How To Get A Garnisment On An Inerited Ir
|
|
- Phoebe Simpson
- 3 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Valdivia v. Valdivia, %13 SO.2c Page So.2d Fla. L. Weekly D514 Isabel VALDIVIA, Appellant, v. Ester Fajardo VALDIVIA, Appellee. No District Court of Appeal of Florida, Tird District. Feb. 18, Page 1191 Raquel Puig Zaldivar; Nancy Scleifer, for appellant. Lucrecia Granda, for appellee. Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, n. PER CURIAM. Appellant Isabel Valdivia, te ex-wife of decedent, Jose Valdivia, M.D., claims te remainder of er lump sum alimony against is estate. Se argues tat te only substantial asset owned by te doctor from te time of te couple's 1985 divorce until te doctor's deat in 1990 was is successful medical practice, Belo Medical Center, and tat tis asset was fraudulently conveyed to defeat er claim. Finding appellant ad failed to state a cause of action for fraudulent conveyance, te trial court denied er petition to void te conveyance and denied er motion to declare te Center part of te estate. We reverse upon te following analysis. Appellant's petition alleged tat at te time of te dissolution of te couple's long-term marriage, te trial judge made a finding tat during te marriage te doctor ad developed te Center and ad been 100% owner of all Center stock until six years earlier wen e transferred 25% of te stock to is friend Ester Fajardo. Te court found tat te Center provided te doctor wit income in excess of $150,000 per year. In its final judgment granting dissolution, te court awarded te remaining tastcase 75% interest in te Center to te doctor and awarded appellant lump sum alimony of $250,000 to be paid out in montly installments. Te order provided: g. Te above awards of lump sum alimony sall constitute a claim against te Estate of te Husband Te parties sall fortwit execute any and all documents and take suc oter actions as may be necessary to accomplis and comply wit te terms of tis final judgment. In June 1987, two and one-alf years after te divorce decree, and two weeks prior to is marriage to Fajardo, te doctor transferred is interest in te Center to imself and Fajardo, as joint tenants wit rigt of survivorsip. In April 1990, several weeks before te doctor's deat, Fajardo Valdivia, executed a transfer of te 75% stock interest to erself individually. After te doctor's deat, wen appellant filed a petition for administration, se alleged tat $133, of te lump sum alimony awarded er remained unpaid. Se furter alleged tat at te time of te transfer to joint tenancy, te doctor was aware of appellant's judgment against im, tat te Center was is only significant asset, and tat te transfer, ifupeld, would result in removing tat asset from is estate, tereby leaving insuffcient assets for appellant to collect er judgment. Se alleged tat Fajardo Valdivia, aware tat er spouse owed a large debt to appellant, ten executed te second transfer as bot te Center's president and secretary altoug se was not
2 Va!t1lvia v. Vêddivia, president. Appellant alleged tat te transfers ad taken place in secret and for no consideration, and tat te doctor, up to te time of is deat, ad continued to control te property. We conclude tat te appellant sould ave been permtted to prosecute er petition Page 1192 to void te conveyance as fraudulent. Se submitted evidence tat te lump sum alimony award, wile to be paid in periodic installments, constituted a claim against te estate and tat te parties were ordered to act in accordance wit tat decision. Furter, Fajardo Valdivia's memoranda to te cour in response to te instant petition, admitted tat te property was transferred "to take it from te estate." Te law is clear tat a debtor may not transfer property owned by imself, individually, to imself and is wife as tenants by te entireties if suc a transfer wil defraud creditors by putting tat property beyond te creditors' reac. Wetstone v. Coslick, 117 Fla. 203, 157 So. 666 (1934); Ferre v. City Nat'l Bank, 548 SO.2d 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see Money v. Powell, 139 So.2d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). Appellant's petition to void te transaction suffciently alleged a valid cause of action for fraudulent transfer. Terefore, appellant sould ave been permtted to go forward wit er claim. \ Accordingly, we reverse te trial court's order and remand te case to permt appellant to prosecute er petition to void te conveyance. A lastcase
