1 NATIONAL RECOGNITION REPORT Preparation of School Psychologists Note: NCATE recognition of this program is dependent on the review of the program by representatives of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) and review of the unit by NCATE. The NASP approval decision was made independent of NCATE unit review. COVER PAGE Name of Institution Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Date of Review MM DD YYYY 02 / 01 / 2011 i This report is in response to a(n): Initial Review Revised Report Response to Conditions Report Program Covered by this Review School Psychology Program Type Other School Professionals i Award or Degree Level(s) Master's Post Master's Specialist or C.A.S. Doctorate PART A - RECOGNITION DECISION i A1. SPA Decision on NCATE recognition of the program: Nationally recognized Nationally recognized with conditions Further development required OR Nationally recognized with probation OR Not nationally recognized [See Part G] A2. Test Results (from information supplied in Assessment #1, if applicable)
2 The program meets or exceeds an 80% pass rate on state licensure exams: Yes i No Not applicable Not able to determine A program pass rate of at least 85% was noted. A3. Summary of Strengths: The program includes many strengths. First of all, the program provides candidates comprehensive information on policy and procedures in the Student Handbook, Practicum Handbook, and Internship Handbook. As indicated in the previous review, the program has developed a wide range of assessments, including performance-based measures, to evaluate candidate knowledge, skills, and dispositions across the three years of training. Revisions in the Internship Evaluation Form support a more in-depth assessment of skills across the NASP Domains/Elements. A particular strength is noted in the requirement for candidates to conduct case studies, evaluate positive impact on student learning, and orally defend case studies in front of faculty. PART B - STATUS OF MEETING SPA STANDARDS Standard 1. PROGRAM CONTEXT/STRUCTURE School psychology training is delivered within a context of program values and clearly articulated training philosophy/mission, goals, and objectives. Training includes a comprehensive, integrated program of study delivered by qualified faculty, as well as substantial supervised field experiences necessary for the preparation of competent school psychologists whose services positively impact children, youth, families, and other consumers. DOMAINS OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY TRAINING AND PRACTICE School psychology candidates demonstrate entry-level competency in each of the following domains of professional practice. Competency requires both knowledge and skills. School psychology programs ensure that candidates have a foundation in the knowledge base for psychology and education, including theories, models, empirical findings, and techniques in each domain. School psychology programs ensure that candidates demonstrate the professional skills necessary to deliver effective services that result in positive outcomes in each domain. The domains below are not mutually exclusive and should be fully integrated into graduate level curricula, practica, and internship Mission, goals, objectives; integrated and sequential program of studies in school psychology i The Program Handbook provides ample information as to the mission, goals, and objectives of the program as well as their relationship to NASP domains/elements, demonstrating policy documentation.
3 The program includes a sequence of course offerings for the 75-credit hour degree. The sequence includes 10 on-line courses. Practice documentation is evident in candidate transcripts. Candidates show consistency in preparation albeit not identical to the program of study outlined in the Program Handbook. For example, not all candidates enrolled in READ 706 and other candidates enrolled in SPED 780, SPED 628 and SPED 730, although not required by the program. There was no indication in the narrative why these differences between transcripts and program of study are shown Program commitment to human diversity throughout all aspects of the program i The program integrates respect for diversity in its mission. In addition, a course on social, cultural and biological bases of behavior is also required. Little ethnic and gender diversity is seen among candidates although the program compares their numbers to the state s population. Further the program outlines the manner in which candidates are exposed to a diverse K-12 student population and assessments require evaluation of skills in working with diverse populations, including ethnic, ability, etc. Faculty ethnic diversity is also limited. The program embeds diversity issues in various courses Candidate affiliation with colleagues/faculty/the profession through full-time residency or alternative planned experiences i The transcripts submitted show that candidates complete the program through a full-time experience. The Program Handbook did not include language that shows that candidates can complete the program on a part-time basis but that they must complete the program in three years Faculty requirements/credentials i The program includes two faculty with doctoral degrees and specialty in school psychology; however, the third FTE is comprised of individuals from two departments including one where the school psychology program is housed, who provide support through teaching and oral comprehensive exams. While the criteria allow for the third individual to be from a closely related field or a combination of professionals, this individual or individuals need to be involved in the full administration of the program. For example, in addition to teaching and participating in comprehensive exams, faculty members are expected to advise, assist with program improvement and candidate evaluation to name a few. The description provided does not indicate that all faculty are fully engaged Continuing professional development opportunities i
