UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION No. 1:12-cv MRB

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION No. 1:12-cv-00028-MRB"

Transcription

1 In re CHEMED CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION No. 1:12-cv MRB NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING If you purchased or otherwise acquired Chemed Corporation ( Chemed ) capital stock during the period from February 15, 2010 through May 2, 2013, inclusive (the Class Period ), you could get a payment from a class action settlement. SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY AUGUST 8, 2014 A federal court authorized this Notice. 1 This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Subject to the final approval of the Court, the parties to the above-captioned putative class action have reached an agreement to settle the case ( Settlement ). The Settlement will provide a $6 million settlement fund for the benefit of investors who bought Chemed capital stock during the Class Period i.e., between February 15, 2010 and May 2, 2013, inclusive. The Settlement resolves a lawsuit over whether Chemed and the other Defendants misled investors about certain of Chemed s business practices. Chemed and the other Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, those allegations, and this Settlement is not an admission of any kind of wrongdoing or liability by any of the Defendants. If you are a Settlement Class Member, your legal rights will be affected whether you act or do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT BY JUNE 18, 2014 OBJECT BY JUNE 18, 2014 GO TO A HEARING ON JULY 9, 2014 AT 1:30 p.m. DO NOTHING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT The only way to get a payment. Get no payment. This is the only option that allows you to ever be part of any other lawsuit against Chemed and the other Releasees involving any or all of the Settled Claims. (See Question 14 below.) Write to the Court about why you do not like the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or the request for attorneys fees and expenses. Ask to speak in Court about the Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or the request for attorneys fees and expenses. Get no payment. If you are a Settlement Class Member, be bound by the releases provided as part of this Settlement. Give up your rights. These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. The Court in charge of this case still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement. Payments will be made only if the Court approves the Settlement and after any appeals are resolved. Please be patient. A. Statement of Plaintiffs Recovery SUMMARY OF NOTICE Pursuant to the Settlement described in this Notice, a Settlement Fund consisting of Six Million U.S. Dollars ($6,000,000.00) in cash, plus any accrued interest, has been established. Lead Plaintiffs consulting damages expert has estimated that there were approximately 9.7 million shares of Chemed capital stock traded during the Class Period that may have been damaged. Based on this estimate, the average recovery per allegedly damaged share of Chemed capital 1 All capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Notice have the meanings provided in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement executed by the parties to the above-captioned lawsuit, dated February 6, 2014 (the Stipulation ). A copy of the Stipulation is available on the public docket of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, under the above lawsuit caption, or at and 1

2 stock from the Settlement is $0.62 per share 2 before deduction of Court approved costs, such as attorneys fees, litigation expenses, and administrative fees and expenses. A Settlement Class Member s actual recovery will be a portion of the Net Settlement Fund determined by comparing that Claimant s Recognized Loss (see page 7) to the total Recognized Losses of all Settlement Class Members who submit timely and valid Proofs of Claim. It will depend on the number of claims submitted, when during the Class Period a Settlement Class Member purchased Chemed capital stock, the purchase price paid, and whether those shares were held throughout or sold during the Class Period, and, if sold, when they were sold and the amount received. An individual Settlement Class Member may receive more or less than this average amount per share. See Plan of Allocation beginning on page 6. B. Statement of Potential Outcome of Case The Settling Parties disagree on both liability and damages and do not agree on the average amount of damages per share that would be recoverable if Plaintiffs were to have prevailed at trial on each claim alleged. The issues on which the Settling Parties disagree include (i) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were material or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (ii) the appropriate economic model for determining the amount by which Chemed s capital stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (iii) the amount by which Chemed s capital stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; (iv) the effect of various market forces influencing the trading price of Chemed s capital stock at various times during the Class Period; (v) the extent to which external factors, such as general market and industry conditions, influenced the trading price of Chemed s capital stock during the Class Period; (vi) the extent to which the various matters that Plaintiffs alleged were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading price of Chemed s capital stock during the Class Period; and (vii) the extent to which the various allegedly adverse material facts that Plaintiffs alleged were omitted influenced (if at all) the trading price of Chemed s capital stock during the Class Period. The Defendants deny that they have violated any laws, deny that they are liable to Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class, deny that Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class have suffered any damages, and deny any and all contentions that Defendants business, conduct and public statements constitute wrongdoing or give rise to legal liability of any kind or have caused damage. C. Statement of Attorneys Fees and Costs Sought Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court to award them attorneys fees of no more than 33% of the Settlement Fund and litigation expenses of no more than $200,000, incurred in connection with the prosecution of this Action, which may include a request for an award to Lead Plaintiffs for reimbursement of their reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class. The fee and expense request may include a request for interest, at the same rate and for the same periods as earned by the Settlement Fund. If the Court approves these requests, the fees and expenses would amount to an average cost of approximately $0.22 per allegedly damaged share. The average cost per allegedly damaged share will vary depending on the number of timely and valid claims submitted. Co-Lead Counsel have expended considerable time and effort in the prosecution of this litigation without receiving any payment, and have advanced the expenses of the litigation, such as the cost of experts, in the expectation that if they were successful in obtaining a recovery they would be paid from such recovery. In this type of litigation, it is customary for plaintiffs counsel to be awarded a percentage of the common fund recovered as attorneys fees. D. Further Information Further information regarding the Action and this Notice may be obtained by contacting Co-Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator: Co-Lead Counsel Evan J. Kaufman Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY (800) Jonathan Gardner Labaton Sucharow LLP 140 Broadway, 34th Floor New York, NY (888) Claims Administrator Chemed Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 990 Corte Madera, CA (877) PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT 2 An allegedly damaged share might have been traded more than once during the Class Period, and the indicated average recovery would be the total for all purchasers of that share. 2

