IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO * * * * *
|
|
|
- Avis May
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Greg J. Fuller Daniel S. Brown FULLER LAW OFFICES Attorneys at Law 161 Main Avenue West P. O. Box L Twin Falls, ID Telephone: (208) Facsimile : (208) ISB #1442 ISB #7538 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO * * * * * JOHN and JANE DOES 1-86, ) Case No. ) Plaintiffs, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR vs. ) INJUNCTIVE AND ) DECLARATORY RELIEF LAWRENCE WASDEN, Attorney General ) of the State of Idaho; KEVIN KEMPF, ) Director of the Idaho Department of ) Correction; HENRY ATENCIO, Chief ) Department of Correction Probation and ) Parole Division, SEXUAL OFFENDER ) MANAGEMENT BOARD and its ) members, SHANE EVANS, MICHAEL ) JOHNSTON, Ph.d., DOLLY BEDAL, ) JEFFREY BETTS, JON BURNHAM, ) JEAN FISHER, PAULA GARAY, ) SHERIFF CHARLES HUFF, KIMBERLY ) SIMMONS and CHRISTINA IVERSON, ) in their official capacities, COLONEL ) RALPH POWELL, Director, IDAHO ) STATE POLICE, TWIN FALLS COUNTY ) SHERIFF; ADA COUNTY SHERIFF; ) BONNEVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF; ) CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFF; JEROME )
2 COUNTY SHERIFF; BINGHAM ) COUNTY SHERIFF; FRANKLIN ) COUNTY SHERIFF; MINIDOKA ) COUNTY SHERIFF; BANNOCK ) COUNTY SHERIFF; LINCOLN COUNTY ) SHERIFF; TETON COUNTY SHERIFF; ) VALLEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BUTTE ) COUNTY SHERIFF; GOODING ) COUNTY SHERIFF; BOISE COUNTY ) SHERIFF; CAMAS COUNTY SHERIFF; ) ELMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; and ) LEMHI COUNTY SHERIFF, ) ) Defendants. ) * * * * * COME NOW The Plaintiffs, John and Jane Does 1-86, by and through the undersigned attorneys, Fuller Law Offices, and file this Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief. This is an action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 to address the unconstitutionality of Idaho s Sexual Offender Registration Notification and Community Right-to-Know Act (hereinafter referred to as Sex Offender Registry) as last amended by the Idaho State Legislature July 1, Plaintiffs challenge the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws to be in violation of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions and ask to permanently enjoin the Defendants from enforcing the said laws. NATURE OF THE ACTION As alleged with greater particularity below, Plaintiffs allege that specific provisions of the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws are unconstitutionally vague in violation of the due process protections of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions and amount to retroactive punishment, in violation of the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution and the retroactivity clause of the Idaho Constitution.
3 Plaintiffs also allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws further violate the Due Process, Substantive Due Process, Equal Protection, Double Jeopardy, Contracts, and Takings clauses of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions. Plaintiffs also allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws violate their rights to acquire, possess and protect property; their rights to seek and obtain safety and happiness; their rights to travel, life and liberty; and their rights to freedom of association and religion protected by the First Amendment and Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article 1, Sections 4 and 13 of the Idaho Constitution. Additionally, Plaintiffs allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 6 of the Idaho Constitution. Finally, Plaintiffs allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws violate the Separation of Powers doctrine of the Idaho Constitution. Plaintiffs are challenging the Sex Offender Registry and laws both facially and as applied to them. I. JURISDICTION 1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the federal Constitutional violations alleged in this Complaint pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 28 U.S.C. Sections 1221 and Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(a), this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims. This Court has jurisdiction to issue injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2201 and 42 U.S.C. Section Venue is proper in the District of Idaho pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section All parties work and reside in Idaho, and all actions pertinent to this complaint occurred
4 in the State of Idaho. II. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, John Doe 1, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On November 15, 1984, John Doe 1 was convicted in Elmore County, State of Idaho, of an Infamous Crime Against Nature, against a child the age of 11 years. He was granted a Withheld Judgment and was placed on supervised probation for a period of ten (10) years. In 1993, John Doe 1 was informed that he was required to register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 1 completed a sex offender treatment program with Dr. Isom in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. John Doe 1 was released from probation on January 9, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 1 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2005, at the latest and November, 1994, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 1, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Elmore County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-five years after the conviction date.