3 Robertson v. Deeb, 16 SO.3d 936 (Fla. App., 2009) 16 So.3d 936 Ricard A. ROBERTSON, Appellant, v. Kevin J. DEEB and RBC Wealt Management, a Division of RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Appellees. No. 2D District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. August 14,2009. (16 So.3d937) James A. Byrne, St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Teresa A. Deeb of Deeb & Durkin, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee Kevin J. Deeb. No appearance for Appellee RBC Wealt Management. SILBERMAN, Judge. Ricard A. Robertson appeals an order denying is claim of exemption from garnisment wit respect to an inerited IR. We affrm based on our determination tat inerited IRAs are not entitled to te exemption set fort in section (2)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), because tat section is limited to te original "fund or account." Kevin J. Deeb sued Robertson on a promissory note and obtained a judgment against im in excess of $188,000. Deeb tereafter obtained and served a writ of garnisment to RBC Wealt Management, a division of RBC Capital Markets Corporation. In response, RBC identified an account titled "Ricard A(.J Robertson Beneficiary, Harold Robertson Decedent RBC Capital Markets Custodial IR" tat contained $75,372 in cas and securities. Robertson fied a claim of exemption and argued tat te IRA, wic e ad inerited from is fater, was exempt from garnisment pursuant to section (2)(a). At te earing on Robertson's claim of exemption, Robertson relied on a letter and a fact seet from RBC informing Robertson of is rigts to is fater's IR as a beneficiary. Te. fact seet stated tat, upon is fater's deat, 4 fastcase Robertson ad two options. His first option was transferring te account into an inerited IR, wic would require im to accept annual minimum distributions but allow im to take discretionary payouts witout penalty. His second option was accepting distributions pursuant to te "five year deat rule," wic would allow im to take discretionary payouts from is fater's account as long as e exausted te funds witin five years of is fater's deat. Robertson elected to transfer te account into an inerited IRA. 1 Section 222.2l(2)(a) renders "money or oter assets payable to an owner, a participant or a beneficiary" exempt from garnisment if it is in a fund or account tat is (16 So.3d 938J maintained as an IR pursuant to a plan or governing instrument tat is exempt from taxation under certain provisions of te Internal Revenue Code. Te trial court found tat section (2)(a) does not apply to an inerited IR and denied te claim of exemption. Té court reasoned tat at te time of is fater's deat, te account became Robertson's propert and no longer qualified for te same exemptions from taxation. Te court concluded, "It is not an IR. It is not like an IR in terms of taxing and penalty for early witdrawal and tings of tat nature, so I don't tink tat's wat (te legislature J meant." On appeal, Robertson argues tat te court erred in determining tat section 222.2l(2)(a) does not apply because e is a "beneficiary" of te "fund or account" tat qualified as an IR wen is fater was alive. Deeb argues tat te - 1 -
4 Robertson v. Deeb, 16 SO.3d 936 (Fla. App" 2009) trial court's ruling sould be affirmed because IRAs lose teir tax exempt status under section (2)(a) upon te deat of te original owner. We review tis question of law regarding te interpretation of section 222.2l(2)(a) de novo. See BellSout Telecomms., Inc. v. Meeks, 863 SO.2d 287, 289 (Fla.2003). We conclude tat section 222.2l(2)(a) does not apply to inerited IRs because te plain language of tat section references only te original "fund or account" and te tax consequences of inerited IRAs render tem completely separate funds or accounts. Te applicable portion of section (2)(a) provides as follows: (2)(a) Except as provided in paragrap (d), any money or oter assets payable to an owner, a participant, or a beneficiary from, or any interest of any owner, participant, or beneficiary in, a fund or account is exempt from all claims of creditors of te owner, beneficiary, or participant ifte fund or account is: 1. Maintained in accordance wit a master plan, volume submitter plan, prototype plan, or any oter plan or governing instrument tat as been preapproved by te Internal Revenue Service as exempt from taxation under s. 40l(a), s. 403(a), s. 403(b), s. 408, s. 408A, s. 409, s. 414, s. 457(b), or s. 50l(a) of te Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, unless it as been subsequently determined tat te plan or governing instrument is not exempt from taxation in a proceeding tat as become final and nonappealable; 2. Maintained in accordance wit a plan or governing instrument tat as been determined by te Internal Revenue Service to be exempt from taxation under s. 401(a), s. 403(a), s. 403(b), s. 408, s. 408A, s. 409, s. 414, s. 457(b), or s. 50l(a) of te Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, unless it as been subsequently determined tat te plan or governing instrument is not exempt from taxation in a proceeding tat as become final and nonappealable; rastcase (Empasis added and footnotes omitted.) Tus, te plain language of section 222.2l(2)(a) reflects te legislature's intent to exempt a "fund or account" tat is maintained as an IR in accordance wit a plan or governing instrument tat is exempt from taxation under certain provisions of te Code. Wile section (2)(a) pr~vides for exemption from "all claims of creditors of te...beneficiary," it does not exempt te money or. assets at issue unless tey are maintained in one particular "fund or account." Tus, te plain language of section (2)(a) does not exempt inerited IRs, suc as te one Robertson establised in tis case, wic are separate funds or accounts. tat are created wen te original fund or account (16 So.3d 939J passes to a beneficiary upon te deat of te participant. Furtermore, te "fund or account" tat is exempt from garnisment under section (2)(a) is identified by its tax exempt status. However, wen IRs are distributed upon te deat of te owner. and become inerited IRs teir tax exempt status canges dramatically. IRs are generally exempt from income taxes until distributions are taken, and owners may roll over IRAs witout incurring any tax penalties. LR.C. 408(d)(1), (d)(3), (e) (2007). Furtermore, IR owners are not required to take distributions, and tey incur a ten percent penalty for early witdrawal. LR.C. 72(q) (2008), 408(d)(1). Wile inerited IRs are also exempt from income taxes until distributions are taken, beneficiaries of inerited IRAs are required to take distributions wic are exempt from te early witdrawal penalty. LR.C. 72(q)(2)(B); 40 1 (a)(9) (2008); 408(a)(6), (d)(1). Additionally, iilerited IRs are not entitled to rollover treatment. See LR.C. 408(d)(1), (d)(3)(c). Tus, te tax exempt status of inerited IRs is inconsistent wit tat of original IRs. Tis inconsistency as been recognized by a number of federal bankruptcy courts tat ave concluded tat inerited IRs are not exempt - 2-
5 Robertson v. Deeb, 16 SO.3d 936 (Fla. App., 2009) from creditors under similar statutory scemes. See In re Taylor, No , 2006 WL , at *2 (Bankr.C.D.Ill. May 9, 2006) (not reported in B.R.); In re Kircen, 34,4 B.R. 908 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.2006); In re Greenfield, 28,9 B.R. 146 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.2003); In re Sims, 24,1 B.R. 467 (Bankr. N.D.Okla.1999). In Sims, for example, a beneficiary wo ad inerited an IRA fied for protection under Capter 7 of te United States Bankruptcy Code in bankruptcy court. 241 B.R. at 468. Te beneficiary claimed is inerited IR was exempt, and te trustee and a creditor objected. Te bankruptcy court interpreted an exemption provision in te Oklaoma statutes tat exempted "any interest in a retirement plan or arrangement qualified for tax exemption purposes under present or future Acts of Congress... only to te extent tat contributions by or on bealf of a participant were not subject to federal income taxation to suc participant at te time of suc contributions." Id. at n. 2. Te bankruptcy court concluded tat te beneficiary's interest in te IRA did not qualify for exemption under tat statute because te original IR's tax exempt caracter canged completely wen it became classified as an inerited IR. Id. at 470. Te court explained tat, unlike original IRAs, inerited IRs are not veicles to defer taxation on income in order to preserve money for retirement. Instead, inerited IRAs are liquid assets tat te beneficiary may access at any time witout penalty and tat te beneficiary must take as income witout regard to retirement needs. Id. Te court concluded, "Te purpose of te... Legislature in exempting individual retirement accounts is to allow debtors to preserve assets wic ave been earmarked for retirement in te ordinary course of te debtor's affairs. Suc a purpose would not be served by upolding (te beneficiary'sj request to keep is interest in te IR as exempt." Id. at 471. We find tis reasoning persuasive and equally applicable to section (2)(a). Because te plain language of section (2)(a) references only te original. "fund or account" and te tax consequences of fastcase inerited IRAs like te one in tis case render tem a completely separate "fund or account," suc inerited IRAs are not exempt under tat section. Accordingly, we affirm te order denying (16 So.3d 940J Robertson's claim of exemption from garnisment in tis case. Notes: Affirmed. DAVIS and WALLACE, n., Concur. 