IEEE Cloud Activities

Transcription

1 IEEE Cloud Activities IEEE Cloud Initiative IEEE P2301 IEEE P2302 IEEE Big Data Initiative David Bernstein IEEE Cloud Initiative, IEEE P2300 co-founder 1

2 IEEE Cloud Computing Community Objective: To promote Cloud Computing across the IEEE and the world. Promote education and volunteer activities for all levels of members in Cloud Computing Bring vast interests and uses of Cloud Computing together by sharing information and collaborating on projects 2

3 IEEE Cloud Computing Community Meets monthly with a speaker or review a paper related to cloud computing Active social network: Facebook/LinkedIn/Twitter Published an e-zine called Cloud-Link that focuses on a different cloud computing topic each quarter Published a quarterly newsletter CloudScape Volunteers contribute to our blog The Clear Cloud Kicking off a study group for the IEEE Cloud Computing course Volunteers produce podcasts where we interview people working in the field of Cloud Computing Volunteers contribute and manage the tabs in our web site 3

4 IEEE P2301 Cloud Profiles Guide for Cloud Portability and Interoperability Profiles (CPIP) Chair: John Messina (NIST) Purpose: Develop a guide which advises cloud participants on relevant cloud computing standards Status: Profiles and collection of standards have been selected. First draft expected by end of 2015 Action Plan: Develop a Set of Cloud Profiles (Roles/Functions) Identify a Set of Relevant Cloud Computing Standards Map the Intersection of Profiles and Standards Document Intersection as a Guidance Standard Ensure that the final standard is a living document Website:

5 IEEE P2301 Cloud Profiles For each Cloud Profile P2301 collects the following information: Description of Profile Functionality associated with the Profile Likely relevant standards Possible relevant standards Standard Interoperability / Portability / Use information (CloudWatch) Example: Cloud Service Provider Sub-Role: Inter-cloud Provider Activity: Mange Peer Cloud Services Category: Authentication & Authorization Standards Likely Relevant standards: IEEE P2302 RFC 5246 RFC 3820: X.509 RFC 5280: Internet X.509 ISO :2008 X.509 RFC 5849 ISO X.1254 OpenID Authentication XACML SAML

6 IEEE P Intercloud Public Access Intercloud (CCS) Protocols Federation (Bearer) Network Public Access Public Cloud Public Cloud Intercloud Root Public Cloud Intercloud Exchanges Private Cloud Public 6 Access Intercloud Gateway Internal User Access

7 IEEE P2302 Intercloud Testbed 7

8 IEEE Big Data Initiative Data touches upon a broad spectrum of areas throughout IEEE. Objectives 1. Nurture and curate collaboration across all interested groups for a wellcoordinated approach and message for big data. 2. Launch new initiatives across IEEE in Conferences, Education, Publications, and Standards that address in a comprehensive way the many opportunities and different dimensions of Big Data. 3. Identify and develop new business models based on big data (examples: data portal, data analytics) 4. Develop and grow IEEE s technical community on big data, and to serve as a forum for discussion on the social implications of big data. 5. Ensure IEEE is a leader driving for consistent handling of data, its privacy and security. 8

9 IEEE Big Data Initiative IEEE Technical Activities 9

10

11 Cloud Specifications OASIS is the home of: TOSCA - Topology and Orchestration Spec for Cloud Apps CAMP - Cloud Application Management for Platforms CloudAuthZ - Cloud Authorization ODATA - Open Data AMQP - Advanced Message Queuing Protocol 2

12 Policy Dimension and Standards The Cloud raises issues that touch on the need for standards that address policy components of technical systems and their conformance. PMRM Privacy Management Reference Model PbD-SE Privacy by Design for Software Engineers 3

13 OASIS is a global community of experts who drive the creation and adoption of open standards promoting interoperability, innovation, and freedom of choice. 4

14 Established presence, Current agenda Nonprofit consortium Founded 1993 Global 5,000+ participants 600+ orgs & individuals in 100+ countries Home of 70+ Technical Committees Broad portfolio of standards: security, privacy, Cloud, M2M, IoT, content technologies, energy, egov, legal, emergency management, finance, Big Data, healthcare, + other areas identified by members

15 How OASIS works Technical decisions made by members not staff Democratic Open and transparent Lightweight, ensures integrity of work while allowing for rapid progress Proven, safe IPR Policy Standards freely available in perpetuity Public reviews mandated; mechanism for public comments always available 6

16 Internationally recognized EU classifies OASIS as one of the top three ICT consortia. EU Regulation 1025/2012 allows OASIS specs to be referenced in public procurement. OASIS is permanent member of EC s European Multi-Stakeholder Platform on ICT Standardization. OASIS TC Process is ANSI-accredited. 7

17 Steps to launch Define purpose Identify initial Proposers Draft charter Call for Comment More Proposers join Final charter Call for Participation More people join First Meeting

18 Contact Information Gershon Janssen Board 9

19 The Open Grid Forum Jens Jensen, Sep Open Grid Forum

20 Using OGF in Your Projects Standards body, since 2001 As GGF, merged with Enterprise Grid Alliance to become OGF Academic and Industry Focused on open standards and interoperation IPR statement designed for reuse E.g. turn OGF standard into ISO std 2006 Open Grid Forum 2

21 A Few of the OGF Standards OCCI used by EGI fed cloud OpenNebula, OpenStack, OKEANOS, WNoDes WS-Agreement and WS- AgreementNegotiation GLUE links the world s grid and cloud GridFTP moves hundreds of petabytes every year 2006 Open Grid Forum 3