4 Program faculty need to be commended for their research and presentations at state and national conferences. Additionally, one faculty appears to also be involved in district professional development. REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIALIST LEVEL PROGRAMS ONLY 1.6. Minimum years of study/credit hour requirement (3 years/60 hours with 54 hours exclusive of internship); institutional documentation of program completion i The program of study and transcripts clearly demonstrate that the program meets this element Minimum internship requirement (1 year/1200 clock hours) i The Handbook specifies that all candidates must complete at least 1200 clock hours of internship. All interns are engaged in at least the minimum number of 1200 clock hours, as indicated on the Internship Summary Form. REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTORAL LEVEL PROGRAMS ONLY 1.8. Greater depth of study in multiple domains Not Applicable 1.9. Minimum years of study/credit hour requirement (4 years/90 hours with 78 hours exclusive of internship and dissertation); institutional documentation of program completion Not Applicable Minimum internship requirement (1 year/1500 clock hours)
5 Not Applicable Standard 2. Domains of School Psychology Training and Practice. General comments: Insert general comments that may be relevant for a number of domains. NOTE: For each domain below, provide specific comments labeled as ADDRESSED, ASSESSED, and ATTAINED to explain the basis for any standards judged to be. Assessment 1 (state or national exam): The program requires the Praxis II exam and data show at least an 85% passing rate. Data provided indicated that candidates meet the NCSP cut-off score of 165. Only one person in each of the three sets of cohort data presented did not meet the cut-off score. The subtest scores show that candidates are earning scores in the 50% range, in all Praxis versions except version C. Candidates scored below the 50% range in Applied Educational Foundations, Prevention and Intervention and Applied Psychological Foundations. Assessment 2 (Content Knowledge course embedded assessment): The tool for assessment 2 is a written comprehensive examination administered toward the end of internship and includes 11 questions based and linked to all NASP elements. The scoring rubric rates questions as Acceptable (A), Revise (R), or Acceptable with minor revisions (AR) by one primary faculty and the second faculty only after candidate revisions. The program should consider adopting a policy whereby both faculty independently rate the responses in order to ensure validity and reliability of this measure. Data provided were disaggregated by candidate and shows that out of 9 candidates only one was required to revise questions (three) in the 2010 cohort. However, more variability was shown among the two other cohorts: 2 out of 8 candidates in the 2009 cohort and 7 out of 11 of the 2008 cohort earned ratings of only A. Assessment 3 (practicum Professional knowledge, skills and dispositions): The program administers two practicum evaluations, one in APSY 725 and the other in APSY 735. The practicum evaluation form includes sections that are linked to all NASP elements except 2.3, 2.6, and 2.9. The scoring rubric is based on a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (competence is lacking and problems exist) to 5 (competence is much above expectations). Candidates can also receive ratings of Not Applicable (NA) when there is insufficient opportunity to demonstrate the skills. Data show that candidate cohorts earned ratings of at least 3. The range was from 3 to 5 with the majority lying in the 4 to 5 range. Assessment 4 (internship evaluation pedagogical and professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions): The program indicated that the internship evaluation is the only assessment changed in the last three years. The program added additional items to the original number of 21 to respond to the NASP Program Approval Board suggestion that depth and breadth be added. The program is commended for making improvements. As a result, the evaluation now consists of 36 items across all 11 NASP elements and includes a more in-depth analysis of candidate skills across elements. The internship evaluation is administered at 5, 10, 20, and 40 weeks to serve as a formative evaluation tool. The evaluation uses a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Competence in need of further training) to 5 (Competence is very well developed). Ratings of ND (no data) are also possible. Data show that interns received ratings ranging from 4 to 5 among the 2008 and 2010 cohorts, while candidates in the 2009 cohort received ratings ranging from 3 to 5. Overall, the 2010 cohort appears to have received the highest ratings in all areas and demonstrate that interns are demonstrating well-developed skills in all NASP elements.
