Integrated Public Alert and Warning System. Template: Emergency Communication Plans and IPAWS FEMA
|
|
|
- April Mitchell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Template: Emergency Communication Plans and IPAWS FEMA 1
2 TEMPLATE: EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS PLANS AND IPAWS This document was created by the Federal Emergency Management Agency s (FEMA s) Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Program Management Office (PMO) to assist state, local, territorial, and tribal public safety officials in the creation of public alert and warning plans. This template can be used in part or in its entirety to support public safety efforts. Executive Summary In times of crisis, the people of {State} continually demonstrate resilience. Timely and effective emergency alert and warning messages can add to that resilience by providing information that citizens can use to make informed decisions and take action to save lives and reduce property losses, effectively reducing the impact of disaster and speeding community recovery. Effective alerts and warnings can help prevent hazards from becoming disasters. {State} strives to improve public safety through the rapid dissemination of emergency messages to as many people as possible over as many communication devices as possible before, during, and after a disaster. To accomplish this, {State} has adopted the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) to augment existing public alert and warning technologies. The purpose of the {State} Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Plan is to formalize {State} processes for communicating with the general public during local and state disasters or emergencies. IPAWS integrates new and existing public alert and warning systems and technologies to provide state and local alert and warning authorities a range of capabilities and dissemination channels, thereby increasing the likelihood that a given message will reach people in an affected area. IPAWS provides state, local, territorial, and tribal governments with the capability to integrate their alert and warning systems with the national alert and warning infrastructure. {State} continues to leverage IPAWS capabilities to expand the delivery of alert and warning information, increase resilience of local systems, and support protection, prevention, mitigation, response, and recovery efforts. The {State} IPAWS Plan details the roles and responsibilities of alerting authorities and public safety officials at the state, local, and federal level. It also documents the criteria for issuing public alert and warnings, types of alerts and warnings, governance, training, and technical requirements for activating alerts. This Plan also addresses best practices for writing effective alert and warning messages, alerting technology, system security and testing, and public education to ensure the people of {State} understand how to access, use, and respond to information from public safety officials. 2
3 Letter from the State Director The people of {State} are the foundation of all our partnerships and the primary reason we work to integrate an effective, reliable, flexible, and comprehensive public alert and warning system. In times of crisis, the people of {State} continually demonstrate resilience. Therefore, it is essential that the public receives timely information to allow them to take the necessary actions to ensure their safety and minimize damage to property. The Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) is designed to improve public safety through the rapid dissemination of emergency messages to as many people as possible over as many communications devices as possible. To accomplish this, {State} has adopted and implemented IPAWS to serve as a complementary alerting system, and ensure alert and warning infrastructure in {State} is resilient, so that no matter what the crisis, the public will receive life-saving information. Our mission requires the energy, effort, and expertise of numerous individuals and organizations that have vested interests in public alert and warning. It is imperative that our public and private sector partners are informed, fully engaged, and committed to advancing alert and warning capabilities across the nation. Implementing IPAWS is a collaborative effort requiring the right resources people, skills, and technologies to ensure the end result is an integrated and interoperable system allowing our leaders and public safety officials to alert and warn {people from the state of} of impending danger. Each partner plays a critical role in achieving the mission, goals, and objectives that are laid out in the {State} Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Plan. {State} is dedicated to fostering, maintaining, and creating enduring relationships to ensure that together we can achieve our shared mission and best serve the people of {State}. Effective this date, the {State} IPAWS Plan is hereby approved. Name, Title Organization Date 3
4 Record of Changes All changes are to be annotated on the master copy of the {State} Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Plan. Should the change be significant in nature, updates shall be made to applicable web pages. If not, changes will be reviewed and incorporated into the Plan during the next scheduled update. This Plan shall be maintained and kept current by all parties on the following schedule: Updates can occur at any time based upon the change of state or federal guidance. A cursory review of the Plan will be performed on an annual basis. Changes will be annotated on the Record of Change sheet. A complete review and update of the Plan will occur every four years, at a minimum. This review will consist of all partners having the opportunity to comment on all elements of the Plan. The review and revision of procedures will follow critiques of actual emergency or disaster operations and/or exercises where deficiencies were noted. Date Posted Change Page / Paragraph / Line Recommending Agency / Individual 4
5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 LETTER FROM THE STATE DIRECTOR... 3 RECORD OF CHANGES 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 PURPOSE 7 AUTHORITY 7 INTEGRATING PUBLIC ALERT AND WARNING SYSTEMS... 7 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 9 STATE... 9 LOCAL... 9 FEDERAL {STATE} STATE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE AUTHORIZED USE OF IPAWS 11 TYPES OF IPAWS MESSAGES TRAINING REQUIREMENTS SOFTWARE FOR SENDING ALERTS ACTIVATING ALERTS SYSTEM SECURITY SYSTEM TESTS PUBLIC OUTREACH 14 WRITING EFFECTIVE ALERT AND WARNING MESSAGES CRITERIA FOR ISSUING IPAWS MESSAGES LOCAL MEDIA APPENDIX A: ACRONYMS 16 APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY 17 APPENDIX C: MESSAGING TEMPLATES APPENDIX D: USING IPAWS IN PRE-PLANNED EVENTS APPENDIX E: FEMA IPAWS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS APPENDIX F: IPAWS ARCHITECTURE APPENDIX G: IPAWS SUPPORTS ALL FIVE MISSION AREAS OF PREPAREDNESS PUBLIC ALERTS AND WARNINGS SUPPORT PREPAREDNESS GOALS PREVENTION
6 PROTECTION MITIGATION RESPONSE RECOVERY APPENDIX H: OTHER TOPICS FOR CONSIDERATION
7 Purpose This document provides policy and procedures agreed upon by the {State} Office of Emergency Management and will permit designated state, local, and federal government officials to issue emergency information, instructions, and warnings to the general public of {State} by activating the alert and warning systems within {State}. Authority Authoritative information for this plan is garnered from the following policies and legislations: {State Statutes related to alert and warning} {State Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)} {State/local governance authorities} Presidential Memorandum, Emergency Alert System Statement of Requirements, September 15, 1995; Executive Order 13407, Public Alert and Warning System, June 26, 2006 Warning, Alert, and Response Network (WARN) Act, October 13, 2006 National Security Presidential Directive- 51(NSPD-51)/Homeland Security Presidential Directive-20 (HSPD-20), National Continuity Policy, May 9, 2007 National Incident Management System, December 2008 Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-21 Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience, 1 February 12, 20130F Executive Order Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, February 12, 2013 National Preparedness Report, March 2013 National Response Framework, Second Edition, May 2013 Integrating Public Alert and Warning Systems The State of {State} has adopted and implemented the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) which facilitates rapid and reliable delivery of alert and warning information over multiple communication pathways before, during, and after an emergency in the preservation of life and property. The State of {State} incorporates IPAWS into the state s existing structure through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), which governs the relationship between the state level Collaborative Operating Groups (COGs) and FEMA. IPAWS provides {State} with the capability to integrate alert and warning systems with the national alert and warning infrastructure. Consequently, IPAWS increases the capability and options 1 Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-21, Implementation of the Directive (6); PPD-21 revokes Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-7, Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection, issued December 17, Plans developed pursuant to HSPD-7 shall remain in effect until specifically revoked or superseded. 7
