IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO * * * * *
|
|
- Avis May
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Greg J. Fuller Daniel S. Brown FULLER LAW OFFICES Attorneys at Law 161 Main Avenue West P. O. Box L Twin Falls, ID Telephone: (208) Facsimile : (208) ISB #1442 ISB #7538 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO * * * * * JOHN and JANE DOES 1-86, ) Case No. ) Plaintiffs, ) ) COMPLAINT FOR vs. ) INJUNCTIVE AND ) DECLARATORY RELIEF LAWRENCE WASDEN, Attorney General ) of the State of Idaho; KEVIN KEMPF, ) Director of the Idaho Department of ) Correction; HENRY ATENCIO, Chief ) Department of Correction Probation and ) Parole Division, SEXUAL OFFENDER ) MANAGEMENT BOARD and its ) members, SHANE EVANS, MICHAEL ) JOHNSTON, Ph.d., DOLLY BEDAL, ) JEFFREY BETTS, JON BURNHAM, ) JEAN FISHER, PAULA GARAY, ) SHERIFF CHARLES HUFF, KIMBERLY ) SIMMONS and CHRISTINA IVERSON, ) in their official capacities, COLONEL ) RALPH POWELL, Director, IDAHO ) STATE POLICE, TWIN FALLS COUNTY ) SHERIFF; ADA COUNTY SHERIFF; ) BONNEVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF; ) CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFF; JEROME )
2 COUNTY SHERIFF; BINGHAM ) COUNTY SHERIFF; FRANKLIN ) COUNTY SHERIFF; MINIDOKA ) COUNTY SHERIFF; BANNOCK ) COUNTY SHERIFF; LINCOLN COUNTY ) SHERIFF; TETON COUNTY SHERIFF; ) VALLEY COUNTY SHERIFF; BUTTE ) COUNTY SHERIFF; GOODING ) COUNTY SHERIFF; BOISE COUNTY ) SHERIFF; CAMAS COUNTY SHERIFF; ) ELMORE COUNTY SHERIFF; and ) LEMHI COUNTY SHERIFF, ) ) Defendants. ) * * * * * COME NOW The Plaintiffs, John and Jane Does 1-86, by and through the undersigned attorneys, Fuller Law Offices, and file this Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief. This is an action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 to address the unconstitutionality of Idaho s Sexual Offender Registration Notification and Community Right-to-Know Act (hereinafter referred to as Sex Offender Registry) as last amended by the Idaho State Legislature July 1, Plaintiffs challenge the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws to be in violation of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions and ask to permanently enjoin the Defendants from enforcing the said laws. NATURE OF THE ACTION As alleged with greater particularity below, Plaintiffs allege that specific provisions of the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws are unconstitutionally vague in violation of the due process protections of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions and amount to retroactive punishment, in violation of the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution and the retroactivity clause of the Idaho Constitution.
3 Plaintiffs also allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws further violate the Due Process, Substantive Due Process, Equal Protection, Double Jeopardy, Contracts, and Takings clauses of the U.S. and Idaho Constitutions. Plaintiffs also allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws violate their rights to acquire, possess and protect property; their rights to seek and obtain safety and happiness; their rights to travel, life and liberty; and their rights to freedom of association and religion protected by the First Amendment and Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, as well as Article 1, Sections 4 and 13 of the Idaho Constitution. Additionally, Plaintiffs allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 6 of the Idaho Constitution. Finally, Plaintiffs allege that the Sex Offender Registry and accompanying statutes/laws violate the Separation of Powers doctrine of the Idaho Constitution. Plaintiffs are challenging the Sex Offender Registry and laws both facially and as applied to them. I. JURISDICTION 1. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over the federal Constitutional violations alleged in this Complaint pursuant to the provisions of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 28 U.S.C. Sections 1221 and Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(a), this Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs state law claims. This Court has jurisdiction to issue injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2201 and 42 U.S.C. Section Venue is proper in the District of Idaho pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section All parties work and reside in Idaho, and all actions pertinent to this complaint occurred
4 in the State of Idaho. II. PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, John Doe 1, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On November 15, 1984, John Doe 1 was convicted in Elmore County, State of Idaho, of an Infamous Crime Against Nature, against a child the age of 11 years. He was granted a Withheld Judgment and was placed on supervised probation for a period of ten (10) years. In 1993, John Doe 1 was informed that he was required to register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 1 completed a sex offender treatment program with Dr. Isom in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. John Doe 1 was released from probation on January 9, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 1 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2005, at the latest and November, 1994, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 1, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Elmore County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-five years after the conviction date.
