MSUM COURSE SYLLABUS. ED 632 Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning Theory
|
|
|
- Bryce Morton
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MSUM COURSE SYLLABUS ED 632 Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning Theory CREDIT HOURS: 4 Semester Hours CLASS TIME: Spring INSTRUCTOR: Dr. Mike Coquyt OFFICE: 216C Lommen Hall, MSUM [email protected] OFFICE PHONE: (Cell) Office Hours: Wednesday 8:00-4:00 & Thursday 8:00-3:00 (anytime via ) Course Description Education 632 provides school leaders with the ability to understand major curriculum design models, interpret school district curricula, initiate needs analyses, plan and implement with staff a framework for instruction, align curriculum with anticipated outcomes (graduation standards), monitor social and technological developments as they affect curriculum, and adjust content as needs and conditions change. Purpose of Course The purpose of Education 632 is to familiarize teachers and administrators with foundations of curriculum development and assessment at national, state, and local levels. Emphasis is given to providing knowledge and skills pertaining to student learning, pedagogy, and effective school and classroom leadership. Students engage in collaborative group exercises designed to emulate a school/community initiative for the development and implementation of a curriculum and assessment plan to enhance student learning. Required Textbooks Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing. Performance Outcomes Performance Outcomes Minnesota Administrative Competencies addressed in this include the following: ED 632 Core Competencies
2 A: A9, A10 9 Demonstrate the ability to facilitate and motivate others; 10 Demonstrate the ability to implement change or educational reform. B: B2 2 Define and use processes for gathering, analyzing, managing and using data to plan and make decisions for program evaluation; C: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5 1 Demonstrate an understanding and recognition of the significance of diversity, and respond to the needs of diverse learners; 2 Create and monitor a positive learning environment for all students; 3 Create and monitor a positive working environment for all staff; 4 Promote sensitivity of diversity throughout the school community; 5 Demonstrate the ability to adapt educational programming to the needs of diverse constituencies. F: F2, F6 2 Demonstrate facilitation skills 6 Make presentations that are clear and easy to understand H: H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6, H7 1 Demonstrate the ability to enhance teaching and learning through curriculum assessment and strategic planning for all learners, including pre-k-elementary, middle/junior high school, high school, special education and adult levels; 2 Demonstrate the ability to provide planning and methods to anticipate trends and educational implications; 3 Demonstrate the ability to develop, implement and monitor procedures to align, sequence and articulate curriculum and validate curricular procedures; 4 Demonstrate the ability to identify instructional objectives and use valid and reliable performance indicators and evaluative procedures to measure performance outcomes; 5 Appropriately use learning technologies; 6 Demonstrate an understanding of alternative instructional designs, curriculum, behavior management and assessment accommodations and modifications; 7 Demonstrate an understanding of the urgency of global competitiveness. I: I1, I2, I3, I4, I5, I6 1 Demonstrate an understanding of research of learning and instructional strategies; 2 Describe and apply research and best practices on integrating curriculum and resources to help all learners achieve at high levels; 3 Demonstrate the ability to utilize data for instructional decision making; 4 Demonstrate the ability to design appropriate assessment strategies for measuring learner outcomes; 5 Demonstrate the ability to implement alternative instructional designs, curriculum, behavior management, and assessment accommodations and modifications; 6 Demonstrate the ability to appropriately use technology to support instruction; Principals Competencies: A: A1, A2 B: B1, B6 1 Demonstrate the ability to understand and apply school-wide literacy and numeracy systems; 2 Demonstrate the ability to understand and apply district-wide literacy and numeracy systems.
3 1 Demonstrate the ability to create a culture that fosters a community of learners 2 Demonstrate the ability to understand and support a comprehensive program of student activities C: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5 1 Demonstrate understanding of the articulation and alignment of curriculum from pre-school through grade 12; 2 Demonstrate understanding of different organizational systems and structures at pre-k, elementary, middle or junior high and high school levels; 3 Demonstrate the ability to work with children of all ages; 4 Demonstrate the ability to work with parents, teachers and other staff in all levels of schooling; 5 Demonstrate understanding of the characteristics of effective transition from one level of schooling to the next National Board of Professional Teaching Standards Proposition 1: Teachers are Committed to Students and Learning 1A 1B 1C 1D National Board Certified Teachers (NBCT) s are dedicated to making knowledge accessible to all students. They believe all students can learn. They treat students equitably. They recognize the individual differences that distinguish their students from one another and they take account for these differences in their practice. NBCTs understand how students develop and learn. They respect the cultural and family differences students bring to their classroom. Proposition 2: Teachers Know the Subjects They Teach and How to Teach Those Subjects to Students. 2B 2C They have skill and experience in teaching it, and they are very familiar with the skills gaps and preconceptions students may bring to the subject. They are able to use diverse instructional strategies to teach for understanding. Proposition 3: Teachers are Responsible for Managing and Monitoring Student Learning. 3A 3B 3C 3D NBCTs deliver effective instruction. They move fluently through a range of instructional techniques, keeping students motivated, engaged and focused. They know how to engage students to ensure a disciplined learning environment, and how to organize instruction to meet instructional goals. NBCTs know how to assess the progress of individual students as well as the class as a whole. They use multiple methods for measuring student growth and understanding, and they can clearly explain student performance to parents. Proposition 4: Teachers Think Systematically about Their Practice and Learn from Experience.
