Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing
|
|
- Tamsin Lindsey
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing Susanne Bülow, Michael Backmann, Nico Herzberg, Thomas Hille, Andreas Meyer, Benjamin Ulm, Tsun Yin Wong, Mathias Weske Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3, Potsdam, Germany Summary. Business process monitoring enables a fast and specific overview of the process executions in an enterprise. Traditionally, this kind of monitoring requires a coherent event log. Yet, in reality, execution information is often heterogeneous and distributed. In this paper, we present an approach that enables monitoring of business processes with execution data, independently of the structure and source of the event information. We achieve this by implementing an open source event processing platform combining existing techniques from complex event processing and business process management. Event processing includes transformation for abstraction as well as correlation to process instances and BPMN elements. Monitoring rules are automatically created from BPMN models and executed by the platform. Key words: Business Process Intelligence, Complex Event Processing, BPMN, Event Transformation, Event Correlation 1 Introduction The efficient and correct execution of business processes is essential for the success of an enterprise. Therefore, it is important to model and improve business processes as well as to monitor their executions [1]. Business process management systems (BPMS) control business processes and log the execution of process instances. These execution logs contain complete and structured information required for analysis and optimization of business processes. The information can be evaluated in the context of Business Activity Monitoring, for instance with process mining tools. Yet in some cases, the use of a BPMS is not possible. Enterprises without a BPMS might still have large, complex processes that are executed distributed over several locations and are highly interesting to monitor. During process execution, there arises a lot of information in form of events. An event is the technical representation of a real world happening. In contrast to traditional execution logs, events cannot be analyzed as they are, since they might not be structured nor related to a process instance. The goal of this paper is to enable business process monitoring with execution data, regardless of whether there are complete event logs or unstructured events. Therefore, we designed and implemented an open source event processing platform (EPP) combining existing techniques from complex event processing and business process man-
2 2 S. Bülow et al. needs to be cooled store chilled reload to other truck technical defect ship arrival store unchilled truck available load to truck transport discharge truck Fig. 1: Business process model of transport process from harbor to destination in BPMN. agement. The platform imports events from different sources, e.g., Excel lists or XML messages, and enriches them with information concerning the process, process instance, activity, and activity instance. In this approach, the methods of complex event processing are not only used for the actual monitoring but for the event enrichment as well. The system provides a high degree of flexibility and adaptability of those enrichment rules in order to make it configurable for different use cases. The EPP presented in this paper builds upon a framework describing how to enrich raw events with context and process data via normalized and business events to process events [2]. There, raw events are the representation of real world happenings in information systems, normalized events have been put into a predefined structure based on the event type, business events contain contextual information existing orthogonally to business processes, and process events are correlated to specific process information, e.g., process instances. To allow monitoring of processes, we adapt the technique of event monitoring points [3], which are attached to specific state transitions of the life cycle of an activity [1] to signal the occurring of a specific event for a specific process instance. The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 introduces a scenario that will be taken as a running example throughout the paper. Section 3 explains the developed techniques to enable monitoring without the existence of a BPMS. This includes transformation, correlation, and monitoring aspects as well as the architecture and implementation of the underlying platform realizing our concepts. Section 4 discusses related work before Section 5 concludes the paper. 2 Scenario The scenario used as a running example in this paper addresses processes in logistics. Specifically, we want to examine a transport process of a as it can be seen in Fig. 1 modeled in BPMN [4]. The arrives on a ship at the harbor and is then stored at a warehouse. The storage is either chilled or unchilled depending on the goods stored in the. As soon as a truck is available, the is loaded to the truck and transported to the customer, where it is discharged. During the transport a technical defect might occur that turns it inevitable to reload the to another truck. There are a lot of events that occur during process execution. Some of these events can be seen in Fig. 2. A ShipEvent is sent from the ship containing information about
3 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing 3 ShipEvent Type:-Edifact Sender:-Ship WarehouseEvent Type:-Excel Sender:-Warehouse TruckReadyEvent Type:-XML Sender:-In-house parking-area DriverReadyEvent Type:-XML Sender:-Driver DefectEvent Type:-XML Sender:-Driver DeliveryEvent Type:-XML Sender:-Driver Fig. 2: Occuring events in transport process the loaded s, e.g., id and storage hints, as well as arrival time. This event is in the EDIFACT format, which is the standard in technical business communication. The warehouse regularly sends Excel lists about the arrival of new goods or the sending of goods, which represents a WarehouseEvent. A TruckReadyEvent occurs when an empty truck is handed in at an in-house parking area. In our example, truck drivers are equipped with a mobile device that can send XML messages to the logistics headquarter. In this way a driver is able to send a message (DriverReadyEvent), when she is available for a new delivery. If a TruckReadyEvent and a DriverReadyEvent occur in the same area, driver and truck are available and can be used to transport the to the customer. DefectEvents and DeliveryEvents are sent by the driver equally to a DriverReadyEvent informing the headquarter about a technical defect or updating the status of the delivery. Note that a DefectEvent is an unexpected event that does not need to occur for a successful process execution indicated by the dashed lines. Each type of event consists of different key-value pairs. Some example events can be seen in Fig. 3. The described process is not easy to monitor without software support, because these events are neither on the same abstraction hierarchy nor are they by content directly related to the process execution. However, with the approach described in this paper, it is possible to connect those events with the corresponding business process instances. Then, using the process model and some configuration rules, monitoring of the process execution is enabled. 3 Processing of Events and Monitoring This chapter provides an overview of the platform s architecture and illustrates how correlation and transformation are used to enable the monitoring of process instances. Event(1): WarehouseEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :40 Container ID: AX23 Type: incoming Event(2):TruckReadyEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :10 Truck Number: 345 Event(3): DriverReadyEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :00 Driver Number: 987 Fig. 3: Examples for a WarehouseEvent, a TruckReadyEvent, and a DriverReadyEvent
4 4 S. Bülow et al. EventType 1 * * * Process -eventtypes[] : EventType -processinstances[] : ProcessInstance 1 * Event -eventtype : EventType -processinstances[] : ProcessInstance * * ProcessInstance -events[] : Event -timerevent : Event Fig. 4: Class diagram of the logical core classes for event processing. It demonstrates the transformation from unstructured raw events to process events. As you can see in Fig. 4, process events are associated to one event type and a set of process instances. An event type describes a schema composed of attribute names and attribute types for events. Events have to comply with this schema. The attributes specified in the event type are filled with concrete values matching the attribute type in the event. A process instance is a concrete execution of a process. 3.1 Architecture This section gives an overview of the architecture of the platform presented in Fig. 5 by providing a high level description of important parts. The Event Producers provide events to the Event Receiver, which forwards them to the Correlation Processor. Afterwards they are sent to the Broker that saves them via the Persistence Layer and passes them on to the Query Processor where the events are matched with the previously by the Transformation Processor and Monitoring Processor registered queries. The aforementioned important modules of the architecture are described in detail below. Event Receiver. The Event Receiver is responsible for the import and normalization of events. It receives raw events from different external sources like Excel (.xls/.xlsx), XML or EDIFACT files, and internally created events from transformation. The structure of raw events is undefined. Raw events and normalized events can be flat or hierarchical depending on the input. Based on the incoming events, the Event Receiver produces a normalized event stream. Normalized events are associated to an event type and contain at least a generated ID and a timestamp which can either be the import time or part of the incoming raw event. The remaining information is stored in the payload. Correlation Processor. The Correlation Processor needs user defined rules to correlate events to process instances. Each event can be correlated to multiple process instances and each process instance contains a reference to one process. If there is no existing process instance representation in the EPP that fits to the incoming event, a new one is created. The correlation is executed on the normalized events from the event receiver and creates process events as output. Events which have no relation to any Correlation Rule are forwarded without modification. Broker. The Broker receives the process events from the Correlation Processor. It forwards them simultaneously to the database for permanent storage and to the Query Processor for event stream processing. The Broker enables data integrity and consistency implemented with the concept of mutual exclusion in a multi-threaded environment.