6 Assessment 5 (Performance based assessment evaluated by faculty during internship): The program uses the case study as assessment 5 and requires interns to complete three case studies during internship for evaluation by faculty (one each with an academic goal, behavioral goal and systems goal) during an oral exam. The program uses the NCSP rubric Liker-type scale (V-very effective, E- effective, and N-Needs development) to evaluate the case studies. The case studies are linked to five of the 11 NASP elements: 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 2.9 and Ratings show that the majority of candidates earned ratings of Very Effective or Effective. Assessment 6 (Effect on student learning): Both a quantitative and qualitative method is used to demonstrate impact on student learning. For the qualitative component the program added a question to the intern evaluation that asks supervisors to rate the extent to which interns presence has helped families and other consumers. The case studies used for Assessment 5 are also used to demonstrate impact on student learning from a more quantitative approach. Assessment 6 was linked with all NASP elements except 2.5, 2.7, and The program incorporates percent of non-overlapping data (PND) points. The results yielded effective and very effective outcomes. All program assessments show evidence that elements were assessed and attained Data-Based Decision-Making and Accountability: School psychologists have knowledge of varied models and methods of assessment that yield information useful in identifying strengths and needs, in understanding problems, and in measuring progress and accomplishments. School psychologists use such models and methods as part of a systematic process to collect data and other information, translate assessment results into empirically-based decisions about service delivery, and evaluate the outcomes of services. Data-based decision-making permeates every aspect of professional practice. i Addressed: The program lists several courses that address this element. Although the courses address more traditional assessment practices, the program does integrate informal approaches to data-baseddecision making particularly in APSY 722 and APSY 724. Standard 2.2. Consultation and Collaboration. School psychologists have knowledge of behavioral, mental health, collaborative, and/or other consultation models and methods and of their application to particular situations. School psychologists collaborate effectively with others in planning and decision-making processes at the individual, group, and system levels. i Addressed: This domain is addressed in a course dedicated to consultation approaches.
7 It should be noted that the Student Handbook listed several courses as on-line course offerings. The Collaborative Consultation course (APSY625) is listed as one of these on-line courses. A review of the syllabus, however, did not indicate that this was an on-line course. It is recommended that the program amend these inconsistencies. Standard 2.3. Effective Instruction and Development of Cognitive/Academic Skills. School psychologists have knowledge of human learning processes, techniques to assess these processes, and direct and indirect services applicable to the development of cognitive and academic skills. School psychologists, in collaboration with others, develop appropriate cognitive and academic goals for students with different abilities, disabilities, strengths, and needs; implement interventions to achieve those goals; and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Such interventions include, but are not limited to, instructional interventions and consultation. i Addressed: The program requires a course in learning theories that serves as the foundational course to meet this element. Two other courses support these efforts as well. Standard 2.4. Socialization and Development of Life Skills. School psychologists have knowledge of human developmental processes, techniques to assess these processes, and direct and indirect services applicable to the development of behavioral, affective, adaptive, and social skills. School psychologists, in collaboration with others, develop appropriate behavioral, affective, adaptive, and social goals for students of varying abilities, disabilities, strengths, and needs; implement interventions to achieve those goals; and evaluate the effectiveness limited to, consultation, behavioral assessment/intervention, and counseling. i Addressed: This element is addressed in the courses listed. Standard 2.5. Student Diversity in Development and Learning. School psychologists have knowledge of individual differences, abilities, and disabilities and of the potential influence of biological, social, cultural, ethnic, experiential, socioeconomic, gender-related, and linguistic factors in development and learning. School psychologists demonstrate the sensitivity and skills needed to work with individuals of diverse characteristics and to implement strategies selected and/or adapted based on individual characteristics, strengths, and needs.
8 i Addressed: The program addresses this element in the course, Cultural, Social and Biological Bases of Personality Development. In addition, topics are infused in several other courses. Standard 2.6. School and Systems Organization, Policy Development, and Climate. School psychologists have knowledge of general education, special education, and other educational and related services. They understand schools and other settings as systems. School psychologists work with individuals and groups to facilitate policies and practices that create and maintain safe, supportive, and effective learning environments for children and others. i Addressed: This domain is addressed. Standard 2.7. Prevention, Crisis Intervention, and Mental Health. School psychologists have knowledge of human development and psychopathology and of associated biological, cultural, and social influences on human behavior. School psychologists provide or contribute to prevention and intervention programs that promote the mental health and physical well-being of students. i Addressed: The program demonstrates strength in addressing this domain. Candidates enroll in a course focused on counseling and interviewing as well as a course the directly addresses crisis intervention and prevention. It must be noted, however, that the Student Handbook course sequence lists this course as an on-line course. An on-line teaching method may be problematic for a course such as this. It should also be noted that the course syllabus did not indicate this as an on-line course. Standard 2.8. Home/School Community Collaboration. School psychologists have knowledge of family systems, including family strengths and influences on student development, learning, and behavior, and of methods to involve families in education and service delivery. School psychologists work effectively with families, educators, and others in the community to promote and provide comprehensive services to children and families.
