Standard Statement Data and System Security
|
|
|
- Donna White
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1.0 Purpose State of Arkansas Office of the State Executive Chief Information Officer 124 West Capitol Avenue Suite 200 Little Rock, AR Phone Fax Standard Statement Data and System Security Title: Data and System Security Classification Document Number: SS Effective Date: 5/15/2005 Published by: Office of the State ECIO This document presents a framework through which Arkansas agencies, boards, commissions, and institutions of higher education can classify data and systems across the two spectrums of (1) data sensitivity and (2) data and system criticality. Once data is classified by the agency or institution of higher education, then appropriate security measures can be applied. 2.0 Scope This standard statement applies to all state agencies, boards, commissions and institutions of higher education. 3.0 Background The Arkansas Information Systems Act of 1997 (Act 914, 1997) gives the Office of Information Technology the authority to define standards, policies and procedures to manage the information resources within the state. This is accomplished through work with a multi-agency working group known as the Shared Technical Architecture Team. In addition, Act 1042 of 2001 states that the Executive Chief Information Officer oversees the development of information technology security policy for state agencies. The State Security Office, under the state s Executive Chief Information Officer, defines an environment for strategic security architecture and sets security standards and policies for information technology in state government. In order to apply appropriate security measures, data must first be classified to determine its sensitivity and required availability. 4.0 References 4.1 Act 914 of 1997: Authorized the Office of Information Technology (OIT) to develop statewide policies. 4.2 Act 1042 of 2001: Authorized the Executive CIO to develop security policy. 5.0 Standard 5.1 Data owned and maintained by agencies shall be put into appropriate classification levels according to its sensitivity and criticality. Data security levels are as follows:
2 Data Sensitivity Levels LEVEL A - UNRESTRICTED Unrestricted data is characterized as being open public data with no distribution limitations and to which anonymous access is allowed. These data elements form information that is actively made publicly available by state government. It is published and distributed freely, without restriction. It is available in the form of physical documents such as brochures, formal statements, press releases, reports that are made freely available, and in electronic form such as internet web pages and bulletin boards accessible with anonymous access. The greatest security threat to this data is from unauthorized or unintentional alteration, distortion, or destruction of this data. Security efforts appropriate to the criticality of the system containing this data must be taken to maintain its integrity. Examples of data at this sensitivity level include many agency public websites. LEVEL B - SENSITIVE These data elements are the information that is made available through open records requests or other formal or legal processes. This category includes the majority of the data contained within the state government electronic databases. Direct access to this data is restricted to authenticated and authorized individuals who require access to that information in the course of performing their duties. Security threats to this data include unauthorized access, alteration and destruction concerns. Examples: Most data elements in state personnel records Building code violations data Driver history records Collective bargaining data Employment & training program data Federal contracts data Firearm permits data Historical records repository data Real estate appraisal data Occupational licensing data Personnel data LEVEL C - VERY SENSITIVE Data classified as being very sensitive is only available to internal authorized users and may be protected by federal and state regulations. Very sensitive data is intended for use only by individuals who require the information in the course of performing job functions. These data elements include those protected by federal and state statute or regulation. Access to these data elements is restricted to authenticated and authorized individuals who require access to that information in the course of performing their duties. These are the data elements removed from responses to information requests for reasons of privacy. Security threats to this data include violation of privacy statutes and regulations in addition to unauthorized alteration or destruction. If this data were accessed by unauthorized persons, it could cause financial loss or allow identity theft. Unauthorized disclosure could provide significant gain to a vendor s competitors. Examples:
3 Social Security numbers Most home addresses Attorneys files Comprehensive law enforcement data Domestic abuse data Educational records Foster care data Health and medical data Library borrower s records Signature imaging data Welfare records/data Credit card numbers Competitive bids Civil investigative data Criminal history data Economic development assistance data Food assistance programs data Head Start data Juvenile delinquent data Counselors data Trade secrets data LEVEL D - EXTREMELY SENSITIVE Data classified as being extremely sensitive is data whose disclosure or corruption could be hazardous to life or health. These data elements are the most sensitive to integrity and confidentiality risks. Access is tightly restricted with the most stringent security safeguards at the system as well as the user level. Failure to maintain the integrity and confidentiality could have severe financial, health or safety repercussions. Very strict rules must be adhered to in the usage of this data. Examples of this data include the contents of state law enforcement investigative records and communications systems. 