5 John Doe 1 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 4. Plaintiff, John Doe 2, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On January 3, 1990, John Doe 2 was convicted of two counts of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 12 years and 11 years, felonies. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a minimum fixed period of one (1) year followed by an indeterminate period of six (6) years for each of the counts. These sentences were to be served concurrently. However the Court retained jurisdiction for 120 days and John Doe 2 was placed in Cottonwood for the Sexual Offender Program. On July 20, 1990, John Doe 2 was placed on probation for a period of seven (7) years. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 2 was not required to register. John Doe 2 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 2 completed a sex offender treatment program with S.A.N.E. in 1996, and in January, 1997, John Doe 2 was released from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 2 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2007, at the latest and July, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was
6 below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 2, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of two counts of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty years after the date of conviction. John Doe 2 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 5. Plaintiff, John Doe 3, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On July 19, 1999, John Doe 3 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse with a Minor Under Sixteen, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a period not to exceed eight (8) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho. John Doe 3 was sentenced to serve a minimum of three (3) years in custody and a subsequent indeterminate period of five (5) years. This sentence was suspended by the Court and John Doe 3 was placed on probation for a period of three (3) years. John Doe 3 began registering when his probation began in July, At that time, Idaho Code Section , Release From Registration Requirements stated: Any person, other than one designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 3 completed a sex offender treatment program with McNiel and Associates, LLC, in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, in July, John Doe 3 was granted early release from probation on or
7 about July 7, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 3 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 3, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, ten years after the conviction date. John Doe 3 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 6. Plaintiff, John Doe 4, is a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho. On June 15, 1988, John Doe 4 was convicted in Cassia County, Sate of Idaho, of Lewd and Lascivious Conduct with a Minor, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for a determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed forty-two (42) months. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 180 days. John Doe 4 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years. John Doe 4 completed a sex offender treatment program at Life Cycle Counseling in March, 1995 and was released from probation on April 17, In July, 1998, John Doe 4 was informed that he must begin registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than one designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was
8 released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 4 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, 1998, the same year he was informed he must register. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 4, a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-one years after the date of conviction. John Doe 4 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 7. Plaintiff, John Doe 5, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On August 30, 1988, John Doe 5 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 7 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction, Boise, State of Idaho, for a minimum fixed period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed three (3) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 5 was placed on probation for a period of three (3) years. John Doe 5 violated this probation and, on August 20, 1991, the order for probation was revoked and the original sentence was reinstated, however, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days in the Sex
9 Offender s Program at Cottonwood. On February 13, 1992, it was ordered that John Doe 5 remain in the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections. John Doe 5 was under the custody of Idaho State Board of Corrections for a period of two (2) years. In 1994, John Doe 5 was placed on parole in April, 1994, for a period of two (2) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 5 was released from parole on September 12, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 5 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in September, 2006, at the latest and April, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 5, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, twenty-one years after the date of conviction. John Doe 5 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 8. Plaintiff, John Doe 6, is a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho. On November 15, 1991, John Doe 6 was convicted of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child
10 Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a minimum fixed and determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period up to forty-two (42) months. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 6 was placed on probation for a period of five (5) years. In 1993, John Doe 6 was informed that he must register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. On October 16, 1996, John Doe 6 was released from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 6 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in October, 2006, at the latest and November, 2001, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 6, a resident of Cassia County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eighteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 6 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 9. Plaintiff, John Doe 7, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On December 11, 1992, John Doe 7 was convicted in Bannock County, State of Idaho, of two
11 counts of Sex Abuse of a Child Under the Age of 16, to-wit the age of 10 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed term of three (3) years and a subsequent indeterminate term of four (4) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 7 was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. John Doe 7 completed a sex offender treatment program with Paul Ives and was released from probation on August 24, In 1999, John Doe 7 was advised that he must begin registering as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the release from registration requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 7 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense was amended to include any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 7, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bannock County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seventeen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 7 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry.
12 10. Plaintiff, John Doe 8, is a resident of Jerome County, State of Idaho. On August 1, 1994, John Doe 8 was convicted in Twin Falls County of Rape, a felony, and convicted in Jerome County, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony. John Doe 8 was sentenced to serve a minimum of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed three (3) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days in Cottonwood, the sentence was suspended, and in February, 1995 John Doe 8 was placed on probation for a period of two (2) years. John Doe 8 began registering as a sex offender that year. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 8 completed a sex offender treatment program with Gail Ater and Paul Ives. John Doe 8 was released from probation on March 24, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 8 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in March, 2007, at the latest and February, 2005, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. In November, 2011, John Doe 8 attempted to be removed from the sex offender registry, but was denied. Plaintiff, John Doe 8, a resident of Jerome County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho and a sexual offense in Jerome