5 John Doe 1 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 4. Plaintiff, John Doe 2, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On January 3, 1990, John Doe 2 was convicted of two counts of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 12 years and 11 years, felonies. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a minimum fixed period of one (1) year followed by an indeterminate period of six (6) years for each of the counts. These sentences were to be served concurrently. However the Court retained jurisdiction for 120 days and John Doe 2 was placed in Cottonwood for the Sexual Offender Program. On July 20, 1990, John Doe 2 was placed on probation for a period of seven (7) years. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 2 was not required to register. John Doe 2 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 2 completed a sex offender treatment program with S.A.N.E. in 1996, and in January, 1997, John Doe 2 was released from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 2 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2007, at the latest and July, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was
6 below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 2, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of two counts of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty years after the date of conviction. John Doe 2 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 5. Plaintiff, John Doe 3, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On July 19, 1999, John Doe 3 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse with a Minor Under Sixteen, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a period not to exceed eight (8) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho. John Doe 3 was sentenced to serve a minimum of three (3) years in custody and a subsequent indeterminate period of five (5) years. This sentence was suspended by the Court and John Doe 3 was placed on probation for a period of three (3) years. John Doe 3 began registering when his probation began in July, At that time, Idaho Code Section , Release From Registration Requirements stated: Any person, other than one designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 3 completed a sex offender treatment program with McNiel and Associates, LLC, in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, in July, John Doe 3 was granted early release from probation on or
7 about July 7, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 3 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 3, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, ten years after the conviction date. John Doe 3 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 6. Plaintiff, John Doe 4, is a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho. On June 15, 1988, John Doe 4 was convicted in Cassia County, Sate of Idaho, of Lewd and Lascivious Conduct with a Minor, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for a determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed forty-two (42) months. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 180 days. John Doe 4 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years. John Doe 4 completed a sex offender treatment program at Life Cycle Counseling in March, 1995 and was released from probation on April 17, In July, 1998, John Doe 4 was informed that he must begin registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than one designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was
8 released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 4 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, 1998, the same year he was informed he must register. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 4, a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-one years after the date of conviction. John Doe 4 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 7. Plaintiff, John Doe 5, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On August 30, 1988, John Doe 5 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 7 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction, Boise, State of Idaho, for a minimum fixed period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed three (3) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 5 was placed on probation for a period of three (3) years. John Doe 5 violated this probation and, on August 20, 1991, the order for probation was revoked and the original sentence was reinstated, however, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days in the Sex
9 Offender s Program at Cottonwood. On February 13, 1992, it was ordered that John Doe 5 remain in the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections. John Doe 5 was under the custody of Idaho State Board of Corrections for a period of two (2) years. In 1994, John Doe 5 was placed on parole in April, 1994, for a period of two (2) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 5 was released from parole on September 12, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 5 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in September, 2006, at the latest and April, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 5, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-one years after the date of conviction. John Doe 5 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 8. Plaintiff, John Doe 6, is a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho. On November 15, 1991, John Doe 6 was convicted of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child
10 Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a minimum fixed and determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period up to forty-two (42) months. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 6 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years. In 1993, John Doe 6 was informed that he must register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. On October 16, 1996, John Doe 6 was released from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 6 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in October, 2006, at the latest and November, 2001, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 6, a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eighteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 6 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 9. Plaintiff, John Doe 7, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On December 11, 1992, John Doe 7 was convicted in Bannock County, State of Idaho, of two
11 counts of Sex Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16, to-wit the age of 10 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed term of three (3) years and a subsequent indeterminate term of four (4) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 7 was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. John Doe 7 completed a sex offender treatment program with Paul Ives and was released from probation on August 24, In 1999, John Doe 7 was advised that he must begin registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 7 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 7, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bannock County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seventeen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 7 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry.
12 10. Plaintiff, John Doe 8, is a resident of Jerome County, State of Idaho. On August 1, 1994, John Doe 8 was convicted in Twin Falls County of Rape, a felony, and convicted in Jerome County, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony. John Doe 8 was sentenced to serve a minimum of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed three (3) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days in Cottonwood, the sentence was suspended, and in February, 1995 John Doe 8 was placed on probation for a period of two (2) years. John Doe 8 began registering as a sex offender that year. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 8 completed a sex offender treatment program with Gail Ater and Paul Ives. John Doe 8 was released from probation on March 24, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 8 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in March, 2007, at the latest and February, 2005, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. In November, 2011, John Doe 8 attempted to be removed from the sex offender registry, but was denied. Plaintiff, John Doe 8, a resident of Jerome County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho and a sexual offense in Jerome
13 County, State of Idaho in John Doe 8 petitioned to be removed from the registry in 2011, but was denied. His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fifteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 8 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 11. Plaintiff, John Doe 9, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On April 14, 1992, John Doe 9 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under Sixteen, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction for an aggregate term of five (5) years which consisted of a minimum period of confinement of one (1) year followed by a subsequent indeterminate period of custody not to exceed four (4) years. However, the court retained jurisdiction for 180 days to suspend execution of Judgment. On April 14, 1992, John Doe 9 was placed on probation for a five (5) year period. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 9 was not required to register. John Doe 9 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. In 1996, John Doe 9 completed the sex offender treatment program with the S.A.N.E. Program and he was released from probation on April 6, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 9 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, 2009, at the latest and April, 2002, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated
14 offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 9, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seventeen years after the conviction date. John Doe 9 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 12. Plaintiff, John Doe 10, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On April 24, 1992, John Doe 10 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho, of Rape, to-wit the age of 16 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed eight (8) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days. On April 21, 1992, John Doe 10 was placed on probation for a period of two (2) years. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 10 was not required to register. John Doe 10 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 10 completed a sex offender treatment program with Paul Ives and was released from probation on May 5, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 10 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in May, 2004, the latest and April, 2002, at
15 the earliest. In this same year, John Doe 10 petitioned the Court for removal from the registry, but was denied because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where a person who committed an aggravated offense was ineligible to petition. The definition of an aggravated offense, at this time, included rape, but excluding section (1) where the victim is at least twelve (12) years of age or the defendant is eighteen (18) years of age or younger. Because of this amendment, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 10, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in He petitioned to be released from the sex offender registry in 2004 and was denied. His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, nine years after the date of conviction. John Doe 10 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 13. Plaintiff, John Doe 11, is a resident of Bingham County, State of Idaho. On July 9, 1993, John Doe 11 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 3 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period of up to forty-two (42) months at the Idaho State Board of Corrections. This sentence was suspended and John Doe 11 was placed on probation for a period of sixty (60) months. At this time, John Doe 11 was advised that he must register as a sex offender and the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date