8 available to state and local officials by which life-saving information can be distributed during a crisis. In {State}, Emergency Alert System (EAS) responsibilities have been shared by the {State} emergency management organization, Emergency Operations Center (EOC), National Weather Service (NWS), and {State} Broadcasters Association since the inception of EAS in the 1990s. NWS has been the most prominent EAS user for severe weather warnings. {State} authorities have chosen to use IPAWS and integrate local alerting and emergency response systems that use Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) standards with the IPAWS infrastructure. Beginning in 2011, the initial IPAWS capabilities were deployed providing public safety authorities at all levels of government with integrated access to send alerts through EAS, Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards, internet applications, sirens, road signs, and other unique local technologies, as well as being able to seamlessly incorporate emerging and future alerting channels and communications technologies. The State of {State} may provide public safety officials with resources to assist them as they adopt CAP, incorporate IPAWS, and ensure their communities understand how to access, use, and respond to public alert and warning information. New alert and warning technologies, particularly alerts to personal cellphones, will only be effective if the public understands the avenues over which alerts are delivered and trusts the emergency messages being sent. State public safety officials strive to ensure emergency communication plans and tools incorporate the latest technologies, can be leveraged to strengthen communication infrastructure, enhance information sharing and situational awareness, and provide the public with critical information. 8
9 Roles and Responsibilities State Recognizing that all disasters are local, the primary responsibility of the state will be to facilitate the implementation of IPAWS into the emergency notification network. In the case of a catastrophic local, state, or regionally-defined event, the state will provide a resilient and comprehensive alert and notification capability. {POC} will be designated the COG point of contact as per the signed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with FEMA. Per {Authority}, {POC} shall be the alternate state agency to provide statewide IPAWS warnings and alerts. {POC} will form a working group comprised of applicable statewide stakeholders to bring together the necessary technical and operational expertise from the private sector, non profits, local jurisdictions, state agencies, and the federal government with the goal of defining policy and procedures leading to the implementation of IPAWS across the state. The working group shall be comprised of, but not limited to, the following agencies: o {State} emergency management office o {State} broadcasters association o NWS Local Weather Forecast Office o Representative from the Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) Emergency Telecommunications Board o Representatives from Commercial Mobile Service Providers (CMSP) o Representatives from local emergency management offices o Representative from the State Emergency Response Commission {POC} will sign all COGs for all local and State Agency Alerting Authorities. {POC} will conduct coordinated periodic tests of the system to ensure functionality of equipment and the network. {POC} will provide a backup capability for local jurisdictions alerting authorities to issue emergency broadcasts on behalf of the local jurisdiction. Local All disasters and emergencies are locally oriented. While first responders are gearing up to respond to the initial aftereffects of an incident, it is an inherent responsibility of local officials to keep the public informed of what actions the public needs to take to protect themselves. These could include: evacuation orders, location of points of distribution (for food, water, medicine, etc.), move to higher ground, shelter in place guidance, take cover, etc. Communicating these instructions to the public is the primary purpose of IPAWS. Because local officials have a better understanding of the situation, the immediate actions that are being taken, and potential adverse impacts of the incident, it is incumbent upon these officials to rapidly and effectively communicate to the public what is going on and what needs to be done. 9
10 In order to successfully accomplish this task, local jurisdictions will have a structure in place to provide for rapid alert and warning. Many of the tasks leading to this structure will include: Submitting to the State a request/plan that identifies emergency notification providers/systems for inclusion into the IPAWS network. Designating in writing, in accordance with jurisdictional procedures, no fewer than three individuals who will be the jurisdiction s alerting authorities for issuing emergency broadcasts with IPAWS following their successful completion of IS 247.A Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) course. (Typically, this would be the jurisdiction s emergency manager and staff.) Incorporating IPAWS into existing and future response plans and procedures as well as training and exercise events. COGs will maintain a list of all individuals who have successfully completed the IS-247.A course and other required courses as directed by federal and state guidance. This list will contain copies of completed course certificates, individual names/ contact information, and copies of memorandum/resolutions officially designating these individuals as alerting authorities. A copy of each jurisdiction s signed Rules of Behavior will also be included. COG-level permissions must be obtained from NWS to submit NWEM via NOAA Weather Radio. Immediately after broadcast, a copy of the alert must be faxed or ed to {Point of Contact and address} and the {alternative POC} must be notified. Federal FEMA is the lead federal agency for IPAWS coordination and implementation. FEMA ensures that the system is maintained and is operational to achieve the following: Build and maintain an effective, reliable, integrated, flexible, and comprehensive alert and warning system. Enable federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local alert and warning emergency communication officials to access multiple broadcast and other communications pathways for the purpose of creating and activating alert and warning messages related to hazards impacting public safety and well-being. Reach the American people before, during, and after a disaster through as many means as possible. Diversify and modernize the EAS. Create an interoperability framework by establishing or adopting standards such as CAP. Enable alert and warning to those with disabilities and others with access and functional needs and to those without an understanding of the English language. Partner with NOAA for seamless integration of message transmission through national networks. Receive and authenticate alert messages, then simultaneously deliver to all IPAWS compliant public alerting systems. 10
11 Continue to engage the media, internet service providers, unique and local alerting system providers as well as future alert technology developers on the implementation of IPAWS. Ensure the required Emergency Management Institute (EMI) courses are available and updated periodically. {STATE} State Emergency Communications Committee {Insert language on committee composition, purpose, roles, responsibilities, authorities, limitations, etc.} Authorized Use of IPAWS IPAWS may be used to alert the public to events that pose a significant threat to life and/or property. IPAWS is a public warning system, NOT a public notification system. Presidential Messages are issued by the President of the United States. AMBER Alerts are issued by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in consultation with state and local AMBER coordinators. Critical weather warnings (e.g. tornados, flash floods, hurricanes, blizzards or ice storms, and dust storms) are issued by NWS. IPAWS will not be used by NWS for other watches and warnings. Alerts issued by an authorized public safety agency using IPAWS may be disseminated to: broadcast media (EAS), weather radios (non-weather emergency messages, or NWEM), cellphones and other mobile devices via Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), internet services, road signs, sirens, etc. Some alerts may be selected to broadcast to one alerting technology, while other alerts may be selected to go to numerous alerting technologies. The primary capability of a WEA (cellphone message) is to quickly announce that an event is occurring or is imminent in the geographic area in which the recipient is located. WEA messages are limited to 90 characters. EAS (broadcasters) and NWEM (weather radio) alerts can provide more information. For example, the Headline element of a NWEM message may be 160 characters and the Description + Instruction elements may be up to 160 words total. Types of IPAWS Messages There are several types of alert messages for which {authorized alerting authorities} will use IPAWS. Warning messages: Warning messages are issued for those events that alone pose a significant threat to public safety and/or property, probability of occurrence and location is high, and the onset time is relatively short. 11
12 Emergency messages: Emergency messages are issued for those events that by themselves would not kill, injure, or damage property, but indirectly may cause other things to happen that result in a hazard. {Selected, authorized departments/positions} is authorized to send the following event codes through IPAWS: Event Codes that can be sent via all three primary (EAS, WEA, NWS) dissemination channels CAE: Child Abduction Emergency CDW: Civil Danger Warning CEM: Civil Emergency Message EQW: Earthquake Warning EVI: Evacuate Immediate FRW: Fire Warning HMW: Hazardous Materials Warning LAE: Local Area Emergency LEW: Law Enforcement Warning NUW: Nuclear Power Plant Warning RHW: Radiological Hazard Warning SPW: Shelter in Place Warning VOW: Volcano Warning Additional Event Codes with restricted dissemination channels: ADR: Administrative Message (Will NOT go to WEA) TOE: 911 Telephone Outage Emergency (Will NOT go to WEA) RMT: Required Monthly Test (Will NOT go to NWEM or WEA) RWT: Required Weekly Test (Will NOT go to NWEM or WEA) Training Requirements Prior to accessing the system and posting alerts, training requirements for IPAWS are as follows: Computer Security Awareness training prior to initial access and annually thereafter, either a locally delivered course or, if not available locally, Domestic Preparedness Campus online course, CYBER 175-W (175-W) Information Security for Everyone ( IS-247.A course for COG point of contact (POC) and any user with alerting authority for IPAWS public alerts ( o The COG POC must complete IS-247.A and submit a copy of his/her training certificate as part of the application process. All other training records are maintained locally. 12