13 County, State of Idaho in John Doe 8 petitioned to be removed from the registry in 2011, but was denied. His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fifteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 8 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 11. Plaintiff, John Doe 9, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On April 14, 1992, John Doe 9 was convicted in Ada County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Under Sixteen, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Correction for an aggregate term of five (5) years which consisted of a minimum period of confinement of one (1) year followed by a subsequent indeterminate period of custody not to exceed four (4) years. However, the court retained jurisdiction for 180 days to suspend execution of Judgment. On April 14, 1992, John Doe 9 was placed on probation for a five (5) year period. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 9 was not required to register. John Doe 9 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. In 1996, John Doe 9 completed the sex offender treatment program with the S.A.N.E. Program and he was released from probation on April 6, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 9 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, 2009, at the latest and April, 2002, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated
14 offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 9, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Ada County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seventeen years after the conviction date. John Doe 9 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 12. Plaintiff, John Doe 10, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On April 24, 1992, John Doe 10 was convicted in Jerome County, State of Idaho, of Rape, to-wit the age of 16 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed eight (8) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days. On April 21, 1992, John Doe 10 was placed on probation for a period of two (2) years. At this time, the Sex Offender Registry was not in place and John Doe 10 was not required to register. John Doe 10 was contacted in 1993 and informed that he must register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 10 completed a sex offender treatment program with Paul Ives and was released from probation on May 5, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 10 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in May, 2004, the latest and April, 2002, at
15 the earliest. In this same year, John Doe 10 petitioned the Court for removal from the registry, but was denied because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where a person who committed an aggravated offense was ineligible to petition. The definition of an aggravated offense, at this time, included rape, but excluding section (1) where the victim is at least twelve (12) years of age or the defendant is eighteen (18) years of age or younger. Because of this amendment, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 10, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Jerome County, State of Idaho in He petitioned to be released from the sex offender registry in 2004 and was denied. His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, nine years after the date of conviction. John Doe 10 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 13. Plaintiff, John Doe 11, is a resident of Bingham County, State of Idaho. On July 9, 1993, John Doe 11 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 3 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period of up to forty-two (42) months at the Idaho State Board of Corrections. This sentence was suspended and John Doe 11 was placed on probation for a period of sixty (60) months. At this time, John Doe 11 was advised that he must register as a sex offender and the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date
16 of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 11 violated his probation in 1996, and was reinstated on his original sixty (60) month probation with additional conditions. John Doe 11 was released from probation on July 19, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 11 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, 2008, at the latest and July, 2003, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 11, a resident of Bingham County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, eight years after the conviction date. John Doe 11 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 14. Plaintiff, John Doe 12, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. On February 14, 1995, John Doe 12 was convicted in Nez Perce County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit of the age of 12 years of age, a felony. He was sentenced to a period of fifteen (15) years consisting of a minimum of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period of ten (10) years at the Idaho State Board of Correction, Boise, State of Idaho. John Doe 12 was released from the Idaho State Board of Correction and placed on parole in September, John Doe 12 began registering on or about September 18, 2003 and at this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who
17 has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 12 completed sex offender treatment in January, 2010, and was discharged from probation in February, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 12 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in September, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 12, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Nez Perce County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fourteen years after the conviction date. John Doe 12 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 15. Plaintiff, John Doe 13, is a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho. In February, 1990, John Doe 13 was convicted in Canyon County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 10 years, a felony. He was sentenced to seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. John Doe 13 was to serve a minimum of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period of four (4) years. However this sentence was suspended and John
18 Doe 13 was placed on probation for a period of seven (7) years. John Doe 13 was advised that he must register as a sex offender in At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. In January, 1996, John Doe 13 was placed on unsupervised probation and in April of the same year, was discharged from probation. During probation, John Doe 13 completed a sex offender treatment program with Dr. Stoner in Ada County, State of Idaho. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 13 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in January, 2006, at the latest and February, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 13, a resident of Ada County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Canyon County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, eleven years after the conviction date. John Doe 13 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 16. Plaintiff, John Doe 14, is a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho. On December 27, 1993, John Doe 14 was convicted in Franklin County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 9 years, a
19 felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho for a determinate period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed ten (10) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days. John Doe 14 was placed on probation on July 11, 1994 for a period of five (5) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on probation, John Doe 14 completed a sex offender treatment program with ISAT. John Doe 14 was released from probation in December, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 14 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in December, 2009, at the latest and July, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 14, a resident of Franklin County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Franklin County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, fifteen years after the date of conviction. John Doe 14 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 17. Plaintiff, John Doe 15, is a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho. On June 28, 1996, John Doe 15 was convicted in Cassia County, State of Idaho, of Lewd
20 Conduct with a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 13 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a minimum fixed and determinate period of eighteen (18) months followed by an indeterminate period of up to forty-two (42) months. This sentence was suspended after John Doe 15 successfully completed the Rider program and was placed on probation for a period of forty-eight (48) months. During John Doe 15 s time in Cottonwood, he competed a sex offender treatment program. John Doe 15 began registering in 1996 and, at this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 15 was released from probation in June, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 15 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in June, 2010, at the latest and June, 2006, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of an aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 15, a resident of Minidoka County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Cassia County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, thirteen years after the conviction date. John Doe 15 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 18. Plaintiff, John Doe 16, is a resident of Bannock County, State of Idaho. On
