Telefónica response to the consultation on the implementation of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive
|
|
- Beatrice Pierce
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ID REGISTER: Telef05162 Telefónica response to the consultation on the implementation of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive Telefónica welcomes the opportunity to comment on the findings of the evaluation report on the implementation of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), and the accompanying staff working document. The issue of intellectual property is an important element in the present and future European economy, and it is important for creators and consumers to get the balance between protection and access correct, particularly in the online environment. Telefónica is present in 6 EU Member States (Spain, Germany, Ireland, UK, Czech Republic and Slovakia) and is one of the world's largest integrated telecommunications companies, offering fixed, mobile, broadband and TV services across 25 key markets in 3 continents (Europe, Latin America and Asia). Depending on each country, Telefónica s operations offer a wide variety of digital multimedia content (audiovisual and musical) services across different platforms and/or distribution means, including mobile portals and applications, DSL connectivity, IP-TV, Internet Portals, and as such it is an important commercial user of intellectual property rights. Telefónica has grown in scale to become a global telecom company whilst remaining European based and committed to the ongoing success of the Information Society in Europe. General Points Telefónica supports the need for creativity to be fostered and for creators of content to be encouraged in a sustainable manner, in order to nurture European cultural diversity and access for consumers to attractive content wherever they desire. As a provider of content as well as connectivity, Telefónica is willing to play its proper part in the debate. This requires a holistic approach to the issue of content creation, consumption and protection. However, the focus in the evaluation report is on eradicating IPR infringement, particularly that caused by the Internet. The report examines the issue in too one- 1
2 dimensional a way, searching for a cure to the perceived effects of Internet piracy rather than finding a way to remove the incentives for illegal downloading in the first place. For Telefónica, finding new ways of offering content in an attractive way to European customers is the only sustainable long term solution. This requires a more global approach, working on fostering access to legal content and not just on limiting consumer action (and choice). Telefónica therefore welcomes the approach taken by the Commission in the Single Market Act 1, where an overall IPR strategy is planned. This should balance the several elements needed to create a sustainable market for creative content. One important element is reform of the licensing regime, in order to allow more competition among collective rights managers, easier licensing regimes and more flexibility for commercial users, and more possibilities for consumers to access content across the Single Market. Telefónica hopes that the forthcoming proposals on Collective Rights Management reflect these principles. Particularly, Telefónica would ask the European Commission to focus its efforts on improving the current reciprocal agreements to enable the collecting societies to grant multi-territory and multi-repertoire licenses as the best way to protect rightsholders whilst, at the same time, strengthening cultural diversity and fostering competition across Europe. It should also be emphasised that IPRED covers counterfeiting and piracy in the same way using the same tools, an approach which leads to confusion about the scope, methods and aims in this area. Counterfeiting of goods could be a criminal act, as serious implications for the health and safety of consumers could be involved, and is normally undertaken within an organised criminal context. Illicit sharing of content in breach of third parties IPR could be also a criminal act but is not usually considered as such but as a civil infringement, and so requires a different approach to that taken for counterfeiting. There is risk otherwise that neither activity is correctly addressed. Pursuing only a punitive approach for illicit filesharing will not solve the problem. The recent developments in France with the HADOPI law have shown that over 50% of users are not going to change their behaviour as a result of the law 2, knowing that technology 1 Proposal No 1: The European Parliament and the Council should take the necessary steps to adopt the proposals for the EU patent.. The aim is for the first EU patents to be issued in 2014 Proposal No 2: In 2011 the Commission will submit a proposal for a framework Directive on the management of copyrights, with the aim of opening up access to online content by improving the governance, transparency and electronic management of copyright. The Commission will also be proposing a Directive on orphan works. Proposal No 3: In 2010 the Commission will propose an action plan against counterfeiting and piracy, including both legislative and non-legislative measures. Furthermore, in 2011 it will make legislative proposals, in particular to adjust the legislative framework to meet the needs generated by the development of the Internet and to enhance customs work in this area, and it will re-examine its strategy on the implementation of intellectual property rights in third countries
3 tends to outpace legislation in this field. Nearly 60% also found that this kind of regime carries a threat to personal freedoms. Furthermore, studies have also shown that often those engaged in filesharing also spend significantly more on legal content than others 3. This highlights the importance of incentivising new business models to attract such consumers away from illicit sources 4. Telefónica believes that the current legal framework around ISP s liability is sufficient to protect the different rights and interests of actors in the new digital ecosystem. The limits on liability as laid down in the ecommerce Directive have been fundamental to the growth of the Internet and its associated services, as it allowed users to communicate in confidence (see our response to the consultation on the ecommerce Directive: content/uploads/2011/01/telefónica-e-commerce-consultation-response pdf). Comments on the evaluation report COM (2010) 779 IPRED has taken a long time to implement at the national level, and as such Telefónica businesses have had little experience with the provisions therein. The report states itself that the Commission has not been able to conduct a critical economic analysis of the impact that the Directive has had on innovation and on development of the information society. The staff working paper elaborates: [I]t was not possible to make a clear assessment of the implications the Directive has had on innovation and the development of the information society. Cyprus, France, Luxembourg, Malta, the Slovak Republic and the UK have provided reports with particularly limited information. As a result, the Commission has not been able to engage in a critical economic analysis of the effects that this Directive may have had on innovation and the development of the information society. (p27-8, Annex 1) The importance of incentivising new business models is emphasised in the UK s approach under the Digital Economy Act. 3
