1 MODEL DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (2012) - before Master Roberts and Master Cook Introductory note. These are the Model Directions for use in the first Case Management Conference in clinical negligence cases before the Masters. A draft order in Word format, adopting the Model Directions as necessary, is to be provided by to the Master at least 2 days before the hearing. Parties are required to use the form of order at the end of this document adapted as necessary. From April 2013 CPR Rule changes will require parties to take as their starting point any relevant Model or Standard Directions The addresses of the clinical negligence Masters are: The Model Directions allow the court and the parties to be flexible. For example, sequential exchange of quantum statements (say, with schedule and counter-schedule of loss) may be appropriate. The sequential exchange of expert evidence on breach of duty and causation may sometimes be appropriate. It would be helpful if dates appeared in bold type.
2 Please note: Solicitors must ensure that the claimant is accurately described in the title to the order: e.g., JOHN SMITH (a child and protected party by his mother and Litigation Friend, JOAN SMITH). It is never permissible to refer to such a claimant as JOHN SMITH. The order should make it clear that it is made pursuant to a Case Management Conference or an application or both. Please note the role of experts in the preparation of Agendas.
3 Warning: you must comply with the terms imposed upon you by this order otherwise your case is liable to be struck out or some other sanction imposed. If you cannot comply you are expected to make formal application to the court before any deadline imposed upon you expires.
4 on xxxx before Master Xxxx sitting in Room E118 E112 at The Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London the Master heard the solicitor for the Claimant and the solicitor for the Defendant and made the following Order Delete room number as appropriate.
5 1) The Claim is allocated to the Multi-Track and is assigned to Master Xxxx for case management. All claims issued in the High Court must be allocated to the Multitrack and may well have been allocated earlier. This merely confirms allocation for the avoidance of doubt and confirms the docketing of the claim to the assigned Master. 2) At all stages the parties must consider settling this litigation by any means of Alternative Dispute Resolution (including round table conferences, early neutral evaluation, mediation and arbitration); any party not engaging in any such means proposed by another is to serve a witness statement giving reasons within 21 days of receipt of that proposal. That witness statement must not be shown to the trial judge until questions of costs arise. The object is to reduce door of the court settlements which are wasteful of costs, resources and judicial time. 21 days can be altered. The words and not less than 28 days before trial can always be added after the word proposal by the managing judge if appropriate. Not necessary for every Order. There can be added: Such means of Alternative Dispute Resolution adopted shall be concluded not less than 35 days before trial. 3) Documents are to be retained as follows: a) the parties must retain all electronically stored documents relating to the issues in this Claim. b) the Defendant must retain the original clinical notes relating
6 to the issues in this Claim. The Defendant must give facilities for inspection by the Claimant, the Claimant s legal advisers and experts of these original notes on 7 days written notice. c) legible copies of the medical and educational records of the Claimant / Deceased / Claimant s Mother are to be placed in a separate paginated bundle by the Claimant s Solicitors and kept up to date. All references to medical notes are to be made by reference to the pages in that bundle. 4) This and any additional paragraphs to be inserted here may cover various case management directions: Amendments The following is suggested: Permission to Claimant / Defendant to amend the Particulars of Claim / Defence in terms of the draft initialled by the Master [or the draft served on xxxx]; the Defendant to serve an amended Defence by xxxx. Costs of and occasioned by the amendments to be borne by (usually, the party seeking permission to amend). [Where no draft is available, but the form of the amendments is not contentious] (Party wishing to amend) to serve draft amended [Statement of Case] by xxxx. If no objection to the draft amendments, response to be served by xxxx, if objection is taken to the draft, permission to restore. Judgment (The following is suggested: Judgment for an amount to be decided by the court being xx% of the damages due on a full liability basis.