21 January 25, 2002, John Doe 16 was convicted in Bannock County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the Idaho Department of Corrections, State of Idaho for a fixed term of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate term not to exceed seven (7) years. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 16 served one (1) year in the Bannock County Jail with work release. On November 18, 2002, John Doe 16 was granted early release from the Bannock County Jail and was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. The following day, November 19, 2002, John Doe 16 was required to register as a sex offender in the State of Idaho. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 16 completed a sex offender treatment program with Kenneth Lindsey at Southeast Idaho Center for Neurobehavioral and Developmental Disorders on November 11, On December 1, 2009, John Doe 16 was discharged from probation. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 16 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in November Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being
22 removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 16, a resident of Bannock County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Bannock County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 16 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 19. Plaintiff, John Doe 17, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On April 22, 2002, John Doe 17 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under the Age of Sixteen Years, to-wit the age of 7 or 8 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Boise, State of Idaho, for a unified sentence of fifteen (15) years. This was comprised of a minimum period of confinement of two (2) years, followed by an indeterminate period of custody of thirteen (13) years. This sentence was suspended for the first 180 days, and the Court retained jurisdiction. John Doe 17 completed the Rider program and was placed on probation on or about October 28, 2002 for a period of ten (10) years and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 17 completed a sex offender treatment program with McNeil and Associates while on probation and did not violate his
23 probation. John Doe 17 was discharged from probation on or about November 8, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 17 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in October, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included any other offense set forth in section , Idaho Code, if at the time of the commission of the offense the victim was below the age of thirteen years, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 17, a resident of Twin Falls County, Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the conviction date. John Doe 17 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 20. Plaintiff, John Doe 18, is a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho. On November 13, 1989, John Doe 18 was convicted in Lincoln County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor, to-wit the age of 11 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a determinate period of three (3) years, followed by an indeterminate period of time not to exceed seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. This sentence was suspended and the Court retained jurisdiction. During this 180 day Rider program, John Doe 18 took part in the sex offender treatment program. In August, 1990, John Doe 18 was placed on supervised probation for a period of five (5) years. In 1993, John Doe 18 was advised that he was required to register as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on
24 probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. John Doe 18 was discharged from probation August 28, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 18 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in August, 2005, at the latest and August, 2000, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, where the definition of an aggravated offense now included Idaho Code: (lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age), he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 18, a resident of Lincoln County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Lincoln County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2001, twelve years after the conviction date. John Doe 18 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 21. Plaintiff, John Doe 19, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On September 3, 2002, John Doe 19 was convicted in the County of Twin Falls, State of Idaho of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 15 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho for a determinate period of five (5) years followed by an indeterminate period of ten (10) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for 180 days and John Doe 19 was placed on probation for a period of fifteen (15) years beginning March 3, At this time, John Doe 19 began registering as a sex offender and the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a
25 recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation, John Doe 19 completed sex offender treatment programs and he was granted early release from probation on April 30, Based on the abovecited facts, John Doe 19 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in March, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 19, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, seven years after the date of conviction. John Doe 19 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 22. Plaintiff, John Doe 20, is a resident of Teton County, State of Idaho. On March 28, 2001, John Doe 20 was convicted in Teton County, State of Idaho of Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 16 Years of Age, to-wit the age of 12 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections, Sate of Idaho for a determinate period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed
26 nine (9) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 120 days and John Doe 20 was placed on probation for a period of ten (10) years. At this time John Doe 20 was required to register and, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. John Doe 20 completed a sex offender treatment plan with New Beginnings in May, 2004 and was granted early release from probation in November Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 20 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in April, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. In July, 2012, John Doe 20 filed a Petition for Release from Registration Requirements and Expungement and other required documents, however, he was soon advised that the State would appeal his release. John Doe 20 then abandoned this attempt. Plaintiff, John Doe 20, a resident of Teton County, State of Idaho, was convicted of a sexual offense in Teton County, State of Idaho in John Doe 20 s offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eight years after the conviction date. John Doe 20 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex
27 Offender Registry. 23. Plaintiff, John Doe 21, is a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho. On May 29, 2001, John Doe 21 was convicted in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 14 years, a felony. He was sentenced to a fixed minimum period of three (3) years followed by an indeterminate period of seven (7) years at the Idaho State Board of Corrections, State of Idaho. However, this sentence was suspended and John Doe 21 was placed on supervised probation for a period of four (4) years beginning on July 9, John Doe 21 began registering as a sex offender in July 2001 and at this time, the Release from Registration Requirements stated: Any person, other than a recidivist, an offender who has been convicted of an aggravated offense, or an offender designated as a violent sexual predator, may, after a period of ten (10) years from the date the person was released from incarceration or placed on parole, supervised release or probation, whichever is greater, petition the district court for a show cause hearing to determine whether the person shall be exempted from the duty to register as a sexual offender. While on probation John Doe 21 completed a sex offender treatment program with Gail Ater and was released from probation on July 11, Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 21 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in July, Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2009, where a section of the definition of aggravated offense was changed from lewd conduct, when the victim is less than twelve (12) years of age to lewd conduct, he was, and still is foreclosed from ever being removed from the sex offender registry. Plaintiff, John Doe 21, a resident of Twin Falls County, State of Idaho, was
