Corporate Leadership Council Metrics
|
|
|
- Liliana Farmer
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 for the Corporate Leadership Council Metrics Contact Point Chris Cejka Director, Strategic Planning and Evaluation Division Human Capital Innovation Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer Department of Homeland Security (202) Reviewing Official Maureen Cooney Acting Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (571)
2 Page 2 Introduction The Department of Homeland Security established the Human Resource Management System (HRMS) Program to implement the human capital provisions of the Homeland Security Act of HRMS is a collection of functions and systems centered on a core enterprise Human Resource Management System (HRMS). HRMS is part of a broader One DHS model where a collection of disparate and redundant systems across DHS are consolidated into enterprise-wide solutions. DHS has a strategic imperative to evaluate the implementation of HRMS with a baseline measure completed by September 1, This evaluation will be accomplished with the assistance of a webaccessible Human Capital Dashboard, an analytical tool made available to DHS by the Corporate Leadership Council (CLC). CLC s services include hosting the computer server on which will reside proprietary CLC analytic software and data sets provided by DHS. When CLC s software is applied to the DHS data sets, the result is a graphic depiction of key indicators of DHS performance in the human capital area. CLC s software also provides multiple analytical tools capable of enabling DHS managers to explore data for more precise explanations of performance. CLC maintains the server in a secure facility and control access to the server and the data. Key Goals CLC provides similar services to other federal agencies, including the Department of Justice. The Human Capital Dashboard will reflect data extracted from the Human Resource Information System (HRIS) in conjunction with the National Finance Center (NFC). CLC will perform analyses on associated human capital metrics to reflect the state of DHS human resources programs and, by extension, the HRMS program. Points-of-Contact Chris Cejka, Director of Human Capital Strategic Planning and Evaluation [email protected], (202) Michelle Gilder, Human Capital Business Systems Analyst [email protected], (202) Reviewing Officer Maureen Cooney, Acting Chief Privacy Officer (571)
3 Page 3 SECTION 1 QUESTIONS ABOUT THE DATA AND ITS PURPOSES: 1.1 What information is to be collected? The Corporate Leadership Council (CLC) will collect data extracts from the National Finance Center (NFC) personnel system relating to employee demographics, employment status, salaries, and organizational information. DHS will determine which specific data elements are required for analysis. The elements to be collected are derived from nature of action code data rather than from each individual s record, e.g. promotion, retirement, incentive pay, performance appraisal rating. The elements to be collected do not include names, social security number, geographic location, or any other field that would allow an individual employee to be identified. All data are aggregated prior to presentation on the dashboard. It is not possible to identify individuals with the data used. Please see the attached CLC Extract Data Fields table for the complete list of data fields. 1.2 Why is the information being collected? Is it relevant and necessary to the purpose for which the system is being designed? The purpose of collecting these data is to assess the overall characteristics and performance of DHS human resources programs and HRMS. 1.3 What is the intended use of the information? The intended use of the information is to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of DHS human resources programs and HRMS. These organizational-level performance assessments will allow DHS to develop strategies for attaining department objectives for human resource programs. 1.4 What are the sources of the information in the system? Where and how are you acquiring the information? The only source of information that will be fed into the Human Capital Dashboard is the NFC system. There will be no permanent electronic bridge or inter-system interface between DHS and CLC. Information is transferred through CD format at least once a year if not quarterly. In a secure environment, DHS extracts the data from NFC via FOCUS reports. The extract is imported into a Microsoft Access database where DHS creates queries to export non-sensitive data into a spreadsheet that is saved on a secure CD. The secure CD is passed onto CLC through coordination from the Human Capital Strategic Planning and Evaluation group. CLC creates the dashboard from the spreadsheet that contains non-sensitive data.