9 i Addressed: The courses listed as addressing this domain show strength in working with families. Consultation skills are addressed with families. Lacking is the link to the community in order to provide a more comprehensive service to children and families. Standard 2.9. Research and Program Evaluation. School psychologists have knowledge of research, statistics, and evaluation methods. School psychologists evaluate research, translate research into practice, and understand research design and statistics in sufficient depth to plan and conduct investigations and program evaluations for improvement of services. i Addressed: The program provides candidates with several courses that address this domain (i.e., Statistics in Education, Research in Education, and Research in Education II). Candidates learn about a variety of research methods, with particular emphasis on behavioral methodology. In addition, candidates conduct a single-subject design research project under faculty supervision. It was not clear where program evaluation methods were addressed in the program curriculum. Standard School Psychology Practice and Development. School psychologists have knowledge of the history and foundations of their profession; of various service models and methods; of public policy development applicable to services to children and families; and of ethical, professional, and legal standards. School psychologists practice in ways that are consistent with applicable standards, are involved in their profession, and have the knowledge and skills needed to acquire career-long professional development. i Addressed: This element is addressed in courses listed. Standard Information Technology. School psychologists have knowledge of information sources and technology relevant to their work. School psychologists access, evaluate, and utilize information sources and technology in ways that safeguard or enhance the quality of services. i Addressed: This element is addressed in course listed. The program is encouraged to consider how to enhance information technology skills with regard to application to special populations. For example, assistive technology would be the next level of addressing this element.
10 Standard 3. Field Experiences/Internship. School psychology candidates have the opportunities to demonstrate, under conditions of appropriate supervision, their ability to apply their knowledge, to develop specific skills needed for effective school psychological service delivery, and to integrate competencies that address the domains of professional preparation and practice outlined in these standards and the goals and objectives of their training program Practica and internships are completed for academic credit; practica include the development/evaluation of specific skills; practica are distinct from and precede culminating internship; internship requires integration/application of full range of competencies/domains. i Candidates earn credit for both practicums and internship. Practicums occur before internship Internship is a collaboration between institution and field site, includes activities consistent with program goals, and has a written plan specifying responsibilities. i The program provides contracts in the internship handbook. Interns are expected to engage in various activities and these are specified in a written plan Internship is completed on full-time basis over one year or half-time over two consecutive years; at least 600 hours in a school setting. i The transcripts submitted demonstrate that interns complete the internship in one year. The program also allows interns to complete the internship on a half time basis Interns an receive average of two hours of field-based supervision per week from credentialed school psychologist or, for non-school settings, credentialed psychologist. i Attachment G shows that interns meet this element.
11 3.5. Provision of appropriate support for the internship experience i The internship contract outlines responsibilities for the internship site, the intern, and the university. As such, the program provides interns the appropriate support for them. Standard 4. Performance-based Program Assessment and Accountability. School psychology training programs employ systematic, valid evaluation of candidates, coursework, practica, internship, faculty, supervisors, and resources and use the resulting information to monitor and improve program quality. A key aspect of program accountability is the assessment of the knowledge and capabilities of school psychology candidates and of the positive impact that interns and graduates have on services to children, youth, families, and other consumers Systematic, valid procedures used to evaluate and improve the quality of the program i The program outlines measures used to improve program quality. Many of the changes outlined were already noted in this submission and strengthened the program s submission The program applies published criteria for assessment and admission at each level and for candidate retention and progression. Criteria address academic/professional competencies and professional work characteristics. i The program publishes admission criteria and policies and procedures for progress monitoring. The program is commended for seeking ways to support their candidates (i.e., discussion with donors to change the criteria for the school psychology scholarship). Redirecting the funds to assist in the admissions process increased the program s pool of applicants The program employs a systematic, valid process to ensure that all candidates are able to integrate domains of knowledge and apply professional skills in delivering services evidenced by measurable positive impact on children, youth, families, and other consumers. i The program s use of the case study and evaluation for effects using a PND approach is a strength. In addition, the effects shown demonstrated their candidates have an effective or very effective positive impact on student learning.