1. Because Robertson cose to transfer is fater's account. into an inerited IR, our opinion today deals solely wit te applicability of section (2)(a) to tis type of IR account. Any reference we make in our opinion to an "inerited IR" is meant to refer to te type. of account created by Robertson in tis case
College Planning Using Cash Value Life Insurance
College Planning Using Cas Value Life Insurance CAUTION: Te advisor is urged to be extremely cautious of anoter college funding veicle wic provides a guaranteed return of premium immediately if funded
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: LEANNA WEISSMANN Lawrenceburg, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: DOUGLAS R. DENMURE Aurora, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE: THE MARRIAGE OF GLEN
More informationF I L E D March 12, 2012
Case: 11-40377 Document: 00511784972 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/12/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 12, 2012 Lyle
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRUCE D. BERLINGER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D12-6470
More informationHow To Ensure That An Eac Edge Program Is Successful
Introduction Te Economic Diversification and Growt Enterprises Act became effective on 1 January 1995. Te creation of tis Act was to encourage new businesses to start or expand in Newfoundland and Labrador.
More informationBankruptcy And Property Of The Estate - An Overview
IMPACT OF BANKRUPTCY ON DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES Honorable K. Rodney May United States Bankruptcy Judge Tampa, Florida September 2012 1. Bankruptcy -- Overview. A bankruptcy case begins with the filing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 14-11921 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22917-MGC.
Case: 14-11921 Date Filed: 02/25/2015 Page: 1 of 8 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11921 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-22917-MGC UNITED
More informationREAL ESTATE ISSUES IN DIVORCE CASES. Steven L. Raynor Raynor Law Office, P.C. 211 Fifth Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902
REAL ESTATE ISSUES IN DIVORCE CASES by Steven L. Raynor Raynor Law Office, P.C. 211 Fifth Street, NE Charlottesville, VA 22902 I. Introduction It is typical for divorce attorneys to oversee the transfer
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA In Re NATASHA B. BUNN Case No. 02-17303-MAM-7 Debtor. ORDER OVERRULING TRUSTEE S OBJECTION AND FINDING THAT DEBTOR S INTEREST IN A $12,500 ANNUITY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-000-l-blm Document 0 Filed 0 Page of 0 0 IN RE: ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Debtor, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. ELEAZAR SALAZAR, Appellant, Appellee. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2012. v. Case No. 5D10-3741
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2012 WHALEY FERNANDES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D10-3741 VALERIE J. FERNANDES, Appellee. / Opinion filed April 20, 2012
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HELEN CARROLL, Appellant, v. STUART G. ISRAELSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Jeffrie Carroll, STUART G. ISRAELSON
More information2:11-cv-15279-RHC-MAR Doc # 10 Filed 09/29/12 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 313 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:11-cv-15279-RHC-MAR Doc # 10 Filed 09/29/12 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 313 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: NEHYA AHMED, Debtor. / NEHYA AHMED Appellant,
More informationCASEY v. CASEY Court of Appeals of Arkansas No. CA 98-900, 1999 WL 138783 March 10, 1999
