnell@thewaltoncentre.nhs.uk. Document Type: POLICY Version 2.
Complaints Policy Author and Contact details: Responsible Director: Carolyn McConnell, Head of Tel: (0151) 529 5530 Email: carolyn.mcconnell@thewaltoncentre.nhs.uk Director of Strategy & Planning Approved
More informationCustomer Care Policy and Procedure for Managing Complaints, Concerns, Comments and Compliments
Customer Care Policy and Procedure for Managing Complaints, Concerns, Comments and Compliments Responsible Director: Author and Contact Details: HR & Governance Director Customer Care Team Manager Tel:
More informationCOMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES
COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES First issued by/date Wirral PCT November 2006 Issue Version Purpose of Issue/Description of Change 3 Revised update to unify procedure across Local Authority Social Services
More informationHow To Write A Complaint Policy And Procedure For The Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group
Northumberland Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy and Procedure Author Steph Edusei-Basra, Authorisation Development Lead Owner Alistair Blair, Chief Clinical Officer (designate) Date: 10 August
More informationPolicy for handling formal complaints (CG009)
Policy for handling formal complaints (CG009) Approval and Authorisation Approval Group Job Title, Chair of Committee Date Executive Committee Chief Executive Officer, Chair of Executive Committee Change
More informationComplaints - Integrated Policy and Procedures for Health & Adult Social Care. Making Experiences Count
Complaints - Integrated Policy and Procedures for Health & Adult Social Care Making Experiences Count NHS Swindon is the brand name for the organisation legally known as Swindon Primary Care Trust Note:
More informationCOMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY. Compliments, Concerns and Complaints
COMPLIMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY Document information Document type: Document reference: Document title: Policy Compliments, Concerns and Complaints Policy Document operational date: 1 st February
More informationComplaints, Comments & Compliments Policy
Complaints, Comments & Compliments Policy 1. INTRODUCTION We welcome our customers views and will use them to improve our services. The purpose of this policy is to provide a framework for dealing with
More informationCAUTION: You must refer to the intranet for the most recent version of this policy. Complaints Policy. General. General. Complaint, issue.
Complaints Policy SharePoint location Clinical Policies and Guidelines SharePoint Index Directory General Sub Area General Key words (for search purposes) Complaint, issue Central Index No 0138 v3 Endorsing
More informationClaim Management Policy
Claim Management Policy REFERENCE NUMBER Claim management policy VERSION V1.0 APPROVING COMMITTEE & DATE Clinical Executive Committee REVIEW DUE DATE May 2018 1 West Lancashire CCG is committed to ensuring
More informationBeing Open Policy P033. Version Date Revision Description Editor Status
Document Information Board Library Reference Document Author Assured By Review Cycle P033 Head of Risk & Compliance Quality & Healthcare Governance 3 Years Note: This document is electronically controlled.
More informationCOMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY
COMPLAINTS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS AND COMPLIMENTS POLICY A GENERAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Portsmouth Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) is committed to providing an accessible, equitable and effective means
More informationThe Fostering Network 2006 Managing Allegations and Serious Concerns About Foster Carers Practice: a guide for fostering services.
1 foreword The role of foster carers is a unique and challenging one. They look after some of our most vulnerable children, 24 hours a day, and it is essential that they are properly supported. The way
More informationPALS and complaints policy
PALS and complaints policy NOTE: This is a CONTROLLED document. The current version of this document is maintained and is always available electronically from SharePoint or the intranet. All other electronic
More informationComplaints Policy. Version: 1.1. NHS Bury Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body. Ratified by: Date ratified: 27 th March 2013
Version: 1.1 Ratified by: NHS Bury Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Date ratified: 27 th March 2013 Name of originator /author (s): Responsible Committee / individual: Gareth Webb Quality and
More informationComplaints Policy. Version: 1. Approved by group/committee and Date: Quality and Governance Committee September 2014
Complaints Policy Version: 1 Status: Title of originator/author: Name of responsible director: Approved by group/committee and Date: Effective date of issue: (1 month after approval date) Approved Senior
More informationNHS Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group. Complaints Policy V0.7. Ratification by: Barnet CCG Governing Body March 2013. Review date: August 2013
NHS Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints Policy V0.7 Ratification by: Barnet CCG Governing Body March 2013 Review date: August 2013 Version control Version Date Information 0.1 23.01.2013 0.4
More informationComplaints Policy. Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 6 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead: Approved By:
Complaints Policy CONTROLLED DOCUMENT CATEGORY: CLASSIFICATION: PURPOSE Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 6 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead: Approved By: Policy Governance
More informationCOMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT NGH/PO/016
COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT NGH/PO/016 Ratified By: Procedural Documents Group Date Ratified: October 2009 Date(s) Reviewed: August 2009 Next Review Date: August 2011 Version No: 3 Responsibility for Review:
More informationGuide to to good handling of complaints for CCGs. CCGs. May 2013. April 2013 1
Guide to to good handling of complaints for CCGs CCGs May 2013 April 2013 1 NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Commissioning Development Publications Gateway Reference: 00087 Document Purpose
More informationFairness at Work (Grievance Policy & Procedure)
Fairness at Work (Grievance Policy & Procedure) Publication Scheme Y/N Department of Origin Policy Holder Author Related Documents Can be Published on Force Website HR Operations Head of HR Operations
More informationDOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE. Summary of amendments: See Summary of Amendments Page 2
DOCUMENT CONTROL PAGE Title: Complaints, Concerns and Compliments Policy Version: Draft 0.11 January 2016 Reference Number: Supersedes: Version 5.1 Interim Complaints Policy Date: January 2016 Notified
More informationPolicy for the Management of Concerns and Complaints
Policy for the Management of Concerns and Complaints Ratification process Lead Author Developed by: Approved by: Patient Experience Manager, C&P CCG Patient Experience Manager, C&P CCG Patient Safety &
More informationNHS FORTH VALLEY. COMPLAINT POLICY and PROCEDURE. T Horne, Complaint Manager
NHS FORTH VALLEY COMPLAINT POLICY and PROCEDURE Author: T Horne, Complaint Manager 1. Background 1.1. NHS Forth Valley is a learning, patient-focused organisation that welcomes feedback from users of its
More informationCOMPLIMENTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES
COMPLIMENTS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURES Lead Responsible: Responsible Person: Review Date: Document type: Date Issued: Ratified by: Reference: Version Helen Hirst - Director
More informationGENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE
GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES COMPLAINTS POLICY AND PROCEDURE Version 1.0 Page 1 of 65 November 2013 POLICY DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL CERTIFICATE TITLE Title: General Policies and Procedures: Complaints
More informationDate of review: January 2015. Policy Category: Governance CONTENTS:
Title: Patient Complaints Handling Policy Date Approved: 18 January 2012 Approved by: Executive Management Committee Date of review: January 2015 Policy Ref: Issue: 3 Division/Department: Corporate / Improving
More information