5 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing 5 Event Producer 1 Event Producer n EventCReceiver EventCTypes Events Transformation Processor MonitoringC Processor CorrelationC Processor Queries R Processes R UserC Interface Process Instances R QueryC Processor Broker R MonitoringC Points AggregationC Rules PersistenceCLayer EventCProcessingCPlatform BPMN Models Database Fig. 5: Architectural overview of our event processing platform. Transformation Processor. The Transformation Processor creates new events by the usage of Transformation Rules which are registered queries. These Transformation Rules are defined by the user. The platform provides a user interface for these definitions. The Transformation Processor registers listeners for these rules at the Query Processor. If a rule matches, the corresponding listener is invoked and the Transformation Processor creates a new event as defined in the rule. The new events are sent to the Event Receiver. Monitoring Processor. To monitor processes, additional information about the relationship between events and processes respectively activities is required. The user can use BPMN process models which are extended by event monitoring points to achieve this connection. With this information, the Monitoring Processor can keep track of running process instances and their progress. Query Processor. The Query Processor works with the stream of typed events and tries to detect the query patterns that have been registered by the Transformation Processor or Monitoring Processor. The Query Processor holds these queries for monitoring and transformation. As soon as a query pattern matches, the Query Processor triggers the corresponding listener. The component that registered the query at the Query Processor can then react to the invoked listener. The Query Processor utilizes an event processing language (EPL), in our case the Esper Query Language [5].
6 6 S. Bülow et al. Persistence Layer and Database. The Persistence Layer enables the connection of the platform to the Database. The database stores all relevant entities (processes, events, process instances, event types, etc.) and provides access to them. In our case, the database is realized with MySQL and the persistence layer connects the database to the platform implemented in Java via JPA, the Java persistence API. In the following, we refer to the Transformation Processor in Section 3.2, the Correlation Processor in Section 3.3 and the Monitoring Processor in Section Transformation Normalized events differ in quality since they originate from various business processes where events are captured with different techniques reaching from manual to fullyautomated. Following the approach in [2], our Transformation Processor enables the creation of business events from normalized events and other business events by supporting the functionalities of transformation event processing agents described in [6] such as translation, aggregation, composition, enrichment and projection of events and the usage of context data that exists orthogonally to the business processes. A Transformation Rule consists of a pattern that triggers the creation of a new event and the definition of the event that shall be created. The user has to define the pattern specifying conditions such as the execution order and filtering of events from different event streams. A Transformation Rule Editor abstracting from the Esper Query Language is provided to facilitate the creation of these patterns. The user can build a pattern by the usage of visual elements and suggestions with a preview illustrating the structure of the created pattern. Due to the graphical presentation and the input suggestions of the editor syntactical errors by the user can be avoided. To define the resulting business event, the attribute values have to be determined based on the selection of the event type for the event. These values are mapped by events included in the pattern definition or by context data pulled from the database. For unified access to the database, the context data is stored in an event structure. A query is derived from the Transformation Rule and registered at the Transformation Processor, which creates and activates a statement for the query. In the next step, the Transformation Processor registers a listener for the statement at the Query Processor. Once the events received from the Query Processor fulfill the defined pattern, the listener is invoked and the business event is created. If the type of this business event is referenced in another Transformation Rule, the creation of business events will cascade. In the running example, events of the types WarehouseEvent, TruckReadyEvent, and DriverReadyEvent, e.g., Event(1), (2) and (3), as stated in Section 2 can be aggregated to a business event representing the information of an available driver with a truck assigned for the transport of a certain. A WarehouseEvent expresses the arrival of a in a warehouse and concurrently alerts the need for a transport via truck. Hence, a truck and a driver have to be available in the same region. This information is provided by events of the types TruckReadyEvent and DriverReadyEvent. The Transformation Rule defines a pattern matching on a WarehouseEvent, a TruckEvent, and a DriverEvent that occurred on the same location. If the events matching the pattern are received by the platform, the Transformation Rule is triggered, and the aggregated
7 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing 7 Event(1): WarehouseEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :40 Container ID: AX23 Type: incoming Event(2):TruckReadyEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :10 Truck Number: 345 Event(3): DriverReadyEvent Timestamp: 17/04/ :00 Driver Number: 987 Pattern: WarehouseEvent TruckReadyEvent DriverReadyEvent Condition: (WarehouseEvent.Location = TruckReadyEvent.Location = DriverReadyEvent.Location) WarehouseEvent.Type = incoming Event(4) : Aggregated Event Timestamp: 17/04/ :10 Container ID: AX23 Truck Number: 345 Driver Number: 987 Fig. 6: Example of an event Transformation Rule creating a business event from normalized events. event is created as shown in Fig. 6. The transport planner can thus react to the aggregated event by assigning the driver to the truck and sending it on the road. In order to improve the location condition, a usage of context data referencing cities and hubs to geospatial coordinates can be defined. By this means, the condition could be stated by defining a maximum distance of the locations and thereby enabling a more tolerant matching. 3.3 Process Correlation Every incoming event has to be assigned to a process instance to enable monitoring of processes. As already shown in Fig. 4, our events contain a list of process instances, where each process instance belongs to a process. Correlation is defined as the relationship between two events and defines a collection of semantic rules to specify how certain events are related to each other [7]. In our case, events are related to each other, if they contain equal values for certain attributes. These identifying correlation attributes define the relation of events to process instances as well. Thus, the Correlation Processor tries to correlate the events to a set of process instances. In our approach, the Correlation Rules are defined by the user with suggestions from the Correlation Processor. The user has to determine a process for the Correlation Rule. Then he assigns a set of event types to the Correlation Rule. Every event type specifies a set of attributes. Out of these attributes, the user determines the identifying attributes for the Correlation Rule, the so called correlation attributes. The Correlation Processor uses the defined Correlation Rules during runtime in order to group matching events to process instances. The Correlation Processor groups all events from the database and new incoming events from external event sources that have an event type according to a Correlation Rule. Events belong to the same process instance, if they have the same value in the correlation attributes. Correspondingly, one process instance is created for every distinct value set of the correlation attributes. In our example all events have an attribute which contains the identification number of the transported (Container ID) (see Section 2). The Correlation Processor creates a process instance for every distinct identification number. This single attribute correlation is not sufficient for our use case as the process is intended to monitor a from the arrival in the harbor until the discharge from the truck. Furthermore,