4 Given the important aims contained in IPRED, it is important that any revision of the Directive should be based on a solid evidence-based analysis of its impacts. The report carries no such quantitative analysis, which should be the first step in any revision of legislation if a proportionate solution is to be found. The evaluation concentrates overwhelmingly on the situation of rights holders and their difficulties in providing evidence which meets national legal standards, or the obstacles to their rights of information placed by European rules on data protection rather than suggesting ex ante measures such as new business models and educational programmes. This is not a balanced view of the situation, and should be corrected in follow up analysis and impact assessment. The Commission s lack of concrete evidence of the effects of IPRED could be addressed with more consultation and further observation of the national situations as they are allowed more time to develop. The role of the Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy may be helpful here, but only if it is composed in the correct fashion. The Observatory is mentioned as an important contributor to the analysis carried out on IPRED, particularly in the light of poor or non-existent information from Member States. However, the subgroups are currently open only to rightsholders organisations, with no representation from intermediaries such as ISPs or telecoms operators. If intermediaries are seen by the Commission and rightsholders as important in resolving the situation, then they should also be a part of the discussion of the problem. Telefónica also would like the focus of the revision to be widened, in line with the upcoming IPR strategy. Merely finding more effective ways to monitor and punish consumers for IPR infringements will not work, as there is a deeper underlying cause to this behaviour which needs to be more fully investigated. File-sharing of copyrightprotected content has become ubiquitous, partly because the development of legal offers of digital content has not been able to keep up with demand, especially on a cross-border basis, and has led many law-abiding citizens to commit massive infringements of copyright and related rights in the form of illegal up-loading and disseminating protected content. (p6) Telefónica would recommend that the Commission examine the root causes of this activity, which is hinted at here, rather than continuing to pursue the stick of enforcement of IPR infringement as the only tool. As the report itself mentions, currently available legislative and non-legislative instruments are not powerful enough to combat online infringements of intellectual property rights effectively, and while Telefónica is willing to play its proper part in reducing this phenomenon, we have seen that focusing solely on the enforcement of IPR leads to cumbersome solutions which eventually prove ineffective 5. Telefónica is convinced that it is more effective to 5 Worth mentioning is the example of the Czech Republic, where one of Telefónica s operative branches is situated. Telefónica O2 CZ s IPTV (TV broadcasting via IP protocol) business suffers from illicit downloading of movies. In the Czech Copyright Act, there have been introduced specific provisions on 4
5 anticipate consumer needs, offering them the maximum flexibility of choice. The changes in the digital environment create more of an opportunity for content owners than a threat, considering the new customers behaviour and expectations which need to be addressed by all stakeholders by developing new business models. Intermediaries (like ISPs) and rights holders need to work together to develop new services offering customers a wide range of legal offers with the content they want, how they want and for a fair price (growing consumption, new requirements and shift among platforms). Content owners should be more willing to enter in serious negotiations with the actors in the distribution chain (intermediaries) to allow online content distribution to adapt and respond to consumers needs. Content owners have the shared responsibility to conclude commercial agreements with intermediaries with the aim of putting legal offers in the market that suit end users demands. The report also mentions the possibility of re-balancing the right of information with the right to privacy. Intermediaries such as Telefónica are pulled in two different directions by the laws in place, confusing the situation and limiting the scope for voluntary action. Our role is currently defined clearly in the various relevant Directives (ecommerce, Data Protection, eprivacy, IPRED), and changing this via just one Directive risks toppling the balance reached in those other laws. In this respect, Telefónica supports the Commission`s proposal of developing a cooperational framework between the intermediaries and the judicial authorities within the European Union for the prevention and persecution of copyright infringements, provided that such collaboration does not undermine the liability protections for intermediaries established in the ecommerce Directive and of the legal restrictions established in the national legislations, including but not limited to privacy and data protection legislation. In this sense, the IPRED Directive provides for the right of information not only in the context of judicial proceedings;however, some Member States have gone beyond the Directive and provide for the right of information even before the formal judicial proceedings, as a provisional measure. In Telefónica s opinion we have to be very cautious when internet service providers are required, as a provisional measure, to provide some information on personal data (e.g. IP address). We believe that a prior judicial order is necessary when providing personal data. In this sense we give an example of how Spain and Germany are dealing with this issue. In Germany, the intervention of a Judge is always necessary in all cases. In Spain, the SINDE law (which came into force on 6 th Mach 2011) specifies that the responsible authorities rightholders protection (Section 40 of the Copyright Act) based on the IPRED. We have been requested by our partners (rightholders) for information, who might be the persons violating the law to the largest extent, and have provided this to our partners. So far, we have no evidence, that the rightholders would take any real steps in order to enforece their rights under these provisions of the Copyright Act. 5