3 E. Reasons for the Settlement For Lead Plaintiffs, the principal reason for the Settlement is the immediate benefit to the Settlement Class. This benefit must be compared to the risk that no recovery might be achieved after a contested trial and likely appeals, possibly years into the future. For the Defendants, who deny any and all liability whatsoever in connection with the Action and the Settled Claims, the principal reason for the Settlement is to limit further expense, inconvenience and distraction, to dispose of the burden of protracted litigation, and to permit the operation of Chemed s business without further distraction and diversion of Chemed s executives and other personnel with respect to the matters at issue in this Action. 1. Why did I get this Notice? BASIC INFORMATION You or someone in your family may have purchased Chemed capital stock during the period February 15, 2010 through May 2, 2013, inclusive. The Court directed that this Notice be sent to Settlement Class Members because they have a right to know about a proposed settlement of this class action lawsuit, and about all their options, before the Court decides whether to finally approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, and after any objections and appeals are resolved, a claims administrator appointed by the Court will make the payments that the Settlement allows. This package explains the lawsuit, the Settlement, Settlement Class Members legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to get them. The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The case is known as In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 1:12-cv MRB. This case is assigned to United States District Judge Michael R. Barrett. The people who sued are called Plaintiffs, and the company and the people and entities they sued, namely, Chemed Corporation, Kevin McNamara, David Williams, and Timothy O Toole, are called the Defendants. 2. What is this lawsuit about? This is a federal securities fraud class action that is pending before Judge Michael R. Barrett in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Lead Plaintiffs are the Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W., and the Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters Pension Fund. Defendant Chemed, a Delaware corporation, is a Cincinnati-based corporation whose wholly owned subsidiary, VITAS Healthcare Corporation, is one of the nation s largest hospice providers. The operative complaint in the Action, the Second Amended Complaint, dated February 6, 2014 (the Complaint ), alleges that Lead Plaintiffs and other Settlement Class Members purchased the capital stock of Chemed at prices artificially inflated as a result of the Defendants alleged dissemination of allegedly materially false or misleading statements. The Complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The Defendants deny any and all liability or wrongdoing whatsoever in connection with the claims asserted in the Action as well as all claims that that could have been asserted by Lead Plaintiffs or Settlement Class Members in connection with the purchase or acquisition of Chemed s capital stock during the Class Period. With the assistance of former Vice Chancellor of Delaware Court of Chancery Stephen Lamb acting as a mediator, Lead Plaintiffs, by their counsel, conducted lengthy discussions and arm s-length negotiations with counsel for Defendants on September 16, 2013, with a view to achieving a compromise and settlement of this Action and all issues in dispute between them, and achieving the best relief possible consistent with the best interests of the Settlement Class. Based upon their investigation, consultation with experts, and the assistance of the mediator, Co-Lead Counsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate to Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class, and in their best interests, and have agreed to settle the claims raised in the Action pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, after considering (i) the substantial benefits that Lead Plaintiffs and the members of the Settlement Class will receive from settlement of the Action, (ii) the attendant risks of litigation, and (iii) the desirability of permitting the Settlement to be consummated as provided by the terms of the Stipulation. 3. Why is this a class action? In a class action, one or more people called class representatives (in this case the Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103, I.B.E.W. and the Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters Pension Fund), sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. All these people together are a class or class members. Bringing a case, such as this one, as a class action allows the adjudication of many similar claims of different persons and entities that might be economically too small to bring in individual actions. One court resolves the issues for all class members, except those who exclude themselves from the class. 3

4 4. Why is there a Settlement? The Court has not decided the case in favor of either Plaintiffs or Defendants. Instead, both sides, with the assistance of former Vice Chancellor Lamb acting as a mediator, have agreed to the Settlement. That way, Plaintiffs avoid the risks and cost of a trial, and the people affected will get compensation. Defendants also avoid the continuing costs, burdens and distractions of litigation. The Class Representatives and their attorneys think the Settlement is best for the Settlement Class. WHO IS IN THE SETTLEMENT To see if you will get any money from this Settlement, you first have to determine if you are a Settlement Class Member. 5. How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? The Court directed, for the purpose of the proposed Settlement, that everyone who fits the following description is a Settlement Class Member: all persons or entities that purchased or otherwise acquired Chemed capital stock during the period from February 15, 2010 through May 2, 2013, inclusive, and who were damaged thereby. 6. Are there exceptions to being included in the Settlement Class? Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) the Defendants; (ii) the officers and directors of Chemed, at any point during the Class Period; (iii) members of the immediate family of each of the Individual Defendants and the officers and directors of Chemed, at any point during the Class Period; (iv) any entity in which Defendants have or had a controlling interest; and (v) the legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors or assigns of any such excluded party. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are any putative Settlement Class Members who validly exclude themselves from the Settlement Class by timely filing a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Notice. If one of your mutual funds purchased shares of Chemed capital stock during the Class Period, that alone does not make you a Settlement Class Member. You are a Settlement Class Member only if you directly purchased shares of Chemed capital stock during the Class Period. Check your investment records or contact your broker to see if you purchased Chemed capital stock during the Class Period. If you sold Chemed capital stock during the Class Period, that alone does not make you a Settlement Class Member. You are a Settlement Class Member only if you purchased or otherwise acquired your shares during the Class Period. 7. What if I am still not sure if I am included? If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call (877) or visit for more information. Or you can fill out and return the Proof of Claim form described on page 7, in Question 11, to see if you qualify. 8. What does the Settlement provide? THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET In exchange for the Settlement and a dismissal with prejudice of the Action, the Defendants and their insurers have agreed to create a $6 million fund to be divided, after deduction of attorneys fees and expenses, settlement administration fees and expenses, and any applicable Taxes (the Net Settlement Fund ), among all Settlement Class Members who timely send in valid Proof of Claim forms. Neither Defendants nor their insurers shall be liable for or required to pay to any member of the Settlement Class or Co-Lead Counsel any amount in excess of that $6 million fund. 9. How much will my payment be? Your share of the Net Settlement Fund will depend on several things, including: (i) the total amount of Recognized Losses (see Question 10) of other Settlement Class Members; (ii) how many shares of Chemed capital stock you purchased; (iii) how much you paid for your shares; (iv) when you bought them; and (v) whether or when you sold your shares, and, if so, for how much. Your Recognized Loss will be calculated according to the formula shown below in the Plan of Allocation (see Question 10). It is unlikely that you will get a payment for all of your Recognized Loss. After all Settlement Class Members have sent in their Proof of Claim forms, the payment you get will be a pro rata portion of the Net Settlement Fund based on your Recognized Loss divided by the total of everyone s Recognized Losses. See the Plan of Allocation below for more information on your Recognized Loss. 4