5.2 Data and systems should be put into appropriate classification levels according to their criticality. The levels of criticality and their descriptions are as follows: Criticality Levels LEVEL 1 NOT CRITICAL These data and systems are necessary to state government but short-term interruption or unavailability is acceptable. They do not play any role in the scheme of the health, security, or safety of Arkansas citizens. LEVEL 2 CRITICAL These data and systems are required in order to administer functions within state government that need to be performed. Business continuity planning allows state government to continue operations in these areas within a certain period of time until the data and systems can be restored. LEVEL 3 EXTREMELY CRITICAL These data and systems are critical to public health or safety and must be protected by a vital plan that would allow resumption of operations within a very short timeframe. These data and systems also require restoration of the original facilities to be able to resume business. 6.0 Procedures Agencies and institutions of higher education should classify their data and systems according to the data and system classification standard and be able to demonstrate compliance. 7.0 Revision History Date Description of Change 5/15/2005 Original Standard Statement Published
4 8.0 Definitions 8.1 Data Data is information maintained in any form within state agencies or institutions of higher education. Any grouping of data is classified at the level of its most sensitive or critical data element. 8.2 System In this context, the term system is defined as a combination of hardware, software, and procedures necessary to support particular data. A server may have multiple systems and a system may require multiple servers. 9.0 Related Resources 9.1 COBIT Standards: Inquiries Direct inquiries about this standard to: Office of Information Technology Shared Technical Architecture 124 West Capitol Avenue Suite 200, Little Rock, Arkansas Phone: FAX: [email protected] OIT policies can be found on the Internet at: Attachment Data Sensitivity and System Criticality Grid The following grid allows agencies to classify data and systems at the same time for criticality and sensitivity.
5 Rows Represent Data Sensitivity Columns Represent System Criticality LEVEL 1 - NOT CRITICAL Necessary to state government but short-term interruption of service acceptable. These systems do not play any role in the scheme of health, security, safety of the citizens, etc. They could be easily offset with manual procedures. LEVEL 2 - CRITICAL Required to perform a critical service of state government: These systems will be required in order to administer functions within state government that need to be performed. Business continuity planning allows state government to continue operations in these areas within a certain period of time until the system can be restored. LEVEL 3 - EXTREMELY CRITICAL Critical to health or safety: These systems must be protected by a vital plan that would allow resumption of operations within a very short timeframe. It also requires the ability to be able to resume business. LEVEL A - UNRESTRICTED Open public data with no distribution limitations, anonymous access. May be anonymous access via electronic sources. (See Appendix A for expanded definition.) Examples: Arkansas.gov website, ADEQ website, and other state agency public websites LEVEL B - SENSITIVE Public data with limited availability, but which requires a special application to be completed or special processing to be done prior to access (for example, to redact sensitive data elements). Examples: Most data elements in the state personnel records, data elements in motor vehicle records not restricted by privacy regulations, and driver history records LEVEL C - VERY SENSITIVE Data only available to internal authorized users. May be protected by federal and state regulations. Intended for use only by individuals who require the information in the course of performing job functions. Examples: Social security numbers, credit card numbers, home addresses, and competitive bids LEVEL D - EXTREMELY SENSITIVE Data whose disclosure or corruption could be hazardous to life or health. Examples: Contents of state law enforcement investigative records and communications systems 1A 2A 3A 1B 2B 3B 1C 2C 3C 1D 2D 3D
Protecting Official Records as Evidence in the Cloud Environment. Anne Thurston
Protecting Official Records as Evidence in the Cloud Environment Anne Thurston Introduction In a cloud computing environment, government records are held in virtual storage. A service provider looks after
Information Security Program
Stephen F. Austin State University Information Security Program Revised: September 2014 2014 Table of Contents Overview... 1 Introduction... 1 Purpose... 1 Authority... 2 Scope... 2 Information Security
Rowan University Data Governance Policy
Rowan University Data Governance Policy Effective: January 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Regulations, Statutes, and Policies... 4 3. Policy Scope... 4 4. Governance Roles... 6 4.1. Data
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY Name Of : DPW Information Security and Privacy Policies Domain: Security Date Issued: 05/09/2011 Date Revised: 11/07/2013
Information Security Program Management Standard
State of California California Information Security Office Information Security Program Management Standard SIMM 5305-A September 2013 REVISION HISTORY REVISION DATE OF RELEASE OWNER SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Vulnerability Management Policy
Vulnerability Management Policy Policy Statement Computing devices storing the University s Sensitive Information (as defined below) or Mission-Critical computing devices (as defined below) must be fully
micros MICROS Systems, Inc. Enterprise Information Security Policy (MEIP) August, 2013 Revision 8.0 MICROS Systems, Inc. Version 8.