4 4A 4B NBCTs model what it means to be an educated person they read, they question, they create and they are willing to try new things. They are familiar with learning theories and instructional strategies and stay abreast of current issues in American education. Proposition 5: Teachers are Members of Learning Communities. 5A 5C 5E NBCTs collaborate with others to improve student learning. They work with other professionals on instructional policy, curriculum development and staff development. They know how to work collaboratively with parents to engage them productively in the work of the school. Students who successfully complete Education 632 will have developed documents and products to demonstrate the ability to demonstrate proficiency with NCATE Standard 2. Standard 2.0: Candidates who complete the program are educational leaders who have the knowledge and ability to promote the success of all students by promoting a positive school culture, providing an effective instructional program, applying best practice to student learning, and designing comprehensive professional growth plans for staff. Elements 2.1 Promote Positive School Culture 2.2 Provide Effective Instructional Program Meets Standards for School Building Leadership a. Candidates assess school culture using multiple methods and implement contextappropriate strategies that capitalize on the diversity (e.g. population, language, disability, gender, race, socio-economic) of the school community to improve school programs and culture. a. Candidates demonstrate the ability to facilitate activities that apply principles of effective instruction to improve instructional practices and curricular materials. b. Candidates demonstrate the ability to make recommendations regarding the design, implementation, and evaluation of a curriculum that fully accommodates learners diverse needs. c. Candidates demonstrate the ability to use and promote technology and information systems to enrich curriculum and instruction, to monitor instructional practices and provide staff the assistance needed for improvement. Meets Standards for School District Leadership a. Candidates develop a sustained approach to improve and maintain a positive district culture for learning that capitalizes on multiple aspects of diversity to meet the learning needs of all students. a. Candidates demonstrate an understanding of a variety of instructional research methodologies and can analyze the comparable strengths and weaknesses of each method. b. Candidates are able to use qualitative and quantitative data, appropriate research methods, technology, and information systems to develop a long-range plan for a district that assesses the district s improvement and accountability systems. c. Candidates demonstrate the ability to use and promote technology and
5 information systems to enrich district curriculum and instruction, monitor instructional practices, and provide assistance to administrators who have needs for improvement. d. Candidates demonstrate the ability to allocate and justify resources to sustain the instructional program. 2.3 Apply Best Practice to Student Learning 2.4 Design Comprehensive Professional Growth Plans a. Candidates demonstrate the ability to assist school personnel in understanding and applying best practices for student learning. b. Candidates apply human development theory, proven learning and motivational theories, and concern for diversity to the learning process. c. Candidates demonstrate an understanding of how to use appropriate research strategies to promote an environment for improved student achievement. a. Candidates design and demonstrate an ability to implement well-planned, contextappropriate professional development programs based on reflective practice and research on student learning consistent with the school vision and goals. b. Candidates demonstrate the ability to use strategies such as observations, collaborative reflection, and adult learning strategies to form comprehensive professional growth a. Candidates demonstrate the ability to facilitate and engage in activities that use best practices and sound educational research to improve instructional programs. b. Candidates demonstrate an ability to assist school and district personnel in understanding and applying best practices for student learning. c. Candidates understand and can apply human development theory, proven learning, and motivational theories, and concern for diversity to the learning process. d. Candidates understand how to use appropriate research strategies to profile student performance in a district and analyze differences among subgroups. a. Candidates demonstrate knowledge of adult learning strategies and the ability to apply technology and research to professional development design focusing on authentic problems and tasks, mentoring, coaching, conferencing, and other techniques that promote new knowledge and skills in the workplace. b. Candidates demonstrate the ability
6 plans with teachers and other school personnel. c. Candidates develop and implement personal professional growth plans that reflect a commitment to life-long learning. to use strategies such as observations and collaborative reflection to help form comprehensive professional growth plans with district and school personnel. c. Candidates develop personal professional growth plans that reflect commitment to life-long learning and best practices. Standard 2.0 Narrative Explanation: This standard addresses the need for educational leaders to position teaching and learning at the focal point of schools. It accepts the proposition that all students can learn and that student learning is the fundamental purpose of schools. To this end, educational leaders are responsible for ensuring that decisions about curriculum, instructional strategies (including instructional technology), assessment, and professional development are based on sound research, best practice, school and district data, and other contextual information and that observation and collaboration are used to design meaningful and effective experiences that improve student achievement. Educational leaders must capitalize on diversity to create a school culture that promotes respect and success for all students. All members of the school community should have confidence in the integrity of the decision-making process for school improvement and the appropriateness of that process, thus ensuring dignity and respect for all. Successful educational leaders must be able to identify, clarify, and address barriers to student learning and communicate the importance of developing learning strategies for diverse populations. In addition, this standard requires that educational leaders be learners who model and encourage life-long learning. They should establish a culture of high expectations for themselves, their students, and their staff. Candidates preparing to lead schools or districts must be able to assess the culture and climate on a regular basis. They must also understand the importance of supervision and be able and willing to evaluate teacher and staff performance using a variety of supervisory models. For a complete list of NCATE standards, see Date Week 1 Topics and Assignments Checklist (Subject to Modification) 1. Review Syllabus and D2L Site (Watch ED 632 Intro. Video) 2. Download Lecture Notes and watch video from Content on D2L 3. Introduce yourself to your classmates and explain what you hope to learn in this course by Date via (Voicethread). Note**All Discussion Questions will be done via Voicethread. 4. Students are to go to their schools and retrieve a document (curriculum map, curriculum guide, course descriptions, essential learnings documents, etc.) that is indicative of curriculum at their school. In other words, formal, explicit, or some other type of curriculum (other than null or hidden). You will need this document for the next Voicethread discussion. (NBCT 4a, 4c, 5a) 5. Watch/Read Chapters 1 & 2 Heacox Video/Power-point 6. Take Curriculum Quiz. 7. Read (Research Problem Question) in Readings/Video tab on D2L 8. Look over 5-Day Differentiated Lesson Plan Assignment at the end of the syllabus
