1 CS435: Introduction to Software Engineering! " " " " " " " "Dr. M. Zhu! Chapter 3! Agile Development! Slide Set to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner s Approach, 7/e " by Roger S. Pressman Slides copyright 1996, 2001, 2005, 2009 by Roger S. Pressman e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 1!
2 The Manifesto for Agile Software Development! We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value:! Individuals and interactions over processes and tools! Working software over comprehensive documentation! Customer collaboration over contract negotiation! Responding to change over following a plan! That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.! Kent Beck et al! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 2!
3 What is Agility?! Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change (team members, new technology, requirements)! Effective communication in structure and attitudes among all team members, technological and business people, software engineers and managers! Drawing the customer into the team. Eliminate us and them attitude. Planning in an uncertain world has its limits and plan must be flexible.! Organizing a team so that it is in control of the work performed! Eliminate all but the most essential work products and keep them lean.! Emphasize an incremental delivery strategy as opposed to intermediate products that gets working software to the customer as rapidly as feasible.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 3!
4 What is Agility?! Yielding! Rapid, incremental delivery of software! The development guidelines stress delivery over analysis and design although these activates are not discouraged, and active and continuous communication between developers and customers.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 4!
5 Why and What Steps are Agility important?! Why? The modern business environment is fast-paced and ever-changing. It represents a reasonable alternative to conventional software engineering for certain classes of software projects. It has been demonstrated to deliver successful systems quickly.! What? May be termed as software engineering lite The basic activities- communication, planning, modeling, construction and deployment remain. But they morph into a minimal task set that push the team toward construction and delivery sooner.! The only really important work product is an operational software increment that is delivered.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 5!
6 Agility and the Cost of Change!! Conventional wisdom is that the cost of change increases nonlinearly as a project progresses. It is relatively easy to accommodate a change when a team is gathering requirements early in a project. If there are any changes, the costs of doing this work are minimal. But if the middle of validation testing, a stakeholder is requesting a major functional change. Then the change requires a modification to the architectural design, construction of new components, changes to other existing components, new testing and so on. Costs escalate quickly.! A well-designed agile process may flatten the cost of change curve by coupling incremental delivery with agile practices such as continuous unit testing and pair programming. Thus team can accommodate changes late in the software project without dramatic cost and time impact.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 6!
7 Agility and the Cost of Change! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 7!
8 An Agile Process! Is driven by customer descriptions of what is required (scenarios). Some assumptions:! Recognizes that plans are short-lived (some requirements will persist, some will change. Customer priorities will change)! Develops software iteratively with a heavy emphasis on construction activities (design and construction are interleaved, hard to say how much design is necessary before construction. Design models are proven as they are created. )! Analysis, design, construction and testing are not predictable.! Thus has to Adapt as changes occur due to unpredictability! Delivers multiple software increments, deliver an operational prototype or portion of an OS to collect customer feedback for adaption.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 8!
9 Agility Principles - I! 1.!Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software.! 2.!Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. Agile processes harness change for the customer's competitive advantage.! 3.!Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale.! 4.!Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project.! 5.!Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done.! 6.!The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face to face conversation.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 9!
10 Agility Principles - II! 7.!Working software is the primary measure of progress.! 8.!Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.! 9.!Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility.! 10. Simplicity the art of maximizing the amount of work not done is essential.! 11. The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self organizing teams.! 12. At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 10!
11 Human Factors! the process molds to the needs of the people and team, not the other way around! key traits must exist among the people on an agile team and the team itself:! Competence. ( talent, skills, knowledge)! Common focus. ( deliver a working software increment )! Collaboration. ( peers and stakeholders)! Decision-making ability. ( freedom to control its own destiny)! Fuzzy problem-solving ability.(ambiguity and constant changes, today problem may not be tomorrow s problem)! Mutual trust and respect.! Self-organization. ( themselves for the work done, process for its local environment, the work schedule)! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 11!
12 Extreme Programming (XP)! The most widely used agile process, originally proposed by Kent Beck in It uses an object-oriented approach.! XP Planning! Begins with the listening, leads to creation of user stories that describes required output, features, and functionality. Customer assigns a value(i.e., a priority) to each story.! Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost (development weeks. If more than 3 weeks, customer asked to split into smaller stories)! Working together, stories are grouped for a deliverable increment next release.! A commitment (stories to be included, delivery date and other project matters) is made. Three ways: 1. Either all stories will be implemented in a few weeks, 2. high priority stories first, or 3. the riskiest stories will be implemented first.! After the first increment project velocity, namely number of stories implemented during the first release is used to help define subsequent delivery dates for other increments. Customers can add stories, delete existing stories, change values of an existing story, split stories as development work proceeds.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 12!
