PERSONAL INJURY Alert
|
|
- Beryl Ross
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A weekly news bulletin from Greenwoods Issue 292: 17 November 2011 In this issue - When is an insurer entitled to adopt Article 75 status? - Vicarious Liability - Procedure/interim payment application - Procedure/infant settlement - Costs - Dates for your diary Seminars - Construing & interpreting insurance policies - Without prejudice negotiation of solicitors costs - do s and don ts Bristol One Redcliff Street BS1 6NP T London Bedford Square 18 Bedford Square WC1B 3JA T London Market Office 77 Gracechurch Street EC3V 0AS T Manchester 57 Spring Gardens, M2 2BY T Milton Keynes 2 Eskan Court Campbell Park MK9 4AN T Southampton 3600 Parkway The Solent Centre Solent Business Park Fareham PO15 7AN T SPOTLIGHT ON PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE When is an insurer entitled to adopt Article 75 status? We still find that there is confusion as to when an Article 75 insurer can/should adopt the status of an Article 75 insurer; the procedure that must be followed; and the In addition to gaining Article 75 status by obtaining a benefits of doing so. declaration on the grounds set out above, other situations that may give rise to Article 75 status include: The usual ground for seeking Article 75 status is where, following an accident, an insurer discovers that a policy A short period policy is issued (i.e. one for a term of has been issued on the basis of a material nondisclosure or misrepresentation by the policyholder. It expiring, a new insurance for the same vehicle and the less than three months) but rather than the policy may then apply to void the policy ab initio (i.e. as if it same policyholder begins within a period of 15 days had never been incepted). Grounds for voiding the from the expiry date. [Article 75 (2)(iii)]. policy in this way include a failure to disclose a serious disability or a drink-drive conviction. The policy is cancelled but the certificate is not recovered and the insurer obtains a declaration under To avoid retaining RTA status the insurer must apply S152(2). under S152(2) Road Traffic Act 1988 to obtain a declaration that it is entitled to void the policy ab initio. A cover note is issued but not taken up but the The application to obtain the declaration must be made insurer does not cancel it. before or within three months of the commencement by a claimant of proceedings arising out of the accident. On an open certificate there is a substituted or If there are additional claimants they must be told that additional vehicle of which the insurer was not made the declaration has been obtained before or within aware. seven days of the commencement of their action. The use of the vehicle at the time was not one An insurer successfully obtaining a declaration will covered by the policy e.g. the policy was for social and continue to deal with any third party claims under domestic purposes only and the vehicle was being used Article 75 (of MIB s Articles of Agreement) but has a for business purposes. number of advantages over a contractual insurer or an insurer dealing with the claim as RTA insurer under the Wherever the insurer s status is anything other than 1988 Act. contractual it will wish to protect its position in any proceedings and at the same time preserve its rights of - There is no liability if there is another insurer with a recovery against the driver and any causers or higher status (i.e. contractual or RTA) and their driver permitters. This will involve an application under CPR has a meaningful degree of liability to join the insurer to any proceedings as an additional defendant. Once joined the insurer may - There is no liability to meet subrogated claims. exercise all the rights of a defendant, without prejudicing its position against any other party. If this procedure is - Claims for damage to property arising before (but not not followed the insurer may inadvertently affirm the after) 11 June 2007 are subject to a compulsory excess contract of insurance and prejudice its rights of of 300. recovery. Personal Injury l Property & Construction l Insurance l Commercial & Financial Risks l Fraud l Health & Safety l Motor Prosecutions
2 Page 2 of 5 VICARIOUS LIABILITY The financial burden on the Catholic church of abuse claims is so great that it is now arguing that it should not be vicariously liable for the acts of priests. That was the preliminary issue in JGE v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another (2011) EWHC 2871 QB. The claimant alleged that she had been sexually abused and raped by a priest when resident at a children's home between 1970 and The home was operated by the first defendant. The preliminary issue to be determined was whether the second defendant (the diocese) could be vicariously liable for the wrongful acts of the priest, who was now deceased. The second defendant argued that he was not its employee and that vicarious liability could not attach to the relationship between them. In finding in favour of the claimant the High Court judge held that there was a two-stage test when examining whether one party could be vicariously liable for the acts of another. The first stage involved an inquiry into whether the relationship between the parties was one to which the principles of vicarious liability might attach. The second stage involved an inquiry into the acts in question and whether they were within the scope of the relationship. Although the preliminary issue concerned stage one and the second stage would be for the trial judge to decide, a synthesis of