7 and begin making preparations. 9. Identify an issue/problem that you believe exists in your classroom related to your students inability to (do something) read for understanding, get homework in on time, follow proper sequence of steps, take subject seriously or not it is totally up to you. Basically, they are having a hard time learning something. Submit your issue/concern (1 page minimum) in the Drop-Box by DATE. Date Week 2 Topics and Assignments Checklist (Subject to Modification) 1. Download Week 2 Lecture Notes regarding curriculum mapping and essential learning 2. Reflection paper: After reading/reviewing the different learning theories, write a 2-3 page reflection paper identifying how each theory is or is not present in your classroom today. Attempt to link the pedagogical content to the theory if possible. (NBCT 2a, 4a, 4b, 4c) 3. Download curriculum assignment from D2L content under assignments. Directions: In thinking about curriculum for your ideal school district, complete the following sections regarding curriculum. Keep in mind curricular distinctions in the lecture notes and discussion postings regarding curriculum. Assignment covers student understanding of formal, explicit, implicit, null, and extra curriculum. (NBCT 4a, 4c, 5a). Curriculum assignments need to be uploaded to the drop box on D2L by Date. 4. Read Bradbury & Howell document under content on D2L site 5. Read Chapter 3 from Heacox Book 6. Individual (or group) discussions (WebEx) on progress made for Differentiated Lesson Plan. 7. Watch RTI Part 1 video (Shannon Dahlberg) 8. Watch/Read Chapter 4 Heacox Video/Power-Point 9. Post a response to the discussion question and to one other learner by DATE via Voicethread Week 2 Discussion Question: Please summarize the function of the curriculum document you retrieved. In addition, list document aspects that would be viewed as important in terms of practice or application to the educational setting with which the document is associated. If possible, incorporate (tie in) material from the Bradbury and Howell reading. (NBCT 2a, 4a, 4b, 4c) Week 3 1. Download week 3 Lecture Notes 2. Read backward design document under reference documents located under content on D2L 3. Download the syllabus template from assignments under the content section of D2L 4. Review syllabus examples under content on D2L 5. Watch RTI Part 2 video (Shannon Dahlberg) 6. Watch/Read Chapter 5 & 6 Heacox Video/Power-Point 7. Perform a short (2-3 page, minimum 6 source) literature review on the problem/concern from the first week of class. Drop your findings (along with the citations from your articles) into the Drop-Box by DATE. (1a, 1c, 1d, 1e, 2b, 3d, 4a, 4c)
8 8. First WebEx Discussion (Topic-groups-date/ TBD) 9. Take the Curriculum Development Quiz Week 4 Week 5 1. Download Week 4 Lecture Notes that cover demographic information and learning modalities 2. Download and complete modality preferences instrument survey that is located under the assignment section of content on D2L 3. Individual (or group) discussion (via WebEx) on progress made on Differentiated Lesson Plan 4. Complete: (RTI video Reflection Phase 1) and put it in the Drop-Box by DATE. See RTI Reflection Document under Readings Video tab on D2L. 6) Response to Intervention (RTI) Phase 1 assignment. Explain what knowledge or new understanding of previous knowledge have you acquired from the RTI videos that you perceive will influence your practice. Give specific examples from the videos. 2 pages minimum. (1a, 1b, 1e, 2b, 2c, 3c, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5d) 5. Read Chapters 7 & 8 in Heacox Book 1. Download Week 5 Lecture Notes on multiple intelligences and classroom management. 2. Complete Multiple Intelligences Test by going to x.htm or another online site at which you can complete this survey. 3. Post a response to the discussion question (below) and respond to one other student by DATE, 11:59 pm (Voicethread) 4. Read chapters 9 & 10 in Heacox Book 5. Complete: (How do our Current Practices Align with the Essential Elements of RTI Phase 2) and put it in the Drop-Box by DATE. How do our Current Practices Align with the Essential Elements of RTI Phase 2. Find document on D2L under Assignments. Students are to examine their school s current reality, desired outcomes, and short-term goals. A few of the elements evaluated are: instructional standards that are research based, universally screening of all students, progress monitoring, and communication efforts with parents. (1a, 1b, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2b, 3c, 3d, 4a, 4c, 5c, 5e) 6. Students will do one of the following: 7. Create a word Web site review. Students should find a reputable site that deals with student diversity as related to philosophy of education, learning preferences, multiple intelligences, or demographic information. This should be completed consistent with the examples on D2L under content. 8. Create a PowerPoint of no more than 10 slides that focuses on diversity as related to philosophy of education, learning preferences, multiple intelligences or demographic information relevant to these topics 9. Write a poem or song that deals with diversity as related to philosophy of education, learning preferences, multiple intelligences or demographic information relevant to these topics 10. Draw and scan in a picture that illustrates diversity as related to philosophy of education, learning preferences, multiple intelligences or demographic information relevant to these topics The project of your choice must be uploaded to the drop box by 11:59 pm on Date. (1a, 1b, 2c, 3a, 3d, 4b, 4c)
9 Week 5 Discussion Question Please summarize the interpretation of your score from the Modality Preferences Survey and the Multiple Intelligences Survey for Adults. Were you surprised by your scores? Please note whether you see these preferences influencing your performance as a teacher or other educational professional. (4a, 4c, 5a) Week 6 1. Download Week 6 Lecture Notes 2. Complete: (RTI Self-Report Needs Assessment Phase 3) and put it in the Drop-Box by Date. RTI Self-Report Needs Assessment Phase 3. For this assignment students are asked to rate their general understanding of RTI in content areas, knowledge of universal screening and progress monitoring, interventions to facilitate student progress. Students are also to identify instructional modifications that would assist struggling students, modify their own instruction, and which RTI areas should be planned for present/future professional development. (1a, 1b, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2b, 3c, 3d, 4a, 4c, 5a, 5c, 5e) 3. Continue reading the Heacox text on Differentiated Instruction. 4. Individual (or group) discussion (via WebEx) on progress made on Differentiated Lesson Plan 5. Write a Reflection Paper (or Present.me) to the following question Please summarize, in your estimation, the most important points related to differentiated instruction in the Heacox book. In addition, compare and contrast similarities and/or differences between major points of the Heacox book and the Tomlinson presentations. (2 page minimum) (1a, 1b, 1c, 1f, 2a, 2c, 3b, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5a) 6. Take Differentiated Instruction Quiz 7. From your previous literature review, what (if anything) will you use to inform your teaching? In other words, from your research, what do you plan to do differently to address your initial problem/concern? Share your point of view with the instructor in a no less than 2 page summary by DATE in the appropriate Drop-Box. (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2a, 2c, 3a, 3b, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5c) Week 7 Week 8 1. Prepare a Differentiated Lesson Plan that spans at least one week. (SEE DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THIS ASSIGNMENT AT THE END OF THE SYLLABUS). This plan should contain evidence of differentiated instruction and the use of Bloom s Taxonomy. The lesson plan can be at any grade or subject level. The plan should contain outcomes, timeframes, assessments, and differentiated instructional strategies employed. Consult examples under content on D2L. Upload lesson plan to D2L drop box by DATE. (1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f, 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3d, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5e) 1. Download Week 8 Lecture Notes 2. Take Final Exam under Quizzes on D2L by 11:59 pm by DATE. 2. Complete Course Evaluation by 11:59 pm on DATE.