micros MICROS Systems, Inc. Enterprise Information Security Policy (MEIP) Revision 8.0 August, 2013 1 Table of Contents Overview /Standards: I. Information Security Policy/Standards Preface...5 I.1 Purpose....5
Information Resources Security Guidelines
Information Resources Security Guidelines 1. General These guidelines, under the authority of South Texas College Policy #4712- Information Resources Security, set forth the framework for a comprehensive
MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL AUDIT REPORT THOMAS H. MCTAVISH, C.P.A. AUDITOR GENERAL ...The auditor general shall conduct post audits of financial transactions and accounts of the state and of
CHAPTER 1 COMPUTER SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAM (CSIRT)
CHAPTER 1 COMPUTER SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE TEAM (CSIRT) PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to establish the roles, responsibilities, and communication procedures for the Computer Security Incident
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY STANDARDS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY STANDARDS Version 2.0 December 2013 Table of Contents 1 OVERVIEW 3 2 SCOPE 4 3 STRUCTURE 5 4 ASSET MANAGEMENT 6 5 HUMAN RESOURCES SECURITY 7 6 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL
University of Central Florida Class Specification Administrative and Professional. Information Security Officer
Information Security Officer Job Code: 2534 Serve as the information security officer for the University. Develop and computer security system standards, policies, and procedures. Serve as technical team
CITY OF SAN DIEGO ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION Number 95.51 PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY (PCI) COMPLIANCE POLICY. Page 1 of 9.
95.5 of 9. PURPOSE.. To establish a policy that outlines the requirements for compliance to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI-DSS). Compliance with this standard is a condition of
Computer Security Incident Reporting and Response Policy
SECTION: 3.8 SUBJECT: Computer Security Incident Reporting and Response Policy AUTHORITY: Executive Director; Chapter 282.318, Florida Statutes - Security of Data and Information Technology Resources;
2009 NASCIO Recognition Awards Nomination. A. Title: Sensitive Data Protection with Endpoint Encryption. Category: Information Security and Privacy
2009 NASCIO Recognition Awards Nomination A. Title: Sensitive Data Protection with Endpoint Encryption Category: Information Security and Privacy State: Ohio B. Executive Summary Protecting the confidentiality
Who Should Know This Policy 2 Definitions 2 Contacts 3 Procedures 3 Forms 5 Related Documents 5 Revision History 5 FAQs 5
Information Security Policy Type: Administrative Responsible Office: Office of Technology Services Initial Policy Approved: 09/30/2009 Current Revision Approved: 08/10/2015 Policy Statement and Purpose
Legislative Language
Legislative Language SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY AUTHORITY. Title II of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 121 et seq.) is amended (a) in section 201(c) by striking
ISO 27001 Controls and Objectives
ISO 27001 s and Objectives A.5 Security policy A.5.1 Information security policy Objective: To provide management direction and support for information security in accordance with business requirements
3Degrees Group, Inc. Privacy Policy
3Degrees Group, Inc. Privacy Policy Your privacy is important to 3Degrees Group, Inc. ( 3Degrees ). The following Privacy Policy discloses the information practices followed by 3Degrees with respect to
Office of the Auditor General Performance Audit Report. Statewide UNIX Security Controls Department of Technology, Management, and Budget
Office of the Auditor General Performance Audit Report Statewide UNIX Security Controls Department of Technology, Management, and Budget December 2015 State of Michigan Auditor General Doug A. Ringler,
Encryption Security Standard
Virginia Commonwealth University Information Security Standard Title: Encryption Security Standard Scope: Approval February 22, 2012 This document provides the encryption requirements for all data generated,