8 8 S. Bülow et al. one should consider that a can be used several times. So if the would arrive again some month later in the harbor, the event would be correlated to the same process instance as before. Therefore, it is possible to additionally correlate the events depending on their timestamp. One of the selected event types has to be determined as a timer and the user has to define a period of time starting or ending with the timer event. The timer can be seen as an additional Correlation Rule and if both rules (the single attribute and the timer rule) match, the event will be correlated to the process instance. In reference to the running example, the user determines the ShipEvent that indicates the arrival of the in the harbor as timer event and defines the period of time as one week for the consecutive events. Therefore, the occurrence of an event of the type ShipEvent with the ID AX23 triggers the creation of a representation of the process instance in the platform. Event(2) as well as Event(4) from Section 3.2 are assigned to the same process instance. Events of the types DefectEvent and DeliveryEvent are treated the same way, if containing the same ID and time frame. In consequence of enriching the Correlation Rule with the timer, a re-arrival of the AX23 several months later, would result in an assignment of the new events to a second process instance. 3.4 Automatic Generation of Monitoring Queries With complex event processing, it is possible to monitor the execution of processes and the analysis of finished process instances. Many users of process monitoring are more familiar with business process modeling languages than with an EPL like Esper Query Language in our case. Therefore, we decided to give the user the possibility to model a BPMN process and to upload it into the EPP. Afterwards, the Monitoring Processor derives queries from the BPMN process for the Query Processor. For automatic query generation, we assume, utilized BPMN process models are block-structured. In order to create modular and independent queries, it is necessary to decompose the BPMN process in smaller components. We use the refined process structure tree (RPST) described in [8]. The RPST is an algorithm to decompose a workflow graph into smaller parts in a hierarchical structure. The elements of the RPST are canonical blocks with a single entry and a single exit. One advantage of a decomposition with the RPST is that the canonical blocks do not overlap, hence every edge of the model s graph is only considered in one query. In the next step, we map every block of the tree to a specific pattern type which afterwards is used for the query creation. Possible pattern types for a block are: Sequence: all elements belong to a polygon of the RPST which indicates that they are in a sequential execution order. Or: the elements are located in a bond of the RPST on several paths (polygons), where only the elements of one path are executed. And: the elements are located in a bond of the RPST on several paths (polygons), where the elements of all paths are executed. Loop: the elements are located in a bond of the RPST and they belong to a loop. Timer: the polygon contains a sequence of elements that includes a boundary timer element which indicates the continuation of the process execution and interrupts the execution of the element with the attached timer after a specified time duration.
9 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing 9 We generate a different query for each pattern type mentioned above. Additionally, there is a state transition query for each monitorable BPMN element. This state transition query represents the life cycle of a single element, therefore it is possible to monitor the different state transitions which an element passes through during its life cycle. Figure 7a illustrates the three important canonical blocks for our scenario process. Due to the increased clarity, four smaller sequential blocks in the loop- and in the orblock are omitted. The canonical blocks have been enriched by their pattern types. Besides, occurring events in the EPP need to be bound to the elements of the BPMN process. We enrich the BPMN process elements with event monitoring points as explained in [3]. A event monitoring point stores information concerning the different states of the element s life cycle. The state transitions within the event monitoring point can be bound to an event type via matching algorithms, e.g. string pattern matching or stemming. The matching is applied to the event type name and a certain value of the event monitoring point. Thus, it is possible to generate a query for every canonical block containing elements with event monitoring points. Only the elements with event monitoring points are monitorable and have to be considered whereas the remaining elements are ignored. In Fig. 7b the three generated pattern queries for the canonical blocks from Fig. 7a are depicted. As mentioned above, the queries are written in the Esper Query Language [5]. This language provides patterns in order to query event streams. Every query is registered at the Query Processor, which provides a listener that then gives information about the query completion. The queries can be nested and also depend on the completion of other queries. The structure of the nested queries is closely related to the RPST-structure. In our case, the Monitoring Processor is registered as a listener that collects the information about the execution status for every query. Through the assembly of the queries, it is possible to deduce the status of a process instance. The Monitoring Processor facilitates the monitoring of the running process instances and the detection of violations in the execution order. Furthermore, it gives possibilities to analyze finished process instances, e.g., the execution time or the frequency of execution paths. In our scenario, the advancement and the status of s can be pursued by means of this approach. Fig. 7a illustrates how the event types introduced in Section 2 are bound to elements of the process model. If during process execution an event of the event type ShipEvent enters the Monitoring Processor, it is already correlated to a process instance. Then, the event is bound to the message start event of this process instance. The occurrence of an event of the type WarehouseEvent correlated to the same process instance will then indicate that the process instance is progressed to the waiting for a truck. Hence, through the binding of event types to process elements, e.g., activities, the progress of a process instance can be monitored in real-time with the arrival of the events. 3.5 Implementation Our approach was implemented in a platform using the underlying EPL Esper and can be downloaded with test data and a screencast at de/public/epp. In the platform, event producers can be connected to the event receiver, who creates normalized events out of raw events. For event processing, trans-