4 Page How will the information be checked for accuracy? Once the CD that is provided to CLC is produced, it is up to date by virtue of it being the most recent information available to DHS. CLC will submit the data to a stringent verification process that includes descriptive statistical analyses (i.e., ranges, frequency distributions). This will ensure that erroneous data are identified and deleted or corrected. DHS will approve the results of the verification process, ensuring that data collected and reported upon is accurate. 1.6 Will the system derive new data or create previously unavailable data about an individual through aggregation from the information collected? No, the system will not create new data about an individual. DHS will make performance assessments by grouping existing data fields to reflect aggregated information and statistical insights on HR programs, e.g., how many new hires occurred during a certain period of time. 1.7 Will the newly derived data be placed on the individual s record? No new data will be placed on the individual s record. 1.8 Can the system make new determinations about an individual that would not be possible without the new data? No. The system will allow DHS to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of human resource management. 1.9 How will the newly derived data be verified for relevance and accuracy? Not applicable Are the data elements described in detail and documented? If yes, what is the name of the document? The data elements are consistent with those described in the OPM s Central Personnel Data File (CPDF), OPM s Guide to Personnel Data Standards, and NFC records. They also are described in detail in the CLC Data Extract Template (copy attached). This template is a list of 57 field names, less than half of which are required elements for the DHS dashboard. DHS may provide optional data elements as deemed necessary.
5 Page 5 SECTION 2 QUESTIONS ABOUT REDRESS: 2.1 What opportunities do individuals have to decline to provide information? Because information capable of identifying an individual is not used, this question is not applicable. 2.2 What opportunities do individuals have to consent to particular uses of the information? Not applicable. Individual data will not be reflected on the human capital dashboard. 2.3 How do individuals grant consent concerning how their information will be used or shared? Not applicable. Individual data will not be reflected on the human capital dashboard. 2.4 What are the procedures for individuals to gain access to their own information? Not applicable. Individual data will not be reflected on the human capital dashboard. 2.5 What are the procedures for correcting erroneous information? Not applicable. Individual data will not be reflected on the human capital dashboard.
6 Page 6 SECTION 3 QUESTIONS ABOUT ACCESS TO THE DATA: 3.1 Who will have access to the data in the system (Users, Managers, System Administrators, Developers, Others) and is it documented? DHS will develop a system access plan that will limit access to managers and analysts who have the responsibility of assessing the management of human resources. CLC and DHS will maintain documentation to track access. 3.2 How will access to the data by a user be determined? Access to the system will be determined by the DHS/CLC team through user and role maintenance. 3.3 Are criteria, procedures, controls, and responsibilities regarding access documented? Yes, CLC and DHS will maintain documentation to track access. The ability to grant access is controlled through role-based security. 3.4 Will users have role-based access to data on the system limiting them to some but not all of the data? Yes, role-based security will be applied to all users. 3.5 What controls are in place to prevent the misuse (e.g. browsing, expired privileges) of data by those having access? Access is controlled through role-based security. Accounts can be made active or inactive and accounts expire automatically if not used within a specific time period. 3.6 Do other systems share data or have access to data in this system? If yes, explain. Include a discussion of who will be responsible for protecting the privacy rights of individuals affected by the interface? No. No other systems share this data.
7 Page Will other agencies share data of have access to data in this system (International, Federal, State, Local, Other)? No. No other agencies will have access to the data in this system. Aggregated information on the dashboard may be viewed by CLC only in order to create benchmarks for comparison to other agencies, but DHS can only view its own information and other agencies cannot view DHS information. 3.8 How will the data be used by these other agencies? Not applicable. Data will not be used by other agencies Who is responsible for assuring proper use of the data by other agencies? Not applicable. Data will not be used by other agencies How will the system ensure that other agencies only get the information they are entitled to? Not applicable. Data will not be used by other agencies. SECTION 4 QUESTIONS ABOUT MAINTENANCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS: 4.1 Are the data secured consistent with agency requirements under the Federal Information Security Management Act? Specifically: a. Affirm that the agency is following IT security requirements and procedures required by federal law and policy to ensure that information is appropriately secured. DHS/CLC will follow all applicable security requirements and apply the necessary procedures required by federal law and policy to ensure that information remains secure.