CASEY v. CASEY Court of Appeals of Arkansas No. CA 98-900, 1999 WL 138783 March 10, 1999 GRIFFEN, J. Meverine Casey appeals from a decision filed on March 31, 1998, by the Faulkner County Probate Court.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION In re: } TERESA STRICKLAND, } CASE NO. 09-41624 } Debtor. } CHAPTER: 13 } OPINION ON TRUSTEE S
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
In re UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION DOUGLAS W. MEYN, Case No. 8:04-bk-19108-KRM Chapter 7 Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY UNITED STATES
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 14, 2010; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2009-CA-000282-MR AND NO. 2009-CA-000334-MR BRIAN G. SULLIVAN APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL
More informationNo. 3--07--0175 APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2008
No. 3--07--0175 Filed June 13, 2008 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2008 In re MARRIAGE OF CHRISTINE ANN ) Appeal from the Circuit Court TAKATA, ) of the 10th Judicial Circuit,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re JOHN A. ASUNMAA, SUSAN MARIE ASUNMAA, Debtors. Case No. 6:09-bk-07428-KSJ Chapter 7 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF
More informationSupreme Court Rules Inherited IRA Funds Not Exempt In Bankruptcy
Supreme Court Rules Inherited IRA Funds Not Exempt In Bankruptcy Alson R. Martin Lathrop & Gage LLP 10851 Mastin Boulevard Suite 1000 Overland Park, KS 66210-1669 Tel: (913) 451-5170 Mobile: (913) 220-8334
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6072 In re: Tenny Shikaro Zahn, f/k/a Terry Shikaro Garner, Debtor. Tenny Shikaro Zahn, Debtor-Appellant, Appeal from the United States
More informationI N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationBACKGROUND. On March 22, 1999, Cheryl A. Herald (the Debtor ) filed a. petition initiating a Chapter 7 case. On the Schedules and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: CHERYL A. HERALD f/k/a CHERYL A. ROE, Debtor. FOR PUBLICATION CASE NO. 99-20788 DECISION & ORDER David D. MacKnight, Esq. Kenneth W. Gordon,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Huntington Natl. Bank v. Winter, 2011-Ohio-1751.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK and MERCHANTS BANK & TRUST CO., vs. Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationTHE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITIONER S BRIEF ON THE MERITS
LINDA CRAWFORD, vs. Petitioner. JANNIE BARKER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Manuel R. Crawford, Respondent. THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT / S. Ct. Case No. SC09-1969 CASE No.: 3D08-2251 PETITIONER
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011
MAY, C.J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011 STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. LOUIS SILBER and ILENE SILBER, Appellees. Nos. 4D10-1549 and
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit May 15, 2008 Barbara A. Schermerhorn Clerk IN RE CHRISTOPHER
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 10-3272. In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor. ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 10-3272 In re: JOHN W. HOWARD, Debtor NOT PRECEDENTIAL ROBERT O. LAMPL, Appellant VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. On Appeal from the United States District
More informationWhether Non-Spousal Inherited Retirement Accounts Are Exempt Under the Bankruptcy Code. Kimberly Tracey, J.D. Candidate 2015
2014 Volume VI No. 29 Whether Non-Spousal Inherited Retirement Accounts Are Exempt Under the Bankruptcy Code Kimberly Tracey, J.D. Candidate 2015 Cite as: Whether Non-Spousal Inherited Retirement Accounts
More informationIN THE INDIANA TAX COURT
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER JEROME L. WITHERED ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA WITHERED BURNS & PERSIN, LLP JENNIFER E. GAUGER Lafayette, IN DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL Indianapolis,
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 94-CV-1215. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Noel A. Kramer, Trial Judge)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2011 JON AGEE and SUSAN AGEE, Appellants, v. ROGER L. BROWN, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF HERBERT G. BIRCK and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: DONALD BONUCHI and, Case No. 04-21387-drd-7 CINDY BONUCHI, Debtors. Adv. No. 04-2044-drd JANICE A. HARDER, Trustee, Plaintiff,