12 PART C - EVALUATION OF PROGRAM REPORT EVIDENCE C.1. Candidates knowledge of content Candidates are achieving high scores on the Praxis II exam. Data on Assessment 2 also show that candidates demonstrate content knowledge. The comprehensive exam data shows that few candidates are required to revise the answer to their questions. The questions are aligned to all NASP elements, demonstrating knowledge across all knowledge areas. C.2. Candidates ability to understand and apply pedagogical and professional content knowledge, skills, and dispositions Candidates are demonstrating skill in applying pedagogical and professional content knowledge, skills in dispositions as shown in the data presented on the practicum evaluation, internship evaluation, and case study requirement. When combined, candidates show appropriate competencies across all NASP elements. Of strength is the case study; candidates are required to complete three, one each in academics, behavior, and systems during internship. C.3. Candidate effects on P-12 student learning Case studies are evaluated for positive impact on student learning using percent non-overlapping data points. Both academic and behavioral goals are incorporated and data show that candidates are effective or very effective in the services provided to PK-12 students and other consumers. PART D - EVALUATION OF THE USE OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS Evidence that assessment results are evaluated and applied to the improvement of candidate performance and strengthening of the program (as discussed in Section V of the program report) The program integrates a systematic system to make improvements to the program. The program appears to make use of all data gathered on candidate progress, informal comments, results of Praxis exam, and comments from sites the candidates serve. PART E - AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION LEAVE BLANK PART F - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS F.1. Comments on Section I (Context) and other topics not covered in Parts B-E: The course sequence in the Handbook includes 10 courses that are offered on-line. However, an examination of course syllabi did not clearly indicate that many of these courses were on-line courses. The program is encouraged to clearly specify on the syllabus if the course is an on-line course. In addition, the program should also provide the most recent syllabi for each course. For instance, spring course syllabi presented were most often Spring 2009 syllabi rather than Spring NASP and NCATE are working together to ensure that the timelines for NASP reports are consistent with the timelines for NCATE unit visits. Edinboro's next NCATE visit is in Spring Since the
13 NASP report was submitted and approved within 3 years of the NCATE visit, this decision and report can be used as evidence for the 2013 visit. In order to ensure that the next NASP submission is aligned with unit timelines, the next NASP submission must be submitted in Spring This will continue to ensure that the NASP reports are submitted within 3 years of NCATE visits. F.2. Concerns for possible follow-up by the Board of Examiners: PART G - DECISIONS i Please select final decision: Program is nationally recognized. The program is recognized through the semester and year of the institution's next NCATE accreditation decision in 5-7 years. To retain recognition, another program report must be submitted before that review. The program will be listed as nationally recognized through the semester of the next NCATE accreditation decision on websites and/or other publications of the SPA and NCATE. The institution may designate its program as nationally recognized by NCATE, through the semester of the next NCATE accreditation decision, in its published materials. National recognition is dependent upon NCATE accreditation. Please note that once a program has been nationally recognized, it may not submit a revised report addressing any unmet standards or other concerns. Please click "Next" This is the end of the report. Please click "Next" to proceed.
NATIONAL RECOGNITION REPORT Preparation of School Psychologists Note: NCATE recognition of this program is dependent on the review of the program by representatives of the National Association of School
Program Report for the Preparation of School Psychologists National Association of School Psychologists(NASP) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION COVER SHEET 1. Institution Name Arkansas
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS STANDARDS FOR TRAINING AND FIELD PLACEMENT PROGRAMS IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY The mission of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) is to promote
Standards for the Credentialing of School Psychologists 2010 INTRODUCTION The mission of the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) is to represent school psychology and support school psychologists
