3D models and IPR based on the experiences of the 3D-ICONS Project

Transcription

1 3D models and IPR based on the experiences of the 3D-ICONS Project Sheena Bassett, Project Manager MDR Partners This project has been funded with support from the European Commission s CIP ICT PSP programme 1

2 3D ICONS & IPR -Overview About the 3D-ICONS Project The 3D-ICONS Approach Process definition IPR Considerations The Europeana DEA Creative Commons CARARE 2.0 Schema IANUS & DARIAH-DE Workshop, Berlin 2 nd -3 rd September

3 About the 3D-ICONS Project Three year Best Practice Network To supply approx. 3,000 3D models of iconic monuments and buildings to Europeana Develop a process pipeline to cover digitisation to publication of 3D models and address IPR management. 19 partners, 17 content providers, one technology provider and MDR Partners for project management and dissemination. Started February Challenges have included: Definitions small and large models, entities, details IPR (signature of DEA, agreement with authorities) Publication formats technology developments 3

4 3D-Models: IPR Attitudes Partners are supplying content from UK, France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Belgium, Romania, Ireland and Cyprus. Many own existing digital models New digitisation happening. Authorities attitudes vary from refusal of permission to enthusiastic promotion. Some partners have had protracted discussions with rights owners regarding the existing data and derivative models. Owners of data which may have intrinsic value to them as rights holders. IPR policies can be legacy. Other national authorities who see 3D as a good way to promote interest in cultural heritage and increase tourism. Authorities under economic pressure 4

5 The 3D-ICONS Approach Default IPR position for 3D models is BY-NC-ND. This licence is the most restrictive of our six main licences, only allowing others to download your works and share them with others as long as they credit you, but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially. 30%-40% partners now using CC for managing their IPR. Publication formats and IPR protection Security loophole in 3D-PDF Looking at HTML5/WebGL, UNREAL and Unity3D also. Nexus: Takes original hi-res model and renders WebGLon screen. Converted files stored on owner s server. Technologies offer some protection but nothing is hacker-proof. 5

6 30/08/2013 6

7 7

8 Content IPR to be considered Content to be provided for Europeana 3D models in suitable publication format Metadata to be provided to Europeana Covered by the Data Exchange Agreement Metadata not provided to Europeana CARARE 2.0 Schema much richer than EDM Content to be provided to a 3D-ICONS portal Under discussion More complex models/data Richer metadata No conflict with Europeana 8

9 Europeana Data Exchange Agreement Europeana uses Creative Commons Licenses for metadata Metadata supplied to Europeana is covered by the CC0 Licence New content providers sometimes get confused by the DEA To summarise the DEA conditions: All content suppliers have total control over the metadata supplied to Europeana (and thumbnail images - optional) Suppliers can request to have metadata withdrawn Suppliers have absolute control over the content (URL). The metadata is designed to facilitate search and retrieval Metadata may be used in 3 rd party apps (e.g. geo-locations). 9

10 Example of Geo-location data in use: What is Where? rare50m/map.html Maps the geo-location (physical position) recorded for each item supplied by CARARE to Europeana. IPR: NL do not supply locations of marine wrecks. 10

11 CARARE 2.0 Metadata Schema Developed in the CARARE project as a rich schema for archaeological domain Based on existing standards with some additions (MIDAS, LIDO) Used for 3D models provided by CARARE (~ 50 3D-PDFs). CARARE 2.0 extended model to cover specific requirements of 3D models Provenance (London Charter paradata) e.g. digitisation and processing methods, equipment used, datasets ) Mapped to EDM in MINT tool and ingested via MoRE. 11

12 CARARE 2.0 IPR Statements Specifies: Rights for whole collections Rights associated with the Heritage Asset, Rights associated with the digital object itself (copyright, access rights, reproduction rights) Rights for the metadata. Note that Metadata mapped to the EDM is covered by the DEA and is CC0. 12

13 CARARE 2.0 IPR Statements in Detail 1) Collection information Rights associated with the collection as a whole. 2) Heritage Asset Identification Set Record Information -Basic administrative information about the record. The information includes: Metadata Rights statement about any rights to the metadata, include a link to a licence online if appropriate. Rights(source = DC) a statement of any rights associated with the heritage asset. References these are sources of information about the heritage asset in publications and archival sources (for example, bibliographic references etc.). Source = MIDAS + DCMI Terms. The information includes: Rights (source = MIDAS) (Global) 13

14 CARARE 2.0 IPR Statements in Detail Cont d 3) Digital Resource Rights (source = MIDAS) (Global) the rights associated with the digital object itself. The is information about the rights associated with the object, metadata and the digital surrogate being harvested into the service environment based on MIDAS Heritage. The information includes: Copyright credit line rights holder and rights dates Access rights access rights to the content. Reproduction rights reproduction rights including contact information License a URI indicating a license or conditions for the use of the object or data, Europeana Rights one of the 12 rights statements used by Europeana in its portal. Required for content being provided to Europeana. 14

15 Mappings to EDM The current mappings for IPR expressions in EDM can be summarised as follows: 1) Provided Cultural Heritage Object e.g. Mona Lisa painting dc:rights(optional) 2) ORE Aggregation Cultural Heritage Object edm:rights(mandatory) = URI 3) Web Resource (digital object) dc:rights(optional) edm:rights(optional) = URI. 15

16 ESE/EDM Metadata Schema Rights statements (DC: Rights) are either encoded as literal statements or as URLs referring to web pages that contain information about the applicable rights. The web pages inform the user about the terms under which the digital object and the corresponding preview can be used. Europeanauses 12 different Creative Commons rights statements in total which define the type of access and use allowed or not. (Currently used for sorting by Copyright). Source: 16

17 3D-ICONS IPR Scheme Deliverable 7.2 Report on IPR Scheme (PDF) can be downloaded from the 3D-ICIONS website at: 17

18 Any questions? 18