Network Security Policy
Network Security Policy I. PURPOSE Attacks and security incidents constitute a risk to the University's academic mission. The loss or corruption of data or unauthorized disclosure of information on campus
Ohio Supercomputer Center
Ohio Supercomputer Center IT Business Continuity Planning No: Effective: OSC-13 06/02/2009 Issued By: Kevin Wohlever Director of Supercomputer Operations Published By: Ohio Supercomputer Center Original
Domain 5 Information Security Governance and Risk Management
Domain 5 Information Security Governance and Risk Management Security Frameworks CobiT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology), developed by Information Systems Audit and Control Association
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM STANDARDS FOR SAFEGUARDING INFORMATION ATTACHMENT C
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM STANDARDS FOR SAFEGUARDING INFORMATION ATTACHMENT C This Attachment addresses the Contractor s responsibility for safeguarding Compliant Data and Business Sensitive Information
Utica College. Information Security Plan
Utica College Information Security Plan Author: James Farr (Information Security Officer) Version: 1.0 November 1 2012 Contents Introduction... 3 Scope... 3 Information Security Organization... 4 Roles
DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE SECURITY OVER PERSONAL INFORMATION. Report 2007-S-77 OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER
Thomas P. DiNapoli COMPTROLLER OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COMPTROLLER DIVISION OF STATE GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY Audit Objectives... 2 Audit Results - Summary... 2 Background... 2 Audit Findings...
CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION FORM
www.mpi.mb.ca CLASSIFICATION SPECIFICATION FORM Human Resources CLASSIFICATION TITLE: POSITION TITLE: (If different from above) DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: LOCATION: Executive Director Executive Director, Information
Office of Inspector General
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of Inspector General Security Weaknesses Increase Risks to Critical United States Secret Service Database (Redacted) Notice: The Department of Homeland Security,
Data Security Incident Response Plan. [Insert Organization Name]
Data Security Incident Response Plan Dated: [Month] & [Year] [Insert Organization Name] 1 Introduction Purpose This data security incident response plan provides the framework to respond to a security
HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES GENERALLY PROTECTED PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION BUT COULD IMPROVE CERTAIN INFORMATION SECURITY CONTROLS
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL HEALTH INSURANCE MARKETPLACES GENERALLY PROTECTED PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION BUT COULD IMPROVE CERTAIN INFORMATION SECURITY
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES SECURITY ARCHITECTURE POLICY. 03/27/09 Version
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES SECURITY ARCHITECTURE POLICY 03/27/09 Version Approved April 30, 2009 Approval of Enterprise Security Architecture Policy (03/27/2009 Version) Douglas G. Mack IT Security
Standards of. Conduct. Important Phone Number for Reporting Violations
Standards of Conduct It is the policy of Security Health Plan that all its business be conducted honestly, ethically, and with integrity. Security Health Plan s relationships with members, hospitals, clinics,
FINAL May 2005. Guideline on Security Systems for Safeguarding Customer Information
FINAL May 2005 Guideline on Security Systems for Safeguarding Customer Information Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Guideline 1 2 Definitions 2 3 Internal Controls and Procedures 2 3.1
GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING THIRD-PARTY RISK
GUIDANCE FOR MANAGING THIRD-PARTY RISK Introduction An institution s board of directors and senior management are ultimately responsible for managing activities conducted through third-party relationships,