5 10. How will my claim be calculated? PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND The purpose of the Plan of Allocation is to distribute settlement proceeds equitably to those Settlement Class Members who suffered economic losses resulting from the alleged misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants during the Class Period. The Court may approve the Plan of Allocation or modify it without additional notice to the Settlement Class. Any order modifying the Plan of Allocation will be posted at and 3 The $6,000,000 Settlement Amount and any interest earned thereon following its funding shall be the Settlement Fund. The Settlement Fund, less all Taxes, approved costs, fees and expenses (the Net Settlement Fund ) shall be distributed to members of the Settlement Class who timely submit valid Proofs of Claim ( Authorized Claimants ). Settlement Class Members who do not submit valid Proofs of Claim will not share in the Settlement proceeds but will otherwise be bound by the terms of the Settlement, including the releases provided to Defendants, and the Judgment entered by the Court. The Claims Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss. The Recognized Loss formula is not intended to estimate the amount a Settlement Class Member might have been able to recover after trial; nor does it estimate the amount that will be paid to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the Settlement. The Recognized Loss formula is the basis upon which the Net Settlement Fund will be proportionately allocated to the Authorized Claimants. No distributions to Authorized Claimants who would receive less than $10.00 will be made, given the administrative expenses of processing and mailing such checks. Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation, or such other plan as may be approved by the Court, shall be final and conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. The Defendants, their respective counsel, and all other Releasees will have no responsibility for or liability whatsoever for the investment of the Settlement Fund, the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation or the payment of any claim. Lead Plaintiffs and Co-Lead Counsel likewise will have no liability for their reasonable efforts to execute, administer, and distribute the Settlement. The proposed Plan of Allocation reflects Lead Plaintiffs contention disputed by Defendants that the price of Chemed capital stock was artificially inflated throughout the Class Period, but that parts of the inflation were removed upon various disclosures being revealed. The Defendants deny that contention and any and all allegations of wrongdoing or liability. Neither this Plan of Allocation which was prepared by Lead Plaintiffs and Co-Lead Counsel nor the discussion of it that follows constitutes an admission of any kind of wrongdoing or liability by any of the Defendants. Defendants and their counsel and insurers do not, and are not required to, endorse or approve this Plan of Allocation, or the methods of calculation discussed below. General Principles of the Plan of Allocation The Plan of Allocation recognizes and compensates Authorized Claimants for losses allegedly caused by two disclosures of information made during the Class Period that allegedly relate to Lead Plaintiffs allegations in the Action. First, on November 16, 2011, Bloomberg News published an article regarding a whistleblower lawsuit filed by a former VITAS employee in San Antonio, Texas. After adjusting for general equity market and comparable industry security price changes on November 16, 2011, Lead Plaintiffs damages consultant concluded that this alleged disclosure removed $5.96 per share of alleged artificial stock price inflation at that time. Second, after the close of trading on May 2, 2013, the Department of Justice announced that the federal government filed a lawsuit against Chemed and various wholly owned hospice subsidiaries, including Vitas Hospice Services LLC and Vitas Healthcare Corp., alleging false Medicare billings. After adjusting for general equity market and comparable industry security price changes on November 16, 2011, Lead Plaintiffs damages consultant concluded that this alleged disclosure removed $13.97 per share of artificial stock price inflation at that time. As described in the Plan of Allocation, no Recognized Loss shall be recognized for shares that were purchased and resold within the periods: (a) February 15, 2010 through November 15, 2011; and (b) November 16, 2011 through May 2, The Plan of Allocation also precludes a recovery for losses that are unrelated to the fraud alleged in the Action. As provided for in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ( PSLRA ), the Plan of Allocation limits Recognized Losses based on the price levels of Chemed capital stock during the 90-day lookback period following each disclosure discussed above. If any of the calculations below result in a negative number (e.g., a Claimant s purchase price was less than a Claimant s sales price under paragraph 1C(2)(a) or a Claimant s purchase price was less than the average closing price of Chemed 3 Defendants had no involvement in preparing the proposed Plan of Allocation, and will have no involvement in its implementation. Defendants bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the allocation, distribution, use or administration of the Settlement Fund. 5

6 capital stock between November 16, 2011 and the date of sale under paragraph 1C(2)(b)), that negative figure shall constitute a Recognized Gain. In addition, for shares purchased and resold within the periods: (a) February 15, 2010 through November 15, 2011; and (b) November 16, 2011 through May 2, 2013, if a Claimant s purchase price was less than Claimant s sales price, that negative figure shall constitute a Recognized Gain. The sum of any Recognized Gains will be used to offset the sum of any Recognized Losses. Calculation of Recognized Loss Amounts 1. For shares of Chemed capital stock purchased or otherwise acquired between February 15, 2010 and November 15, 2011: A. For shares held at the end of trading on February 13, 2012 (90 days after the first corrective disclosure on November 15, 2011) 4, the Recognized Loss shall be the number of shares held on that date multiplied by the lesser of: (1) $5.96 per share; or (2) the difference between the purchase price per share and $ B. For shares sold between February 15, 2010 and November 15, 2011, there shall be no Recognized Loss. C. For shares sold between November 16, 2011 and February 13, 2012, the Recognized Loss shall be the lesser of: (1) $5.96 per share; or (2) the lesser of (a) the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share; or (b) the difference between the purchase price per share and the average closing price of Chemed capital stock between November 16, 2011 and the date of sale For shares of Chemed capital stock purchased or otherwise acquired between November 16, 2011 and May 2, 2013: A. For shares held at the end of trading on July 31, 2013 (90 days after the second corrective disclosure on May 2, 2013) 6, the Recognized Loss shall be the number of shares held on that date multiplied by the lesser of: (1) $13.97 per share; or (2) the difference between the purchase price per share and $ B. For shares sold between November 16, 2011 and May 2, 2013, there shall be no Recognized Loss. C. For shares sold between May 3, 2013 and July 31, 2013, the Recognized Loss shall be the lesser of: (1) $13.97 per share; or (2) the lesser of (a) the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share; or (b) the difference between the purchase price per share and the average closing price of Chemed capital stock between May 3, 2013 and the date of sale. 7 4 Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the PSLRA, in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated. $53.25 was the mean closing price of Chemed capital stock during the 90-day period beginning on November 16, 2011 and ending on February 13, Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(2) of the PSLRA, in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the market price of a security, if the plaintiff sells or repurchases the subject security prior to the expiration of the 90-day period described in paragraph (1), the plaintiff s damages shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the security and the mean trading price of the security during the period beginning immediately after dissemination of information correcting the misstatement or omission and ending on the date on which the plaintiff sells or repurchases the security. The average closing price of Chemed capital stock between November 16, 2011 and each trading date through February 13, 2012 is found on Table A. 6 See footnote 4 for an explanation of the relevant statutory provision. $71.11 was the mean closing price of Chemed capital stock during the 90-day period beginning on May 3, 2013 and ending on July 31,