13 Software for Sending Alerts A list of system developers is available on the FEMA website and indicates which vendors have completed or are in the process of developing alerting tools for use with IPAWS. ( Activating Alerts The four free-text fields of an alert (Headline, Description, Instruction and CMAMtext must be reviewed before posting. Rushed alerts with poor wording can have disastrous effects. To avoid errors, pre-script messages with as much information as possible prior to an event. System Security To ensure the joint security of the systems and the message data they store, process, and transmit, all parties participating in IPAWS agree to the terms and conditions as stated in their MOAs and the IPAWS Rules of Behavior, which can be found at System Tests At the local, county, and state level, quarterly tests or exercises of IPAWS will be conducted to ensure the ability to send emergency notification information across the entire network. Testing should be coordinated prior to execution to ensure appropriate rules and regulations are followed. Any impediments will be immediately identified and a resolution at the lowest jurisdictional level possible will be ascertained. It is pertinent to define which test codes will/should work for each dissemination channel because these may be slightly different for each state, depending on their existing EAS Plan. The following test codes are defined for IPAWS dissemination: The Required Weekly Test (RWT) message is logged by TV and radio stations for EAS and does not interrupt broadcasting. RWT will not be carried over NOAA Weather Radio or cellphones for WEA. The Required Monthly Test (RMT) message will interrupt TV and radio broadcasting for EAS, but will not be carried over NOAA Weather Radio or cellphones for WEA. The Demonstration Message (DMO) is carried over NOAA Weather Radio, and in some cases a DMO will interrupt TV and radio broadcasting for EAS (because broadcasters also monitor NOAA Weather Radio). DMO will not be carried over cellphones for WEA. There is currently no authorized test message for WEA. It is anticipated that the FEMA IPAWS Program Management Office (PMO) will conduct tabletop, scenario-based, and full-scale exercises of the public alert and warning communication systems. Where applicable, all jurisdictions will be encouraged to participate in these exercises. Additionally, the state and/or local jurisdictions may find it necessary to conduct IPAWS-only exercises to test the connectivity of the network. Even though these 13
14 exercises may involve a small portion of the response community, they do need to be included in the state regionally defined Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (TEPW) calendars. If an IPAWS component is to be part of a larger exercise, then it does not need to be included on a TEPW calendar. Public Outreach Writing Effective Alert and Warning Messages How an alert/warning message is written is as important as what is written. Poorly written warnings can undermine both understanding and credibility. Style" refers to how you write. Considerations when writing accessible and usable alert and warning messages should include: Specificity: If the message is not specific enough about the Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?, the public will spend more time seeking specific information to confirm the risk. If necessary, be specific about what is or is not known about the hazard. Consistency: An alert/warning should be internally consistent; that is, one part of the message should not contradict another part. It should be consistent with messages that are distributed via other channels. To the extent possible, alerts/warnings should be consistent from event to event, to the degree that the hazard is similar. Certainty: Avoid conveying a sense of uncertainty, either in content or in tone. Confine the message to what is known, or if necessary, describe what is unknown in certain terms. Do not guess or speculate. Clarity: Use common words that can easily be understood. Do not use technical terminology or jargon. If protective instructions are precautionary, state so clearly. Make it clear if protective instructions pertain to particular at risk populations (e.g., elderly). If the probability of occurrence of the hazard event is less than 100 percent, try to convey in simple terms what the likelihood of occurrence is. Accuracy: Do not overstate or understate the facts. Do not omit important information. Convey respect for the intelligence and judgment of the public. To this end, only those individuals who have successfully completed the IS-247.A course and have been officially designated by their jurisdiction as an alerting authority will be provided access to the system. FEMA approves the state designated POC; this POC will then be responsible for verifying and certifying applicable state agency, local jurisdiction, and tribal government alerting authorities within the state. Criteria for Issuing IPAWS Messages When circumstances arise and the need for a public warning becomes necessary, the decision to send a message will ultimately be a matter of local judgment. To assist in the decision making process the following criteria can be applied: Does the hazardous situation require the public to take immediate action? 14
15 Does the hazardous situation pose a serious threat to life or property? Is there a high degree of probability the hazardous situation will occur? Do other means of disseminating the ensure rapid delivery of urgent information? Local Media Local media has a desire to keep its audience informed of ongoing events. Besides their broadcasts, many have developed instant messaging systems to keep the public informed of important events through a variety of social media networks. Coordination with local media outlets is essential for the successful implementation of the {State} IPAWS Plan. By making use of media s desire to inform its audience, public safety officials in {State} have and will continue to establish relationships with the media for the passage of critical, time-sensitive, information to the public. The challenge is that many media outlets are market-driven and are not constrained by political boundaries. In many cases, a television or radio broadcast station that covers multiple counties/parishes or state defined regions may be physically located in a neighboring state. Through multiple mediums, such as newspaper articles, public service announcements, town hall meetings, or other avenues that the jurisdiction has found effective, the general public will be encouraged to continue to listen to and follow officials guidance about what to do when a disaster occurs. Periodically (especially after an incident occurs) the public should be canvassed as to the clarity and effectiveness of the messages that were broadcast. The responses should be reviewed to determine if any changes to the message content need to take place. The results should also be passed to the applicable state agency in order to share them for the benefit of other jurisdictions. 15
16 APPENDIX A: ACRONYMS CAP CDW CEM CMAS CMRS COG CMRS EAS EMA EMI EOC EOP FEMA FIPS ICS IPAWS LAE LEW MOA NAWAS NCMEC NOAA NWEM NWR NWS OEM OPEN P2P PKI PMO POC RMT RWT TEPW WEA Common Alerting Protocol Civil Danger Warning Civil Emergency Message Commercial Mobile Alert System Commercial Mobile Radio Service Collaborative Operating Group Commercial Mobile Radio Service Emergency Emergency Alert System Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management Institute Emergency Operations Center Emergency Operations Plan Federal Emergency Management Agency Federal Information Processing Standard Incident Command System Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Local Area Emergency Law Enforcement Warning Memorandum of Agreement National Warning System National Center for Missing and Exploited Children National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Non Weather Emergency Message National Weather Radio National Weather Services Office of Emergency Management Open Platform for Emergency Networks Peer-to-Peer Public Key Infrastructure Program Management Office Point of Contact Required Monthly Test Required Weekly Test Training and Exercise Planning Workshop Wireless Emergency Alert 16