COVER SHEET Program Report for the Preparation of School Psychologists National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Option A NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION 1. Institution
Western Carolina University Program Assessment Plan Program: School Psychology College of Education and Allied Professions Assessment Plan for 2006-2007 Primary Contact: Candace H. Boan, Ph.D. Associate
Internship in School Psychology (PSY 790) Fall 2014 3 credits Instructor: Jennifer L. Schroeder, PhD Email: Jennifer.Schroeder@tamuc.edu (best way to contact me) Phone: 903-886-5200 Course description:
GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATION AND SUPERVISION OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Louisiana Department of Education Cecil J. Picard, Superintendent April 1, 2001 Louisiana State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK 2010 EDITION  Contents SECTION 1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION... 4 Training Philosophy... 5 School of Education and Allied Professions Outcome Goals... 6 National Association of School
Brooklyn College of the City University of New York Department of School Psychology, Counseling and Leadership School Psychologist Graduate Program Room 1107 James Hall 2900 Bedford Avenue Brooklyn, New
Type of License/Certificate Site ESS Administrator Name The Aurora Public Schools (APS) Induction Program is designed to assist school psychologists in meeting the Colorado Department of Education Colorado
CTC-School Psychology and National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Standards Crosswalk Professional Services Division April 2014 Overview of this Report This agenda item reports on an alignment
+ Education Specialist (Ed.S.) Program School Psychology CECH 2014 Primary Faculty: Renee Hawkins 556-3342 Renee.email@example.com I. Program Overview The Specialist-Level (Ed.S.) School Psychology Program
Proposal for Education Specialist Degree (Ed.S.) in School Psychology Department of Education and Allied Studies John Carroll University I. Purpose of the Proposed Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) Degree
Nationally Certified School Psychologist Application and Information for Graduates of Non-NASP-Approved Programs Note: All applications must be submitted using the online submission process. www.nasponline.org/certification/ncsp/app/index.aspx
Internship in School Psychology (PSY 790) Spring 2015 3 credits Instructor: Jennifer L. Schroeder, PhD Email: Jennifer.Schroeder@tamuc.edu (best way to contact me) Phone: 903-886-5200 Course description:
Outcomes Data School Psychology EdS Program Programs goals and their associated objectives of the program were designed to be consistent with our philosophy and the 2010 approved National Association of
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK 2014 EDITION Rev 5/16/14  Contents SECTION 1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION... 4 Training Philosophy... 5 School of Education and Health Science Professions Outcome Goals... 6 National
Therapeutic Psychology: Techniques of Counseling and Psychotherapy Psy 611 Spring 2015 Instructor: Gary L. Alderman, Ph.D. (firstname.lastname@example.org) 803-323-2637; 704-231-9970 (C) Kinard 110B Meeting time:
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK 2008 EDITION  Contents SECTION 1. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION... 4 Training Philosophy... 5 School of Education and Allied Professions Outcome Goals... 6 National Association of School
Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) 2007 Standards - Option A NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION
NATIONAL RECOGNITION REPORT Preparation of Educational Leaders School Building Level COVER PAGE Name of Institution University of Memphis, TN Date of Review MM DD YYYY 01 / 25 / 2008 i This report is in
Graduate Programs in Education and Human Development Department of Curriculum and Instruction Two master s degree options and a doctorate degree are offered in Curriculum and Instruction. The Master of
Psychology Department Plattsburgh State University MA/CAS in School Psychology Handbook: Policies and Procedures Fall, 2003 School Psychology Graduate Program Handbook [Policies and Procedures], p. 2 1
M.S. & Ed.S. in School Psychology Assessment in the Major Report 2013-14 By Dr. Christine Peterson, Program Director Submitted: October 2014 Table of Contents Description of Methods... 2 Program Disposition
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA Handbook of General Program Policies and Procedures ON-CAMPUS PROGRAM ONLY * For new students entering the on-campus program in 2015 School Psychology
Academic Program: Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology Graduate or Undergraduate: Graduate Date: October 10, 2003 Coordinator of the Program: Kenneth W. Sewell Person completing this form: Kenneth W.