16 of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 11 violated his probation in 1996, and was reinstated on his original sixty (60) month probation with additional conditions. John Doe 11 was released from probation on July 19, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 11 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, 2008, at the latest and July, 2003, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 11, a resident of Bingham County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, eight years after the conviction date. John Doe 11 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 14. Plaintiff, John Doe 12, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On February 14, 1995, John Doe 12 was convicted in Nez Perce County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit of the age of 12 years of age, a felony. He was sentenced to a period of fifteen (15) years consisting of a minimum of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period of ten (10) years at the Idaho State Board of Correction, Boise, State of Idaho. John Doe 12 was released from the Idaho State Board of Correction and placed on parole in September, John Doe 12 began registering on or about September 18, 2003 and at this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who
17 has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 12 completed sex offender treatment in January, 2010, and was discharged from probation in February, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 12 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in September, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 12, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Nez Perce County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fourteen years after the conviction date. John Doe 12 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 15. Plaintiff, John Doe 13, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. In February, 1990, John Doe 13 was convicted in Canyon County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 10 years, a felony. He was sentenced to seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. John Doe 13 was to serve a minimum of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period of four (4) years. However this sentence was suspended and John
18 Doe 13 was placed on probation for a period of seven (7) years. John Doe 13 was advised that he must register as a sex offender in At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. In January, 1996, John Doe 13 was placed on unsupervised probation and in April of the same year, was discharged from probation. During probation, John Doe 13 completed a sex offender treatment program with Dr. Stoner in Ada County, State of Idaho. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 13 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2006, at the latest and February, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 13, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Canyon County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, eleven years after the conviction date. John Doe 13 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 16. Plaintiff, John Doe 14, is a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho. On December 27, 1993, John Doe 14 was convicted in Franklin County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 9 years, a
19 felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho for a determinate period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed ten (10) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days. John Doe 14 was placed on probation on July 11, 1994 for a period of five (5) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 14 completed a sex offender treatment program with ISAT. John Doe 14 was released from probation in December, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 14 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, 2009, at the latest and July, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 14, a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Franklin County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fifteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 14 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 17. Plaintiff, John Doe 15, is a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho. On June 28, 1996, John Doe 15 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd
20 Conduct with a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 13 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a minimum fixed and determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period of up to forty-two (42) months. This sentence was suspended after John Doe 15 successfully completed the Rider program and was placed on probation for a period of forty-eight (48) months. During John Doe 15 s time in Cottonwood, he competed a sex offender treatment program. John Doe 15 began registering in 1996 and, at this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 15 was released from probation in June, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 15 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in June, 2010, at the latest and June, 2006, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of an aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 15, a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, thirteen years after the conviction date. John Doe 15 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 18. Plaintiff, John Doe 16, is a resident of Bannock County, State of Idaho. On
21 January 25, 2002, John Doe 16 was convicted in Bannock County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the Idaho Department of Corrections, State of Idaho for a fixed term of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate term not to exceed seven (7) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 16 served one (1) year in the Bannock County Jail with work release. On November 18, 2002, John Doe 16 was granted early release from the Bannock County Jail and was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. The following day, November 19, 2002, John Doe 16 was required to register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 16 completed a sex offender treatment program with Kenneth Lindsey at Southeast Idaho Center for Neurobehavioral and Developmental Disorders on November 11, On December 1, 2009, John Doe 16 was discharged from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 16 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in November Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being
22 removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 16, a resident of Bannock County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bannock County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 16 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 19. Plaintiff, John Doe 17, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On April 22, 2002, John Doe 17 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of Sixteen Years, to-wit the age of 7 or 8 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a unified sentence of fifteen (15) years. This was comprised of a minimum period of confinement of two (2) years, followed by an indeterminate period of custody of thirteen (13) years. This sentence was suspended for the first 180 days, and the Court retained jurisdiction. John Doe 17 completed the Rider program and was placed on probation on or about October 28, 2002 for a period of ten (10) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 17 completed a sex offender treatment program with McNeil and Associates while on probation and did not violate his
23 probation. John Doe 17 was discharged from probation on or about November 8, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 17 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in October, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 17, a resident of Twin Falls County, Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the conviction date. John Doe 17 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 20. Plaintiff, John Doe 18, is a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho. On November 13, 1989, John Doe 18 was convicted in Lincoln County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of three (3) years, followed by an indeterminate period of time not to exceed seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. This sentence was suspended and the Court retained jurisdiction. During this 180 day Rider program, John Doe 18 took part in the sex offender treatment program. In August, 1990, John Doe 18 was placed on supervised probation for a period of five (5) years. In 1993, John Doe 18 was advised that he was required to register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on
24 probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 18 was discharged from probation August 28, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 18 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in August, 2005, at the latest and August, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included Idaho Code: (lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age), he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 18, a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Lincoln County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, twelve years after the conviction date. John Doe 18 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 21. Plaintiff, John Doe 19, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On September 3, 2002, John Doe 19 was convicted in the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho for a determinate period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period of ten (10) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days and John Doe 19 was placed on probation for a period of fifteen (15) years beginning March 3, At this time, John Doe 19 began registering as a sex offender and the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a
25 recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 19 completed sex offender treatment programs and he was granted early release from probation on April 30, Based on the abovecited facts, John Doe 19 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in March, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 19, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 19 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 22. Plaintiff, John Doe 20, is a resident of Teton County, State of Idaho. On March 28, 2001, John Doe 20 was convicted in Teton County, State of Idaho of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 12 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Sate of Idaho for a determinate period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed
26 nine (9) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 120 days and John Doe 20 was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. At this time John Doe 20 was required to register and, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 20 completed a sex offender treatment plan with New Beginnings in May, 2004 and was granted early release from probation in November Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 20 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. In July, 2012, John Doe 20 filed a Petition for Release from Registration Requirements and Expungement and other required documents, however, he was soon advised that the State would appeal his release. John Doe 20 then abandoned this attempt. Plaintiff, John Doe 20, a resident of Teton County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Teton County, State of Idaho in John Doe 20 s offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eight years after the conviction date. John Doe 20 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex
27 Offender Registry. 23. Plaintiff, John Doe 21, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On May 29, 2001, John Doe 21 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed minimum period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period of seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 21 was placed on supervised probation for a period of four (4) years beginning on July 9, John Doe 21 began registering as a sex offender in July 2001 and at this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation John Doe 21 completed a sex offender treatment program with Gail Ater and was released from probation on July 11, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 21 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 21, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was
28 convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eight years after the date of conviction. John Doe 21 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 24. Plaintiff, John Doe 22, is a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho. On December 18, 1991, John Doe 22 was convicted in Bonneville County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 5 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years. This consisted of a fixed determinate period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed eight (8) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 120 days and at the Review Hearing on or about February 13, 1992, John Doe 22 was placed in the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for his original sentence. John Doe 22 served two (2) years and was released on parole in 1994 and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on parole, John Doe 22 completed a sex offender treatment program and on November 20, 2001, John Doe 22 was released from parole. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 22 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in November, 2011, at the latest and February, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, an offender who committed an aggravated offense was excluded from
29 petitioning rights. At this time, the definition of aggravated offense included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age. Because of these amendments, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 22, a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bonneville County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, ten years after the date of conviction. John Doe 22 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 25. Plaintiff, John Doe 23, is a resident of Valley County, State of Idaho. On April 23, 1999, John Doe 23 was convicted in Canyon County, State of Idaho, of Sex Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 9 or 10 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction for a determinate period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed five (5) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 23 was placed on probation for a period of four (4) years. John Doe 23 violated his probation and in 2003, was sentenced to the custody of Cottonwood for a period of 180 days. On December 11, 2003, John Doe 23 was placed on probation for a period of eight (8) years and was required to register as a sex offender. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirement stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the
30 district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 23 completed a sex offender treatment program with Kim Lincoln. John Doe 23 was placed on unsupervised probation on April 24, 2009 for the remainder of his sentence and was released in Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 23 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 23, a resident of Valley County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Canyon County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, nine years after the date of conviction. John Doe 23 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 26. Plaintiff, John Doe 24, is a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho. On December 17, 2002, John Doe 24 was convicted in Lincoln County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for a determinate period of ten (10) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed five (5) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days. On June 17, 2003, John Doe 24 was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years and began registering
31 as a sex offender. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 24 completed a sex offender treatment program and John Doe 24 was granted early release from probation on January 16, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 24 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in June Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 24, a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Lincoln County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 24 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 27. Plaintiff, John Doe 25, is a resident of Butte County, State of Idaho. On April 9, 1990, John Doe 25 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 12 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of
32 Idaho, for a minimum of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed seven (7) years. John Doe 25 was incarcerated for the minimum period and was released in John Doe 25 began registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho the same year. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on parole, John Doe 25 completed a sex offender treatment program with Dr. Gary Horton and was released from parole in May, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 25 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in May, 2010, at the latest and April, 2003, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 25, a resident of Butte County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, nineteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 25 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 28. Plaintiff, John Doe 26, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On January 1, 1988, John Doe 26 was convicted in Bonneville County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 4 years, a felony.
33 The Court ordered that John Doe 26 s Judgment of Conviction be withheld pending successful completion of probation for a period of fifteen (15) years. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 26 was not required to register. John Doe 26 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. During probation, John Doe 26 completed a sex offender treatment program with Swede Siverson and Genesis in Ada County, State of Idaho. John Doe 26 was granted early release from probation in Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 26 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in 2010 at the latest and January, 1998, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 26, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bonneville County in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-one years after the conviction date. John Doe 26 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 29. Plaintiff, John Doe 27, is a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho. On
34 April 15, 1992, John Doe 27 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Minor, to-wit the age of 6 or 7 years. The Court withheld the Judgment and ordered probation for a period of ten (10) years. In July 1993, John Doe 27 was informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 27 completed a sex offender treatment program. On March 2, 1999, John Doe 27 was released from supervised probation and remained on bench probation until the period of probation expired on April 14, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 27 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, 2012, at the latest and April, 2002, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2011, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 27, a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seventeen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 27 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 30. Plaintiff, John Doe 28, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On April
35 22, 1991, John Doe 28 was convicted in Gem County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 12 or 13 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a minimum fixed period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed (10) years. John Doe 28 was released from incarceration in January, 2004 and was placed on parole. At this time, John Doe 28 began registering as a sex offender and the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on parole, John Doe 28 completed a sex offender treatment program with S.A.N.E. Solutions and successfully passed three polygraph tests. John Doe 28 was discharged from parole on March 11, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 28 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 28, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Gem County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eighteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 28 is
36 now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 31. Plaintiff, John Doe 29, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On March 21, 1994, John Doe 29 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of age, to-wit the age of 7 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a determinate period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed six (6) years. John Doe 29 completed all nine (9) years in the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections and was released on March 20, Later that year, John Doe 29 began registering as a sex offender and, at that time, the Release from Registration Requirements state: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 29 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in March, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 29, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was
37 convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fifteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 29 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 32. Plaintiff, John Doe 30, is a resident of Gooding County, State of Idaho. On May 26, 1990, John Doe 30 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 9 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction, State of Idaho for a determinate period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period of five (5) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days and John Doe 30 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years beginning June 4, At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 30 was not required to register. John Doe 30 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 30 completed a sex offender treatment program with Judy McCallester and Paul Ives. John Doe 30 was released from probation on May 10, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 30 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in May, 2006, at the latest and June, 2000, at the earilest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of aggravated offense now included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of
38 age, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 30, a resident of Gooding County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, eleven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 30 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry.