22 Working with Groups Research, Community, and Working groups Documents: can be informational, experimental, community practice, recommendations (standards) 2006 Open Grid Forum 4

23 Example: FEDSEC-CG Community group focusing on federated security for clouds and grids Formed to join up work on fed sec. in different areas of the world Projects present their work group looks for opportunities for interoperation, sharing, best practices 2006 Open Grid Forum 5

24 Example: IGTF Interoperable Global Trust Federation Formed at OGF (see Global trust infrastructure for academic/ research grids and clouds Ongoing work in CAOPS-WG to look at practices E.g. GFD-125, Grid Certificate Profile Revision GFD.225 to appear 2006 Open Grid Forum 6

25 OGF processes Open processes Everyone can get involved Low barrier to membership Register for an event and turn up! No organisational subscription fees! Aim to co-locate with other events Can form new groups or get involved with existing ones it s easy 2006 Open Grid Forum 7

26 Open Grid Forum liaisons ETSI WS-I DMTF SNIA OGF ISO OASIS IETF See also Alan Sill s presentation from NIST Cloud Comp Forum: Open Grid Forum 8

27 Standards Bodies Diversity of Standards Bodies SNIA, OASIS, DMTF, IETF, IEEE Reflect members desires & expertise SNIA focuses on storage standards (all ISO/IEC) CDMI, SMI-S and Storage Security, working on non-volatile memory standards Everyone who works in standards knows this joke

28 SNIA At-A-Glance Storage Networking Industry Association Not for profit global organization, Member companies span the global storage market. To lead the storage industry worldwide in developing and promoting standards, technologies, and educational services Standards ISO/IEC (CDMI) ISO/IEC (SMI-S) ISO/IEC (Storage Security) Interoperability assurance Plugfests Conformance testing With Reaching Member Organizations In Brazil, China, EMEA, India, Japan, South Asia and USA Active Member Contributors Delivering IT End Users & Storage Professionals Vendor-neutral storage certification 3,500 Certified Professionals 5,500 Certifications Awarded Vendor-neutral education and technology promotion Web & Social Media Events (SDC, DSI, CloudExpo) Thought Leadership in Industry Publications (DCS, SNS) SNIA Dictionary (US, Portuguese & European) Networking & Education Local & Regional Committees

29 Standards Types & Issues Types of standards Best (or Codes Of) Practice Guidelines Methodological Formal standards such as ISO/IEC Proactive; defined before market or common practice No purely proactive examples here CDMI (Cloud Data Management Initiative) Reactive; follows market or based on common practice Most of the standards SMI-S (Storage Management Initiative Specification) De-facto IP (Intellectual Property) Patents, Copyright & Trademarks IANAL but if you are then

30 Standards Benefits Downsides Lawyers Timescales Compromise Upsides Shared experience & feedback Consensus Standards mean: Improved interoperability Increased competition Reduced end user time-to-acceptance Open markets with lower barriers to entry

31 W3C Roadmap and Cloud Towards secure and trusted cloud services in Europe September 24, 2015 in Brussels. html5apps-project.eu Sept 2015 Dr. Daniel Dardailler - W3C

32 World Wide Web Consortium 2 Web Universality Founded by Tim Berners-Lee in 1994 W3C Standards: HTML, CSS, XML, WAI, RDF, http/url/rtc About 80 staff, 4 hosts, 40% Europe

33 The Open Web Platform

34 Web and Cloud Cloud as a specializedapplication of the Web -use URIs, HTTPS, XML, Web Services, etc. Need for more Secure Web Standards Web appsas genericconsumer of Cloud services - Storage, Data-intensive, integration WoT Need for new Interoperable Standards

35 Application Foundations

36 The Roadmap Based on Application Foundations

37 Cloud relevance 7 Highly relevant: - Security/Privacy (identity, signature, encryption) - Web Payments (wallet, API, Card details) - Network Integration (x-origin, socket, rtc, etc) Relevant: - Web of Things - MMI - Data storage Less relevant: UI, App cycle, perf, etc

38 In Summary The Web is the main entry point for online end-users. Similar issues: Security, Privacy, Usability, etc. Lessons from Web standardization: Open Participation, coordination Royalty-free standards, Open Source Coherent Architecture

39 EIT DIGITAL FUTURE CLOUD Text Text European Trusted Cloud High Impact Initiative Janne Järvinen EIT Digital Future Cloud Action Line Leader

40 High impact initiative: Building an European Ecosystem of Trusted Cloud Services To provide consumers and businesses better tools and services to take greater control over the use of sensitive and personal data created by and about them. Text Text

41 Trusted Cloud Ecosystem: Architecture and Offering Consumer services FULL ECOSYSTEM SME services Corporate services Public sector services Customers Ecosystem marketplace Privacy & MyData Encryption &key handling Security & authenticat ion IoT Services Trust plugins Data&content storage Data&content (CFP2016 storage& EB2015) Data Analytics and services Multiple storage providers

42 European Trusted Cloud current status (Sept 2015) First trusted services created: Personal data store, secure , encryption service, malicious file/url scanning. Several pilots started. SME s integrated: technical integration, coaching (business, technology, security) Public dissemination activities started to drive and plan the Future Cloud results visibility and gain more partners during 2016.

43 Trusted Cloud Ecosystem: Who we are (July 2015)

44 European Trusted Cloud impacts, end of 2016 Value added services available all over Europe and globally. Trust enablers that cover wide range of threats in modern context. Knowledge adoption community, to help everyone build trusted services.

45 eitdigital.eu