10 Reasoned Action Leadership In the Reasoned Action leadership model, the research on and our knowledge of the activities and principles of teaching surround all other components of the school leadership process. This portion of the knowledge base then serves as a conceptual framework for those aspects of education, which deal most specifically with school leadership. In this manner with the principles of teaching encompassing the principles of administration the interdependence of teachers and administrators is given recognition and reinforcement. The Performance Nucleus Inside the conceptual frame, a performance nucleus exists which is best described as an input output leadership performance scheme. It represents a development process, which begins with the curricular organization of the Tri-College University educational administration program. In the Reasoned Action Leadership model, the curriculum is organized into five broad areas or curricular building blocks (I Personal and Professional Development; II Instructional Leadership; III Organizational Leadership; IV Political and Community Leadership; V Role Specialization. Education 632/732 is a part of Block II. The instruction planned is intended to affect students and to be affected by students. In-class experiences are planned which (a) assist students in becoming more aware of their own personal nature, talents, and abilities, and (b) allow for a professor-to-student and student-to-student developmental influence of personal, valueorientated characteristics. Acceptable academic performance in this course and positive participation in the planned activities, coupled with possession of necessary idiographic characteristics, should facilitate acceptable reasoned action. It is intended that the combined impact of the encompassing conceptual frame and the leadership performance nucleus of the model employed in this course is such that outputs the leadership behaviors of educators are consistent with the current research and knowledge of the field as well as with the program faculty s beliefs about the essential character and performance requirements for school leaders as they develop effective schools. Purpose of Related Courses Related courses such as Education 635; Personnel, Supervision, and Staff Development, Education 642; Elementary School Curriculum, Education 643; Secondary School Curriculum, and Education 680; Instructional Models afford students the opportunity to expand their knowledge of and skills for curriculum development and assessment. Professional Ethics Work in this course must be completed in a manner consistent with the MSUM Student Handbook policy on Academic Honesty, P-13. Special Information A student with a disability or other special needs and who requires special accommodations for success in this course is invited to share those concerns or requests with the instructor as soon as possible. Students with disabilities who believe they may need an accommodation in this class are encouraged to contact Greg Toutges, Coordinator of Disability Services at (Voice) or (MRS/TTY), CMU 114 as soon as possible to ensure that accommodations are implemented in a timely fashion. Student projects, tests, etc. will be kept on file for 60 days following the last class period. All student work not picked up during the 60 day period will be discarded. Course Format and Organization
11 This course will be delivered asynchronous (completely on-line) Main Course Requirements Major course requirements include readings, independent and cooperative learning projects, and a final exam. Evaluation Students progress in the course will be evaluated by a mix of formal and informal assessment techniques, including the following: (a) quizzes/exams (b) discussion participation (c) assigned projects (d) final exam (essay format) Instructional strategies Instructional strategies for this course include readings, lectures, online discussion, exploration of online resources, field observation, interviews, creative projects, and cooperative learning. Final grade Your grade for the course will be calculated on the basis of the total points you have accumulated as a percentage of possible points: % A C A C B D B D B D C or below F Conceptual Framework: Minnesota State University Moorhead candidates are becoming professionals who are knowledgeable, reflective, humanistic, and creative. Knowledgeable: MSUM candidates display competence in their subject matter, built upon a strong grounding in liberal studies. MSUM candidates understand the principles of learning, assessment and technology. They understand and apply legal and ethical considerations to all aspects of their work. MSUM candidates are able to integrate theory and practice, and view learning as an active process. MSUM candidates demonstrate the ability to model connections between philosophical foundations and best practices in the field. As life-long learners, MSUM candidates engage in research and complex thinking. They design opportunities for others to seek knowledge and to understand themselves as members of the world community. Reflective: MSUM candidates engage in thoughtful analysis of the meaning and significance of their actions, decisions, and results with regard to their work in order to assess progress in meeting this guiding principle. It is through this reflective process that candidates improve instruction, implement new ideas, abandon ineffective methodologies, and enhance learning outcomes for their students. MSUM candidates are skilled at analyzing their teaching from a variety of perspectives and identifying connections between teaching strategies and student learning. In addition, candidates utilize a variety of techniques to question their procedures and consider alternatives for instruction and student growth. MSUM candidates recognize learning, motivational, and
12 developmental variables and relate those dimensions to their teaching practices. Finally, MSUM candidates bring a questioning spirit to received wisdom and conventional practice when needed. Humanistic: MSUM candidates value the personal worth of each individual. This is based on a belief in people's potential and innate ability to develop to their fullest. MSUM candidates' actions are grounded in knowledge of different cultural and ethnic groups within the world community, and in knowledge of the influence of culture and history, ethnicity, language, gender and socio-economics on one's life. This knowledge base informs candidates' decision-making as they create environments that promote freedom, compassion, and success for all learners. MSUM candidates are fair-minded in their interactions with others, as well as sensitive to and accepting of individual differences. Further, MSUM candidates have an understanding of aesthetics and the diversity that is part of the human experience and will incorporate this knowledge into their work. MSUM candidates recognize and accommodate a variety of linguistic and nonlinguistic interpersonal skills in their actions with others MSUM candidates foster resiliency in the students with whom they work and model these qualities in their own work. Creative: MSUM candidates understand the powerful resources of the arts and sciences and use their knowledge of these areas to bring the best of their imaginative and creative acts into the