7 Split Trial [An order That there be a split trial is inappropriate. The following is suggested.] A preliminary issue shall be tried between the Claimant and the Defendant as to whether or not the Defendant is liable to the Claimant by reason of the matters alleged in the Particulars of Claim and, if so, whether or not any of the injuries described were so caused; and, if any such injuries were so caused, the extent of the same. 5) Disclosure of documents relevant to the issues of breach of duty and causation and quantification of damages will be dealt with as follows: a) By 4pm on xxxx both parties must give to each other standard disclosure of documents by list and category. b) By 4pm on xxxx any request must be made to inspect the original of, or to provide a copy of, a disclosable document. c) Any such request unless objected to must be complied with within 14 days of the request. d) By 4pm on xxxx each party must serve and file with the court a list of issues relevant to the search for and disclosure of electronically stored documents, or must confirm there are no such issues, following Practice Direction 31B. The words and category are optional. Where there is a large number of documents all falling into a particular category, the disclosing party may list those documents as a category rather than individually. See: para 3.2 to Practice Direction 31A.
8 6) Evidence of fact will be dealt with as follows: a) By 4pm on xxxx both parties must serve on each other copies of the signed statements of themselves and of all witnesses on whom they intend to rely in respect of breach of duty and causation and all notices relating to evidence, including Civil Evidence Act notices. b) For the avoidance of doubt statements of all concerned with the relevant treatment and care of the Claimant must be included. c) By 4pm on xxxx both parties must serve on each other copies of the signed statements of themselves and of all witnesses on whom they intend to rely in respect of condition, prognosis and loss and all notices relating to evidence, including Civil Evidence Act notices. d) Oral evidence will not be permitted at trial from a witness whose statement has not been served in accordance with this order or has been served late, except with permission from the Court. e) Evidence of fact is limited to xx witnesses on behalf of each party. f) Witness statements must not exceed xx pages of A4 in length. 7) Expert evidence is directed as follows. The following text is not designed to be prescriptive, but will cover the essential directions for expert evidence. The directions will identify the disciplines of expertise on which it proposed to rely and, preferably, the names of each expert (or a direction requiring the
9 expert to be named by a date). Where necessary the specific issues which the expert is to address can be identified. 8) The parties have permission in respect of breach of duty and causation and quantification of damages to rely on the following jointly instructed written evidence of an expert xxxx a) By xxxx the expert should be agreed and instructed, and if no expert has been instructed by that date the Claimant must apply to court by 4pm the following day for further directions. b) By xxxx the expert will report to the instructing parties. c) By xxxx the parties may put written questions to the expert. Delete as necessary OR experts in the following fields: Where it is necessary to confine an expert to specific issues the following subparagraph is appropriate: a) The expert s report will be confined to the following issues i) xxxxx d) By xxxx the expert will reply to the questions. ii) xxxxx e) A copy of this order must be served on the expert by the Claimant with the expert's instructions. f) A party seeking to call the expert to give oral evidence at trial must apply for permission to do so before pre-trial check lists are filed. g) Unless the parties agree in writing or the Court orders otherwise, the fees and expenses of the expert shall be paid by the parties giving instructions for the report equally. Whether questions are to be put to the single joint expert is a matter for case management. If they are not required the subparagraphs can be deleted. The following optional subparagraph can be used: The expert may apply direct to the court for directions where necessary under Rule Civil Procedure Rules.