10 10 S. Bülow et al. Sequence Or Aneeds toabeacooled storea chilled reload toaother truck Loop technical defect shipaarrival storea unchilled truck available load toatruck transport discharge truck ShipEvent StateATransition:Aexecute WareHouseEvent StateATransition:Aterminate AggregatedEvent StateATransition:Aexecute TruckReadyEvent DriverReadyEvent DefectEvent StateATransition:Aexecute DeliveryEvent StateATransition:Aterminate (a) BPMN process with canonical blocks and event types bound to process elements Sequence: ShipEventT=>TOrT=>TAggregatedEventT=>TLoopT=>TDeliveryEvent Or: WareHouseEventTTORTTWareHouseEvent Loop: DefectEventTUNTILTDeliveryEvent (b) Generated patterns for the BPMN process Fig. 7: BPMN scenario process (a) with associated pattern queries (b) formation, and correlation rules can be configured. For monitoring, BPMN models annotated with event monitoring points can be uploaded to the platform and connected to business processes. A graphical Web interface is provided for usage of the system. Summarizing, the users can configure and adapt the platform to monitor their processes with different event sources. Previously, process mining was not possible with heterogeneous and distributed raw events of process executions. With our platform, it is possible to deduce enough information to enable process mining and monitoring. 4 Related Work The event processing platform (EPP) presented in this paper targets on an high-quality event basis for business process intelligence (BPI) by processing raw events with techniques known from the field is complex event processing (CEP). BPI aims to manage the quality of process executions by utilizing monitoring and analysis, prediction, control, and optimization [9, 10]. [10 12] concerns the capturing and storing of business process execution data, however, they assume that every process step is recorded and thus, the resulting event log is complete. [9] describes a reference architecture for BPI, containing an integration, a functional, and a visualization layer. The presented approach targets on the integration and functional layer by integrating and combining process execution data, process knowledge, and context data. Process mining [13] is one application of business process intelligence [14] and profits from the EPP. The created process events could be exported from the EPP to an event log to allow the extraction of all kinds of process information, e.g., execution times and conformance information to given process models. The presented EPP could
11 Monitoring of Business Processes with Complex Event Processing 11 be used as pre-processing step for the existing process mining techniques [13] to bridge the gap of the assumption that an event log needs to be complete. [15] presents an overview of business activity monitoring (BAM) and gives a four class-categorization of BAM systems: pure BAM, discovery-oriented BAM, simulationoriented BAM, and reporting-oriented BAM. As all of these classes base on events with high information content, the presented approach could be applied to enable BAM techniques and methods to provide valuable monitoring results by using the produced process events as input. Del-Río-Ortega et al. [16] presents the concept of process performance indicators (PPI), the process related form of key performance indicators, to enable process evaluation. The presented EPP could provide the input for the so-called process measurements, e.g., time, costs, and occurrences and the concept of PPIs could be applied on top. Therewith, measurements can already be provided while process instance is still running. This enables that violations of tolerance thresholds can be mitigated before the process instance failed a PPI, for instance. The first emphasis of the presented platform is set on the preparation of events for BPI. [17] explains an example of event preparation that creates structured event logs from static data tables. This is done without CEP context and therefore without hierarchical abstraction. In our approach, we use transformation as defined in [6] to abstract from low level events and create business events. Several works concentrate on the correlation of events to process instances. In [7], Correlation Rules are generated semiautomatically for various data sources. The Correlation Rules, we use, are determined by the user in our platform (with the guidance of the platform) and the corresponding procedure is manually configurable. Furthermore, our correlation is more flexible since it is not only dependable on correlation attributes but can be extended on time periods. Secondly, we focused on automated BPI with the help of CEP. [18] introduces techniques to automatically generate Esper queries by taking a choreography model as a formalization of the process. We follow the same approach but with BPMN. In [19], BPMN models are taken as a basis to create EPL statements to monitor process violations but not to monitor the execution as it is our goal. [18] as well as [19] assume complete, structured event logs. Since we do not make the same precondition, the model in our approach must first be annotated with event monitoring points that bind events to states of the life cycle of BPMN elements as described in [3]. Our work supports and implements the framework introduced in [2]. We combine approaches to create queries from models with approaches concerning event preparation including normalization, transformation, and correlation to process instances and activity instances. Important terms related to CEP used in this paper are taken from [20]. 5 Conclusion In this paper, we have proposed an architecture for the approach to enable monitoring of business processes with execution data, independently of the structure and source of the obtainable events. We achieved this by using CEP with rules configurable by the user. Our approach supports business process models in BPMN, which is a well-known standard in process modeling. Furthermore, a graphical interface facilitates the usage of
12 12 S. Bülow et al. the system. Consequently, it can be used directly by managers without IT background. The developed platform can be easily configured for the user s own needs. In future work, we intend to enhance our system to monitor process execution violations besides the actual instance monitoring. Beyond, the scalability and performance of our system has to be examined. References 1. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Second Edition. Springer (2012) 2. Herzberg, N., Weske, M.: Enriching raw events to enable process intelligence research challenges. Technical Report 73, Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam (2013) 3. Herzberg, N., Kunze, M., Rogge-Solti, A.: Towards Process Evaluation in Non-automated Process Execution Environments. In: ZEUS, CEUR-WS (2012) OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011) 5. Bernhardt, T., Vasseur, A.: Esper: Event Stream Processing and Correlation. Online: esper-event-stream-processing-and-correlation.html (March 2007) 6. Etzion, O., Niblett, P.: Event Processing in Action. Manning Publications Co. (2010) 7. Rozsnyai, S., Slominski, A., Lakshmanan, G.T.: Discovering event correlation rules for semi-structured business processes. In: Distributed event-based system, ACM (2011) Vanhatalo, J., Völzer, H., Koehler, J.: The refined process structure tree. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9) (2009) Mutschler, B., Reichert, M.: Aktuelles Schlagwort: Business Process Intelligence. EMISA Forum 26(1) (January 2006) Grigori, D., Casati, F., Castellanos, M., Dayal, U., Sayal, M., Shan, M.: Business Process Intelligence. Computers in Industry 53(3) (April 2004) Azvine, B., Cui, Z., Nauck, D., Majeed, B.: Real Time Business Intelligence for the Adaptive Enterprise. In: CEC/EEE, IEEE (2006) Melchert, F., Winter, R., Klesse, M.: Aligning Process Automation and Business Intelligence to Support Corporate Performance Management. In: AMCIS, Association for Information Systems (2004) van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Overview and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Manage. Inf. Syst. 3(2) (2012) 7:1-7: van der Aalst, W.M.P., et al.: Process Mining Manifesto. In: BPM Workshops, Springer (2012) Dahanayake, A., Welke, R., Cavalheiro, G.: Improving the Understanding of BAM Technology for Real-time Decision Support. IJBIS 7(1) (December 2011) Del-Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Defining Process Performance Indicators: An Ontological Approach. In: OTM. Springer (2010) Rodríguez, C., Engel, R., Kostoska, G., Daniel, F., Casati, F., Aimar, M.: Eventifier: Extracting process execution logs from operational databases. In: Demonstration Track of BPM Conference, CEUR-WS (2012) Baouab, A., Perrin, O., Godart, C.: An Optimized Derivation of Event Queries to Monitor Choreography Violations. In: ICSOC, Springer (2012) Weidlich, M., Ziekow, H., Mendling, J., Günther, O., Weske, M., Desai, N.: Event-based monitoring of process execution violations. In: BPM, Springer (2011) Luckham, D., Schulte, R.: Event Processing Glossary. Online: event-processing-glossary-version-2-0/ (2011)
An Event Processing Platform for Business Process Management
An Event Processing Platform for Business Process Management Nico Herzberg, Andreas Meyer, and Mathias Weske Business Process Technology Group Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam Potsdam,
More informationTowards Process Evaluation in Non-automated Process Execution Environments
Towards Process Evaluation in Non-automated Process Execution Environments Nico Herzberg, Matthias Kunze, Andreas Rogge-Solti Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Strasse
More informationA Business Process Services Portal
A Business Process Services Portal IBM Research Report RZ 3782 Cédric Favre 1, Zohar Feldman 3, Beat Gfeller 1, Thomas Gschwind 1, Jana Koehler 1, Jochen M. Küster 1, Oleksandr Maistrenko 1, Alexandru
More informationSupport of Decision Tasks in Business Process Improvement
Support of Decision Tasks in Business Process Improvement Ekaterina Bazhenova Hasso Plattner Institute at the University of Potsdam ekaterina.bazhenova@hpi.uni-potsdam.de Abstract. The vigorous technological
More informationA Software Architecture for a Transportation Control Tower
A Software Architecture for a Transportation Control Tower Anne Baumgraß 1, Remco Dijkman 2, Paul Grefen 2, Shaya Pourmirza 2, Hagen Völzer 3, Mathias Weske 1 1 Hasso Plattner Institut, University of Potsdam,
More informationAn Optimized Derivation of Event Queries to Monitor Choreography Violations
An Optimized Derivation of Event Queries to Monitor Choreography Violations Aymen Baouab, Olivier Perrin, and Claude Godart Loria - Inria Nancy - Université de Lorraine - UMR 7503, BP 239, F-54506 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy
More informationEmbedding Conformance Checking in a Process Intelligence System in Hospital Environments. 1 University Hospital of Jena
Embedding Conformance Checking in a Process Intelligence System in Hospital Environments Kathrin Kirchner 1, Nico Herzberg 2, Andreas Rogge-Solti 2, and Mathias Weske 2 1 University Hospital of Jena Bachstrasse
More informationMercy Health System. St. Louis, MO. Process Mining of Clinical Workflows for Quality and Process Improvement
Mercy Health System St. Louis, MO Process Mining of Clinical Workflows for Quality and Process Improvement Paul Helmering, Executive Director, Enterprise Architecture Pete Harrison, Data Analyst, Mercy
More informationEDIminer: A Toolset for Process Mining from EDI Messages
EDIminer: A Toolset for Process Mining from EDI Messages Robert Engel 1, R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose 2, Christian Pichler 1, Marco Zapletal 1, and Hannes Werthner 1 1 Vienna University of Technology,
More informationEventifier: Extracting Process Execution Logs from Operational Databases
Eventifier: Extracting Process Execution Logs from Operational Databases Carlos Rodríguez 1, Robert Engel 2, Galena Kostoska 1, Florian Daniel 1, Fabio Casati 1, and Marco Aimar 3 1 University of Trento,
More informationBPMN PATTERNS USED IN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
BPMN PATTERNS USED IN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS Gabriel Cozgarea 1 Adrian Cozgarea 2 ABSTRACT: Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) is a graphical standard in which controls and activities can
More informationData-Aware Service Choreographies through Transparent Data Exchange
Institute of Architecture of Application Systems Data-Aware Service Choreographies through Transparent Data Exchange Michael Hahn, Dimka Karastoyanova, and Frank Leymann Institute of Architecture of Application
More informationMonitoring BPMN-Processes with Rules in a Distributed Environment
Monitoring BPMN-Processes with Rules in a Distributed Environment Lothar Hotz 1, Stephanie von Riegen 1, Lars Braubach 2, Alexander Pokahr 2, and Torsten Schwinghammer 3 1 HITeC e.v. c/o Fachbereich Informatik,
More informationUSING COMPLEX EVENT PROCESSING TO MANAGE PATTERNS IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
USING COMPLEX EVENT PROCESSING TO MANAGE PATTERNS IN DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS Foued BAROUNI Eaton Canada FouedBarouni@eaton.com Bernard MOULIN Laval University Canada Bernard.Moulin@ift.ulaval.ca ABSTRACT
More informationA Software Framework for Risk-Aware Business Process Management
A Software Framework for Risk-Aware Business Management Raffaele Conforti 1, Marcello La Rosa 1,2, Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede 1,4, Giancarlo Fortino 3, Massimiliano de Leoni 4, Wil M.P. van der Aalst 4,1,
More informationWebSphere Business Modeler
Discovering the Value of SOA WebSphere Process Integration WebSphere Business Modeler Workshop SOA on your terms and our expertise Soudabeh Javadi Consulting Technical Sales Support WebSphere Process Integration
More informationAnalysis of Service Level Agreements using Process Mining techniques
Analysis of Service Level Agreements using Process Mining techniques CHRISTIAN MAGER University of Applied Sciences Wuerzburg-Schweinfurt Process Mining offers powerful methods to extract knowledge from
More informationProcess Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns
Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns Stephen A. White, IBM Corp., United States ABSTRACT The research work of Wil van der Aalst, Arthur ter Hofstede, Bartek Kiepuszewski, and Alistair Barros
More informationSoftware Architecture Document
Software Architecture Document Natural Language Processing Cell Version 1.0 Natural Language Processing Cell Software Architecture Document Version 1.0 1 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents... 2
More informationModeling Guidelines Manual
Modeling Guidelines Manual [Insert company name here] July 2014 Author: John Doe john.doe@johnydoe.com Page 1 of 22 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Business Process Management (BPM)... 4 2.1.