13 Extreme Programming (XP)! XP Design ( occurs both before and after coding as refactoring is encouraged)! Follows the KIS principle (keep it simple) Nothing more nothing less than the story.! Encourage the use of CRC (class-responsibility-collaborator) cards in an object-oriented context. The only design work product of XP. They identify and organize the classes that are relevant to the current software increment. (see Chapter 8)! For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of spike solutions a design prototype for that portion is implemented and evaluated.! Encourages refactoring an iterative refinement of the internal program design. Does not alter the external behavior yet improve the internal structure. Minimize chances of bugs. More efficient, easy to read.! XP Coding! Recommends the construction of a unit test for a story before coding commences. So implementer can focus on what must be implemented to pass the test.! Encourages pair programming. Two people work together at one workstation. Real time problem solving, real time review for quality assurance. Take slightly different roles.! XP Testing! All unit tests are executed daily and ideally should be automated. Regression tests are conducted to test current and previous components.! Acceptance tests are defined by the customer and executed to assess customer visible functionality! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 13!
14 Extreme Programming (XP)! user stories values acceptance test criteria iteration plan simple design CRC cards spike solutions prototypes refactoring pair programming Release software increment project velocity computed unit test continuous integration acceptance testing e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 14!
15 The XP Debate!! Requirements volatility: customer is an active member of XP team, changes to requirements are requested informally and frequently.! Conflicting customer needs: different customers' needs need to be assimilated. Different vision or beyond their authority.! Requirements are expressed informally: Use stories and acceptance tests are the only explicit manifestation of requirements. Formal models may avoid inconsistencies and errors before the system is built. Proponents said changing nature makes such models obsolete as soon as they are developed.! Lack of formal design: XP deemphasizes the need for architectural design. Complex systems need overall structure to exhibit quality and maintainability. Proponents said incremental nature limits complexity as simplicity is a core value.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 15!
16 Adaptive Software Development (ASD)! Originally proposed by Jim Highsmith (2000) focusing on human collaboration and team self-organization as a technique to build complex software and system.! ASD distinguishing features! Mission-driven planning! Component-based focus! Uses time-boxing (See Chapter 24)! Explicit consideration of risks! Emphasizes collaboration for requirements gathering! Emphasizes learning throughout the process! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 16!
17 Three Phases of ASD! 1. Speculation: project is initiated and adaptive cycle planning is conducted. Adaptive cycle planning uses project initiation information- the customer s mission statement, project constraints (e.g. delivery date), and basic requirements to define the set of release cycles (increments) that will be required for the project. Based on the information obtained at the completion of the first cycle, the plan is reviewed and adjusted so that planned work better fits the reality.!! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 17!
18 Three Phases of ASD! 2. Collaborations are used to multiply their talent and creative output beyond absolute number (1+1>2). It encompasses communication and teamwork, but it also emphasizes individualism, because individual creativity plays an important role in collaborative thinking.! It is a matter of trust. 1) criticize without animosity, 2) assist without resentments, 3) work as hard as or harder than they do. 4) have the skill set to contribute to the work at hand, 5) communicate problems or concerns in a way that leas to effective action.! 3. Learning: As members of ASD team begin to develop the components, the emphasis is on learning. Highsmith argues that software developers often overestimate their own understanding of the technology, the process, and the project and that learning will help them to improve their level of real understanding. Three ways: focus groups, technical reviews and project postmortems.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 18!
19 Adaptive Software Development! adaptive cycle planning uses mission statement project constraints basic requirements time-boxed release plan Requirements gathering JAD mini-specs Release software increment adjustments for subsequent cycles components implemented/tested focus groups for feedback formal technical reviews postmortems e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 19!
20 Dynamic Systems Development Method! It is an agile software development approach that provides a framework for building and maintaining systems which meet tight time constraints through the use of incremental prototyping in a controlled project environment.! Promoted by the DSDM Consortium ( DSDM distinguishing features! Similar in most respects to XP and/or ASD! Nine guiding principles! Active user involvement is imperative.! DSDM teams must be empowered to make decisions.! The focus is on frequent delivery of products.! Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables.! Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution.! All changes during development are reversible.! Requirements are baselined at a high level! Testing is integrated throughout the life-cycle.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 20!