the two stages was required. There was a "close connection test" at both stages. At stage two, the close connection was between the tortious act and the purpose and nature of the employment or appointment. At stage one, the closeness of connection was between "the tortfeasor and the person against whom liability is sought". A relationship between employer and employee would clearly meet that test; however, other relationships would also qualify. The relationship between the priest and the second defendant was significantly different from a contract of employment. There was no real element of control or supervision, no wages and no formal contract. However, the priest was appointed by and on behalf of the second defendant to do its work, to undertake the ministry on its behalf for the benefit of the church. He had the second defendant's full authority to fulfil that role and was provided with premises, pulpit and clerical robes. He was directed into the community with that full authority and given free rein to act as a representative of the church. He had been trained and ordained for that purpose and had been handed immense power by the second defendant. It was the second defendant who appointed him to the position of trust which he allegedly abused. The fact that some of the features of a classic contract of employment were not present might have relevance in a different context but not to the question of whether, in justice, the second should be responsible for the tortious acts of the person appointed and authorised by them to act on their behalf. The priest's activities had been set in motion by the second defendant in pursuance of a relationship into which it had entered for its own benefit. It was its empowerment of the priest which materially increased the risk of sexual assault, the granting of the power to exploit and misuse the trust which the second defendant had granted to him. It was the second defendant who introduced the risk of wrongdoing. It could therefore be vicariously liable for the priest s wrongful acts. The nature and closeness of the relationship which was the test at stage one might be easier to recognise than to define. The court would look carefully at the full nature of the relationship, with all the surrounding facts and circumstances to be considered. Those would include many of the matters which were also relevant at stage two. The obvious overlapping was not surprising given the requirement for a judgment on a synthesis of the two stages. Each case would be fact-specific; the extent to which there was control, supervision, advice and support would be relevant but not determinative. The question for the courts would be whether on the facts it was just and fair for the defendant to be responsible for the acts of the tortfeasor following close scrutiny of: (a) the connection and relationship between the parties and; (b) the connection between the tortious act and the purpose of the relationship, employment or appointment. Comment Could this case have wider implications? Vicarious liability is often looked at in terms of the liability of an employer for an employee s actions. This case expressly states that other relationships would also qualify. Does this risk, for example, extending the liability of amateur teams/clubs for the actions of their players/members? PROCEDURE/INTERIM PAYMENT APPLICATION The case of Berry (Protected Party) v Ashtead Plant Hire Co Ltd and others (2011) EWCA Civ 1304 considered the issue of which of multiple defendants could be the claimant s target for an interim payment application and the grounds for successfully making such an application. The second defendant had promoted and organised an annual music festival. Accommodation units for the festival were supplied by the appellant third defendant. It arranged for the units to be delivered to the festival site by the first defendant. They were taken to the site by the first defendant's employee, the respondent/claimant, in a lorry with a mounted crane. While the claimant was delivering the units by operating the crane either the crane or the accommodation unit came into contact with a live overhead power cable. He was electrocuted and suffered severe injuries. He brought proceedings against the first, second and third defendants, alleging a failure to provide a safe system of work, negligence and breach of the Electricity at Work Regulations The first and third defendants were insured but the second defendant was not. The health and safety adviser and manager appointed by the second defendant for the festival was also joined in the proceedings as the fourth defendant and he was
3 Page 3 of 5 cont d insured. The claimant applied for an interim payment against the first, third and fourth defendants. The judge made orders against the first and third defendants on the basis that one or other of them would be found liable and both were insured so that the conditions in CPR 25.7(1)(e)(i)and 25.7(1)(e)(ii) were satisfied. On its appeal, the third defendant argued that CPR 25.7(1)(e) only applied if all the defendants were insured which was not the case since the second defendant, although not a defendant to the interim payment application, was uninsured. Secondly, it was quite possible that neither it nor the first defendant would be found liable, since responsibility for the accident was primarily that of the second defendant. In allowing the appeal the Court of Appeal held that the word "defendants" in CPR.25.7(1)(e)(i) and (ii) had to mean the defendants against whom an order for interim payment was sought. Thus, where a claimant