6 may require providers of information society services to provide the necessary data to identify the infringers of IPR. However, the prior authorization of a judge is necessary to execute the measures adopted by the administration since these measures could violate fundamental rights and freedoms. Telefónica is in favour of the Commission`s proposal of establishing a neutral legal framework within the Member States legislations in which the right of information and the right to privacy are balanced but always provided that the achievement of these provisional measures do not introduce obligations for the intermediaries such as monitoring, detecting or preventing unlawful activities which conflict with the aim of the e-commerce Directive which states that the activity of the information society service provider is of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature which implies that the information society service provider has neither knowledge of nor control over the information which is transmitted or stored.. (Recital 42) Moreover, Telefónica also considers it necessary to recall that for achieving such a balance we have to take into consideration important fundamental rights involved, like the right of due process, freedom of expression and privacy and data protection, which could be at risk if measures are imposed without prior court orders. On the other hand, the accompanying working document to the Report makes reference to other tools as comprehensive notice and take down procedures that allow a timely elimination of illegal offers. Regarding the Private Notices, internet service providers may become liable for damages if they acquire actual knowledge or become aware of unlawful activities carried out by users of their servers. In principle, they could obtain such knowledge or awareness from private notices sent by interested third parties alerting them of the existence of the unlawful material. This kind of measure has created a liability regime which places upon on-line intermediaries the burden of deciding whether or not to remove suspicious material and thus the freedom of expression may be severely hindered. Telefónica believes that a legal system should neither permit nor encourage online intermediaries to indiscriminately eliminate any material from the Internet upon receipt of any notice from third parties, which often are not properly verified, and can be subjective or even opportunistic. This situation will unduly threaten freedom of expression and fair competition. Fundamental rights, like the right to due process, the protection of personal data and the freedom of expression, could be seriously threatened if the Directive is amended to introduce any obligation on intermediaries to act only on the request of private agents. In this regard, Telefónica believes that the revision of the Directive should be aimed to reconcile Intellectual Property Rights with Fundamental Rights, in a way than the 6
7 established legal instruments are able to offer the essential legal guaranties customaries in a rule of law. Injunctions Telefónica s experience with injunctions has been limited given the short time in which IPRED has been transposed in Member States, where Telefónica is active. We naturally comply with orders imposed from a court in line with national law, and see this step as crucial in the process, particularly when users personal data is concerned. We see that there is variation among Member States in their use of injunctions, and further harmonisation would clarify the situation for all concerned. However, this harmonisation should not change the current checks and balances in national laws. We would also be very concerned if the revision of IPRED led to a harmonisation of definitions that led to all infringements being seen as somehow commercial in scale, as this would be not proportionate to the problem being addressed. Conclusions In brief, regarding the issue of intellectual property rights, Telefónica is fully aware of how important the protection of copyright is to encourage the creativity and the development of powerful content for online use and trade. While Telefónica is fully engaged with achieving this goal, we firmly believe that punitive approaches will not provide any positive outcomes if they do not go hand in hand with other actions: to remove obstacles and competition problems in the current copyright management system, to allow new business models to develop and to promote information and educational campaigns to foster the cross-border trade of content in digital environments. To achieve that, rights holders should co-operate with other agents in the ecosystem in offering innovative and interesting legal ways to access their contents. Electronic communications operators, information services providers and rights holders are and should remain in a position to develop agreements on a bilateral basis as part of commercial negotiations. In the digital age, the development of new business models makes possible that customers can enjoy content in a way which ensures creators are rewarded. The market, more than ill-fitting enforcement, will meet consumers needs: the right to privacy, the right to choice and cultural diversity, demand for secure and user-friendly services and demand for high 7
8 quality content and a fair price. Content providers have a critical role in order to foster legal online content distribution responding to consumers demands. In addition and in Telefónica s opinion, voluntary cooperation between ISPs and rightsholders must by definition take place within the limits of the existing legal European framework, in particular, respecting Fundamental Rights to Privacy and also within the limits of national laws on civil and criminal proceedings. We believe that the current wording of the ecommerce Directive is and continues to be enough to deal with the question of liabilities, allowing national regulation to deal with the detail which best accommodates European law, fundamental rights and national legal structures. From the experience in the law and court practices in the countries in which Telefónica runs its operations, no serious problems have arisen in the interpretations of these concepts. March
ETNO Reflection Document on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the e-commerce Directive
ETNO Reflection Document on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the e-commerce Directive November 2010 Executive Summary ETNO welcomes the European Commission
More informationOnline Copyright Infringement. Discussion Paper
Online Copyright Infringement Discussion Paper July 2014 Introduction There are a number of factors that contribute to online copyright infringement in Australia. These factors include the availability
More informationA clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries
A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries Questions marked with an asterisk * require an answer to be given.