21 Dynamic Systems Development Method! DSDM Life Cycle (with permission of the DSDM consortium) e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 21!
22 Scrum! A software development method Originally proposed by Schwaber and Beedle (an activity occurs during a rugby match) in early 1990.! Scrum distinguishing features! Development work is partitioned into packets! Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is constructed! Work units occurs in sprints and is derived from a backlog of existing changing prioritized requirements! Changes are not introduced in sprints (short term but stable) but in backlog.! Meetings are very short (15 minutes daily) and sometimes conducted without chairs ( what did you do since last meeting? What obstacles are you encountering? What do you plan to accomplish by next meeting?)! demos are delivered to the customer with the time-box allocated. May not contain all functionalities. So customers can evaluate and give feedbacks.! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 22!
23 Scrum! The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 23!
24 Crystal! Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith! Crystal distinguishing features! Actually a family of process models that allow maneuverability based on problem characteristics! Face-to-face communication is emphasized! Suggests the use of reflection workshops to review the work habits of the team! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 24!
25 Feature Driven Development! Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al as a object-oriented software engineering process model.! FDD distinguishing features! Emphasis is on defining features which can be organized hierarchically.! a feature is a client-valued function that can be implemented in two weeks or less.! Uses a feature template! <action> the <result> <by for of to> a(n) <object>! E.g. Add the product to shopping cart.! Display the technical-specifications of the product.! Store the shipping-information for the customer.! A features list is created and plan by feature is conducted! Design and construction merge in FDD! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 25!
26 Feature Driven Development! Reprinted with permission of Peter Coad! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 26!
27 Agile Modeling! Originally proposed by Scott Ambler! Suggests a set of agile modeling principles! Model with a purpose! Use multiple models! Travel light! Content is more important than representation! Know the models and the tools you use to create them! Adapt locally! e (McGraw-Hill, 2009) Slides copyright 2009 by Roger Pressman.! 27!
Software Engineering: A Practitioner s Approach, 6/e Chapter 4 Agile Development copyright 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc. For University Use Only May be reproduced ONLY for student use
Agile Processes Software processes that are: Incremental (small software releases with rapid cycles) Cooperative (customer and developer working together with close communication) Straightforward (method
Chapter 4 Agile Development Moonzoo Kim CS Division of EECS Dept. KAIST 1 Ex. UP Work Products Inception phase Vision document Init ial use-case model Init ial project glossary Init ial business case Init
Software Process in Modern Software Development Lecture 3 Software Engineering i Practice Software engineering practice is a broad array of principles, concepts, methods, and tools that must be considered
Presented by Jennifer Bleen, PMP Project Services Practice of Cardinal Solutions Group, Inc. Contact: Agile Manifesto We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others
Introduction to Agile Software Development EECS 690 Agile Software Development Agenda Research Consent Forms Problem with Software Engineering Motivation for Agile Methods Agile Manifesto Principles into
Ingegneria del Software Corso di Laurea in Informatica per il Management Agile software development Davide Rossi Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Bologna The problem Efficiency: too much effort
Agile Development Methods: Philosophy and Practice CPSC 315 Programming Studio Fall 2010 History of Agile Methods Particularly in 1990s, some developers reacted against traditional heavyweight software
A Cynical View on Agile Software Development from the Perspective of a new Small-Scale Software Industry Apoorva Mishra Computer Science & Engineering C.S.I.T, Durg, India Deepty Dubey Computer Science
Agile QA s Revolutionary Impact on Project Management Introduction & Agenda Rachele Maurer Agile Coach, Platinum Edge Inc. PMP, CSM, PMI-ACP Agenda A quick overview of agile Current QA practices QA using