10 9) In respect of breach of duty and causation the parties each have permission to rely on the following written expert evidence: a) The Claimant: i) an expert in xxxx, namely Mr A, whose report must be ii) an expert in xxxx, namely Dr B, whose report must be The following can be added for each expert: confined to the following issues: iii) an expert in xxxx, namely Ms C, whose report must be served by xxxx b) The Defendant: i) an expert xxxx, namely Mr AA, whose report must be ii) iii) an expert xxxx, namely Mr BB, whose report must be an expert xxxx, namely Ms CC, whose report must be 10) In respect of condition, prognosis and quantification of damages the parties (the Defendants acting jointly) each have permission to rely on the following written expert evidence:
11 a) The Claimant: i) an expert in xxxx, namely Mr A, whose report must be ii) iii) an expert in xxxx, namely Dr B, whose report must be an expert in xxxx, namely Ms C, whose report must be b) The Defendant: i) an expert in xxxx, namely Mr AA, whose report must be ii) iii) an expert in xxxx, namely Mr BB, whose report must be an expert in xxxx, namely Ms CC, whose report must be 11) Unless the reports are agreed, there must be a without prejudice discussion between the experts of like discipline by 4pm on xxxx in which the experts will identify the issues between them and reach agreement if possible. The experts will prepare for the court and sign a statement of the issues on which they agree and on which they disagree with a summary of their reasons in accordance with Rule Civil Procedure Rules, and each A guide is 8 weeks after the exchange of reports for the discussion and 7 days to produce their statement. The following direction may be used as appropriate: Discussions between experts are not mandatory. The parties should
12 statement must be sent to the parties to be received by 4pm on xxxx and in any event no later than 7 days after the discussion. consider, with their expert, whether there is likely to be any useful purpose in holding a discussion and should be prepared to agree that no discussion is in fact needed. Where it is necessary to identify more specifically the areas of discussion, the following may be used (numbering not formatted): The purpose of the discussions is to identify: The extent of the agreement between the experts; The points of disagreement and short reasons for disagreement; Action, if any, which may be taken to resolve the outstanding points of disagreement; Any further material points not raised in the Agenda and the extent to which these issues are agreed 12) xxxx Agendas The use of an agenda is not necessary in every case. Claimants solicitors and counsel should note the obligation to prepare the draft Agenda jointly with the relevant expert. Experts should note that it is part of their overriding duty to the court to ensure that the Agenda complies with the following direction which may be used (numbering not formatted): The use of agendas is not mandatory. Solicitors should consult with the experts to ensure that agendas are necessary and, if used, are reasonable in scope. The agenda should assist the experts and should not be in the form of leading questions or hostile in tone. An agenda must include a list of the outstanding issues in the preamble.
13 The preamble should state: the standard of proof : the Bolam test : remind the experts not to attempt to determine factual issues : remind them not to stray outside their field of expertise and indicate the form of the joint statement. It will also be helpful to provide a comprehensive list of the materials which each expert has seen, perhaps in the form of an agreed supplementary bundle (it is assumed that experts will have been provided with the medical notes bundle). Otherwise the following direction may be used (numbering not formatted): Unless otherwise agreed by all parties solicitors, after consulting with the experts, a draft Agenda which directs the experts to the remaining issues relevant to the experts discipline, as identified in the statements of case shall be prepared jointly by the Claimant s solicitors and experts and sent to the Defendant s solicitors for comment at least 35 days before the agreed date for the experts discussions. The Defendants shall within 21 days of receipt agree the Agenda, or propose amendments. 7 days thereafter all solicitors shall use their best endeavours to agree the Agenda. Points of disagreement should be on matters of real substance and not semantics or on matters the experts could resolve of their own accord at the discussion. In default of agreement, both versions shall be considered at the discussions. Agendas, when used, shall be provided to the experts not less than 7 days before the date fixed for discussions.
14 Where it has been impossible to agree a single agenda, it is of assistance to the experts if the second agenda is consecutively numbered to the first, i.e. if the first agenda has 16 questions in it, the second agenda is numbered from 17 onwards. 13) A copy of this order must be served on each expert by the Claimant with the expert's instructions. 14) The parties have permission to call oral evidence of the experts in xxxx. OR A party seeking to call oral expert evidence at trial must apply for permission to do so before pre-trial check lists are filed. 15) Any unpublished literature upon which any expert witness proposes to rely must be served at the same time as service of his report together with a list of published literature. Any supplementary literature upon which any expert witness relies must be notified to all parties at least one month before trial. No expert witness may rely upon any publications that have not been disclosed in accordance with this order without the permission of the trial judge subject to costs as appropriate. 16) Experts will, at the time of producing their reports, incorporate details of any employment or activity which raises a possible conflict of interest.