Goals and Objectives of the School Psychology Program Graduates of the school psychology program are expected to develop a variety of critical, causal, interpretive, and reflective thinking skills during
Office of the Provost Ph.D. in School Psychology Academic Assessment Plan 2013-14 College of Education John Kranzler email@example.com University of Florida Institutional Assessment Continuous Quality
School Psychology Program Program Handbook This handbook provides information about the Specialist program in School Psychology at the University of Houston-Clear Lake. It is intended for use by potential
School Psychology Program Graduate Program Assessment Annual Report 2012 Submitted by: Sandra S. Stroebel, Ph.D. Program Director Associate Professor of School Psychology Graduate School of Education &
Seattle University College of Education SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INTERNSHIP HANDBOOK 2013 2014 Table of Contents Page 3 Section Introduction 4 I NATIONAL STANDARDS AND PROGRAM POLICIES AND PRACTICES 8 II INTERNSHIP
Rider University School Psychology Program Handbook Class of 2015 Rev. 1-17-13 1 Table of Contents Page Numbers School of Education Conceptual Framework 3-4 School Psychology Program Philosophy & Goals
1 Ed.S. PROGRAM IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY Manual of Policies and Procedures College of Education Department of Education and Human Services Lehigh University http://www.lehigh.edu/education/sp/eds_sp.html Approved:
RESOURCE GUIDE APSY795 INTERNSHIP IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Department of Special Education and School Psychology 08/13 Snyder 2 Table of Contents PROGRAM PHILOSOPHY 3 PREREQUISITES
Mississippi State University 1 Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations Department Head: Dr. David Morse Graduate Coordinator (COE): Dr. Charles Palmer Graduate Coordinator (EPY): Dr. Carlen
Page 1 of 16 UAF-UAA Joint PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology with Rural, Indigenous Emphasis Outcomes Assessment Goals,, and Benchmarks Mission The PhD Program in Clinical-Community Psychology
M.S. & Ed.S. in School Psychology Assessment in the Major Report 2014-15 By Dr. Christine Peterson, Program Director Submitted: October 2015 Table of Contents Description of Methods... 2 Program Disposition
NASP Program Review and Approval Enedina García Vázquez, PhD CAEP Conference Washington, DC September 18, 2015 PROGRAM ACCREDITATION BOARD Agenda Welcome Introductions Processes for completing online submissions
Re-specialization Loyola University Chicago Loyola University Re-specialization in Loyola University Chicago receives numerous requests from Doctoral Level Licensed Clinical Psychologists about obtaining
School Psychology Graduate Program Handbook Revised 09/2013 1 School Psychology Program Student Handbook Table of Contents Section I About the Program School Psychology Program Description Definition of
Educational Psychology Program School Psychology Specialization 2015 2016 DOCTORAL STUDENT HANDBOOK 1 Texas Tech University Table of Contents School Psychology in Texas... 3 Vision Statement and Specialization
School Psychology Program Annual Report 2008-2009 Applications/Admitted Students The following is a summary of program applications and admitted students. 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 # Applications
Psychology Psychology - Counseling Major Code: 3710 Degree: Master of Arts (M.A.) Department Psychology College Education & Professional Studies Program Coordinator/Advisor: Dr. Lorry Youll firstname.lastname@example.org
Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA) 2010 Standards Option A NOTE: This form uses the IRA standards approved by NCATE in 2010. Programs
School Psychology Area Requirements Graduate study in the School Psychology Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison is a degree program leading to a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Educational Psychology.
I. INTRODUCTION his manual includes pertinent information regarding requirements for practicum/field experience/internship in the School Psychology program. Be sure to read it over carefully as you are
RUTGERS SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM PRACTICUM HANDBOOK Introduction School Psychology is a general practice and health service provider specialty of professional psychology that is concerned with the science
APPLICATION PACKET School Psychology Program Department of Educational Administration and Psychological Services Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 78666 A Member of the Texas State University System
SPECIALIST-LEVEL PROGRAM IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY INFORMATION PACKET FOR PROSPECTIVE STUDENTS Updated: October 2013 College of Social Justice and Human Service Department of School Psychology, Higher Education
West Virginia University 1 Special Education Degrees Offered Master of Arts in Special Education Doctor of Education with a major in Special Education MASTER OF ARTS IN SPECIAL EDUCATION OVERVIEW The graduate
PROGRAM REPORT FOR THE PREPARATION OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERS (School Building Leadership Level) Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC) COVER SHEET
The Doctoral Program In School Psychology An APA-Accredited and NASP-Approved Program Program Handbook College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services School of Lifespan Development
School Psychology Prepared for the Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education EXECUTIVE SUMMARY by Andrea Canter National Association of School Psychologists June 2006 COPSSE Document No. IB-4E Center
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK Specialist in Education Degree in Psychology and Counseling with a concentration in School Psychology NASP Approved Conditional College of Education NASP Approved Conditional
2009-2010 ANNUAL PROGRAM REVIEW MS IN COUNSELING SCHOOL COUNSELING CONCENTRATION I. School Counseling Graduate Program The Counseling and Psychology faculty discuss course content and offer suggestions