39 33. Plaintiff, John Doe 31, is a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho. On November 14, 1997, John Doe 31 was convicted of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 7 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed three (3) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days and John Doe 31 was placed on probation for a period of four (4) years. John Doe 31 began registering as a sex offender in April, 1998, and at this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 31 was released from probation on December Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 31 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, 2012, at the latest and May, 2008, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 31, a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Franklin County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twelve years after the date of conviction. John Doe 31 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry.
40 34. Plaintiff, John Doe 32, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On June 8, 2005, John Doe 32 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 6 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the Idaho State Correction Institution for a period of ten (10) years, however, this sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. Once placed on probation, he was required to register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 32 completed a sex offender treatment program at S.A.N.E. Solutions. John Doe 32 was released from probation in Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 32 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in June, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 32, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, four years after the date of conviction. John Doe 32 is now
41 required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 35. Plaintiff, John Doe 33, is a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho. On November 3, 2003, John Doe 33 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 12 years, a felony. John Doe 33 was sentenced to the Idaho State Penitentiary for a determinate period of 24 months and an indeterminate period not to exceed 60 months. However, this judgment was suspended and John Doe 33 was placed in the Rider program for a period of 180 days. In June, 2004, John Doe 33 was released and placed on supervised probation for a period of 60 months and John Doe 33 began registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 33 would have had standing to petition to be released in June Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 33, a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not
42 considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, six years after the date of conviction. John Doe 33 is now required to register for life on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 36. Plaintiff, John Doe 34, is a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho. On May 8, 2003, John Doe 34 was convicted in Franklin County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 5 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed and determinate term of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate term not to exceed five (5) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. John Doe 34 was released from the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, placed on probation, and began registering as a sex offender in April, At this time the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 34 completed a sex offender treatment program and he was released from probation on April 23, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 34 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry.
43 Plaintiff, John Doe 34, a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Franklin County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, six years after the date of conviction. John Doe 34 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 37. Plaintiff Jane Doe 35, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On January 16, 1996, Jane Doe 35 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho, of Lewd and Lascivious Conduct with a Minor Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. She was sentenced to the custody of State Board of Correction for a determinate period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed twelve (12) years. However, this sentence was suspended and Jane Doe 35 was placed on probation for a period of fifteen (15) years. Jane Doe 35 began registering as a sex offender in July, At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, Jane Doe 35 completed a sex offender treatment program with Keith Potter. On May 15, 2006, Jane Doe 35 was granted unsupervised probation for the remainder of the sentence and was released from probation in January, Based on the above-cited facts, Jane Doe 35 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2021, at the latest and January, 2006, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is
44 less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, she was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff Jane Doe 35, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in Her offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, thirteen years after the date of conviction. Jane Doe 35 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 38. Plaintiff Jane Doe 36, is a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho. On August 26, 2004, Jane Doe 36 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under the Age of 16, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. She was sentenced to the Idaho State Board of Correction, Boise, Idaho, for a fixed determinate period of twenty-four (24) months followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed seventy-two (72) months. In August, 2006, Jane Doe 36 was released from the Idaho State Board of Corrections and placed on parole. Jane Doe 36 was required to register as a sex offender the same year. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. During parole, Jane Doe 36 completed a sex offender treatment program with Behavior Reform Inc. and she was released from parole on August 16, Based on the above-cited facts, Jane Doe 36 would have had
45 standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, she was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff Jane Doe 36, a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in Her offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, five years after the date of conviction. Jane Doe36 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 39. Plaintiff, John Doe 37, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On April 27, 2007, John Doe 37 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of two counts of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit of the age of 15 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a unified sentence of twelve (12) years to the Idaho State board of Correction, Boise, Idaho. This sentence consisted of a fixed period of four (4) years followed by an indeterminate period of eight (8) years. However, the Court suspended the Judgment and retained jurisdiction for 180 days. On September 26, 2007, John Doe 37 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years after successfully completing the Rider program. John Doe 37 was then required to register as a sex offender at this time, and, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole,
46 supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. On December 2, 2010, John Doe 37 was granted early release from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 37 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements September, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of an aggravated offense changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 37, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, two years after the conviction date. John Doe 37 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 40. Plaintiff, John Doe 38, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On May 1, 2006, John Doe 38 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of two counts of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 12 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Penitentiary for a determinate period of 5 years followed by an indeterminate period of 10 years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 180 days. In September, 2006, John Doe 38 was placed on supervised probation for a period of 5 years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or