More information25 May 2015 EK VIEWS ON THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET STRATEGY The Commission published on 6 May A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. The strategy sets out 16 key actions under three pillars which
More informationAugust 21, 2013. United States Patent and Trademark Office Docket No. PTO-C-2013-0036 Voluntary Best Practices Study
United States Patent and Trademark Office Docket No. PTO-C-2013-0036 Voluntary Best Practices Study August 21, 2013 The Copyright Alliance is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(4) membership organization
More informationBPI response to the Draft Ofcom Annual Plan 2013-14
BPI response to the Draft Ofcom Annual Plan 2013-14 Introduction 1. BPI welcomes the opportunity to comment on the planned work of Ofcom in the year 2013-14. BPI will contain its comments to those aspects
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.12.2015 COM(2015) 627 final 2015/0284 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on ensuring the cross-border portability of online content
More informationDRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN 2014/2151(INI) 5.2.2015
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2014-2019 Committee on Legal Affairs 2014/2151(INI) 5.2.2015 DRAFT REPORT on Towards a renewed consensus on the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: An EU Action Plan (2014/2151(INI))
More information(DRAFT)( 2 ) MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
05 Motions for resolutions, and other B8 documents 05_09. Motions to wind up debate on statements by other institutions: Rule 123(2) Cover page EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2014 2019 Plenary sitting [.2014] B[8-/2014](
More informationEDRi s. January 2015. European Digital Rights Rue Belliard 20, 1040 Brussels www.edri.org @EDRi tel. +32 (0) 2 274 25 70
EDRi s Red lines on TTIP January 2015 European Digital Rights Rue Belliard 20, 1040 Brussels www.edri.org @EDRi tel. +32 (0) 2 274 25 70 ABOUT EDRI European Digital Rights is a network of 34 privacy and
More informationThe Copyright and Innovation Consultation in Adobe Systems Inc.
Adobe Systems Incorporated Response to the Copyright and Innovation Consultation paper for the Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation About Adobe Systems Incorporated Adobe is the global leader
More informationStatistics on Requests for data under the Data Retention Directive
Statistics on Requests for data under the Data Retention Directive Introduction 1. Directive 2006/24/EC on data retention ('the DRD') 1 requires Member States to provide the Commission on a yearly basis
More informationFiltering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases
Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases Stefan Kulk a, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius b a PhD Researcher, Centre for Intellectual Property Law (University of Utrecht) s.kulk[at]uu.nl
More informationDOC NO: INFOSOC 53/15 DATE ISSUED: June 2015. Resolution on the open and neutral Internet
DOC NO: INFOSOC 53/15 DATE ISSUED: June 2015 Resolution on the open and neutral Internet Introduction This resolution builds on the TACD net neutrality resolutions of April 2010 1 and June 2014 2, which
More informationIntroduction. This answering guide has been prepared in order to make the task of responding to the questionnaire easier for citizens.
Introduction The European Commission launched a public consultation on the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED) on 30 November 2012. IPRED is in force since 2004 and requires all
More informationCOMMUNIQUÉ ON PRINCIPLES FOR INTERNET POLICY-MAKING OECD HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON THE INTERNET ECONOMY,
COMMUNIQUÉ ON PRINCIPLES FOR INTERNET POLICY-MAKING OECD HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON THE INTERNET ECONOMY, 28-29 JUNE 2011 The Seoul Declaration on the Future of the Internet Economy adopted at the 2008 OECD
More informationEMI v UPC. THE DECISION AND CONSEQUENCES FOR IRISH ISPs AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
EMI v UPC THE DECISION AND CONSEQUENCES FOR IRISH ISPs AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS Sally-Anne Hinfey, DFMG Solicitors, IE 1 Introduction EMI v UPC 2 is a particularly controversial intellectual property judgment
More informationETNO Reflection Document in reply to the EC consultation on Future networks and the Internet early challenges regarding the Internet of things
ETNO Reflection Document in reply to the EC consultation on Future networks and the Internet early challenges regarding the Internet of things November 2008 Executive Summary The Internet of the future
More informationENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT CONCERNS, CHALLENGES AND ACTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE SINGLE MARKET.
ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT CONCERNS, CHALLENGES AND ACTIONS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE SINGLE MARKET GRUR Workshop Brussels March 7, 2007 Michael Keplinger* Overview: 1.
More informationPILLAR 1: BETTER ACCESS FOR CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES TO ONLINE GOODS AND SERVICES ACROSS EUROPE
European Commission sets out building blocks for a Digital Single Market May 2015 The European Commission (the Commission) s announcement of its Digital Single Market Strategy shows both a frustration
More informationOnline Security, Traffic Data and IP Addresses. Review of the Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications
Brussels, October 8 th 2008 Online Security, Traffic Data and IP Addresses Review of the Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Francisco Mingorance Senior Director Government Affairs franciscom@bsa.org
More informationDOC NO: INFOSOC 52/14 DATE ISSUED: June 2014. Resolution on the open and neutral Internet
DOC NO: INFOSOC 52/14 DATE ISSUED: June 2014 Resolution on the open and neutral Internet Introduction This resolution builds on the TACD net neutrality resolution of April 2010 1, which called for policies
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment. Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.9.2013 SWD(2013) 332 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European
More informationCyber Security Recommendations October 29, 2002
Cyber Security Recommendations October 29, 2002 Leading Co-Chair (Asia/Oceania) Co-Chair (Americas) Co-Chair (Europe/Africa) Dr. Hiroki Arakawa Executive Vice President NTT Data Corporation Richard Brown
More informationPanel: How broadband policy can contribute to deploy secured and universal broadband access. Presentation:
Panel: How broadband policy can contribute to deploy secured and universal broadband access Presentation: Initiatives to deploy broadband access in Europe Erik BOHLIN Chalmers University of Technology,
More informationEUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. on a common framework for electronic signatures
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 29.04.1999 COM(1999) 195 fmal 98/0191(COD) Amended proposal for a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on a common framework for electronic signatures
More informationDefinition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe
Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe FEE Survey October 2014 This document has been prepared by FEE to the best of its knowledge and ability to ensure that it is accurate and complete.
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2015 (OR. en)
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2015 (OR. en) PUBLIC 11243/15 LIMITE DRS 50 CODEC 1084 NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations Proposal for a DIRECTIVE
More informationilinc Legal & Technology Briefs The Liability of Internet Intermediaries In the EU
ilinc Legal & Technology Briefs The Liability of Internet Intermediaries In the EU Many start-ups fulfil an intermediary role within the online environment. These intermediary start-ups offer their users
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES GREEN PAPER
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 11.11.2009 COM(2009) 624 final GREEN PAPER on obtaining evidence in criminal matters from one Member State to another and securing its admissibility
More informationEuropean Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No. 2012 / 3. The amendment of the PSI directive: where are we heading?
European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No. 2012 / 3 The amendment of the PSI directive: where are we heading? Author: Katleen Janssen Published: April 2012 Keywords PSI re-use, European
More informationPresidency conclusions on establishing a strategy to combat the manipulation of sport results
COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO EN Presidency conclusions on establishing a strategy to combat the manipulation of sport results 3201st EDUCATIO, YOUTH, CULTURE and SPORT Council meeting Brussels, 26 and 27
More informationA clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries
A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries I. Background information 1. Please indicate your role for the purpose
More informationOpinion of the International Juvenile Justice Observatory
The International Juvenile Justice Observatory promoting international development strategies of appropriate policies, and intervention methods within the context of a global juvenile justice without borders.
More informationEU regulatory framework for e-commerce
EU regulatory framework for e-commerce WTO Workshop Geneva, 18 th June 2013 Denis Sparas European Commission Directorate General for Internal Market and Services Outline E-commerce Directive E-commerce
More informationEuropean judicial training 2014. Justice
European judicial training 2014 Justice Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone
More informationAn Optional Common European Sales Law: Advantages and Problems Advice to the UK Government
An Optional Common European Sales Law: Advantages and Problems Advice to the UK Government November 2011 AN OPTIONAL COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW: ADVANTAGES AND PROBLEMS Advice to the UK Government from
More informationCommittee of Ministers - The promotion of Internet and online media services a...
Page 1 of 5 Ministers Deputies CM Documents CM/AS(2010)Rec1882 final 18 June 2010 The promotion of Internet and online media services appropriate for minors Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1882 (2009)
More informationYou are invited to read the privacy statement for information on how your personal data and contribution will be dealt with.