8 Page 8 b. Acknowledge that the agency has conducted a risk assessment, identified appropriate security controls to protect against that risk, and implemented those controls. As part of all system planning, the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer (OCHCO) is using the Risk Management System (RMS) to generate C&A documentation. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has already awarded an Authorization to Operate for this system; therefore, DHS will generate an Interconnect System Agreement (ISA) with DOJ to satisfy the C&A requirement. c. Describe the monitoring/testing/evaluating on a regular basis to ensure that controls continue to work properly, safeguarding the information. Although there will be no electronic bridge between DHS and CLC, OCHCO will monitor, test, and evaluate the CLC system on an on-going basis to ensure that controls are sufficient. HRMS will conduct site visits to ensure compliance with NIST SP and requirements, additional site visits will include vulnerability and patch management verifications for compliance with CSIRC Alerts. Site Visits will cover areas such as (but not limited to) auditing, account management, records management, Configuration Management, firewall, and intrusion detection logs. d. Provide a point of contact for any additional questions from users. The DHS POC is Chris Cejka, [email protected], (202) Systems questions can be directed to John Allen, [email protected], (202) If the system is operated in more than one site, how will consistent use of the system and data be maintained in all sites? Not applicable. The system will be housed in one site. 4.3 What are the retention periods of data in the system? Data will be available for up to four years. 4.4 What are the procedures for expunging the data at the end of the retention period and are these procedures documented? CLC will expunge data after four years. CLC is familiar with data retention policies in the federal sector. Their clients include Department of Justice and General Accountability Office.
9 Page Will the system provide the capability to monitor individuals or groups of individuals? If yes, explain. No. While this tool has the capability of collecting and analyzing workforce metrics, the purpose of the Human Capital Dashboard is monitor the overall health of HR programs. OCHCO has no intention to monitor specific individuals. Data configuration will preclude monitoring at the individual level. 4.6 What controls are in place to prevent unauthorized monitoring of individuals or groups of individuals? Role-based access controls will be used to prevent unauthorized use of the CLC tool. 4.7 Under which Systems of Record Notice (SORN) does the system operate? Provide Number and Name. Design and construction of the DHS dashboard has only recently begun. Data elements need to be verified and the system has to be tested. The deployment schedule calls for the dashboard to be operational in September Currently a SORN is not planned because the CLC Metrics system will not collect or retrieve data based on personal identifiers. SECTION 5 DECISION ANALYSIS: 5.1 Did you evaluate competing technologies on their privacy handling capabilities? If yes, explain. The CLC metrics tool was selected based on its unique capabilities to portray workforce metrics, its proven track record in the human capital management area, and the Council s experience providing similar services to other federal agencies such as the Department of Justice and the General Accountability Office. 5.2 Were any choice changes made to system architectures, hardware, software, or implementation plans as a result of doing a PIA? If yes, explain. Yes. After completing this PIA and consulting with the Privacy Office, it was determined that rather than using full date of birth for evaluation purposes that the birth year was sufficient.
10 Page 10 Responsible Officials Chris Cejka, Director of Human Capital Strategic Planning and Evaluation (202) Michelle Gilder, Human Capital Business Systems Analyst (202) Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer
11 Page 11 Approval Signature Page Maureen Cooney Acting Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security
Reward TM System Privacy Impact Assessment
Reward TM System Privacy Impact Assessment February 11, 2005 Contact Point John Allen Human Capital Business Systems Department of Homeland Security (202) 357-8285 Reviewing Official Nuala O Connor Kelly
9/11 Heroes Stamp Act of 2001 File System
for the 9/11 Heroes Stamp Act of 2001 File System Contact Point Elizabeth Edge US Fire Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency (202) 646-3675 Reviewing Official Nuala O Connor Kelly Chief Privacy
Web Time & Attendance System
for the Web Time & Attendance System May 1, 2008 Contact Point Cheryl Mcelroy Human Capital Business Systems Department of Homeland Security 202-357-8285 Reviewing Official Hugo Teufel III Chief Privacy
NSF AuthentX Identity Management System (IDMS) Privacy Impact Assessment. Version: 1.1 Date: 12/04/2006. National Science Foundation
This document has been archived and replaced by piaauthentx1207..0 National Science Foundation NSF AuthentX Identity Management System (IDMS) Privacy Impact Assessment Version: 1.1 Date: 12/04/2006 Table
Student Administration and Scheduling System
for the Student Administration and Scheduling System DHS/FLETC/PIA-002 February 12, 2013 Contact Point William H. Dooley Chief, Office of IT Budget, Policy, & Plans (912) 261-4524 Reviewing Official Jonathan