More informationProcess Modelling from Insurance Event Log
Process Modelling from Insurance Event Log P.V. Kumaraguru Research scholar, Dr.M.G.R Educational and Research Institute University Chennai- 600 095 India Dr. S.P. Rajagopalan Professor Emeritus, Dr. M.G.R
More informationRelational XES: Data Management for Process Mining
Relational XES: Data Management for Process Mining B.F. van Dongen and Sh. Shabani Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands. B.F.v.Dongen, S.Shabaninejad@tue.nl
More informationInvestigating Clinical Care Pathways Correlated with Outcomes
Investigating Clinical Care Pathways Correlated with Outcomes Geetika T. Lakshmanan, Szabolcs Rozsnyai, Fei Wang IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA August 2013 Outline Care Pathways Typical Challenges
More informationIntegrating the Internet of Things with Business Process Management: A Process-aware Framework for Smart Objects
Integrating the Internet of Things with Business Process Management: A Process-aware Framework for Smart Objects Giovanni Meroni 1 Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria
More informationBuilding a virtual marketplace for software development tasks
Building a virtual marketplace for software development tasks Boris Kötting & Frank Maurer University of Kaiserlautern & University of Calgary koetting@informatik.uni-kl.de & maurer@cpsc.ucalgary.ca Abstract
More informationAn Automated Workflow System Geared Towards Consumer Goods and Services Companies
Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali, Indonesia, January 7 9, 2014 An Automated Workflow System Geared Towards Consumer Goods and Services
More informationA Survey Study on Monitoring Service for Grid
A Survey Study on Monitoring Service for Grid Erkang You erkyou@indiana.edu ABSTRACT Grid is a distributed system that integrates heterogeneous systems into a single transparent computer, aiming to provide
More informationCCaaS: Online Conformance Checking as a Service
CCaaS: Online Conformance Checking as a Service Ingo Weber 1, Andreas Rogge-Solti 2, Chao Li 1, and Jan Mendling 2 1 NICTA, Sydney, Australia firstname.lastname@nicta.com.au 2 Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien,
More informationAn Ontology-based Framework for Enriching Event-log Data
An Ontology-based Framework for Enriching Event-log Data Thanh Tran Thi Kim, Hannes Werthner e-commerce group Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Vienna, Austria Email: kimthanh@ec.tuwien.ac.at,
More informationTraining Management System for Aircraft Engineering: indexing and retrieval of Corporate Learning Object
Training Management System for Aircraft Engineering: indexing and retrieval of Corporate Learning Object Anne Monceaux 1, Joanna Guss 1 1 EADS-CCR, Centreda 1, 4 Avenue Didier Daurat 31700 Blagnac France
More informationWoPeD - An Educational Tool for Workflow Nets
WoPeD - An Educational Tool for Workflow Nets Thomas Freytag, Cooperative State University (DHBW) Karlsruhe, Germany freytag@dhbw-karlsruhe.de Martin Sänger, 1&1 Internet AG, Karlsruhe, Germany m.saenger09@web.de
More informationProcess Mining for Electronic Data Interchange
Process Mining for Electronic Data Interchange R. Engel 1, W. Krathu 1, C. Pichler 2, W. M. P. van der Aalst 3, H. Werthner 1, and M. Zapletal 1 1 Vienna University of Technology, Austria Institute for
More informationStructural Detection of Deadlocks in Business Process Models
Structural Detection of Deadlocks in Business Process Models Ahmed Awad and Frank Puhlmann Business Process Technology Group Hasso Plattner Institut University of Potsdam, Germany (ahmed.awad,frank.puhlmann)@hpi.uni-potsdam.de
More informationFlowSpy: : exploring Activity-Execution Patterns from Business Processes
FlowSpy: : exploring Activity-Execution Patterns from Business Processes Cristian Tristão 1, Duncan D. Ruiz 2, Karin Becker 3 ctristaobr@gmail.com, duncan@pucrs.br, kbeckerbr@gmail.com 1 Departamento de
More informationLluis Belanche + Alfredo Vellido. Intelligent Data Analysis and Data Mining. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery
Lluis Belanche + Alfredo Vellido Intelligent Data Analysis and Data Mining or Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery a.k.a. Data Mining II An insider s view Geoff Holmes: WEKA founder Process Mining
More informationSemantic Business Process Management Lectuer 1 - Introduction
Arbeitsgruppe Semantic Business Process Management Lectuer 1 - Introduction Prof. Dr. Adrian Paschke Corporate Semantic Web (AG-CSW) Institute for Computer Science, Freie Universitaet Berlin paschke@inf.fu-berlin.de
More informationAnalytics for Performance Optimization of BPMN2.0 Business Processes
Analytics for Performance Optimization of BPMN2.0 Business Processes Robert M. Shapiro, Global 360, USA Hartmann Genrich, GMD (retired), Germany INTRODUCTION We describe a new approach to process improvement
More informationActivity Mining for Discovering Software Process Models
Activity Mining for Discovering Software Process Models Ekkart Kindler, Vladimir Rubin, Wilhelm Schäfer Software Engineering Group, University of Paderborn, Germany [kindler, vroubine, wilhelm]@uni-paderborn.de
More informationBusiness-Driven Software Engineering Lecture 3 Foundations of Processes
Business-Driven Software Engineering Lecture 3 Foundations of Processes Jochen Küster jku@zurich.ibm.com Agenda Introduction and Background Process Modeling Foundations Activities and Process Models Summary
More informationModeling BPMN Diagrams within XTT2 Framework. A Critical Analysis**
AUTOMATYKA 2011 Tom 15 Zeszyt 2 Antoni Ligêza*, Tomasz Maœlanka*, Krzysztof Kluza*, Grzegorz Jacek Nalepa* Modeling BPMN Diagrams within XTT2 Framework. A Critical Analysis** 1. Introduction Design, analysis
More informationModeling Workflow Patterns
Modeling Workflow Patterns Bizagi Suite Workflow Patterns 1 Table of Contents Modeling workflow patterns... 4 Implementing the patterns... 4 Basic control flow patterns... 4 WCP 1- Sequence... 4 WCP 2-
More informationMODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS PROCESS MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS Tao Yu Department of Computer Science, University of California at Irvine, USA Email: tyu1@uci.edu Jun-Jang Jeng IBM T.J. Watson
More informationState Propagation of Process in Microsoft PowerPoint 2
Universität Stuttgart Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik Propagation of States from BPEL Process Instances to Chevron Models David Schumm, Dimka Karastoyanova, Frank Leymann, and
More informationUsing Process Mining to Bridge the Gap between BI and BPM
Using Process Mining to Bridge the Gap between BI and BPM Wil van der alst Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands Process mining techniques enable process-centric analytics through automated
More informationSemantic Analysis of Business Process Executions
Semantic Analysis of Business Process Executions Fabio Casati, Ming-Chien Shan Software Technology Laboratory HP Laboratories Palo Alto HPL-2001-328 December 17 th, 2001* E-mail: [casati, shan] @hpl.hp.com
More informationestatistik.core: COLLECTING RAW DATA FROM ERP SYSTEMS
WP. 2 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS STATISTICAL COMMISSION and ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE CONFERENCE OF EUROPEAN STATISTICIANS Work Session on Statistical Data Editing (Bonn, Germany, 25-27 September
More informationBPMN by example. Bizagi Suite. Copyright 2014 Bizagi
BPMN by example Bizagi Suite Recruitment and Selection 1 Table of Contents Scope... 2 BPMN 2.0 Business Process Modeling Notation... 2 Why Is It Important To Model With Bpmn?... 2 Introduction to BPMN...
More informationBPM and Simulation. A White Paper. Signavio, Inc. Nov 2013. Katharina Clauberg, William Thomas
BPM and Simulation A White Paper Signavio, Inc. Nov 2013 Katharina Clauberg, William Thomas Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 3 2. Setting the Scene for Process Change... 4 3. Identifying the Goals
More informationOnline Compliance Monitoring of Service Landscapes
Online Compliance Monitoring of Service Landscapes J.M.E.M. van der Werf 1 and H.M.W. Verbeek 2 1 Department of Information and Computing Science, Utrecht University, The Netherlands J.M.E.M.vanderWerf@UU.nl
More informationOMG releases BPMN 1.1 - What's changed?
OMG releases BPMN 1.1 - What's changed? (revised version as of April 2008) Gero Decker 1 and Torben Schreiter 2 1 Hasso Plattner Institute, Potsdam, Germany 2 inubit AG, Berlin, Germany Abstract The Business
More informationLightweight Data Integration using the WebComposition Data Grid Service
Lightweight Data Integration using the WebComposition Data Grid Service Ralph Sommermeier 1, Andreas Heil 2, Martin Gaedke 1 1 Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Distributed
More information4.7 Business Process Model and Notation
206 4 Process Orchestrations 4.7 Business Process Model and Notation This section introduces the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), developed under the coordination of the Object Management Group.