15 17) For the avoidance of doubt, experts do not require the authorisation of solicitor or counsel before signing a joint statement. 18) If an expert radically alters an opinion previously recorded, the joint statement should include a note or addendum by that expert explaining the change of opinion. 19) Schedules of Loss must be updated as follows: a) By 4pm on xxxx the Claimant must send an up to date schedule of loss to the Defendant. b) By 4pm on xxxx the Defendant, in the event of challenge, must send an up to date counter-schedule of loss to the Claimant. c) The schedule and counter-schedule must contain a statement setting out that party s case on the issue of periodical payments pursuant to Rule 41.5 Civil Procedure Rules. 20) The trial will be listed as follows. a) By 4pm on xxxx Claimant s Solicitors must apply to Queen s Bench Judges Listing for a listing appointment for a trial within the trial window and give notice of the appointment to the Defendant. b) Trial: Judge alone; London c) Category: B Note: This does not affect Rule which provides that where experts reach agreement on an issue during their discussions, the agreement shall not bind the parties unless the parties expressly agree to be bound by the agreement. Periodical Payments. Parties should, at the first case management conference, be prepared to give their provisional view as to whether the case is one in which the periodical payment of damages might be appropriate. Schedules. Parties are encouraged to exchange Schedules in a form which enables the Counter schedule to be based on the Claimant s Schedule i.e. by delivering a disk with the hard copy, or by sending it as an attachment. Usually 6 weeks after the case management conference The Queen s Bench Judges Listing, in order to maintain the necessary degree of flexibility for listing, will give a trial period rather than a fixed date, but, in order to accommodate the parties need for certainty as to dates for experts to attend, will, if an approach is made closer to the beginning of the trial period, confirm
16 d) Trial window: from xxxx to xxxx inclusive. e) Time estimate: x days f) The parties shall file Pre-Trial Check Lists as directed by the Queen s Bench Judges Listing. the date for the trial to begin as the first day of the trial period. The trial period will usually be directed to begin at least 2 clear months after the last event besides Alternative Dispute Resolution (this is to allow for Alternative Dispute Resolution). In relatively modest claims ( in term of damages only), the Master may direct: If the parties reach agreement upon breach of duty and causation, the parties are to immediately restore the case before the Master so that alternative directions on the assessment of damages may be considered. The following subparagraph may be added: Certified fit for High Court Judge if available 21) Pre-trial directions are as follows: a) There will be a review case management conference in Room E118 E112 4 weeks before the trial window starts with a time estimate of half an hour. b) The case management conference will be conducted by telephone, unless the court orders otherwise. The Claimant must make the relevant arrangements in accordance with Practice Direction 23A Civil Procedure Rules. c) At least 3 clear days before the case management conference Delete Room number as appropriate This hearing may be vacated by consent provided that all directions have been complied with; no further directions are required; and the Master is given reasonable notice. NB the default for a case management conference with a time estimate of no more than one hour is by telephone. See Practice Direction 23A paragraph 6.
17 the Claimant must file and send to the Defendant preferably agreed and by i) any draft directions; ii) a case summary. 22) Not more than 7 nor less than 3 clear days before the trial, the Claimant must file at court and serve an indexed and paginated bundle of documents which complies with the requirements of Rule 39.5 Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Direction 39A. The parties must endeavour to agree the contents of the bundle before it is filed. The bundle will include a case summary and a chronology. 23) The parties must file with the court and exchange skeleton arguments at least three days before the trial, by . 24) Costs in the case. Or other costs order sought Note: A party may request the restoration of a CMC or application by letter or to the assigned Master. If possible the Master should be provided with an agreed list of dates to avoid. Where the application is urgent and the time estimate is no more than 30 minutes, the Master will endeavour to list a hearing at 10.00am as soon as possible. Applications estimated to take more than 30 minutes should be applied for as private room appointments in the usual way.]
18 [Both Masters are willing, in appropriate cases, to hear applications by telephone link, provided sufficient notice is given directly to the Master concerned and the relevant papers are provided in advance. s are an acceptable means of communication, provided that they are copied to all parties.] [NOTE. : The Court File in cases proceeding before the Masters will not routinely be placed before the Master. Parties wishing for it to be produced should notify the Case Management Section FIVE CLEAR DAYS in advance of the appointment. In all other cases parties should bring with them copies of any filed documents upon which they intend to rely.