AGILE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT: INTRODUCTION, CURRENT STATUS & FUTURE Pekka Abrahamsson 23.11.2005 Jyväskylä Fact corner: SME of 250 developers Mobile & desktop sw Products sold globally EXAMPLE OF AN INNOVATIVE
International Journal of Recent Research and Review, Vol. VI, June 2013 Comparative Study of Agile Methods and Their Comparison with Heavyweight Methods in Indian Organizations Uma Kumari 1, Abhay Upadhyaya
Agile Project Management By Mark C. Layton Agile project management focuses on continuous improvement, scope flexibility, team input, and delivering essential quality products. Agile project management
CHAPTER 3 : AGILE METHODOLOGIES 3.1Introductions 3.2 Main Stages in Agile project 3.3 Various Agile Software development methodologies 3.4 Advantage and Disadvantage of Agile Methodology 3.1Introductions
SATORI CONSULTING LEAN AGILE POCKET GUIDE Software Product Development Methodology Reference Guide PURPOSE This pocket guide serves as a reference to a family of lean agile software development methodologies
Case Study Software Development with Agile Methods Introduction: Web application development is a much studied, heavily practiced activity. That is, capturing and validating user requirements, estimating
Agile and Secure: Can We Be Both? OWASP AppSec Seattle Oct 2006 Keith Landrus Director of Technology Denim Group Ltd. email@example.com (210) 572-4400 Copyright 2006 - The OWASP Foundation Permission
Introduction to Agile Software Development Word Association Write down the first word or phrase that pops in your head when you hear: Extreme Programming (XP) Team (or Personal) Software Process (TSP/PSP)
CIMCA 2008, IAWTIC 2008, and ISE 2008 Comparing Agile Software Processes Based on the Software Development Project Requirements Malik Qasaimeh, Hossein Mehrfard, Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj Department of Electrical
AGILE METHODOLOGY IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT Shivangi Shandilya, Surekha Sangwan, Ritu Yadav Dept. of Computer Science Engineering Dronacharya College Of Engineering, Gurgaon Abstract- Looking at the software
Agile Development with C# Paweł Jarosz, firstname.lastname@example.org Cracow University of Technology, Poland Jyvaskyla University of Applied Sciences, February 2009 Paweł Jarosz who am I? M.Sc. of Applied Physics
Rocky Mountain Information Management Association Manifesto for Agile Software Development We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we
Agile Software Development in the Large GI-Vortrag Braunschweig Jutta Eckstein Nicolai Josuttis What Does Large Mean? Large in... scope time people money risks We focus on Large Teams which implies everything
How to manage agile development? Rose Pruyne Jack Reed What will we cover? Introductions Overview and principles User story exercise Retrospective exercise Getting started Q&A About me: Jack Reed Geospatial
Comparative Analysis of Different Agile Methodologies Shelly M. Phil (CS), Department of Computer Science, Punjabi University, Patiala-147002, Punjab, India Abstract: Today s business, political and economic
Agile Project Management with Scrum Resource links http://www.agilealliance.org/ http://www.agilemanifesto.org/ http://www.scrum-master.com/ 1 Manifesto for Agile Software Development Individuals and interactions
D25-2 Agile and Scrum Introduction How to Use this Download This download is an overview of a discussion Intertech has with clients on Agile/Scrum This download has an overview of Agile, an overview of
Agile Project Management: Adapting project behaviors to the software development environment with Bill Doescher, PMP, CSM PrincipalConsultant and Product Development Director Business Management Consultants
Digital Transformation of the Enterprise for SMAC: Can Scrum help? Scope of this Report October 2015 In this paper, we consider the impact of the digital transformation on software development and whether
Agile Project Management with Bill Doescher, PMP, MBA, CSM Pi Principal i lconsultant tand Product tdevelopment tdirector Bill Doescher, PMP, CSM Bill Doescher is a Principal Consultant and Product Development
Agile with XP and Scrum Amit Goel National Agile Software Workshop @ Indore Agile India Conference Agile Software Community of India Disclaimer and Credits Most of material in this presentation has been
AGILE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT BY Sysop Technology Aurangabad-431003 Abstract: Software development which can be delivered fast, quick adaptation to requirements and collecting feed back on required information.