classroom. MSUM candidates recognize the important role creativity plays in the design of instruction and classroom environment. They will, for themselves and for their students, meet new situations with resourcefulness, excitement and curiosity, with an investigative attitude, and with the ability to pose, seek and design solutions to problems. MSUM candidates are cognizant of the aesthetic elements of the world and draw on that knowledge to make curricular decisions designed to help students not only learn about aesthetics, but to also learn how to think about the world at large. Signature Assignment Differentiated Five-Day Learning Segment In this assignment you will develop a five-day learning segment that you will teach in your classroom. Successful completion of this assignment will demonstrate that you have the abilities to: develop knowledge of subject matter, content standards, and subject-specific pedagogy (UNDERSTANDING OF PEDAGOCIAL CONTENT) develop and apply knowledge of varied student needs (UNDERSTANDING OF THEORIES OF PEDAGOGY AND LEARNING) consider research and theory about how students learn (UNDERSTANDING OF THEORIES OF PEDAGOGY AND LEARNING) reflect on and analyze evidence of the effects of instruction on learning (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Steps to developing the learning segment and reflection: Provide a context for teaching your learning segment (i.e., information about the school where you are teaching; special features of the school you are teaching; any district, school, or cooperating teacher requirements or expectations that might affect your planning or delivery of instruction, such as required curricula, pacing plan, use of specific instructional strategies, or standardized tests; time devoted each day for the lessons, textbook or instructional program primarily used; other resources (e.g., electronic whiteboard, classroom library or other text sets, on-line professional resources) you use; grade level; number of students in the class; variety of students in the class (English Language Learners, gifted students, students with IEPs, underperforming students) Write a plan for each lesson in your learning segment your lesson plans should be detailed enough that a substitute teacher could teach the lesson Lesson plan should include:
13 State-adopted student academic content standards and/or Common Core State Standards that are the target of student learning (List the number and text of each standard that is being addressed in each lesson. If only a portion of a standard is being addressed, then only list the part or parts that are relevant.) Learning objectives associated with the content standards Informal and formal assessments used to monitor student learning, including type(s) of assessment and what is being assessed (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Instructional strategies and learning tasks (including what you and the students will be doing) that support diverse student needs (reference to evidence-based strategies) (INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES) Instructional resources and materials used to engage students in learning (INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES) Submit copies of all written assessments. (Submit only the blank assessments given to students) (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) After developing the lesson plans, write a reflection that: Describes the central focus and purpose for the content you will teach in the learning segment. Explain how your plans build on each other to help students make connections. Knowledge of your students to inform teaching-- What do students know, what can they do, and what are they learning to do? Personal/cultural/community assets related to the central focus What do you know about your students everyday experiences, cultural backgrounds and practices and interests? Describe and justify why your instructional strategies and planned supports are appropriate for the whole class, individuals, and/or groups of students with specific learning needs. (Consider students with IEPs, English language learners, struggling readers, underperforming students or those with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or gifted students.) (UNDERSTANDING OF PEDAGOCIAL CONTENT) Identify how the instructional strategies are supported by learning theory. (UNDERSTANDING OF THEORIES OF PEDAGOGY AND LEARNING) Describe how your planned formal and informal assessments will provide direct evidence that students have developed the learning objective. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Explain how the design or adaptation of your planned assessments allows students with specific needs to demonstrate their learning. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Describe the assessment you used to develop the students developing knowledge and identify the evaluation criteria that was used to analyze student learning. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Collect and analyze student work from the selected assessment to identify quantitative and qualitative patterns of learning within, and across learners in, the class. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Select 3 student work samples that represent the patterns of learning (i.e., what individuals or groups generally understood and what a number of students were still struggling to understand) you identified in your assessment analysis. These students will be your focus students for the remainder of this reflection, a student with an IEP (Individualized Education Program), an English language learner, a struggling reader or writer, an underperforming student or a student with gaps in academic knowledge, and/or a gifted student needing greater support or challenge. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Document the feedback you gave to each of the 3 focus students. (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING) Based on your analysis of student learning describe next steps for instruction for the whole class for the 3 focus students and other individuals/groups with specific needs (here you would submit the completed work samples with feedback documented) (ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES)
14 Explain how the next steps that follow from your analysis of student learning. Support your explanation with principles from research and/or theory. (UNDERSTANDING OF THEORIES OF PEDAGOGY AND LEARNING)
ED 632 Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning Theory. 4 credits
Course Description ED 632 Curriculum, Instruction, and Learning Theory 4 credits Education 632 provides school leaders with the ability to understand major curriculum design models, interpret school district
Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Core Alignment of Summative Assessments to Standards
Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Core Alignment of Summative Assessments to Standards Standards ED 601 Summative Assignment 1 NBPTS Proposition 1: Teachers are Committed to Students and Learning
Supervised Student Teaching Experience for All Education Majors
Supervised Student Teaching Experience for All Education Majors Additional requirements may be expected in each individual education program. Please see your University Supervisor for more information.
Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership
Standards for Advanced Programs in Educational Leadership for Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors NATIONAL POLICY BOARD FOR EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION Published January,
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards
Colorado Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate knowledge of the content they teach a. Teachers provide instruction that is aligned with the Colorado Academic Standards and their
K - 12 Principal & Superintendent
BOSA COMPETENCY MATRIX Minnesota Administrative Licensure K - 12 Principal & Superintendent WINONA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP Name: Place of Employment Mailing
TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES
Get to Know My RE Observe Collect Evidence Mentor Moments Reflect Review Respond Tailor Support Provide Provide specific feedback specific Feedback What does my RE need? Practice Habits Of Mind Share Data
Standards for Educational Leaders (Principals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors)
Standards for Educational Leaders (rincipals, Superintendents, Curriculum Directors, and Supervisors) Introduction These Standards and Indicators were adapted from the Educational Leadership Constituencies
CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)
CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE) The Teaching Performance Expectations describe the set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that California expects of each candidate for a Multiple
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS
GEORGIA STANDARDS FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION UNITS AND EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Effective 9/01/08) Kelly Henson Executive Secretary Table of Contents Standard 1: Candidate Knowledge,
Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession
12 Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession 1 Teachers understand student learning and development and respect the diversity of the students they teach. Teachers display knowledge of how
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND FOUNDATIONS
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND FOUNDATIONS EDAD 5312: Instructional Leadership Competency Area: Instructional Leadership Course Syllabus Departmental Mission Statement
North Carolina TEACHER. evaluation process. Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction
North Carolina TEACHER evaluation process Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers ( This form should be
Educational Leadership Advising Handbook: Addendum to the Graduate Handbook
Educational Leadership Advising Handbook: Addendum to the Graduate Handbook Educational Leadership Program Overview The program consists of ten (10) courses for thirty (30) credit hours. It is a licensure
Arkansas Teaching Standards
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors
St. Joseph s College Education Department Handbook for Student Teachers Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors Brooklyn Campus Long Island Campus 245 Clinton Avenue 155 West Roe Boulevard Brooklyn, NY
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University
Revisioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina Master of Arts in Elementary Education Appalachian State University A. A description of how the proposed program has been revisioned to reflect
Visual Arts. Assessment Handbook. September 2013. edtpa_visarts_02
Visual Arts Assessment Handbook September 2013 edtpa_visarts_02 edtpa stems from a twenty-five-year history of developing performance-based assessments of teaching quality and effectiveness. The Teacher
MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS
MILLIKIN TEACHING STANDARDS Millikin Teaching Standards are correlated to and modifications of Illinois Professional Teaching Standards. Modifications reflect Millikin s mission and the education unit
School Psychology Program Goals, Objectives, & Competencies
RUTGERS SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM PRACTICUM HANDBOOK Introduction School Psychology is a general practice and health service provider specialty of professional psychology that is concerned with the science
Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Principal Endorsement Program Course Sequence and Descriptions
Master of Arts in Educational Administration, Principal Endorsement Program Course Sequence and Descriptions EDU 615 Principal as School Leader (3 credit hours) In this course, candidates will develop
Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
Signature Assign 3. Course Grade. Course Grade. Research. Course Grade. Research. Project, ED 613. Political Concepts. Course Grade.
Alignment of Curriculum & Instruction Master s Degree Program with National Standards and MSUM Conceptual Framework National Board of Teaching Standards Proposition 1: Teachers are Committed to Students
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders
Alabama Standards for Instructional Leaders To realize the mission of enhancing school leadership among principals and administrators in Alabama resulting in improved academic achievement for all students,
Library Information Specialist [27.450]
Library Information Specialist [27.450] STANDARD 1 Information Access and Delivery The library information specialist provides equitable intellectual and physical access to information and ideas in support
Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals
Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals 1 Principals help create a shared vision and clear goals for their schools and ensure continuous progress toward achieving the goals. Principals lead the process
NC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO Part I Purpose Principles to Be Addressed Required Documentation Directions Entry 1: Analyzing the School Counseling Environment Candidates analyze the school counseling environment
ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013)
ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (2013) Standard 1 - Teaching Diverse Students The competent teacher understands the diverse characteristics and abilities of each student and how individuals develop
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Speech- Language Pathologists STANDARD 1: School speech-language pathologists demonstrate leadership, advocacy, collaboration, and ethical practices. School Speech-Language
RtI Response to Intervention
DRAFT RtI Response to Intervention A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success Guide Document TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Four Essential Components of RtI... 2 Component 1... 3 Component 2...