7 Additional Principles For purposes of determining whether a Claimant has a Recognized Loss, purchases/acquisitions, and sales of Chemed capital stock will be matched on a First In/First Out ( FIFO ) basis. If a Claimant has more than one purchase/acquisition or sale of Chemed capital stock during the Class Period, all purchases/acquisitions and sales of Chemed capital stock shall be matched using FIFO. Class Period sales will be matched first against any holdings at the beginning of the Class Period, and then against purchases/acquisitions in chronological order, beginning with the earliest purchase/acquisition made during the Class Period. The receipt or grant by gift, inheritance, or operation of law of Chemed capital stock during the Class Period shall not be deemed a purchase, acquisition, or sale of such security for the calculation of a Claimant s Recognized Loss. To the extent there are sufficient funds in the Net Settlement Fund, each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to the Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss. If, however, the amounts in the Net Settlement Fund are not sufficient to permit payment of the total of all Recognized Losses, then each Authorized Claimant will be paid the percentage of the Net Settlement Fund that each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss bears to the total of the Recognized Losses of all Authorized Claimants ( pro rata share ). If the funds remaining in the Settlement Fund following pro rata distribution(s) to all Authorized Claimants are an amount that is not cost effective or efficient to redistribute to Authorized Claimants, then such remaining funds, after payment of any further Notice and Administration Expenses, Taxes and Tax Expenses, shall be contributed to the Legal Aid Society of Greater Cincinnati, a non-sectarian, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) organization. 11. How can I get a payment? HOW YOU GET A PAYMENT SUBMITTING A PROOF OF CLAIM FORM To qualify for a payment, you must timely submit a valid Proof of Claim form. A Proof of Claim form is being circulated with this Notice. You may also get a Proof of Claim form on the internet at Read the instructions carefully, fill out the Proof of Claim form, include copies of all the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it, together with all necessary documents, postmarked or received no later than August 8, 2014 to: 12. When would I get my payment? Chemed Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 990 Corte Madera, CA The Court will hold a hearing at 1:30 p.m. on July 9, 2014, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. If the Court approves the Settlement, after that there may also be appeals. It is always uncertain whether and when these appeals can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps more than a year. It also takes time for all the Proofs of Claim to be processed. Please be patient. 13. What am I giving up to get a payment or by staying in the Settlement Class? If you are a Settlement Class Member, then, unless you exclude yourself, you are staying in the Settlement Class and that means that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, you will release all Settled Claims (as defined below) against the Releasees (as defined below), fully and finally, and with prejudice. Settled Claims means any and all claims (including any claim that the Stipulation was fraudulently induced), debts, demands, rights, actions, suits, causes of action or liabilities whatsoever (including, but not limited to, any and all claims for damages, interest, attorneys fees, expert or consulting fees, and any other costs, expenses or liability whatsoever), whether based on federal, state, local, statutory, or common law, or any other law, rule or regulation (whether foreign or domestic), whether class or individual in nature, including both known claims and Unknown Claims, (i) that have been asserted in this Action by or on behalf of the Settlement Class Members or any of them against any of the Releasees (including without limitation all claims and allegations in the Complaint, the Amended Complaint and/or the Second Amended Complaint), or (ii) that could have been asserted in any forum by or on behalf of the Releasors now or in the future, or any of them, against any of the Releasees or Defendants Counsel that relate to, or that in any way arise out of, or are based upon, the allegations, transactions, facts, matters or occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, representations, omissions, or failures to act involved, set forth, or referred to in any of the complaints or proposed complaints filed in this Action, including but not limited to the Complaint, the Amended Complaint and/or the Second Amended Complaint, and that relate to the purchase, acquisition, or sale of the capital stock of Chemed during the Class 7 See footnote 5 for an explanation of the relevant statutory provision. The average closing price of Chemed capital stock between May 3, 2013 and each trading date through July 31, 2013 is found on Table A. 7