Skalierung von agilen Prozessen Ein Erfahrungsbericht OOP 2003 Jutta Eckstein Nicolai Josuttis This Talk is About Agility Large Experience Success Copyright 2003 by N. Josuttis and J. Eckstein 2 1 What
Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Supriyo Bhattacharjee MOF Capability Maturity Model (CMM) A bench-mark for measuring the maturity of an organization s software process CMM defines 5 levels of process
ITSM Agile Intro Feb 5, 2015 Introduction You and Me Some Agile Background Fun Conversation!!! 1 Who Are You? Experience with Agile? Using some form of Agile? Raise your hand if. Me and Agile Recent Work
Aristotle in an Agile World By Ben Allen Introduction Aim of the presentation is to introduce the agile mindset to software testers, using ancient philosophy as a reference point. What do ancient philosophers
Agile or the PMBOK? You Can Have Both! June 10, 2009 Presented by: David M. Sides, Vice President, ESI Consulting Services www.esi-intl.com Agenda June 10, 2009 Pic? Agile Framework Agile Truths & Myths
Neglecting Agile Principles and Practices: A Case Study Patrícia Vilain Departament de Informatics and Statistics (INE) Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianópolis, Brazil email@example.com Alexandre
What does it mean to be Agile Marek Majchrzak, Andrzej Bednarz Wrocław, 11.10.2011 2 Traditional methods Assumptions: The customer knows what he wants The developers know how to build it Nothing will change
Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology IJCSMC, Vol. 2, Issue. 10, October 2013,
Third 21st CAF Conference at Harvard, in Boston, USA. September 2015, Vol. 6, Nr. 1 ISSN: 2330-1236 A Software Project Management Innovation (SPM) Methodology: A vel Method for Agile Software Development
Issues in Internet Design and Development Course of Instructions on Issues in Internet Design and Development Week-2 Agile Methods Saad Bin Saleem PhD Candidate (Software Engineering) Users.mct.open.ac.uk/sbs85
PMP vs. Scrum Master Compatible or Incompatible? Presented by: Karen Little, PMP, CSM, CBAP, ITIL, MCP, MBA Copyright 2007 by Karen Little 1 Agenda Introductions Background on Agile and SCRUM Methodologies
Processes in Software Development Presented 11.3.2008 by Lars Yde, M.Sc., at Selected Topics in Software Development, DIKU spring semester 2008 Software hall of shame Classic mistakes ACM Code of Ethics
Agile project management: A magic bullet? Prof. Darren Dalcher firstname.lastname@example.org Conferencia Iberoamericana de Calidad del Software Prof. Darren Dalcher 1 Outline I. What is agilility? The agile manifesto
Agile Software Development Methodologies & Correlation with Employability Skills Dineshkumar Lohiya School of Computer and Information Science University of South Australia, Adelaide Dineshkumar.Lohiya@postgrads.unisa.edu.au
Agile Software Development Methodologies and Its Quality Assurance Aslin Jenila.P.S Assistant Professor, Hindustan University, Chennai Abstract: Agility, with regard to software development, can be expressed
So l u t i o n s Blending Agile and Lean Thinking for More Efficient IT Development By Harry Kenworthy Agile development and Lean management can lead to more cost-effective, timely production of information
An Ideal Process Model for Agile Methods Marcello Visconti 1 and Curtis R. Cook 2 1 Departamento de Informática, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, CHILE email@example.com 2 Computer
SCEA 2010 EST06 Estimating Issues Associated with Agile Development Bob Hunt Vice President, Services Galorath Incorporated What Is Agile Software Dev? In the late 1990 s several methodologies began to
1 Requirements Engineering and Agile Software Development Frauke Paetsch Fachhochschule Mannheim firstname.lastname@example.org Dr. Armin Eberlein University of Calgary email@example.com Dr. Frank Maurer
Who Doesn t Want to be Agile? By: Steve Dine President, Datasource Consulting, LLC 7/10/2008 Who wants to be involved in a BI project or program that is labeled slow or inflexible? While I don t believe
Agile Software Development Application in the Medical Device Industry Kelly Weyrauch Medtronic, Inc. (29 April 2008) Introduction Purpose Provide an introduction to Agile Software Development as it applies
Creating a High Maturity Agile Implementation Creating a High Maturity Agile Implementation www.qaiglobal.com 1 Copyright Notice 2015. Unless otherwise noted, these materials and the presentation of them
Agile Practitioner: PMI-ACP and ScrumMaster Aligned The PMI Agile Certified Practitioner (PMI-ACP) ScrumMaster credential validates your ability to understand agile principles, agile concepts, and establishes
USCIS/SPAS: Product Backlog Items and User Stories 4/16/2015 Dr. Patrick McConnell July 9, 2015 1 First, an old joke.. I can t identify an original source for this cartoon. As best as I can tell, the art
Distributed Agile Development Bapiraju Nandury Product Development Manager Bangalore Development Centre Agenda Distributed / offshore Development Agile Methods Distributed Agile Development Goals of this