Case Id: 45545034-754c-4f75-92e4-2e45a6a4e179 Date: 15/04/2016 11:50:07 Public consultation on the evaluation and modernisation of the legal framework for the enforcement of intellectual property rights:
More informationOECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making. 13 December 2011
OECD Council Recommendation on Principles for Internet Policy Making 13 December 2011 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to
More informationEuropean Union Law and Online Gambling by Marcos Charif
With infringement proceedings, rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the ongoing lack of online gambling regulation at EU level, it is important to understand the extent to which member states
More informationMinister Shatter presents Presidency priorities in the JHA area to European Parliament
Minister Shatter presents Presidency priorities in the JHA area to European Parliament 22 nd January 2013 The Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence, Alan Shatter TD, today presented the Irish Presidency
More informationCharter of Consumer Rights in the Digital World
DOC No: INFOSOC 37 08 DATE ISSUED: MARCH 2008 Charter of Consumer Rights in the Digital World Digital technologies contribute to an improvement in the quality of people s lives in many ways. They create
More informationIntermediary Liability and Website-Blocking in the EU. Jane C. Ginsburg Columbia University School of Law
Intermediary Liability and Website-Blocking in the EU Jane C. Ginsburg Columbia University School of Law Moving Parts Rights: 2001 Infosoc Directive Art. 3.2: Making available right Art 8.3: right to injunctive
More informationemarketplaces LEGAL LIABILITY e-business Issue www.emarketservices.com
emarket Services makes it easier for you to use electronic marketplaces for international business emarketplaces LEGAL LIABILITY e-business Issue By Teresa Rodríguez de las Heras Ballell Associate Professor
More informationLEAKED ACTA DIGITAL ENFORCEMENT CHAPTER
LEAKED ACTA DIGITAL ENFORCEMENT CHAPTER Frequently Asked Questions 1. Is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) only about counterfeiting? No. Counterfeiting involves the production of fake goods
More informationThe European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges
The European Commission s strategy on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 2011-2014: achievements, shortcomings and future challenges Fields marked with are mandatory. 1 Introduction - Background and
More informationFree access to information and culture: between freedom of expression and commercial interest Copyright law Access to public events
Free access to information and culture: between freedom of expression and commercial interest Copyright law Access to public events 27 May 2014, Bucharest Prof. Dr. Stephan Ory Conclusion There is no European
More information2011 COUNTRY WATCH LIST
The Congressional International Anti-Piracy Caucus Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Co-Chair Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Co-Chair Congressman Bob Goodlatte, Co-Chair Congressman Adam B. Schiff, Co-Chair 2011 COUNTRY
More informationAlternative Measures and illicit (P2P) file sharing: enforcement issues. Allard Ringnalda Willem Grosheide CIER
Alternative Measures and illicit (P2P) file sharing: enforcement issues Allard Ringnalda Willem Grosheide CIER Outline What are technical measures Why would we need them Three practical enforcement issues
More informationCCBE POSITION ON THE PROPOSED ELECTRONIC IDENTITY AND
CCBE POSITION ON THE PROPOSED ELECTRONIC IDENTITY AND TRUST SERVICES REGULATION (COM(2012) 238/2) CCBE Position on the proposed electronic identity and trust services regulation (COM(2012) 238/2) The Council
More informationRegional Anti-Corruption Action Plan for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, Tajikistan and Ukraine.
Anti-Corruption Network for Transition Economies OECD Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs 2, rue André Pascal F-75775 Paris Cedex 16 (France) phone: (+33-1) 45249106, fax: (+33-1)
More informationFactsheet on the Right to be
101010 100101 1010 101 Factsheet on the Right to be 100 Forgotten ruling (C-131/12) 101 101 1) What is the case about and what did 100 the Court rule? 10 In 2010 a Spanish citizen lodged a complaint against
More informationResolution on the EU Customs Action Plan to combat intellectual property rights infringements (2013 to 2017)
COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO EN Resolution on the EU Customs Action Plan to combat intellectual property rights infringements (2013 to 2017) 3208th COMPETITIVESS (Internal Market, Industry, Research and
More informationExecutive Summary Study on Co-Regulation Measures in the Media Sector
Executive Summary Study on Co-Regulation Measures in the Media Sector Study for the European Commission, Directorate Information Society and Media Unit A1 Audiovisual and Media Policies Tender DG EAC 03/04
More informationI. Background information
A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries I. Background information 1. Please indicate your role for the purpose
More informationConsultation on the future of European Insolvency Law
Consultation on the future of European Insolvency Law The Commission has put the revision of the Insolvency Regulation in its Work Programme for 2012. The revision is one of the measures in the field of
More informationBASIC NOTIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHT AND NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS
BASIC NOTIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHT AND NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS 1) What is the object of copyright protection? 2) What kind of protection does copyright grant? 3) How can copyright be obtained? Are there any formalities?