applied for an interim payment against a number of defendants on the basis that one or another was liable and they were all insured, it did not matter that there was also another defendant who was not insured. The first and third defendants each said that the other was the claimant's employer for the purpose of performing the task of delivering the accommodation units to the festival site, but the court could not be satisfied, to the degree necessary to order an interim payment, that one or other would be liable in common law negligence or for failing to provide a safe place and system of work or under the 1989 Regulations. It was not obvious that either was in breach of a common law duty of care. The place where the accident happened was not under the control of either the first or third defendants and whether an employer had discharged his duty to take all reasonable steps to provide a safe place or safe system at a place which was not under his control required a fact-sensitive inquiry. The instant case was too fact sensitive for the court to be satisfied that either the first or third defendants would be found liable. The employer and the employee had a duty to comply with the Regulations so far as they related to matters within their control. The live cable was not within the control of the first or third defendants and it was arguable that the crane was more in the control of the claimant than the employer, whoever that was. The Regulations required work to be carried out in such a manner as not to give rise to danger, so far as was reasonably practicable. The words "so far as is reasonably practicable" brought in considerations comparable to common law negligence. The case on liability against the first and third defendants was not clear cut. PROCEDURE/INFANT SETTLEMENT The case of IB v CB (2010) EWHC 3815 (QB) looked at two important issues in relation to the approval of an infant settlement. First, in seeking the judge s approval for the settlement he had been sent counsel s opinion and copies of two reports prepared by a financial adviser. The defendant sought disclosure of the financial reports arguing that by sending them to the judge, the claimant had waived privilege. The defendant accepted that if the reports had been merely cited in counsel's opinion, then the question of waiver of privilege would not arise. Secondly the defendant sought amendments to the consent order that had been filed with the court. One of the proposed clauses of the consent order allowed the defendant to discharge the obligation to make periodical payments through an annuity provider. The defendant asked for an order requiring the claimant to undergo a medical examination in the future, in the light of the possible purchase of annuity. On the first point the judge held that if the defendant was right in relation to the financial adviser's reports, then any report of any description sent to a judge for the judge's assistance in deciding whether to approve a settlement would lose its privileged status. It was appropriate for the court to be fully advised and to know exactly why those advising the claimant had decided to recommend the acceptance of a particular offer. Those representing a claimant should not feel inhibited from presenting all relevant materials to the judge by a fear that sending a material report to the judge would cause it to lose its privileged status. There was something remarkable and unacceptable about the proposition that it would be perfectly alright for counsel to set out in his opinion a particular report in quotation marks, absolutely verbatim and in full, thus preserving the privilege of the report whereas that privilege would be sacrificed by the submission of the report itself. An expert's report sent to a judge, for the purposes already described, retained its privilege. On the second issue, the court was satisfied that the defendant's proposed clause concerning future medical examinations did not permit the insurers willynilly to seek to make the claimant undergo a medical examination. It was inserted for the sole purpose of obtaining a medical examination in the event that the insurers wished to purchase an annuity, as the proposed annuity provider would wish to have an up to date medical picture of the claimant. Its terms did not entitle the defendant to obtain medical reports for any other purpose. It was unlikely in practice that any medical examination under that clause would ever occur, but the remote possibility could not be ruled out, and it was appropriate to include the provision in the light of the defendant's option to discharge its obligations through an annuity provider.
4 Page 4 of 5 COSTS Although conditional fee agreements may now have a limited life expectancy the appeals in the cases of Germany v Flatman: Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Weddall (2011) EWHC 2945 (QB) are still of importance and are also examples of the courts making orders for non-party disclosure. The appellant defendants had both successfully defended claims brought against them by the claimant respondents and obtained costs orders. There was no real prospect of recovering those costs as the claimants were without funds. They were represented by the same solicitors under a conditional fee agreement, but without after the event insurance. If the claimant Flatman's claim had succeeded the solicitors would have claimed costs of over 41,000 when the outlay on disbursements was only 2,035. The defendants, who had the same insurers, suspected that the claims were funded by the solicitors to some extent and applied