More information2016 IL App (5th) 150222 NO. 5-15-0222 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 05/27/16. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2016 IL App (5th) 150222 NO. 5-15-0222
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LOUIS A. FIORE and JEAN H. FIORE, Appellants, v. Case No. 2D14-1872
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000005-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-012076-O v. EMERGENCY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) KEVIN DEAN STOVER and ) Case No. 05-43103 SHERRIE ANN STOVER, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER GRANTING THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 15 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 26th day of February, 2008, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2007-CC-1091 FREY PLUMBING
More informationNo, 79,495. [January 28, 19933
No, 79,495 IN RE: PAULA L. McCOLLAM, DEBTOR TI-IOMAS E. LeCROY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. PAULA L. McCOLLAM, Defendant-Appellee. [January 28, 19933 HARDING, J. We have for review In re McCollam, 955 F.2d
More informationv. Record No. 050236 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 4, 2005
Present: All the Justices DESTINY JOY CRAWFORD, ET AL. v. Record No. 050236 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS November 4, 2005 TERRY B. HADDOCK, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Background
In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JONATHAN NEIL IRWIN, JONATHAN N. IRWIN, vs. OLSON & BEARDEN, Case No. 03-3421-8G7 Chapter 7 Debtor. Plaintiff, Adv. No. 8:04-ap-723-PMG
More informationIs an inherited individual retirement account a retirement fund under the Bankruptcy Code, and thus exempted from a debtor s bankruptcy estate?
Clark v. Rameker Issues: Is an inherited individual retirement account a retirement fund under the Bankruptcy Code, and thus exempted from a debtor s bankruptcy estate? Oral argument: March 24, 2014 Court:
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 RASHA KHEDR SHAWARBY, : : Appellant : : v. : : AMR OMAR SHAWARBY AND THE : ESTATE OF AMR OMAR SHAWARBY, : A/K/A AO SHAWARBY, DECEASED : IN THE
More informationMassachusetts asset protection statutes Compiled but kept up to date only as time allows. Summary:
Massachusetts asset protection statutes Compiled but kept up to date only as time allows. From the Office of: Borchers Trust Law Group, P.C. 77 Main Street, Medway, MA 02053. Tel. (508) 803-1900. www.borcherslaw.com
More informationCASE NO. 1D13-3086. John H. Adams, P. Michael Patterson, and Cecily M. Welsh of Emmanuel, Sheppard, and Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALAN B. BOOKMAN, AS SUCCESSOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH E. IRBY, DECEASED, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION
More informationAn appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County. Paul S. Bryan, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationSAMPLE BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE FORM Page 1 of 2
One Division Avenue Room 200 Grand Rapids, MI 49503-3132 Phone : (616) 456-2693 http://www.miwb.uscourts.gov/ WHAT IS CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY? Chapter 7 bankruptcy, sometimes call a straight bankruptcy is
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Estate of Albrecht v. Winter, 2015 IL App (3d) 130651 Appellate Court Caption THE ESTATE OF DOUGLAS V. ALBRECHT, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. CHERYL
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013 STEVEN STAUM, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF FRIEDWALD CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC, Appellant, GERBER, J. v. PETRINA RUBANO
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: AUGUST 14, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION OF APRIL 10, 2015, WITHDRAWN Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-001214-MR & NO. 2013-CA-001253-MR JILL LEANN STANLEY,
More informationCase 13-17238-RG Doc 54 Filed 02/25/15 Entered 02/25/15 16:00:58 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X In Re: Chapter 13 Christopher P. Andolino, Case No.
More informationNo. 101,834 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of the Marriage of. MARC H. HALL, Appellant, and. SUSAN C. HALL, Appellee.