17 APPENDIX B: GLOSSARY Agency Representative A person assigned by a primary, assisting, or cooperating federal, state, territorial, tribal, or local government agency or private entity that has been delegated authority to make decisions affecting that agency s or organization s participation in incident management activities following appropriate consultation with the leadership of that agency. Agency A division of government with a specific function offering a particular kind of assistance. In the Incident Command System (ICS), agencies are defined either as jurisdictional (having statutory responsibility for incident management) or as assisting or cooperating (providing resources or other assistance). Alerting Authority Designated jurisdictional individual who is authorized to write and distribute an alert or warning. Civil Danger Warning (CDW) A warning of an event that presents a danger to a significant civilian population. The CDW, which usually warns of a specific hazard and gives specific protective action, has a higher priority than the Local Area Emergency (LAE) (e.g. contaminated water supply, terrorist attack). Public protective actions could include evacuation, shelter in place, or other actions (such as boiling contaminated water or seeking medical treatment). Civil Emergency Message (CEM) An emergency message regarding an in-progress or imminent significant threat(s) to public safety and/or property. The CEM is a higher priority message than the Local Area Emergency (LAE), but the hazard is less specific than the Civil Danger Warning (CDW). Collaborative Operating Group IPAWS is structured around Collaborative Operating Groups (COG). A COG is a virtual organization of alerting authorities that holds membership in IPAWS- OPEN and manages system access within that organization. When the application process is complete, FEMA will assign each agency a COG Identification number and Digital Certificate. Disaster The occurrence or imminent threat of widespread or severe damage, injury, or loss of life or property, or significant adverse impact on the environment, resulting from any natural or technological hazards, or a terrorist act, including but not limited to fire, flood, earthquake, wind, storm, hazardous substance incident, water contamination requiring emergency action to avert danger or damage, epidemic, air contamination, blight, drought, infestation, explosion, civil disturbance, or hostile military or paramilitary action. For the purpose of state or federal disaster declarations, the term disaster generally falls into one of two categories relative to the level of severity and impact on local and state resources. They are: Major - likely to require immediate state assistance supplemented by limited federal resources, if necessary, to supplement intra-state efforts and resources; and Catastrophic - will require immediate and massive state and federal assistance in both the response and recovery aspects. Local government's adaptation of the definition of a disaster denotes an event which threatens or 17
18 actually does inflict damage to people or property, and is, or is likely to be, beyond the capability of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of a local jurisdiction, thereby requiring the augmentation of resources through state-directed assistance. Emergency A suddenly occurring and often unforeseen situation which is determined by the Governor to require state response or mitigation actions to immediately supplement local government in protecting lives and property, to provide for public health and safety, or to avert or lessen the threat of a disaster. Local government's adaptation of this definition connotes an event that threatens or actually does inflict damage to people or property, exceeds the daily routine type of response, and still can be dealt with using local internal and mutual aid resources. Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) In the event of a national emergency, the President will be able to use IPAWS to send a message to the American people quickly and simultaneously through multiple communications pathways. IPAWS is available to United States Federal, State, local, territorial and tribal government officials as a way to alert the public via the Emergency Alert System (EAS), Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), NOAA Weather Radio and other National Weather Service dissemination channels, the internet, existing unique warning systems, and emerging distribution technologies. Jurisdiction A range or sphere of authority. Public agencies have jurisdiction at an incident related to their legal responsibilities and authority for incident mitigation. Jurisdictional authority at an incident can be political or geographical (e.g., city, county, state or federal boundary lines) or functional (e.g., police department, health department). Law Enforcement Warning (LEW) - A warning of a bomb explosion, riot, or other criminal event (e.g. a jailbreak). An authorized law enforcement agency may blockade roads, waterways, or facilities, evacuate or deny access to affected areas, and arrest violators or suspicious persons. Local Area Emergency (LAE) - An emergency message that defines an event that, by itself, does not pose a significant threat to public safety and/or property. However, the event could escalate, contribute to other more serious events, or disrupt critical public safety services. Instructions, other than public protective actions, may be provided by authorized officials. Examples include a disruption in water, electric or natural gas service, or a potential terrorist threat where the public is asked to remain alert. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) An agreement document between two or more agencies establishing reciprocal assistance to be provided upon request (and if available from the supplying agency) and laying out the guidelines under which this assistance will operate. Mutual-Aid Agreement Written agreement between agencies and/or jurisdictions that they will assist one another upon request, by furnishing personnel, equipment, and/or expertise in a specified manner. 18
19 National Warning System (NAWAS) A communication system of the federal government which provides warning to the population of an attack or other national emergency. Reception is at local and state warning points. National Weather Services (NWS) Federal government agencies charged with weatherrelated reporting and projections. Shelter in place Take immediate shelter where you are at home, work, school, or wherever you can take protective cover. It may also mean "seal the room ; in other words, take steps to prevent outside air from coming in. State When capitalized, refers to any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any possession of the United States. See Section 2 (14), Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L , 116 Stat (2002). 19
20 APPENDIX C: MESSAGING TEMPLATES Emergency Alert System (EAS) message Event Code1F2 (required) ADR, AVA, AVW, CAE, CDW, CEM, EQW, EVI, FRW, HMW, LAE, LEW, NUW, RHW, RMT, RWT, SPW, TOE, VOW This is the <eventcode> CAP element County Code(s)2F3 (required) 6-digit extended FIPS code(s) not to exceed 31 codes This is the <geocode> CAP element with a valuename of SAME and value of a SAME 6-digit location Sent Time (required) Must be within +/- 5 minutes of current time This is the <sent> CAP element Expires Time (required) Must not exceed Sent Time by 99.5 hours This is the <expires> CAP element Sender Name (required) Human-readable name of agency or authority issuing alert This is the <sendername> CAP element Description (required) Human readable description of the hazard or event This is the <description> CAP element Instruction (optional) Human readable instruction to targeted recipients This is the <instruction> CAP element EAS message 3F4 A CIVIL AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED A [text from Event Code] FOR THE (FCC required text + description + instruction) 1800 characters or less 2 The Event Code will be rendered based on the textual equivalent listed in 47 CFR Part 11, 11.31(e) 3 The County Code (aka FIPS code) will be rendered based on the textual equivalent listed in ANSI INCITS "Information technology-codes for the Identification of Counties and Equivalent Areas of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Insular Areas" 4 The EAS message will be rendered according to the formula defined in ECIG Recommendations for a CAP EAS Implementation Guide, Version 1.0 FCC Required Text + Description + Instruction Where FCC Required Text includes the Originator, Event, Location and the valid time period of an EAS message. And where the Description and/or Instruction may be truncated to ensure the overall message is 1800 characters or less. 20
21 Emergency Alert System (EAS) message FOLLOWING COUNTIES/AREAS: [text from County Code(s)] AT [h:mm AM/PM formatted time from Sent Time] ON [mmm dd, yyyy formatted date from Sent Time] EFFECTIVE UNTIL [h:mm AM/PM formatted time from Expires Time]. Message from [text of Sender Name]. [text from Description]. [text from Instruction]. Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) message 90-Char Text4F5 (optional) 90 characters or less, no phone numbers, no URLs This is the <parameter> CAP element with a valuename of CMAMtext and value of free form text limited in length to 90 English characters NOAA Weather Radio (NWR) message Sender Name5F6 (required) Human-readable name of agency or authority issuing alert This is the <sendername> CAP element Headline (required) characters or less This is the <headline> CAP element Description (required) (Instruction + Description) 160 words or less This is the <description> CAP element Instruction (optional) (Instruction + Description) 160 words or less This is the <instruction> CAP element NWR message THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE IS TRANSMITTED AT THE REQUEST OF THE [text from Sender Name]. [text from Headline]. [text from Description]. [text from Instruction]. 5 If this element is not present, the WEA message will be rendered according to the formula defined in Joint ATIS/TIA CMAS Federal Alert Gateway to CMSP Gateway Interface Specification <eventcode> in this area until <expires> [<responsetype>, or "Take Shelter Now" if <eventcode>=spw, or "Evacuate Now" if <eventcode>=evi] <sendername> 6 Must be of the form <CogName>,<City>,<State> 21
22 Assumptions: The additional required fields for each dissemination channel are correctly populated The alerting tool will map the required fields to the proper CAP fields The element values used to populate the CAP message are consistent with COG permissions such that permissions-based errors are not generated References: 47 CFR Part 10 ( 47 CFR Part 11 ( &idno=47) ECIG Recommendations for a CAP EAS Implementation Guide, Version 1.0 ( Joint ATIS/TIA CMAS Federal Alert Gateway to CMSP Gateway Interface Specification Common Alerting Protocol Version 1.2 ( Common Alerting Protocol, v. 1.2 USA Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Profile Version 1.0 ( IPAWS-OPEN v3.04 Web-Service Interface Design Guidance ANSI INCITS "Information technology-codes for the Identification of Counties and Equivalent Areas of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Insular Areas" NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION ( 22