More informationBusiness Process Improvement Framework and Representational Support
Business Process Improvement Framework and Representational Support Azeem Lodhi, Veit Köppen, and Gunter Saake Department of Technical and Business Information Systems, Faculty of Computer Science, University
More informationDecomposed processes in Cloud BPM: techniques for monitoring and the use of OLC
Decomposed processes in Cloud BPM: techniques for monitoring and the use of OLC José Martinez Garro 1, Patricia Bazán 2, and Javier Díaz 2 1 Facultad de Informática, UNLP (Universidad Nacional de La Plata),
More informationA METHOD FOR REWRITING LEGACY SYSTEMS USING BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
A METHOD FOR REWRITING LEGACY SYSTEMS USING BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY Gleison Samuel do Nascimento, Cirano Iochpe Institute of Informatics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre,
More informationsecure intelligence collection and assessment system Your business technologists. Powering progress
secure intelligence collection and assessment system Your business technologists. Powering progress The decisive advantage for intelligence services The rising mass of data items from multiple sources
More informationWorkflow Object Driven Model
Workflow Object Driven Model Włodzimierz Dąbrowski 1,2, Rafał Hryniów 2 Abstract: Within the last decade the workflow management makes an incredible career. Technology connected with the workflow management
More informationRotorcraft Health Management System (RHMS)
AIAC-11 Eleventh Australian International Aerospace Congress Rotorcraft Health Management System (RHMS) Robab Safa-Bakhsh 1, Dmitry Cherkassky 2 1 The Boeing Company, Phantom Works Philadelphia Center
More informationWebSphere Business Monitor
WebSphere Business Monitor Monitor models 2010 IBM Corporation This presentation should provide an overview of monitor models in WebSphere Business Monitor. WBPM_Monitor_MonitorModels.ppt Page 1 of 25
More informationFrom Business Process Models to Use Case Models
: A systematic approach Estrela Ferreira da Cruz, Ricardo Machado, Maribel Santos Universidade do Minho, Portugal EEWC, 7 May 2014 Agenda: Contextualization Motivation Approach From BPMN model to use case
More informationA Guide Through the BPM Maze
A Guide Through the BPM Maze WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A COMPLETE BPM SOLUTION With multiple vendors, evolving standards, and ever-changing requirements, it becomes difficult to recognize what meets your BPM
More informationINTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING NOTATION BPMN 1.2 AND BPMN 2.0
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING NOTATION BPMN 1.2 AND BPMN 2.0 Email: {goliva,gerosa}@ime.usp.br / Twitter: @golivax Agenda 2 Introduction to Business Processes BPMN 1.2 Introduction Elements
More informationVerifying Business Processes Extracted from E-Commerce Systems Using Dynamic Analysis
Verifying Business Processes Extracted from E-Commerce Systems Using Dynamic Analysis Derek Foo 1, Jin Guo 2 and Ying Zou 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 1 School of Computing 2 Queen
More informationModel Driven and Service Oriented Enterprise Integration---The Method, Framework and Platform
Driven and Oriented Integration---The Method, Framework and Platform Shuangxi Huang, Yushun Fan Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, 100084 Beijing, P.R. China {huangsx, fanyus}@tsinghua.edu.cn
More informationPIE. Internal Structure
PIE Internal Structure PIE Composition PIE (Processware Integration Environment) is a set of programs for integration of heterogeneous applications. The final set depends on the purposes of a solution
More informationSupporting the BPM lifecycle with FileNet
Supporting the BPM lifecycle with FileNet Mariska Netjes Hajo A. Reijers Wil. M.P. van der Aalst Outline Introduction Evaluation approach Evaluation of FileNet Conclusions Business Process Management Supporting
More informationFast and Easy Delivery of Data Mining Insights to Reporting Systems
Fast and Easy Delivery of Data Mining Insights to Reporting Systems Ruben Pulido, Christoph Sieb rpulido@de.ibm.com, christoph.sieb@de.ibm.com Abstract: During the last decade data mining and predictive
More informationCRISTAL: Collection of Resource-centrIc Supporting Tools And Languages
CRISTAL: Collection of Resource-centrIc Supporting Tools And Languages Cristina Cabanillas, Adela del-río-ortega, Manuel Resinas, and Antonio Ruiz-Cortés Universidad de Sevilla, Spain {cristinacabanillas,
More informationHandling Big(ger) Logs: Connecting ProM 6 to Apache Hadoop
Handling Big(ger) Logs: Connecting ProM 6 to Apache Hadoop Sergio Hernández 1, S.J. van Zelst 2, Joaquín Ezpeleta 1, and Wil M.P. van der Aalst 2 1 Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering
More informationQuality Assurance for Hydrometric Network Data as a Basis for Integrated River Basin Management
Quality Assurance for Hydrometric Network Data as a Basis for Integrated River Basin Management FRANK SCHLAEGER 1, MICHAEL NATSCHKE 1 & DANIEL WITHAM 2 1 Kisters AG, Charlottenburger Allee 5, 52068 Aachen,
More informationMonitoring BPMN-Processes with Rules in a Distributed Environment
Monitoring BPMN-Processes with Rules in a Distributed Environment Lothar Hotz 1, Stephanie von Riegen 1, Lars Braubach 2, Alexander Pokahr 2, and Torsten Schwinghammer 3 1 HITeC e.v. c/o Fachbereich Informatik,
More informationLEADing Practice: Artifact Description: Business, Information & Data Object Modelling. Relating Objects
LEADing Practice: Artifact Description: Business, Information & Data Object Modelling Relating Objects 1 Table of Contents 1.1 The Way of Thinking with Objects... 3 1.2 The Way of Working with Objects...
More informationEnterprise Information Integration (EII) A Technical Ally of EAI and ETL Author Bipin Chandra Joshi Integration Architect Infosys Technologies Ltd
Enterprise Information Integration (EII) A Technical Ally of EAI and ETL Author Bipin Chandra Joshi Integration Architect Infosys Technologies Ltd Page 1 of 8 TU1UT TUENTERPRISE TU2UT TUREFERENCESUT TABLE
More informationMethods and Technologies for Business Process Monitoring
Methods and Technologies for Business Monitoring Josef Schiefer Vienna, June 2005 Agenda» Motivation/Introduction» Real-World Examples» Technology Perspective» Web-Service Based Business Monitoring» Adaptive
More informationAchieving Semantic Interoperability By UsingComplex Event Processing Technology
Achieving Semantic Interoperability By UsingComplex Event Processing Technology Margarete Donovang-Kuhlisch Geschäftsbereich Verteidigung IBMDeutschlandGmbH Gorch-Fock-Str. 4 D-53229Bonn mdk@de.ibm.com
More informationDeveloping a Service Oriented Process Management System for University Quality Assurance
Developing a Service Oriented Process Management System for University Quality Assurance PROF. DR. TAHER TAWFEK HAMZA Dept. of computer science, faculty of computer science and informatics, mansoura university,
More informationUSAGE OF BUSINESS RULES IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
TOTAL LOGISTIC MANAGEMENT No. 2 2009 PP. 5 13 Bartłomiej GAWEŁ, Anna PILCH USAGE OF BUSINESS RULES IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT Abstract: The growth of efficiency in supply chain management depends on the
More information1.. This UI allows the performance of the business process, for instance, on an ecommerce system buy a book.