for disclosure orders regarding each claimant s funding arrangements to enable consideration of whether to apply for a third party costs order. Those applications were refused by the judge on the basis that such an application could undermine or destroy the workings of the CFA system, and because arguments of policy and principle were so strongly against the application that it was wholly improbable that the defendants would succeed in obtaining a third party costs order. The appellant Barchester Healthcare submitted that the judge had misdirected himself and set too high a threshold by requiring the defendants to show that a third party costs order would be made In allowing the appeal, the High Court judge hearing it held that there was a power under S51 Senior Courts Act 1981 to determine by whom the costs of litigation should be paid. Such an order could be extended to non-parties, such as solicitors, in appropriate circumstances. What was required was evidence to show that the solicitor had gone beyond the scope of a solicitor's ordinary role and had acted as a funder of litigation. Although orders against non-parties were to be regarded as exceptional, that meant outside the ordinary run of cases where parties pursued claims for their own benefit and at their own expense. The ultimate test was whether it was just in all the circumstances to make the order. A third party costs order could be made in circumstances where the funder was "a real party" not just "the real party". A solicitor would become a funder if he paid out sums on the basis that they would be recovered from the other side in the event of success, or not at all in the event of failure. A solicitor would then be providing funds in the way of business. Any funding role by a solicitor would only be countenanced if it carried with it the risk of having to pay the defendant's costs if he was ultimately successful. A disclosure order was necessary to establish what exactly had passed between a claimant and his solicitor. The judge had misdirected himself in over-estimating the consequences of the defendants applications for the daily workings of the CFA regime as a whole. He was unduly influenced by a public policy consideration that did not arise. The defendants were not seeking to establish that an order for third party costs should become the norm in CFA cases. They only sought to make the application if the solicitors were shown to have become a funder of litigation in the way of business. The appeals turned on their facts. There was sufficient material to justify ordering the disclosure of the information sought. Any future application for a third party costs order as a result would have to be considered on its merits. DATES FOR YOUR DIARY 24 January 2012 An audience with Professor Graham Beaumont Neuropsychologist, London 15 March 2012 Major Bodily Injury Group Spring Seminar The Wellcome Collection, London To express interest in attending any of these events please mail crm@greenwoods-solicitors.com Further information For further information on any of the issues dealt with in this Alert, other than where a contact has been provided, please contact Geoff Owen on T or E. gro@greenwoods-solicitors.com To subscribe or unsubscribe from this Alert, please crm@greenwoods-solicitors.com
5 Page 5 of 5 Seminars Greenwoods holds a series of training events for both our lawyers and interested clients. Below are those events being held in the next few months. If you would like to attend any of the following seminars please crm@greenwoods-solicitors.com, indicating which you are interested in attending. CONSTRUING & INTERPRETING INSURANCE POLICIES Date Time Location Speaker(s) 23 November Gracechurch Street Marion Smith London EC3V 0AS 39 Essex Street WITHOUT PREJUDICE NEGOTIATION OF SOLICITORS COSTS - DO S & DON TS Date Time Location Speaker(s) 8 December Gracechurch Street Peter Kirby London EC3V 0AS Hardwicke Other Greenwoods publications Greenwoods produces a number of regular publications on various topics, namely: PROPERTY, CONSTRUCTION & INSURANCE REVIEW (Monthly) MOTOR CRIME FOCUS (Quarterly) FRAUD REVIEW (Quarterly) H & S REVIEW (Quarterly) MARINE INSURANCE REVIEW (Quarterly) If you would like to subscribe to any of the above publications, please crm@greenwoods-solicitors.com, indicating which you would like to receive. The information and opinions contained in this document are not intended to be a comprehensive study, nor to provide legal advice, and should not be relied on or treated as a substitute for specific advice concerning individual situations. This document speaks as of its date and does not reflect any changes in law or practice after that date. Greenwoods is a firm of solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in England and Wales. You can access the rules which regulate our professional conduct at: Greenwoods Solicitors 2011
PERSONAL INJURY Alert
A weekly news bulletin from Greenwoods Issue 351: 9 May 2013 In this issue - Limitation - Provisional Damages - Costs - From within Greenwoods - A Caged Accident? Seminars - An Audience With... Bristol
More informationPROPERTY, CONSTRUCTION & INSURANCE Review
A monthly review of property & construction, insurance, commercial & financial risks Issue 77: November 2012 In this issue - Restriction of strict liability in fire cases - Subrogated recovery and deliberate
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd July 2014 Issue: 025 Part 36 As can be seen from the case of Supergroup Plc v Justenough Software Corp Inc [Lawtel 30/06/2014] Part 36 is still the subject of varying interpretations.