47 an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 38 was released from probation in December, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 38 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in September Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009 where the definition of an aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 38, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of two counts of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, three years after the date of conviction. John Doe 38 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 41. Plaintiff, John Doe 39, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On February 4, 2013, John Doe 39 was convicted of two counts of Sexual Exploitation of a Child, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the State Board of Correction for a period of ten years, consisting of a fixed term of three years followed by an indeterminate term of seven years. However, the court retained jurisdiction for a period of 365 days. John Doe 39 was placed on probation in July, 2013 for a period of 20 years. At this time he began registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. This particular crime, sexual
48 exploitation of a child, was listed as a register-able offense since 1998, but has never been listed as an aggravated offense unless the child is less than thirteen years of age according to the most recent laws. There is no evidence whatsoever in the record that is available to the sex offender registry to determine that any victim was under the age of thirteen. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 40 would have standing to petition to be released from the registration requirements in July, 2023, ten years after beginning registration (although his probation cannot be over the maximum penalty). To date, John Doe 39 has standing to petition according to the release from registration requirements that were in effect from July 1, 2011 that state: registration under this act is for life; however, any offender, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the offender was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the offender shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. If the offender was convicted in Idaho, the offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she was convicted. If the offender was convicted in a jurisdiction other than Idaho, then the offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she resides. John Doe 39 is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator. Plaintiff, John Doe 39, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of two counts of a sexual offense in He is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator, therefore, John Doe
49 39 is eligible to petition the Court to be removed from the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 42. Plaintiff, John Doe 40, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On February 6, 2006, John Doe 40 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Contact with a Prisoner, to-wit the age of 27 years, a felony. John Doe 40 served 90 days at the Ada County Jail with work release and began registering as a sex offender in March, At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 40 would have standing to petition to be released from the registration requirements in March, To date, John Doe 40 has standing to petition according to the release from registration requirements that were in effect from July 1, 2011 that state: registration under this act is for life; however, any offender, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the offender was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the offender shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. If the offender was convicted in Idaho, the offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she was convicted. If the offender was convicted in a jurisdiction other than Idaho, then the
50 offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she resides. John Doe 40 is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator. Plaintiff, John Doe 40, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in He is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator, therefore, John Doe 40 is eligible to petition the Court to be removed from the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 43. Plaintiff, John Doe 41, is a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho. On December 13, 1996, John Doe 41 was convicted in Franklin County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Minor Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony, and was sentenced to a fixed and determinate term of seven (7) years followed by an indeterminate term not to exceed five (5) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. Before being incarcerated, John Doe 41 was informed that he will be required to register as a sex offender. John Doe 41 attended sex offender treatment programs while at the Idaho State Board of Corrections and was released on December 12, 2008 and was not placed on parole. After being released, John Doe 41 began registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall
51 be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 41 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, To date, John Doe 41 has standing to petition according to the Release from Registration Requirements that were in effect from July 1, 2011 that state: registration under this act is for life; however, any offender, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the offender was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the offender shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. If the offender was convicted in Idaho, the offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she was convicted. If the offender was convicted in a jurisdiction other than Idaho, then the offender shall file his or her petition in the county in which he or she resides. John Doe 41 is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator. Plaintiff, John Doe 41, a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Franklin County, State of Idaho in His is not a recidivist, did not commit an aggravated offense, and is not classified as a violent sexual predator, therefore, John Doe 41 is eligible to petition to the Court to be removed from the Idaho Sex Offender Registry.
COMPLAINT. 1. This action arises under Article I, 2, 7, 10 and 12 of the Rhode Island
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT ) DENNIS GESMONDI, DALLAS HUARD) and GEORGE MADANCY, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) C.A. No. ) STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ) RHODE ISLAND ATTORNEY ) GENERAL, and PROVIDENCE
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 2015 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 0 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 0 BY JUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE 0 0 0 0 AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE;
HON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND SAMUEL POE, individually and on behalf of all other persons
PETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION
PETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Jamie Markham Assistant Professor, School of Government 919.843.3914 [email protected] October 2013 A. Length of Registration There are two categories
64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE
64th Legislature HB0088 AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE OFFENDER TO PROVIDE E-MAIL ADDRESSES AND SOCIAL MEDIA SCREEN NAMES WHEN REGISTERING; REQUIRING
JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS
JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Sex Offender Laws... 1 Jacob Wetterling Act of 1994... 2 Megan s Law (1996)... 2 Pam Lychner Act of 1996... 2 Adam Walsh Act of 2006...
AN ACT RELATING TO SEX OFFENDERS; REQUIRING ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION; REQUIRING SEX OFFENDERS TO REGISTER AND UPDATE
AN ACT RELATING TO SEX OFFENDERS; REQUIRING ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION; REQUIRING SEX OFFENDERS TO REGISTER AND UPDATE INFORMATION WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS; PROVIDING FOR VERIFICATION OF REGISTRATION;
JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION
JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Requirements, Penalties & Relief Oregon law requires a juvenile found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court of certain sex offenses to register as a sex
SEALING OF RECORDS. Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE. DAVID ROGER District Attorney
SEALING OF RECORDS Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE DAVID ROGER District Attorney NOTICE: This Website contains instructions for using the Clark County District
Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015 M-1 Tort Claims Act M-2 Death Penalty in Kansas M-3 Kansas Administrative Procedure Act M-4 Sex
Collection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:-
Budget Amendment ID: FY2014-S3-90 Collection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:- JUD 90 SECTION. (a)
Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals.. 3. 4 Appointment of Counsel... 4
Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court Table of Contents Rule Page 1 Applicability. 1 2 Grand Jury 2 3 Dismissals.. 3 4 Appointment of Counsel...... 4 5 Case Filing and Court Designation. 6 6 Arraignment...