National Association of School Psychologists Standards for Training and Field Placement Programs in School Psychology Standards for the Credentialing of School Psychologists The contents of this booklet
Azusa Pacific University 1 Master of Arts in Education: Educational Psychology (M.A.Ed.) and Educational Specialist (Ed.S.) Degree in School Psychology with Embedded Pupil Personnel Services Credential
Educational Psychology Program School Psychology Specialization 2014 2015 DOCTORAL STUDENT HANDBOOK 1 Texas Tech University Table of Contents School Psychology in Texas... 3 Vision Statement and Specialization
Valparaiso University School Psychology Program Student Handbook 2009-2010 Macintosh HD:Users:RLFJ:Documents:SchoolPsychology Handbook.09.doc Table of Contents Overview..3 Statement on Equality of Opportunity..3
102-1-12. Educational requirements. (a) Definitions. (1) ``Core faculty member'' means an individual who is part of the program's teaching staff and who meets the following conditions: (A) Is an individual
1 Program Review MA in Leadership Studies Graduate School of Education and Professional Development November 2012 MARSHALL UNIVERSITY Program Review 4 Program: MA in Leadership Studies College: Graduate
University of Northern Iowa School Psychology Program Internship Manual Revised August 2012 Table of Contents 1. Objectives & Purposes of Internship... 3 2. Registering for Internship... 3 3. The Internship
NEW PROGRAM PROPOSAL (FAST TRACK) EDUCATION SPECIALIST DEGREE: SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY Form B attached State the purpose of the program. Introduction The challenges faced by schools and school children, particularly
Council for Standards in Human Service Education National Standards ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICES http://www.cshse.org 2013 (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009) I. GENERAL PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS A. Institutional
School Psychology Program Student Handbook Educational Specialist in Psychology Department of Psychology California State University, Fresno Fall 2013 1 California State University, Fresno College of Science
A Career in School Psychology: Selecting a Master s, Specialist, or Doctoral Degree Program that Meets Your Needs If you are reading this fact sheet, congratulations! Selecting the right career is an important
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY School of Applied Health and Educational Psychology Doctorate in Educational Psychology Option: Counseling Psychology Overview The Counseling Psychology Program leading to the
Program Report for the Preparation of Elementary School Teachers Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION COVER SHEET 1. Institution
VOLUME 31, NUMBER 4, 2013 Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition Lisa Bertrand, EdD Professor and Program Coordinator Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling
Appendix A Components for the Review of Institutions of Higher Education Appendix A: Components for the Review of Institutions of Higher Education The PI 34 requirements for program approval are organized
Applied Behavior Analysis, M.S.Ed. 1 Applied Behavior Analysis, M.S.Ed. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION (http://education.temple.edu) About the Program The mission of the Master of Science in Education program in
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Human Development and Services MS in In keeping with the University s strategic commitment to excellence, each educational program
2015-2016 UHV SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM HANDBOOK For more information about UHV's School Psychology program, please contact Program Director, Dr. Elise Hendricker (email@example.com) UHV School of Arts
Advanced Seminar in School Psychology PSYC 625 Instructors: Dr. Joe Prus (firstname.lastname@example.org) 803-323-2630 Dr. Gary Alderman (email@example.com) 803-323-2630 Spring 2015 Tuesday 5:00-7:45 PM 016 Kinard
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY Professional Education Unit ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK 2011/2012 PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNIT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK Table of Contents The Unit Assessment System Overview...
CHAPTER 6 CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Section 1. Psychological Practitioner. (a) Certification Requirement. An individual must be certified with the Wyoming State Board of Psychology before practicing as
School Psychology PsyD Program Information for Applicants PROGRAM OVERVIEW William James College offers a doctoral degree (PsyD) in school psychology that prepares practitioners to assume leadership roles
School Psychology Handbook 2015-2016 Department of Psychology Francis Marion University 2 Francis Marion School Psychology Handbook ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document is the result of the efforts of a number
Alignment of NASP and CACREP Standards to California s Adopted Program Standards Professional Services Division January 2009 Overview of this Report This agenda item reports on an alignment study comparing
College of Social Justice and Human Service Graduate Programs The College of Social Justice and Human Service offers flexible programs leading to a range of master s, educational specialist, and doctoral
Discuss DIVERSITY AND PROFESSIONAL DISPOSITIONS 1 SECTION I CONTEXT Provide the following contextual information: 1. Description of any state or institutional policies that may influence the application
PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PSYCHOLOGY WITH A SPECIALIZATION IN SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY STUDENT HANDBOOK 2013-2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Program History 3
MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION Educational Leadership Technology Online www.hsu.edu The HSU Master of Science in Education (M.S.E.) in educational leadership and technology as well as building level leader