8 Period. For the avoidance of doubt, Settled Claims do not include: (i) claims to enforce the Settlement; (ii) KBC Asset Management NV, et al. v. Kevin J. McNamara, et al., No. 13-cv UNA (D. Del.); (iii) North, et al. v. Kevin J. McNamara, et al., No. 1:13-cv MRB (S.D. Ohio); and (iv) any governmental or regulatory agency s claims in, or any right to relief from, any criminal or civil action against any of the Releasees. Releasees refers jointly and severally, individually and collectively to Individual Defendants, Chemed, and its past, present, and future direct and indirect parents, subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates, and their respective present and former officers, directors, employees, managers, agents, insurers, attorneys and legal representatives, and the predecessors, successors, heirs, executors, trustees, administrators and assigns of each of the foregoing. As used in this Paragraph, affiliates means entities controlling, controlled by or under common control with Chemed. The Releasees are express third-party beneficiaries of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement. Unknown Claims means any and all Settled Claims which any Lead Plaintiff or Releasor does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time the release of the Releasees, and any Settled Defendants Claims which any Defendant or Releasee does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor, which if known by him, her or it might have affected his, her or its decision(s) with respect to the Settlement. With respect to any and all Settled Claims and Settled Defendants Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that upon the Effective Date, the Lead Plaintiffs and the Defendants shall expressly waive, and each Releasor and Releasee shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment or Alternative Judgment shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights and benefits of conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar comparable, or equivalent to Cal. Civ. Code 1542, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Releasors may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she, or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Settled Claims, but each of them hereby stipulates and agrees that the Lead Plaintiffs, and each Releasor shall be deemed to settle and release, and upon the Effective Date and by operation of the Judgment or Alternative Judgment shall have settled and released, fully, finally, and forever, and all Settled Claims against Releasees, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or which heretofore existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent or intentional and with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law, or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Similarly, Defendants may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she, or it now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of Settled Defendants Claims, but each of them hereby stipulates and agrees that Defendants, and Releasees shall be deemed upon the Effective Date and by operation of the Judgment or Alternative Judgment, to have fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Settled Defendants Claims against Releasors, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, which now exist, or heretofore have existed upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future, including, but not limited to, conduct which is negligent, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law, or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Lead Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge, and all other Releasors and Releasees by operation of law shall be deemed to have acknowledged, that the inclusion of Unknown Claims in the definition of Settled Claims and Settled Defendants Claims was separately bargained for and was a key element of the Settlement. The Effective Date of the Settlement will occur when an Order by the Court approving the Settlement becomes Final and is not subject to appeal, as set out more fully in the Stipulation. The Stipulation is on file with the Court and available at and If you are a Settlement Class Member and you stay in the Settlement Class, all of the Court s orders will apply to you and will legally bind you. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT If you do not want a payment from this Settlement, and you want to keep any right you may have to sue or continue to sue the Defendants and the other Releasees on your own in connection with any part of the Settled Claims, then you must take steps to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class. This is called opting out or seeking exclusion from the Settlement Class. Defendants may withdraw from and terminate the Settlement if Settlement Class Members who purchased in excess of a certain amount of Chemed capital stock exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. 14. How do I get out of the proposed Settlement? To exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you must send a written, signed letter by mail stating that you request to be excluded from the Settlement Class in In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 1:12-cv-028 (S.D. Ohio). Your letter must state: the date(s), and corresponding price(s) and number(s) of shares, of all purchases/acquisitions and sales 8

9 of Chemed capital stock you made during the Class Period. In addition, you must include your name, address, telephone number, and your signature. You must mail your written, signed exclusion request so that it is received at the following address no later than June 18, 2014: Chemed Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 990 Corte Madera, CA You cannot exclude yourself from the Settlement Class by telephone or by . Any attempt to do so will be ineffective and invalid. Also, your request for exclusion from the Settlement Class will be invalid if either (a) you fail to provide all of the information specified above, or (b) it is not received at the above address by the date specified. If you ask to be excluded, you will not get any settlement payment, and you cannot object to the Settlement. You will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this lawsuit, and you may be able to sue (or continue to sue) the Defendants and the other Releasees individually in the future. 15. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants and the other Releasees for the same thing later? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any rights to sue the Defendants and the other Releasees for any and all Settled Claims. If you have a pending lawsuit, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from this Settlement Class to continue your own lawsuit. Remember, the exclusion deadline is June 18, If I exclude myself, can I get money from the proposed Settlement? No. If you exclude yourself, do not send in a Proof of Claim form to ask for any money. But you may exercise any right you may have to sue, continue to sue, or be part of any different lawsuit against the Defendants and the other Releasees. 17. Do I have a lawyer in this case? THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING THE SETTLEMENT CLASS The Court ordered that the law firms below represent the Settlement Class. These lawyers are called Co-Lead Counsel. You will not be separately charged for these lawyers and the services they provide. The Court will determine the amount of Co-Lead Counsel s fees and expenses, which will be paid from the Settlement Fund. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. Samuel H. Rudman Evan J. Kaufman Edward Y. Kroub Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY (800) How will the lawyers be paid? Jonathan Gardner Mark S. Goldman Carol C. Villegas Labaton Sucharow LLP 140 Broadway, 34th Floor New York, NY (888) At the Settlement Hearing, or at such other time as the Court may order, Co-Lead Counsel will ask the Court to award them, from the Settlement Fund, attorneys fees of no more than 33% of the Settlement Fund, plus any interest on such amount at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund, and litigation expenses (such as the cost of experts) that have been incurred in pursuing the Action, which may include the costs and expenses (including lost wages) of Lead Plaintiffs. The request for litigation expenses will not exceed $200,000, plus interest on the expenses at the same rate as may be earned by the Settlement Fund. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT You can tell the Court that you do not agree with the Settlement or some part of it. 19. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the proposed Settlement? If you are a Settlement Class Member you can object to the Settlement or any of its terms, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and/or the application by Co-Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses. You may write to the Court explaining your objection. You may give reasons why you think the Court should not approve any or all of the Settlement terms or arrangements. The Court will consider your views if you file a proper objection within the deadline and according to the following procedures: To object, you must send a signed letter stating that you object to the proposed Settlement in In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 1:12-cv-028 (S.D. Ohio). You must include your name, address, telephone number, and your signature; identify the date(s), and corresponding price(s) and number(s) of shares, of all purchases, acquisitions and sales of Chemed capital stock you made during the Class Period; and state the reasons why you object to the Settlement. 9