23 APPENDIX D: USING IPAWS IN PRE-PLANNED EVENTS The use of IPAWS in advance of a pre-planned event is a viable method to alert the public of an event and mitigate panic and risk to the public and participants. These messages would advise the public of the event, communicate there is no cause for alarm, or warn the public of any potential risks. This guideline does not override the authority of the individual jurisdiction s elected officials and emergency management staff. Any alert must still be approved by the alerting authority for the jurisdiction before being sent. Planning: During the planning of a pre-planned event (exercise or public event), the risks associated with the event should be identified. If the planned event has a potential risk to the public or public safety, the use of IPAWS to mitigate that risk may be appropriate. Examples of events and risks: Controlled burn of large area Risks: Smoke on roadway impairing driving, medical conditions of people in area School Active Shooter Exercise Risks: Panic of the general public in the area, Good Samaritan s reaction and putting the players at risk Major bicycle road race Risks: Traffic accidents, injury to riders and bystanders During the planning for each event, the authority should review the event and identify the risks. These risks should be reviewed against the permitted uses and target audiences of the various IPAWS dissemination media. The alerting authority will determine if the use of IPAWS is appropriate. Guidelines for the use of IPAWS should be defined and documented in the event plan or an appendix. Authorized Use: IPAWS has several dissemination pathways. Each system has a different audience and rules for use. Dissemination System Emergency Alerting System (EAS) Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) Non-Weather Emergency Messages (NWEM) Audience Rules Notes Broadcast radio and television viewers (not internet or satellite) Wireless phones in the area of the alert Weather radio users 47 CFR 11 State EAS Plan 47 CFR 10 NWS policies Broadcasters are not required to retransmit alerts from local authorities. An EAS alert will be delivered to a large audience. WEA has specific criteria for use. See * below. NWEM alerts will be sent to a National Weather Service transmitter that covers a large area. The alert may also be rebroadcast by broadcast radio and television as an EAS message, but the entities are not required to do so. 23
24 Dissemination System IPAWS All Hazards Alert Feed Collaborative Operating Group (COG) to COG Audience Rules Notes Third-party software and service providers; usually a subscription type service Other specific COGs IPAWS rules IPAWS rules Currently, defining specific criteria for delivery due to the many varied systems using this data is unclear. Used to coordinate and share information between COGs. Message Format/Content: When using IPAWS for a pre-planned event, the alerting authority has the ability to write alert messages in advance to properly communicate the message. Using message templates, various expected messages should be developed to use or have available in the event they are needed. 24
25 APPENDIX E: FEMA IPAWS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Who can sign up to use IPAWS in {State}? {State Government Organizations} {Local Government or Public Safety Organizations} Pathways for alerting are: Emergency Alert System (EAS): alerts to broadcasters Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA): alerts to cellphones Non-Weather Emergency Message (NWEM): alerts to NOAA Weather Radio All Hazards o In addition to signing up for IPAWS, operational NWEM capability requires additional COG level permissions from the National Weather Service to submit NEWM messages. For more information, refer to: Relation with Governance Structure Alerting authorities should reference their state emergency communications and EAS plans to govern alerting responsibilities for their state and local jurisdictions. COG permissions, including alerting jurisdictions and permissible alerting codes, should be established in accordance with established state emergency communications and EAS plans. All state EAS plans are available on the Federal Communications Commission website at: 25
26 How to sign up for IPAWS: 1. Select IPAWS compatible software Access to IPAWS is free; however, to send a message using IPAWS, an organization must procure its own IPAWS compatible software. i. You should ensure that the software that is chosen meets your organization s specific requirements Consult with your software developer to ensure your system is IPAWS-OPEN compatible and provides the capabilities that your organization requires. For a list of private sector developers who have access to IPAWS-OPEN, please view the list of IPAWS-OPEN developers at 2. Apply for a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with FEMA To become a COG, a MOA governing system security must be executed between the sponsoring organization and FEMA. Each MOA is specifically tailored to the sponsoring organization and their interoperable software system. Download and complete the IPAWS Operational COG Application: this application directly to FEMA at: [email protected]. Please indicate in the subject line of the COG Application. The FEMA COG coordinator will prepare and return the MOA for signature after it is submitted and assign a COG identification (ID). After being signed by the applicant, the MOA will be routed for FEMA signatures. A copy of the executed MOA and the COG-specific digital certificate will be returned to the sponsoring organization. Both the COG ID and digital certificate are necessary to configure the IPAWS compatible software system. After completing these steps, the 26
27 organization will have the capability to exchange messages and content between COGs. Please note, these messages will not be sent to the public. 3. Apply for public alerting permissions If applicable, you will receive a public alerting application along with your unsigned MOA. This application must be signed by the designated state official. Complete this application defining the types of alerts a COG intends to issue and the extent of its geographic warning area. i. The contact information for the designated state reviewer will be provided with the public alerting application. This form will be submitted for approval to: i. The State of {State} at: [email protected] Once the signed form is received, please send it to [email protected]. 4. Complete IPAWS web-based training Complete IS-247.A i. The goal of this course is to provide authorized public safety officials with: 1. Increased awareness of the benefits of using IPAWS for effective public warnings 2. Skills to draft appropriate, effective, and accessible warning messages 3. Best practices in the effective use of Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) to reach all members of their communities ii. The course should take approximately two hours to complete and is a prerequisite for full access to IPAWS-OPEN for the purpose of public alerting. FEMA does not provide training on third-party authoring software. Contact your vendor for any software support questions. Send the Certificate of Achievement to: i. The State of {State} at: [email protected] ii. FEMA at: [email protected] Completing the application Once the public alerting application and web-based training are complete, specific alerting permissions will be implemented in IPAWS-OPEN. At that point the individual members specified by the COG will be able to send alerts and warnings in the geographically prescribed areas. Initial functionality includes the ability to access and send alerts through: the Emergency Alert System (EAS) the National Weather Service (NWS) All-Hazards Emergency Message Collection System for NWS-approved alerting authorities Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA), depending on local implementation by commercial mobile service providers. 27
28 Go to for a list of emergency management organizations with access to IPAWS for public alerting. The {State} Emergency Management and Homeland Security Director recommends going to the FEMA IPAWS website at to view a short five minute video about IPAWS before beginning the process of implementing IPAWS in your jurisdiction. In addition to the introductory video, IPAWS informational materials, including the IPAWS Toolkit for Alerting Authorities, can be found at and at [email protected]/ipaws. APPENDIX F: IPAWS ARCHITECTURE 28