Wellesley College Written Information Security Program
Wellesley College Written Information Security Program Introduction and Purpose Wellesley College developed this Written Information Security Program (the Program ) to protect Personal Information, as
MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JOB SPECIFICATION SERVICES SPECIALIST
JOB DESCRIPTION MICHIGAN CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION JOB SPECIFICATION SERVICES SPECIALIST Employees in this job complete and oversee a variety of professional assignments to provide services to socially
Contact: Henry Torres, (870) 972-3033
Information & Technology Services Management & Security Principles & Procedures Executive Summary Contact: Henry Torres, (870) 972-3033 Background: The Security Task Force began a review of all procedures
Privacy Impact Assessment of Automated Loan Examination Review Tool
Privacy Impact Assessment of Automated Loan Examination Review Tool Program or application name: Automated Loan Examination Review Tool (ALERT) System Owner: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
4.7 Website Privacy Policy
Policy Statement The is committed to ensuring that its departments, offices, agencies, boards, and commissions adhere to the privacy protection provisions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of
Standard Operating Procedure Information Security Compliance Requirements under the cabig Program
Page 1 of 9 Pages Standard Operating Procedure Information Security Compliance Requirements under the cabig Program This cover sheet controls the layout and components of the entire document. Issued Date:
How To Finance A Building Project
222 N. 32 nd Street, Suite 200 Billings, MT 59101 Phone (406) 869-8403 Fax (406) 256-6877 www.bigskyeda-edc.org RLF LOAN APPLICATION Operating Company Company Address City Zip Principal in charge Work
John Keel, CPA State Auditor Medicaid Fraud Control Activities at the Office of the Attorney General
John Keel, CPA State Auditor An Audit Report on Medicaid Fraud Control Activities at the Office of the Attorney General Report No. 08-040 An Audit Report on Medicaid Fraud Control Activities at the Office
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05-050
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 05-050 Adopting Multnomah County HIPAA Security Policies and Directing the Appointment of Information System Security
Index .700 FORMS - SAMPLE INCIDENT RESPONSE FORM.995 HISTORY
Information Security Section: General Operations Title: Information Security Number: 56.350 Index POLICY.100 POLICY STATEMENT.110 POLICY RATIONALE.120 AUTHORITY.130 APPROVAL AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICY.140
Data Management Policies. Sage ERP Online
Sage ERP Online Sage ERP Online Table of Contents 1.0 Server Backup and Restore Policy... 3 1.1 Objectives... 3 1.2 Scope... 3 1.3 Responsibilities... 3 1.4 Policy... 4 1.5 Policy Violation... 5 1.6 Communication...
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT. Chapter 7 Information Technology (IT) Security Program 270 FW 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS General Topics Purpose and Authorities Roles and Responsibilities Policy and Program Waiver Process Contact Abbreviated Sections/Questions 7.1 What is the purpose of this chapter? 7.2
ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SECURITY A.R.
A.R. Number: 2.6 Effective Date: 2/1/2009 Page: 1 of 7 I. PURPOSE In recognition of the critical role that electronic information systems play in City of Richmond (COR) business activities, this policy
Client Advisory October 2009. Data Security Law MGL Chapter 93H and 201 CMR 17.00
Client Advisory October 2009 Data Security Law MGL Chapter 93H and 201 CMR 17.00 For a discussion of these and other issues, please visit the update on our website at /law. To receive mailings via email,
FedRAMP Package Access Request Form For Review of FedRAMP Security Package
FedRAMP Package Access Request Form For Review of FedRAMP Security Package INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Please complete this form, then print and sign. 2. Distribute to your Government Supervisor for review and signature.