28 convicted of a sexual offense in Twin Falls County, State of Idaho in His offense was not considered aggravated until July 1, 2009, eight years after the date of conviction. John Doe 21 is now required to register for life as an aggravated offender on the Idaho Sex Offender Registry. 24. Plaintiff, John Doe 22, is a resident of Bonneville County, State of Idaho. On December 18, 1991, John Doe 22 was convicted in Bonneville County, State of Idaho, of Lewd Conduct with a Minor Child Under the Age of 16 Years, to-wit the age of 5 years, a felony. He was sentenced to the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years. This consisted of a fixed determinate period of two (2) years followed by an indeterminate period not to exceed eight (8) years. However, the Court retained jurisdiction for a period of 120 days and at the Review Hearing on or about February 13, 1992, John Doe 22 was placed in the custody of the Idaho State Board of Corrections for his original sentence. John Doe 22 served two (2) years and was released on parole in 1994 and began registering as a sex offender. At this time, the Idaho legislature had enacted the Sex Offender Registration Act. C. 155, 1, 1993 Idaho Sess. Laws 391, This act required sex offenders to register while on probation and for a period of ten (10) years after the date of discharge from probation, parole or release from incarceration, whichever is greater.. While on parole, John Doe 22 completed a sex offender treatment program and on November 20, 2001, John Doe 22 was released from parole. Based on the above-cited facts, John Doe 22 would have had standing to petition to be released from registration requirements in November, 2011, at the latest and February, 2004, at the earliest. Because of the ex post facto amendments in effect from July 1, 2001, an offender who committed an aggravated offense was excluded from
IDAHO STATE LEGISLATURE. CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE STATISTICS 24 th Annual Report I.C. 67-1405 JULY 1, 2011 JUNE 30, 2012
IDAHO STATE LEGISLATURE CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE STATISTICS 24 th Annual Report I.C. 67-1405 JULY 1, 2011 JUNE 30, 2012 Joint Submission by The Office of the Governor C. L. Butch Otter and The Office of the
More informationCOMPLAINT. 1. This action arises under Article I, 2, 7, 10 and 12 of the Rhode Island
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT ) DENNIS GESMONDI, DALLAS HUARD) and GEORGE MADANCY, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) C.A. No. ) STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, ) RHODE ISLAND ATTORNEY ) GENERAL, and PROVIDENCE
More informationLEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 2015 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 1026
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 0 IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO. 0 BY JUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE 0 0 0 0 AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE;
More informationHON. GEORGE E. PATAKI, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, et al.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------X JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE, AND SAMUEL POE, individually and on behalf of all other persons
More informationPETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION
PETITIONS TO TERMINATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Jamie Markham Assistant Professor, School of Government 919.843.3914 markham@sog.unc.edu October 2013 A. Length of Registration There are two categories
More information64th Legislature AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE
64th Legislature HB0088 AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING LAWS REGARDING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION; REQUIRING THE OFFENDER TO PROVIDE E-MAIL ADDRESSES AND SOCIAL MEDIA SCREEN NAMES WHEN REGISTERING; REQUIRING
More informationJUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS
JUSTICE SYSTEM: FOCUS ON SEX OFFENDERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Sex Offender Laws... 1 Jacob Wetterling Act of 1994... 2 Megan s Law (1996)... 2 Pam Lychner Act of 1996... 2 Adam Walsh Act of 2006...
More informationAN ACT RELATING TO SEX OFFENDERS; REQUIRING ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION; REQUIRING SEX OFFENDERS TO REGISTER AND UPDATE
AN ACT RELATING TO SEX OFFENDERS; REQUIRING ADDITIONAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION; REQUIRING SEX OFFENDERS TO REGISTER AND UPDATE INFORMATION WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS; PROVIDING FOR VERIFICATION OF REGISTRATION;
More informationJUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION
JUVENILE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION Requirements, Penalties & Relief Oregon law requires a juvenile found to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court of certain sex offenses to register as a sex
More informationSEALING OF RECORDS. Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE. DAVID ROGER District Attorney
SEALING OF RECORDS Conviction / Acquittal / Dismissal CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY S OFFICE DAVID ROGER District Attorney NOTICE: This Website contains instructions for using the Clark County District
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationKansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2015 M-1 Tort Claims Act M-2 Death Penalty in Kansas M-3 Kansas Administrative Procedure Act M-4 Sex
More informationHOUSE BILL No. 2172. AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks.
Session of HOUSE BILL No. By Representative Whipple - 0 0 AN ACT concerning nurse aide trainees; criminal background checks. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section. (a) A sponsor
More informationCollection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:-
Budget Amendment ID: FY2014-S3-90 Collection of Data on Juvenile Justice Ms. Creem and Mr. Tarr moved that the bill be amended by inserting, after section, the following new section:- JUD 90 SECTION. (a)
More information10 LC 29 4233S A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
House Bill 571 (COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE) By: Representatives Ralston of the 7 th, Keen of the 179 th, and Golick of the 34 th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
More informationMahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court. Table of Contents. 2 Grand Jury 2. 3 Dismissals.. 3. 4 Appointment of Counsel... 4
Mahoning County Criminal Local Rules of Court Table of Contents Rule Page 1 Applicability. 1 2 Grand Jury 2 3 Dismissals.. 3 4 Appointment of Counsel...... 4 5 Case Filing and Court Designation. 6 6 Arraignment...
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40618 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 40618 LARRY DEAN CORWIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 386 Filed: February 20, 2014 Stephen
More informationConsequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes
Consequences of Convictions for Sex Crimes Sex Offender Registration Act, Sex Offender Commitment Act, Lifetime Supervision for Sex Offenders SORA 29 Chapter 40 1 Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA):
More informationVictims of Crime Act
Victims of Crime Act PURPOSE Recognizing the state's concern for victims of crime, it is the purpose of the Victims of Crime Act [31-26-1 NMSA 1978] to assure that: A. the full impact of a crime is brought
More informationInformation for Crime Victims and Witnesses
Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)
More informationWEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. Senate Bill 411
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE 2016 REGULAR SESSION Introduced Senate Bill 411 BY SENATORS WALTERS, LAIRD, KESSLER, MILLER, FACEMIRE, ROMANO AND GAUNCH [Introduced January 27, 2016; Referred to the Committee
More informationCHAPTER 846E REGISTRATION OF SEX OFFENDERS AND OTHER COVERED OFFENDERS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO REGISTRATION INFORMATION
CHAPTER 846E REGISTRATION OF SEX OFFENDERS AND OTHER COVERED OFFENDERS AND PUBLIC ACCESS TO REGISTRATION INFORMATION Section 846E-1 Definitions 846E-2 Registration requirements 846E-3 Access to registration
More informationSex and Violent Crime Offender Registration
Sex and Violent Crime Offender Registration... 1 I. Registration of Sex Offenders... 1 A. Applicable Sex Offenses... 1 B. Designation Criteria for Sex Offender Level Assignment... 4 C. Duration of Registration...