29 APPENDIX G: IPAWS SUPPORTS ALL FIVE MISSION AREAS OF PREPAREDNESS Public Alerts and Warnings Support Preparedness Goals The Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) support all preparedness mission areas: prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery efforts. IPAWS delivers coordinated, prompt, reliable, and actionable information to the whole community through the use of clear, consistent, accessible, and culturally and linguistically appropriate methods. IPAWS effectively relays information regarding any threat or hazard, as well as the actions being taken and the assistance being made available, as appropriate. [These points can be used in policy writing, grant writing, etc. to increase understanding of the value and impact public alerts and warnings can have in support of all aspects of emergency management.] Prevention Communicates timely and well-coordinated information to the public through standardized procedures Informs the American public of pending threats, as appropriate, and provides critical instruction on the precautions necessary to protect themselves, their families, and their property Tailors alerts to best meet the specific needs of the audience Shares prompt and actionable messages with the public and other stakeholders, as appropriate, to aid in the prevention of imminent or follow-on terrorist attacks Protection Protects and enhances the overall physical and logistical health of communications Improves the sector s national security and emergency preparedness posture with state, local, territorial, tribal, federal, international, and private sector entities to reduce risk Mitigation Warns people of the risks in their community and the actions they can take to mitigate those threats Alerts children, individuals with disabilities or access and functional needs, diverse communities, and people with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Supports and increases the number of communities that develop and share risk reduction products Provides the tools necessary to make decisions quickly Shares information obtained through coordinating activities to inform response and recovery decision making by effectively communicating threat and hazard risk analysis 29
30 Response Informs all affected segments of the community by all means necessary, including accessible tools, of critical lifesaving and life-sustaining information to expedite the delivery of emergency services and aid the public in taking protective actions Delivers credible messages to inform ongoing emergency services and the public about protective measures and other life-sustaining actions and facilitate the transition to recovery Recovery Informs all affected segments of the community by all means necessary, including accessible tools Utilizes existing resources to promote effective recovery and support states, territories, tribes, federal, and other jurisdictions affected by a disaster Promotes effective recovery, particularly for those incidents that are large-scale or catastrophic Provides a flexible structure that enables disaster recovery managers to operate in a unified and collaborative manner Manages expectations throughout the recovery process and ensures the public has a clear understanding of available assistance and their roles and responsibilities Supports the development of state, local, tribal, territorial, and federal government communications plans APPENDIX H: OTHER TOPICS FOR CONSIDERATION [When updating emergency communication plans, addressing these topics may be of benefit to stakeholders.] Child abduction activation procedures Weather-related activation procedures State and local officials authorized to activate public alerts and warnings Authentication procedures to activate public alerts and warnings Private sector alerting partners {State} alerting maps Testing requirements Coordination with neighboring states 30
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Get Alerts. Stay Alive. Texas Emergency Division of Emergency Management
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Get Alerts. Stay Alive. Texas Emergency Division of Emergency Management Antwane Johnson, Director May 14, 2014 Presidential Direction Executive Order
LOCAL AREA EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE PIMA COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA PIMA, SANTA CRUZ, COCHISE AND SOUTHERN PINAL COUNTIES ------------
LOCAL AREA EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE PIMA COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA ------------ PIMA, SANTA CRUZ, COCHISE AND SOUTHERN PINAL COUNTIES ------------ EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2007 Revised 12/26/2007
FCC EAS PLAN San Francisco Bay Area. California Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma
FCC EAS PLAN San Francisco Bay Area California Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma [FCC Approved Original 9/15/97] Revision September 14,
Glossary of Terms Tab 7 03.12.14
Glossary of Terms Tab 7 03.12.14 Activate Activator Activation ASCII Code Atom ATOM RSS Feed Attention Signal Authority Automatic Interruption CAP Capability (verb) Describes the process of originating
It also provides guidance for rapid alerting and warning to key officials and the general public of a potential or occurring emergency or disaster.
Emergency Support Function #2 Communications ESF Coordinator: Information Technology Department Support Agencies: Tucson Fire Department Parks and Recreation Department Tucson Police Department Tucson
ESF 02 - Communications Annex, 2015
ESF 02 - Communications Annex, 2015 Table of contents I. Introduction... 3 A. Purpose... 3 B. Scope of Operations... 3 C. Specific Authorities and References... 4 II. Situation and Assumptions... 4 A.
Table of Contents ESF-12-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 2 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
This handbook provides EAS participants summary instructions for conducting EAS notifications and tests of national, state and local alerts.
2 The Emergency Alert System (EAS) is a national public warning system that requires broadcasters, cable television systems, wireless cable systems, wireline video providers, satellite digital audio radio
UCF Office of Emergency Management. 2013-2018 Strategic Plan
UCF Office of Emergency Management 2013-2018 Strategic Plan Table of Contents I. Introduction... 2 Purpose... 2 Overview... 3 Mission... 5 Vision... 5 II. Mandates... 6 III. Accomplishments and Challenges...
Version 1.0. Nationwide Emergency Alert System Test Informational Toolkit
Version 1.0 Nationwide Emergency Alert System Test Informational Toolkit Updated: August 15, 2011 Introduction FEMA is working to provide EAS-relevant information for the Ready.gov Campaign and National
FCC EAS PLAN San Francisco Bay Area. California Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma
FCC EAS PLAN San Francisco Bay Area California Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma [FCC Approved Original 9/15/97] Revision September 14,
Draft 8/1/05 SYSTEM First Rev. 8/9/05 2 nd Rev. 8/30/05 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
Draft 8/1/05 SYSTEM First Rev. 8/9/05 2 nd Rev. 8/30/05 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE - The University of Hawaii System Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) provides procedures for managing
Georgia College Emergency Notification System Activation Protocols
Georgia College Emergency Notification System Activation Protocols Georgia College & State University Office of Emergency Preparedness and Occupational Safety December 2013 I. Introduction and Purpose
Alabama Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan
Alabama Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plan Emergency Support Function (ESF) #1 - Transportation Primary Support Agency: Support Agencies: Secondary Agencies: Transportation Public Safety Military
ON-SITE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
ON-SITE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT Capability Definition Onsite Incident is the capability to effectively direct and control incident activities by using the Incident Command System (ICS) consistent with the
March 1997 &FM. Handbook. Post at all station operator positions. Federal Communications Commission. Emergency Alert System
March 1997 &FM AM Handbook Post at all station operator positions Federal Communications Commission Emergency Alert System Attention Station Managers Pocket for EAS Authenticator Envelope Ensure the Authenticator
LAWRENCE COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN ESF-13
LAWRENCE COUNTY, KENTUCKY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND SECURITY ESF-13 Coordinates and organizes law enforcement and security resources in preparing for, responding to and recovering from
EMERGENCY MESSAGE TEMPLATES
General Guidelines: EMERGENCY MESSAGE TEMPLATES Text messages may not be longer than 160 characters, including spaces. E-mail and voice mail messages should generally be the same message. There are two
ANNEX 9. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND WARNING
ANNEX 9. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND WARNING Rapid dissemination of warning and emergency information about an imminent or occurring emergency is critical to protecting life, safety, and health during an emergency.
For Official Use Only. Springfield-Greene County, Missouri Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan 2016-2018 (TEP) July 27, 2015. For Official Use Only
For Official Use Only Springfield-Greene County, Missouri Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan 2016-2018 (TEP) July 27, 2015 For Official Use Only SPRINGFIELD-GREENE COUNTY Point of Contact Erin Pope
Emergency Support Function 15 External Affairs. Warning
Emergency Support Function 15 External Affairs Warning Primary Agency Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) Support Agencies Illinois State Police (ISP) Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR)
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM San Diego County Operational Area Issued JANUARY 1998 Major Revision JANUARY 2006 Minor Revision June 21, 2012 Prepared by the San Diego Local Emergency Communications Committee
NIMS ICS 100.HCb. Instructions
NIMS ICS 100.HCb Instructions This packet contains the NIMS 100 Study Guide and the Test Questions for the NIMS 100 final exam. Please review the Study Guide. Next, take the paper test - record your answers
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES ANNEX I RISK COMMUNICATIONS APPENDIX 2 EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM (EAS) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...2 1.1 HISTORY...2 1.2 AREA OF COVERAGE...2
ANNEX C - EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION ESF #15
I. MNWALK REQUIREMENTS Item #: 1, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ANNEX C - EMERGENCY PUBLIC INFORMATION ESF #15 II. PURPOSE Provide for the development, coordination and dissemination of emergency public information.