Warning: you must comply with the terms imposed upon you by this order otherwise your case is liable to be struck out or some other sanction imposed. If you cannot comply you are expected to make formal
Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Introduction 1. The purpose of this guidance is to assist litigants, those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND PROTOCOL FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE LITIGATION 1. Practitioners are reminded of the need to bear in mind the overriding objective set out at Order 1 rule 1(a)
PRACTICE DIRECTION 27A FAMILY PROCEEDINGS: COURT BUNDLES (UNIVERSAL PRACTICE TO BE APPLIED IN THE HIGH COURT AND FAMILY COURT) This Practice Direction supplements FPR Part 27 1.1 The President of the Family
PRACTICE DIRECTION NUMBER 11 OF 2012 SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPERVISED CASE LIST 1. Practice Direction No 6 of 2000 is hereby repealed. 2. This Practice Direction is intended to (a) provide some explanation
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
PRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 1 OF 2015 Introduction IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEENS BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) EXPERT EVIDENCE 1. This Practice Direction applies to all proceedings in
Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to give Evidence in Civil Claims June 2005 amended October 2009 CONTENTS Page No. 1. Introduction... 3 2. Aims of Protocol... 3 3. Application 4 Limitation. 4 4.
Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims PROTOCOLS Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notes of guidance 2A ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 3 The aims of the protocol 4 The protocol 5 Communication 6 Letter
Expert evidence A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition) Addendum, June 2009 1. Introduction 1.1 The second edition of this Guide was published in October 2003, in order to set out
VHCC - Legal Aid Agency Clinical Negligence Funding Checklist April 2013 v1 Version: Issue date: Last review date: Owned by: 1 01.04.2013 01.04.2013 Special Cases Unit Version History Version: Date Reason
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 firstname.lastname@example.org Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Lord Woolf in his final Access to Justice Report of July 1996 recommended the development of protocols: To build on and increase the
VHCC - Legal Aid Agency Clinical Negligence Funding Checklist April 2013 v2 (amended October 2015) Version: Issue date: Last review date: Owned by: 1 01.04.2013 01.04.2013 Special Cases Unit Version History
The following forms are referred to in this guide and are available from the HMCTS website: Form N461: Judicial Review claim form Form 461PC: Planning Court Judicial Review claim form Form N463: Judicial
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND [Court Division] [Title of Case] Directions given by [Name of the Master] On [Date] WHEREAS this action is listed today for review before the Master, NOW
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 3189 (TCC) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Case No: HT-10-332 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice Directions (Amendment No. 1 of 2016) Part X: Originating Processes and Documents 66A. Timelines for proceedings commenced by Writ of Summons and by Originating
Draft Pre Action Protocol for claims for damages for mesothelioma Contents Introduction...2 1. Overview of Protocol General Aim...2 2. Intimation Letter...2 3. Letter of Claim...3 4. Defendant's Response...4
RULE 63 DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW Definitions (1) In this rule, Application claim for relief includes a child support order, a spousal support order, a custody order, a property order, and corollary relief
Open, Calderbank and Part 36 offers considerations and tactics PJ Kirby QC 1. Introduction 1.1 In detailed assessment proceedings there will, as in all disputes, be advantages in settling the matter in
CHAPTER 42A Case management of certain personal injuries actions Application and interpretation of this Chapter 42A.1. (1) Subject to paragraph (3), this Chapter applies to actions proceeding as ordinary
COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR EXPERTS Justice Peter Biscoe 1. It is a pleasure to present this paper to the Environmental Institute of Australia and New Zealand s Professional Environmental Practice
- The Defendant Costs Specialists Costs Law Update Lamont v Burton The Court of Appeal s decision last week in Lamont v Burton  EWCA Civ 429 is likely to have serious costs implications for defendants
PRACTICE DIRECTION AMENDMENTS The new Practice Direction Case Management Pilot supplementing the Court of Protection Rules 2007 is made by the President of the Court of Protection under the powers delegated