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40618 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 40618 LARRY DEAN CORWIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 386 Filed: February 20, 2014 Stephen
Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes
Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes Sex Offender Registration Act, Sex Offender Commitment Act, Lifetime Supervision for Sex Offenders SORA 29 Chapter 40 1 Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA):
Victims of Crime Act
Victims of Crime Act PURPOSE Recognizing the state's concern for victims of crime, it is the purpose of the Victims of Crime Act [31-26-1 NMSA 1978] to assure that: A. the full impact of a crime is brought
Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses
Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)
Sex and Violent Crime Offender Registration
Sex and Violent Crime Offender Registration... 1 I. Registration of Sex Offenders... 1 A. Applicable Sex Offenses... 1 B. Designation Criteria for Sex Offender Level Assignment... 4 C. Duration of Registration...
AB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.
AB 109 is DANGEROUS Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011. Governor Brown stated in his signing message on AB 109 - "For too long, the state s prison
NO. COA12-1221 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 March 2013
NO. COA12-1221 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 March 2013 PAUL E. WALTERS, Plaintiff v. Nash County No. 12 CVS 622 ROY A. COOPER, III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Parole Board 220 IAC 1.1-1-1 Parole board membership (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Parole Board; filed Jun 15, 1987, 2:45 pm: 10 IR 2496) 220 IAC 1.1-1-2 Definitions
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box 22024 Santa Ana, CA 92702-2024 (877) 872-2122 www.occourts.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON Forms and Penal Code 4852.01, and 4852.06 Instruction Sheet Notice of Filing of Proof of Service Certificate of Rehabilitation
The rights of crime victims in Maryland. The role and responsibilities of Law Enforcement
The rights of crime victims in Maryland The role and responsibilities of Law Enforcement Prepared by the Governor s Office of Crime Control & Prevention and the Maryland State Board of Victim Services
Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum
Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office PO BOX 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706 (406) 444-3064 FAX (406) 444-3036 Memorandum To: Law and Justice Interim Committee From: Julianne Burkhardt
INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26
INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26 Petition Form Carefully read the attached form to fill out your Petition for Expungement of Criminal Records
RHODE ISLAND SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION
RHODE ISLAND SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION CONTACT INFORMATION Rhode Island State Police Bureau of Criminal Investigation 150 South Main Street Providence, RI 02903-2907 Telephone: 401-421-5268
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
SORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Delaware
SORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Delaware The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking
Idaho Manual on the Rights of Victims of Crime
Office of the Attorney General Idaho Manual on the Rights of Victims of Crime JULY 2004 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General 700 West State Street Boise, ID 83720-0010 www.ag.idaho.gov State of Idaho Office
Sexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Civil Commitment
Sexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Civil Commitment The Massachusetts SDP statute, G.L. c. 123A, allows for an individual to be civilly committed (incarcerated) for a day to life if that person has been found
Family Policy Compliance Office Guidelines: Disclosure of Education Records Concerning Registered Sex Offenders
Family Policy Compliance Office Guidelines: Disclosure of Education Records Concerning Registered Sex Offenders This guidance concerns an amendment to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RICHARD MILLER, of the ) Town of Searsport, County of ) Waldo, State of Maine, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) DALE MCCORMICK in her official capacity ) as Director and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 104,581. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, RAYMOND L. ROSS, III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 104,581 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RAYMOND L. ROSS, III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A sentence of 162 months' imprisonment with lifetime postrelease
Issue Brief. Arizona State Senate ARIZONA SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION INTRODUCTION ADAM WALSH ACT. November 23, 2009.
Arizona State Senate Issue Brief November 23, 2009 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members
Filing Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record
Filing Fee $117.00 Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Effective 1-1-2015 This packet is to be used to assist you in filing an application to seal your criminal record. * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE TO GRANDPARENT
A Power of Atrney may be created if the parent, guardian, or cusdian of the child is any of the following: 1. Seriously ill, incarcerated, or about be incarcerated 2. Temporarily unable provide financial
CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA File No. Julius Chad Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. Dave Bellows, in his individual and official
Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP
Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. -0.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL - Kagan, Lee HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Guzman, Ulibarri SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY
COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY This document is meant to provide general information about the collateral consequences of juvenile adjudications. This document is not
(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
BEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE STATE OF IDAHO. This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing on November 3,
Hearing Officer 714 North 5th street P.O. Box 1678 Boise, Idaho 83701 Telephone: (208) 342-8931 Facsimile: (208) 384-5686 Idaho state Bar No. 1763 FILED ~ NOV 1 2 2010 Department of Insurance State of
MISSISSIPPI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 32, 57.3 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1673 Complaints (2007) Updated December 21, 2008
MISSISSIPPI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 32, 57.3 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1673 Complaints (2007) Updated December 21, 2008 Current Laws: A person shall not obtain or attempt to obtain
CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET
CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET PKG-016 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION, 220 W. BROADWAY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3814 EAST COUNTY DIVISION, 250 E.
Livescan cards, when received, apply electronically to the DCI & FBI records
Juveniles should be fingerprinted upon being taken into custody for any serious or aggravated misdemeanor or felony charge and the Final Disposition Report started Livescan electronically submits cards
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140 CHAPTER 1950. ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE OR INTIMIDATION ACT Rule 1951.