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment Template
Department of the Interior Template May 28, 2014 Name of Project: Consolidated Financial System (CFS) Bureau: Office of the Secretary Project s Unique ID: 010-000000308 A. CONTACT INFORMATION: Teri Barnett
E-Mail Secure Gateway (EMSG)
for the E-Mail Secure Gateway (EMSG) DHS/MGMT/PIA-006 March 22, 2012 Contact Point David Jones MGMT/OCIO/ITSO/ESDO DHS HQ (202) 447-0167 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department
Stakeholder Engagement Initiative: Customer Relationship Management
for the Stakeholder Engagement Initiative: December 10, 2009 Contact Point Christine Campigotto Private Sector Office Policy 202-612-1623 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department
Privacy Impact Assessment
Technology, Planning, Architecture, & E-Government Version: 1.1 Date: April 14, 2011 Prepared for: USDA OCIO TPA&E Privacy Impact Assessment for the April 14, 2011 Contact Point Charles McClam Deputy Chief
United States Department of State Privacy Impact Assessment Risk Analysis and Management
United States Department of State Privacy Impact Assessment Risk Analysis and Management Bureau of Administration 1. Contact Information Risk Analysis and Management (RAM) PIA Department of State Privacy
Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) Merger
for the Information System (IFMIS) Merger DHS/FEMA/PIA-020 December 16, 2011 Contact Point Michael Thaggard Office of Chief Financial Officer (202) 212-8192 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Consular Affairs Enterprise Service Bus (CAESB) 01.00.00. Last Updated: May 1, 2015
United States Department of State (PIA) Consular Affairs Enterprise Service Bus (CAESB) 01.00.00 Last Updated: May 1, 2015 Bureau of Administration 1. Contact Information A/GIS/IPS Director Bureau of Administration
CASE MATTER MANAGEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM
for the CASE MATTER MANAGEMENT TRACKING SYSTEM September 25, 2009 Contact Point Mr. Donald A. Pedersen Commandant (CG-0948) (202) 372-3818 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the. Certification & Accreditation (C&A) Web (SBU)
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the Cyber Security Assessment and Management (CSAM) Certification & Accreditation (C&A) Web (SBU) Department of Justice Information Technology Security Staff (ITSS)
Office of Financial Research Constituent Relationship Management Tool Privacy Impact Assessment ( PIA ) April, 2015
Office of Financial Research Constituent Relationship Management Tool Privacy Impact Assessment ( PIA ) April, 2015 A. Identification System Name: OMB Unique Identifier: System Owner: Constituent Relationship
1. Contact Information. 2. System Information. Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
1. Contact Information Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Department of State Privacy Coordinator Margaret P. Grafeld Bureau of Administration Information Sharing Services Office of Information Programs and
Crew Member Self Defense Training (CMSDT) Program
for the Crew Member Self Defense Training (CMSDT) Program February 6, 2008 Contact Point Michael Rigney Federal Air Marshal Service Flight Programs Division [email protected] Reviewing Officials Peter
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Integrated Workplace Management System (IWMS) PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (IWMS) PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) March 21, 2013 General Information 1. Name of Project or System. (IWMS) 2. Describe the project and its purpose or function
Privacy Impact Assessment for the. E-Verify Self Check. March 4, 2011
for the E-Verify Self Check March 4, 2011 Contact Point Janice M. Jackson Privacy Branch, Verification Division United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 202-443-0109 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen
Department of Homeland Security Web Portals
for the Department of Homeland Security Web Portals June 15, 2009 Contact Point Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (703) 235-0780 Page 2 Abstract Many Department
1. Describe the information (data elements and fields) available in the system in the following categories:
Legal Authority(ies ): 44 USC 2108 Purpose of this System/ Application: The system is a large index used to identify, maintain and track open OPF files stored at the Federal Records Center in Lee's Summit,
Physical Access Control System
for the Physical Access Control System DHS/ALL 039 June 9, 2011 Contact Point David S. Coven Chief, Access Control Branch (202) 282-8742 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer (703)
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) June 22, 2007 Contact Point Harry Hopkins Office of Information Technology (OIT) (202) 272-8953 Reviewing Official Hugo Teufel III Chief
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment
Department of the Interior August 15, 2014 Name of Project: email Enterprise Records and Document Management System (eerdms) Bureau: Office of the Secretary Project s Unique ID: Not Applicable A. CONTACT
The Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Privacy Impact Assessment
The Bureau of the Fiscal Service Privacy Impact Assessment The mission of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) is to promote the financial integrity and operational efficiency of the federal
Privacy Impact Assessment. For. Non-GFE for Remote Access. Date: May 26, 2015. Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray michael.gray@ed.