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 23rd July 2015 Issue: 071 Part 36 In the commercial claim of Dutton and others v Minards and others [Lawtel 20/07/2015] we have yet another case dealing with Part 36. Former
More informationMIB Uninsured Agreement
MIB Uninsured Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 3rd July 2015 between the SECRETARY OF STATE ( the Secretary of State ) and the MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU ( MIB ), whose registered office is for the time
More informationCosts Law Update Lamont v Burton
- The Defendant Costs Specialists Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton The Court of Appeal s decision last week in Lamont v Burton [2007] EWCA Civ 429 is likely to have serious costs implications for defendants
More information4. In Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2004] UKPC 39 Lord Brown clarified:
Third Party Costs Orders against Solicitors 1. This article discusses the rise in applications against solicitors for third party costs orders, where solicitors have acted on conditional fee agreements
More informationTEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance
TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance In return for the payment of the Premium specified in the Schedule and based on any Information that
More informationIN THE MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT No.2QT66034. 1 Bridge Street West Manchester M60 9DJ. Claimant. Defendant
1 0 1 0 1 IN THE MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT No.QT0 1 Bridge Street West Manchester M0 DJ 0 th November B e f o r e:- DISTRICT JUDGE MATHARU COMBINED SOLUTIONS UK Ltd. (Trading as Combined Parking Solutions)
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationwww.startrescue.co.uk 01
INTRODUCTION This policy summary provides key information about the Uninsured Loss Recovery Policy, which you should read. For full terms and conditions of the policy please refer to the policy document
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More information1) Uninsured Loss Recovery An event causing damage to the insured vehicle and/or personal property in or on it
MOTORING LEGAL SOLUTIONS MCE ASSIST THIS IS YOUR INSURANCE POLICY This policy is evidence of the contract between you and the Insurer. Following an Insured Event the Insurer will pay the Insured s Legal
More informationFIXED COSTS PART 45. Contents of this Part
FIXED COSTS PART 45 PART 45 Contents of this Part I FIXED COSTS Rule 45.1 Scope of this Section Rule 45.2 Amount of fixed commencement costs in a claim for the recovery of money or goods Rule 45.2A Amount
More informationConditional Fee Agreement ( CFA ) [For use in personal injury and clinical negligence cases only].
Disclaimer This model agreement is not a precedent for use with all clients and it will need to be adapted/modified depending on the individual clients circumstances and solicitors business models. In
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationCONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENTS GUIDANCE
Disclaimer In all cases solicitors must ensure that any agreement with a client is made in compliance with their professional duties, the requirements of the SRA and any statutory requirements depending
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationCHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
More informationLoan Car Legal Cover Terms and Conditions
Loan Car Legal Cover Terms and Conditions As a Loan Car Driver, you also benefit from legal expenses cover. Legal expenses cover pays the legal costs and expenses of any legal proceedings to recover uninsured
More informationNOTES FOR GUIDANCE MIB Uninsured Agreement (2015) 1 www.mib.org.uk
1 www.mib.org.uk NOTES FOR GUIDANCE MIB Uninsured Agreement (2015) Notes for Guidance MIB Uninsured Agreement (2015) The following notes are for the guidance of anyone who submits a claim to MIB under
More informationOctagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy
Octagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy 1 2 This Octagon insurance policy is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance SA and administered on their behalf by Arc Legal Assistance Limited. The following
More informationExpert evidence. A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition)
Expert evidence A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition) Addendum, June 2009 1. Introduction 1.1 The second edition of this Guide was published in October 2003, in order to set out
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1 Scope Paragraph
More informationMOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012
MOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS Introduction By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com The protocol for Low Value
More informationL.E. LAW INFORMATION SHEET NO. 11 GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
LE Law Services Ltd 127 High Road Loughton Essex IG10 4LT Telephone: 020 8508 4961 Facsimile: 020 8508 6359 www.lelaw.co.uk L.E. LAW INFORMATION SHEET NO. 11 GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS 1. Introduction
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury. February 2014 Issue 007
Legal Watch: Personal Injury February 2014 Issue 007 Civil Procedure/Compliance with Directions Almost every day brings more post Jackson/Mitchell cases. Although these are non-personal injury cases we
More informationMotor Legal Expenses Insurance
Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Policy Document Certificate of Insurance This insurance is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance SA and managed on their behalf by Arc Legal
More informationOctagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy
Octagon Insurance Legal Expenses Policy This insurance has been arranged and is administered by Carpenters Solicitors. It is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance S.A, and managed on their behalf by
More informationPg. 01 French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP
Contents French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP 1 Excelerate Technology Limited v Cumberbatch and Others 3 Downing v Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 5 Yeo v Times Newspapers Limited
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More information1.2 Analyse matters to be considered by the judge when awarding damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity
Title Damages, Settlement and Costs in Personal Injury Cases Level 4 Credit value 8 Learning outcomes The learner will: Assessment criteria The learner can: Knowledge, understanding and skills 1 Understand
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1 Scope Paragraph
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT
Province of Alberta MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter M-22 Current as of April 1, 2015 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 5th June 2014 Issue: 021 Civil Procedure/Service Of Claim Form There has been a run of cases relating to the service of claim forms and this continues with Kaki v National
More informationSUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG
LC Paper No. CB(2)517/05-06(01) SUBMISSION OF THE LAW SOCIETY S WORKING PARTY TO THE LEGCO LEGAL AFFAIRS PANEL REGARDING THE OPERATIONS OF RECOVERY AGENTS IN HONG KONG 1. This is a submission of the Recovery
More informationMOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND
MOTOR INSURER S BUREAU OF IRELAND COMPENSATION OF UNINSURED ROAD ACCIDENT VICTIMS Agreement dated 29th January 2009 between the Minister for Transport and the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland (MIBI) AGREEMENT
More informationYour Van Insurance Motor Legal Protection Policy Booklet
Your Van Insurance Motor Legal Protection Policy Booklet Contents Motor Legal Protection Insurance...3 Motor Legal Expenses...3 Helpline Services...3 Motor Legal Expenses Policy Summary...4 Cancellation
More informationConditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
More informationDRAFT MOTOR TRAFFIC (THIRD- PARTY INSURANCE) (COST RECOVERY) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS
STATES OF JERSEY r DRAFT MOTOR TRAFFIC (THIRD- PARTY INSURANCE) (COST RECOVERY) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 201- Lodged au Greffe on 13th December 2012 by the Minister for Health and Social Services STATES GREFFE
More informationRE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants
More informationTHIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20. THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called Law Aid )
THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20 B E T W E E N: THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called Law Aid ) AND [SOLICITOR FIRM] of [address] (hereinafter called the
More informationCIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT
Introduction CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE IMPACT OF THE JACKSON REFORMS ON COSTS AND CASE MANAGEMENT Submission by the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) March 2014 1. This response is prepared on behalf
More informationOpen, Calderbank and Part 36 offers considerations and tactics
Open, Calderbank and Part 36 offers considerations and tactics PJ Kirby QC 1. Introduction 1.1 In detailed assessment proceedings there will, as in all disputes, be advantages in settling the matter in
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 15th January 2015 Issue: 047 Public liability The difference between a local authority s powers and its duties was examined in Foulds (Deceased) v Devon County Council [Lawtel
More informationYour Motor Legal Protection Insurance Policy Wording
Your Motor Legal Protection Insurance Policy Wording www.debenhamscarinsurance.co.uk Contents Your Motor Legal Protection Insurance Policy Wording... 3 General Exceptions... 10 2 Your Motor Legal Protection
More informationBefore : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE TUGENDHAT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 3279 (QB) Case No: HQ09X03020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 20/11/2012 Before : THE HONOURABLE
More informationMinistry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation
Ministry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation Question 1: Do you agree that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 7.1A(1) and
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL
PERSONAL INJURIES BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR USE AFTER 31 JANUARY 2013 PLEASE NOTE: THESE TERMS
More informationTHE MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU OF SINGAPORE
456 Singapore Academy of Law Journal (1998) THE MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU OF SINGAPORE WHAT IS AN MIB AND WHAT IS ITS ROLE? To appreciate this it will be useful to take a look at the first Motor Insurers Bureau
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1 Scope Paragraph
More informationPERSONAL INJURY Alert
A weekly news bulletin from Greenwoods Issue 373: 6 November 2013 In this issue - Civil Procedure/Extensions of Time CIVIL PROCEDURE/EXTENSIONS OF TIME - Civil Procedure/Expert Evidence - Civil Procedure/Expert
More information2.2.2 Adversely affect another party s case; or
LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE COMMUNICATIONS: A PRACTICAL OVERVIEW FOR LOSS ADJUSTERS ELSPETH OWENS, 4 PUMP COURT Introduction 1. The application of Legal Professional Privilege to
More informationKnowhow briefs Without Prejudice
Knowhow briefs Without Prejudice Executive Summary: Without Prejudice ( WP ) communications made in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute may not be used in court as evidence of an admission. WP communications
More informationLEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS
LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS These Regulations came into force on 1 July 2014. 1 Introduction 1.1 These Regulations govern the Union s legal Scheme. The Rules of the Union set out your other rights and entitlements.