A Guide to Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in Illinois
State of Illinois Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor Illinois State Police Larry G. Trent, Director A Guide to Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in Illinois January 1, 2006 Illinois State Police
An act relative to updating Massachusetts sex offender laws
An act relative to updating Massachusetts sex offender laws SECTION 1. Chapter 6 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking out sections 178C to 178Q, inclusive, as appearing in the 2010 Official
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Michael Dohr x HOUSE BILL 1-1 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Lebsock and Tate, (None), SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES (a) Mission: The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce
ANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER
ANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER You are strongly encouraged to obtain help from an attorney in order to protect your rights and to correctly follow all the applicable substantive
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
2010 REVISIONS TO GEORGIA SEX OFFENDER LAW: A SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 571 FOR MEMBERS OF THE WHITAKER V. PERDUE CLASS
2010 REVISIONS TO GEORGIA SEX OFFENDER LAW: A SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 571 FOR MEMBERS OF THE WHITAKER V. PERDUE CLASS House Bill 571 made significant changes to Georgia law governing persons on
How to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor
How to Apply for a Pardon State of California Office of the Governor Statement of Philosophy A California Governor's pardon is an honor traditionally granted only to individuals who have demonstrated exemplary
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Filed 7/7/16 P. v. Salazar CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment
Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment AB 109 (Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011) as subsequently amended by AB 117 (Chapter 39, Statutes of 2011) and ABX1 17 (Chapter 12, Statutes
Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 364.02 Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION 364.01 POLICY. 364.02 DEFINITIONS. 364.021 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT; CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE André de Gruy Capital Defender Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force Created - HB 1231 2013 Leg. Judge and Prosecutor concerns about lack of certainty in sentencing/time-served
State Enactments Imposing Restrictions on Sex Offenders, especially as related to contact with children. February 2006
State Enactments Imposing Restrictions on Sex Offenders, especially as related to contact with children February 2006 The following are laws that broadly impose restrictions and penalties on sex offenders.
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON
DUI. The funds received under the provisions of this subsection shall be distributed as follows:
DUI 63-1-46. [Effective 10/1/2014] [Fees for reinstatement of license subsequent to suspension, revocation or cancellation generally; disposition of fees; procedure and fees for reinstatement of license
Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security
Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to offenses; providing that counseling and evaluations required for certain offenses may be conducted in
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs [email protected] (916) 445-4950 WHAT IS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
Virginia State Crime Commission s Sex Offender Task Force
Virginia State Crime Commission s Sex Offender Task Force Formation of Virginia s Sex Offender Task Force Heinous crimes against children committed by sex offenders in other states have been well publicized
STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 789 By: Wilkerson COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE [ corrections - judicial review - modifying when report is provided
Case No. CV-12-5564. Plaintiff, the State ofidaho, Department of Finance ("Department"), and Defendant, Bart
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN Attorney General ALAN CONILOGUE Deputy Attorney General State ofidaho P. 0. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0031 Telephone: 208.332.8093 Fax: 208.332.8016 ISBN 3196 [email protected]
Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013
Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013 Panel Introductions Judge Keith Starrett Moderator Judge Robert Francis Panelist Judge Stephen Manley Panelist Charles Robinson - Panelist Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court
INFORMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES CHARLES I. WADAMS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
INFORMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES CHARLES I. WADAMS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Garden City, Idaho 6015 Glenwood St., Garden City, ID 83714 (208) 472-2900 www.gardencityidaho.org A MESSAGE Garden City
2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
SB138 Engrossed LRB9203748RCcd 1 AN ACT concerning drug treatment. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT? PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Revises the definition of a felony
AN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
Employer Instructions for Use ODH Form 805 Uniform Employment Application for Nurse Aide Staff
Effective November 1, 2012 Employer Instructions for Use ODH Form 805 Uniform Employment Application for Nurse Aide Staff Purpose This form is to be used by employers as the only employment application
CHAPTER 89. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 89 AN ACT concerning juvenile justice, amending and supplementing various parts of the statutory law, and repealing section 7 of P.L.1982, c.77. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
Councilmembers Jim Graham and Tommy Wells introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on.
1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Councilmember Tommy Wells Councilmember Jim Graham A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Councilmembers Jim Graham and Tommy Wells introduced the following bill, which was referred
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.
August 2, 2013. Mark Keel, Chief State Law Enforcement Division Post Office Box 21398 Columbia, South Carolina 29221.
ALAN WILSON ATIORNEY GENERAL Mark Keel, Chief State Law Enforcement Division Post Office Box 21398 Columbia, South Carolina 29221 Dear Chief Keel, You seek an opinion of this Office as to whether an individual
Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Definitions of serious sex offence
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit The Victim/Witness Assistance Division of the Lake County State s Attorney s Office was formed to serve the needs of people like you. The division is meant to ensure
Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
2014 Chelsea s Law Impact Report A 12-Month Review of San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and Sacramento Counties
Report Objective 2014 Chelsea s Law Impact Report A 12-Month Review of San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and Sacramento Counties Each year, Chelsea s Light Foundation prepares an annual Chelsea
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1354 **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1354 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AARON ORLANDO RICHARDS ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. CR133795
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:12-cv-00547-CWD Document 38 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ALBERT MOORE, v. Petitioner, Case No. 1:12-cv-00547-CWD MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 2605. September Term, 2002 HENRY L. PITTS STATE OF MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2605 September Term, 2002 HENRY L. PITTS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J., Getty, James S., (Retired, specially assigned), Moylan, Charles E.,
Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Patricia A. DeAngelis District Attorney GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN OFFENSE IS COMMITTED There are three types of offenses that can be committed in New York State: VIOLATION MISDEMEANOR
Arizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights. Arizona Revised Statutes:
Arizona Laws Arizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights Arizona Revised Statutes: Title 13, Chapter 40 Crime Victims Rights Title 8, Chapter 3, Article 7 Victims Rights for Juvenile
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : SAM STINSON, on his behalf : and on behalf of all persons : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs : Civil Action File v.