RUTGERS POLICY. Section Title: Legacy UMDNJ policies associated with Information Technology
RUTGERS POLICY Section: 70.2.20 Section Title: Legacy UMDNJ policies associated with Information Technology Policy Name: Information Security: Incident Management Formerly Book: 95-01-09-02:00 Approval
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT POLICY
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT POLICY Security Classification Level 4 - PUBLIC Version 1.3 Status APPROVED Approval SMT: 27 th April 2010 ISC: 28 th April 2010 Senate: 9 th June 2010 Council: 23 rd June
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY PLAN
BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY PLAN FEBRUARY 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE... 4 SCOPE... 4 INTRODUCTION... 4 SECTION 1: IT Security Policy... 5 SECTION 2: Risk Management
University of Liverpool
University of Liverpool Information Security Policy Reference Number Title CSD-003 Information Security Policy Version Number 3.0 Document Status Document Classification Active Open Effective Date 01 October
MONTSERRAT COLLEGE OF ART WRITTEN INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY (WISP)
MONTSERRAT COLLEGE OF ART WRITTEN INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY (WISP) 201 CMR 17.00 Standards for the Protection of Personal Information Of Residents of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Revised April 28,
Small Business Environmental Loan Program Application
Small Business Environmental Loan Program Application Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Public Outreach & Assistance Division Business Assistance Program 5301 Northshore Drive North Little Rock,
OVERVIEW. In all, this report makes recommendations in 14 areas, such as. Page iii
The Office of the Auditor General has conducted a procedural review of the State Data Center (Data Center), a part of the Arizona Strategic Enterprise Technology (ASET) Division within the Arizona Department
Marist College. Information Security Policy
Marist College Information Security Policy February 2005 INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE OF INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY... 3 INFORMATION SECURITY - DEFINITION... 4 APPLICABILITY... 4 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1. Administrative Safeguards...
State of Florida ELECTRONIC RECORDKEEPING STRATEGIC PLAN. January 2010 December 2012 DECEMBER 31, 2009
State of Florida ELECTRONIC RECORDKEEPING STRATEGIC PLAN January 2010 December 2012 DECEMBER 31, 2009 Florida Department of State State Library and Archives of Florida 850.245.6750 http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/recordsmanagers
KRS Chapter 61. Personal Information Security and Breach Investigations
KRS Chapter 61 Personal Information Security and Breach Investigations.931 Definitions for KRS 61.931 to 61.934. (Effective January 1, 2015).932 Personal information security and breach investigation procedures
Fraud Policy FEBRUARY 2014
Fraud Policy FEBRUARY 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Application of Policy... 2 2. Purpose of Policy... 2 3. Fraud Policy... 2 4. Definition of Fraud... 2 5. Duties and Responsibilities of an Employee or Contractor...
NSW Government Digital Information Security Policy
NSW Government Digital Information Security Policy Version: 2.0 Date: April 2015 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY... 3 1.1 Scope... 3 1.2 Application... 3 1.3 Objectives... 3 PART 2 POLICY STATEMENT... 4 Core
HIPAA COMPLIANCE AND DATA PROTECTION. [email protected] +39 030 201.08.25 Page 1
HIPAA COMPLIANCE AND DATA PROTECTION [email protected] +39 030 201.08.25 Page 1 CONTENTS Introduction..... 3 The HIPAA Security Rule... 4 The HIPAA Omnibus Rule... 6 HIPAA Compliance and EagleHeaps
APHIS INTERNET USE AND SECURITY POLICY
United States Department of Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Programs Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Directive APHIS 3140.3 5/26/2000 APHIS INTERNET USE AND SECURITY POLICY 1. PURPOSE This
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY
PURPOSE The University of Rochester recognizes the vital role information technology plays in the University s missions and related administrative activities as well as the importance in an academic environment
CHAPTER 2016-138. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1033
CHAPTER 2016-138 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1033 An act relating to information technology security; amending s. 20.61, F.S.; revising the
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Title: Computer and Network Security Policy Policy Number: 04.72.12 Effective Date: November 4, 2003 Issuing Authority: Office of the Vice President for
Recommendations for the PIA. Process for Enterprise Services Bus. Development
Recommendations for the PIA Process for Enterprise Services Bus Development A Report by the Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee This report reflects the consensus recommendations provided by
Hengtian Information Security White Paper
Hengtian Information Security White Paper March, 2012 Contents Overview... 1 1. Security Policy... 2 2. Organization of information security... 2 3. Asset management... 3 4. Human Resources Security...