More informationPERSONAL INJURY Alert
A weekly news bulletin from Greenwoods Issue 315: 20 June 2012 In this issue - Liability/RTA - Excluded liability/s151(4) road traffic Act 1988 - Limitation/issuing a claim form - From within Greenwoods
More informationProfessional Indemnity Insurance Policy - Optometrists Association Australia (OAA) Version 3.0
Version 3.0 Table of contents Table of contents 2 Special Notices 3 Policy wording 4 Introduction 4 How much we will pay 4 What we insure 4 1. Professional indemnity insurance cover 4 1.1 Practice of your
More informationClinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SENIOR COURTS COST OFFICE Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL ------------------- AMH.
Case No: HQ13X05225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SENIOR COURTS COST OFFICE Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Wednesday, 28 January 2015 BEFORE: MASTER LEONARD BETWEEN: AMH - and - THE SCOUT
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 19, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.
More informationShort Form CFA based on "APIL/PIBA 9" for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims from 1.10.2013
LAMB CHAMBERS SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 October 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse
More informationMotor Legal Care Terms and Conditions
Motor Legal Care Terms and Conditions The cover provided under this notice is in addition to your Breakdown cover and should be read together with your existing terms and conditions. RAC Motor Legal Care
More informationRULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
More informationINSURANCE CONTRACTS ACT CHANGES
16 July 2014 INSURANCE CONTRACTS ACT CHANGES Geoffrey Hancy Barrister Mezzanine Level, 28 The Esplanade, Perth 6000 geoff@hancy.net www.hancy.net Introduction 1 The Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) (the
More informationGUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM
GUIDE TO FUNDING YOUR MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIM Because of the expert knowledge and depth of investigation required in order to bring a successful claim, negligence litigation can be expensive. Understandably,
More informationPre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents
http://websvr/textimagecreator (Text image creator to change heading) Pre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph
More informationCHAPTER 103 MOTOR VEHICLES (THIRD PARTY INSURANCE) ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 103 MOTOR VEHICLES (THIRD PARTY INSURANCE) ORDINANCE Non-authoritative Consolidated Text This is not an authoritative revised edition for the purposes of the Revised Edition of the Laws Ordinance;
More informationConditional Fee Agreement (CFA)
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) This agreement is a binding legal contract between you and your solicitor/s. Before you sign, please read everything carefully. This agreement must be read in conjunction
More informationCourt of Protection Note. The Court of Protection and Personal Injury Claims. Simon Edwards
Court of Protection Note The Court of Protection and Personal Injury Claims Simon Edwards 1. What happens when P brings proceedings for damages for personal injuries, those injuries being, substantially,
More informationTHIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20. THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called
1 THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20 B E T W E E N: THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called Law Aid ) AND [NAME OF SOLICITOR FIRM] of [STREET ADDRESS OF FIRM]
More informationROAD TRAFFIC AGREEMENT FOR COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS OF UNINSURED DRIVERS
Government Circular No. 45/01 ROAD TRAFFIC AGREEMENT FOR COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS OF UNINSURED DRIVERS frif\ tr-n On 6th August 2001 an Agreement was entered into between the Department of Transport and
More informationEmployers Liability Section
Employers Liability Section Definitions 1 lnjury Bodily injury, death, disease, illness, mental injury, mental anguish or nervous shock 2 Employee A B Any person under a contract of service or apprenticeship
More informationPreliminary Considerations. This chapter will enable you to achieve the following learning outcomes from the CILEx syllabus:
Chapter 2: Preliminary Considerations Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Limitation 2.3 Calculating limitation periods 2.4 Viability 2.5 Financing litigation 2.6 Summary Aims of this Chapter This chapter will
More informationConditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond!
Conditional Fee Arrangements, After the Event Insurance and beyond! CFAs, ATEs, DBAs Let s de-mystify the acronyms! 1. Conditional Fee Arrangements 1.1. What is a Conditional Fee Arrangement A conditional
More informationPankhurst v White and MIB grotesque fee arrangements both sides paid the cost
Court of Appeal warning about no win no fee agreements Pankhurst v White and MIB grotesque fee arrangements both sides paid the cost On the 15 th December 2010, the Court of Appeal fired a warning shot
More informationMotor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) CAP. 103 1
Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) CAP. 103 1 MOTOR VEHICLES (THIRD PARTY INSURANCE) ORDINANCE () Applied to Ascension by Ord. 3 of 1962 Amended in its application to Ascension by Ords. A2 of 1985
More informationMOTOR LEGAL EXPENSES POLICY WORDING TERMS OF COVER
Motor Legal Expenses provides:- 24/7 Legal Advice Insurance for legal costs for certain types of disputes HELPLINE SERVICES Legal Helpline MOTOR LEGAL EXPENSES Use the 24 hour advisory service for telephone
More informationAPIL/PIBA CFA version 9, for personal injuries and clinical negligence claims, from 1.4.13,
SHORT FORM CFA for use BETWEEN SOLICITORS AND COUNSEL on or after 1 April 2013 in personal injuries and clinical negligence claims (This agreement is not suitable for claims for diffuse mesothelioma.)