10 Your objection must be filed with the Court and mailed to all the following counsel so that it is received no later than June 18, 2014: COURT CO-LEAD COUNSEL DEFENDANTS COUNSEL DESIGNEE Clerk of the Court United States District Court Southern District of Ohio Western Division Evan J. Kaufman Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 58 South Service Road, Suite 200 Melville, NY Timothy G. Cameron Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP Worldwide Plaza 825 Eighth Avenue Potter Stewart United States New York, NY Jonathan Gardner Courthouse Labaton Sucharow LLP 100 East Fifth Street 140 Broadway, 34th Floor Cincinnati, OH New York, NY You do not need to go to the Settlement Hearing to have your written objection considered by the Court. If you want to speak at the Settlement Hearing, any Settlement Class Member who has not previously submitted a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class and who has complied with the procedures set out in this Question and Question 23 below may also appear and be heard, to the extent allowed by the Court, concerning the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or Co- Lead Counsel s motion for an award of attorneys fees and expenses. Any such objector may appear in person or arrange, at that objector s expense, for a lawyer to represent them at the Settlement Hearing. 20. What is the difference between objecting and seeking exclusion? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the proposed Settlement. You can object only if you remain in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you. THE COURT S SETTLEMENT HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you do not have to do either. 21. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement? The Court will hold the Settlement Hearing at 1:30 p.m. on July 9, 2014, at the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, Potter Stewart United States Courthouse, 100 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio At this hearing the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. At the hearing, the Court will also consider the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlement and the application of Co-Lead Counsel for attorneys fees and payment of expenses. The Court will take into consideration any written objections filed in accordance with the instructions in Question 19. The Court also may listen to people who have properly indicated an intention to speak at the hearing, but decisions regarding the conduct of the hearing will be made by the Court. See Question 23 for more information about speaking at the hearing. After the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement. We do not know how long these decisions will take. You should be aware that the Court may change the date and time of the Settlement Hearing. If you want to come to the hearing, you should check with Co-Lead Counsel beforehand to be sure that the date and/or time has not changed. 22. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Co-Lead Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But you are welcome to come at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to Court to talk about it. As long as you filed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also pay your own lawyer to attend, but it is not necessary. Settlement Class Members do not need to appear at the hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval. 23. May I speak at the hearing? If you object to the Settlement, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Hearing. To do so, you must include with your objection (see Question 19 above) a statement that it is your Notice of Intention to Appear in the In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, No. 1:12-cv-028 (S.D. Ohio). Persons who intend to object to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or counsel s application for an award of attorneys fees and expenses and desire to present evidence at the hearing must include in their written objections the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, you cannot speak at the Settlement Hearing if you have excluded yourself from the Settlement Class or if you have not provided written notice of your objection and intention to speak at the hearing in accordance with the procedures described in Questions 19 and

11 24. What happens if I do nothing at all? IF YOU DO NOTHING If you do nothing, you will get no money from this Settlement and you will be precluded from starting a lawsuit, continuing with a lawsuit, or being part of any other lawsuit against Defendants and other Releasees about the Settled Claims in this case, ever again. To share in the Net Settlement Fund you must submit a Proof of Claim form (see Question 11). To start, continue or to be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants and the other Releasees about the Settled Claims in this case, you must exclude yourself from this Settlement Class (see Question 14). GETTING MORE INFORMATION 25. Are there more details about the proposed Settlement? This Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are in the Stipulation. You can get a copy of the Stipulation by writing to any one of Co-Lead Counsel, or by visiting or You can also call the Claims Administrator at (877) toll free; write to the Claims Administrator at Chemed Securities Litigation, c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC, P.O. Box 990, Corte Madera, CA ; or visit where you will find answers to common questions about the Settlement, a Proof of Claim form, and other information to help you determine whether you are a Settlement Class Member and whether you are eligible for a payment. 26. How do I get more information? For even more detailed information concerning the matters involved in this Action, you may refer to the pleadings, to the Stipulation, to the Orders entered by the Court and to the other papers filed in the Action, which may be inspected during regular business hours at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, Potter Stewart United States Courthouse, 100 East Fifth Street, Cincinnati, Ohio SPECIAL NOTICE TO SECURITIES BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES If you purchased or acquired Chemed capital stock during the period from February 15, 2010 through May 2, 2013, inclusive, for the beneficial interest of a person or organization other than yourself, the Court has directed that WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE, you either (i) provide the Claims Administrator the name and last known address of each person or organization for whom or which you purchased Chemed capital stock during the Class Period or (ii) request additional copies of this Notice and the Proof of Claim form, which will be provided to you free of charge, and within seven (7) days of receipt mail the Notice and Proof of Claim form directly to the beneficial owners of that Chemed capital stock. If you choose to follow alternative procedure (ii), the Court has directed that, upon such mailing, you must send a statement to the Claims Administrator confirming that the mailing was made as directed. You are entitled to reimbursement from the Settlement Fund of your reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the foregoing, including reimbursement of postage expense and the cost of ascertaining the names and addresses of beneficial owners. Those expenses will be paid upon request and submission of appropriate supporting documentation. All communications concerning the foregoing should be addressed to the Claims Administrator: Chemed Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o Gilardi & Co. LLC P.O. Box 990 Corte Madera, CA (877) Dated: April 10, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 11