More informationAB 109 is DANGEROUS. Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011.
AB 109 is DANGEROUS Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011. Governor Brown stated in his signing message on AB 109 - "For too long, the state s prison
More informationNO. COA12-1221 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 19 March 2013
NO. COA12-1221 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 March 2013 PAUL E. WALTERS, Plaintiff v. Nash County No. 12 CVS 622 ROY A. COOPER, III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE
More informationARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1.1. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Parole Board 220 IAC 1.1-1-1 Parole board membership (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Parole Board; filed Jun 15, 1987, 2:45 pm: 10 IR 2496) 220 IAC 1.1-1-2 Definitions
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 700 Civic Center Drive West P.O. Box 22024 Santa Ana, CA 92702-2024 (877) 872-2122 www.occourts.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CERTIFICATE OF REHABILITATION AND PARDON Forms and Penal Code 4852.01, and 4852.06 Instruction Sheet Notice of Filing of Proof of Service Certificate of Rehabilitation
More informationThe rights of crime victims in Maryland. The role and responsibilities of Law Enforcement
The rights of crime victims in Maryland The role and responsibilities of Law Enforcement Prepared by the Governor s Office of Crime Control & Prevention and the Maryland State Board of Victim Services
More informationMontana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office. Memorandum
Montana Legislative Services Division Legal Services Office PO BOX 201706 Helena, MT 59620-1706 (406) 444-3064 FAX (406) 444-3036 Memorandum To: Law and Justice Interim Committee From: Julianne Burkhardt
More informationINSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26
INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26 Petition Form Carefully read the attached form to fill out your Petition for Expungement of Criminal Records
More informationRHODE ISLAND SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION
RHODE ISLAND SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION CONTACT INFORMATION Rhode Island State Police Bureau of Criminal Investigation 150 South Main Street Providence, RI 02903-2907 Telephone: 401-421-5268
More informationKANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES I. MISSION The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce the
More informationSORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Delaware
SORNA Substantial Implementation Review State of Delaware The U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking
More informationIdaho Manual on the Rights of Victims of Crime
Office of the Attorney General Idaho Manual on the Rights of Victims of Crime JULY 2004 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General 700 West State Street Boise, ID 83720-0010 www.ag.idaho.gov State of Idaho Office
More informationSexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Civil Commitment
Sexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Civil Commitment The Massachusetts SDP statute, G.L. c. 123A, allows for an individual to be civilly committed (incarcerated) for a day to life if that person has been found
More informationFamily Policy Compliance Office Guidelines: Disclosure of Education Records Concerning Registered Sex Offenders
Family Policy Compliance Office Guidelines: Disclosure of Education Records Concerning Registered Sex Offenders This guidance concerns an amendment to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974
More informationUNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RICHARD MILLER, of the ) Town of Searsport, County of ) Waldo, State of Maine, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) DALE MCCORMICK in her official capacity ) as Director and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 104,581. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, RAYMOND L. ROSS, III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 104,581 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RAYMOND L. ROSS, III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A sentence of 162 months' imprisonment with lifetime postrelease
More informationIssue Brief. Arizona State Senate ARIZONA SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION INTRODUCTION ADAM WALSH ACT. November 23, 2009.
Arizona State Senate Issue Brief November 23, 2009 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members
More informationFiling Fee $117.00. Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record
Filing Fee $117.00 Instructions for Sealing a Criminal Record Effective 1-1-2015 This packet is to be used to assist you in filing an application to seal your criminal record. * * * * * * * * * * * * *
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 375
SESSION OF 2010 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 375 As Amended by Senate Committee on Judiciary Brief* SB 375, as amended, would repeal the crime of capital murder. It also would remove the death
More informationNOTICE TO GRANDPARENT
A Power of Atrney may be created if the parent, guardian, or cusdian of the child is any of the following: 1. Seriously ill, incarcerated, or about be incarcerated 2. Temporarily unable provide financial
More informationCASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:12-cv-02811-RHK-SER Document 1 Filed 11/02/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA File No. Julius Chad Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. Dave Bellows, in his individual and official
More informationSecond Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP
Second Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. -0.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL - Kagan, Lee HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Guzman, Ulibarri SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
More informationCOLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY
COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE ADJUDICATIONS OF DELINQUENCY This document is meant to provide general information about the collateral consequences of juvenile adjudications. This document is not
More information(1) Sex offenders who have been convicted of: * * * an attempt to commit any offense listed in this subdivision. (a)(1). * * *
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
More informationBEFORE THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE STATE OF IDAHO. This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing on November 3,
Hearing Officer 714 North 5th street P.O. Box 1678 Boise, Idaho 83701 Telephone: (208) 342-8931 Facsimile: (208) 384-5686 Idaho state Bar No. 1763 FILED ~ NOV 1 2 2010 Department of Insurance State of
More informationMISSISSIPPI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 32, 57.3 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1673 Complaints (2007) Updated December 21, 2008
MISSISSIPPI IDENTITY THEFT RANKING BY STATE: Rank 32, 57.3 Complaints Per 100,000 Population, 1673 Complaints (2007) Updated December 21, 2008 Current Laws: A person shall not obtain or attempt to obtain
More informationCERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET
CERTIFICATE OF REHAB. & PARDON INSTRUCTION FORMS PACKET PKG-016 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION, 220 W. BROADWAY, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3814 EAST COUNTY DIVISION, 250 E.