CSE 435 Software Engineering Sept 16, 2015 2.1 The Meaning of Process A process: a series of steps involving activities, constraints, and resources that produce an intended output of some kind A process
Mitigating Risk with Agile Development Rich Mironov CMO, Enthiosys 2 About Rich Mironov CMO at Enthiosys, agile product mgmt consultancy Business models/pricing, roadmaps Agile transformation and Interim
N ft n il Ionel CRITICAL ANALYSYS OF THE SCRUM PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY The Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, Management Faculty, 6 Romana Square, Sector 1, Bucharest, Management Chair, E-mail:
Erik Philippus IMPROVEMENT BV firstname.lastname@example.org 1 IMPROVEMENT BV Nice to meet you Erik Philippus (191) IMPROVEMENT BV 3 years of experience in industrial automation Foxboro, ESA, Philips Medical,
Agile in Financial Services A Framework in Focus John B. Hudson, B.Sc, PMP, CSM PMI NJ Chapter February 19, 2013 19 Feb 2013 1 Objectives 1. Agile Development an Overview 2. The Agile Enterprise Infrastructure
Agile Software Development Mohsen Afsharchi I. Agile Software Development Agile software development is a group of software development methods based on iterative and incremental development, where requirements
Agile Beyond The Team 1 Dilbert Agile 2 What Does Your Organization Value? Projects over Teams? Do new teams spools up for new projects? On-Time/On-Budget Delivery over Zero Maintenance Products Deliver
Agile Requirements Generation Model: A Soft-structured Approach to Agile Requirements Engineering Shvetha Soundararajan Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Master thesis in Applied Information Technology REPORT NO. 2008:014 ISSN: 1651-4769 Department of Applied Information Technology or Department of Computer Science Bottlenecks in Agile Software Development
AGILE - QUICK GUIDE http://www.tutorialspoint.com/agile/agile_quick_guide.htm Copyright tutorialspoint.com AGILE - PRIMER Agile is a software development methodology to build a software incrementally using
Introduction to Agile Scrum by Julia M. Lobur Penn State Harrisburg CMPSC 487W Fall 2015 Introduction to Scrum Learning Goals Relationship of Scrum to other Agile methods Scrum Framework Scrum Roles Scrum
New Developments in an Agile World: Drafting Software Development Agreements By: Paul H. Arne 1,2 A few months before this article was prepared, a group of senior IT professionals from some of the largest
Software development process A software development process is a structure imposed on the development of a software product Software development activities Requirements analysis The important task in creating
Konferencja "Bezpieczny Projekt" Wrocław 22 czerwca 2010 www.omec.pl Software Development with Agile SCRUM Chandrashekhar Kachole 22 nd of June 2010 1 Let s keep the cell phones in Silent mode 2 Agenda
Requirement Gathering for small Projects using Agile Methods Kavitha C.R Dept of Computer Applications SNGIST N Parur Sunitha Mary Thomas Dept of Computer Applications Christ Knowledge City Airapuram ABSTRACT
Agile Project Management Jim Highsmith Chapter 5 An Agile Project Management Model We improve effectiveness and reliability through situationally specific strategies, processes, and practices. One of the
Agile Systems Engineering: What is it and What Have We Learned? March 2012 Dr. Suzette S. Johnson Agile Engineering Northrop Grumman Suzette.Johnson@ngc.com Getting To Know You! Dr. Suzette Johnson Northrop
REVIEW OF AGILE METHODOLOGIES IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT 1 MALIK HNEIF, 2 SIEW HOCK OW 1 Department of Software Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia-50603 2 Assoc. Prof., Department of
Water-Scrum-Fall Agile Reality for Large Organisations By Manav Mehan Principal Agile consultant Manav.Mehan@tcs.com Interests and Experience Leading Change and Transformation in Large, Complex organisations
Agile software development and its' suitability to distributed project Lihan Guo 52493T Table of Contents 1 Introduction...3 1.1 Background of the study...3 1.2 Research problem...3 1.3 Objectives of the
Waterfall to Agile DFI Case Study By Nick Van, PMP DFI Case Study Waterfall Agile DFI and Waterfall Choosing Agile Managing Change Lessons Learned, Sprints Summary Q and A Waterfall Waterfall Waterfall
by Michael Harris ARTICLE There has been much said and written about the mythical conflict between the values and principles of the Manifesto for Agile Software Development 1 (http://agilemanifesto.org/)
Incorporating Agile Methods in Large-Scale Systems April 30, 2011 Why would a large-scale software development company want to be agile? Agile methods aim to counter the tremendous costs with changes late
Volume 4, Issue 6, June 2014 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com An Agile Methodology
AGILE vs. WATERFALL METHODOLOGIES Introduction Agile and waterfall are two major methodologies that software developers and project managers have the option of using. Some of the goals of developers and