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN For FLORIDA OPERATIONAL AREA SEVEN
EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN For FLORIDA OPERATIONAL AREA SEVEN Approved 10/12/1999 Modified 3/5/2001 Change of Primary LP1 station from WMGF 107.7 FM to WPOZ 88.3 Modified 3/27/03 adding CAE (Amber) code
Georgia Emergency Operations Plan. Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management
Emergency Support Function # 5 Annex Emergency Management 2015 Emergency Support Function #5 E S F C o o r d i nator and Support Ag e n c i e s ESF C oordi na t or Georgia Emergency Management Agency/Homeland
Idaho State Alert & Warning System
ISAWS to the Idaho Bureau of Homeland Security s Idaho s mass notification and public warning system providing alerts and warnings to Idahoans in regard to emergency situations and disasters. ISAWSIntroduction
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020: PRIORITY ACTIONS
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020: PRIORITY ACTIONS INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to list the aligned with each in the Texas Homeland Security Strategic Plan 2015-2020 (THSSP).
Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. Emergency Alert System Survey
Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Emergency Alert System Survey Prepared on 6/24/2011 Introduction In July of 2010 the Minnesota Department of Public Safety,
Annex 4: Emergency Alert System Plan for Lewis County. Revised July 2013
Annex 4: Emergency Alert System Plan for Lewis County Revised July 2013 1 PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2 Table of Contents I. PURPOSE... 5 II. AUTHORITY... 5 III. OBJECTIVE... 5 IV. WHO CAN ACTIVATE THE
ANNEX B COMMUNICATIONS
ANNEX B COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL & IMPLEMENTATION Annex B Communications This emergency management plan is hereby approved. This plan is effective immediately and supersedes all previous editions. Jeff
Table of Contents ESF-3-1 034-00-13
Table of Contents Primary Coordinating Agency... 2 Local Supporting Agencies... 2 State, Regional, and Federal Agencies and Organizations... 3 Purpose... 3 Situations and Assumptions... 4 Direction and
Georgia Emergency Operations Plan. Emergency Support Function # 12 Annex Energy
Emergency Support Function # 12 Annex Energy 2015 E S F C o o r d i nator and Support Ag e n c i e s ESF C oordi na t or Georgia Environmental Finance Authority P rima ry Agenc y Georgia Department of
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Background/Overview and Process Briefing Homeland Security Preparedness Technical Assistance Program May 2012 PPD-8 Background A linking together of
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) INDEPENDENT STUDY COURSE INTRO TO INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM FOR FEDERAL WORKERS (IS-100.
This Study Guide has been created to provide an overview of the course content presented in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Independent Study Course titled IS-100.FWA Intro to Incident Command
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Discussion
1 Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Discussion IPAWS PMO in coordination with FEMA ODIC welcomes Key Industry and Federal Experts on Access and Functional Needs 2 FEMA IPAWS and ODIC Sponsors
ESF 12: Energy & Utilities
Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 1.3 ESF Activation & Plan Maintenance... 2 1.4 Policies... 2 2.0 Situation & Assumptions... 2 2.1 Situation... 2 2.2 Assumptions...
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. CONTENTS List of Tables...vii List of Figures...vii What Is the National Incident Management System?...1 PREFACE... 3 INTRODUCTION
ESF-3 COMMUNICATIONS AND WARNING
ESF-3 COMMUNICATIONS AND WARNING CONTENTS PAGE I. PURPOSE ESF 3.1 II. SITUATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS ESF 3.1 A. Situations ESF 3.1 B. Assumptions ESF 3.3 III. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS ESF 3.3 A. General ESF 3.3
MSRC Best Practices. Communications Infrastructure Security, Access & Restoration Working Group
MSRC Best Practices MEDIA SECURITY AND RELIABILITY COUNCIL Adopted Best Practices Recommendations Communications Infrastructure Security, Access & Restoration Working Group National Recommendations Prevention
National Continuity Programs Directorate Integrated Public Alert and Warning (IPAWS) Fiscal Year 2013
National Continuity Programs Directorate Integrated Public Alert and Warning (IPAWS) Fiscal Year 2013 Supplemental Guidance on Public Alert and Warning A Message to Stakeholders On behalf of the IPAWS
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Guide for Independent Testing of Emergency Alert System Equipment. June 2012
Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Guide for Independent Testing of Emergency Alert System Equipment June 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Specifications... 5 Scope... 6 Program
UNION COLLEGE SCHENECTADY, NY 12308 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
UNION COLLEGE SCHENECTADY, NY 12308 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES Departments involved in fulfilling the obligations of these Emergency Management Procedures include: President s Office (Executive Assistant
DEFINITIONS: Active shooter refers to an offender actively shooting causing death and great bodily harm to persons.
University of Wisconsin Madison Police Policy: 46.1 SUBJECT: CRITICAL INCIDENTS-UNIVERSITY RESPONSE PLAN EFFECTIVE DATE: 06/01/10 REVISED DATE: 11/01/14, 05/15/15 REVIEWED DATE: 06/01/12 INDEX: 46.1.1
The Critical Role of Broadcasting in Emergencies
The Critical Role of Broadcasting in Emergencies ITU-R WP 6A Workshop on Emergency Broadcasting Geneva, Switzerland 21 November, 2013 Craig K. Tanner Consultant, CBS Broadcasting, Inc. 1 There are some
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR HOSPITALS
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR HOSPITALS The following minimum criteria are to be used when developing Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) for all hospitals. These criteria will
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY MASTER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN Last Edit 2/8/2011 OVERVIEW This document provides a management framework for responding to incidents that may threaten the health and safety of
Table of Contents. St. Louis College of Pharmacy Emergency Notification System Guide
January 2015 Table of Contents I. Overview...2 A. Emergency Management Program Mission...2 B. Purpose...2 C. Emergency Notification System Description...2 D. Emergency Notification System Enrollment...2
Programming Guide. http://www.reecominc.com. Model: R-1630C
Programming Guide S.A.M.E Digital Weather / All Hazards Alert Radio CEA-2009-A Certified Alert Receiver Model: R-1630C Public Alert Certified Reecom Electronics Inc. http://www.reecominc.com Features:
University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
University of San Francisco EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN University of San Francisco Emergency Operations Plan Plan Contact Eric Giardini Director of Campus Resilience 415-422-4222 This plan complies with
Technology Infrastructure Services
LOB #303: DISASTER RECOVERY Technology Infrastructure Services Purpose Disaster Recovery (DR) for IT is a capability to restore enterprise-wide technology infrastructure, applications and data that are
Homeland Security Plan for Iowa State University Extension Field Offices
Homeland Security Plan for Iowa State University Extension Field Offices Homeland security covers natural disaster events such as a flood, drought, or winter storm, as well as terrorist events from a physical,
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (UCMAlert)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (UCMAlert) RESPONSIBLE OFFICER : Vice Chancellor - Administration EFFECTIVE DATE : REVISION NUMBER : Original NUMBER OF PAGES : 8 I. REFERENCES
State Mitigation Plan Review Guide. Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP 302-094-2
State Mitigation Plan Review Guide Released March 2015 Effective March 2016 FP 302-094-2 This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations... iii SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION...
Emergency Management is responsible for coordinating the City of Houston s preparation for and response to emergency situations.