For Non-GFE for Remote Access Date: May 26, 2015 Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray [email protected] System Owner: Allen Hill [email protected] Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
The Bureau of the Fiscal Service. Privacy Impact Assessment
The Bureau of the Fiscal Service Privacy Impact Assessment The mission of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) is to promote the financial integrity and operational efficiency of the federal
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Waiver Review System (WRS) Version 03.06.01.01. Last Updated: December 2, 2013
United States Department of State (PIA) Waiver Review System (WRS) Version 03.06.01.01 Last Updated: December 2, 2013 Bureau of Administration 1. Contact Information Department of State Privacy Coordinator
U.S. Department of the Interior PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
DI-4001 (01/2015) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT The Department of the Interior requires PIAs to be conducted and maintained on all IT systems
Web Time and Attendance
Privacy Impact Assessment for the Web Time and Attendance October 31, 2006 Contact Point Mr. Mark Danter Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Office of Management/ Financial Management Division
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment
Department of the Interior September 8, 2014 Name of Project: Enterprise Data-at Rest (DAR) Encryption Bureau: Office of the Secretary Project s Unique ID: 010-000000666 Once the PIA is completed and the
Privacy Impact Assessment for the Performance and Learning Management System (PALMS) DHS/ALL/PIA-049. January 23, 2015
for the Performance and Learning Management System (PALMS) January 23, 2015 Contact Point Anish Soni HRIT/CHCO/HCBS DHS HQ/Management Directorate (202) 357-8210 Reviewing Official Karen L. Neuman Chief
Online Detainee Locator System
for the Online Detainee Locator System April 9, 2010 Contact Point James Chaparro Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (202) 732-3100 Reviewing
Justice Management Division
Justice Management Division Privacy Impact Assessment for the Personal Identity Verification (PIV) Card System Issued by: Stuart Frisch, Senior Component Official for Privacy Reviewed by: Vance E. Hitch,
Privacy Impact Assessment. For Person Authentication Service (PAS) Date: January 9, 2015
For Person Authentication Service (PAS) Date: January 9, 2015 Point of Contact and Author: Hanan Abu Lebdeh [email protected] System Owner: Ganesh Reddy [email protected] Office of Federal Student
Federal Bureau of Prisons. Privacy Impact Assessment for the HR Automation System. Issued by: Sonya D. Thompson Deputy Assistant Director/CIO
Federal Bureau of Prisons Privacy Impact Assessment for the HR Automation System Issued by: Sonya D. Thompson Deputy Assistant Director/CIO Reviewed by: Approved by: Eric Olson, Acting Chief Information
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ML111170543 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Privacy Impact Assessment (Designed to collect the information necessary to make relevant determinations regarding the applicability of the Privacy Act, the
Privacy Impact Assessment for the. E-Verify Self Check. DHS/USCIS/PIA-030(b) September 06, 2013
for the E-Verify Self Check DHS/USCIS/PIA-030(b) September 06, 2013 Contact Point Donald K. Hawkins Privacy Officer United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (202) 272-8030 Reviewing Official
Office of Inspector General
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of Inspector General Security Weaknesses Increase Risks to Critical United States Secret Service Database (Redacted) Notice: The Department of Homeland Security,
Department of State SharePoint Server PIA
1. Contact Information A/GIS/IPS Director Department of State SharePoint Server PIA Bureau of Administration Global Information Services Office of Information Programs and Services 2. System Information
Workers Compensation Program Medical Case Management Services (WC-MCMS)
for the Workers Compensation Program Medical Case Management Services (WC-MCMS) DHS/ALL/PIA-047(a) February 10, 2016 Contact Point Gary Myers Program Manager and Policy Advisor Workers Compensation Program
FHFA. Privacy Impact Assessment Template FM: SYSTEMS (SYSTEM NAME)
FHFA Privacy Impact Assessment Template FM: SYSTEMS (SYSTEM NAME) This template is used when the Chief Privacy Officer determines that the system contains Personally Identifiable Information and a more