* ** Today s organization increasingly prompted to integrate their business processes and to automate the largest portion possible of them. A common term used to reflect the automation of these processes
More informationDemonstrating WSMX: Least Cost Supply Management
Demonstrating WSMX: Least Cost Supply Management Eyal Oren 2, Alexander Wahler 1, Bernhard Schreder 1, Aleksandar Balaban 1, Michal Zaremba 2, and Maciej Zaremba 2 1 NIWA Web Solutions, Vienna, Austria
More informationProcess Modeling using BPMN 2.0
Process Modeling using BPMN 2.0 This chapter provides a brief overview of Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) concepts with particular emphasis on the BPMN 2.0 additions. In addition, it describes
More informationComplex Event Processing (CEP) Why and How. Richard Hallgren BUGS 2013-05-30
Complex Event Processing (CEP) Why and How Richard Hallgren BUGS 2013-05-30 Objectives Understand why and how CEP is important for modern business processes Concepts within a CEP solution Overview of StreamInsight
More informationD5.2.1 Process Forecasting and Simulation (Prototype I)
n ADVENTURE WP 5 D5.2.1 Forecasting and Simulation D5.2.1 Process Forecasting and Simulation Authors: UVI Delivery Date: 2013-03-15 Due Date: 2013-02-28 Dissemination Level: PP This deliverable provides
More informationSelection Requirements for Business Activity Monitoring Tools
Research Publication Date: 13 May 2005 ID Number: G00126563 Selection Requirements for Business Activity Monitoring Tools Bill Gassman When evaluating business activity monitoring product alternatives,
More informationUsing UML Part Two Behavioral Modeling Diagrams
UML Tutorials Using UML Part Two Behavioral Modeling Diagrams by Sparx Systems All material Sparx Systems 2007 Sparx Systems 2007 Page 1 Trademarks Object Management Group, OMG, Unified Modeling Language,
More informationOracle Data Integrator: Administration and Development
Oracle Data Integrator: Administration and Development What you will learn: In this course you will get an overview of the Active Integration Platform Architecture, and a complete-walk through of the steps
More informationTHE EVOLVING ROLE OF DATABASE IN OBJECT SYSTEMS
THE EVOLVING ROLE OF DATABASE IN OBJECT SYSTEMS William Kent Database Technology Department Hewlett-Packard Laboratories Palo Alto, California kent@hpl.hp.com 1990 CONTENTS: ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationOntology-Based Discovery of Workflow Activity Patterns
Ontology-Based Discovery of Workflow Activity Patterns Diogo R. Ferreira 1, Susana Alves 1, Lucinéia H. Thom 2 1 IST Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal {diogo.ferreira,susana.alves}@ist.utl.pt 2
More informationDatabase Application Developer Tools Using Static Analysis and Dynamic Profiling
Database Application Developer Tools Using Static Analysis and Dynamic Profiling Surajit Chaudhuri, Vivek Narasayya, Manoj Syamala Microsoft Research {surajitc,viveknar,manojsy}@microsoft.com Abstract
More informationProcess Mining and Monitoring Processes and Services: Workshop Report
Process Mining and Monitoring Processes and Services: Workshop Report Wil van der Aalst (editor) Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.Box 513, NL-5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. w.m.p.v.d.aalst@tm.tue.nl
More information1 Energy Data Problem Domain. 2 Getting Started with ESPER. 2.1 Experimental Setup. Diogo Anjos José Cavalheiro Paulo Carreira
1 Energy Data Problem Domain Energy Management Systems (EMSs) are energy monitoring tools that collect data streams from energy meters and other related sensors. In real-world, buildings are equipped with
More informationWeb Traffic Capture. 5401 Butler Street, Suite 200 Pittsburgh, PA 15201 +1 (412) 408 3167 www.metronomelabs.com
Web Traffic Capture Capture your web traffic, filtered and transformed, ready for your applications without web logs or page tags and keep all your data inside your firewall. 5401 Butler Street, Suite
More informationFive Steps to Integrate SalesForce.com with 3 rd -Party Systems and Avoid Most Common Mistakes
Five Steps to Integrate SalesForce.com with 3 rd -Party Systems and Avoid Most Common Mistakes This white paper will help you learn how to integrate your SalesForce.com data with 3 rd -party on-demand,
More informationHuman-Readable BPMN Diagrams
Human-Readable BPMN Diagrams Refactoring OMG s E-Mail Voting Example Thomas Allweyer V 1.1 1 The E-Mail Voting Process Model The Object Management Group (OMG) has published a useful non-normative document
More informationAn Interface from YAWL to OpenERP
An Interface from YAWL to OpenERP Joerg Evermann Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada jevermann@mun.ca Abstract. The paper describes an interface from the YAWL
More informationSolution Overview. Optimizing Customer Care Processes Using Operational Intelligence
Solution Overview > Optimizing Customer Care Processes Using Operational Intelligence 1 Table of Contents 1 Executive Overview 2 Establishing Visibility Into Customer Care Processes 3 Insightful Analysis
More informationA Prototype for View-based Monitoring of BPEL Processes
Universität Stuttgart Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik A Prototype for View-based Monitoring of BPEL Processes David Schumm, Gregor Latuske, and Frank Leymann Technical Report
More informationLinking BPMN, ArchiMate, and BWW: Perfect Match for Complete and Lawful Business Process Models?
Linking BPMN, ArchiMate, and BWW: Perfect Match for Complete and Lawful Business Process Models? Ludmila Penicina Institute of Applied Computer Systems, Riga Technical University, 1 Kalku, Riga, LV-1658,
More informationMonitoring Infrastructure (MIS) Software Architecture Document. Version 1.1
Monitoring Infrastructure (MIS) Software Architecture Document Version 1.1 Revision History Date Version Description Author 28-9-2004 1.0 Created Peter Fennema 8-10-2004 1.1 Processed review comments Peter
More informationifinder ENTERPRISE SEARCH
DATA SHEET ifinder ENTERPRISE SEARCH ifinder - the Enterprise Search solution for company-wide information search, information logistics and text mining. CUSTOMER QUOTE IntraFind stands for high quality
More informationOpenText Cordys Business Process Management Suite
OpenText Cordys Business Process Management Suite Realizing ROI for enterprise BPM initiatives T oday s economic reality is one of extreme competition, very demanding customers, commoditization of products
More information