No. 101,834 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Marriage of MARC H. HALL, Appellant, and SUSAN C. HALL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Generally, an appellate court
More informationPersonal Liability of Corporate Officers and Directors for Tortious Conduct: An Overview of Florida Law. Douglas B. Lang, Esquire
Personal Liability of Corporate Officers and Directors for Tortious Conduct: An Overview of Florida Law By Douglas B. Lang, Esquire Generally, under Florida law officers of a corporation are not liable
More information2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION
County Civil Court: INSURANCE Personal Injury Protection Policy language stating that any amounts payable under this coverage shall be subject to any and all limitations including, but not limited to,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-0824 In re: Life Insurance Policy No. 1642947-2,
More informationPayment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary
Payment System Override Deems Transaction Not Ordinary Ames Merchandising Corp. v. Cellmark Paper Inc. (In re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc.), 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 969 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011) In Ames Merchandising
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-3085 Venture Bank lllllllllllllllllllllappellant v. Howard L. Lapides lllllllllllllllllllllappellee Appeal from United States District Court
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN J. BENZ and TRICIA McLAGAN, Appellants, v. Case No. 2D13-974
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re Case No. 13-23483 JANICE RENEE PUGH, Chapter 13 Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON DEBTOR S OBJECTION TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE S MOTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) CARL ANTHONY MONTANARO and ) Case No. 08-60665 ANNETTE nmn MONTANARO, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER SUSTAINING, IN PART, AND
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. February 23, 1999 Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Bedford Chancery No. 20, 945 )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JANET LYNN HOBBS, ) ) VS. FILED February 23, 1999 Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Bedford Chancery No. 20, 945 ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Appeal No. 01A01-9808-CH-00418
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED. Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. CASE NO.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant/Cross Appellee, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2005 Session IN THE MATTER OF: THE ESTATE OF LUCILLE JOHNSON HILL, Deceased Direct Appeal from the Probate Court for Henry County No. 2108 Hansel
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY, ETC., Appellant,
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00815-CV IN THE ESTATE OF Alvilda Mae AGUILAR From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802 Honorable
More informationv. CASE NO.: 2010-CV-15-A Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-19076-O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MAURICIO CHIROPRACTIC WEST, as assignee of Alesha Kirkland, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: 2010-CV-15-A Lower Court Case No.:
More information2015 IL App (5th) 140230-U NO. 5-14-0230 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 09/30/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th) 140230-U NO. 5-14-0230
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROSALYN ROKER, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D13-5565 TOWER HILL PREFERRED
More informationCommonwealth Of Kentucky. Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JULY 9, 2004; 10:00 a.m. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth Of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2003-CA-001285-MR HORACE B. SMITH, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF VICKIE L. RICE APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON
More information1999, the decree ordered Molly to pay, as a part of the division of the marital estate, the $14,477
Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed May 4, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01422-CV TEXANS CREDIT UNION, Appellant V. RICHARD C. BRIZENDINE, Appellee On Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOHN O. WORTH Worth Law Office Rushville, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: JULIE A. NEWHOUSE Newhouse & Newhouse Rushville, Indiana RODNEY V. TAYLOR MICHAEL A. BEASON
More informationS15A0965. MERMANN v. TILLITSKI. Sanna Mermann, formerly known as Sanna Tillitski (Wife), and
297 Ga. 881 FINAL COPY S15A0965. MERMANN v. TILLITSKI. MELTON, Justice. Sanna Mermann, formerly known as Sanna Tillitski (Wife), and Christopher Tillitski (Husband) were divorced in Bibb County pursuant
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JAMES MICHAEL WATSON 03-13355 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: CASE NO. JAMES MICHAEL WATSON 03-13355 DEBTOR CHAPTER 7 SECURITY RESOURCES, L.L.C. ADV. NO and INTERFACE SECURITY SYSTEMS, L.L.C. 04-1005
More informationCase: 13-1251 Document: 22 Filed: 02/05/2014 Page: 1 of 9 ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
0 0 Case: - Document: Filed: 0/0/0 Page: of ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. AZ---DPaKu ROBERT G. DALE, JR. and Bk. No. :-bk-0-gbn KATHY ANN
More informationNO. 01-03-00062-CV. D. B., Appellant. K. B., Appellee. On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.