Federal Trade Commission Privacy Impact Assessment. Conference Room Scheduling PIA
Federal Trade Commission Privacy Impact Assessment Conference Room Scheduling PIA July 2014 1. System Overview The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) uses conference spaces in various FTC facilities and FTC-leased
Gaming System Monitoring and Analysis Effort
for the Gaming System Monitoring and Analysis Effort DHS/S&T/PIA-025 October 11, 2012 Contact Point Douglas Maughan DHS S&T Cyber Security Division 202-254-6145 Reviewing Official Jonathan R. Cantor Acting
Port Authority of New York/New Jersey Secure Worker Access Consortium Vetting Services
for the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey Secure Worker Access Consortium Vetting Services DHS/TSA/PIA-040 November 14, 2012 Contact Point Joseph Salvator Office of Intelligence & Analysis [email protected]
Virginia Systems Repository (VSR): Data Repositories DHS/FEMA/PIA 038(a)
for the (VSR): DHS/FEMA/PIA 038(a) May 12, 2014 Contact Point Tammy Rinard Recovery Directorate (540) 686-3754 Reviewing Official Karen L. Neuman Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (202)
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment Template
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment Template Name of Project: Reclamation Electronic Document System (REDS) Bureau: Bureau of Reclamation Project s Unique ID: 010-10-01-07-1011-00-404-142
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT Once the Privacy Impact Assessment is completed and the signature approval page is signed, please submit an electronic copy and hard copy with original signatures of the PIA to
Authentication and Provisioning Services (APS)
for the (APS) DHS/FEMA/PIA-031 August 6, 2013 Contact Point Tina Wallace-Fincher Information Technology Security Branch FEMA Information Technology (202) 646-4605 Reviewing Official Jonathan R. Cantor
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media
for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Forensic Analysis of Electronic Media DHS/ICE/PIA-042 May 11, 2015 Contact Point Peter T. Edge Executive Assistant Director Homeland Security Investigations
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Mailroom Package Tracking System (MPTS) PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (MPTS) PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) February 24, 2013 General Information 1. Name of Project or System. (MPTS) 2. Describe the project and its purpose or function
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment
Department of the Interior Privacy Impact Assessment Name of Project: Performance Management Database System (PMDS) Bureau: National Park Service Project s Unique ID: DOI_NPS_167 A. CONTACT INFORMATION:
PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) GUIDE
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Information Technology Alexandria, VA PRIVACY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (PIA) GUIDE Revised January 2007 Privacy Office Office of Information Technology PRIVACY
Justice Management Division
Justice Management Division Privacy Impact Assessment for the Justice Unified Telecommunications Network (JUTNet) Voice Services System Issued by: Arthur E. Gary, General Counsel and Senior Component Official
24x7 Incident Handling and Response Center
for the March 29, 2007 Contact Point Michael Witt Department of Homeland Security (703) 235-5160 Reviewing Official Hugo Teufel III Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (571) 227-3813
August 29 2014. Reviewing Official Karen L. Neuman Chief Privacy Officer Department of Homeland Security (202) 343-1717
for the Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration (FIMA) Risk Insurance Division (RID) Underwriting and Claims Operation Review Tool (U-CORT) DHS/FEMA/PIA-039 August 29 2014 Contact Point Bonnie
Privacy Impact Assessment for the. Remedy System. November 15, 2006. Contact Point Luis Vega, 202-648-9411
Privacy Impact Assessment for the Remedy System November 15, 2006 Contact Point Luis Vega, 202-648-9411 Chief, Operations Performance Management Section Information Services Division (ISD) Office of Science
Clearances, Logistics, Employees, Applicants, and Recruitment (CLEAR)
for Clearances, Logistics, Employees, Applicants, and Recruitment (CLEAR) DHS/USSS/PIA-013 January 3, 2013 Contact Point Latita M. Payne, Privacy Officer United States Secret Service (202) 406-5838 Reviewing