CITY OF HOUSTON Office of Emergency Management October 2004 Emergency Management is responsible for coordinating the City of Houston s preparation for and response to emergency situations. Houston is exposed
UNION COLLEGE INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN
UNION COLLEGE INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAN The college is committed to supporting the safety and welfare of all its students, faculty, staff and visitors. It also consists of academic, research and other facilities,
December 18, 2008. Dear NIMS Stakeholders:
December 18, 2008 Dear NIMS Stakeholders: Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-5, Management of Domestic Incidents, directed the development and administration of the National Incident Management
Communications Systems Used in the USA TARNS. Chris Hill, Meteorologist in Charge (ret) National Weather Service Seattle, Washington, USA
Communications Systems Used in the USA TARNS Chris Hill, Meteorologist in Charge (ret) National Weather Service Seattle, Washington, USA Washington Faces Many Non-Weather Hazards Earthquakes Tsunamis Terrorism
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION PLAN
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION PLAN 2 Document Control Revision: 1 Date: 4 February 2014 Status: Document change control: Approved by EPC Revision # Change Description Date Author 1 Initial document release as
Emergency Management Certification and Training (EMC & T) Refresher Terry Hastings, DHSES Senior Policy Advisor
Emergency Management Certification and Training (EMC & T) Refresher Terry Hastings, DHSES Senior Policy Advisor 2015 NYSEMA Conference 2 Please sign in to ensure that you receive credit for the refresher
Continuity of Operations Plan Template
Continuity of Operations Plan Template Office of Water (4608-T) EPA 817-B-14-007 November 2014 Please note: The golden key sticky notes located throughout the template provide additional information and
Purpose of the Governor s strategy. Guiding Principles
Purpose of the Governor s strategy The Governor s initiative to develop and implement a State of Tennessee program to counter terrorism within the State is outlined in this document. The primary purpose
CHAPTER 33 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 33 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Section 33.01 Policy and Purpose 33.02 Definitions 33.03 Establishment of an Emergency Management Organization 33.04 Power and Duties of the Director 33.05 Local Emergencies
The Role of Elected Officials During Disasters. The Florida Division of Emergency Management
The Role of Elected Officials During Disasters The Florida Division of Emergency Management Bryan W. Koon Director Florida Division of Emergency Management Introduction Florida s elected officials play
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING CRITERIA FOR AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS The following criteria are to be used when developing Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) for all ambulatory surgical
Office of Emergency Management
Emergency Management Mission In cooperation with internal and external partners, enhance public protective actions and promote domestic preparedness through a comprehensive and effective emergency management
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (revised June 2012)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN (revised June 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 2 1. Objectives and Priorities 2. Review and Assessment Authority... 3 Supporting Documentation... 4 Key Terms and Roles...
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201 First Edition April 2012 Table of Contents Overview... 1 Basic Elements of the THIRA Process... 3
Final Exam for: IS-700.a: National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction
Final Exam for: IS-700.a: National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction Each time that this test is taken online, questions and answers are scrambled to protect the integrity of the exam Completion
BASIC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS. M a r y l a n d M a y o r s A s s o c i a t i o n. W i n t e r C o n f e r e n c e A n n a p o l i s
BASIC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS M a r y l a n d M a y o r s A s s o c i a t i o n W i n t e r C o n f e r e n c e A n n a p o l i s SPEAKERS Mayor Michael E. Bennett City of Aberdeen Mayor
Emergency Response Plan
Emergency Response Plan Public Version Contents INTRODUCTION... 4 SCOPE... 5 DEFINITION OF AN EMERGENCY... 5 AUTHORITY... 6 ACTION PRIOR TO DECLARATION... 6 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION & PRIVACY PROTECTION...
State of Hawaii. EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM (EAS) Plan. June 12, 2003
State of Hawaii EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM (EAS) Plan June 12, 2003 Change 1 dated Mar 31, 2004 Change 2 dated Oct 26, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... RECORD OF REVISIONS... PAGE i ii I. PURPOSE...
Ordinances Governing EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. in the CITY OF ARLINGTON TEXAS. Amended by Ordinance No. 87-149. (August 25, 1987)
Chapter Ordinances Governing EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT in the CITY OF ARLINGTON TEXAS Amended by Ordinance No. 87-149 (August 25, 1987) (Chapter Designator: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT) History ORDINANCE HISTORY Date
NEBRASKA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY
NEBRASKA STATE HOMELAND SECURITY STRATEGY 2014-2016 Nebraska Homeland Security Policy Group/Senior Advisory Council This document provides an overall framework for what the State of Nebraska hopes to achieve
DRAFT AFTER ACTION REPORT/IMPROVEMENT PLAN
f[note for Template: Text found in this document that is highlighted and bracketed is included to provide instruction or to indicate a location to input text. All text that is not highlighted is to be
Emergency Management Planning Criteria For Residential Treatment Facilities
Emergency Management Planning Criteria For Residential Treatment Facilities The following minimum criteria are to be used for Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) for Therapeutic Group Homes
National Emergency Communications Plan
National Emergency Communications Plan 2014 This page intentionally left blank. MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY Since the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was established in 2003, one of its top priorities
CEMP Criteria for Residential Treatment Facilities
CEMP Criteria for Residential Treatment Facilities Lee County Emergency Management The following minimum criteria are to be used when Comprehensive Emergency Management Plans (CEMP) for all Residential
Guide for Developing High- Quality Emergency Operations Plans for Houses of Worship
Guide for Developing High- Quality Emergency Operations Plans for Houses of Worship June 2013 Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose... 1 Planning Principles... 3 The Planning Process... 4 Step 1:
MAJOR PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS CHECKLIST
MAJOR PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS CHECKLIST The following checklist is provided as a guide to assure that relevant considerations are identified in the emergency management planning process. Use the blank
Citizen Corps Council Registration
Citizen Corps Council Registration Council Contact Information 1. Council name, area served, Council point of contact name, address, phone number, email Local Sponsoring Organization 2. Sponsoring Organization,
Cornell University EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Cornell University EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 Section 2 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMPONENTS... 3 Prevention-Mitigation Plan... 3 Preparedness
ICS for LAUSD EOC and DOC Operation
ICS for LAUSD EOC and DOC Operation Below is some background information on the Incident Command System (used at our schools and in other field operations) and how it applies in an EOC environment. From
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM PROTOCOLS
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION SYSTEM PROTOCOLS Annex B to Crisis and Emergency Management Plan Revision 2.0 October 2011 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Office of Emergency Management 248
Unit 4: NIMS Communications and Information Management
Unit 4: NIMS Communications and Information Management This page intentionally left blank. Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to: Describe the importance of communications and information
PART 2 LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEMS, LAWS, AND AUTHORITIES. Table of Contents
PART 2 LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEMS, LAWS, AND AUTHORITIES (Updates in Yellow Highlight) Table of Contents Authorities: Federal, State, Local... 2-1 UCSF s Emergency ManagemenT
EAS EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN
LOCAL EAS EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM PLAN EMERGENCY ALERT SYSTEM (EAS) CHECKLIST FOR BROADCAST STATIONS AND CABLE SYSTEMS #1 WWWY(FM), 106.1 MHz / #2 WHAS(AM), 840 khz South Central Indiana / or WAMZ(FM),
University of California San Francisco Emergency Response Management Plan PART 1 PART 1 OVERVIEW OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.
PART 1 OVERVIEW OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Table of Contents Introduction... 1-1 UCSF Description... 1-1 Relationship to local, state & federal emergency Mgt Agencies... 1-2 Emergency Management Model...
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Preparedness Standards for Emergency Management in Texas TDEM-100
Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management Preparedness Standards for Emergency Management in Texas June 2000 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Requests for additional copies of
NURSING HOME STATUE RULE CRITERIA
NURSING HOME STATUE RULE CRITERIA Page 1 of 11 Nursing Homes Statutory Reference 8 400.23 (2)(g), Florida Statutes Rules; criteria; Nursing Home Advisory Committee; evaluation and rating system; fee for
ANNEX A WARNING PROMULGATION STATEMENT
ANNEX A WARNING PROMULGATION STATEMENT Annex A: Warning, and contents within, is a guide to how the University issues warnings of emergency situations to the campus community. The Annex is written in support
BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLAN OVERVIEW
BUSINESS CONTINUITY PLAN OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide Loomis customers with an overview of the company s Business Continuity Plan (BCP). Because of the specific and
Unit 4: NIMS Communications and Information Management
Unit 4: NIMS Communications and Information Management This page intentionally left blank. Objectives At the end of this unit, the participants should be able to: Describe the importance of communications