October 2013 Amended December 2013: Addition of paragraphs 19.11A and 20.9A Revision to paragraph 5.23 Amended February 2014: Revision of paragraph 4.16 and Appendix 3 paragraph 23 Amended September 2014:
Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 2668 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION BEFORE: Case No: QB/2013/0325 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL 31 July 2013 HIS HONOUR
South Australia Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 SCHEDULE 3 APPROVED FORMS Schedule 3 Approved Forms relate to Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014, dated 2nd September 2014, that came
APPLICATIONS FOR A FINANCIAL REMEDY PART 9 PART 9 Contents of this Part I APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION Rule 9.1 Application Rule 9.2 Application of Magistrates Courts Rules 1981 Rule 9.3 Interpretation
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 -UNIT 9 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2010 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process
The Court of Protection Transparency Pilot Introduction 1. On January 2016 the Court of Protection will begin a pilot scheme aimed at addressing one of the most controversial of its characteristics- its
Contents of this Part PART 33 EXPERT EVIDENCE When this Part applies rule 33.1 Expert s duty to the court rule 33.2 Introduction of expert evidence rule 33.3 Content of expert s report rule 33.4 Expert
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
Queen s Bench Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3 Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form R Nil rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form R rule No. Form No. Source
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ORDER NO. 1682 Amending Civil Rules 16, 26, 33, 34, 37, and 45 concerning Discovery of Electronic Information IT IS ORDERED: 1. Civil Rule 16 is amended to read
Policy and Procedure for Claims Management RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: COMMUNICATIONS, PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND HUMAN RESOURCES EFFECTIVE FROM: 08/07/10 REVIEW DATE: 01/04/11 To be read in conjunction with: Complaints
IN THE SUBORDINATE COURTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE PRACTICE DIRECTIONS AMENDMENT NO 4 OF 2012 It is hereby notified for general information that, with effect from 22 November 2012, the existing Appendix
This leaflet is designed to provide you with a brief outline of the practice and procedure of the High Court and the District Court on taxation of costs in civil proceedings. You should read Order 62 of
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph 1.1 Preamble Paragraph 2.1 Aims Paragraph 3.1
Dispute Resolution At A Glance Guide 2 The English Civil Procedure Rules The Woolf Reforms The English Civil Procedure Rules Contents Section: Page No. 1. Introduction 2 2. Summary 3 3. Civil Procedure
Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 4256 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION Case No: 1HQ/13/0265 1HQ/13/0689 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL BEFORE: Wednesday, 2
Tribunals b Judiciary PRACTICE DIRECTIONS IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBERS OF THE FIRST- TIER TRIBUNAL AND THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Contents PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Interpretation, etc. PART 2 PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
Disclaimer In all cases solicitors must ensure that any agreement with a client is made in compliance with their professional duties, the requirements of the SRA and any statutory requirements depending
DO NOT PASS GO DO NOT COLLECT $200 PERSONAL INJURY PLEADINGS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS BY: MR NADIM BASHIR NEW PARK COURT CHAMBERS LEEDS LSI 2SJ TEL: 0113 243 3277 1 1. Introduction If there was any doubt
The Technology and Construction Court Guide Second Edition Issued 3rd October 2005, third revision with effect from 3 March 2014 Crown copyright 2015 This publication is licensed under the terms of the
THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL) (HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CARE CHAMBER) RULES 2008 S.I. 2008 No. 2699 (L. 16) as in force on 1 st September 2014 This document shows the Rules as amended
HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS OF THE EL/PL PORTAL PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS (EMPLOYERS LIABILITY AND PUBLIC LIABILITY) CLAIMS Colin Richmond 11/04/2013 www.zenithchambers.co.uk
Practice Note 8 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 8 PARENTING TIME/PARENTING RESPONSIBILITIES ASSESSMENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND APPLICATION.....................................