Privacy Impact Assessment
M AY 2, 2013 Privacy Impact Assessment CFPB BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE TOOL Contact Point: Claire Stapleton Chief Privacy Officer 1700 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20552 202-435-7220 [email protected]
Background Check Service
for the Background Check Service Contact Point Elizabeth Gaffin USCIS Privacy Officer United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 202-272-1400 Reviewing Official Hugo Teufel III Chief Privacy Officer
Customer Tracking and Fulfillment
Privacy impact assessment p I a, double black lines. This is a heading that repeat on all following pages Department of the Treasury BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING Customer Tracking and Fulfillment 25
United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (US-VISIT)
for the Conversion to 10-Fingerprint Collection for the United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology Program (US-VISIT) November 15, 2007 Contact Point Barbara M. Harrison, Acting Privacy
United States Department of State Global Financial Management System (GFMS) Privacy Impact Assessment
United States Department of State Global Financial Management System (GFMS) Privacy Impact Assessment CGFS/DCFO/GFMS 1. Contact Information Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Department of State Privacy Coordinator
REMEDY Enterprise Services Management System
for the Enterprise Services Management System April 28, 2016 Contact Point Marshall Nolan Border Enforcement and Management Systems Division Office of Information Technology U.S. Customs & Border Protection
Corporate Property Automated Information System CPAIS. Privacy Impact Assessment
Corporate Property Automated Information System CPAIS Privacy Impact Assessment May 2003 CONTENTS Background...3 Access to the Data...5 Maintenance of Administrative Controls...9 1 Introduction The Office
InCompass, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) 8/3/2011
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY Washington, D.C. 20220 InCompass, Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) 8/3/2011 A. Identification System Name: InCompass Former System Name: Integrated Talent Management (ITM) OMB Unique
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Federal Bureau of Prisons Privacy Impact Assessment for the Forensic Laboratory Issued by: Sonya D. Thompson, Senior Component Official for Privacy, Sr. Deputy Assistant Director/CIO Approved by: Erika
DHS / UKvisas Project
for the DHS / UKvisas Project November 14, 2007 Contact Point Elizabeth Gaffin Associate Counsel United States Citizenship and Immigration Services 202-272-1400 Reviewing Official Hugo Teufel III Chief
Financial Management Service. Privacy Impact Assessment
Financial Management Service Privacy Impact Assessment The Financial Management Service (FMS) Mission is to provide central payment services to Federal Program Agencies, operate the federal government's
Bank Secrecy Act E-Filing. Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Bank Secrecy Act E-Filing. Version 1.5
Bank Secrecy Act E-Filing Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Bank Secrecy Act E-Filing Version 1.5 August13, 2014 E-Filing Privacy Impact Assessment Revision Number Change Effective Date Revision History
Privacy Impact Assessment for TRUFONE Inmate Telephone System
Federal Bureau of Prisons Privacy Impact Assessment for TRUFONE Inmate Telephone System Issued by: Sonya D. Thompson Reviewed by: Approved by: Vance E. Hitch, Chief Information Officer, Department of Justice
ICE Pattern Analysis and Information Collection (ICEPIC)
for the ICE Pattern Analysis and Information Collection (ICEPIC) January 25, 2008 Contact Point Marcy Forman Director Office of Investigations U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (202) 514-0078 Reviewing
Digital Mail Pilot Program
for the Digital Mail Pilot Program June 18, 2010 Contact Point Ronald Boatwright Program Manager, Mail Management (202) 343-4220 Reviewing Official Mary Ellen Callahan Chief Privacy Officer Department
Status: Final. Form Date: 30-SEP-13. Question 1: OPDIV Question 1 Answer: OS
Status: Final Form Date: 30-SEP-13 Question 1: OPDIV Question 1 Answer: OS Question 2: PIA Unique Identifier (UID): Question 2 Answer: P-2277902-798208 Question 2A: Name: Question 2A Answer: Identity and