More informationExecutive summary. The functions of Internet intermediaries. A source of economic growth and innovation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Executive summary The functions of Internet intermediaries Internet intermediaries provide the Internet s basic infrastructure and platforms by enabling communication and transactions
More informationCode of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe
Code of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe 24 th March 2009 Version 0.17 Approved by Expert Group Plenary on 24 th March 2009 This Code of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe is recommended
More informationCode of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe
Code of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe 24 th March 2009 Version 0.17 Approved by Expert Group Plenary on 24 th March 2009 This Code of Practice on Electronic Invoicing in Europe is recommended
More informationCONSULTATION ON LEGISLATIVE OPTIONS TO ADDRESS ILLICIT PEER- TO-PEER (P2P) FILE-SHARING JULY 2008
CONSULTATION ON LEGISLATIVE OPTIONS TO ADDRESS ILLICIT PEER- TO-PEER (P2P) FILE-SHARING JULY 2008 2 Consultation document on legislative options to address illicit P2P file-sharing Explanation of the wider
More informationHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 16 thereof,
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Joint Communication of the Commission and of the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on a 'Cyber
More informationLobbying: Sweet Smell of Success?
Lobbying: Sweet Smell of Success? A case study on the transparency of lobbying around sugar regulation in the European Union and Spain 1. Introduction It is essential that government decision making be
More informationDeclaration of the Ministerial Conference of the Khartoum Process
Declaration of the Ministerial Conference of the Khartoum Process (EU-Horn of Africa Migration Route Initiative) Rome, 28 th November 2014 We, Ministers of the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
More information2011-2014. Deliverable 1. Input on the EU's role in fighting match-fixing. Expert Group "Good Governance. EU Work Plan for Sport
EU Work Plan for Sport 2011-2014 Expert Group "Good Governance Deliverable 1 Input on the EU's role in fighting match-fixing J u n e 2012 2 1. INTRODUCTION The EU Work Plan for Sport identifies integrity
More informationJoint Audio-visual Coalition Position Paper Proposal for a Collective Rights Management Directive (CRM)
Joint Audio-visual Coalition Position Paper Proposal for a Collective Rights Management Directive (CRM) 8 January 2013 INTRODUCTION: The Audio-visual (AV) Coalition - creators, creative contributors, technical
More informationORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT
2 OECD RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL FOR ENHANCED ACCESS AND MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the
More informationSOCIAL AND ETHICAL CHARTER FOR OUR SUPPLIERS
SOCIAL AND ETHICAL CHARTER FOR OUR SUPPLIERS CARREFOUR S COMMITMENT FOR RESPONSIBLE TRADE. 4 SOCIAL AND ETHICAL CHARTER FOR OUR SUPPLIERS CARREFOUR SOCIAL AND ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY The Carrefour group,
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
Proposal for a 2012/0180 (COD) DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works
More informationBEREC Monitoring quality of Internet access services in the context of Net Neutrality
BEREC Monitoring quality of Internet access services in the context of Net Neutrality BEUC statement Contact: Guillermo Beltrà - digital@beuc.eu Ref.: BEUC-X-2014-029 28/04/2014 BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES UNIONS
More informationI. Background information
A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries I. Background information 1. Please indicate your role for the purpose
More informationThis letter is to provide you with our views on the minimum criteria for the impact assessment and subsequent legislative proposal.
Dear Commissioner Malmström, As you know, we have been closely involved in consultations with the European Commission with regard to the impact assessment on, and probable review of, the Data Retention
More informationGuidelines on Executive Order on Information and Consent Required in Case of Storing and Accessing Information in End-User Terminal Equipment
Guidelines on Executive Order on Information and Consent Required in Case of Storing and Accessing Information in End-User Terminal Equipment ("Cookie Order") 2nd version, April 2013 Preface...3 1. Introduction...5
More informationUnder European law teleradiology is both a health service and an information society service.
ESR statement on the European Commission Staff Working Document on the applicability of the existing EU legal framework to telemedicine services (SWD 2012/413). The European Society of Radiology (ESR)
More informationQUESTIONNAIRE ON CONTRACT RULES FOR ONLINE PURCHASES OF DIGITAL CONTENT AND TANGIBLE GOODS
QUESTIONNAIRE ON CONTRACT RULES FOR ONLINE PURCHASES OF DIGITAL CONTENT AND TANGIBLE GOODS Information about the respondent 1. Please enter your full name OR the name of the organisation / company / institution
More informationINTRODUCTION. - Identification of your organisation, with postal and e-mail addresses
Microsoft s response to the Public consultation on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the Directive on Electronic commerce (2000/31/EC) INTRODUCTION - Identification
More informationPosition Paper. Orgalime response to the Public consultation on the. collaborative economy - Digital Single Market Strategy follow up assessment
Position Paper Brussels, 23 December 2015 Orgalime response to the Public consultation on the regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative
More informationBCS, The Chartered Institute for IT Consultation Response to:
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT Consultation Response to: A Comprehensive Approach to Personal Data Protection in the European Union Dated: 15 January 2011 BCS The Chartered Institute for IT First
More informationThe role of EU in supporting SMEs for protection of IPR. Avv. Elio De Tullio
The role of EU in supporting SMEs for protection of IPR Avv. Elio De Tullio EU Actions 2003 - New Customs Regulation 2004 - Enforcement Directive 2005 - Communication on European Industrial Policy: central
More informationPolicy Statement. Employee privacy, data protection and human resources. Prepared by the Commission on E-Business, IT and Telecoms. I.