12 TABLE A Chemed Corporation Capital Stock Calculation of Average Closing Price During 90 Day Periods Following Corrective Disclosures Average Closing Price 11/16/2011 Through Date in Column 1 12 Average Closing Price 05/03/2013 Through Date in Column 4 Date Closing Price Date Closing Price 11/16/2011 $50.65 $ /3/2013 $68.00 $ /17/2011 $50.00 $ /6/2013 $68.78 $ /18/2011 $49.77 $ /7/2013 $68.17 $ /21/2011 $49.95 $ /8/2013 $67.52 $ /22/2011 $49.82 $ /9/2013 $67.08 $ /23/2011 $50.00 $ /10/2013 $63.90 $ /25/2011 $49.83 $ /13/2013 $64.87 $ /28/2011 $51.33 $ /14/2013 $65.87 $ /29/2011 $51.39 $ /15/2013 $66.49 $ /30/2011 $53.66 $ /16/2013 $66.67 $ /1/2011 $54.36 $ /17/2013 $68.18 $ /2/2011 $53.29 $ /20/2013 $68.33 $ /5/2011 $53.36 $ /21/2013 $68.54 $ /6/2011 $50.52 $ /22/2013 $67.69 $ /7/2011 $51.13 $ /23/2013 $67.73 $ /8/2011 $49.55 $ /24/2013 $68.27 $ /9/2011 $50.20 $ /28/2013 $68.45 $ /12/2011 $49.96 $ /29/2013 $68.38 $ /13/2011 $48.24 $ /30/2013 $69.10 $ /14/2011 $49.43 $ /31/2013 $70.02 $ /15/2011 $50.05 $ /3/2013 $70.87 $ /16/2011 $50.05 $ /4/2013 $70.49 $ /19/2011 $49.39 $ /5/2013 $70.65 $ /20/2011 $50.79 $ /6/2013 $71.00 $ /21/2011 $51.32 $ /7/2013 $71.78 $ /22/2011 $52.30 $ /10/2013 $72.13 $ /23/2011 $52.04 $ /11/2013 $71.46 $ /27/2011 $52.49 $ /12/2013 $72.00 $ /28/2011 $51.24 $ /13/2013 $72.83 $ /29/2011 $51.91 $ /14/2013 $72.53 $ /30/2011 $51.21 $ /17/2013 $72.86 $ /3/2012 $52.38 $ /18/2013 $74.02 $ /4/2012 $51.18 $ /19/2013 $73.71 $ /5/2012 $51.34 $ /20/2013 $73.16 $ /6/2012 $51.98 $ /21/2013 $73.50 $ /9/2012 $53.34 $ /24/2013 $73.02 $ /10/2012 $53.19 $ /25/2013 $73.43 $ /11/2012 $53.60 $ /26/2013 $74.44 $ /12/2012 $52.75 $ /27/2013 $73.16 $ /13/2012 $53.77 $ /28/2013 $72.43 $ /17/2012 $54.13 $ /1/2013 $73.13 $ /18/2012 $55.10 $ /2/2013 $72.95 $ /19/2012 $55.39 $ /3/2013 $73.06 $ /20/2012 $56.70 $ /5/2013 $73.97 $ /23/2012 $57.22 $ /8/2013 $74.25 $ /24/2012 $57.53 $ /9/2013 $73.50 $ /25/2012 $58.03 $ /10/2013 $73.80 $ /26/2012 $57.23 $ /11/2013 $74.09 $ /27/2012 $57.24 $ /12/2013 $75.34 $ /30/2012 $56.49 $ /15/2013 $75.64 $ /31/2012 $56.14 $ /16/2013 $75.88 $ /1/2012 $57.28 $ /17/2013 $74.74 $ /2/2012 $58.29 $ /18/2013 $75.03 $ /3/2012 $58.74 $ /19/2013 $69.26 $ /6/2012 $57.91 $ /22/2013 $70.16 $ /7/2012 $57.99 $ /23/2013 $71.56 $ /8/2012 $58.42 $ /24/2013 $71.35 $ /9/2012 $57.69 $ /25/2013 $71.46 $ /10/2012 $57.44 $ /26/2013 $72.87 $ /13/2012 $57.24 $ /29/2013 $72.02 $ /30/2013 $72.82 $ /31/2013 $70.59 $71.11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CITY OF LAKELAND EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. DENNIS ALTER, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. GENOPTIX, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re CELERA CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. 5:10-cv-02604-EJD(HRL CLASS ACTION NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION LOCAL 703, I.B. OF T. GROCERY AND FOOD EMPLOYEES WELFARE FUND, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN

More information

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery.

Reasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x : IN RE: NEVSUN RESOURCES LTD. : Civil Action No. 12 Civ. 1845 (PGG) :

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- In re WORLDSPACE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JULIO TARDIO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-cv-06619-JGK NEW ORIENTAL EDUCATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLENN FREEDMAN, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 12-CV-2121 (LAK) WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044 If you purchased or otherwise acquired the publicly traded common

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : CLASS ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x In re IMMUCOR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To Civil Action No. 105-cv-02276-WSD CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE MARGERY ROBERTSON, et al., On Behalf of Themselves Master Case No. 793247 and All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with 793468 and 795190

More information

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.

The two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE OCZ TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:12-cv-05265-RS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ADVANCED BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Consolidated Civil Action No. 11 Civ. 2279 (CM) NOTICE

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2:05-cv-00201-FtM-29DNF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2:05-cv-00201-FtM-29DNF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION IN RE MIVA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2:05-cv-00201-FtM-29DNF NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION MARCELO CUNHA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, HANSEN NATURAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 6, 2015 In re Delcath Systems, Inc Securities Litigation c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10189 Dublin, OH 43017-3189 1-888-470-0243 wwwdelcathsecuritieslitigationcom

More information

A U.S. Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A U.S. Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES LITIGATION 11 Civ. 1646 (LAK) (JCF) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT,

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Fairness

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 1:13-cv-02115 Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. 3:12-cv-01737-JM-JLB CLASS ACTION NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL TRANSPORT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 04-374 (JAP) (Consolidated Cases) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clark v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Case No.: 3:13-cv-0485-JM-JMA Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action A settlement

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 13-cv-1620-JPO ECF Case NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED

More information

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

United States District Court for the Northern District of California United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased a Tour from Viator between October 16, 2008 and June 7, 2014 that Was Advertised as Discounted with No Text Describing

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE MICROSTRATEGY INC. SECURITIES ) Civil Action No. 00-473-A LITIGATION ) ) TO: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re MiMedx Group, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No 1:13-cv-03074 Hon. Thomas W. Thrash CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 1 In re LONGS DRUG STORES CORP. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. C-0-0 CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM. Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 Tel: 800-625-7675 Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. c/o Claims Administrator PO Box 3207 Portland, OR 97208-3207 A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) WAYNE C. CONLEE, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. WMS INDUSTRIES INC., et al., Defendants. TO: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are a current or former user of PayPal in the United States who had an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November

More information

How To Object To The Erisa Class Action Settlement

How To Object To The Erisa Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO

More information

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Case No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN STETSON, SHANE LAVIGNE, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, VALENTIN YUI KARPENKO, and JAKE JEREMIAH FATHY, individually and on behalf of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ECF Case CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ECF Case CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. KINROSS GOLD CORPORATION,

More information

FILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING

FILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Your Personal ID # is Your Access Code is If you made a workers compensation claim in South Carolina under an AIG

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE LEON RASACHACK, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and ) Case No. 796083 All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, ) ) Assigned

More information

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store

More information

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re ACE LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION ) MDL No. 1675 ) CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To recover as a

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement.