WA TPA. Secondary English- Language Arts. Assessment. Handbook. Teacher Performance. Consortium (TPAC) Field Test Pre-Release Handbook September 2011
WA Teacher Performance Assessment Consortium (TPAC) WA TPA Secondary English- Language Arts Assessment Handbook September 2011 September 2011 WA The Teacher Performance Assessment stems from a 25-year
UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience
UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience The culminating experience for the Masters of Education degree with
FINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase. Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date. Certification area: Special Education. Field Supervisor:
MOLLOY COLLEGE Division of Education SPECIAL EDUCATION FINAL EVALUATION Professional Phase Teacher Candidate s Name: ID# Date Certification area: Special Education Field Supervisor: Clinical Faculty [Cooperating
EFRT 305 Human Development and Learning
EFRT 305 Human Development and Learning Required Textbooks: Slavin, Robert E., (2010). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 9 th Ed. ISBN: 9780137034352 EMSP Registration: This course has a field
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK September 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department This test design and framework document
(Advanced Preparation)
1 NCTM CAEP Standards (2012) Elementary Mathematics Specialist (Advanced Preparation) Standard 1: Content Knowledge Effective elementary mathematics specialists demonstrate and apply knowledge of major
School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION. MAED: Reading & Reading Programs
School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION : Reading & Reading Programs 2012-2014 READING PROGRAMS These programs focus on developmental and remedial instruction of literacy as well as leadership
ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers
ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Revised ADEPT Performance Standards for Classroom-Based Teachers Introduction Central to the ADEPT system is a set of expectations for what teaching
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Counseling
1 Fall, 2013 COUN 539 School Counseling (Online) Joyce P. Finch, Ed.D. [email protected] or [email protected] Office: 713-313-7625 Cell: 281-731-2099 Office: 307 A TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards
North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards Every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life
Framework and Guidelines for Principal Preparation Programs
THE FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPAL PREPARATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1 Purpose Of all the educational research conducted over the last 30 years in the search to improve student
SECTION 4: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE
SECTION 4: MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE Beginning with the summer session in 1954, a fi fth-year program of teacher education leading to the degree Master of Teaching was instituted at Northwestern Oklahoma
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators Standard 1: Instructional Technology Facilitators demonstrate leadership. Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished
CTL Online Workshop Program Referral Resource Sheet
ACADEMIC POLICIES THAT CAN AFFECT YOU AS A UMUC FACULTY MEMBER Familiarizes faculty with UMUC Academic Policies and their effect on faculty responsibilities and expectations for students Intended for all
Standards of Quality and Effectiveness for Professional Teacher Preparation Programs APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A Teaching Performance Expectations A. MAKING SUBJECT MATTER COMPREHENSIBLE TO STUDENTS TPE 1: Specific Pedagogical Skills for Subject Matter Instruction Background Information: TPE 1. TPE 1 is
MGMT 361 (Hybrid) Human Resource Management
Columbia College Online Campus P a g e 1 MGMT 361 (Hybrid) Human Resource Management Summer Session 14/15 June 1 July 25, 2015 Course Description This course provides a thorough understanding of design,
ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM
ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM FIELD 188: ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL TEACHING (PK 12) June 2011 ILLINOIS CERTIFICATION TESTING SYSTEM FIELD 188: ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL TEACHING (PK 12) June
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE
FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE S The Framework of Supports are a set of Practice Profiles that serve as an implementation overview of Support for Personalized Learning (SPL). Practice
The School Leadership Collaborative Intern and Administrative Mentor Guide
Gonzaga University School of Education The School Leadership Collaborative Intern and Administrative Mentor Guide Principal Certification Program Administrator Certification Department of Educational Leadership
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the
Crosswalk of the New Colorado Principal Standards (proposed by State Council on Educator Effectiveness) with the Equivalent in the Performance Based Principal Licensure Standards (current principal standards)
Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition
VOLUME 31, NUMBER 4, 2013 Leadership and Learning: The Journey to National Accreditation and Recognition Lisa Bertrand, EdD Professor and Program Coordinator Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling
Pre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language
. EDAM EDAM-5001. EARLY LITERACY: GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT This course is the prerequisite for all other courses in the Early Childhood Literacy program. It outlines the philosophical
Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the New York State Teacher Certification Examinations
Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the New York State Teacher Certification Examinations Introduction The New York State Education Department requires that prospective
Section 2: Program Summary Economics (CA): Secondary Major and Minor
Section 2: Program Summary Economics (CA): Secondary Major and Minor The University Detroit Mercy (UDM), a Catholic institution whose mission flows from the educational traditions of the Sisters of Mercy
Principal Practice Observation Tool
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
EDU 330: Developmental and Educational Psychology Course Syllabus Spring 2015
EDU 330: Developmental and Educational Psychology Course Syllabus Spring 2015 Professor: Dr. Daniel C. Moos Office: (507) 933-7448 Email: [email protected] Class: Tuesday & Thursday (Mattson, 102) 9:00
BOK Course Title Course Description Access to Children
ECE Online Courses Course Number BOK Course Title Course Description Access to Children 18CI1001 TI Educational Technology This course encompasses effectively analyzing, designing, Must videotape a developing,
CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)
Education Code section 44270.5 allows an examination alternative to the Administrative Services preparation program as long as the examination is aligned with the current Administrative Services Program
Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders
Dispositions, Dimensions, and Functions for School Leaders Preparation and Support for the Next Generation of Kentucky s School and District Leaders Kentucky Cohesive Leadership System Continuum for Principal
School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING. Master of Arts in Teaching
School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING Master of Arts in Teaching 2012-2014 The Master of Arts in Teaching Program The Master of Arts in Teaching program is designed for: 1. A person with an appropriate
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE TEACHERS COLLEGE. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: ED334 Spring, 2011 Three Hours
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY THE TEACHERS COLLEGE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: ED334 Spring, 2011 Three Hours Instructor: Steve Neill, Associate Professor Office: Visser Hall 203B Address: Box 4037 Emporia, Kansas
CLASS MEETING TIME/LOCATION:
QATAR UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION EDEC 410: Play and the Theory of Movement (2CRS) SEMESTER AND YEAR INSTRUCTOR: OFFICE NUMBER: PHONE: EMAIL: OFFICE HOURS: CLASS MEETING TIME/LOCATION: COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
SYLLABUS. Text Books/Additional Readings Course requirements will be aligned with readings from 6340. No additional readings will be planned.