More informationLivescan cards, when received, apply electronically to the DCI & FBI records
Juveniles should be fingerprinted upon being taken into custody for any serious or aggravated misdemeanor or felony charge and the Final Disposition Report started Livescan electronically submits cards
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION 140 CHAPTER 1950. ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE OR INTIMIDATION ACT Rule 1951.
More informationA Guide to Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in Illinois
State of Illinois Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor Illinois State Police Larry G. Trent, Director A Guide to Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in Illinois January 1, 2006 Illinois State Police
More informationAn act relative to updating Massachusetts sex offender laws
An act relative to updating Massachusetts sex offender laws SECTION 1. Chapter 6 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking out sections 178C to 178Q, inclusive, as appearing in the 2010 Official
More informationFirst Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Michael Dohr x HOUSE BILL 1-1 HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Lebsock and Tate, (None), SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees
More informationARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES
ARTICLE 36: KANE COUNTY DRUG REHABILITATION COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES (a) Mission: The Illinois General Assembly has recognized that there is a critical need for a criminal justice program that will reduce
More informationANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER
ANSWER PACKET NON-SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS ON PREPARING AN ANSWER You are strongly encouraged to obtain help from an attorney in order to protect your rights and to correctly follow all the applicable substantive
More informationOLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT:
OLMSTED COUNTY ATTORNEY DOMESTIC ABUSE PROSECUTION POLICY POLICY STATEMENT: It is the policy of the Olmsted County Attorney to pursue all domestic abuse allegations with zealous, yet discretionary prosecution
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2006 Session SB 237 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Senate Bill 237 Judicial Proceedings (The President, et al.) (By Request Administration) Sexual Offender
More information2010 REVISIONS TO GEORGIA SEX OFFENDER LAW: A SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 571 FOR MEMBERS OF THE WHITAKER V. PERDUE CLASS
2010 REVISIONS TO GEORGIA SEX OFFENDER LAW: A SUMMARY OF KEY PROVISIONS OF HB 571 FOR MEMBERS OF THE WHITAKER V. PERDUE CLASS House Bill 571 made significant changes to Georgia law governing persons on
More informationHow to Apply for a Pardon. State of California. Office of the Governor
How to Apply for a Pardon State of California Office of the Governor Statement of Philosophy A California Governor's pardon is an honor traditionally granted only to individuals who have demonstrated exemplary
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Filed 7/7/16 P. v. Salazar CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationLANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT
LANCASTER COUNTY ADULT DRUG COURT Administered by the Lancaster County Department of Community Corrections Judicial Oversight by the Lancaster County District Court www.lancaster.ne.gov keyword: drug court
More informationFrequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment
Frequently Asked Questions on 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment AB 109 (Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011) as subsequently amended by AB 117 (Chapter 39, Statutes of 2011) and ABX1 17 (Chapter 12, Statutes
More informationCriminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 364.02 Criminals; Rehabilitation CHAPTER 364 CRIMINAL OFFENDERS; REHABILITATION 364.01 POLICY. 364.02 DEFINITIONS. 364.021 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT; CONSIDERATION OF CRIMINAL
More informationCRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE. André de Gruy Capital Defender
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE André de Gruy Capital Defender Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force Created - HB 1231 2013 Leg. Judge and Prosecutor concerns about lack of certainty in sentencing/time-served
More informationState Enactments Imposing Restrictions on Sex Offenders, especially as related to contact with children. February 2006
State Enactments Imposing Restrictions on Sex Offenders, especially as related to contact with children February 2006 The following are laws that broadly impose restrictions and penalties on sex offenders.
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 51: SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT Table of Contents Part 3.... Section 1251. IMPRISONMENT FOR MURDER... 3 Section 1252. IMPRISONMENT FOR CRIMES OTHER THAN MURDER...