If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If you purchased Gogo Inflight Internet service, you may be entitled to benefits from a class action settlement. A court authorized

More information

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :

Case 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : : Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,

More information

x : : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION

x : : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARY K. JONES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. PFIZER INC., et al., Plaintiff Defendants. x x Civil Action No.

More information

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you are not a California resident and you purchased Kashi All Natural / 100% Natural /Nothing Artificial Products between May 3, 2008

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid a practice assessment to the American Psychological Association Practice Organization, you

More information

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : EXHIBIT A Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Securities Action c/o Epiq Systems, Claims Administrator P.O. Box 3410 Portland, OR 97208-3410 Toll Free Number: (877) 819-9774 Settlement Website: www.bnymfxsecuritieslitigation.com

More information

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 18, 2015 In re CRM Holdings, Ltd Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 CRH *P-CRH-POC/1* Control No: Claim

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)

More information

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.

The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims

More information

1. What is this lawsuit about? 2. 4. What are the numbers from which AmeriCredit may have dialed Class Members? 2

1. What is this lawsuit about? 2. 4. What are the numbers from which AmeriCredit may have dialed Class Members? 2 Newman v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., 11cv3041-DMS-BLM (S.D. Cal.) United States District Court Southern District of California [www.newmanamericreditsettlement.com] Frequently Asked Questions

More information

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement

If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal court authorized this notice. This

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT.

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE YOU MUST COMPLETE THIS CLAIM FORM AND SUBMIT IT BY NOVEMBER 23, 2013 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 23, 2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Grant Barfuss, et al, v. DGSE Companies, Inc., et al. No. 12 Civ. 3664 (JJB) ECF

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GABRIEL JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1-09-CV-146501 CLASS ACTION Judge:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAVID HIMBER V. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC. CASE NO.: 09 Civ. 4143 (SJF) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT All persons who received

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you received a call from or on behalf of Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, you could be entitled to benefits under a class

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ X : IN RE LG.PHILIPS LCD CO., LTD. : Civil Action SECURITIES

More information

United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD)

United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD) NOTICE AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQ ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION United States District Court

More information

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing

Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Minor, et al. v. Congoleum Corporation United States District Court District Of New Jersey Case No.: 3:13-cv-07727-PGS-LHG This is a Notice

More information

x : : : : : : : x Master No. 1:11-cv-01918-LGS CLASS ACTION

x : : : : : : : x Master No. 1:11-cv-01918-LGS CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re SHENGDATECH, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To TO ALL ACTIONS. x x Master No. 111-cv-01918-LGS CLASS ACTION AMENDED NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SILVERSTRAND INVESTMENTS, SAFRON CAPITAL CORPORATION, and BRIARWOOD INVESTMENTS, INC., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A Settlement will provide $19,560.00

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN HILL, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CHINA-BIOTICS, INC., JINAN SONG, LI CHI YUEN a/k/a RAYMOND

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In re Merck & Co., Inc. Vioxx Securities Litigation c/o Epiq Systems P.O. Box 6659 Portland, OR 97228-6659 Toll Free Number: (866) 752-0067 Settlement Website: www.merckvioxxsecuritieslitigation.com Email:

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.

Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you purchased products from U.S. Foodservice, Inc. (now known as US Foods, Inc.) under a cost-plus arrangement between 1998 and 2005, you

More information

x : : : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION

x : : : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., et al., Defendants.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All persons who are domiciled or reside in the United States or its territories and whose

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

QUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) 322-8152 OR VISIT WWW.SPARKEMAILSETTLEMENT.COM 1

QUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) 322-8152 OR VISIT WWW.SPARKEMAILSETTLEMENT.COM 1 Notice of Settlement And Hearing Date for Court Approval Kristina Kirby, et al. v. Spark Networks, Inc., et al., Civil Case No. BC493892 Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles

More information

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled

More information

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,

More information

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan

If you received a Washington Mutual Home Loan EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Spears, et al. v. First American eappraiseit, Case No. 5-08-CV-00868 (RMW) If you received

More information

A United States District Court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A United States District Court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you paid money to invest in certain Real Estate Partners, Inc. Investment Funds (Income Fund I, Income Fund II, Income Fund III, Unit Investment

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEPHEN TREWIN and JOSEPH FARHATT, On Behalf of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., Defendant. Civ.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: In re Regions Morgan Keegan ERISA Litig., No. 2:08-cv-2192-SHM-dvk Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you had a Straight Talk, Net10, Simple Mobile, or Telcel America Unlimited Mobile Service Plan, you may be entitled to a cash refund

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Case :0-cv-0-DLR Document Filed 0// Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Local Teamsters Pension and Welfare Funds, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Apollo Group Incorporated,

More information

How To Approve A Settlement In A Lawsuit Against A Man Who Is A Former Patient Of A Farm Animal

How To Approve A Settlement In A Lawsuit Against A Man Who Is A Former Patient Of A Farm Animal Case 1:10-cv-07838-PAC Document 91 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:10-cv-07838-PAC Document 90-2 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN HILL, Individually

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IF YOU WORKED AS AN ENTERTAINER FOR RICK S CABARET IN NEW YORK, YOU COULD GET A PAYMENT FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. A federal

More information

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you paid an

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WEST END CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, SEO KYU LEE, MOON SUNG KIM,

More information

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to M&T Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A settlement will provide a $4,500,000 fund from which claims

More information

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015

Submit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hoover v. Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. Case No. EDCV 13 00097 JGB (OPx) If you purchased a product manufactured by Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., called Nasal Ease

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re CAFEPRESS INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Master File No. CIV522744 CLASS ACTION Assigned for All

More information

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708

Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against

More information