Protecting Personal Information: The Massachusetts Data Security Regulation (201 CMR 17.00)
Protecting Personal Information: The Massachusetts Data Security Regulation (201 CMR 17.00) May 15, 2009 LLP US Information Security Framework Historically industry-specific HIPAA Fair Credit Reporting
Information Technology Cyber Security Policy
Information Technology Cyber Security Policy (Insert Name of Organization) SAMPLE TEMPLATE Organizations are encouraged to develop their own policy and procedures from the information enclosed. Please
Privacy Impact Assessment. For. Non-GFE for Remote Access. Date: May 26, 2015. Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray michael.gray@ed.
For Non-GFE for Remote Access Date: May 26, 2015 Point of Contact and Author: Michael Gray [email protected] System Owner: Allen Hill [email protected] Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Directive Concerning the Colorado Judicial Department Electronic Communications Usage Policy: Technical, Security, And System Management Concerns This
Information Security Policy and Handbook Overview. ITSS Information Security June 2015
Information Security Policy and Handbook Overview ITSS Information Security June 2015 Information Security Policy Control Hierarchy System and Campus Information Security Policies UNT System Information
Wright State University Information Security
Wright State University Information Security Controls Policy Title: Category: Audience: Reason for Revision: Information Security Framework Information Technology WSU Faculty and Staff N/A Created / Modified
INFORMATION SECURITY AT THE HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NEEDS IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE CONTROLS WERE NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED AND MONITORED
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL INFORMATION SECURITY AT THE HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NEEDS IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE CONTROLS WERE NOT FULLY IMPLEMENTED
Legislative Language
Legislative Language SEC. 1. COORDINATION OF FEDERAL INFORMATION SECURITY POLICY. (a) IN GENERAL. Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by striking subchapters II and III and inserting
HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 HIPAA
TRAINING MANUAL HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996 HIPAA Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 What is HIPAA? Privacy Security Transactions and Code Sets What is covered ADMINISTRATIVE
SAFEGUARDS FOR PROTECTING PRIVATE DATA - SERVICE PROVIDERS AND CONTRACTORS
SAFEGUARDS FOR PROTECTING PRIVATE DATA - SERVICE PROVIDERS AND CONTRACTORS THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO October 17, 2013 Audit Committee Members J.E. Gene Gallegos, Chair Lt. General Bradley Hosmer, Vice
ISO27001 Controls and Objectives
Introduction This reference document for the University of Birmingham lists the control objectives, specific controls and background information, as given in Annex A to ISO/IEC 27001:2005. As such, the
IDIM Privacy Enhancing Features Summary Identity Information Management Project (IDIM) Integration Infrastructure Program (IIP) Office of the CIO
IDIM Privacy Enhancing Features Summary Identity Information Management Project (IDIM) Integration Infrastructure Program (IIP) Contact: Peter Watkins Phone: 250 387-2184 Email: [email protected]
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Version 1c
INFORMATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Version 1c Revised April 2011 CONTENTS Introduction... 5 1 Security Policy... 7 1.1 Information Security Policy... 7 1.2 Scope 2 Security Organisation... 8 2.1 Information
Information Security: Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification. Technology Services 1/4/2013
Information Security: Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification Technology Services 1/4/2013 Roles, Responsibilities, and Data Classification The purpose of this session is to: Establish that all
Cloud Computing: Legal Risks and Best Practices
Cloud Computing: Legal Risks and Best Practices A Bennett Jones Presentation Toronto, Ontario Lisa Abe-Oldenburg, Partner Bennett Jones LLP November 7, 2012 Introduction Security and Data Privacy Recent
Valdosta Technical College. Information Security Plan
Valdosta Technical College Information Security 4.4.2 VTC Information Security Description: The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires financial institutions as defined by the Federal Trade Commision to protect
Appendix A: Rules of Behavior for VA Employees
Appendix A: Rules of Behavior for VA Employees Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Rules of Behavior 1 Background a) Section 5723(b)(12) of title 38, United States Code, requires the Assistant