Southern Methodist University Annette Caldwell Simmons School of Education and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning EDU 6141: SYLLABUS Instructor: Caroline I. Kethley, Ph.D. Location:
Novice Experienced Expert a. Understands the importance of ABE, ASE, and ESOL at the personal and program level. X X X
Complete Draft 1 through 5 Rhode Island Adult Education Practitioner Standards for Instructors 9-12-12 Definitions: Expert Teachers Expert teachers have the capacity to teach from the heart as well as
STL 330 Child Development and Learning for Teachers
Instructor: Email: Phone: Office: Office hours: STL 330 Child Development and Learning for Teachers Course Description: This course explores the growth, development and learning of children from conception
NExT Common Metrics TTS Last updated January 27, 2014
2014 Transition to Teaching Survey Which communication method most prompted you to complete this survey today? (Select one only.) Email message(s) from Hezel Associates Mailed letter from Hezel Associates
MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL
TEACHER & LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL Prepared by Learning Sciences Marzano Center Center for Teacher and Leadership Evaluation April 2012 1 TEACHER & LEADERSHIP EVALUATION
Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals
Possible Guiding Questions Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrators and Principals This document utilizes the components within the Framework for Leadership to provide possible guiding
North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards
North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards Every public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work and postsecondary education and prepared for life in
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards For every student in North Carolina, a knowledgeable, skilled compassionate teacher...a star in every classroom. As Approved by the State Board of Education
Masters of Reading Information Booklet. College of Education
Masters of Reading Information Booklet College of Education Department of Teaching and Learning Bloomsburg University's Masters in Reading/Reading Certification degree program provides theoretical, analytical
EA 597 School Planning and Facilities Management (3)
EA 581 Basic Concepts of Educational Administration (3) An introduction to the basic concepts underlying school building administration. The theory and practice of educational administration is analyzed
u Field Experience Handbook for Supervising Library Media Teacher or Teacher Librarian
u Field Experience Handbook for Supervising Library Media Teacher or Teacher Librarian Revised 2010 Dear Supervising Teacher Librarian: Thank you for your willingness to have a student perform fieldwork
Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)
Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6) The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English Language Arts and Mathematics as well as the soon-to-be released Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) require
Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014)
1 Educational Leadership & Policy Studies Masters Comprehensive Exam and Rubric (Rev. July 17, 2014) The comprehensive exam is intended as a final assessment of a student s ability to integrate important
Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [26.110-26.270]
I.B. SPECIFIC TEACHING FIELDS Standards for Certification in Early Childhood Education [26.110-26.270] STANDARD 1 Curriculum The competent early childhood teacher understands and demonstrates the central
ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching
ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching Course: ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Credit: 9 Semester Credit Hours (Undergraduate),
Curriculum and Instruction
Curriculum and Instruction Core curriculum is the foundation of Tier 1 instruction and is the basis for building K-12 literacy in Arizona students. The curriculum at each level must be based upon the 2010
Sample Teacher Interview Questions
Sample Teacher Interview Questions Getting to Know You Tell us about yourself. What would you like us to know about you? If you had a co-teaching experience while student teaching, tell us about it and
Standards for Professional Development
Standards for Professional Development APRIL 2015 Ohio Standards for Professional Development April 2015 Page 1 Introduction All of Ohio s educators and parents share the same goal that Ohio s students
Candidates will demonstrate ethical attitudes and behaviors.
EDET 628 Apply instructional design principles to create a unit of instruction which integrates technology and enhances student understanding Demonstrate purposeful alignment of state competencies and
AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning
21ST CENTURY TEACHING AND LEARNING 21st Century Teaching and Learning Dr. Grace Surdovel, Director of Master's Programs/Faculty of Practice The Master of Science in Education with a major in 21st Century
Transition to Teaching Survey Mean Scores by Item and by Performance Area
Spring 2014 Transition Teaching Survey Mean Scores by and by Performance Area N=42 (36% return rate) Part A: Mark a response 1 4 indicate your agreement with each statement. If you do not have enough information
THE MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND THE PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
THE MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND THE PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Student Handbook Lincoln University Graduate Education Program 3020 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19104
Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA)
Program Report for the Preparation of Reading Education Professionals International Reading Association (IRA) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCATION 1: COVER SHEET 1. Institution Name
Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics
Albemarle County Schools Teacher Performance Appraisal (TPA) Rubrics The Teacher Performance Appraisal includes performance rubrics designed to guide self-assessment and reflection based on professional
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON College of Education Department of Special Education Sped 520: Assessment in Special Education Spring 2015
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON College of Education Department of Special Education Sped 520: Assessment in Special Education Spring 2015 Location: CP125 Day and Time: Tuesday 9-11:45; Thursday
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Revised for 2014 2015 State Guidelines for ESEA Waiver & SB 290 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 255 Capitol St, NE, Salem, OR
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric
2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric Exclusive partners with Dr. Robert J. Marzano for the Teacher Evaluation Model and School Leader Evaluation Model Learning Sciences International 175
Required Field and Clinical Experiences Across Initial and Advanced Programs Class B Early Childhood and Elementary Education
Field and Experiences Across Initial and Advanced Programs Class B Early and Course ECY 300 EDF 362 EDR 440 Survey of Special Foundations of I Reading I Designed to provide an overview of exceptionality
Additional Qualification Course Guideline Special Education, Specialist
Additional Qualification Course Guideline Special Education, Specialist Schedule D Teachers Qualifications Regulation April 2014 Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre Ligne directrice du
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework
Elementary MEd I. The Relationship of the Program with the Unit s Conceptual Framework Shaping Tomorrow: Ideas to Action The Early Elementary Education program for prospective elementary education candidates
Management Fundamentals in Healthcare Organizations
Management Fundamentals in Healthcare Organizations University of Minnesota School of Public Health LEARNING MODEL The learning model underlying the Management Fundamentals Certificate is an application
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals Education leaders ensure the achievement of all students by guiding the development and implementation
CEC Special Education Specialist Advanced Preparation Standards 1
Page 1 of 8 CEC Special Education Specialist Advanced Preparation Standards 1 Among the sine qua non characteristics of mature professions are the identification of the specialized knowledge and skill
Delta Courses. *The College Classroom. The College Classroom: International Students, International Faculty. Diversity in the College Classroom
COURSE CATALOG Contents Introduction... 3 Delta Courses... 4 The College Classroom... 4 The College Classroom: International Students, International Faculty... 4 Diversity in the College Classroom... 4
*Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators
C o m m o n C o r e o f L e a d i n g : Connecticut School Leadership Standards *Performance Expectations, Elements and Indicators *For further information, visit: http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/cwp/view.asp?a=2641&q=333900