http://websvr/textimagecreator (Text image creator to change heading) Pre action protocol for low value personal injury claims in road traffic accidents Contents SECTION I - INTRODUCTION Definitions Paragraph
Neutral Citation Number:  EWHC 3279 (QB) Case No: HQ09X03020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 20/11/2012 Before : THE HONOURABLE
1 1. Introduction The Lifecycle of a Personal Injury Claim By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom July 2012 The aim of the presentation is to look at the basic steps from the taking instructions
SCHEDULE 13 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions In this Schedule, in addition to the definitions set out in Section 1.1 of the Agreement: "Dispute" means any disagreement, failure
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Merlo v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1136 Date: 20130625 Docket: S122255 Registry: Vancouver Between: Brought under the Class Proceedings Act,
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL WORK TREATED AS ANNEXED TO THE CONDITIONAL FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOLICITOR AND COUNSEL FOR CLAIMANT EMPLOYMENT
Contents French v Carter Lemon Camerons LLP 1 Excelerate Technology Limited v Cumberbatch and Others 3 Downing v Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 5 Yeo v Times Newspapers Limited
JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title Division Corporate Services Department/Ward Directorate of Policy & Legal Services Location Trust Headquarters, Harton Wing Main Purpose of the Job To manage, on behalf of the
Medical Litigation in 2012 Jacob Tse Partner Mayer Brown JSM 8 May 2012 Medical Litigation All kinds of litigation relating to medico-legal matters Legal action for medical negligence 23989412 2 Time limit
JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes Effective February 2015 JAMS DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES FOR SURETY BOND DISPUTES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services worldwide. We resolve
MAKING A PERSONAL INJURIES CLAIM* GETTING STARTED DO I HAVE A CASE? The first step is to contact one of our experienced personal injuries solicitors and arrange a no obligation consultation. At the initial
MOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS Introduction By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com The protocol for Low Value
JUSTICE GERALD E. LOEHR, J.S.C. Rockland County Supreme Court 1 South Main Street New City, New York 10956 Courtroom 1 Tel: (845) 483-8343 Fax: (845) 708-7236 Staff Bruce J. Pearl, Principal Law Secretary
In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS Contents I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1 Purpose of these Regulations... 4 2 Applicability to different staff
PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATING DISPUTES BETWEEN TWO STATES 39 OPTIONAL ARBITRATION RULES TWO STATES CONTENTS Introduction 43 Section I. Introductory Rules 45 Scope of Application
COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA Q.B. FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 3 FAMILY LAW CONFERENCES (For matters under Part 12 of the Alberta Rules of Court) EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2011 Pursuant to Rule 4.11, a Court-directed
The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (S.I. 2009/273 (L.1)) As in force on 1 st April 2013 This document shows the Rules as amended by S.I. 2010/43, S.I. 2010/2653, S.I.
Cafcass and Independent Reviewing Officer Protocol for Public Law Work The Protocol has been developed in response to the need to agree a clear understanding of the statutory roles and interface between
CHAPTER NINE DISPUTES SETTLEMENT ARTICLE 187 Scope of the Chapter The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Treaty, including:
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES THE HIGH COURT GUIDELINES (A document to assist those participating in a judicial settlement conference) Issued April 2012 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The High Court s jurisdiction
Page 1 of 9 LABOUR COURTS AND CCMA RULES LABOUR APPEAL COURT RULES RULES REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT Act Published under GN 1666 of 14 October 1996 [with effect
The Incorporated Law Society of Cardiff and District Members Forum 30 January 2013 JACKSON REFORMS WHERE ARE WE NOW? Michael Imperato Simon Cradick Agenda Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Webber v. Boutilier, 2016 NSSC 5 Date: 20160105 Docket: Hfx No. 241129 Registry: Halifax Between: Cindy June Webber v. Plaintiff Arthur Boutilier and Dartmouth Central
PROTOCOLS Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims Contents 1 Introduction 2 Notes of guidance 3 The protocol 4 Rehabilitation 5 Resolution of issues A Letter of claim B Pre-action personal injury