Opinion issued August 12, 2004 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-03-00062-CV D. B., Appellant V. K. B., Appellee On Appeal from the 311th District Court Harris County, Texas
More information4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BUSSARD, v. Plaintiff, SHERMETA, ADAMS AND VON ALLMEN,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: FRED R. HAINS PETER M. YARBRO Hains Law Firm, LLP South Bend, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MARIA A. MITCHELL, ) ) Appellant-Respondent, ) ) vs. )
More informationORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 13, 2012.
Case 11-35116-AJC Doc 68 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 5 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on April 13, 2012. A. Jay Cristol, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN
More informationCase 14-31103 Document 72 Filed in TXSB on 10/22/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 14-31103 Document 72 Filed in TXSB on 10/22/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: DENNIS THOMAS BEACHAM CASE NO: 14-31103
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit YVONNE MURPHY HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee 2015-5134 Appeal from the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 27,407
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 TANYA ESPINOSA, TINA ESPINOSA, and RONNIE ESPINOSA, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NO.,0 UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MUTUAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs, November 13, 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs, November 13, 2009 DANA FOUST BOCHETTE v. MICHAEL LOUIS BOCHETTE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 5601DVC Hon. Clara
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: FEBRUARY 6, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-002027-MR KELLY NOBLE, JR. APPELLANT APPEAL FROM BREATHITT CIRCUIT COURT FAMILY COURT DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Chapter 7 Debtors. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE S MOTION FOR TURNOVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re BODEN J. PERRY and LUNDI D. PERRY, Case No. 05-24027 Chapter 7 Debtors. MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE S MOTION FOR TURNOVER The debtors
More informationSUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
VICTORY, J. * SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 99-C-0723 ROGER E. REINHARDT VERSUS LINDA KAY ANDERSON REINHARDT ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, PARISH OF OUACHITA The sole issue
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 8, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-000673-MR STEVEN WILDT APPELLANT APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON FAMILY COURT v. HONORABLE DOLLY W. BERRY,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 12, 2015
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 12, 2015 SUSAN MARIE JOYCE v. BRUCE CADE ELLARD Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 13CV607 Robert E. Corlew,
More informationFlorida Bankruptcy Case Law Update
Florida Bankruptcy Case Law Update October 2014 Cases Editors of the Florida Bankruptcy Case Law Update Bradley M. Saxton and C. Andrew Roy Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A. This Month s Author
More informationHow To Get A Disability Payout
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SCHOOL BOARD OF LEE COUNTY AND JOHNS EASTERN COMPANY, INC., Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationNo. 2 10 0601 Order filed June 16, 2011 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
Order filed June 16, 2011 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). IN THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L-14-1153. Trial Court No.
[Cite as Hayes v. Kelly, 2015-Ohio-796.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY John T. Hayes Appellee Court of Appeals No. L-14-1153 Trial Court No. CVG-14-07339 v. Angeline
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT D.H., the Father, Appellant, v. T.N.L., the Mother and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, Appellees. No. 4D15-3918 [ May 11, 2016 ] Appeal from
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KBD & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, UNPUBLISHED August 4, 2015 v No. 321126 Jackson Circuit Court GREAT LAKES FOAM TECHNOLOGIES, LC No. 10-000408-CK
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 12, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-2622 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10021 Fernando Montes
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-3036 ELIZABETH ANN WATERS, v. Petitioner, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Elizabeth A. Waters, of
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-150 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH D. AND TRUDI A. WOODARD,
More informationCASE NO. 1D14-4257. Robert O. Beasley and Phillip A. Pugh of Litvak Beasley & Wilson, LLP Pensacola, for Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RREF SNV-FL SSL, LLC., v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More information