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON
More informationDUI. The funds received under the provisions of this subsection shall be distributed as follows:
DUI 63-1-46. [Effective 10/1/2014] [Fees for reinstatement of license subsequent to suspension, revocation or cancellation generally; disposition of fees; procedure and fees for reinstatement of license
More informationSenate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security
Senate Bill No. 86 Committee on Transportation and Homeland Security CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to offenses; providing that counseling and evaluations required for certain offenses may be conducted in
More informationCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs erin.sasse@cdcr.ca.gov (916) 445-4950 WHAT IS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
More informationVirginia State Crime Commission s Sex Offender Task Force
Virginia State Crime Commission s Sex Offender Task Force Formation of Virginia s Sex Offender Task Force Heinous crimes against children committed by sex offenders in other states have been well publicized
More informationSTATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 789 By: Wilkerson COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE [ corrections - judicial review - modifying when report is provided
More informationCase No. CV-12-5564. Plaintiff, the State ofidaho, Department of Finance ("Department"), and Defendant, Bart
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN Attorney General ALAN CONILOGUE Deputy Attorney General State ofidaho P. 0. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0031 Telephone: 208.332.8093 Fax: 208.332.8016 ISBN 3196 alan.conilogue@finance.idaho.gov
More informationReentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013
Reentry on Steroids! NADCP 2013 Panel Introductions Judge Keith Starrett Moderator Judge Robert Francis Panelist Judge Stephen Manley Panelist Charles Robinson - Panelist Dallas SAFPF 4-C Reentry Court
More informationINFORMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES CHARLES I. WADAMS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
INFORMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES CHARLES I. WADAMS PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Garden City, Idaho 6015 Glenwood St., Garden City, ID 83714 (208) 472-2900 www.gardencityidaho.org A MESSAGE Garden City
More informationRESOLUTION NO. 424 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION NO. 424 A RESOLUTION OF THE WOODINVILLE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING PUBLIC DEFENSE STANDARDS, DIRECTING STAFF TO BEGIN A PROCESS TO EVALUATE CASELOAD COUNTS, REVIEW STANDARDS, AND POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
More information2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the
SB138 Engrossed LRB9203748RCcd 1 AN ACT concerning drug treatment. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 1. Short title. This Act may
More informationCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT? PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Revises the definition of a felony
More informationAN ACT. The goals of the alcohol and drug treatment divisions created under this Chapter include the following:
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
More informationEmployer Instructions for Use ODH Form 805 Uniform Employment Application for Nurse Aide Staff
Effective November 1, 2012 Employer Instructions for Use ODH Form 805 Uniform Employment Application for Nurse Aide Staff Purpose This form is to be used by employers as the only employment application
More informationCHAPTER 89. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
CHAPTER 89 AN ACT concerning juvenile justice, amending and supplementing various parts of the statutory law, and repealing section 7 of P.L.1982, c.77. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly
More informationREFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS BILL #: CS/HB 101 Violation of an Injunction for Protection SPONSOR(S): Criminal Justice Subcommittee; Rodríguez, J. TIED BILLS: None IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 380 REFERENCE
More informationWHY NEBRASKA NEEDS CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR SEX OFFENDERS
WHY NEBRASKA NEEDS CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR SEX OFFENDERS DON STENBERGt INTRODUCTION David Burdette had a well-established career as a serial rapist in 1982 when he decided to begin raping the
More informationCouncilmembers Jim Graham and Tommy Wells introduced the following bill, which was referred to the Committee on.
1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 Councilmember Tommy Wells Councilmember Jim Graham A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Councilmembers Jim Graham and Tommy Wells introduced the following bill, which was referred
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.
More informationAs Re-reported by the Senate Judiciary--Criminal Justice Committee. 127th General Assembly Regular Session Sub. S. B. No. 108 2007-2008 A B I L L
As Re-reported by the Senate Judiciary--Criminal Justice Committee 127th General Assembly Regular Session Sub. S. B. No. 108 2007-2008 Senator Schaffer Cosponsors: Senators Stivers, Schuring, Cafaro, Mason
More informationAugust 2, 2013. Mark Keel, Chief State Law Enforcement Division Post Office Box 21398 Columbia, South Carolina 29221.
ALAN WILSON ATIORNEY GENERAL Mark Keel, Chief State Law Enforcement Division Post Office Box 21398 Columbia, South Carolina 29221 Dear Chief Keel, You seek an opinion of this Office as to whether an individual
More informationCrimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7
New South Wales Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 No 7 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 2 5 Definitions of serious sex offence
More informationPurpose of the Victim/Witness Unit
Purpose of the Victim/Witness Unit The Victim/Witness Assistance Division of the Lake County State s Attorney s Office was formed to serve the needs of people like you. The division is meant to ensure
More informationProposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
More information2014 Chelsea s Law Impact Report A 12-Month Review of San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and Sacramento Counties
Report Objective 2014 Chelsea s Law Impact Report A 12-Month Review of San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and Sacramento Counties Each year, Chelsea s Light Foundation prepares an annual Chelsea
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1354 **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1354 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AARON ORLANDO RICHARDS ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. CR133795
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:12-cv-00547-CWD Document 38 Filed 12/30/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ALBERT MOORE, v. Petitioner, Case No. 1:12-cv-00547-CWD MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 2605. September Term, 2002 HENRY L. PITTS STATE OF MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2605 September Term, 2002 HENRY L. PITTS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J., Getty, James S., (Retired, specially assigned), Moylan, Charles E.,
More informationAdult Plea Negotiation Guidelines
From the office of the Rice County Attorney: Adult Plea Negotiation Guidelines Revision June, 2004 1. These guidelines apply to any adult felony defendant case prosecuted by this office, which is not disposed
More informationGETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
Patricia A. DeAngelis District Attorney GETTING TO KNOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AN OFFENSE IS COMMITTED There are three types of offenses that can be committed in New York State: VIOLATION MISDEMEANOR
More informationArizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights. Arizona Revised Statutes:
Arizona Laws Arizona Constitution: Article II, Section 2.1 Victims Bill of Rights Arizona Revised Statutes: Title 13, Chapter 40 Crime Victims Rights Title 8, Chapter 3, Article 7 Victims Rights for Juvenile
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : SAM STINSON, on his behalf : and on behalf of all persons : similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs : Civil Action File v.
More information