More informationBefore: HIS HONOUR JUDGE P. GREGORY -------------- LIAQAT RAJA. and MR KANE DAY MOTOR INSURERS' BUREAU JUDGMENT ON APPEAL APPROVED ---------------
IN THE BIRKENHEAD COUNTY COURT Case No. 3YM66264 76 Hamilton Street Birkenhead CH41 5EN Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE P. GREGORY 2 March 2015 Between: -------------- LIAQAT RAJA and Claimant (Respondent) MR
More informationQBE European Operations Professional liability
QBE European Operations Professional liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited QBE Professional Liability Disclosure of insurance details revisited/november 2013 1 Disclosure of insurance details
More informationChapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid
Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES
More information- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BAKER. - and - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 2668 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION BEFORE: Case No: QB/2013/0325 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 31 July 2013 HIS HONOUR
More informationPERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002
1 PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS BILL 2002 EXPLANATORY NOTES General Outline Purpose of legislation The main purpose of this Act is to facilitate the ongoing affordability of insurance through appropriate
More informationEmployer s liability section. Policy document
Employer s liability section Policy document Contents Employers liability section 3 Meaning of Words 3 The Cover 4 Limit of liability 5 Extensions to the employers liability cover 6 2 Employers liability
More informationGuide to compensation claims against the police
Tel: 020 8492 2290 I N C O R P O R A T I N G D O N A L D G A L B R A I T H & C O Guide to compensation claims against the police This guide is designed to provide a general overview to bringing compensation
More informationQueensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002
Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 Act No. 24 of 2002 Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Short
More informationNSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET
NSW COURT OF APPEAL DECISION SUPPORTS LITIGATION FUNDING MARKET Introduction 1. The New South Wales Court of Appeal, in a unanimous Judgment on Thursday 31 March 2005, sent some clear messages to legal
More informationA brief guide to professional negligence claims
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
More informationFAMILY CLASSIC LEGAL PROTECTION & ADVICE KEY FACTS BROCHURE
FAMILY CLASSIC LEGAL PROTECTION & ADVICE KEY FACTS BROCHURE WHY YOU NEED DAS FAMILY CLASSIC STANDARD COVERS EMPLOYMENT COVER CONSUMER CONTRACT DISPUTES PERSONAL INJURY NEIGHBOUR PROBLEMS HM REVENUE & CUSTOMS
More informationAUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT
AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT I, the undersigned client, do hereby retain and employ the Law Offices Of Zarakhovich&Associates, Inc., and, specifically, attorney Mariya Zarakhovich,
More informationLegal Watch: Personal Injury
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd October 2014 Issue: 034 Causation/pre-existing condition The case of Reaney v University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust and another (2014) EWHC 3016 (QB) deals
More informationInsight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #2 11 February 2016 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Save the
More informationYour guide to making A MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU CLAIM. 1 Guide to making an MIB claim - Issue 5 (09.15)
Your guide to making A MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU CLAIM 1 Guide to making an MIB claim - Issue 5 (09.15) This booklet This booklet gives important information about the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) and making
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More informationPre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents
Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury Claims in Road Traffic Accidents PROTOCOLS I INTRODUCTION Definitions 1.1 In this Protocol (1) claim means a claim, prior to the start of proceedings,
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationLawCover. Professional Indemnity Insurance Policy 2009/2010 116693148 \ 0421663 \ AZO01
LawCover Professional Indemnity Insurance Policy 2009/2010 116693148 \ 0421663 \ AZO01 This Policy sets out the conditions on which we agree to insure you. When reading this Policy, please note the use
More informationMotor Legal Expenses Policy Wording
3478676865245-0000000 34545323455index,134545323456 34545323455persist,false34545323456 34545323455output_folder,/strata/clients/ukais/live/v53/exports 34545323455document_name,PREVIEW34545323456 34545323455printfile_path,/strata/clients/ukais/live/v53/exports/PREVIEW.ps34545323456
More information