International Chamber of Commerce The world business organization Policy Statement Employee privacy, data protection and human resources Prepared by the Commission on E-Business, IT and Telecoms I. Introduction
More informationAFRICAN DECLARATION on Internet Rights and Freedoms
AFRICAN DECLARATION on Internet Rights and Freedoms Last updated 28 August 2014 Emphasising that the Internet is an enabling space and resource for the realisation of all human rights, including the right
More informationSummary of replies to the public consultation on crossborder inheritance tax obstacles within the EU and possible solutions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION ANALYSES AND TAX POLICIES Direct tax policy & co-operation Brussels, Summary of replies to the public consultation on crossborder inheritance
More informationThe reform of the EU Data Protection framework - Building trust in a digital and global world. 9/10 October 2012
The reform of the EU Data Protection framework - Building trust in a digital and global world 9/10 October 2012 Questionnaire addressed to national Parliaments Please, find attached a number of questions
More informationEUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
C 47/6 Official Journal of the European Union 25.2.2010 EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Communication from the Commission on an Action Plan
More informationUK Government call for views
DRAFT DIRECTIVES ON THE ONLINE SALE OF DIGITAL CONTENT AND TANGIBLE GOODS UK Government call for views JANUARY 2016 Contents Draft Directives on the online sale of digital content and tangible goods...
More informationEDRi's Position Paper on Council text regarding net neutrality
EDRi's Position Paper on Council text regarding net neutrality The purpose of this document is to provide an analysis of the Council text, in order to show its limits, contradictions and problems. Loopholes
More informationPosition Paper. Introduction. General Remarks. Online Platforms
Position Paper UEAPME 1 s reply to the Public Consultation on Regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy. Introduction UEAPME welcomes
More informationPOSITION OF THE NOTARIES OF EUROPE ON THE POST-STOCKHOLM PROGRAMME
POSITION OF THE NOTARIES OF EUROPE ON THE POST-STOCKHOLM PROGRAMME In ever-increasing numbers, European citizens are living, studying, marrying, divorcing and dying in a Member State other than that in
More informationMOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Plenary sitting 20.10.2011 B7-0000/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral (O-xxxx/xxxx B7-0000/2011), pursuant to Rule 115(5) of the Rules of Procedure on
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.9.2014 COM(2014) 592 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation in the period from 4 December 2011 until 31 December
More informationANALYSIS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON
ANALYSIS OF THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION ON Science and Technology, the key to Europe s future: guidelines for future European policy to support research COM(353)2004 DG Research, European Commission,
More informationISSN 2443-8308. EaSI performance in 2014. Executive summary of EaSI Performance Monitoring Report 2014. Social Europe
ISSN 2443-8308 EaSI performance in 2014 Executive summary of EaSI Performance Monitoring Report 2014 Social Europe The European Union Programme for Employment and Social Innovation (EaSI) aims to contribute
More informationComments and proposals on the Chapter IV of the General Data Protection Regulation
Comments and proposals on the Chapter IV of the General Data Protection Regulation Ahead of the trialogue negotiations later this month, EDRi, Access, Panoptykon Bits of Freedom, FIPR and Privacy International
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON COPYRIGHT ON THE INTERNET
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON COPYRIGHT ON THE INTERNET Ministry of Culture April 2011 Recommendations from the committee on copyright on the internet The task of the Committee has been to examine
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, COM(2010) COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE Removing cross-border tax obstacles
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May 2011 9564/11. Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD)
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 2 May 2011 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD) 9564/11 SOC 372 MIGR 99 CODEC 714 DRS 64 WTO 187 SERVICES 66 NOTE from: Council General Secretariat to: Delegations
More informationPUBLIC CONSULTATION 1. INTRODUCTION
PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON LIMITATION PERIODS FOR COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF VICTIMS OF CROSS-BORDER ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 1. INTRODUCTION For more than 10 years the European Union has developed
More informationCCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE
CCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE CCBE position with respect to the free choice of a lawyer in relation to legal expenses insurance The Council
More informationHealthcare Coalition on Data Protection
Healthcare Coalition on Data Protection Recommendations and joint statement supporting citizens interests in the benefits of data driven healthcare in a secure environment Representing leading actors in
More information